The Judicial Branch Law and Order: Government Interpreting the laws Inscribed at the top of the Supreme Court building are the words, “Equal justice under law.” These words epitomize the role of the judicial branch. What do they mean to you? What ideal should the courts strive for? Review Supreme Court: the highest court in the land— decisions apply to lower courts Judicial Review: Most important Supreme Court duty Decide if a law is __________ or not Judicial Branch is Article _____ of the Constitution Meet the Supreme Court 9 judges total, appointed by president for life (with good behavior) 8 plus one Chief Justice Must be confirmed by the Senate (Judiciary committee) Can be impeached by Congress Would your nominees be confirmed? How many of you have ever asked one parent or family member to do something and were denied and then asked someone else the same thing in the hopes of getting a different decision? Did it work? Give an example. How do you think this relates to the American judicial system? Types of law: Civil law: Deals with the rights of private citizens Criminal law: Deals with crimes and their punishments Constitutional law: Meaning of the Constitution The court system Dual court system: Both state and federal courts State: State crime, family, wills, traffic Federal: Multiple states, ambassadors, federal crimes, interstate commerce State courts State Trial Court (criminal, family, juvenile, traffic): Original jurisdiction (first to hear a case) State appellate Court: If dissatisfied with the ruling, can appeal to this level Appellate jurisdiction (reviewing a prior decision in a case for mistakes) State Supreme Court The federal court system U.S. district courts (94 total): Trial courts Original jurisdiction U.S. circuit courts of appeal (13) Appellate jurisdiction Supreme Court: Appellate jurisdiction Usually does not have original jurisdiction except in cases involving ambassadors or multiple states (Art. III of Constitution) How do cases get to the Original Jurisdiction ~ 80 Decisions ~80% of cases accepted come from federal system <1% of cases accepted are original jurisdiction U.S. Supreme Court? U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: 12 circuits + Federal Circuit State Supreme Court – highest state court Intermediate Appeals Court U.S. District Court – 94 districts Federal Trials FEDERAL: 1 million cases/yr Streetlaw.com Trial Courts – municipal or county Local Trials STATES: 30 million cases/yr How does a case get to the Supreme Court? Hears cases by writ a certiorari (cert) “To be made more certain” Each year, accepts about 100 cases out of 10,000 petitioned “Rule of Four”: 4 of 9 justices must agree to hear case The Supreme Court will hear cases if… Lower courts are in conflict with each other The government may have violated someone’s rights The case concerns all Americans The Court needs to establish guidelines on a controversial issue You on the case: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Research As you take notes, think about how your specific case illustrates how cases get to the Supreme Court. Regent of the U. of California v. Bakke: Tinker v. Des Moines: Brown v. Board of Education: New Jersey v. T.L.O: Mapp v. Ohio: Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier: Gideon v. Wainwright: Texas v. Johnson: Miranda v. Arizona: Citizens United v. the F.E.C.: Tinker v. Des Moines: Roe v. Wade: The Bill of Rights and Landmark Supreme Court Cases First Amendment (Speech): Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), Texas v. Johnson (1989), Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission (2010) First Amendment (Religion): Lynch v. Donnelly (1984) Fourth Amendment: Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Fifth Amendment: Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Sixth Amendment: Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Ninth Amendment: Roe v. Wade (1973) Fourteenth Amendment: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) The power of judicial review Decides if laws are constitutional (permitted by the Constitution) or not Had less power than the other branches until Marbury v. Madison Creates precedents for future courts to follow Precedents: Judging based on prior decisions Marbury v. Madison Madison did not deliver federal judge job to Marbury Marbury sued Madison; asked S.C. for writ of mandamus (court order to force him) Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed S.C. to do this Chief Justice Marshall’s ruling: S.C. did not have original jurisdiction to hear case/Constitution did not allow writs of mandamus Therefore, Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional Warm Up What category or categories does your case fall under for cert (from “Will They Hear the Case”)? Write important info. on the board Name and date of case Issue and any important vocab. words DO NOT REVEAL THE SIGNIFICANCE YET! How the Supreme Court decides Briefs: Written statements from both sides Oral argument: Both sides present case, in 30 minutes Conference and majority vote Opinion Writing: Explains decision Majority opinion: The ruling Concurring opinions: Voted with the majority, but for different reasons Dissenting opinions: Voted against the decision Landmark Cases Which of the landmark cases was most “landmark,” in your opinion? Why? What is a common theme or similarity you have noticed about these cases so far? Warm Up If you were a Supreme Court justice and you had to decide on a case, what would you base your decision on? Option A: Only what is in the exact text of the Constitution Option B: The Constitution plus your opinion on what would be best for today’s society Explain why. How do justices decide? Ways of interpreting the Constitution: Judicial Restraint: Strict interpretation of the Constitution (originalists) Based only on what is in the text Judicial Activism/“Living Constitution”: Loose interpretation of the Constitution Goes beyond the text to look at broader social consequences Review! Define: Petitioner and respondent Majority opinion Concurring opinion Dissenting opinion Watch the Stephen Colbert interview with retired justice John Paul Stevens. Court cases mentioned: Bush v. Gore, Citizens United List terms/concepts/ideas from the interview you recognize learning in class. Our Supreme Court Sotomayor: Thomas: Roberts: Alito: Kagan: Ginsburg: Breyer: Kennedy: Scalia: Attorneys and Reporters Petitioner: Respondent: Reporters: Moot Court Roles Supreme Court (9): Attorneys for the petitioner (2) and attorneys for the respondent (2): Job: Create questions, rule on the case Assignment: Write your opinion on the case (majority, concurring, dissenting) Job: Create arguments and try to persuade the court to rule in favor of your client Assignment: Write a “brief” summarizing the arguments and a statement on the case (to be released to the press) explaining your opinion of the ruling Reporter (0): Job: Listen and take extensive notes during oral arguments Assignment: Write a news article explaining what happened during oral arguments, the result and significance of the case Warm Up We are starting Moot Court today! Why is this case worthy of being granted “cert”? Look at categories and list all that apply. Review Marbury v. Madison is significant because it established __________________. Justice Kagan’s dissenting opinion Moot Court Rules 1. Brief meeting with group 2. Petitioner Opening statement (brief) Questioning/Oral Argument (15-20 min.) 3. Respondent Opening statement (brief) Questioning/Oral Argument (15-20 min.) 4. Justices Discuss and decide by vote (20 min.) 6. Debrief and homework Post-Moot Court Debrief Did the Court rule based on judicial restraint or activism? Why? What might be the consequences of the Court’s decision? To each side? To society? Why was this case worthy of “cert”? Do you think this is or will be a landmark significant case? Why or why not? Share opinions: majority, concurring, dissenting Moot Court vs. Real Court Highlight/number as many arguments as you can. Most persuasive argument in the majority opinion: Most persuasive argument in the dissenting opinion: What is one argument in the majority opinion that we did not have in Moot Court? What is one argument in the dissenting opinion that we did not have in Moot Court? Attorney Homework Did you make your case based on constitutional principles (amendments), legal precedents (prior cases), or your own personal opinion? Explain. Was it difficult to argue for your side? Explain. What is your opinion of the court’s decision? What was the significance of the Court's decision? Did the decision change the meaning of the Constitution? Reporter Homework What happened during oral arguments? Explain the arguments from each side. Use three quotes to explain the justice’s position. Explain the decision and how it will affect the country (significance). Justices Homework Explain your ruling and how you ruled the way you did. Did you make your decision based on constitutional principles (amendments), legal precedents (prior cases), or your own personal opinion? Explain. Did you make your decision based on constitutional principles (amendments), legal precedents (prior cases), or your own personal opinion? Explain. In a CRIMINAL case… The first step in the process is “arrest” Step 1: Arrest In the U.S. justice system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. “Probable cause” must exist – Reasonable belief that a crime has been committed Probable Cause Case Study Case Study Questions Step 2: Arraignment Arraignment – first appearance before a judge Purpose: 1- determine if probable cause exists 2 – determine appropriate bond 8th Amendment Bond determined by: Prior criminal history Seriousness of offence Strength of evidence Ties to community Step 3: Pre-trial/plea bargaining Defendant and attorney can bargain with prosecutor (state) Purpose to end a case before trial begins 95%-98% decided this way Punishment is far worse if you are found guilty by a jury rather than punishment determined by plea bargain In your journal: Is this justice? Under what circumstances might an innocent person plead guilty? Plea Bargaining Case Study Step 4: The Trial Cases not plea bargained are tried through the trial process. In Connecticut, 6 jurors with two alternates for non-murder cases 12 jurors for murder cases “Burden of Proof” rests with state. All jurors must agree on verdict A “split” jury results in a mistrial, allowing the case to be re- tried Step 5: The appeal If a defendant is convicted after the trial, does he have any recourse? Yes! He may file an appeal. In order to raise an issue on appeal there must be a legal basis. The legal issue must exist in the record of the trial. (transcripts, evidence, documents) At this stage, the defendant bears the “burden of proof” Ex: Jury did not represent a “jury of peers”, evidence was insufficient… New trial: DNA or other new evidence