Chapter 2: Protecting the Ozone Layer 1. 2. 3. 4. Catatan: Diambil dari berbagai sumber Why do we need to do to protect the ozone layer? Isn’t ozone hazardous to human health? Why is the ozone layer getting smaller? What can we do (if anything) to help stop the depletion of our ozone layer? Ozone Formation Energy + 3 O2 2 O3 Energy must be absorbed (endothermic) for this reaction to occur. Ozone is an allotropic form of oxygen. The name ozone comes from a Greek word meaning “to smell” An allotrope is two or more forms of the same element that differ in their chemical structure and therefore their properties. Element oxygen carbon Allotropes O2, O3 graphite, diamond, buckminister fullerenes 2.1 Mass number (A) 16.00 O 8 -The sum of the protons and neutrons. Atomic number (Z) -The number of protons. (nuclear charge) 2.2 2.2 The electrons in the outermost energy levels are called valence electrons. The group number (of the representative elements) on the periodic table tells you the number of valence electrons. Group 1A: 1 valence electron 1A 8A Group 3A: 3 valence electrons 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 2.2 Isotopes are two or more forms of the same element (same number of protons) whose atoms differ in number of neutrons, and hence in mass. Isotopes of carbon: • Carbon 14 ( 6C) – Used in dating old materials C-12, C-13, C-14 – Atomic number: 6 also written as: 12C 13C 14C – Atomic mass: 14 – # of neutrons = Atomic massAtomic # – 6 protons, 6 electrons, 8 neutrons *The average mass is very close to 12.000 b/c 6C is by far the most abundant isotope. 2.2 Representing molecules with Lewis structures: Consider water, H2O: H O H 1. Find sum of valence electrons: 1 O atom x 6 valence electrons per atom = 6 + 2 H atoms x 1 valence electron per atom = +2 8 valence electrons 2. Arrange the electrons in pairs; use whatever electron pairs needed to connect the atoms, then distribute the remaining electron pairs so that the octet rule is satisfied: lone pair O H H bonding pair 2.3 Representing molecules with Lewis structures: Typical valence for selected atoms = the # of bonds an atom typically forms Element Typical valence 1 Classification O 2 divalent N 3 trivalent C 4 tetravalent H, X (X= F, Cl, Br, I) monovalent 2.3 Representing molecules with Lewis structures: Multiple bonds O H O Double bond C C H Triple bond Occasionally a single Lewis structure does not adequately represent the true structure of a molecule, so we use resonance forms: O O O O N N N O O O O O 2.3 The Nature of Light Low E High E Wavelength (l) = distance traveled between successive peaks (nm). Frequency (n) = number of waves passing a fixed point in one second (waves/s or 1/s or s-1 or Hz). 2.4 The Electromagnetic Spectrum The various types of radiation seem different to our senses, yet they differ only in their respective l and n. 2.4 Visible: l = 700 - 400 nm M MUDAS I R Decreasing wavelength Infrared (IR) : longest of the visible spectrum, heat ray absorptions cause molecules to bend and stretch. Microwaves: cause molecules to rotate. Short l range: includes UV (ultraviolet), X-rays, and gamma rays. 2.4 The wavelength and frequency of electromagnetic radiation are related by: c = ln where c = 3 x 108 m/s (the speed of light) The energy of a photon of electromagnetic radiation is calculated by: E = h n where h = 6.63 x 10-34 J.s (Plank’s constant) Energy and frequency are directly relatedhigher frequency means higher energy. 2.5 What is the energy associated with a photon of light with a wavelength of 240 nm? C = ln E=hn n =C l E = (6.63 x 10-34 J.s) (1.3 x 1015 s-1) E = 8.6 x 10-19 J n = 3 x 108 m/s -9 m = 1.3 x 1015 s-1 10 240 nm x nm UV radiation has sufficient energy to cause molecular bonds to break 2.5 2.6 The Chapman Cycle l≤ l≤ A steady state condition 2.6 Factors influencing steady-state concentration of O3 • Intensity of UV radiation – Expect O3 concentration will depend on season and sun cycle • Concentration of O2 and other reacting species • Temperature • Reaction rates (some of the steps are faster than others) • *Many of these factors depend on altitude, so O3 concentrations also depend on altitude. Biological Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation The consequences depend primarily on: 1. The energy associated with the radiation. 2. The length of time of the exposure. 3. The sensitivity of the organism to that radiation. The most deadly form of skin cancer, melanoma, is linked with the intensity of UV radiation and the latitude at which you live. As l decreases, damage to DNA increases. Note the logarithmic scale on the y-axis. An Australian product uses “smart bottle” technology; bottle color changes from white to blue when exposed to UV light. 2.7 O3 concentrations vs. altitude O3 concentrations over time http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/cgibin/texis/webinator/printall?/Library/Ozone/ozone_2.html 1 Dobson unit (DU) = 1 O3 molecule per 1 billion (109) molecules of air 320 Du is average ozone level over the northern hemisphere 250 DU is typical at the equator “hole” is the area over Antarctica with < 220 DU Natural causes of O3 destruction 1) Reactions with water vapor and its breakdown products: H2O + UV photon H• + •OH These free radical products can participate in reactions that convert O3 to O2: O3 + H• O2 + •OH O3 + •OH 2O2 + H• Free radicals very reactive b/c they have unpaired eOctet Rule is NOT satisfied Example of a chain reaction. Free radicals are very destructive • 2) Reactions with stratospheric nitrogen monoxide (NO) Formation of natural NO: N2O + O 2NO – N2O produced by microorganisms • Formation of man-made NO: N2 + O2 + energy NO – Energy is from lightning or hightemp engines of supersonic transport airplanes (like the Concorde) that are designed to fly at altitudes of 15-20 km (the region of the ozone layer) • Lewis dot structure of NO? • Turns out that NO is also a free radical… • However, these natural causes do not explain the amount of ozone destruction seen in recent years… energy Source of VOC and NO in the Upper Atmosphere leading to Tropospheric Air Pollution Chemistry CFCs seem to be the culprit Properties and uses of CFC • • Stable • Nontoxic • • Nonflammable • Low boiling point (makes it a good refrigerant) • Cheap • Widely available Originally developed as refrigerants to replace the toxic ones that had previously been used (SO2 and ammonia—NH3) Also used as: – Solvent for computer chips – Propellants for aerosol cans – Styrofoam – Fire extinguishers Before we knew about the ozone hole… • Two scientists, Roland & Molina, set out to study fate of atmospheric CFC molecules • The reactions they hypothesized would occur suggested that CFCs could destroy significant amounts of O3 – The destruction of O3 by CFCs later shown by scientific experiments. • ~ 5 years after release in troposphere, CFCs make their way into the stratosphere. • A high-energy photon corresponding to wavelengths 220 nm has enough energy to break the chlorine-carbon bond: CCl2F2 + photon •CClF2 + •Cl Revolutionized modern life! Throughout the 1960s and 70s, cheap air conditioning using CFCs helped spur the booming growth of Southern cities such as Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston. Reactions with •Cl •Cl +O3 O2 + •OCl •OCl + O •Cl + O2 O3 + O 2O2 You can see that once •Cl is created that it begins a chain reaction—it can destroy many (~ 100,000!) O3 molecules. •Cl is acting as a catalyst—it is not used up in the reaction The presence of •Cl will affect the Chapman cycle balance!!! Removal of •Cl • Carried to lower atmosphere by winds— once in lower atmosphere, there are many other compounds for •Cl to react with. • If it encounters another •Cl the following reaction may occur: •Cl + •Cl Cl2 • May react with other species to form stable compounds such as HCl and ClONO2 Proof of relationship b/w ozone depletion and stratospheric Cl • • • 75-85% is from human activity – CFCs – Rocket fuel from space shuttles (<1%) 15-20% is from methyl chloride – Most from natural sources and burning of biomass ~2% - Large, explosive volcanoes – Increase amount of HCl which can be converted to •Cl – Only a few volcanoes have enough explosive power to project material into the stratosphere. Why is the hole over Antarctica? • A special mechanism appears to be in effect here, related to the fact that the lower stratosphere over the South Pole is the coldest spot on Earth. – During the Antarctic winter (June to September), a strong circumpolar wind develops in the middle to lower atmosphere • keeps warmer new air (w/ new O3) from entering – Temps can get as low as -90oC! – At temps < 80oC, clouds of ice crystals containing sulfates and nitric acid can develop in the stratosphere. • In spring, when the sun comes out, chemical reactions occurring on the surface of these cloud particles convert otherwise safe (non-ozone depleting) molecules to more reactive species. – ClONO2 & HCl converted to HOCl & http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Tango/ Cl2 – HOCl •Cl + •OH ; Cl2 2 •Cl UV light UV light Summer conditions replenish hole • In summer, sunlight warms the atmosphere – Ice crystals evaporate summer • No ice crystals means the conversion of ClONO2 & HCl to more reactive species halts. – Air from lower latitudes flows into the polar regions, replenishing depleted ozone levels. – Thus, “Ozone Hole” is largely replenished by the end of summer. • Same process is developing in the Arctic spring The Global Response • CFCs in spray cans banned in North America in 1978, and use as foaming agents for plastics discontinued in 1990. • 1987 Montreal Protocol—established a schedule to reduce production & consumption of CFCs. • The US and 140 other countries agreed to a complete ban on CFC production after Dec. 31, 1995. • Other ozone depleting compounds to be eliminated b/w 2002-2010: •CFBr compounds (fire-fighting) •CCl4 (an industrial solvent) •CH3Br (agricultural fumigant) Global production of CFCs, 1950-2000 Black-market CFCs • While the protocols set dates for the halt of production, sale of existing stockpiles will remain legal. – US govt. is promoting conversion to less harmful substitute refrigerants by imposing a tax of $5.35/lb on CFCs • Price of CFCs has risen $1/lb in 1989 to $15/lb (as of 2003) • Creates a black-market for CFCs, which are 2nd only to illegal drugs as the most lucrative illegal import. • “Freon busts” in 1997 led to the confiscation of 12 million lbs of illegal CFCs Ban on CFCs is making a difference--slowly • Stratospheric concentration of chlorine peaked at 4.1 ppb in the mid-90s and is now declining. • However, the stratospheric chlorine is not expected to reach 2 ppb* until 2050 or 2075. • *Antarctic ozone hole first appeared when chlorine levels reached 2 ppb. What to use instead? • DON’T want to go back to previous technologies (NH3, SO2 as refrigerants)! • Need to balance 3 undesirable properties and come up with the best compromise – Toxicity – Flammability – Extreme Stability Fluorocarbons (FCs) • Made of only carbon and fluorine – Non-toxic – Nonflammable – Don’t decompose in the stratosphere • Why? The C-F bond is stronger—the energy requirement to break this bond is higher than that of a UV photon. • The negative: No destruction pathways—the molecules will accumulate in the atmosphere and contribute to the greenhouse effect by absorbing IR radiation. Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) • Replacing one or more of the halogen atoms with hydrogen makes the compound more reactive – Compounds decompose long before reaching stratosphere • However: – Too many H atoms increases flammability – Too many Cl atoms increases toxicity Suitable HCFCs Decompose in the troposphere more readily than CFCs • HCFC-22 is the most widely-used HCFC – Used in air-conditioners and in the production of foamed fast food containers – 5% ozone depleting potential of CFC-12 • HCFC-141b used to form foam insulation – 250 million lbs produced worldwide in 1996 for this purpose • Montreal Protocol calls for a production ban of HCFCs by 2030. CFC-12 Hydroflurocarbons (HFCs) H • Example: HFC-134a • Has no Cl atoms to interact with ozone • The 2 H atoms facilitate decomposition in the lower atmosphere, without making it flammable under normal conditions. C C H US Emissions http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/vr98rpt/chapter6.html Timeline • • • • • • • • • 1928 – CFCs invented 1950s-1970s – Consumption and use of CFCs rises rapidly 1971 – CFCs measured in the atmosphere 1974 – Rowland & Molina link CFCs with ozone depletion 1985 – First scientific assessment of stratospheric ozone levels 1987 – “Smoking gun” evidence linking decreasing ozone levels with increasing stratospheric chlorine levels – Montreal Protocol established a schedule to reduce production & consumption of CFCs. 1991 – Multinational fund established to provide financial and technical assistance to developing countries to enable them to comply with control measures. - B/w 1991 & 2004 $1.6 billion given to more than 100 countries 1995 – Production ban of CFCs in US and 140 other countries goes into effect – Rowland & Molina win Nobel Prize for their work 2030 – Production ban of HCFCs goes into effect