Internal affairs by Ruud van der Ploeg

advertisement
EMTA
Internal affairs
Progress report
General Meeting Vilnius
October 15, 2015
1
EMTA Internal affairs
•
•
Records of
Decisions
European level
•
•
Membership
Membership
•
Enlargement
••
Foreseen
Surveys
Activities
2011
Working
groups
•
•
Approval Record of Decisions Oslo (20-21 May 2015)
•
Membership issues: 24 members and 1 Partner institution Montreal
• Enlargement (full membership)
- Manchester (TfGM): applied for full membership
The representative of Manchester is invited to make a pitch on his membership.
-
Zaragoza (CTAZ ): has decided to apply on initiative Barcelona
GVA Valencia (..): will be approached after regional elections.
Metropolitan Union Gdansk-Gdynia-Sopot (PL): declined (too small)
Please notify the Secretary when you meet with prospect PTA’s in your region.
2
EMTA FINANCIAL MATTERS
2nd Revised budget 2015
•
Financial
results 2015
Net result expected (€ + 32,250)
EMTA reserves dropped to € 72,380 (2014), now gone up to € 104,000
Overall expenses: € 149,000 (vs € 154,337 in 2014)
• Overhead charges: €120,700
• Surveys:
€ 15,000
• Seminars / visits: € 4,500
• Communication: € 8,050
(budget approved: €125,700).
(budget approved € 18,000)
(budget approved € 3.000)
(budget approved € 9,000)
Revenues : € 147,000 member fees + other (advance CIPTEC € 34 k)
Total revenues (achieved): € 174,000 (expected € 182,000)
New reserves estimated: € 103,000 (2015 1st revised € 66,800)
2nd revised budget 2015 Figures
Forecast budget 2016
•
Financial
prognosis
2016
Overall expenses: € 152,000 :
• Overhead charges: €120,700 steady
• Surveys:
€ 15,000 steady
• Seminars / visits: € 10,000 more travel costs - CIPTEC meetings • Communication: € 6,300 less expenses by digital issues
Variety in revenues
in GM Rotterdam: raise fee 2016 by € 500 if less than 3 new members by
the end of 2015 (by now only one new member , perhaps 2 soon). If
raise by € 500 the prognosis on revenues is € 166k (net result +€14 k)
If we decide not to raise fees, revenues will be € 153k (net result + € 2k)
Reserves will remain positive around estimated: €118k versus € 105 k.
The board proposes either to
a) refrain from the raise of fees in 2016, or
b) decide to raise the fee with € 500
Proposed budget 2016– 6500€
Proposed budget 2016– 6000€
European Commission Transport Policy
October 2 informal meeting with DG MOVE (team of mrs Daniela Rosca) and “city networks”
(EUROCITIES, TfL, POLIS, CeMR)
Exchange on the current situation in the implementation of the 2013 Urban Mobility Package, as well as
on the work related to the Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure
and the Clean Vehicles Directive 2009/33/EC and their impact on urban mobility.
I recall 8 out of 10 points that were discussed:
•EU financial opportunities for sustainable urban mobility and Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning –
Isabelle Maës
•Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and Sustainable Transport
Forum – José Fernandez Garcia
•Clean vehicles directive 2009/33/EC and Access regulations guidelines – Kemal Onel
•Urban logistics guidelines – Mans Lindberg
•Road safety existing challenges in urban areas and injuries data – Maite Sanz Villegas
•Multimodal Travel Information Services Specifications – Stephanie Leonard
•Urban ITS Standardisation Mandate – Julie Rafaillac
•Update on other Institutions current actions in the field of urban mobility – Marcello Beltrami Piaggio
8
European Commission Transport Policy
Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning
• UMP end of 2013: annex on how such a plan should be developed and how to deployed. Extensive
guide to help cities build up develop and implement SUMPs
• Action 1: set up a platform on SUMPs; external grouping of EU funding of project CIVITASENDURANCE SOLUTIONS helpingwith the development of a SUMP.
• Try to offer trainees for cities at SUMPs. 400 people from 150 citiesreceive training.
• Organise a European conference on SUMPs 2014 in Sopot 2015 in Bucharest. Next one coming up
(Bremen?).
• Setting up of an expert group on urban mobility. Meets 2x a year.
2 meetings already: kick start. Presentation and in-depth discussion on cycling (ECF, Austria)
inspiration to enhance cycling in their territory. Aim is to mobilise the national level to give beter
support to local representatives.
• On car sharing expertise hired from the NL. 3rd topic: how some countries put tools in place to help
development of SUMP. Spain: national funding to how to take up SUMP.
• City of Bremen: results on what can be achieved. Have been invitations sent out to some of us.
DG MOVE Urban mobility plans
EU financial opportunities
A document on the financial opportunities will be circulated. Many options only relevant for large projects.
Cities will be asked to bundle and group their projects. Go to financial options as one. List of 10 financing options:
1.European Structure Funds and investment funds (2014-2020): 12 billion Euro. Grants given to MS. 24 of 28 MS
are involved. Get in touch with your countries government. Partnership agreements.
JASPERS: platform to help applicants to draw up applications. Regional development. EU-cohesion funds.
2.CEF ((linked to TEN-T—>) € 50 mio available on "urban nodes” in total and €50 mio for Cohesion countries.
3.EIB (loans and garantuees)
4.a. ELENA, b. JESSICA (co financing projects on urban developments: MS to decide).
5.INTERREG VB (Europe) (co-financing) working with calls
6.URBACT III
7.LIFE, all covered by the urban agenda.
8.H2020: more type of projects than before. MG. 5.1.4. calls. 2014-2015 500 mio € is spent on urban mobility.
9.EFSI: Juncker plan on EU investments, employment: guarantees additional investment on public and private on
all areas. Advisory group installed. EFSI is devised to drive forward private investments.
Urban mobility is not the easiest area to have private funding and assess the ROI. UMP more domain of public
funding. List of banks in MS that from (EFSI) can be financed. Advisory hub to help cities make their projects.
10.Hydrogyn fuel cell and hydrogen under (JTI).
Important for CEF stakeholders
Save the date – 2015 CEF Transport Info Day – 30 November 2015
The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) will organise a Connecting Europe
Facility (CEF) Transport Info Day for CEF Transport stakeholders and beneficiaries
on Monday 30 November 2015 at the Charlemagne building in Brussels, Belgium.
The event will address the priorities of the 2015 CEF Transport Calls, expected to be opened
by the beginning of November 2015.
The aim of the Info Day is to allow prospective applicants for these calls to gat
her all the available information they will be able to use in preparation of their proposal.
Participants will be able to interact directly with Agency and European Commission staff as
well as with fellow CEF stakeholders.
https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/news-events/events/2015-cef-transport-info-day
Registrations to this event will only be possible through the Agency’s website, open later
during October.
EU Legislation: the Fourth Railway Package
A modification of the PSO regulation is currently examined in the frame of the Fourth Railway
Package. Main impacts of the PSO Regulation 1370/2007 :
•
A
European
legislative
framework
developments
•
Working
Groups
•
Foreseen
Activities 2011
•It makes public service contracts almost compulsory,
•Establishes a minimum content for these public service contracts,
•Defines rules on the way contracts should be awarded, limiting options for direct award
•Defines the way compensation for fulfilment of public service obligations are calculated.
Main objective of the on-going legislative procedure: enable the opening of the domestic
passenger rail markets to competition.
Debate is continued among Council, European Parliament and the Commission.
Three key issues emerge:
-granting open access rights and conditions of their introduction,
-additional measures to ensure non-discriminatory access to the network,
-introducing the principle of competitive award for public service contracts for rail and
conditions of its introduction.
Stakeholders UITP-EMTA object: the regulation creates uncertainty among commissioning
authorities that fear that the principle rule of tendering may disrupt the existing equilibrium
in the public service contracts between urban authorities and their operators.
Modifications should be limited to the minimum changes that are strictly necessary to open
domestic rail passenger markets to competition. Legal insecurity should be avoided.
12
Intelligent transport systems
•
Public
consultation
Public consultation for ITS Directive 2010/40/EU priority action (a) 'the
provision of a EU-wide multimodal travel information services’.
•The European Commission launched a public consultation on Provision of EU-wide
multimodal travel information services under the ITS Directive 2010/40/EU in September.
The objective of this consultation is to collect the opinions of stakeholders and interested
parties including EU citizens and private and public organisations and gain (quantitative)
evidence on the issues related to the provision of EU-wide multimodal travel information
services.
Goal: preparing a delegated act within the ITS Directive regarding the provision for EU-wide
multimodal travel information. Check out this
link:http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its/consultations/2015-its-mmtips_en.htm
Consultation period still open: 2/09/2015 – 24/11/2015
A stakeholder workshop is jointly organised between DG MOVE, TRL, TTR and Arup in
Brussels on the 4th of November. invitation letter by mrs Kopczyenska is available with me.
Request to complete a questionnaire before going to this workshop.
Register via the DG MOVE event homepage before October 28.
Check out: https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/its-mmtips/
A message sent on October 1 to members from the former ITS-working group (ZTM, VOR,
STIF). No responses so far.
13
Latest on the 4RWP
•
Fourth
Railway
Package:
Council’s
position
on the
market
pillar
The European Council on 8 October 2015 agreed on two proposals to liberalise domestic rail
passenger services and strengthen the governance of railway infrastructure, which together
form part of the so-called market (or political) pillar of the fourth railway package.
The proposals will allow train companies non-discriminatory access to rail networks in all EU
countries to run domestic passenger services, either in open access or by bidding for PSO (Public
Service Obligation) contracts.
•The Council agreed that competitive tendering should be the main rule for awarding public
service contracts, although certain exceptions - regarding small markets or to ensure ‘the longterm continuity’ of public rail transport services - will enable PSO contracts to be awarded
directly.
•The deadlines in the European Council’s position are longer than in the Commission’s proposal:
it means that the direct award of PSO contracts without justification will still be possible for 10
years after the regulation enters into force. Existing, directly awarded public service contracts
would be allowed to run until they expire.
Check out the EC press release
For more content of the proposals of the Council check
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/10/08-railway-market-openingand-governance/.
• On 3 December 2015, UITP organises a conference in Brussels,
”Public Service Contracts for Rail and Road Passenger Services: Where do we stand?"
•If you are interested to join, check this link http://www.uitp.org/europeanconference
14
Horizon 2020: CIPTEC
Collective Innovation for Public Transport in European Cities
•
•
European
research&
innovation
programm
es
The CIPTEC Consortium consists of:
•Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh)
•Catholic University of Leuven (KUL)
•Mobycon BV
•Tero Ltd
•MEMEX
•White Research
•Ortelio Ltd
•Metropoolregio Rotterdam Den Haag (MRDH)
•Tiemme SpA
•TraffiQ (Lokal Nahverkehrsgesellsch Frankfurt am Main)
•European Passengers’ Federation (EPF)
•EMTA
Greece
Belgium
The Netherlands
Greece
Italy
Belgium
United Kingdom
The Netherlands
Italy
Germany
Belgium
France
Project Coordination: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh) Prof. Aristotelis Naniopoulos
EMTA participation in Work Packages 1, 2 Input: 7 MM, project runs 36 months.
Focus on M1- M2: Analytical work on categorization of PT-o’s and typology of PT-a’s.
15
Management
structure (1/2)
 PM: Periodic Progress Report (PR) and a Final Report (FR)
 SC: Review procedures
 Decisions within the project made by common agreement
 Resolution in good faith of any dispute arisen
 Project Consortium Meetings (some of them combined with workshops)
CIPTEC kick-off meeting, Thessaloniki 14-15
May 2015
16
Deliverables due by the next 6 months
1
WP1 Market & societal trends & needs
T1.1 Societal & market trends
T1.2 Customers’ groups & users’ needs
T1.3 PT Agencies & needs analysis
T1.4 Validating findings
WP2 Existing innovation
T2.1 Existing innovation
T2.2 Innovation from other sectors
T2.3 Validating findings
WP3 Collective intelligence
T3.1 Collective intelligence framework
T3.2 Crowdsourcing
WP7 Management
T7.1 Technical Management
T7.2 Administrative Management
WP8 Capitalisation
T8.1 Dissemination
T8.2 Online marketing
T8.3 Exploitation plan
T8.4 Data management
2
3
MONTH
4
5
6
D1.1
7
8
..10
D1.2
D1.3
D2.1
D2.2
D2.3
D3.1
M1
D8.1
D7.1
M6
D8.2
17
Deliverables due by the next 6 months
M4
M5
M6
M6
D1.1 Report on major market trends, the effect of societal trends on market,
and their influence on public transport (lead: MRDH)
D3.1 Collective intelligence conceptual framework & guidelines
(lead: Tero & WR)
D2.1 Guidelines for field research design and relevant material on existing
innovative practices (lead: MOB)
Project meeting in Frankfurt (traffiQ) 25-27 November
D2.2 Portfolio of public transport services and “products” targeted to the traditional and
new customer base, incorporating field research results (lead: MOB)
M8 D2.3 Portfolio of existing innovative supply from other transport systems or/and business
sectors, incorporating field research results (lead: MOB)
M10 D1.2 Report on analysis of customers’ groups and users’ needs per customer group
(lead: MRDH)
M10 D1.3 Report on PT Authorities & Operators’ mapping/typology and needs
M8
(lead: MOB)
18
CIPTEC Work Packages: EMTA roles and tasks
WP 1: the project’s basic term of reference (steered by MRDH);
• EMTA steers task 1.3: profiling PT-authorities and PT-operators and analysing their ‘needs’
D 1.3 (Report on PT-a and PT-o mapping typology and ‘needs’)
Contributor to steering task 1.2.(Customer analysis) and EPF steering task 1.4 (Validation of findings and needs)
D 1.4. Development of a workshop and interview guide and
D 1.5 Implementation of workshop, opt to combine with workshop in D 2.4.
WP2: Mobycon steers “Mapping and evaluation of existing innovative services + practices”
Contributor to task 2.3: Validation of findings on innovative supply in workshop
EMTA core tasks: Networking _Participation in workshops_Dissemination of results.
IMPORTANT !
Members will be asked to deliver input to an in-depth questionnaire (expected November) on
your organisations institutional set up, relationships with operators, methods of contracting and
financing services, incentives to innovate and ….. Your needs.
In May or June 2016: 3rd Project meeting organised by EMTA in Paris. In cooperation with STIF.
•
A
•
European
level
• European level
•
Membership
•• Publications
Surveys
and
deliverables
• Working
groups
EMTA deliverables
•E-news #54 Summer 2015
•EMTA Survey: ? Issues pending ….
•EMTA
Barometer:
Do
we
make
2013
data
a
new
(released
Barometer
Febr
for
•EMTA-website: City pages: only 6 of our members sent updates
•New EMTA Directory: opportunity to be devised gratuit (?)
Do we commit to this?
If so, updating of city pages has to be continued.
20
2015)
2014?
Queries and questionnaires
A high tide after Summer holidays:
•
EMTA member
questionnaires
•CRTM: input for study of transport fare systems (April 28 2015)
•BKK: bus accidents per million kilometres by cities/countries (June 25)
May – October 2015
•EMTA/Goudappel
•Kyoto University/EMTA
•HSL
•BKK
on Connectivity workshop (deadline Oct 7)
on fare systems (deadline October 30)
on CSS (deadline also October 30)
on low-floor buses (to 4 cities, ended today).
Remember the trade-off: if you ask SG to put out questions, you are
expected to present the outcome in a summary or report, to be published on
the EMTA website.
21
Collaboration and events
 International Transport Forum
Summit 2015, 27-29 May Leipzig
“Transport, trade and tourism. Mobility for a connected world.”
Check the link to the article “Getting more from city tourism
growth”
•
Events and
appearances
Cooperation with POLIS on a side-event during ITF Summit on May 29:
“Planning access for coach transport in Europe” in cooperation with
Amsterdam, Budapest and IRU.
See POLIS-EMTA - press release.
 POLIS Annual Conference, Brussels 18-20 November, Brussels
http://www.polisnetwork.eu/polisconference
22
EMTA Board elections
The General Assembly will have to elect members of the Board and vote
for a new President, in Vienna on October 10th 2013.
Candidates
Statutes article 8: “at the time of election the candidate holds
responsibilities in the organisation of transport within the Transport
Authority he represents”
•
Board
Elections
Voting
You have to be on the proxy list to bring a vote or have a signed mandate
The members of the board will serve a 2-year term (ending Autumn
2017).
Coming up next…. All candidates for a board position:
23
EMTA Board elections
EMTA board now consists of 5 members (including the chair).
7 candidates with a motivation letterand CV applied for a board position,
among which four already serve in the board:
-Ms Sophie Mougard (CEO STIF Paris), VP
-Ms Suvi Riethniemi (CEO HSL Helsinki)
-Mr Wolfgang Schroll (MD VOR Vienna), Treasurer
-Mr Lluis Alegre (Director ATM Barcelona)
3 new candidates applied:
-Mr Cesare Paonessa (CEO AMMR Torino-Piemonte)
-Mr Kalman Daboczi (CEO BKK Budapest)
-Ms Laura Delgado (CRTM Madrid- Head of International Affairs)
and provided TfGM was voted “Ye”s for new member today:
•mr Jon Lamonte (CEO at Greater Manchester), as candidate
#8 for board membership.
•and as #9 candidate …. (word is with the chair)
Election procedure
General meeting is asked
• to agree all candidates are eligible
Y/N
Do you want to take a vote by secret ballot on every candidate? Y/N
• If yes, bring your votes to the respective candidates (ballots ready)
• If no, can we applaud thenew board members?
Congratulations to all Board members elect
We are not quite there yet……
Mr. Inskip is leaving as president of EMTA ……
…but who is to take over the leadership baton
to be president for the next 2 years?
After I ascertained no candidates had applied within the official
term…
…until yesterday, when a presidential candidate came forward:
mr Wolfgang Schroll (Managing Director Vienna Eastern Region)
That’s it!
Thank you for your kind attention!
Questions, remarks……?
Download