Basic charts from the UC Budget 2009-10 Comment

advertisement

Akos Rona-Tas, UC San Diego

Washington Monthly’s ranking

UCB, UCSD, and UCLA are top in, based mainly on Social Mobility (recruiting and graduating

low-income students), and Research (cutting-edge PhDs).

U.S. News and World Report ‘s ranking of public schools

 UCB 1 st , UCLA 2 nd , UCSD 7 th , and 3 more in top 20

The Academic Ranking of World Universities by Shanghai Jiao Tong University

 Four UC campuses in the top 20 in the world (UCSD ranked 14 th )

Excellence in research

11 Nobel Prizes in the last 10 years

 2009 Elizabeth Blackburn, UCSF, biology, Oliver Williamson, UCB, economics

 2008 Roger Y. Tsien, UCSD, chemistry

 2004 Irwin Rose, UCI, chemistry, Finn Kydland, UCSB, economics, David Gross, UCSB, physics

 2003 Clive Granger, UCSD, economics,

 2001 George Akerlof, UCB, economics,

 2000 Herbert Kroemer, UCSB, physics, Alan Heeger, UCSB, chemistry, Daniel McFadden, UCB, economics

Currently

 33 Nobel prize winners, the highest at any university (8 @ UCSD) ,

5 Field Medalist (1 @UCSD),

13 National Medal of Science laureates (3 @UCSD),

25 McArthur fellows (8 @UCSD)

UC library system has 34 million items and is one of the largest collections in the world

UC researchers create 3 new patents a day

Numbers are on UC’s side:

1. California is 48 th in the proportion of high school graduates going to 4-year college

2. Number of high school graduates remains high and stable

Annual general operating budget of UC is $19 billion

-- a little less than the entire economy of countries like Panama, El Salvador or Jordan

-- a little more than the entire economy of Bolivia, or Paraguay or Iceland

The “Core Funds” that pay for the core mission of UC: instruction, research and public service is $5.6 billion

Originally, in 2008-2009, $3.2 billion of that was expected to come from the State of California

UC has 220,000 students

Princeton 7,334, Stanford 15,000, University of Michigan 41,000, University of Illinois 41,500

CSU has 433,000 and CCC 1,628,000

( http://www.cpec.ca.gov/SecondPages/DetailedData.asp

)

UC has 170,000 faculty and staff

 size of Walgreen and Pepsi Co., it would be in the top 25 biggest US companies

UC has been defunded since 2001

Slow, gradual cuts 2001-2008

Dramatic, giant cuts 2009-2010

The Funding of UC

UC Core Funds

The University’s “core funds,” comprised of State General Funds , UC General

Funds , and student fee revenue , provide permanent support for the core mission activities of the University: instruction, research, and public service, as well as the administrative and support services needed to carry out these activities. Totaling $5.6 billion in 2008-09, these funds represent 28% of the

University’s total budget.

Comment: The UC charts do not reflect the big cut in 2009

Source: http://budget.ucop.edu/rbudget/200910/2009-

10BudgetforCurrentOperations-BudgetDetail.pdf

UC General Funds

In addition to State General Fund support, certain other fund sources are unrestricted and provide general support for the University’s core mission activities. Collectively referred to as UC General Funds, these include:

- a portion of overhead on federal and state contracts and grants;

- DOE laboratory operations overhead and management;

- nonresident tuition;

- fees for application for admission and other fees;

- a portion of patent royalty income; and

- interest on General Fund balances.

Based on recent trends and nonresident enrollment projections and tuition levels, the University expects to generate $594 million in UC General Funds during 2008-09. The largest sources of UC General Funds are nonresident tuition, accounting for $257 million, and indirect cost recovery on federal contracts and grants, totaling $252 million in 2008-09.

HEPI=Higher Education Price Index

Comment: In the chart to the left student fees are net of financial aid.

Student Fees

Comment: Aid includes loans and gift aid.

Return-to-Aid

Access

the total cost of attendance: resident student fees, living and personal expenses, costs related to books and supplies, transportation, health care

Student-Faculty Ratio

Since 1994, the University has maintained a budgeted student-faculty ratio of 18.6:1 . Before the cuts of the early 1990s, the University’s student-faculty ratio was 17.6:1 ; the deterioration in the ratio represented about 500 faculty members.

Faculty Pay and Pension

Eight percent pay cut

Hiring freeze

Slow loss of top faculty

Cut in staff

Comment: This does not reflect the 2009 cut the green line shows what should have happened but did not.

Comment: This chart was compiled around October 2008 and it does not reflect recent losses.

Administration

(Institutional Support)

Comment: The text indicates elsewhere that the budget of UCOP is around 280 million

(p.107). Of that 57 million is being cut but 26 million of the cut is redirected to the campuses.

Institutional Support

Services provide the administrative infrastructure for the University’s operations. Grouped into five broad categories, institutional support activities include:

Executive Management — offices of the President, Vice Presidents, Chancellors, and Vice Chancellors; planning and budget offices;

Fiscal Operations — accounting, audit, and contract and grant administration;

General Administrative Services — computer centers, information systems, and personnel;

Logistical Services — purchasing, mail distribution, and police;

Community Relations — development and publications.

Comment: Institutional Support does not include academic support or operation and maintenance of plant.

Note: UC and CSU excluding Community Colleges

Source: http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/pdf/Enacted/BudgetSummary/FullBudgetSummary.pdf

Notes: IHSS (In Home Supportive Services) -- in home care,

DDS (Department of Developmental Services) – disability care,

Medi-Cal -- healthcare for the poor

Higher education has been underfunded to compensate for increased funding needs in two main areas:

Healthcare

 Rising healthcare costs, large uninsured population

Prisons

In 2009: 173,000 inmates

 1977 [before the War on Drugs] 20,000 inmates,

 in 1994 [before the Three Strikes law] 125,000 inmates

31,000 correctional officers – highly organized lobby

$46,000/year is spent on one inmate

 Compare: $9,560/year spent on one UC student

Average gross pay of a correction officer is $72,000

 This is the pay of an Associate Professor at UC

At the end of 2008-09 the state cut

$814.1 million , but gave back $716 million from the stimulus package.

After adjusting for cost increases on the expense and fee increases on the revenue side, the total cut to the core funds was $240.7 million.

This year, there will be another

$637.1 million cut.

After adjusting for everything, including fee increases ( $452.9 million ), in two years,

$776 million was taken from the core funds.

This is $3,500 per student on top of the tuition increase.

Efficiency arguments

State subsidies make universities less competitive

Lower quality

 more private universities in the top ranks

 countries with larger sector in higher education have more top ranked universities

More waste

 universities spend on unnecessary things – administration, nice dorms etc.

More useless subjects

 No pressure to produce useful skills

Less motivation

 Free tuition make students appreciate education less

Fairness arguments

The main beneficiary is the student

 the student should pay

State subsidies are unfair taxation

 Everyone pays taxes, mostly the middle and upper middle class go to college: take from the poor and give to the rich

Freedom arguments

Students are more free

 can choose from more options

Professors are more free

 state cannot interfere with teaching

Two ways to balance our budget

Raising revenue

Raise tuition

-- to $23,000 to replace the state’s entire contribution up to 2008 levels

-- to $28,000 to do the same up to 2001 levels (the last “good year”)

Differentiate tuition

Increase number of out-of-state students

Increase other revenues

Summer utilization of campuses

EAP

Foreign campuses

Private donors

Corporate sponsorship

Cutting costs

Larger classes

More non-ladder rank faculty

Distance learning

Efficiency Argument

Inefficient market: the market does not necessarily know best

 universities should not be limited to teaching knowledge that seems practical and in high demand at the moment – we need both Einstein and accounting

 Must not just focus on short term demand that changes rapidly

 Must provide basic skills useful in the long term – including critical thinking

 different instructional cost of different disciplines the quality of university instruction is hard to gauge – race to the bottom

 Compete amenities? Entertaining classes? Sports team? Parties? Why not sell grades?

Fairness Argument

Public benefits – students should not bear the main burden

 more students with college degrees:

less unemployment, crime, healthcare expense,

more inventions, better technology, less expensive work force, higher economic growth, higher real estate value,

 also more civic volunteering, political participation, better public schools

Access – should depend only on merit

 the poor and the historically underrepresented will lose access

Freedom argument

Students’ choices will be limited to schools they can afford

Profs will have less freedom -- corporations will call the shots

Proposals to increase state revenue:

Tax on oil drilling -- $1-2 billion

Raising the vehicle license fee -- $0.5 billion

Tax on tobacco -- $1 billion

Restoring tax breaks given to large corporations in February

2009 – $2.5 billion

Restoring budget priorities

Pass healthcare reform!

Criminal justice reform

Abolishing the 2/3 majority rule established by Prop

13 in 1978 – by a new proposition

 To put a proposition on the ballot: 8% (for a constitutional amendment) or 5% (for a statute) of the number of people who voted in the most recent election for governor must sign a petition.

Federalization of some campuses (Birgeneau-Yeary plan)

UCSD http://savingucsd.ning.com/

 http://blink.ucsd.edu/sponsor/budgetline/index.html

UCLA http://savingucla.ning.com/

UCOP http://www.ucop.edu/

Professor Christopher Newfield’s blog http://utotherescue.blogspot.com/

Professor Charles Schwartz’s site http://universityprobe.org/

Download