Would we eat without hunger? Feelings of hunger are not always a product of our body’s need for nutrition. Rats who have had their stomachs cut out, thereby eliminating hunger pangs, still eat. Humans are the same. Filling our stomachs on low-calorie food leads to hunger faster than not completely filling our stomachs on high-calorie food. Why we eat The hypothalamus plays a role in both eating and feeling full. Animals and humans automatically regulate their caloric intake to maintain a stable weight. When glucose (blood sugar) drops, we feel hungry. When stressed, we crave carbs because they help boost serotonin in the brain. Experimental starvation (Keys et al, 1950) Subjects volunteered to go on a “starvation diet” (reduce body weight to 75% of previous levels) under supervision. In the starvation phase, personality changed: became apathetic, irritable, aggressive, uninterested in sex, and obsessed with food. In the “refeeding” phase, they were still obsessed with food, and negative outlook continued. Many never got their optimism and cheerfulness back. Experimental overeating (Sims) Prisoners volunteered to put on 20-30 lbs. After initially gaining weight easily, they had trouble gaining. Food became repulsive, and they quickly lost weight again when they started eating normally. Normal-weight people have trouble increasing their weight substantially, and the added weight is hard to maintain. Set-point theory States that our body has a ‘weight thermostat” to keep our weight stable. Heredity influences both our body type and our set point. If you start losing too much weight, your metabolism slows down to try to conserve calories. If you start gaining too much, your metabolism speeds up to try to burn off calories. Set point also adjusts our metabolic rate—resting rate of energy expenditure. Problems with set-point theory Why does set point vary from person to person? Why are some people’s set points set at “obese?” Researchers say there are too many factors involved in hunger and eating; it’s not as simple as a set-point. Positive incentive model An alternative to set-point theory States that people are motivated by personal pleasure (the taste of food), social context (eating out with others), and biological factors (how hungry are you?) Having a variety of food promotes overeating; supermarket diet for rats increases weight by 269%. Set-point theory ignores the factors of taste, learning, and social context in eating. Obesity—General findings Overeating is not the sole cause of obesity, but it is a large factor. Overweight people tend to eat more than normalweight people do, especially foods high in fat and calories. Overweight people tend to be less physically active than normal-weight people. Metabolic levels change both with food intake and energy output. Metabolism is probably slower in overweight people. Binge eating is a risk factor for obesity. Internal-external hypothesis Schachter (1968) People often fail to listen to their own internal cues for eating and pay attention to the external cues (food taste, smell, & variety). Some people are more sensitive to external cues (appealing foods). These people are called externals. Study by Rodin & Slochower with girls at camp—externals gained more weight because they munched on candy after a full meal Normal weight vs. obese: findings Normal weight people pay more attention to internal rather than external cues. Obese people are more likely to eat something that looks or smells good even when they’re not hungry. One study found that obese people eat 7times more than normal weight people do during exam time, though they ate the same amounts at other times. Restraint theory When people are trying to lose weight, they deliberately ignore their internal hunger cues and try to use cognitive rules to limit their eating. Could backfire because denying yourself food may lead you to binge. Treating obesity Losing weight boils down to two things: eat less and exercise more. In 2001, 70% of high school girls and more than 30% of boys were dieting. Several approaches to weight loss: restrict portion size, restrict types of food you eat, increase exercise, rely on drastic medical procedures, or use a combination of the above. Restricting types of food Reducing portion size is reasonable and healthy, but people find it difficult to do. High-protein, low carb diets can produce rapid weight loss, but people find it very difficult to stay on these diets. May be unhealthy as well (high cholesterol). These diets produce fatigue and depression after only a few days. High-carb, low fat diets can be safe and effective. Limiting yourself to a liquid diet or single food group is very unwise. They’re nutritional disasters. How to succeed when restricting food groups Most experts agree that eating a diet high in fiber from fruits and vegetables is a good strategy. Instead of going on a “diet,” experts advise a total lifestyle change. Learn to eat healthier, and incorporate exercise into your routine permanently. Behavior modification programs—gradual weight loss & maintenance of that loss are emphasized. Helps you change your thoughts about food and your eating behavior. Behaviors, not consequences, are rewarded. Characteristics of successful weight loss Most successful dieters lost weight on their own without going through a formal weight loss program. Obese children who lose weight are more likely to maintain the weight loss than adults are. If you’re not overweight, then dieting to lose a few pounds is not a good strategy. Better to just try to eat healthy foods. It’s healthy to gain up to 7 pounds per decade as you age. Exercise Exercise is not effective for spot reduction (e.g., toning thighs). You must have aerobic exercise for this. Exercise is at least equal to dieting in controlling weight & much better than dieting in changing the ratio of fat to muscle tissue. Wood et al. (1988): Exercisers vs. dieters vs. controls—runners lost only fat tissue & retained more lean muscle tissue. More about exercise Exercise produces weight loss through changes in metabolic rate, rather than through burning calories. Cutting down by 500 calories a day produces a pound of weight loss every week (because 3500 calories = 1 lb of body fat). Moderate physical activity is sufficient to control weight. 30 minutes of moderate physical activity every day is needed, and only 25% of Americans get that. Exercise dropouts For cardiovascular health, you need to walk briskly 3 hours a week (or 6 miles/week) to reduce your risk of heart attack by 30-40%. Those most likely to exercise are males, younger people, having a past history of physical activity, and attaining higher levels of education/income. Women cite self-consciousness as a barrier to exercise. People who are smokers, in poor health, and very stressed are less likely to begin an exercise program and more likely to quit one. Anorexia nervosa: Diagnostic criteria Defined by the DSMIV-R as intentional weight loss to a point where you lose 15% of normal weight, or have a BMI of 17.5 or less. Also included are a fear of being fat, preoccupation with food or dieting, a distorted body image, and cessation of menstrual periods for 3 cycles or more. Two subgroups: 1) restricting type and 2) bingepurging type (which is different from bulimia) Demographics of anorexics Usually young, white women who are outwardly compliant and high achievers in school Preoccupied with food, like to cook for others, insist that others eat their food, but eat almost nothing themselves. Tend to be ambitious, perfectionistic, unhappy with their bodies, and come from high-achieving, overprotective families. When weight loss exceeds 25% People start acting like Keys’ starving subjects. They “lose their personalities” to the disease. Person constantly feels chilled, grows a soft downy covering of body hair, loses scalp hair, loses interest in sex, and develops an unusually preoccupation with food. Hostility toward others then develops as starvation level becomes deadly. What motivates anorexics to starve themselves? Experts view the disease as an attempt by girls to gain control. Anorexics are typically troubled girls who feel incapable of changing their lives. They see their parents as overdemanding and in absolute control of their lives, but they are too compliant to rebel openly. They enjoy being hungry and see food as the enemy. Cognitive-behavioral therapy An increasingly popular treatment option for people with anorexia Goal is to change the cognitive distortions that accompany body image problems and eating behavior. Therapists attack these distortions while maintaining a warm and accepting attitude toward patients. Patients are taught to discard absolutist, “all-ornothing” attitudes about food. Other approaches Another, fairly new approach, comes out of Maudsley Hospital in London. Involves getting parents involved as part of the solution instead of part of the problem. Parents are given absolute control over their child’s eating—basically allowed to force-feed the patient. Success is limited to adolescents. Prozac is helpful for preventing relapse. Diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa Recurrent episodes of binge eating, a sense of lack of control over eating, and inappropriate, drastic measures to compensate for binging. Some bulimics fast or exercise excessively, but most use self-induced vomiting or laxatives to maintain weight. Contrary to anorexics, bulimics want to maintain a relatively normal weight (some are slightly overweight) instead of lose weight. It’s easier to hide bulimia because weight remains fairly normal. Characteristics of bulimia Bulimia patients eat in spurts. Most are women in their late teens or twenties. They’re typically older than anorexic patients. Preoccupied with food, fearful of becoming overweight, and are depressed and anxious. Feel depressed and ashamed after binges. Bulimics often have other psychological problems, such as impulsivity, drug or alcohol abuse, sexual promiscuity, suicide attempts, or shoplifting/stealing. More characteristics of bulimics Childhood experiences with sexual abuse, physical abuse, and posttraumatic stress are correlates of bulimia. About ¼ of sex abuse victims turn out to be bulimic later. Bulimics show poor coping skills and find it difficult to deal with stressful events. Prognosis for bulimics Bulimics have an advantage over anorexics in that they understand their own behavior is wrong and harmful. Anorexics see nothing wrong with their eating patterns. Cognitive behavior therapy is very effective for bulimia and results in 80% reduction in binging. Antidepressants are not as effective as therapy in the treatment of bulimia. Males with eating disorders It’s very unusual for a male to develop an eating disorder, but it does happen. Whereas women who develop the disorders feel fat, men who develop the disorders usually are overweight. Men are often more concerned with muscle definition and may diet for athletic reasons. 21% of men who develop eating disorders are gay and diet to please a lover. The media’s role in eating disorders Supermodels are thinner now than ever before. Reinforcement of dieting or slimness appears in only 10% as many male-directed articles and ads as in women’s. When women are on magazine covers, it’s usually a body shot. Men usually get just a face shot. Study with 500 University of Pennsylvania students Women’s ideal body weight was less than their current weight. Women believed men preferred them to weigh less than what the men actually preferred. Men judged their own weight to be identical to what their ideal weight should be and what women wanted them to weigh.