PowerPoint - Pickaway-Ross CTC - High Schools that Work, HSTW

advertisement

Making Time for

Student Success

Objective: High-performing schools modify school schedules to provide time for instructional planning by designing professional learning communities that facilitate collaboration aimed at improving student learning and success.

Strategy: Discover flexible, non-traditional scheduling alternatives that provide time for teachers to meet and plan assignments within and across disciplines that are intellectually demanding and align to college- and careerreadiness standards at the elementary, middle grades, and high school levels.

Presenters

• Verdie Williams- HSTW Co-coordinator/Math

Instructor

• Kevin Krebs- HSTW Co-coordinator/ Food service

Instructor

• Scott Snyder- Vocational Special Education Coordinator

• Dana Anderson- Supervisor Special Services

Pickaway-Ross

CTC

• Serves 10 Comprehensive schools

• 2 City school districts

• 8 Rural districts

County Profiles

Ross County Pickaway County

• 688 square miles

• Pop: 77,910

• Crop, Pasture, Forest :

96%

• Low Income 13.8%

• 502 square miles

• Pop: 56,304

• Crop, Pasture, Forest:

96%

• Low Income 9.7%

Academic Offerings

• Advanced Earth/Space Science

• Anatomy and Physiology

• Biology

• Chemistry

• Forensic Biology

• Earth/Space Science

• Physics

• Remedial Science

• OGT Science

• College Prep English

• English 11

• English 12

• Integrated English 11

• Integrated English 12

• Remedial English

• OGT English

OGT Social Studies

American Government/Economics

American History

Economics and Personal Finance

Sociology

Pre-Calculus/Trigonometry

Statistics

Technical Algebra

Geometry

Algebra 1

Algebra 2

Consumer Math

Workforce development

Construction & Manufacturing

Academy

Carpentry

• Electrical Technologies

• Engineering Technologies

• Machining & Manufacturing

Technologies

• Precision Welding Technologies

Business Academy

• General Merchandising

& Warehousing

Media Design Technologies

• Network Support Technologies

Transportation Academy

• Automotive Technologies

• Collision Repair Technologies

• Medium & Heavy Equipment

Transportation

•Equipment Technologies

• High‐Performance Automotive

Technologies

• Power Equipment Technologies

Human Services Academy

• Commercial Food Careers

• Cosmetology

• Criminal Investigation

& Police Science

Early Childhood Education

• Medical Careers

•Health Care Foundations

High School Demographics

• ADM (average daily membership): 982

• PRCTC Campus: 588

• Satellite: 433

• Ethnic composition

• Asian or Pacific Islander .………….…… 0.2%

• Black, non-Hispanic ….………….……….. 2.2%

• Hispanic ........………………………..….…… 0.5%

• American Indian/Alaskan .……………... 0.2%

• White/non-Hispanic …………………….. 91.2%

• Multicultural .…………………………..……. 5.3%

• Students with disability………............... 35.7%

• Students on free/reduced lunch……… 62%

High School Staff

• Background

• Work experience ..………………………………… 34%

• Master’s degree …………………………………… 46%

• Bachelor’s degree ..………………………………. 20%

• Staff assignment

• Intervention Specialist ………………………………. 5

• Para professionals ……………………………..……… 4

• Special Services/guidance ...……………...……… 3

• Career & technical education ..…………………. 95

• Academic ..……………………………….……….…..…. 17

• Administrative ..………………………..….…….……... 8

• Other ..…………………………………………………….…. 6

Why did we need intervention?

• Perkins Performance Measures

Academic Attainment-Reading/Language Arts

95

94

93

92

91

90

89

88

87

86

85

PRJVSD

STATE

93,89

88,25

2007-08

88,25

93,89

93,31

89,25

2008-09

89,25

93,31

93,47

91,62

2009-10

91,62

93,47

Source* Ohio Workforce Development Report

Why did we need intervention?

• Perkins Performance Measures

Academic Attainment-Mathematics

82

80

78

PRJVSD

STATE

88

86

84

94

92

90

92,09

83,73

2007-08

83,73

92,09

91,68

85,22

2008-09

85,22

91,68

2009-10

88,38

92,21

92,21

88,38

Source* Ohio Workforce Development Report

Why did we need intervention?

• Perkins Performance Measures

Student Graduation Rates

105

100

95

90

85

80

93,38

83,08

75

PRJVSD

STATE

2007-08

83,08

93,38

2008-09

90,56

94,63

Source* Ohio Workforce Development Report

94,63

90,56

98,55

98,92

2009-10

98,92

98,55

Why did we need intervention?

Star Reading

Reading Levels 2010-2011 Juniors

0-5.9

22%

9 -12.9+

35%

6 -8.9

43%

Why did we need intervention?

• Star Math

Math Levels 2010-2011 Juniors

0-5.9 21.04%

9 -12.9+ 47.60%

6 -8.9, 31.37%

Identification of Problems that were limiting student success

1) Need to maximize instructional time in the classroom

• Shorter days than comprehensive

• Curricular activities-Career-Technical Organizations, field trips, assemblies, etc.

2) Schedule- Increased academic requirements, students had no study halls.

• Credit deficiencies

• OGT remediation

3) Intervention- Students w/disabilities and OGT only received tutoring

4) Professional Development

• No longer contractual

• No waiver days

DELAY

SCHEDULES

CTSO

SCHEDULES

Skills USA

DECA

FEA

BPA

FCCLA

FFA

What it looks like now

• Minimized interruptions for delays

• Students see every teacher, every day

• Lab and academics teachers have greater opportunity to communicate and collaborate.

INTERVENTIONS

Strategies for providing interventions

LAB LOCKOUT

LEARNING LAB

MENTORING

TUTORING

READING

INTERVENTIONS

LAB

LOCKOUT

• 1 st attempt – Catch up Café

• 2 nd attempt – Lab Lockout 2x week

• 3 rd attempt- Current model

Student Survey

6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

9%

8%

7%

Often failed to complete or turn in assignments

9%

Often

3%

FY12 FY14

90%

85%

80%

75%

70%

65%

60%

Student Survey

Teacher sometimes or often care about me enough that they will not let me get by without doing the work.

85%

79%

FY12 FY14

INTERVENTIONS

LEARNING LAB

History:

• Small room away from mainstream instruction

• Two new Vocational Special Education coordinators and Special Services Supervisor

• Increased service delivery; space issues

• Learning the ropes

INTERVENTIONS

LEARNING LAB

First Move

• Slight adjustment of location; still not in the mainstream

• Students became more aware of extra help

• Culture change; HSTW Extra Help Committee

Chair

INTERVENTIONS

LEARNING LAB

Second Move:

• Visit to Green County CTC

• Continued culture of change

• Moved into the mainstream environment (Media Center)

• Students accepting extra help are increasing

• Special education label use is avoided

• Teacher assigned to learning lab

OLD

SPACE

NEW

INTERVENTIONS

LEARNING LAB

Major Renovation:

• Redesign learning lab

• Culture of accepting help is in full swing

• Teacher collaboration/increased staff communication

• Safe place; Game Plan Coordinator

• Computer lab for VLA/ credit recovery

• Increased student activity in lab

INTERVENTIONS

LEARNING LAB

Special Education:

• District Reps/parents meet in learning lab area

• Accommodations provided in a normalized school environment

• Increased acceptance of students with disabilities by staff

• Increased staff collaboration

• Increased student success

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

Teachers reported that they: Require students who are not performing at a C level or above to receive extra help at least once a week.

35%

29%

FY12 FY14

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

Students reported that it is very important to participate actively in class.

89%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

90%

80%

70%

60%

58%

FY12 FY14

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

Students reported that they often were able to get extra help from their teachers when they needed it without much difficulty.

55%

60% 45%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

FY12 FY14

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

INTERVENTIONS

Tutoring

1 st Try

• Replaced traditional administrative duties

• Schedule shared with staff, students sent to classroom.

2 nd Try

• Common pass system

• Teachers report to LL

• Schedule of teacher available by period/subject.

INTERVENTIONS

MENTORING

The Believe Network would link secondary and adult education staff with at-risk, special needs, and identified students in order to create a mentorship program that would allow one-on-one contact between staff members and the students. The program would provide networking opportunities, personal connections, goal setting, and a climate of support. The expectation would be that the staff member and the student would make contact at least once a week.

• First year

• Quarterly meetings during common planning time used to review progress

• Student referrals and available mentor shared online via google docs

READING INTERVENTIONS

SILENT SUSTAINED READING

Making use of staggered bus schedules

• USE FIRST 10 MINUTES OF DAY

First bus arrive before 8 am.

Tardy bell rings 8:24 am

Last bus arrive by 8:35

• USE LAST 15 MINUTES OF DAY

Teachers reported that they: Require students to read at least three books or their equivalent, other than the textbook, on average for each class they teach.

35%

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

13%

FY12 FY14

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

90%

80%

70%

60%

Teachers reported that they: Require students to read an assigned book or article and demonstrate understanding of the content at least once a semester.

84%

68%

FY12 FY14

INTERVENTIONS

• Math Design Collaborative

• Pre-assessment – Grouping students by common misconceptions

• Questioning is used to facilitate student learning.

• Students become facilitators to each other .

Professional

Development

Adoption of HSTW

Leadership team meetings

Committee meetings

Use of available time

High Schools That Work

• Leadership Team

• Meets monthly

• Uses

Emergency/planned subs

• Committees

• Meets monthly

• Uses AM planning time

Professional Development

• Shortened supervisor meeting to allow for professional presentation

• Carved out time during first day for staff.

• Utilize Snow Days

• Before/After School

• Schedule shift on non student days

• Generous professional leave

• One-on-one

Progress

Student Passage Rate

% of students who passed ALL courses

90,0%

89,0%

88,0%

87,0%

86,0%

85,0%

84,0%

83,0%

82,0%

Ряд1

84,6%

FY11-12

84,6%

86,5%

FY12-13

PASSAGE RATE

86,5%

89,4%

FY13-14

89,4%

Students reported that the extra help they received often helped them to get better grades.

40%

42%

40%

38%

36%

34%

32%

30%

28%

37%

26%

FY12 FY14

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

Teachers reported meeting with other teachers in their department or school to align assignments and agree upon what student work looks like below, at or above grade-level

(college- and career-ready-level) at least once a year.

39%

40%

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

16%

5%

0%

FY12 FY14

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

Raising Expectations and Providing Extra Help

FY12 FY14

35%

35%

30%

29%

26%

13%

Require student read at least three books or their equivalent, other thatn the textbook, on average for each class they teach

Require students who are not performing at a C level or above to receive extra help at least once a week.

Stongly agree that the teachers in their school maintain a demanding yet supportive environment that pushes students to do their best.

Quality Career/Technical Studies

97%

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

31%

46%

87%

68%

81%

80%

94%

The percentage of career/technical student responses on eight indicators that suffest the schoo has an intensive emphasis on quality cereer/technical studies.

Students reported that they were encouraged to take a combination of academic and career/technical courses.

Students reported that they had challenging assignments I their career/technical classes at least monthly.

Students reported that they completed a prject that first required some research and a written plan before completing the task in their career/technical classes at least once a semester.

FY12

FY14

FY12

FY14

Percentage of Students Meeting

HSTW Readiness Goals

HSTW Readiness Goals

50%

45%

40%

35%

30%

25%

20%

40%

47%

27%

37% 37%

33%

2012

2014

15%

10%

5%

0%

Reading Mathematics Science

Source: 2012, 2014 High Schools That Work Assessment of Reading, Mathematics and Science, HSTW Teacher Survey Report.

QUESTIONS?

Presenters

• Verdie Williams verdie.williams@pickawayross.com

• Kevin Krebs kevin.krebs@pickawayross.com

• Scott Snyder scott.snyder@pickawayross.com

• Dana Anderson dana.anderson@pickawayross.com

Pickaway Ross Career & Technology Center www.pickawayross.com

895 Crouse Chapel Rd.

Chillicothe, OH 45601

740-642-1200

Download