PRESENTATION IT PMO Charter Communication Document August, 2008 Agenda IT Program Management Office – Core Competencies – IT Governance and the PMO – PMO Pyramid, “hierarchy of needs” – PMO Models available – Planning • Demand Management • Project Management Methodology – Communication • Project Performance Metrics • Status Reporting – Administration 1 Our multi-layered governance structure will streamline decision making and improve transparency and control of IT Governance Body Governance Level Design not completed Objective 1 IT Steering Committee CEO, CFO, CIO, BU presidents Govern DII IT strategy, funding allocation and investments 2 IT Leadership Team CIO and direct reports Govern day-to-day IT operations 3 IT Project Portfolio Committee PMO, Program Managers, Business Liaisons Govern the project portfolio and project execution 4 Functional Process Teams Enterprise Architects, Business Functional leads, system leads Govern enterprise architecture and standardization 5 Change Control Board Infrastructure tower leads, system leads Govern changes to the IT production environment IT Steering Committee Doosan IT Council Membership IT Mgmt Project Management and Delivery Technical and Business Committees 2 Program Management encompasses several components of IT Governance which are critical to a smooth running IT department * * * Areas that can be effectively managed by a Program Management Office 3 The success of a PMO requires success in base-level competencies before results from advanced competencies can be achieved. PMO Maturity exists in layers that are building blocks to the next level of maturity At the foundation, a PMO must be able to produce accurate status reports on projects. The next foundational element is developing people who can execute projects and understand the benefit that comes from repeatable, lean process methodologies. The aforementioned building blocks allow an organization to adopt processes and methodologies to improve project execution and likelihood of achieving promised business benefits. 4 The charter of the PMO is to be the “center of excellence” for program management which includes the following three areas… DII IT PMO Charter Planning Planning begins with the determination of what IT investments the business will pursue in the coming year. The PMO is required to orchestrate project demand through project funding The PMO helps plan during project execution by establishing methodologies and repeatable processes Communications within the IT group include holding regular all-employee meetings, IT PMO meetings, and intra-program meetings. Communication Administration Communications beyond IT include monthly CC CIO team progress sharing and executive communications including the PMO dashboard and TSA elimination dashboard Financial administration is a key component of tracking IT Investments. The PMO will handle PO requisitioning and invoice processing for all outside IT spend. The PMO will handle meeting planning and large event coordination as needed for the IT department. 5 Planning is the first PMO core competency. The PMO is responsible for coordinating the selection and funding of IT initiatives across all DII businesses: – Search out all demand for new IT projects – Initiate sessions with IT-Business review session to determine projects with greatest alignment to LRP – Pull together final IT capital plans for each business, make adjustments to meet AOP stretch targets The PMO is responsible to work within IT to determine a standard project management methodology which enforces repeatable efficient processes – Methodologies will be developed with grass-roots support to encourage adoption Build a culture of respect for project management as a discipline – Organize training and certification programs for people involved with project management – Work with IT Leadership team to build PM training into their teams development plans 6 Demand Management is the first step in selecting which projects will be funded Project Requests LRP Filter AOP Filter Business Management IT Project Portfolio IT Management Frontline Workers Project Ideas will outnumber the number that can be funded Business – IT Councils force-rank Projects for Alignment to LRP objectives AOP Challenge Is applied and Further eliminates projects Final IT Project Portfolio and Capital Plan Achieved 7 The PMO will ensure that projects are executed in a disciplined and structured manner Project Management Methodology Phase 1 G1 Plan Develop initial business case and create project charter Identify and engage Project Stakeholders and Requirements Providers. Develop and document Preliminary Project Plan, which covers plan for Define phase activities Conduct tollgate review Phase 3 G3 CER Approval Phase 4 G4 Test Construct Define Charter Approval Initiate and transition project from concept stages into IT Project development G2 Phase 2 Approve for Test Go/No Go Develop business requirements Conduct Construct-phase kickoff Develop systems requirements Develop architecture design Develop high level architecture design Develop detailed design Conduct user acceptance testing Develop data migration strategy plan Conduct site readiness review Develop test plans Analyze defect and change requests Define deployment strategy Initiate RFP / RFQ process Conduct make/buy/reuse analysis Refine business case Conduct tollgate review Complete system / site deployment plan Code and unit test Phase 5 G5 Deploy Project Close-Out Conduct system testing Migrate to new system Conduct data migration testing Update site deployment materials and system documentation Transition to operations De-install legacy systems Verify release readiness Conduct tollgate review Conduct tollgate review Close project Configure, integrate, and deliver system Setup QA environments Conduct tollgate review 8 The Plan/Define deliverables build upon each other to culminate in the ultimate Plan/Define milestone – a completed and signed CER Business Requirements Document Fund/No Fund Decision Project Charter The project charter sign-off is the official beginning of the project G2 G1 System Requirements Specification Project Plan Technical Architecture Specification CER (signed) CER Comments If Necessary Build/Buy Analysis RFP/RFQ Plan/Define documentation serves as the “building blocks” for the CER Plan/Define documentation forces project teams to “plan the project” The objective is to gain efficiency from a repeatable methodology, while allowing the project teams the flexibility to manage time and resources In order for a CER to be approved the Plan/Define documentation must be completed 9 Communication is the second PMO core competency. The PMO’s core competency remains in reporting project and program status to the business – The PMO dashboard and TSA Scoreboard for summarizing extensive project detail – The PMO coordinates and facilitates meetings across stakeholder communities: - All IT Employee Meeting - Information Exchange with CC CIO team (Seoul) - Ad-hoc updates to executive leadership The PMO team organizes and facilitates weekly, program-wide and IT-wide program status meetings in the areas of: – ERP and DMS (Dealer Management Systems) – IT Infrastructure and Facilities These meetings are the primary means of keeping communication alive across stakeholders within a certain IT discipline. 10 Throughout the project lifecycle we will track key project metrics - project milestone achievement, project cost, and quality of delivery Project Performance Metrics Time The Key milestones Cost Quality Estimated cost (and resources) for each project milestone Description of key project related issues Estimated and actual time for completion Actual cost expended The relative impact of key issues (high/med/low) Percent completion Invoiced cost Weightings of milestones towards project completion Corrective actions for estimated cost over-runs The project risks and associated escalation actions 11 IT Status Reporting Chile Implementation of Dynamics NAV - Issue Log Issue # Est. Issue Project Relevant Original Date Completion Status Priority @ Risk? Milestone/Task of Entry Date Escalation Action Issue Owner Issue Type Comments Closed High No Detailed Business Case 20-Feb-08 22-Feb-08 Escalate to PMO Mike Coogan Scope Change (CER) Medium NAV No - Budget DataData Conversion 18-Feb-08 21-Feb-08 None-Project Team To Clifford Booker Resource Constraint Chile ImplementationClosed of Dynamics Data Transfer - From SKC Resolve Closed High No Business Requirements 28-Feb-08 None-Project Team To Jorge Beals Resource Constraint Overall Budget Document (BRD) Resolve Total Incurred Total % Total Over Budget/On Hiring of Local Controller Total CER Expenses Incurred TeamInvoiced Closed Low No Other - N/ACurrency 18-Feb-08 4-Apr-08 None-Project To Jorge Beals Target? Vendor USD - United States Dollars 249,200 149,906 Resolve 60% 139,433 Under Budget Sourcing/Management Terms & Condition Review Closed High No High-level Architecture 18-Feb-08 4-Apr-08 None-Project Team To Javier Alcorta Other (Please Clarify in Testing Printer Testing Document Resolve Comments) Total Incurred Projected Closed Medium No Business Requirements 20-Mar-08 4-Apr-08 None-Project TeamExpenses To Jorge Beals Other (Please ClarifyNew in Hard getting fixed asset data Chile Implementation of Dynamics NAV Milestone Status Line Budgeted Expenses to Resolve Invoiced To Total DurationComments) Over/Under Estimated Document (BRD) Fixed Asset Data # CER Line Item CER Type Spend Date % Incurred Date (in months) Budget? Budget Corrective Action Open Low Nolicenses Transition to Support 20-Mar-08 30-Jul-08 Jorge Beals (Please Need to resolve how to store 5 1 31 MS Dynamics NAV Advanced user 38,496 None-Project 90% Team To 38,496 N/A - One Time Other Under BudgetClarify in One-Time License Purchase 42,600 Team Information Resolve years worth dataLimit for legal Sum0% of Milestone WeightsN/A w/in Phase Red of Zone 2 Server software (SQL, Citrix, Term) General Project - One Time Comments) One-Time License Purchase 19,000 Historical Data Archieve reasons 100% N/A - One Time Under Budget 14 Days of Dynamics NAV Projlicenses Name: Chile ImplementationOne-Time 3 30 Dysel ELC user 28,692 80%Plan/Define 28,692 License Purchase 36,000 Closed Medium No Business Requirements 20-Mar-08 4-Apr-08 None-Project Team To Jorge Beals Resource Constraint Coogan 100% Note: Based on 4 1 MS Dynamics Language moduleDocument 729 Resolve 91% 729 N/A - One Time Under Budget One-Time 800 Construct/Test ProjNAV Mgr Spanish (PM): Mike (BRD)License Purchase 5 Jet Reports Licenses 0% One-Time License Purchase 3,400 "Current Date - Orig Date" Deploy 100% N/A - One Time Availability of Super Users PM Phone #: 908-238-5820 6 31 MS Dynamics NAVEmail: Advanced user (1yr) 6,822 Escalate 99% 6,822 - One Time Resource Under Budget Ongoing SW Mntnc 6,900 Closed Medium Nomaintenance Systems Requirements 25-Mar-08 21-Apr-08 to Vendor CliffordN/A Booker Constraint ELC Latin America Spanish mike_coogan@diippa.com PM (SRS) Translation 7 Server software Citrix, Matt Term)Timmes maintenanceSpecification (1yr)Ongoing 0% N/A - One Time SW Mntnc 3,000 Proj(SQL, Sponsor: Translation Services 8 30 Dysel ELC user maintenance (1yr) 4,493 Yes 77% 4,493 N/A - One Time Under Budget Ongoing SW Mntnc 5,800 Yes No On Time: CER Signed: Closed Medium Business Requirements 7-Apr-08 31-May-08 None-Project Booker Need to add open transactional 9 Jet Reports maintenance (1yr) 0% Team To CliffordN/A - One Time Other (Please Clarify in Ongoing SW Mntnc 600 None Note: Adjust weights Document (BRD) Resolve Comments) data into the system. May need PM Status 10 Dysel - ELC translation (12 hours) 2,100 100% 2,100 1 On Target External Services 2,100 in each phase below to manually do this. Message: 11 Developer/Translation Services 7,500 25% 6,000 3 Under Budget External Services 30,000 Open Tranaction Data to = 100% 12 Statutory Reporting & Tax Compliance Testing 0% 1 External Services 10,000 Closed Medium No Business Requirements 4-Mar-08 3-Jun-08 None-Project Team To Mike Coogan Resource Constraint Other - N/A 1-Feb-08 08/01/08 13 Purchase local printers (laser to replace dot matrix) 0% N/A One Time Under Budget One-Time HW Purchase 11,000 Document (BRD) Resolve 19 Milestone/Task Chart of Account Mapping 14 Application Server 0% N/A - One Time One-Time HW Purchase 10,800 Line #High Weight Within OriginalUF Est. Current Est.Contracts Closed No Business Requirements 30-Apr-08 Escalate CliffordN/A Booker Currency - Rental 15 ACS WAN 0%to Vendor - One Time Vendor One-Time HW Purchase 20-Mar-08 11,300 -ANDPhase Milestone/Tas Completion Document (BRD)HW Purchase 16 Print Server 847 94% (Sum to 847 N/A - One Time Sourcing/Management Under Budget Completion One-Time 900 Foreign Currency for Rental Contracts Status Milestone/Task Description Project Phase 100%) Task Start Date k % Complete Date Date Chile Implementation of Dynamics NAV - Project Dashboard Issue Description 1 Version Choice 10 11 12 55,000 60,227 Plan/Define Plan/Define Plan/Define Plan/Define Plan/Define Plan/Define Construct/Test Construct/Test Construct/Test Construct/Test Construct/Test Construct/Test Construct/Test Construct/Test Deploy Deploy Deploy 110% 10% 15% 15% 15% 0% 45% 5% 12% 5% 20% 9% 11% 16% 22% 40% 40% 20% 51,254 1-Feb-08 1-Feb-08 15-Feb-08 22-Feb-08 29-Feb-08 18-Feb-08 3-Mar-08 22-Feb-08 29-Apr-08 22-Feb-08 17-Mar-08 28-Mar-08 21-Apr-08 14-Apr-08 1-May-08 4-Apr-08 5-May-08 3 Over Budget 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 65,000 25-Feb-08 29-Feb-08 29-Feb-08 29-Feb-08 29-Feb-08 29-Feb-08 14-Mar-08 15-Mar-08 1-May-08 28-Mar-08 15-Apr-08 15-Apr-08 25-Apr-08 18-Apr-08 1-May-08 11-Apr-08 15-May-08 DII_ERP_024 Replace dealer roster functionality - ESA DII_ERP_025 Global Retail Campaign Management DII_IFR_012 Siebel Replatforming Y Time Gantt Budget IT Dashboard External Services 75% Contribut ion 1.5% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 0.0% 6.8% 4.0% 9.6% 4.0% 16.0% 7.2% 8.8% 12.8% 17.6% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% Issues Milestone Completion Dates Budget by Category Budget Consumed 100% 17 Comments date to June 1st Extended implementation 29-Feb-08 4-Mar-08 4-Mar-08 4-Mar-08 29-Feb-08 21-Mar-08 30-Apr-08 18-Apr-08 23-Jun-08 28-Apr-08 Need to Review Service Set-ups 31-May-08 31-May-08 31-May-08 31-May-08 Finance & Servicing Training Needed 27-Jun-08 31-May-08 1-Aug-08 1-Jul-09 Links to Project Detail |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Historical PercentComplete Completion Historic Percent Project ID - Project % Go-Live Next Milestone & CER Date Name Complete Date Date DII_ERP_001.2 Hybris frontend for 7.1% 30-Sep-08 31-Mar-09 CER - 9/30/08 Utility ESA: Phase 1 DII_ERP_002 DIITC Cloning Prep & Clean 100.0% 30-Apr-08 21-Jul-08 Phase 1 Complete Up: Phase 1 DII_ERP_013 Geith Cleanup 5. Historical Data Archieve +0% +10% +20% +30% +40% +50% +60% +70% +80% +90% On/Under Budget (Y/N): Project Update Sheets – Timeline/Budget/Issues 17 T&E for internal resources (11 trips @ $5,000/trip) Internal Resources 1 Project Charter 18 2 Preliminary Project Plan 19 3 Business Requirements Document (BRD) 20 4 Systems Requirements Specification (SRS) 21 5 High-level Architecture Document 22 6 Detailed Business Case (CER) 23 7 Report Specifications 24 8 Data Conversion 25 9 Final Data Conversion 10 Setups 11 Report Development 12 Internal Testing 13 User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 14 Training 15 Go Live 16 User Manuals 17 Transition to Support Team 4. Credit Mgmt - Parent/Child Relationship 60% 10 2/29 - Project Charter 3/4 - Preliminary Project Plan 3/4 - Business Requirements Document (BRD) 3/4 - Systems Requirements Specification (SRS) 2/29 - High-level Architecture Document 3/21 - Detailed Business Case (CER) 4/30 - Report Specifications 4/18 - Data Conversion 6/23 - Final Data Conversion 4/28 - Setups 5/31 - Report Development 5/31 - Internal Testing 5/31 - User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 5/31 - Training 6/27 - Go Live 5/31 - User Manuals 33 40% One Time HW & SW Purch 56% 50% 69 HW Lease & SW Mntnc 25% 67 115 4% 0% Jul-08 9 Overall Project Percent Complete 99.0% Internal Resources (5) Incurred & Invoiced Sep-08 8 3. Localized Reporting Compliance Y Budget Consumed Comments Aug-08 7 +0% +10% +20% +30% +40% +50% +60% +70% +80% +90% Apr-08 6 1. Chile ERP System 1. Local Branch Resources 2. Trial Balance Upload 100% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| On-Time (Y/N): Jun-08 5 May-08 4 Associated TSA's Top 5 Issues Percent Completion Jan-08 3 Project: DII_DMS_001 (Chile Implementation of Dynamics NAV) Mar-08 2 Feb-08 28 Project Manager (PM): Mike Coogan PM Contact #: 908-238-5820 Total Budget Budget Incurred Over Budget $883,000 $30,833 N $388,860 $281,030 N Project Docs & CER - 1/1/09 $1,500,000 $0 N 2.3% 1-Jan-09 15.4% 30-Apr-08 31-Dec-08 User Mgmt Build 8/6/08 $237,000 $0 N 40.7% 25-Apr-08 31-Oct-08 Data Cleansing 8/15/08 $314,000 $157,980 N 99.8% 11-Apr-08 14-Jul-08 Close Siebel Contract w/ACS 7/31/08 $189,039 $175,818 N IT Executive Summary 60 Incurred, not invoiced (50) Budget Remaining Calendar Start Total Budget: $249,200 08 AOP: $175,000 PM E-mail Address: - Total Incurred 50 100 150 Budget Remaining PM Update: mike_coogan@diippa.com Issues None Status Trend *Identify Resources *The development of Milestones TBD 12 Administration is the final PMO core competency. The PMO will serve as the administrative arm of the IT department due to its visibility across strategic programs and operations The PMO will provide the following administrative services to the IT department: – CER processing and administration including creating “backup support” for capitalization – Handle PO creation and invoice routing. This should be for Opex and Capex on all US Oracle-based ledgers – Provide periodic budget vs. actual status reporting at a cost center level and per CER – Produce financial metrics for the IT-wide dashboard IT Department administration – Coordinate central administrative functions such as IT vacation and travel calendar – Handle IT’s procurement card (US) 13