Leveraged Buyout Market -What Happened? -Where Are We? -Where Are We Going? Presented by: Elias Sabo, Partner Compass Group Management, LLC April 2009 – FEI: 6th Annual Scholarship Awards Banquet Table of Contents Introductions LBO Boom In Perspective Growth & Collapse Of The Leverage Market The Current Market Equity Buyouts – Are They An Alternative? What Should You Expect from Debt and Equity Sponsors? Compass Group Management Overview Compass Group Management LLC (“Compass”) is an external manager making investments in high return assets on behalf of two primary investment pools: – Compass Diversified Holdings (“CODI”): Publicly traded holding company with approximately $1 billion of capitalization targeting middle market buyouts – currently over $400 million of availability to consummate acquisitions. – Kattegat Trust: Philanthropic organization which has provided over $350mm of equity capital to invest opportunistically in high return assets. CODI is the first U.S. listed, pure play private equity vehicle. – Offering completed May 16, 2006 with four initial controlled companies (currently six). – CODI provides 100% of the capital needed to consummate acquisitions allowing: • NO FINANCING CONTINGENCIES • Streamlined diligence process • Reduced time to close • Increased confidentiality – Diversified portfolio and public structure reduces cost of capital. – Permanent capital base removes need to exit around fund cycles. End of the Party After hours at the New York Stock Exchange, 1938. (BettmanCorbis) The Boom Years • Starting in 2002, the economy experienced a dramatic boom in growth. – Nominal GDP grew 36% (5.3% CAGR) between 2002 and 2008. – S&P 500 grew 67% (10.8% CAGR) between 2002 and 2007. US Debt Outstandings as a % of GDP ( Nominal GDP in $Trillions) 380.0% $1,600 $1,468 $1,418 360.0% $1,248 $1,112 340.0% $1,400 $1,200 $1,212 $1,000 $880 $903 $800 320.0% $10.5 300.0% 2002 $10.9 2003 $11.7 2004 $12.4 2005 $13.2 2006 US Debt Outstandings as a % o f GDP Source: Bureau of Economic Advisors and Yahoo Finance $13.8 2007 $14.3 $600 $400 2008 S&P 500 Note: Nominal GDP in Red Expansion Of Money Supply Asset Class Expansion US Leveraged Loans Outstanding: – Grew from $13.6 billion in 1996 to $132.5 billion in 2002 (46% CAGR). – Further grew from $132.5 billion in 2002 to $596.1 billion in 2008 (28% CAGR). US Home Mortgage Debt Outstanding: – Grew from $6.0 trillion in 2002 to $10.4 trillion in 2008 (9.6% CAGR). US Consumer Household Debt: – Grew from $2.0 trillion in 2002 to $2.6 trillion in 2008 (4.4% CARG). US Financial Sector Debt Outstanding (excludes non regulated financial companies): – Grew from $1.0 trillion in 2002 to $17.3 trillion in 2008 (60.8% CAGR). According to a market survey report performed by the International Swaps and Derivatives association, it is estimated that credit swaps on CDOs and other contracts not captured on the DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse may exceed $47 trillion, representing a 100 fold increase over the past decade. Growth of Middle Market Leveraged Loans 60 $25.0 50 $20.0 40 $15.0 30 $10.0 20 $5.0 10 $0.0 0 2001 2002 2003 MM Sponsor Source: Standard and Poor's 4Q08 review and Middle Market Lenders 2004 2005 2006 MM Lead Agents 2007 2008 # of Agents $ in billions MM Sponsor Volume vs. # Lead Agents $30.0 An Excess of Debt Issuances • Leveraged buyout levels reached unprecedented levels in 2006 and 2007 vs. average 1998-2005 levels. Middle Market Total Leveraged Market $600.0 60.0% $535.1 $25.0 25% $22.5 $20.9 $480.1 $500.0 50.0% 40.0% $246.1 $300.0 30.0% $207.6 $200.0 $ in Billions $ in Billions 20% $16.7 $241.4 $400.0 $20.0 $15.0 15% $10.0 10% 20.0% $153.2 $234.0 $100.0 $5.0 $293.7 $130.6 $94.7 $77.0 0.0% 1998-2005 Average Total Sponsor 2006 2007 Total Non-Sponsor Source: Standard & Poor's 4Q08 Leveraged Buyout Review 5% $- 0% 10.0% $58.4 $0.0 $5.0 1998-2005 Average 2008 % Sponsor MM Sponsor 2006 2007 2008 % of Total Sponsor Leverage Credit Products Issued With Borrower Friendly Terms Covenant Lite Loans By Volume and Number From 1997 - 1Q 2009 Volume Number $120 140 125 120 96.6 $100 100 In Billions $80 80 $60 60 $40 37 40 23.6 $20 19 Source: Standard & Poor’s 1 0 2008 1Q09 4 2007 1 2006 3 2005 2001 1998 1997 0 NA 2004 1 2003 2 2002 2 2000 12 0.0 1Q09 2008 2007 2.5 2006 0.1 2004 2003 NA 0.5 2002 1999 1998 1997 $0 0.3 0.02 2001 0.3 2000 1.8 2.4 2005 3.1 1999 20 Loan Market Share: Banks vs. Non-Banks Primary Market for Highly Leveraged Loans 100% Non-banks 75% 50% Banks 25% 20 06 20 07 Ja nJu l0 A ug 7 -D ec 20 07 08 (A 20 ll) 08 (N ew ) 20 04 20 05 20 02 20 03 20 00 20 01 19 98 19 99 19 96 19 97 19 94 19 95 0% Non-banks include: institutional investors, insurance companies, finance companies and securities firms Excludes all left and right agent commitments (including administrative, syndication and documentation agent as well as arranger) For 2Q08, All Deals includes block sales like TXU while New Deals include only deals launched and structured this year New Funding Sources Emerge – Leveraged Buyouts • New sources arose with the flood of money entering the system and funneled funds to private equity and other users. Leveraged Buyout Loans 2006 Agents 2009 Agents Long Term Funded Finance Co.’s Long Term Funded Finance Co.’s Commercial Banks Commercial Banks Short Term Funded, Securitized Finance Co.’s / CLOs Short Term Funded, Securitized Finance Co.’s / CLOs - INACTIVE BDCs BDCs - INACTIVE Low-Leveraged Hedge Funds Low-Leveraged Hedge Funds Public Finance Co.’s Public Finance Co.’s Investment Banks Investment Banks - INACTIVE Highly Leveraged Hedge Funds Highly Leveraged Hedge Funds - INACTIVE New Funding Sources Emerge – Other Assets • Other sectors of the economy also benefited from new funding sources. • Funding Intermediaries created a variety of exotic instruments. Other Asset Classes Industry • Mortgages Financial Product Innovation: • Home Equity Loans • (Option) Adjustable Rate Mortgages • Interest Only Mortgages • Consumer • • • • • • Corporate • Asset Backed Securities • CLOs, CDOs, CBOs • Credit Linked Notes • Credit Default Swaps & Baskets • Credit Enhancements • Constant Proportion Debt Obligation • Municipalities • (Preferred) Auction Rate Securities • Tender Option Bonds Structured Investment Vehicles (SIV) Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDN) Credit Cards Student Loans Auto Loans Improved Credit Terms Resulted Percent of Institutional Tranches Priced Inside of L+300 bp for deals rated BB- or higher 100% 98% 100% 94% 89% 75% 71% 69% 50% 46% 39% 33% 31% 24% 25% 0% 0% 1998 (70) 1999 (90) 2000 (91) 2001(88) L+200 bp or Less Source: Standard & Poor‘s 2002 (118) 2003 2004 2005 (104) (148) (118) Period (Observations) L+212.5 bp - L+237.5 bp 2006 (91) 2007 (62) 2008 (51) 1Q09 (0) L+250 bp - L+287.5 bp And Purchase Price Multiples Increased - LBOs • Higher risk tolerance was a function of lower returns. • Seeking higher yields, investors sought out riskier securities. Competition led to pricing at historical lows, looser covenants, relaxed terms and support for higher leverage multiples. • A fundamental flaw was that acquisitions were priced assuming continued economic growth or stability. Large vs. Mid. Market LBO Purchase Multiples (Mid. Market Multiple Displayed By Capitalization) 12.0x 10.2x 10.0x 9.3x 8.8x xEBITDA 8.3x 8.1x 7.7x 8.0x 9.8x 7.1x 6.0x 59% 58% 5.4x 54% 3.6x 0.9x 0.4x 0.6x 0.8x 0.0x 62% 3.3x 4.0x 2.0x 4.1x 3.5x 3.3x 42% 3.0x 1998-2005 19982005 MM Equity Cap Source: Standard & Poor's 4Q08 Leveraged Buyout Review 41% 2006 46% 38% 2006 MM Sub. Debt Cap 2007 3.8x 2007 MM Sr. Debt Cap 2008 Large LBO Multip 2008 Where Else Did Asset Prices Increase? - Housing Where Else Did Asset Prices Increase? - Commodities 17 Components: Includes Livestock, Agriculture, Energy and Metals The Reckoning Begins The Bubble Bursts Inflation Adjusted US House Price Index and Stock Prices, 2003-2009 Source: Case-Shiller; Dow Jones, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. All indices inflation adjusted by the CPL Rising Payment Default Rates Are Beginning Percent of Outstanding Leveraged Loans in Payment Default or Bankruptcy 15.0% 9.9% 10.0% 10.0% 7.0% 5.0% 7.6% 7.4% 4.0% 3.7% 3.6% 2.6% 1.0% 1.9% 1.0% 0.6% 0.0% As of •Includes all loans including those not included in the LSTA/LPC mark-to-market service. •Vast majority are institutional tranches. Source: Standard & Poor’s LCD and S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index 00 9 3/ 27 /2 08 E2 0 Y 07 E2 0 Y 06 E2 0 Y 05 E2 0 Y 04 E2 0 Y 03 E2 0 Y 02 E2 0 Y 01 E2 0 Y 00 E2 0 Y 99 E1 9 Y 98 E1 9 Y 97 E1 9 Y Y E1 9 96 0.0% Earnings Pressures Lead to Exercised PIKs • Switching on a PIK toggle helps a company buy breathing room and preserve its cash until its financial situation improves. • PIK toggles — much like covenant-lite loans — still don’t address fundamental problems that a company faces. –While they buy breathing room, bankruptcy is still a possibility. What Happens to Height of Market Valuations? • If 2009 valuations drop to average levels from 1998-2005 (7.1x EBITDA), it translates to a destruction of 62% for Equity assuming constant debt levels. –This drop in value is prior to any decline in EBITDA levels. xEBITDA Middle Market Capitalizations Assuming a return to 1998-2005 average purchase price multiples 10.0x 9.0x 8.0x 7.0x 6.0x 5.0x 4.0x 3.0x 2.0x 1.0x 0.0x 9.3x 3.5x 62% decline in equity value 7.1x 0.4x 1.3x 0.4x 5.4x 5.4x 2007 2009 Sr. Debt Sub. Debt Equity Is There An End In Sight? • Forced sales of defaulted ABS vehicles flooded the secondary market. –Secondary prices dropped dramatically, with bids at the end of January at 70 for actively traded names and 64 for leveraged middle market, lightly traded accounts. • Secondary market trends create a challenge for new issue pricing due to relative value analysis. Monthly Bid Prices by Market Size 105 100 95 Bid Price 90 85 80 75 70 65 Flow Names Middle Market Source: Standard and Poor's LoanStatsWeekly Supplemental and LSTA Weekly Secondary Spreads 9 20 0 15 / 1/ 5/ 20 08 8 11 /1 15 / 20 0 8 9/ 15 / 20 0 8 Large Corporates 7/ 15 / 20 0 8 5/ 15 / 20 0 8 3/ 20 0 15 / 1/ 5/ 20 07 7 11 /1 15 / 20 0 7 9/ 15 / 20 0 7 7/ 15 / 20 0 7 5/ 20 0 15 / 3/ 1/ 15 / 20 0 7 60 A Glimmer of Hope? What Strategies Are Equity Sponsors Employing? Equity Buyout Example Leveraged Buyout Equity Buyout $100 Million $100 Million EBITDA $860 Million Purchase 8.6x EBITDA $550 Million 5.5x EBITDA Initial EBITDA: Purchase Price: Purchase Multiple: Debt Invested: Equity Invested: EBITDA Growth/Year: EBITDA in Year 4: Special Dividend (4x): EBITDA Year 5: Sale Price at 7x: Profit: Key Facts LBO EBO $100 $100 $860 $550 8.6x 5.5x $645 $0 $215 $550 10% 10% $146 $146 $0 $586 $161 $161 $1,127 $1,127 $267 $577 •Less Debt $645 Million Debt $0 $215 Million Equity $550 Million IRR Return: 17.5% •Includes Dividend •Less Debt 17.5% Equity Buyout Example Leveraged Buyout Equity Buyout $100 Million $100 Million EBITDA 10% Annually EBITDA Growth Year 4: Special 1-Time Dividend (4x EBITDA, paid via debt-issuance) $161 Million Key Facts LBO EBO $100 $100 $860 $550 8.6x 5.5x $645 $0 $215 $550 10% 10% $146 $146 $0 $586 $161 $161 $1,127 $1,127 $267 $577 Year 5 10% Annually $586 Million Initial EBITDA: Purchase Price: Purchase Multiple: Debt Invested: Equity Invested: EBITDA Growth/Year: EBITDA in Year 4: Special Dividend (4x): EBITDA Year 5: Sale Price at 7x: Profit: •Less Debt $161 Million EBITDA IRR Return: •Includes Dividend •Less Debt 17.5% Leveraged Buyout 17.5% Equity Buyout Year 5 $1.1 Billion Sale $1.1 Billion $267 Million Profit $577 Million 7x EBITDA ~17.5% IRR ~17.5% IRR Predicting The Future – Intermediate Term Deal Flow: – Deal flow will return to historical returns, but remain low given economic uncertainty. – Funds that depended on financial engineering to drive returns will be distracted by tripped covenants, liquidity challenges and potential brand damage for future fund raises. Holding Period: – Given the lackluster IPO market, Strategics’ focus on current operations and most Sponsors frozen given the credit markets, exit opportunities will be minimal. – Quick flips will fade as historical hold periods of 5+ years return. Sponsor Returns: – Funds that fully invested 2006-2008 may not be able to return capital to investors. – Funds not fully invested may be able to average down their portfolio’s average purchase price and improve returns going forward What Is The New Normal For Lendors? Multiples: – 2.5x EBITDA is the norm for senior multiples (maybe 3x for pristine operating profiles). – 3.5-4.0x for total leverage (mezzanine, subordinated debt) vs. 2007’s 6x – In 2009, leverage multiples for a stable, recession-resistant, cash flow transaction are expected to be no greater than 2.50x senior and up to 3.75x total (+/- 0.25x). Debt Pricing: – Senior debt is more expensive at L+650 to L+700 – Including Libor floors of 2-3% and upfront fees of 3%, all-in pricing approaches 11.5-13%. Impact on Transaction Pricing? – 40% equity translates to 5.8-6.6x EBITDA purchase multiples vs. 8.3-9.3x for 2008 & 2007. What Is The New Normal For Equity Sponsors? Pre-Transaction Company Differentiation (Pre-LOI): – What is the company’s reason to exist? – Unique product lines, customer relationships, etc. Heightened Due Diligence: – More information requested and in greater granularity – Deeper understanding of company attributes – Longer periods to close post-LOI. Has EBITDA stabilized? Was that new customer account signed? Impact on Transaction Pricing? More Expensive Debt + Higher Equity Contributions + Heightened Economic Uncertainty Lower Purchase Multiples What Is The New Normal For Equity Sponsors? Post-Transaction OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS More Intense Focus on Portfolio Companies: – Expect greater involvement by equity sponsors on a weekly (if not daily) basis. – Be ready to defend proposed investments. • What is the ROI on the investment? Is it possible to accelerate the payback of the investment? Is the investment nice to have or a must have? – More accountability of senior management teams – Are current investments in HR and Capital appropriate given current business levels? Strategic Initiatives – Does it make sense to acquire / merge? – Divestitures of non-core operations – Heightened scrutiny of non-income producing investments Questions? Compass Group Management