www. culturalcognition.net Lab Meeting # 9073 11.11.15 “I am you!” www. culturalcognition.net Lab Meeting # 9073 11.11.15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Roll call/intros CRT_2.0 & OCSI _2.0 Climate scientist worldview data “Living coastlines” #scicomm in SE Fla EBSFI Climate scientist worldview data Cultural Cognition Worldviews Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Hierarchy Environment: climate, nuclear hierarchical individualists Guns/Gun Control Gays military/gay parenting hierarchical communitarians Abortion procedure cats/stupid birds HPV Vaccination Individualism Communitarianism Gays military/gay parenting Environment: climate, nuclear Abortion procedure egalitarian individualists cats/stupid birds Guns/Gun Control egalitarian communitarians HPV Vaccination Egalitarianism www. culturalcognition.net Lab Meeting # 9073 11.11.15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Roll call/intros CRT_2.0 & OCSI _2.0 Climate scientist worldview data “Living coastlines” #scicomm in SE Fla EBSFI Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what “Science Curiosity Index” (SCI) “Science Curiosity Index” (SCI) 1 .8 closely Not at all .75 .7 very closely A little but not closely .9 .6 Prob. probability of pro-curiosity response NISCIENCE BSCIENCE 1 .5 .4 .5 .3 .25 .2 .1 0 0 -3 -2 -1 0 1 science curiosity Science Curiosity Index (SCI) 2 3 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -.5 0 SCI .5 1 Science Curiosity Index (SCI) 1.5 2 2.5 3 YIF Clip: Origins of color vision YIF Clip: Engagement The “missing audience hypothesis . . . ” Engagement “Natural audience hypothesis” ? “Missing audience hypothesis” Science Curiosity Latent class analysis Who are these guys???????!!!!! Cultural Cognition Worldviews Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Hierarchy Environment: climate, nuclear Guns/Gun Control Gays military/gay parenting Abortion procedure cats/stupid birds HPV Vaccination Individualism Gays military/gay parenting Communitarianism Environment: climate, nuclear Abortion procedure Guns/Gun Control cats/stupid birds HPV Vaccination Egalitarianism Cultural Cognition Worldviews Hierarchy Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Environment: climate, nuclear Guns/Gun Control Individualism Communitarianism Egalitarianism Dalets are pro-science/technology Evolution-science communication measurement problem: confounding What we know Who we are & “Human beings, as we know them today, developed from earlier species of animals.” (True/false) probability of correct answer 11 .9 .9 .8 .8 Below avg. religiosity .7 .7 .6 .6 .5 .5 .4 .4 Above avg. religiosity .3 .3 .2 .2 .1 .1 00 -2.5 14th percentile -1 2nd percentile -2.5 -1 50th percentile 00 86th 11 percentile 2.5percentile 98th 2.5 Ordinary science intelligence Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence Kahan, D.M. Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem. Advances in Political Psychology 36, 1-43 (2015). Evolution-science communication measurement problem: unconfounding What we know Who we are & “Human beings, as we know them today, developed from earlier species of animals.” (True/false) probability of correct answer 11 .9 .9 .8 .8 Below avg. religiosity .7 .7 .6 .6 .5 .5 .4 .4 Above avg. religiosity .3 .3 .2 .2 .1 .1 00 -2.5 14th percentile -1 2nd percentile -2.5 -1 50th percentile 00 86th 11 percentile 2.5percentile 98th 2.5 Ordinary science intelligence Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence Kahan, D.M. Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem. Advances in Political Psychology 36, 1-43 (2015). Evolution-science measurement problem: What we know entangling & Who we are Evolution-science measurement problem: How to disentangle from What we know Who we are Evolution-science measurement problem: How to disentangle from What we know Who we are ? Evolution disbelievers . . . . Request full documentary 100% 100% Evolution believer 75% 50% Evolution disbeliever probability probability 75% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 1st 16th 50th 84th Evolution believer Evolution disbeliever 1st 99th Science Curiosity Index (percentile) 16th 50th 84th 99th Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) “It seemed like the documentary supplied strong evidence of how humans acquired color vision.” Evolution believer 100% 100% 75% 75% Evolution disbeliever 50% Prob. of agreeing Prob. of agreeing Evolution believer 50% Evolution disbeliever 25% 25% 0% 0% 1st 16th 50th 84th Science Curiosity Index (percentile) Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence 99th 1st 16th 50th 84th 99th Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) Cogntive dualism Pakistani Dr Kentucky Farmer Cogntive dualism Krista . . . . Request full show: Evolution “believers” vs. “disbelievers” 100% probability of requesting full show probability 1 Krista! Aidan 75% .75 Evolution believer Evolution believer 50% .5 Evolution disbeliever .25 25% Evolution disbeliever 00% 1st-2 -1 16th 050th 1 84th Science Interest (percentile) science interest Science Curiosity (percentie) Science Curiosity Logistic regression. Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence 2 99th Evolution disbelievers . . . . Request full documentary 100% 100% Krista! Evolution believer 75% 50% Evolution disbeliever probability 75% probability Aidan 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 1st 16th 50th 84th Evolution believer Evolution disbeliever 1st 99th Science Curiosity Index (percentile) 16th 50th 84th 99th Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) “It seemed like the documentary supplied strong evidence of how humans acquired color vision.” Aidan Evolution believer 100% 100% Krista! Evolution disbeliever 50% Prob. of agreeing Prob. of agreeing Evolution believer 75% 75% 50% Evolution disbeliever 25% 25% 0% 0% 1st 16th 50th 84th Science Curiosity Index (percentile) Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence 99th 1st 16th 50th 84th 99th Odinary Science Intelligence (percentile) The ESFI disentanglement project: Satisfying the curiosity of all the citizens of the liberal republic of science! Prob. of requesting full documentary probability 100% 75% Evolution believer 50% 25% Evolution disbeliever 0% 1st 16th Colored bars reflect 0.95 level of confidence (including color-vision challenged monkeys!) 50th 84th ScienceCuriosity Interest (percentile) Science (percentie) 99th Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what * * * * Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what * “you tell me!” * * * The ESCI concept Kahan, D.M. Making Climate-Science Communication Evidence-Based—All the Way Down. in Culture, Politics and Climate Change (ed. M. Boykoff & D. Crow) 203-220 (Routledge Press, New York, 2014). The ESCI concept The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: #Scicomm Researcher: The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: #Scicomm Professional: I dunno. You tell me! The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. #Scicomm Researcher: Cool! The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. #Scicomm Researcher: Cool! Try it & I’ll measure! The ESCI concept The standard exchange— #Scicomm Professional: So, what should I do? #Scicomm Researcher: I dunno. You tell me! #Scicomm Professional: Well, this might be analogous to what you did in the lab. #Scicomm Researcher: #scicomm professional Cool! Try it & I’ll measure! #scicomm researcher Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what * “you tell me!” * * * Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what * “you tell me!” * More analyses * * Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what * “you tell me!” * More analyses * MA experiments (spring Annenberg) * Evidence-based Science Filmmaking Initiative 1. Study 1 recap 2. Now what * “you tell me!” * More analyses * MA experiments (spring Annenberg) * SCI_1.0 validation, pt 2