PowerPoint deck

advertisement

BUILDING

CAPACITY

for Public Participation

International Association of Public Participation

Core Values Webinar

January 13, 2015

Laura McDonald John Poynton

Poll #1: Your professional affiliation?

- research/higher ed.

- K-12 education

- health care

- government

- industry

2

Poll #2: Your geographic location?

- Australasia

- Canada

- USA

- other

3

Can your school community have a reasoned discussion about…

- massive cuts

- school closures

- boundary changes

- police officers in schools

- allowing teachers to carry arms

- raising taxes to increase teacher pay

4

In an environment with?

- conflict-driven media

heavy reliance on “experts”

- polarized ideological interests

history of “decide, announce & defend” tactics

- rising distrust for school administrators

- lack of trained P2 facilitators in schools

5

Wouldn’t public education work better if more citizens…

6

- had personal relationships with administrators

& legislators and routinely contacted them with concerns?

- were so well-informed about school business, they’d be more willing to serve on the board or committees?

effectively engaged other citizens on controversial issues that many citizens might be reluctant to discuss?

- could share accurate information about emerging issues, dispel myths and rumors, help problem-solve?

…and more districts had administrators and parents trained in P2 theory and process facilitation?

7

But engagement trends aren’t good !

- parents leaving PTAs

(Putnam, 2000)

- complexity of education

(Fisher, 2009)

- administrator expertise

(Mathews, 2006)

- strained relationships

(Gillon, 2000)

distrust of “non-experts”

(Sexton, 2004)

- citizens withdrawing

(Harwood, 2005)

- public easily manipulated

(Fishkin, 2008)

8

Meet our parent, Laura

 professional

 active voter

 taxpayer

 has two elementary-aged kids

 loves her neighborhood school but had NO relationship with her school district!

9

Laura ’ s perspective…

scary powerful

vs

people

Laura

10

We needed to change the culture!

11

Organizational change takes time!

- secure the support of a credible leader

- identify root cause of failed interactions

- design and train for details

get early wins (make colleagues ‘the hero’)

- connect citizens with experts, build trust

- empower parents with know-how, know-who

- recruit experienced facilitators when needed

- be a persistent change champion

12

Outside, parents noticed!

13

Engagement began to rise!

14

Poll #3: Generally, how would you characterize your community’s capacity for public participation?

- above average

- average

- below average

- S.O.S.! (crisis mode)

- unsure

15

Poll #4: Generally, how would you characterize your organization’s support for public participation?

- above average

- average

- below average

- not even on the chart

- unsure

16

Hypothesis

Would a citizen training that provides

- organizational knowledge (know-how)

- relationship building (know-who) raise our district ’ s P2 capacity?

17

Know-how

District

- org. structure

- governance

- budget

- schools & curriculum

- student services

- P2/deliberation skills

State/Local

- elected officials

- school finance

- state Board of Ed.

- state & federal laws

- state education policy

- PK-12 legislation

18

Know-who

District

- superintendent

- board president

- leadership team (asst.

superintendents., exec. directors, etc.)

State/Local

- legislators

- state ed. board

- state dept. leads

- local municipal leaders

- law enforcement

19

LSV Training Program - Year 6

What citizen training in district affairs

Why reengage parents, build

P2 capacity

When meets monthly for 2½ hours

Where board of ed.

room

Who parents (mostly) from across the district

Agenda supt’s update, guest speakers, core topics

20

Research domains

- knowledge operations, funding, governance,

P2

- relationship build rapport with decision makers

- willingness prepared to commit time/ resources

- efficacy understands P2 theory & process

- action participates in district activities

21

RQ1: Knowledge

LSV significantly improved my knowledge of …

- policies and practices

- organizational structure

state’s role in funding

- instructional programs

school board’s role strongly agree/agree

97%

93%

89%

85%

80%

22

Participant quote - knowledge

“ When you feel informed, you feel empowered ...

23

RQ2: Relationships

LSV makes me more likely to contact …

- a friend or acquaintance

- friends contact me

- a board member

- the superintendent

- a state legislator strongly agree/agree

82%

81%

81%

77%

67%

24

Participant quote - relationships

“ It was the first time I was exposed to legislators.

25

RQ3: Willingness

LSV makes me more willing to be involved … strongly agree/agree

- in conversations with others

- in PTO, other committees

- seek out school leadership

- in Board of Ed meetings

- in state legislative hearings

96%

74%

74%

63%

56%

26

Participant quote - willingness

“LSV has given me more confidence and to assert myself and advocate for the things I believe in.”

27

RQ4: Efficacy

LSV strengthened my deliberation skills …

- finding solutions

 difficult choices

- finding solutions

 uncomfortable strongly agree/agree

97%

97% conversations

- different perspectives

 better solutions 92

- greater understanding of different perspectives

- different positions, but finding consensus 85%

28

Participant quote - efficacy

“ I’ve definitely learned to consider where people are coming from.

29

RQ5: Action

After LSV I have participated in …

- volunteered at a school/district event

- asked another person to participate

- shared new knowledge with the PTO

- involved in a legislative initiative

- made a financial contribution yes

100%

92%

88%

88%

85%

30

RQ5: Action cont’d

- communicated with superintendent/board

- supported candidate campaign

- used social media to share information

- solicited a financial contribution

- submitted a Letter to the Editor yes

81%

73%

69

%

31

Participant quote - action

“It made me feel more comfortable about getting involved…doing campaigning, educating, talking to parents, getting petitions signed, going to speak at parent groups, emails, all kinds of things that I would say are on a broader level.”

32

RQ-6 Ripple Effect

Evidence from archival records

PTO records

Newspapers

Web-based docs

Legislative hearings

Election coverage

Event agendas

33

Lessons learned

John

- no perfect meeting time

- encourage staff to raise the tough problems

- include a social event

- child care availability big plus

Laura

- never underestimate the power of a few

don’t let perfect be the enemy of good

- modeling, sincerity & encouragement are key

- safety in numbers

34

Insights to consider

- starting small is good

- strong leadership essential

- including staff builds buy-in

- not a means for a specific political win

- more work from staff (but its the right work)

- huge opportunity for communications office

35

Getting citizens back to the table

Leadership St. Vrain

36

Leadership St. Vrain

37

Building culture of public participation

38

Grassroots St. Vrain

39

For more information…

Laura McDonald

Grassroots St. Vrain laura@grassrootsstvrain.org

303-883-6320

John Poynton

St. Vrain Valley Schools poynton_john@svvsd.org

303-682-7404

40

Download