Table 1: Assessment Matrix Foundation
Benchmark is met if 3 of the 4
2.1.1 Identify as a
professional social worker
and conduct oneself
accordingly
●
Advocate for client
access to the services of
social work
Course Assignment
80% earn a B or better on
the assignment
Advanced Stand
Course
80% earn a B or
better on the
assignment
Self-Assessment
80% at 3 or above on 5-point
scale (Mean and % at 3 or
above reported)
Field Evaluation
80% at 3 or above on 5-point
scale (Mean and % at 3 or
above reported)
Assessment Results
Social Welfare Policy II
Advocacy paper
99%
Advanced Standing
Critical thinking
paper
98%
M = 4.67
100%
3, 40
M = 3.71
94.7%
Benchmark met
M = 4.64
100%
61, 64, 70, 73, 77
M = 3.96
95.8 %
Benchmark met
M = 4.77
100%
1, 62, 68, 69
M = 3.99
98.4%
Benchmark met
●
Practice personal
reflection and self-correction
to assure continual
professional development
HBSE: Small Systems
Reading reflections
94%
●
Attend to
professional roles and
boundaries
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Ethics group project
99%
●
Demonstrate
professional demeanor in
behavior, appearance, and
communication
Social Welfare Policy II
Advocacy paper
99%
Advanced Standing
Critical thinking
paper
98%
M = 4.83
100%
63, 65, 67
M = 3.92
97.9%
Benchmark met
Fundamentals of Research I
Article review
97%
Advanced Standing
Critical thinking
paper
98%
Advanced Standing
Critical thinking
paper
98%
M = 4.70
100%
41, 59, 71, 72
M = 3.75
94.2%
Benchmark met
M = 4.58
100%
2, 60, 66
M = 4.06
98.6%
Benchmark met
●
Engage in careerlong learning
●
Use supervision and
consultation
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Ethics group project
99%
Advanced Standing
Critical thinking
paper
98%
Advanced Standing
Critical thinking
paper
98%
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
1
2.1.2 Ethical Principles
●
Recognize and
manage personal values in a
way that allows professional
values to guide practice
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Ethics group project
99%
Advanced Standing
Final Proposal
94%
M = 4.74
100%
74
M = 3.96
99.2%
Benchmark met
●
Make ethical
decisions by applying
standards of the National
Association of Social
Workers Code of Ethics…
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Ethics group project
99%
Advanced Standing
Final Proposal
94%
M = 4.74
100%
75
M = 4.07
99.2%
Benchmark met
●
Tolerate ambiguity
in resolving ethical conflicts
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Ethics group project
99%
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Advanced Standing
Final Proposal
94%
M = 4.35
100%
76
M = 3.76
97.7%
Benchmark met
Advanced Standing
Final Proposal
94%
M = 4.56
100%
4
M = 3.92
98.4%
Benchmark met
●
Distinguish,
appraise,
and integrate multiple sources
of knowledge, including
research-based knowledge,
and practice wisdom
Fundamentals of Research I
Literature review
97%
Advanced Standing
Article Critique
84%
M = 4.45
100%
78, 82
M = 3.59
92.7%
Benchmark met
• Analyze models of
assessment, prevention,
intervention, and evaluation
Fundamentals of Research II
Empirical article critique
100%
Advanced Standing
Article Critique
84%
M = 4.38
100%
79, 81
M = 3.95
98.4%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Large
System
Grant application
100%
Advanced Standing
Article Critique
84%
M = 4.58
100%
5, 6, 80
M = 3.77
96.2%
Benchmark met
●
Apply strategies of
ethical reasoning to arrive at
principled decisions
2.1.3 Critical Thinking
●
Demonstrate
effective oral and written
communication in working
with individuals, families,
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
2
groups, organizations,
communities, and colleagues
2.1.4 Engage Diversity
and Difference
●
Recognize the
extent
to which a culture’s structures
and values may oppress,
marginalize, alienate, or
create, or enhance privilege
and power
●
Gain sufficient self
awareness to eliminate the
influence of personal biases
and values in working with
diverse groups
●
Recognize and
communicate
their understanding of the
importance of difference in
shaping life experiences
●
View themselves as
learners and engage those
with whom they work as
informant
HBSE: Small Systems
Presentations on chapters
94%
Advanced Standing
Final Proposal
94%
M = 4.58
100%
8
M = 3.37
87.3%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Ethics group project
99%
Advance Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.58
100%
84
M = 3.76
98.4%
Benchmark met
HBSE: Small Systems
Presentation on chapters
94%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.70
100%
7, 83, 86
M = 3.92
98.1%
Benchmark met
Social Welfare Policy II
Policy analysis paper
97%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.64
100%
85
M = 3.61
94.4%
Benchmark met
HBSE Large Systems
Integrative paper 1
97%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.43
100%
42
M = 2.72
70.6%
Benchmark Met
2.1.5 Advance Human
Rights & Social and
Economic Justice
●
Understand the
forms and mechanisms of
oppression and
discrimination
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
3
●
Advocate for
human rights and social and
economic justice
Social Welfare Policy II
Advocacy paper
97%
Advanced Standing
Final Proposal
94%
M = 4.38
100%
9
M = 3.16
81.2%
Benchmark met
●
Engage in practices
that advance social and
economic justice
Social Welfare Policy I
Group project
99%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.32
100%
10
M = 3.58
91.8%
Benchmark met
Fundamentals of Research I
Literature review
97%
Advanced Standing
Logic model
100%
M = 4.29
100%
11, 43
M = 3.50
92.1%
Benchmark met
Fundamentals of Research II
Empirical article critique
97%
Advanced Standing
Logic model
100%
M = 4.29
100%
12
M = 3.42
93.3%
Benchmark met
2.1.6 Research
Informed Practice/
Practice Informed
Research
●
Use practice
experience to inform
scientific inquiry
●
Research evidence
to inform practice
2.1.7 Knowledge of Human
Behavior and Social
Environment
Benchmark met
●
Utilize conceptual
frameworks to guide the
processes of assessment,
intervention, and evaluation
HBSE Large Systems
Integrative paper II
97%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.4
100%
14, 44, 87
M = 3.64
91.8%
Benchmark met
●
Critique and apply
knowledge to understand
person and environment
HBSE: Small Systems
“Think piece”
94%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.58
100%
13, 45, 88
M = 3.44
88.3%
Benchmark met
Social Welfare Policy II
Policy analysis paper
97%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.25
100%
16, 46, 47
M = 3.45
91.5%
Benchmark met
2.1.8 Policy Practice –
Advance Social/Economic
●
Analyze, formulate,
and advocate for policies that
advance social well-being
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
4
●
Collaborate with
colleagues And clients for
effective policy Action
Social Welfare Policy II
Policy analysis paper
97%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.38
100%
15, 48, 49, 89
M = 3.33
84.3%
Benchmark met
●
Continuously
discover, appraise, and attend
to changing locales,
populations, scientific and
technological developments,
and emerging societal trends
to provide relevant services
Social Welfare Policy I
Descriptive analysis of
legislation
99%
Advanced Standing
Paper on learning
group
100%
M = 4.35
100%
17, 50, 51, 90
M = 3.45
90.9%
Benchmark met
●
Provide leadership
in promoting sustainable
changes in service delivery
And practice to improve the
quality of social services
SW Practice with Large
Systems
Agency/organization profile
100%
Advanced Standing
Paper on learning
group
100%
M = 4.35
100%
18, 52
M = 3.49
92.7%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Large
Systems
Agency/organizational profile
100%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.54
100%
19, 20, 22
M = 3.88
98.1%
Benchmark met
2.1.9 Contexts that Shape
Practice
2.1.10 Engage, Assess,
Intervene & Evaluate
2.1.10(a) Engagement
●
Substantively And
effectively prepare for Action
with individuals, families,
groups, organizations, And
communities
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
5
●
Use empathy And
other interpersonal skills
●
Develop a mutually
Agreed-on focus of work And
desired outcomes
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Therapeutic intervention plan
99%
SW Practice with Large
System
Grant writing
100%s
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.9
100%
21
M = 4.21
100%
Benchmark met
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.74
100%
23, 24
M = 3.72
93.6%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Therapeutic intervention plan
99%
SW Practice with Large
Systems
Community profile
100%
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Therapeutic intervention plan
99%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
M = 4.54
100%
25
M = 3.53
92.2%
Benchmark met
M = 4.77
100%
26
M = 3.63
93.2%
Benchmark met
M = 4.64
100%
27
M = 3.58
91.6%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Large
Systems
Grant application
100%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
M = 4.54
100%
28
M = 3.49
92.4%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Large
Systems
Agency/organization profile
100%
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Methods paper
99%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
M = 4.46
100%
30, 33
M = 3.45
88.8%
Benchmark met
M = 4.48
96.8%
29, 91
M = 3.68
93.4%
Benchmark met
2.1.10(b) Assessment
●
Collect, organize,
And interpret client data
●
Assess client
strengths and limitations
●
Develop mutually
agreed-on intervention goals
And objectives
●
Select appropriate
intervention strategies
2.1.10(c) Intervention
●
Initiate actions to
achieve organizational goals
●
Implement
prevention interventions that
enhance clients capacities
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
6
●
Help clients resolve
problems
●
Negotiate, meditate,
and advocate for clients
●
Facilitate transitions
and endings
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Methods paper
99%
Social Welfare Policy I
Legislative action assignment
99%
M = 4.58
100%
35
M = 3.5
90.9%
Benchmark met
M = 4.61
100%
31, 34, 56
M = 3.45
88.6%
Benchmark met
SW Practice with Small
Systems
Methods paper
99%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
Advanced Standing
Psychopathology
overview
89%
M = 4.5
100%
32
M = 3.85
96.1%
Benchmark met
Fundamentals of Research II
Empirical article critique
100%
Advanced Standing
Final proposal
94%
M = 4.54
100%
36, 37, 38, 39, 57, 58, 92
M = 3.11
79.1%
Benchmark met
2.1.10(d) Evaluation
●
Social workers
critically analyze, monitor,
and evaluate interventions
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
7
Table 2: Competencies and Practice Behaviors Distributed in the Social Work Full-Time MSW Micro Concentration
Curriculum
2.1.1 Identify as a
professional social worker
and conduct oneself
accordingly
●
Demonstrate the
professional use of self and
critical consciousness in
multiple micro practice
context
●
Seek supervision
and consultation
appropriately and stay abreast
of changes in social work
practice through life-long
learning
●
Communicate the
purpose of social work
practice with other
professionals, clients and the
community.
2.1.2 Apply Social Work
Ethical Principles to guide
professional practice
●
Apply the NASW
Code of Ethics when making
ethical decisions and
resolving ethical dilemmas
Course Assignment
Course Assignment
80% earn a B or better on
the assignment
Alumni Survey
80% at 3 or
above on a 5point scale (Mean
at 3 or above and
% reported)
Supervisor
Survey
80% at 3 or above
on a 5-point scale
(Mean at 3 or
above and %
reported)
Field Evaluation
80% at 3 or above on 5point scale (Mean at 3
or above and %
reported)
Assessment Results
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
99%
M = 4.52
100%
M = 4.6
100%
1, 32
M = 4.7
98.8%
Benchmark met
M = 4.5
100%
M = 4.6
100%
3, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
M = 4.24
97.8%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
99%
M = 4.52
100%
M = 4.4
100%
2, 34
M = 4.11
98.8%
Benchmark met
Psychopathology
Final paper
74%
M = 4.58
100%
M = 4.8
100%
40
M = 4.17
97.1%
Benchmark met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
8
●
Demonstrate and
apply a professional
understanding of personal and
societal values in ethical
decision-making with
individuals, families and
groups.
●
2.1.3 Apply critical
thinking to inform
communicate professional
judgements
●
Demonstrate an
understanding of and an
ability to critically analyze a
variety of theories and
practice approaches in
bringing about therapeutic
change in individuals,
families and small groups
●
Communicate
orally and in writing when
working with client systems
and complete documentation
effectively;
●
Draw upon a
variety of sources to obtain
knowledge and skills based
upon scientific inquiry.
Dynamics of Race and
Discrimination
Cultural awareness
95%
M = 4.67
100%
M = 4.6
100%
4, 41
M = 4.09
97%
Benchmark met
Psychopathology
Final paper
74%
M = 4.29
97.1%
M = 4.2
100%
5, 42, 45
M = 4.01
97.1%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.58
100%
M = 4.4
100%
7, 43
M = 4.16
96%
Benchmark met
Program Evaluation
Literature review
95%
M = 4.47
100%
M = 4.4
100%
6, 44, 46
M = 4.24
97.7%
Benchmark met
2.1.4 Engage diversity and
difference in practice
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
9
Utilize knowledge and skills
to address social structure and
cultural values that may
oppress, marginalize, and
alienate some, while creating
privilege and power for
others;
●
Demonstrate an
understanding and valuing of
one’s own culture that
influences personal biases and
values that may create
prejudices in working with
diverse groups;
•Integrate effectively into
practice knowledge and skills
of differences and
similarities, as well as
dimensions of diversity.
2.1.5 Advance human rights
and social economic justice
Dynamics of Race and
Discrimination
Cultural awareness paper
95%
M = 4.38
100%
M = 4.4
100%
9
M = 4.17
92.6%
Benchmark met
Dynamics of Race and
Discrimination
Cultural awareness paper
95%
M = 4.61
100%
M = 4.2
80%
39
M = 4.04
97%
Benchmark met
Dynamics of Race and
Discrimination
Final paper
95%
M = 4.55
100%
M = 4.2
80%
8
M = 4.21
100%
Benchmark met
●
Demonstrate
abilities to promote strengths
and competence in
individuals, families and
small groups;
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
95%
M = 4.64
100%
M = 4.8
100%
23
M = 4.26
100%
Benchmark met
•Empower clients to
overcome oppression and
appreciate social and
economic justice by
developing client awareness
of theories of justice and
strategies to promote human
and civil rights;
Dynamics of Race and
Discrimination
Final paper
95%
M = 4.5
100%
M = 4.4
100%
11
M = 3.66
91.2%
Benchmark met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
10
●
Advocate for social
and economic justice on
behalf of clients and to create
social change.
Program Evaluation
Final paper
95%
M = 4.32
100%
M = 4.0
100%
10
M = 3.57
91.4%
Benchmark met
Program Evaluation
Literature review
95%
M = 4.26
97.1%
M = 3.8
100%
29
M = 4.16
98.5%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Family therapy paper
99%
M = 4.02
97%
M = 3.4
80%
12
M = 3.77
97.3%
Benchmark met
Psychopathology
Weekly practice
applications
85%
M = 4.24
96.9%
M = 4.0
100%
13
M = 3.31
84.9%
Benchmark met
Psychopathology
Weekly practice
applications
85%
M = 4.57
100%
M = 4.6
100%
47
M = 4.08
96.7%
Benchmark met
2.1.6 Engage in researchinformed practice and
practice-informed research
●
Review practice
research and select models
appropriate to various client
populations;
●
Apply research
methods and skills in the
critical examination and
evaluation of their own
practice;
●
Document practice
experiences to provide data
that reflects and builds upon
evidence-based intervention.
2.1.7 Apply knowledge of
human behavior and the
social environment
•Apply a biopsychosocial
conceptual framework, to
understand human conditions
that affect client behavior;
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
11
●
Review, select and
apply developmentally and
culturally competent
assessment, intervention and
evaluation models;
●
Integrate
knowledge of individual and
family life span development
in the context of the
environment to understand
the client’s human condition.
2.1.8 Engage in policy
practice to advance social
and economic well-being
and to deliver effective
social work services
●
Stay current with
political, economic, social,
and environmental trends that
create policies that may have
a negative impact on client
systems;
●
Collaborate with
stakeholders who engage in
policy making that affect
program designs, program
funding and service delivery;
●
Choose appropriate
methods for advocating on
behalf of individuals, families
and small groups.
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Family therapy paper
95%
M = 4.39
96.9%
M = 4.4
100%
15, 48
M = 3.88
94.4%
Benchmark met
M = 4.45
96.9%
M = 4.6
100%
14, 49
M = 4.04
96.7%
Benchmark met
Program Evaluation
Final Paper – political and
ethics
95%
M = 4.33
100%
M = 3.8
80%
50
M = 3.93
96.6%
Benchmark met
Program Evaluation
Final paper – implications
95%
M = 4.06
97%
M = 3.8
80%
16, 51
M = 3.08
74.2%
Benchmark met
Dynamics of Race and
Discrimination
Final paper
95%
M = 4.51
100%
M = 4.8
100%
52
M = 3.84
93.3%
Benchmark met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
12
2.1.9 Respond to contexts
that shape Practice
●
Respond effectively
to the existing context that
impact the nature of services
with a continuum of care
model that under gird relevant
services;
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.45
97%
M = 4.4
100%
17, 53
M = 3.83
94.5%
Benchmark met
●
Act as change
agents to provide leadership
and promote stability in
quality service delivery that
address existing human
needs;
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
95%
M = 4.42
100%
M = 4.6
100%
53
M = 3.92
95.7%
Benchmark met
Psychopathology
Mental health in the news
95%
M = 4.48
100%
M = 4.8
100%
18, 55
M = 3.97
93.8%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Professional literature
critique
95%
M = 4.60
100%
M = 4.4
100%
19
M = 4.53
100%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
99%
M = 4.57
100%
M = 4.6
100%
20
M = 4.38
100%
Benchmark met
●
Advocate for health
and mental health, and
promote resiliency factors
that may contribute to the
reduction of risk and
vulnerability.
2.1.10 (a) Engagement
●
Prepare for initial
client contact by integrating
their knowledge, skills and
values with their preliminary
understanding of the client’s
human conditions;
●
Develop an
awareness of ethical
dilemmas that may exist in
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
13
preparation for client
interaction;
●
Identify with the
client’s anxiety inherent in
initial interaction and
purposefully use the
professional self to
demonstrate empathy, respect
for worth and dignity of the
client to facilitate the client’s
sharing his/her human
condition.
2.1.10(b) Assessment
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.57
100%
M = 4.8
100%
21
M = 4.15
98.5%
Benchmark met
●
Communicate
effectively with all client
systems to obtain and analyze
in-depth data to provide
answers to issues, problems,
needs, resources, client
strengths and assets and
collaboratively involve the
client system in determining
intervention strategies and
goals;
●
Conduct a
developmental interview that
enables the client to share
his/her human condition and
participate in determining the
effectiveness of their support
network that can be utilized to
implement the planned
change process;
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
99%
M = 4.42
100%
M = 4.8
100%
22
M = 4.14
100%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.42
97%
M = 4.4
100%
23
M = 4.26
100%
Benchmark met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
14
●
Determine
collaboratively a course of
action which identifies those
achievements and/or barriers
to successful outcomes.
2.1.10 (c) Intervention
Psychopathology
Weekly practice application
85%
M = 4.48
97%
M = 4.8
100%
24
M = 4.09
99%
Benchmark met
●
Enlist the client in
the development of
appropriate and mutually
agreed-on intervention plan;
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.51
97%
M = 4.8
100%
25, 56
M = 4.08
98.8%
Benchmark met
●
Implement
collaborative intervention
strategies that enhance client
social functioning utilizing
referral sources when
indicated;
●
Utilize the client’s
human condition to facilitate
change through negotiation,
mediation and advocacy;
Psychopathology
Final paper
74%
M = 4.48
97%
M = 4.6
100%
26, 57
M = 4.24
96.5%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.57
100%
M = 4.2
100%
27, 58
M = 4.21
96.5%
Benchmark met
●
Seek supervision,
consultation and literature
review to enhance the client’s
goal achievement;
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Literature review
95%
M = 4.54
100%
M = 4.4
100%
59
M = 4.21
97.6%
Benchmark met
●
Facilitate the client
in developing and
maintaining adaptive
behaviors that provide
stability within their
environment.
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems I
Therapeutic intervention
project
95%
M = 4.45
97%
M = 4.4
100%
60
M = 4.00
96.7%
Benchmark met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
15
2.1.10(d) Evaluation
●
Monitor and
evaluate interventions in
collaboration with client
systems
●
Utilize research
skills to ensure best practices
of evidence-based
intervention;
●
Facilitate
termination and separation of
the client-worker relationship
by assessing the goal
attainment results, and the
client’s readiness;
Program Evaluation
Final project
95%
M = 4.33
97.1%
M = 4.4
100%
28, 61
M = 3.91
96.2%
Benchmark met
Program Evaluation
Final project
95%
M = 4.21
97%
M = 4.0
100%
29, 62
M = 3.91
94.3%
Benchmark met
Advanced Practice with
Small Systems II
Micro group simulation
95%
M = 4.33
97%
M = 4.4
100%
30, 63
M = 3.67
89.3%
Benchmark met
●
Develop strategies
for feedback on client’s
maintaining adaptive
functioning;
Psychopathology
Weekly practice
applications
85%
M = 4.48
97%
M = 4.4
100%
31, 64
M = 3.76
93.2%
●
Work
collaboratively with
evaluators/researchers to
assess intervention efficacy
and effectiveness.
Program Evaluation
Final project
95%
M = 4.18
93.9%
M = 4.0
100%
65
M = 3.62
86.9%
Benchmark met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
16
Table 3: Competencies and Practice Behaviors Distributed in the Social Work Full-Time MSW Macro Concentration
Curriculum
2.1.1 Identify as a
professional social worker
and conduct oneself
accordingly
●
Facilitate access to
services for client systems
with human service
organizations and
communities
●
Engage staff in
career learning through staff
training and orientation
●
Use staff
supervision and consultation
in staff development
●
Demonstrate selfawareness in analyzing the
effectiveness of service
delivery systems when
working with diverse
populations in the student’s
field placement and
professional practice
Course
Assignment 80%
earn a B or better
on the assignment
Alumni Survey
80% at 3 or above
on 5-point scale
(Mean and % at 3
or above reported)
Supervisor
Survey
80% at 3 or above on 5point scale (Mean and
% at 3 or above
reported)
Field Evaluation
80% at 3 or above on 5-point
scale (Mean and % at 3 or above
reported)
Assessment Results
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Target plan for
services
100%
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
Dynamics of
Racism and
Discrimination
Cultural awareness
95%
M = 3.75
75%
M = 5.0
100%
2, 24
M = 4.23
98.7%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.75
75%
M = 4.0
100%
26, 27, 28, 29
M = 4.32
100%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.5
75%
M = 5.0
100%
3, 23, 25
M = 4.42
100%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.25
75%
M = 5.0
100%
1, 22
M = 4.35
100%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
17
2.1.2 Apply social work
codes of ethics to social
planning, administration,
and supervision with client
involvement and staff
participation in decisionmaking
●
Distinguish how
decisions are made with
considerations of the political
and organizational constraints
and professional ethics and
standards in HSOs
●
Recognize and
manage personal and
professional values in
working with clients in
community planning and
administrative practice
2.1.3 Apply critical thinking
to inform and communicate
professional judgements
●
Demonstrate
effective oral and written
communication in working
with groups, organizations,
and communities and
examining the ways
colleagues and clients are
involved in making decisions
in organizations
●
Apply community
organization and social
planning theories in working
with individuals, families,
groups, organizations,
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
M = 3.25
75%
M = 5.0
100%
4, 30
M = 4.28
98.7%
Benchmark Met
Dynamics of
Racism and
Discrimination
Cultural awareness
95%
M = 3.75
75%
M = 5.0
100%
31
M = 4.29
100%
Benchmark Met
Community
Organization &
Planning
Leadership team
development
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 5.0
100%
7, 33
M = 4.38
100%
Benchmark Met
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Power analysis of
communities
M = 3.0
75%
M = 5.0
100%
5, 6, 32
M = 4.46
97.3%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
18
communities, and other
professionals
2.1.4 Engage diversity and
differences in
administrative practice and
community organization
●
Demonstrate an
understanding of the
importance of gender in
leadership roles and styles in
organization
●
Apply the value of
diversity in society and
promote competence in
understanding the uniqueness
of individuals within the
environment
●
Promote the dignity
and self-worth of staff,
clients, and consumers in
administrative practices, staff
supervision, and community
planning
2.1.5 Advance human rights
and social and economic
justice through client
empowerment and staff
participation in design of
service delivery systems
●
Utilize the power
and politics as they relate to
strategic planning
●
Assess strengths
and weaknesses of the service
delivery systems for clients/
100%
Dynamics of
Racism and
Discrimination
Weekly Quizzes
100%
Dynamics of
Racism and
Discrimination
Final Paper
95%
M = 3.75
75%
M = missing data
%
37
M = 4.07
97.4%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.75
75%
M = 5.0
100%
8
M = 4.3
97.5%
Benchmark Met
Dynamics of
Racism and
Discrimination
Final Paper
95%
M = 3.75
75%
M = 5.0
100%
38
M = 4.89
94.5%
Benchmark Met
Community
Organization &
Planning
Defining
Community
100%
Strategies of
Community
Organization
M = 3.25
75%
M = 4.0
100%
40
M = 4.02
94.5%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.5
75%
M = 5.0
100%
10
M = 4.10
100%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
19
Community
selection
100%
●
Advocate for staff
participation and client
inclusion in designing
programs in HSOs
●
Engage
clients/consumers in
community planning practices
that advance social and
economic justice in grassroots
level innovative programs
2.1.6 Apply studies in
organization and leadership
to administration and staff
supervision
●
Engage in
analyzing intervention
effectiveness of the
organization in which
students are placed and
recommend changes based on
management theories
●
Engage in
analyzing organizational
effectiveness with an
emphasis on organizational
theory
●
Provide a sound
knowledge base of social
planning, especially the
assessment of community
needs, rational decisionmaking, identification of
alternatives, practical
considerations and evaluation
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Community
selection
100%
M = 3.0
75%
M = 4.0
100%
42
M=
%
Benchmark Met
M = 2.75
75%
M = 4.0
100%
9
M = 4.11
100%
Benchmark Met
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
34
M = 5.00
100%
Benchmark Met
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
11
M = 4.10
100%
Benchmark Met
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Strategies Logic
model
100%
M = 3.25
75%
M = 4.0
100%
39
M = 4.27
100%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
20
2.1.7 Recognize how the
human service
organizations are being
influenced by the political
and economic environments
●
Apply
organizational theory in
understanding the ways in
which services are
coordinated and staff is
supervised
●
Critique and apply
policy changes in the
environment as related to the
adaptation of the organization
in providing services to
vulnerable populations
●
Utilize theories in
power and politics in
analyzing inter-organizational
linkages
2.1.8 Engage in policy
practice to advance social
and economic well-being
and to deliver effective
social work services
●
Advocate for
services to advance the
economic and social wellbeing of clients based on
analyses of the service
delivery systems
●
Design an efficient
service delivery system in
order to better serve and to
better reach out to the
potential clients/consumers
SW
Administration
Final paper and
pres.
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
36
M = 4.00
100%
Benchmark Met
Community,
Economic System
and Policy Change
Final paper
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
12
M = 4.05
100%
Benchmark Met
Community,
Economic System
and Policy Change
Final paper
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 3.0
100%
17
M = 4.05
97.2%
Benchmark Met
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Strategies logic
model
100%
Community,
Economic System
and Policy Change
Final paper
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 5.0
100%
13
M = 4.14
97%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.25
75%
M = 4.0
100%
41
M = 4.12
96.9%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
21
●
Engage in the
examination of
clients’/consumers’
difficulties in obtaining the
needed services from HSOs
Community,
Economic System
and Policy Change
Final paper
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 3.0
100%
14
M = 4.12
96.9%
Benchmark Met
Community,
Economic System
and Policy Change
Final paper
100%
M = 3.25
75%
M = 5.0
100%
15, 43, 54
M = 3.93
96.9%
Benchmark Met
Dynamics of
Racism and
Discrimination
Final Paper
95%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 5.0
100%
45, 50
M = 4.06
98.4%
Benchmark Met
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Power analysis of
communities
100%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
18
M = 4.08
97.2%
Benchmark Met
2.1.9 Respond to contexts
that shape practice
●
Continually
discover, appraise, and attend
to changing needs of clients
and emerging societal trends
to provide relevant services
through community
organizing and social
planning
●
Provide leadership
in promoting organizational
adaptation to improve the
quality of social services
2.1.10 Engage, assess,
intervene, and evaluate with
individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and
communities
2.1.10(a) Engage with
individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and
communities
●
Engage in
interventions for change in
organizations and
communities
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
22
●
Facilitate
organizational and
community change
●
Establish a
relationship with
organizations and
communities
●
Negotiate mutually
agreed-on strategies and
desired outcomes
2.1.10(b) Assess with
individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and
communities
●
Conduct needs
assessment of organizations
and communities including
client/consumer strengths and
weaknesses
●
Develop mutually
agreed upon strategies to
achieve goals and objectives
for organization and
community change
2.1.10(c) Intervene with
individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and
communities
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Final presentation
100%
Community
Organization &
Planning
Development of
leadership team
100%
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Final presentation
100%
M = 3.25
75%
M = 4.0
100%
48
M = 4.13
97.2%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.75
75%
M = 5.0
100%
19
M = 3.97
94.4%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.25
75%
M = 5.0
100%
47
M = 4.26
100%
Benchmark Met
Program
Evaluation
Final paper
95%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
49
M = 4.31
100%
Benchmark Met
Program
Evaluation
Final paper
95%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 4.0
100%
46
M = 3.96
97%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
23
●
Apply advanced
knowledge and skills to
achieve organizational and
community goals
●
Utilize advocacy
and change strategies that
empower organizations and
communities
●
Engage
organizations and
communities in integration of
new innovations
2.1.10(d) Evaluate with
individuals, families,
groups, organizations, and
communities
●
Empower
organizations and
communities in the evaluation
of interventions
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Final presentation
100%
Community
Organization &
Planning
Development of
leadership team
100%
Strategies of
Community
Organization
Final presentation
100%
Program
Evaluation
Final paper
95%
M = 3.5
75%
M = 3.0
100%
18, 52
M = 4.15
98.6%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.25
75%
M = 4.0
100%
21, 53
M = 3.72
91.4%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.0
75%
M = 3.0
100%
20, 51
M = 4.03
98.7%
Benchmark Met
M = 3.0
75%
M = 3.0
100%
55
M = 3.90
93.5%
Benchmark Met
●
2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment
24