Chapter
1
Dr. Richard Ott
ACCTG 833, Fall 2007
Statutory authorities
Administrative authorities
Judicial authorities
Slide D3-2
Lower Courts
U.S. Tax Court
(formerly Board of Tax Appeals)
U.S. District Courts
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
(formerly U.S. Claims Court)
Appellate Courts
U.S. Courts of Appeal
U.S. Supreme Court
Slide D3-4
Slide D3-5
See examples of proper citations for court cases in the Prentice Hall textbook
Check for appeals (possibly reversals)
Check changes in underlying IRC sections
Check for an IRS acquiescence or nonacquiescence for the case
Lower Courts
Slide D3-7
Court hears only federal tax cases
Judges are tax specialists
Generally, best court for technical tax issues
No jury trials allowed
Jurisdiction is not limited to residents of any specific geographical region
Taxpayer does not have to pay the disputed amount before going to court
Slide D3-8
Precedents the Court follows:
Supreme Court decisions
Court of Appeals decisions (Golsen Rule)
U.S. Tax Court decisions
Golsen Rule
Follows the decisions of the Court of Appeals having jurisdiction over the taxpayer
May reach opposite conclusions for taxpayers with identical facts from different jurisdictions
Slide D3-9
Courts hear all types of federal cases
Judges are generalists, not tax specialists
Taxpayer can request a jury trial
Many decisions are poorly structured or poorly conceived from a technical standpoint
Jurisdiction is geographically limited
Taxpayer must pay the disputed amount and then sue the government for a refund
(taxpayer is petitioner, IRS is respondent)
Precedents the Court follows:
Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for that District
Own District Court
Slide D3-10
Slide D3-11
Court hears all cases involving monetary claims against the federal government
Judges are generalists (not tax specialists)
No jury trials allowed
Jurisdiction is not limited to residents of a any specific geographical region
Taxpayer must pay the disputed amount and then sue the government for a refund
(taxpayer is petitioner, IRS is respondent)
Slide D3-12
Precedents Court must follow:
Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Taxpayers usually pursue cases in this court when applicable District Court and/or
Tax Court decisions are adverse
Appellate Courts
Slide D3-14
First level
U.S. Court of Appeals
Final level
U.S. Supreme Court
13 Courts of Appeal
11 geographic courts assigned to states
(Kansas is 10 th and Missouri is 8 th )
1 court assigned to Washington, D.C.
1 court assigned to cases coming from the
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Precedents the Court follows:
Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeal for that circuit
Slide D3-15
Slide D3-16
Final level of appeal and sovereign legal authority for all federal cases
Permission to present case must be requested by writ of certiorari (may or may not be granted)
Only hear about a dozen tax cases annually
Tax cases generally involve an issue at conflict among the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal or an issue of major importance
Slide D3-18
The Internal Revenue Code is the law as enacted by Congress and signed by the
President, therefore, carries the highest weight of authority
Slide D3-19
Treasury Regulations carry the second highest weight of authority
Supreme Court has held that regulations issued under general authority of IRC § 7805(a) have full force and effect of law unless they conflict with the current statute
Supreme Court has held that regulations issued under specific legislative authority have the full force and effect of law (unless in conflict with
Congressional intent)
Slide D3-20
In general, these provide good indications of the IRS’s position but they are frequently revised and/or superceded and can be overturned by court decisions
If there is a supporting court case with a high weight of authority, taxpayer can take a position contrary to an administrative pronouncement
PLRs and TAMs carry a lower weight of authority than Revenue Rulings or Procedures
Slide D3-21
Supreme Court cases carry the highest weight next to the Internal Revenue Code, their decisions can only be changed if:
Congress amends the underlying statutes or
The Court decides to reverse itself
Slide D3-22
Court of Appeals cases carry a high weight of authority but less than Supreme Court
If court decisions are in conflict across circuits, decisions in taxpayer’s own circuit have higher value as precedent than those of other circuits
2 nd , 9 th and D.C. circuit decisions are important due to numerous innovative, unusual and/or controversial judicial interpretations of law
Slide D3-23
Tax Court cases also carry a high weight of authority (but less than the Supreme Court), particularly when the issue has not been addressed by a Court of Appeals
U.S. Federal Court of Claims cases carry a significant weight of authority
U.S. District Court decisions carry a very low weight of authority (especially if the taxpayer is not in that district)
Slide D3-24
A taxpayer need not pay the disputed tax in advance when the suit is initiated in which lower court?
a. U.S. Court of Federal Claims
b. U.S. Tax Court
c. U.S. District Court
A jury trial is permitted in which court?
a. U.S. District Court
b. U.S. Tax Court
c. U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Slide D3-25
Slide D3-26
The Tax Court departs from its general policy of ruling uniformly for all taxpayers in what situation?
a. a U.S. District Court in the taxpayer’s jurisdiction has ruled differently on the issue
b. the IRS has issued a nonacquiescence to a previous court decision on the issue in the taxpayer’s jurisdiction
c. the Court of Appeals for the circuit to which the decision may be appealed has ruled differently on the issue
Slide D3-27
When the Tax Court follows the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals to which the taxpayer may appeal, the court is following what rule?
a. Goldberg Rule
b. Greenspan Rule
c. Golsen Rule
Slide D3-28
The IRS may issue an acquiescence or nonacquiescence to which of the following court decisions?
a. U.S. Tax Court
b. U.S. Courts of Appeal
c. U.S. Supreme Court
d. All of the above
e. a. and b. only
Slide D3-29
In researching a tax position to be taken by taxpayer: a Kansas taxpayer, you find the following
9 th Circuit Court of
Appeals decision sources for and against the position:
Tax Court decision
(California taxpayer)
Do you take the position?
For the Against the taxpayer:
8 th Circuit Court of Appeals decision
Tax Court decision
(Missouri taxpayer)
Private letter ruling Revenue Ruling