Business Process Management Way Beyond Workflow Roy Massie Director Enterprise Product Management SunGard EXP BPM - Way Beyond Workflow Agenda What does BPM look like? A Brief History of Business Process Management BPM from an ECM Perspective BPM Benefits, Challenges and Components Applications that are Enhanced by BPM Ex: Settling Overpayment Disputes A Very Brief History of Process Management Wave 1: Industrial Revolution: Functional silos Wave 2: 1980’s and 90’s BPR: Shake and bake Wave 2.5: Workflow: Less code dependence Wave 3: BPM: Big winners adapt processes What is BPM? Safe answer: Business Process Management Other names: Orchestration, POA… Entire organization is goal – some there now Serve the customer…Six Sigma, Kaizen, et al. Where are those V*#!o diagrams anyway? Tools for continuous improvement of process Monitor & maintain processes…consistently Mixing people and machines…more easily Isn’t BPM Just Workflow? Could’ve, would’ve, should’ve…but didn’t BPM –> M is for management Machines are people too – Strong EAI component influences BPM Modeling, simulation Performance Dashboards are a natural fit Empower BAs, reduce “baked-in” IT processes BPM incorporates both workflow and EAI Old Corporate Priority = Efficiency Goal is to Achieve Efficiency by Documenting, Standardizing and Optimizing Business Processes New Corporate Priority = Efficiency and Compliance Must be able to identify any document or data – from anywhere in the workflow process – and automatically retain or destroy based on corporate guidelines Some Flavors of Workflow in BPM Predictable: BA designs the flow – Rules engine/designer Answer yes or no… Statements and/or grids – Graphical Process Designer Flow cuts across/through organizational landscape Rules usually play a supporting role Unpredictable: Circumstance dictates the flow – Ad-hoc workflow Preserve accountability at every stage End customer can be told status no matter how messy Example of a rule…a good thing Brief Demo Example of a BPM engine… SunGard EXP Process Director Proforma Simulation ProVision Integration – Staffing the “What If” Process Proforma Staff “What-if” summary Proforma Cost “What-if” summary ProVision Integration – Export process to Process Director ProVision and BPM Engine are mutually independent, but can interop Analysts can create, simulate in lab-environ Export utility sketches/updates PD map for you Sketch precisely matches the process proven in “What-if” simulator Connect map to work queues insuring deployment of the analyzed process Barriers and Remedies for Workflow/BPM Adoption Start with a pilot, spread benefits organically Cultural changes in the organization Locate a process, not just a department Analysts, analysts….analysts Find all the process-thinkers you already have Who has successfully worked but in multiple areas? Integration is implied, still not Good mid-managers often think this way trivial Stay close term to standards, use your Short pressure vs. vendors invest in If necessary, show a “near-death” experience long term BPM Engine Technology Options Partner/Buy – Experienced vendor – Most are skilled in specific industries/processes, not all – Most allow customization Be aware and beware of BPM standards – Several layers and competing standards – BPMN (notation) has traction, a bit technical. Likely winner of its niche – BPEL (execution) popular but incomplete, good alternatives exist Build solution on your own – Not from scratch ! – On top of jBPM, MS WWF, etc. Recommended Reading for BPM Business Process Management: The Third Wave, Smith & Fingar Workflow Modeling Tools for Process Improvement and Application Development, Sharp & McDermott Workflow Handbook (2001-2005), WfMC www.BPTrends.com (2005 BPM Suites Rpt) www.brsilver.com