Problems in Canadian Business Law Pol/Soc Sci 3165 6.0A Tuesdays, 2:30-5:30 pm Simon Archer sarcher@torys.com Introduction PCBL Learning objectives Basic familiarity with legal concepts that businesses use and are formed by Hot topics in business law Research ability Critical approaches After course should be able to understand basic vocabulary of business law, identify how to research business law problems. Introduction cont’d Course format Assigned readings Supplementary readings Lecture and guest lecture • Division of 3-hour timeslot Multimedia where possible Self-directed research Introduction cont’d Grading scheme Evaluation format Deadlines Researching and writing research papers • See handout Research Papers Select topic, narrow topic Secondary sources first, primary sources second Typical public policy options and analysis: • Conceptual problems (e.g., definitions), analytical problems (e.g., consistent reasoning), empirical problems (e.g., how measured, how common, etc.) Research papers cont’d Single most important “legal” skill Expectations: Argumentative paper Based on actual research conducted Your very best effort, not a draft Review academic policy on plagiarism USE writing and researching aids and other resources from York Writing tips Prepare by reading other people’s opinions on your subject Use outlines (bullet points) to develop your paper, don’t write from the top of your head. Use plain English: never over-utilize hypertrophic linguistics, it sounds pompous and stupid (and many academics do this to their discredit) See handout. Overview of PCBL Survey course of several areas of law relating to businesses in Canada Each topic requires a course in itself Combine introduction to topic with “special issues” in that topic Not a cumulative or iterative process, choose topics that interest you from entire curriculum Basic contents of course Constitutional distinctions Common law and equity (fall) (private law?) • Law of of obligations • Contract, tort, restitution • Employment contracts, sale of goods • Equity • Trusts and fiduciaries Regulatory schemes (spring) (public law) • • • • • • Business associations Regulation of competition and trade Regulation of international trade Dissolution (bankruptcy and insolvency) Taxation Intellectual property law Contents not covered Property law Transfer of property, real estate Bailment Insurance law Negotiable instruments Environmental law E-business law (cf. contract) YOU CAN choose these for research papers Otto Today’s lecture Some theoretical frameworks Sources of law Vocabulary and distinctions in legal discourse Identify the Willes’ position on certain issues Some characterizations of “the law” Naturalism – law or legal systems have inherent moral or “natural” elements Positivism – law and legal systems are constructed according to social convention Realism – legal principles not strictly related to decisions – emphasis on analogical reasoning Critical legal theory/Critical race theory – emphasis on analytics and distribution of power Law-and-economics, law-and-biology: legal systems and principles as sharing homological root to other disciplines: economics and biology Sources of law for public policy questions Why do people cheat on taxes? Economist: because there is sufficient incentive versus risk Sociologist: because the community condones it Psychologist: because behaviour of risk-takers separates risk from rewards Bay St. lawyer: define “cheating”? Creative interpretation of the Income Tax Act. Further reading for theory The Willes’ Doesn’t take a clear position (but hints of the libertarian, consistent with mainstream business press?) Question: are courts state or non-state institutions? Standard introduction: J.W. Harris, Legal Philosophies, 2nd ed., 1997. Bottom line Be aware many approaches and forms of legal theory Be aware many sources of evidence that “explain” law, legal systems, legal behaviours Try to choose ones that seem appropriate to the problem Some legal sources Three main sources of formal law “Black letter law” – “jurisprudence” Parliament, legislatures, domestic courts Constitutions Statutes Judicial decision-making (case law) Treatises, commentaries (from Blackstone to Peter Hogg) Secondary sources (see handout) Legal pluralism (another theoretical approach) Individuals and groups part of many normative systems “Gap” between formal legal principles and behavioural outcomes Sources cont’d Other sources of institutional authority (non-state?) Professional associations – e.g., law societies – self-regulating by statute Industry associations and codes • Voluntary codes of conduct • Standard-setting bodies Supra-national instruments • NAFTA, World Court The systems Two parallel legal systems Common law system All provinces but Québec Precursor and filiations with English legal system Civil Code system Québec, codification of all laws cf. Roman law and Napoleonic Code Some initial vocabulary Common law system Origins in English legal system from communal decision-making processes in the Middle Ages to modern court system Judge-made law, case-by-case Origins in “writs” that could be brought naming party, cause, and “prayer for relief” • e.g., quantum meruit, a writ for services rendered but not paid for, a part of the development of contract law called quasi-contract, now called restitution, required specific wording and formula Vocabulary cont’d Common law Features doctrine of stare decisis • judicial decisions as main source, all courts bound by prior decision on same facts • SCC not bound In reality many outside influences on development of doctrine Vocabulary cont’d Equity Initially introduced to “correct” or “supplement” perceived failures of the common law Employs doctrine and maxims, “equity follows the law” Equitable relief at Court of Chancery Fusion of the courts in Canada – 1871 Substantive areas Lex mercatoria (law merchant) First transnational business law? • Cf. relationship to arbitration, specialty courts Current incarnation: globalization of the law of business transactions (law of New York law firms) Why no lex laboria? Factoid: maybe 10 cases in Canada employ the word “globalization”. Why? Vocabulary cont’d Statute law (public law, regulatory or administrative state) Bill – Motion/Readings Royal Assent Proclamation Regulations Powers given under statute that avoid the legislative process when figuring out how to apply a law. Vocabulary cont’d Judicial review of state in/action Claimed priority by “inherent jurisdiction” Developed out of five perogative writs • Mandamus, prohibition, certiori, procendendo, quo warranto, habeus corpus Feature of administrative law (law of regulatory state) Highly contested/politicized area: brings up basic questions of jurisdiction and authority in democratic theory Public vs. Private Willes: private is individual (plaintiff vs. defendant), public is individual versus state What is use of this distinction? Substantive vs. procedural An heuristic distinction Usually made to distinguish the right or obligation from the way it is enforced E.g., right to have a promise kept, but enforced through rules of civil procedure Is there such thing as a right without a remedy? Is it “law”? Above the law? Some questions The question of certainty Litigation was a response to trial by ordeal. What’s different? Do judges follow stare decisis? Are court proceedings relatively certain ways of deciding disputes? Do legal rules or principles have robust connection to individual or group behaviour? Are, therefore, courts efficient from a business perspective? Addendum: case law Elements of most reported cases/how to read a case: Recitation of material facts Applicable law (statutes or precedent cases) List of issues to be decided Analysis of issues as law is applied to facts (ratio decendi) Ruling or outcome In fact, the paper involved in a typical criminal case is at least a banker’s box of documents, so reported cases are stylized reports No case law reading requirements – a waste of time Next class Setting up the system Current constitutional arrangements The set up: court system in general Can we talk about process? Procedure in general Administrative law and regulatory state More Simpsons?