Penny Trade Secrets

advertisement
American Intellectual Property Law Association
TRADE SECRET LAW IN THE U.S.
AIPPI JAPAN
April 10, 2013
Firm Logo
John (Jack) J. Penny
Nutter, McClennen & Fish LLP
AIPLA
1
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
Applicable Law
•
•
Statutory Basis
̶
I. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) enacted by 46 of the 50
states (all states except CA, NY, MA, TX) – sought to alleviate the
differences between the states by creating a uniform trade secrete
law
̶
II. Economic Espionage Act of 1996
̶
III. Theft of Trade Secret Clarification Act 2012
̶
IV. Foreign and Economic Espionage Penalty Enhancement Act of
2012
Common Law
Firm
Logo
̶
State
Common Law, e.g. CA, NY, MA
̶
AIPLA
2
Uniform Federal Common Law in the ITC
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
What Is A Trade Secret?
• Any information that:
̶ is secret;
̶ has commercial value derived from the fact that it is
secret; and
̶ is the subject of reasonable efforts to be kept secret.
UTSA
Firm Logo
AIPLA
3
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
Definition Of Misappropriation (UTSA)
• Misappropriation means;
Improper acquisition
-orImproper use
-orImproper disclosure
Firm Logo
AIPLA
4
of a trade secret
(must know or have
reason to know it is
a trade secret)
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
Available Remedies
• Civil remedies
— UTSA (CA): Injunction and damages (actual loss,
reasonable royalty, or punitive) provided by statute
— Non-UTSA (NY): Variety of remedies including
constructive trust
• Criminal law protection
— Fines and imprisonment under Federal Law
Logo
— Firm
UTSA
(CA): Available
AIPLA
5
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine (from 1995 PepsiCo case)
• A person may be prevented from working for another
company if the person’s job duties (at the new company)
would inevitably cause the person to rely upon former
employer’s trade secrets
• Generally requires a showing that:
— Person knows former employer’s trade secrets;
— Departing employee’s new job at competitor is so similar
to those in former job that it would be extremely difficult for
him to avoid using former employer’s trade secrets; and
— Firm
Departing
Logo employee and new employer cannot be
depended upon to avoid using former employer’s trade
secrets.
AIPLA
6
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
Why Use Trade Secrets?
• To protect non-patentable subject matter (e.g.,
non-technical info., non-patentable info., etc.)
• To avoid risk of patent becoming invalid (which
amounts to disclosure without benefit)
• More than a year beyond patenting window
(situation is different outside U.S.)
Firm Logo
• Extended protection (no finite term as in patents)
AIPLA
7
Overview of Trade Secret Protection
When Are Trade Secrets At Greatest Risk?
• Departing employees
• Failed business dealings
• Corporate espionage
Most breaches are caused by insiders (at company),
often lower level employees, through carelessness,
lack ofFirm
training,
or greed.
Logo
AIPLA
8
DuPont v. Kolon (E.D. VA 2011)
• DuPont sued Kolon Industries for “theft of trade
secrets and confidential information” re. production
and marketing of Kevlar (high strength synthetic
fiber)
• Jury awarded DuPont damages of $919 million
• Departing employee (Michael Mitchell) retained
confidential information and illegally gave to Kolon
• Mitchell pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 18
Firm Logo
months in prison
AIPLA
9
Trade Secret Protection In The ITC
Tian Rui Group Co. Ltd. v. U.S. Int’l Trade
Comm’n, 2010-1395 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
• Confirmed that § 337 applies to trade
secret misappropriation even where unfair
act occurs exclusively overseas.
Firm Logo
AIPLA
10
Trade Secret Protection In The ITC (cont’d)
In The ITC Complainant Must Prove:
• One or more trade secrets exist and are not within
public domain;
• Complainant is owner of the trade secret or has
proprietary interest in it;
• The complainant disclosed the trade secret to the
respondent while in a confidential relationship or the
respondent wrongfully obtained the trade secret by
unfair means; and
• The respondent used or disclosed the trade secret
Firm Logo
causing
injury to the complainant.
AIPLA
11
II. Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996
- 18 U.S.C. § 1831-1839
Criminalizes Theft Or Misappropriation Of Trade Secrets:
• To benefit a foreign government, instrumentality
or agent
§ 1831
• Related to or included in a product that is produced
for or placed in interstate or foreign commerce to the
economic benefit of anyone other than the owner and
with the intent to cause injury
§ 1831
• Knowing possession, receipt or purchase of stolen or
misappropriated trade secrets falling into either 1
or 2 above
§ 1831 and 1832
• Attempting
Firm Logoor conspiring with others to commit 1, 2
or 3 above
§ 1831 and 1832
AIPLA
12
Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996
- 18 U.S.C. § 1831-1839 (cont’d)
Remedies For EEA Violations:
• Although there is no private right of action under
EEA, the government may obtain injunctive relief to
prevent further disclosure of a trade secret by the
defendant or third parties.
• Fines up to $10,000,000 for organizations and
$500,000 for individuals.
• Imprisonment up to 15 years for individuals.
Firm Logo
AIPLA
13
United States v. Aleynikov, 676 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2012)
Court Of Appeals Reversed Lower Court Conviction
Holding:
• §1832 of EEA – Theft of Trade Secrets – applies to “a
trade secret, that is related to or included in a product
that is produced for or placed in interstate or foreign
commerce. . .”
• “Goldman’s HFT system was neither ‘produced for’ nor
‘placed in interstate or foreign commerce’ – Goldman
had no intention of selling its HFT system or licensing it
toFirm
anyone.”
Logo
AIPLA
14
III. Theft Of Trade Secrets Clarification Act
Expanded EEA In Two Major Ways:
• Expands the scope to include services as well as
products.
• Expands the scope of trade secrets covered by §
1832 from those trade secrets “included in a
product which is produced for or placed in”
interstate or foreign commerce to “a product or
service used in or intended for use in” interstate or
foreign commerce.
Firm Logo
AIPLA
15
IV. Foreign and Economic Espionage Penalty
Enhancement Act of 2012 (H.R. 6029)
• Amends the federal criminal code to increase the
maximum fine for economic espionage, became law
Jan. 14, 2013,
• Individuals found guilty of economic espionage can
be fined up to $5,000,000.
• Organizations found guilty of economic espionage
can be fined up to $10,000,000 or three times the
value of the stolen trade secret to the guilty
organization including expenses for research,
design
and other costs of reproducing the secret
Firm Logo
that the guilty organization was thereby awarded.
AIPLA
16
Internal Trade Secret Program
Internal Trade Secret Procedures
• A. Employment Practices
• B. Confidentiality Program and Records
Management
• C. Monitoring and Auditing
Logo
• D.Firm
Response
procedures
AIPLA
17
Internal Trade Secret Program (cont’d)
A. Employment Practices
• Require all employees to sign confidentiality
agreements:
— Acknowledging ownership of confidential
information
— Specifying obligations during and after employment
— Addressing IP assignment issues
Firm Logo
AIPLA
18
Internal Trade Secret Program (cont’d)
B. Confidentiality Program And Records Management
• Identify and update secrets to be protected
• Train employees and consultants on record-keeping
• Limit Access
— Meaningful difference between confidential and non-confidential
information
• Physical Security
— Restrict access to information and certain physical areas
— Need to know basis
— Firm
Security
Logomeasures including locks, keys, shredding,
dumpsters
AIPLA
19
Internal Trade Secret Program (cont’d)
Coca Cola’s Famous Secret Recipe
• Perhaps the most famous trade secret is the secret recipe for cocacola (Coke)
• Invented by John S. Pemberton on 1886, only shared with a small
group and not written down
• 1919 Ernest Woodruff purchased the Coca-Cola Company, and
deposited the secret formula (on paper) in a bank vault in N.Y. as
collateral for the loan
• When the loan was paid off in 1925. Woodruff moved the formula to
SunTrust Bank in Atlanta
• In Firm
2011,Logo
formula was moved to a vault at a public, interactive
exhibit at the World of Coca-Cola in Atlanta
AIPLA
20
Internal Trade Secret Program (cont’d)
C. Monitoring And Auditing
• Monitoring compliance
• Exit interview and related procedures
— Return/seizure of all company property at
termination, including electronic copies of
materials
Firm Logo
AIPLA
21
Internal Trade Secret Program (cont’d)
D. Response Procedures
• Response procedures when suspecting a departing
employee taking confidential with him?
— What to do immediately?
• e.g., secure computer and other storage devices, access
to email/network
• e.g., suspend record destruction
• Response procedures when a security breach caused by
potential espionage is discovered?
— Firm
Should
Logoone get law enforcement involved?
AIPLA
22
External Business Relationships:
Collaboration Agreements
Key Considerations
• Any disclosure of proprietary information must be
protected by written agreements
• Must clearly define the scope of what is confidential
• Must clearly define the purpose of the disclosure to
the collaboration partner
• Must clearly define the use that can be made with
that
information (including further disclosure)
Firm Logo
AIPLA
23
External Business Relationships:
Collaboration Agreements (cont’d)
Exploratory Discussions: NDAs And Feasibility Studies
• Narrow Disclosure – disclose only what is needed to achieve
purpose
— Disclosure may not lead to deal and potential partner is
likely also considering competitors
— NDA is critical not only for protecting trade secrets, but
preserving patent rights
— Keep most valuable (and enabling) information to yourself
— Example: results, but no methods, no formulas,
compositions,
etc.
Firm
Logo
AIPLA
24
External Business Relationships:
Collaboration Agreements (cont’d)
Exploratory Discussions: NDAs And Feasibility Studies
(cont’d)
• Limit Right to Use and Disclose
— To evaluate technology for purpose of business of
business relationship
— Limit sharing of information within each company
— Require return of any documents/presentation
handouts
• Don’t progress to the next stage without a new
agreement
Firm Logo
AIPLA
25
External Business Relationships:
Collaboration Agreements (cont’d)
Joint Work (cont’d)
• Clearly define scope of disclosures
— Limit disclosures to “need to know”; use point persons for
party interface
— Train your project team in what you consider proprietary
and in what can and cannot be shared
— Require written consent before any third party disclosures
• Clearly define scope of use of confidential information
— Define purpose of agreement
— Firm
Define
each party’s rights and responsibilities
Logo
AIPLA
26
External Business Relationships:
Collaboration Agreements (cont’d)
Joint Work (cont’d)
•
Build a record
— Clearly identify and document all exchanges of Confidential
Information
— Keep written records of all internal work under the JDA.
— Keep written records of all oral exchanges of information (including informal
calls) and of all documents exchanged
•
Clearly define IP rights (including trade secrets and know-how)
— Background IP rights
— Joint discoveries and collaboration IP
— Separate discoveries during collaboration term
Logo
— Firm
Require
cooperation in patenting to avoid harm to respective
patent portfolios
AIPLA
27
External Business Relationships:
Collaboration Agreements (cont’d)
Joint Work (cont’d)
• Be Vigilant
— Monitor publications and presentations made by
collaborator
— Monitor patent filings
— Periodically exercise audit or inspection rights
— Track inventory and use of confidential information
Firm Logo
AIPLA
28
Thank you for your attention. Questions?
John (Jack) J. Penny
Nutter, McClennen & Fish LLP
155 Seaport Blvd.
Boston, MA, 022110
1-617-439-2566
jpenny@nutter.com
John (Jack) J. Penny
Firm Logo
AIPLA
29
* Special thanks to Joe Calvaruso
for providing many of the slides on
which this presentation is based
Download