Election Risk Map Report

advertisement

ELECTORAL RISK MANAGEMENT ELECTION DAY

REPORT ON 2015 PRESIDENTIAL AND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

ELECTIONS

Incidents of Violence and Theft of Election Materials

Prepared by: INEC Electoral Risk Management (ERM) Team

April 7, 2015

Introduction

The Independent National Electoral Commission is implementing an Electoral Risk Management (ERM) project to support its activities during the 2015 national and State elections using the Electoral Risk Management Tool (ERMTool). In the run-up to the elections, the ERM team identified and analysed a series of risk factors and indicators covering the pre-election period. The subsequent risk alerts were shared with the INEC leadership to help improve their situational awareness in the lead-up to election.

For the March 28 Presidential and National Assembly elections, the ERM team identified a number of election day and post election factors to analyse during and immediately after the election. The team moved into the INEC situation room on March 27 and remained in place until the announcement of final election results on March 31/April 1. During this time, the team produced a series of risk alerts that were shared with the INEC leadership. This report is a compilation of all risk alerts produced – along with analysis and recommendations aimed at improving the conduct of the State elections scheduled for April 11, 2015.

Methodology and Data Sources :

The ERM team established a desk in the INEC situation room from March 27-March 31. The team was composed of seven INEC staff members and was supervised by the Chief Technical Adviser to the INEC Chairman. The team received additional support from the International IDEA programme officer as well as the IFES Electoral Security Expert. The team developed risk alerts by collecting data from ERM desk officers, INEC supervisors in the field, the

Election Operation Supports Center (EOSC) desk in the situation room, the INEC Citizens Call Centre (ICCC) in the situation room as well as through online sources such as the media and social media (for incidents of electoral violence).

To source data in the field, particularly on election day, the ERM team used the ERM desk officers and INEC supervisors. A plan to collect data from the field through online questionnaires was only partially successful due to the lack of internet connectivity in the situation room on election day. As a result, the majority of the information obtained from the field was via telephone interviews at regular intervals using pre-prepared questionnaires to obtain information. It should be noted that data obtained from the field is not necessarily comprehensive, but represents the information Field

Officers had at hand at the time of the telephone interviews.

Any information obtained via social media platforms to identify incidents of election-related violence were only included once the information had been confirmed or verified by an official or secondary source in the media or from official Statements.

Numerical values and Risk Values:

The values in each of the maps were developed in the election day operational plan developed prior to election day.

ELECTION DAY ALERTS

5 LGAs reporting that they do not have incident report forms

ERM RISK MAP ON

AVAILABILITY OF ELECTION

MATERIALS

AS AT 2pm

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

Reported shortages of ballot papers across the

State

Reported shortages of material across the State

Reports of shortages of results forms in Ukwa

West (whole LGA)

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reported shortages

MEDIUM: Isolated reported shortages

HIGH: Major shortages

Data source:

ERM State desk officers based in State Election

Operations Support Centre (phone interviews)

ERM RISK MAP ON

PRESENCE OF SECURITY

PERSONNEL 28 th March

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reported absences of personnel

MEDIUM: 0-1% of PUs reporting absence of personnel

HIGH: More than 1% of PUs reporting absence of personnel

Data source:

ERM State desk officers based in State Election Operations

Support Centre (phone interviews)

ERM RISK MAP ON

START OF VOTING

AS AT 5pm

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

House of Reps

Election

Postponed till

Sunday 29th 2015

No election in Udu LGA

RISK LEVEL

LOW: All PUs voting as of 5pm

MEDIUM: 75-100% of PUs voting

HIGH: Less than 75% of PUs voting

Data source:

ERM State desk officers based in State Election

Operations Support Centre (phone interviews)

ERM RISK MAP ON

AVAILABILITY OF

MATERIAL AS OF 5PM

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

Reported shortages of ballot papers across the

State

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reported shortages

MEDIUM: Isolated shortages

HIGH: Major shortages

Data source:

ERM State desk officers based in State Election Operations

Support Centre (phone interviews)

Anambra

Awka-Ibom

ERM RISK MAP ON

SUCCESSFUL

ACCREDITATION

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

RISK LEVEL

LOW (0-1% OF PU REPORTING AUTHENTICATION FAILURE )

MEDIUM (1-5% OF PUS REPORTING AUTHENTICATION

FAILURE)

HIGH (6-100% OF PUS REPORTING AUTHENTICATION

FAILURE )

High percentage of failed finger print authentication of votes in majority of the States. But no issues reported with voter card verification as of 1PM

Data source:

ERM Desk Officers in the State

ERM RISK MAP ON

CLOSE OF

VOTING AS OF 6PM

Mapped by INEC-ERM Team

29 th March 2015

RISK LEVEL

LOW (VOTING FINISHED IN ALL PUS )

MEDIUM (VOTING FINISHED IN 80-99% OF PUS)

HIGH (VOTING FINISHED IN 0-79% OF PUS)

Data source:

ERM Desk Officers in the State

ERM RISK MAP ON NUMBER

OF PUS STILL COUNTING

VOTES AS OF 8PM ON MARCH

28

Mapped by INEC-ERM Team

29 th March 2015

RISK LEVEL

LOW (COUNTING FINISHED IN ALL PUS)

MEDIUM (COUNTING FINISHED IN 80-99% OF PUS)

HIGH (COUNTING FINISHED IN 0-79% OF PUS)

Data source:

ERM Desk Officers in the State

POST-ELECTION ALERTS

KOGI

VALID VOTES: 421,328

INVALID VOTES: 17,959

OYO

VALID VOTES: 928,606

INVALID VOTES: 47,254

OSUN

VALID VOTES: 642,615

INVALID VOTES: 20,758

OGUN

VALID VOTES: 533,17

INVALID VOTES: 26,441

ONDO

VALID VOTES: 561,056

INVALID VOTES: 21,379

EKITI

VALID VOTES: 300,691

INVALID VOTES: 8,754

NASSARAWA

VALID VOTES: 511,547

INVALID VOTES: 10,094

FCT

VALID VOTES: 306,805

INVALID VOTES: 9210

ENUGU

VALID VOTES: 306,805

INVALID VOTES: 9210

ERM RISK MAP ON

COLLATION OF

ELECTION RESULTS

AT 1PM

Developed by INEC-ERM

Team

30 th March 2015

RISK LEVEL

LOW (StateS THAT HAVE DELIVERED

THE RESULT SHEET)

MEDIUM (StateS YET TO DELIVER

RESULT SHEET)

INCIDENTS RELATED TO

ELECTION DAY AND THE

POST-ELECTION PERIOD

RISK MAPS ON ELECTION RELATED VIOLENT INCIDENTS

The Risk Maps in the following pages show results of data gathered on election related violence that occurred during the election and post-election periods.

No colour code is given to the map. The maps highlight number of incidents that occurred in the States as well as type of incidents. Description boxes on the map provide more information on the incidents.

Maps were from the 28

th

of March till the 30

th

of March.

Boko Haram attack voters in Ngalda

LGA, 3 people reported killed.

ERM RISK MAP ON

ELECTION DAY VIOLENT

INCIDENTS

AS OF 4PM

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

1

Reports of violent incidents in Katcha

LGA, Ward 1, Unit

005 and 007

2

PDP member was murdered in Ikirun,

Ifelodun LGA of

Osun State by unknown gunmen

3

1

2

2

1 1

1

3

One person shot dead at Eleme LGA by an army official

1

1

Boko Haram attack two PUs in Birnin

Bolawa and Birin

Fulani in Nafada district. At least 2 people reported dead

Gunmen shoot at a team of policemen and military police escorting INEC officials to their PU at Ikwerre LGA

Explosions at a PU in Umuokpara

Primary School, ward 1, Awka,

Anambra

#

#

Key:

- Number of

Incidents

- Bombing incident

Number of incidents as at 4pm

20 incidents

Data Source: ERM State Desk Officers based in

State Election Operations Support Centre, Media reports

Snatching of ballot box at gunpoint in

AMAC, Gui unit

7 election officials beaten and materials snatched at Moba LGA, Ward

11.

Two people shot dead at Eleme LGA.

3

1

2

3

2

1

3

2

1

4

1 2

1

1

Boko Haram attack voters in Ngalda

LGA, 3 people reported killed.

1

ERM RISK MAP ON

ELECTION DAY VIOLENT

INCIDENTS

AS OF 7PM

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

1

1

Boko Haram attack two PUs in Birnin

Bolawa and Birin

Fulani in Nafada district. At least 2 people reported dead

Gunmen shoot at a team of policemen and military police escorting INEC officials to their PU at Ikwerre LGA

1

Poll pfficial held hostage in Yola

North, Doubeli ward, PU 001

Threat and destruction of materials before voting proceeded at

PU 18/21/02/013 and 18/03/03/010

#

Key:

- Number of

Incidents

- Bombing incident

Number of incidents as at 7pm

31 incidents

Data Source: ERM State Desk Officers based in

State Election Operations Support Centre,

Media reports

1

4

Snatching of ballot box at gunpoint in

AMAC, Gui unit

2

1

7 election officials beaten and materials snatched at

Moba LGA,

Ward 11.

3

Two people shot dead at Eleme LGA.

1

2

3

2

1

4

1 2

1

1

1

1

Boko Haram attack voters in Ngalda

LGA, 3 people reported killed.

ERM RISK MAP ON

ELECTION DAY VIOLENT

INCIDENTS

AS OF 8PM

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

28 th March

1

2

Gunmen shoot at a team of policemen and military police escorting INEC officials to their PU at Ikwerre LGA

Boko Haram attack two PUs in Birnin

Bolawa and Birin

Fulani in Nafada district. At least 2 people reported dead

1

Poll official held hostage in Yola

North, Doubeli ward, PU 001

Threat and destruction of materials before voting proceeded at

PU 18/21/02/013 and 18/03/03/010

Key:

# - Number of

Incidents

- Bombing incident

Number of incidents as at 8pm

35 incidents

Data Source: ERM State Desk Officers based in

State Election Operations Support Centre, Media reports

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

30 March: Female members of APC, protested in Port

Harcourt calling for cancellation of the election

ERM RISK MAP ON

POST- ELECTION VIOLENT

INCIDENTS

FROM MARCH 29 th to

30th

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

30 th March

30 March: A protester is shot dead by a military officer at INEC headquarters

Bauchi

There have been reports of postelection protests in Oyo, Osun,

Enugu, Abia,

Bauchi, Akwa

Ibom, Plateau and

Rivers State .

Key:

# - Number of

Incidents

Number of Post

Election violent incidents

10 incidents

Data Source: ERM State Desk Officers,

Media reports

RISK MAPS ON THEFT OF ELECTION MATERIALS

The Risk Maps in the following pages show results of data gathered on reports of theft or snatching of Ballot Papers, Ballot Boxes, Card Readers, Result Forms and other sensitive material across the 6 geo-political zones, during the result collation and counting process.

A 2-risk level scale is applied to this risk factor.

Any incident of Election Material theft is recorded as high risk, while non occurrence is recorded as low risk.

States with no data are not assigned any colour code.

The data may not be comprehensive but represents the reports the ERM team collected from INEC field staff. Data was gathered and recorded as at 9pm of 29

th

April 2015.

THEFT OF ELECTORAL MATERIAL – NORTH-EAST ZONE

Bauchi

1) Reports that SPOs ran away with results sheets but they were replaced and the culprits arrested in Bauchi LGA (EC8A)

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

29 th March

Taraba

1) Reports that voting materials were snatched from officials of a PU in Kasim

Lamido LGA

2) Reports that election materials were snatched and burnt and INEC officials were beaten at RA 04 PU 005 in Ibbi LGA

Adamawa

1) Reports that results sheets were snatched

(EC8B) in Pallam RA, Madaggali LGA

2) Reports of snatching of sensitive material in

Numan LGA RA 10 PU 005

Data source:

ERM State desk officers; INEC State supervisors;

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reports

HIGH: Reports of theft

THEFT OF ELECTORAL MATERIAL – NORTH CENTRAL

ZONE

FCT

1) Reports of ballot box snatching at AMAC (PU 007) Gui

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

29 th March

Nassarawa

1) Reports of materials hijacked and results cancelled in

Agwantashi ward in Obi LGA.

2) Reports that election was cancelled due to the theft of sensitive material in Adudoimo PU in Obi LGA

Niger

1) Reports that in 10 polling units, ballot boxes were hijacked and burnt in Gbako LGA. The following PUs affected: 26/08/04/003, 26/08/04/004,

26/08/04/005, 26/08/04/008, 26/08/05/004,

26/08/06/001, 26/08/06/003, 26/08/06/006 and

26/08/10/004

Plateau

1) Reports of card readers destroyed in Shaubutu and

Danto wards in Riyom LGA

2) Reports that all polling material including card readers were destroyed in Bun Ward, Riyom

LGA

Benue

1) Reports of burnt card reader in Nyiev ward in Guma LGA

2) Reports of results sheet snatching at

Gwer East LGA (PU 07/07/05/004)

3) Reports that 6 PUs in a ward did not vote

4) Reports that office INEC was using in

Logo LGA was burnt.

5) Reports that 2 INEC Ad Hoc staff were killed.

Kogi

1) Reports that results were burnt at the

Ofu LGA collation centre

Data source:

ERM State desk officers; INEC State supervisors;

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reports

HIGH: Reports of theft

THEFT OF ELECTORAL MATERIAL – NORTH-WEST

ZONE

KATSTINA

1.

2 ballot box snatched in

Sokoto North LGA

SOKOTO

1.

2 ballot box snatched in Sokoto North LGA

2.

2 incident of Ballot paper snatching in

Shagari LGA

3.

2 Smart Card Reader incident damaged in

Sokoto North LGA

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

29 th March

KANO

1.

Snatching of SCR at

Minjibir LGA 19/30/012

2.

Ballot papers destroyed at Rogo LGA

19/20/003

3.

Ballot box Burnt at

Kabo LGA 19/20/00

KADUNA

1.

Ballot paper snatched before counting in PU

018, RA 05 in LGA

Data source:

ERM State desk officers; INEC State supervisors;

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reports

HIGH: Reports of theft

THEFT OF ELECTORAL MATERIAL – SOUTH EAST

ZONE

Anambra

1) No data

Imo

1) Reports that material was snatched at Mbaitoli

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

29 th March

Ebonyi

1) Reports that the vehicle conveying POs and APOs was vandalised and electoral materials snatched for PUs 001-006 in

Ikwo LGA, Expanwudele 004

Abia

1) Reports that results sheets were not released to many PUs.

2) In Aba South LGA, no collation officers were deployed to the field.

3) In Osisioma and Isiala Ngwa LGAs reports of thefts of ballot boxes. Additional reports that trained SPOs and NYSC members were not used/replaced.

4) Reports of ballot snatching in Aruchukwu

01/03/06/004

5) Reports of fake collation officers with fake phone numbers in most LGAs

6) Reports of widespread snatching of ballots and results forms.

7) No E-tracking and forwarding of scanned form

ECSA in Ohafia, Arochukwu, Umahia North and

Umhia South LGAs

Data source:

ERM State desk officers; INEC State supervisors;

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reports

HIGH: Reports of theft

THEFT OF ELECTORAL MATERIAL – SOUTH SOUTH

ZONE

Edo

1) In LGA Igueben: Ward 9 Unit 1 & 2;

Ward 10 unit 4; Ward 5 unit 4: fighting led to the prevention of fighting preventing results from coming out

Commission investigating

2) Reports of violence breaking out in

Akoko LGA in RA9, PU 011 which forced poll officials to run for protection and they abandoned senstive materials.

When they returned ballots were thumbprinted so the election was not conducted.

Mapped by INEC ERM Team on

29 th March

Cross River

1) In Akankpa LGA, where voting was due to take place on 29 March, ballot papers for 2 wards were hijacked before reaching the PUs. The ballots were reportedly pre-marked at the LGA Chairman’s house.

2) In Calabar municipality, 4 results sheet were stolen by a Corper. The collation officer declared the results missing. The results were later recovered, but the CO refused to accept them. The 4 results sheets would change the outcome of the election and result in a victory for the Labour party. Labour party supporters are currently protesting outside the INEC LGA office and making threats.

Bayelsa

1) Reports of snatching of materials at

Yenagoa, Ward 5, unit 15 and 16

Data source:

ERM State desk officers; INEC State supervisors;

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reports

HIGH: Reports of theft

Theft/Destruction of Electoral Material –South West

Reports of theft or snatching of ballots, ballot boxes, card readers, results sheets and other sensitive material

OSUN

1) Reports of snatching of ballot box at Ife South LGA, Ward 10, unit 003.

EKITI

1) Reports of snatching of 5 card readers at Moba LGA, Ward 7,

Unit 009. The card readers were later recovered

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 29March 2015

Data source:

ERM state desk officers; INEC state supervisors.

ONDO

1) Reports of snatching of ballot box at Ilaje

LGA, Ward 5, unit 17.

2) Report of snatching of a card reader at

Akure South LGA, Ward 9

RISK LEVEL

LOW: No reports

HIGH: Reports of theft

POST-ELECTION ANALYSIS

Voter turnout: March 28, 2015 presidential elections

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 31March 2015

National Average: 47.09%

Data source: INEC

Legend

Less than 30%

31%-40%

41%-50%

51%-60%

Over 60%

ERM RISK MAP ON

VOTER TURNOUT:

MARCH 28, 2015

PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTIONS

National Average: 47.09%

Legend

% % turnout

Less than 30%

31%-40%

41%-50%

51%-60%

Over 60%

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 31

March 2015

Data source: INEC

Note: percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number

ERM RISK MAP ON

NUMBER OF VALID AND

REJECTED VOTES CAST

LEGEND

VALID VOTES

REJECTED

VOTES

677,003 38,119

834,259 42,110

761,022 19,159

1,449,426 32,288

1,037,564 34,325

2,128,821 43,626

1,617,482 32,719

473,796 17,971

460,599 12,845

1,020,338 19,437

440,080 21,321

813,671 31,012

636,018 25,192

Data source:

INEC

881,352 47,254 982,388

18,30

4

642,615 20,758

533,172 26,441

421,328 17,959

500,451 22,334

1,443,686 52,289

561,056 21,379

702,964 28,957

1,267,773 17,075

511,547 10,094

683,264 19,867

579,677 23,039

306,805 9,210

573,173 12,459

450,514 15,392

688,584 14,825

391,045 10,004

367,067 4,672

1,565,461 `19,307

1,017,064 11,487

Developed by INEC-ERM Team 31 th March 2015

ERM RISK MAP

PERCENTAGE REJECTED

VOTES:

MARCH 28, 2015

PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTIONS

National Total Rejected

Ballots: 844,519

National Percentage Rejected

Ballots: 2.87%

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 2 April

Data source: INEC

Note: Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number

Legend

%#

% rejected votes

Below 3%

3-4%

5% and above

ELECTIONS CANCELLED:ANKA,BIRNIN

MAGAJI,BUKKUYUM,GUSAU,KAURA,

NAMODA,MARADUN,MARU,ZURMI

PUS INVOLVED:31

VOTES AFFECTED: 13,965

ELECTIONS AFFECTED: IGABI, KACHIA,

KAGARKO, KUDAN, SABON

GARI,SANGA,SOBA,ZANGON KATAF

PUS INVOLVED:38

VOTES AFFECTED:27,482

ELECTIONS AFFECTED: BWARI, MUNICIPAL

PUS INVOLVED: 3

VOTES AFFECTED: 7,266

AFFECTED: AKWANGA,AWE,DOMA,

KARU,KEANA,KEFFI,KOKONA,LAFIA,

NASARAWA,NASARAWA EGGON,OBI,TOTO,

WAMBA

PU AFFECTED: 32

TOTAL: 79,386

ELECTIONS CANCELLED: SAKI WEST, AFIJIO,

IBADAN NORTH

PUS INVOLVED:4

VOTES AFFECTED:1850

ELECTIONS CANCELLED:AKOKO EDO,ETSAKO

EAST,ETSAKO

WEST,IGUEBEN,IKPOBA:OKHA,OREDO,

ORHIONMON

PUS INVOLVED:275

VOTES AFFECTED:148,980

ELECTIONS

AFFECTED:AKKO,BALANGA,BILLIRI,DUKKU,FUN

AKAYE,GOMBE,KALTUNGO,NAFADA,

YALMALTU/DEBA

PUS INVOLVED: 73

VOTES AFFECTED:32,511

ERM RISK MAP ON

CANCELLED ELECTIONS IN

POLLING

UNITS

ELECTIONS CANCELLED:AKOKO EDO,ETSAKO

EAST,ETSAKO

WEST,IGUEBEN,IKPOBA:OKHA,OREDO,

ORHIONMON

PUS INVOLVED:275

VOTES AFFECTED:148,980

CANCELLED:ALKALERI,BOGORO,DARAZO,

GAMAWA,ITAS/GADAU,KIRFI,MISAU,TAFAWA

BALEWA,TORO,WARJI

PUS:54

VOTES AFFECTED:27,947

ELECTIONS

AFFECTED:AKKO,BALANGA,BILLIRI,DUKKU,FUN

AKAYE,GOMBE,KALTUNGO,NAFADA,

YALMALTU/DEBA

PUS INVOLVED: 73

VOTES AFFECTED:32,511

ELECTIONS CANCELLED:DEMSA,FUFORE,GIREI,

MADAGALI,MAIHA,MUBI NORTH,NUMAN

PUS INVOLVED:37

VOTES AFFECTED: 18,114

ELECTIONS CANCELLED: ABAKALIKI, IKWO,

OHAOZARA, ONICHA

PUS INVOLVED: 38

VOTES AFFECTED: 23,551

ELECTIONS AFFECTED: ISU (UMUNDUGBA),

OWERRI NORTH, AHIAZU MBAISE, EZINIHITE

MBAISE

PUS INVOLVED: 54

VOTES AFFECTED: 30,353

Mapped by INEC-ERM Team 31 th March 2015

Data source:

INEC

ERM RISK MAP

NUMBER OF VOTES

AFFECTED BY

CANCELLATIONS:

MARCH 28, 2015

PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTIONS

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 2 April

Data source: INEC

Note: States without values recorded no cancellations

National Total: 689,498

Legend: votes affected by cancellation

# Number of votes affected

Less than 1,000 votes

1,001 – 5,000 votes

5,001 – 10,000 votes

10,001 – 25,000 votes

25,001 – 50,000 votes

50,001 – 100,000 votes

Over 100,000 votes

ERM RISK MAP

NUMBER OF VOTERS

ACCREDITED THAT DID

NOT VOTE:

MARCH 28, 2015

PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTIONS

National Total:2,314,407

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 2 April

Data source: INEC

Legend: voters who were accredited but did not vote

N Number of voters

Less than 1,000 voters

25,001 – 50,000 voters

50,001 – 100,000 voters

Over 100,000 voters

ERM RISK MAP

ELECTION RESULTS

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 3 April

Data source: INEC

States won by APC

States won by PDP

ERM RISK MAP

ELECTION RESULTS –

MARGIN OF VOTES

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 3 April

Data source: INEC

Legend

States won by APC (over 65% of the vote)

States won by APC (56-65% of the vote)

States won by APC (55% or less of the vote)

States won by PDP (55% or less of the vote)

States won by PDP (56-65% of the vote)

States won by PDP (over 65% of the vote)

Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 3 April

ERM RISK MAP

ELECTION RESULTS –

MARGIN OF VOTES

Data source: INEC

Note: All percentages have been rounded to nearest whole number

Note: In States that do not display % vote obtained by other parties this means those parties obtained less thatn 1% combined

Legend

% % vote obtained by APC

% % vote obtained by PDP

% % vote obtained by all other parties

States won by APC (over 65% of the vote)

States won by APC (56-65% of the vote)

States won by APC (55% or less of the vote)

States won by PDP (55% or less of the vote)

States won by PDP (56-65% of the vote)

States won by PDP (over 65% of the vote)

ANALYSIS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Analysis and Recommendations

Availability of election material

Overall, election material was available in sufficient quantities throughout the country although there were some States such as Abia, Adamawa, Kano and Sokoto that reported systematic shortages. In addition to this, there were widespread isolated reports of shortages of the following material: ballot papers, results sheets and incident forms. While these were not systematic they may have had an impact on the conduct of the vote. In addition to this, all observer reports – both domestic and international – noted that INEC officials and/or material arrived late and contributed to the late opening of polling units throughout the country. This trend created bottlenecks and resulted in the late start of accreditation, voting, counting and possibly contributed to the high number of persons who were accredited, but did not vote (2,314,407 persons). The following recommendations are aimed at the logistics department at all levels:

• Ensure all election material is available in sufficient quantity by Wednesday 8 March at the latest to allow sufficient time for INEC to make up any shortfalls.

• Develop checklists to enable INEC staff to verify the availability of election material at each stage of the logistics chain.

• Ensure transport plans are in place to deliver election material in time for their deployment to polling units.

• Ensurethat RAC centers are properly put into use and that RAC supervisors are adequately prepared to coordinate the distribution of election material in time for poll opening.

Presence of security personnel

Overall, there were very few reports of polling units without security personnel and a similar plan should be employed for the governorship elections. Despite this, there were incidents of election related violence and theft of election material (see below). The following recommendations are aimed at the ICCES:

• Ensure that security personnel are reinforced in States that recorded incidents of election-related violence (see below).

• Increase the presence of security personnel in States that are high risk ahead of the governorship elections.

• Ensure security personnel remain deployed in populous areas during the collation period and after the announcement of election results.

Card Readers

Despite a few high-profile incidents, overall there were very few reports of verification failure across the country. There were however delays created by poor configuration of card readers, the non-activation of SIM cards, and the non-availability of card readers at the start of accreditation. In addition to this, there were widespread reports of card reader authentication failures . While some incidents of authentication failure may be related to data capture during voter registration, other problems may have been related to the lack of capacity of the users. The following recommendations are for the governorship elections and are mostly directed at the ICT department at national and State level:

• Ensure all card readers are properly configured and contain activated SIM cards through testing each card reader before deployment.

• Recharge batteries ahead of the governorship elections.

• Ensure functional card readers are available in sufficient quantities.

• Prepare a short flyer for poll workers with basic instructions on the use of the card readers with basic troubleshooting tips for common issues that can be easily resolved, tips could include when and how to use the incident form.

• Ensure poll workers are aware of the purpose of incident forms and that the forms are available in sufficient quantities to avoid long delays.

• If possible, provide additional training to poll workers on the use of card readers.

Election-related violence

Overall, the March 28 elections were peaceful, particularly when put into the context of Nigeria’s security challenges due to the insurgency and its history of violent elections. However, there were a number (96) of high profile incidents, alongside other (more widespread) reports of intimidation of

INEC ad hoc staff. In some areas, these incidents led to the cancellation of elections. The following recommendations are aimed at improving security and are directed at INEC and security agencies:

• Reinforce the presence of security personnel in places that experienced cancellations due to violence and other areas that experienced violence.

• Ensure security after election-day at collation centres and populous areas including after the announcement of election results.

• Prosecute those responsible for election-related violence during the March 28 elections.

Theft/destruction of election material

Overall, most of the reports of theft and/or destruction of election material appear to have been isolated incidents. However there are signs that some INEC ad hoc staff were implicated in things like the theft of results forms. In view of the upcoming elections, it is recommended that:

• INEC ad hoc staff are reminded of their roles and responsibilities as well possible sanctions for electoral offences.

• Identify any INEC personnel involved in any incidents during the March 28 elections and ensure they are (i) blacklisted from the INEC database, and (ii) prosecuted for their alleged offences..

Rejected votes

Overall there were 844,519 rejected votes during the March 28 election. While this figure is not high compared to other elections in Nigeria and around the world, certain areas recorded a higher percentage of rejected votes – these include: Enugu, Kebbi, Kwara, Ogun, Oyo and Sokoto.

• Reinforce voter education, particularly in the above mentioned States to ensure voters are aware of how to mark their ballots properly.

Cancelled elections

During the March 28 elections, cancellations affected just over 1,000 polling units representing over 600,000 votes. The most affected States were Benue, Delta,

Edo and Nasarawa (over 50,000 votes affected) and to a lesser extent Bauchi, Gombe, Kaduna and Niger (over 25,000 votes affected). The reasons for the cancellations are not known but are broadly related to the absence of material and/or personnel; security; lack of poll worker capacity to correctly complete forms; and election fraud. Ahead of the April 11 election, INEC should:

• Identify the reasons for cancellations and where appropriate, put in place measures to ensure this is not repeated.

• In cases where logistical arrangements led to cancellation, ensure plans are in place so that elections hold.

Difference between accredited voters and votes cast

A very high number of persons who were accredited did not end up casting their vote (2,314,407 potential voters). This issue was widespread, but Kano, Lagos, Oyo and Sokoto were particularly affected. Two of these States are the most populous in in the country and Lagos recorded and this may have been due to impatience due to slow accreditation and/or the late start of accreditation. INEC should:

• Rectify logistical issues that may have contributed to slow accreditation and voting.

• Remind poll workers to manage queues effectively and use incident forms after 2 authentication failures (rather that attempting multiple times) to speed up the process.

Download