1 of 5
International Coordination Action
Progress Report

PERSONAL DETAILS
Full name
of the
coordinated international
research network (no
abbreviations)
Application number
Coordinator of the
network
Duration of the
International
Coordination Action
(from DD/MM/YY till
DD/MM/YY)
Period on which is being
reported (from
DD/MM/YY till
DD/MM/YY)
 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS AND OUTCOME FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION ACTION



Describe the network activities that you have conducted in the framework of this International
Coordination Action, and the results obtained until now.
Describe how these activities contributed to the scientific goals of the network as described in
the original application.
Describe the impact and added value for the Flemish research community
(ca. 2500 words)
2 of 5
International Coordination Action
Progress Report
 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
Describe for which network activities the budget has been used until now. List all staff members
paid by the budget from this International Coordination Action, and mention for each of them their
contribution to specific tasks and activities of the network as described in the original application.
3 of 5
International Coordination Action
Progress Report
 WORK PLAN
Describe in detail the coordination tasks that remain to be done and the planning of these actions.
4 of 5
International Coordination Action
Progress Report
 LIST OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS RESULTING FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION
ACTION
GUIDELINES*:





Only mention publications resulting from this specific International Coordination Action,
published during the period on which is being reported, and authored by people directly linked
to the International Coordination Action. Papers by other authors should not be listed and will
not be considered by the panel.
In chronological order, starting with the most recent item, with full bibliographic description
and with the JCR two-year Impact Factor in the year of publication (or the most recent one).
In case of multiple authors, please indicate your own contribution (in percentage).
Clearly indicate whether the publication is published or accepted for publication (indicate in or by
which journal). Papers that are merely ‘in preparation’ should not be listed and will not be
considered by the panel.
Use the following classification:
Papers
a1.1. Articles (a) included in Web of Science’s (WoS) Science Citation Index Expanded, Social
Science Citation Index and/or Arts and Humanities Citation Index, whose document
type is labelled as “Article”, “Review”, “Letter”, “Note” and/or “Proceedings Paper” or
(b) in journals included in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) of Web of Science.
a1.2. Articles included in the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social
Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW).
a2.
Articles in scientific journals not included in A1.1. or A1.2.
Books
b1.
Author or co-author of published books (limited to books published by a scientific
publishing company; no syllabuses, no theses).
b2.
Chapters in books (no conference proceedings).
b3.
Books as editor (including editor of conference proceedings).
Other publications
c1.
Papers in proceedings of scientific conferences, that do not belong to any of the
previous categories (full articles, no abstracts).
c2.
Doctoral dissertations
c3.
Patents
c4.
All other publications or items of scientific output which are relevant to the application
and cannot be included in any of the previous categories.
*Failure to respect these guidelines may lead the panel to downgrade the mark for this report.
5 of 5
International Coordination Action
Progress Report