ratio-presentation-2013-revised

advertisement

FY 2013

…It was a very good year…BUT!

Account

Description

Operating Activities

Revenue

Tuition

College of Arts & Sciences

School of Nursing and Health Professions

School of Education

School of Professional Studies

Continuing Education

Total Tuition

UNAUDITED

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES

Year Ended June 30, 2013

6/30/13

FY 13

Budget 6/30/12

FY12

Budget

19,440,475.00 20,025,650.00 18,796,920.00 18,663,108.00

3,944,950.00

3,994,360.00

3,106,804.00

2,801,600.00

4,521,063.00

4,575,428.00

5,781,501.00

3,675,245.00

9,018,932.00

9,458,105.00

9,632,394.00

7,902,106.00

1,250,470.00

1,251,915.00

1,500,000.00

38,175,890.00 39,305,458.00 37,317,619.00 34,542,059.00

Financial Aid

Net Tuition

8,470,576.00

8,953,880.00

8,099,215.00

7,910,739.00

29,705,314.00 30,351,578.00 29,218,404.00 26,631,320.00

Fees

Gifts & Private Grants

Government Grants/Contracts

Auxiliary Enterprises

Trinity Center

Other

Student Rooms

Operating Interest Income

Other Revenues

Total Operating Revenue

557,935.00

886,512.00

199,256.00

552,750.00

800,000.00

156,138.00

459,601.00

906,480.00

265,802.00

424,938.00

900,000.00

334,113.00

546,098.00

570,750.00

556,630.00

610,000.00

1,769,273.00

2,005,494.00

1,924,138.00

1,928,400.00

1,105,316.00

1,227,620.00

1,217,128.00

1,246,033.00

607,748.00

225,000.00

384,355.00

225,000.00

290,815.00

245,000.00

346,589.00

222,000.00

35,668,267.00 36,134,330.00 35,279,127.00 32,521,804.00

Expenses

Instructional Expenses

Academic Support

Student Services

Facility Services

Institutional Support

Public Service

Interest Expense

Auxiliary

Trinity Center

Other

Total Operating Expenses

Net assets released from restriction

Net Operating Expenses

Net Operating Revenue

UNAUDITED

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES

Year Ended June 30, 2013

9,123,101.00

9,835,729.00

8,301,122.00

8,596,563.00

3,408,307.00

4,030,289.00

2,848,979.00

3,121,493.00

3,482,088.00

3,938,967.00

3,405,716.00

3,703,687.00

3,759,487.00

4,445,277.00

3,717,389.00

4,294,698.00

7,508,760.00

9,457,558.00

7,114,491.00

8,532,985.00

32,867.00

723,283.00

39,183.00

753,374.00

169,560.00

779,095.00

209,367.00

559,199.00

768,763.00

1,031,302.00

912,392.00

1,030,699.00

954,491.00

979,452.00

943,107.00

936,307.00

29,719,048.00 34,562,378.00 28,270,295.00 30,897,406.00

(1,172,629.00) (421,811.00) (873,970.00) (215,589.00)

28,546,419.00 34,140,567.00 27,396,325.00 30,681,817.00

7,121,848.00

1,993,763.00

7,882,802.00

1,839,987.00

UNAUDITED

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES

Year Ended June 30, 2013

Non-Operating

Other Gains & Losses

Internally Designated Gifts for Acad. Center

Non-operating investment return

Internally Designated Gifts

Accretion Expense

Depreciation Expense

510,957.00

268,577.00

(506,682.00)

0.00

(608,021.00)

0.00

467,903.00

0.00

86,943.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

(51,432.00)

0.00

(53,350.00)

0.00

(50,858.00)

0.00

(50,858.00)

(1,017,313.00) (1,080,000.00) (1,040,211.00) (1,000,000.00)

Net Income 6,325,955.00

860,413.00

6,738,558.00

789,129.00

MOODY’S NOT-FOR-PROFIT PRIVATE

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

OUTLOOK

Three major trends across the spectrum in current financial environment:

1.

2.

3.

Muted Net Tuition Revenue Growth

Flat to Declining Enrollment Growth

Difficulty controlling expenses for multiple years

Moody’s Suggested Actions to Counter

Current Environment

Ensure Operating Margins

Maintain elevated levels of liquidity

Reduce debt structure risk and limit use of debt

WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN?

The Good News

Financial Ratios are moving in line with the benchmarks.

Cost containment and improved accounts receivable balances led to improvement in the Operating Performance Ratios.

Debt Ratios continue to be in line with benchmarks.

Trinity exceeded the Debt Covenant Ratios.

Managerial Financial Imperatives

Continued growth in enrollment

Continued vigilance over costs

Continued emphasis on cash and liquidity availability

Continued emphasis on receivables management

Continued need to improve endowment

Continued focus on strong balance sheet

• Cushion Ratio measures the ability to make debt payments with available cash and investments.

Cushion Ratio should be > 1.

Bond Covenants require 4.0.

• Actual Debt Service Coverage Ratio measures the actual coverage of debt payments by annual operations.

Actual Debt Service Coverage should be > 1.0

• Bond Covenants call for 1:1 minimum

• Annual Operating Margin measures the extent to which current-year internally generated resources have contributed to the overall financing of the institution’s operations.

The Annual Operating Margin should be positive and have an improving trend.

• Debt Service to Operations indicates how much of an institution’s operating expenses are used for making debt service payments.

This ratio should be low.

• Direct Debt to Total Capitalization measures the portion of the balance sheet covered by debt.

• This ratio should be lower than the median established.

• Viability Ratio measures the availability of expendable net assets to cover debt should the institution need to settle its obligations as of the balance sheet date.

A ratio of 1.0 or > indicates that an institution has enough expendable net assets to cover its debt obligations.

Return on Net Assets measures the change in net assets that occurred as a result of the operations of the institution.

The Return on Net Assets should be positive and have an improving trend.

 Measures the number of days an institution is able to cover its cash operating expenses from Annual Liquidity

Annual liquidity times 365 divided by total expenses less depreciation less additional, unusually large non-cash expenses

 Measures an institution’s ability to repay its demand debt from its Annual Liquidity

Annual Liquidity divided by demand debt

 Estimates institutional deferred maintenance as well as the operating efficiency of the existing plant facilities

Accumulated Depreciation divided by Depreciation Expense

 Measures the annual investment in capital facilities compared to annual depreciation expense

 Purchases of property, plant and equipment (from statement of cash flows) divided by depreciation expense

TRINITY ACADEMIC CENTER

Financing Plan for the

New Academic Center

September 2013

21

Topics for Discussion

Q & A

Q. How much do we need?

A. Project modeling and debt capacity analysis results

Q. Where are we going to get it?

A. Sources of funding for the project

How much do we need?

Current estimate is a maximum $40M project cost for a 75-80K square foot building.

This estimate includes ALL costs – hard and soft costs; furniture, fixtures, equipment (FF&E); a contingency fund and capitalized interest.

Where are we going to get it?

Total Cost = $40M

Trinity Cash $10M

Cap. Campaign $15M

External Funds $15M

Funds accumulated from excess cash for the last 4 fiscal years

Qualified pledges in hand of $15M as of Sept. 15, 2013

New debt to be secured via RFP process

Can Trinity assume $15M more debt?

We engaged Public Financial Management (PFM) to serve as our Financial Advisor for the project.

Step 1 involved the assessment of Trinity debt capacity. A 5-year pro-forma analysis indicated that Trinity could borrow $15M in debt in addition to current bond debt of $15.7M.

Would the $15M come from the public markets or a direct purchase bond with a lending institution?

Based on the following factors, we decided to issue an RFP for a tax-exempt direct purchase bond financing rather than public market bond debt on Trinity’s credit rating:

Costs to secure funds are lower for direct purchase

No public market “red tape” and disclosure to deal with

No need for or cost of a public rating from a ratings agency

Direct purchase market is very competitive in DC resulting in favorable rates and terms

Provides more flexibility in managing debt and interest rate protection

Which lending institutions are in the market for this kind of transaction?

The strategy is to “cast a wide net” and there are currently 17 banks on the list to receive the RFP.

(A list of the banks was sent to you along with the

RFP.)

The RFP Goals

The goals of the RFP are to:

Select a financing partner

Secure the most cost-effective funds with the least onerous “T’s and C’s”.

Provide flexibility and options for Trinity.

RFP – Issues to Consider

Current outstanding Series 2001 Bonds - $15.7M

Existing Letter of Credit (issued by Wells Fargo) enhancing the series 2001 Bonds with maturity date of April 2014.

Existing interest rate swap on the variable rate

Series 2001 Bonds is currently out of the money, estimated mark-to-market of $1.4M

RFP – What are we asking for?

Bank non-qualified tax-exempt direct purchase a bond of up to $31.7M to finance in part the construction of the new Academic Center and the possible refinancing of the Series 2001 Bonds on a non-taxable basis

Taxable proposals for construction to permanent financing of the Center both facilities with terms of up to 15 years

Variable rate and fixed rate proposals for the

$31.7M

A substitute Letter of Credit for the existing Series

2001 Bond

Swap(s) solution

Financing Plan Timetable

Key Dates:

Sept. 27 Board Approval of RFP

Oct. 7 RFP distributed

Oct. 28 Proposals due; Select Bank

Nov. 4 Negotiate Term Sheet

Submit DC Application

Nov. 8 Board approval of financing

Nov.-Feb. Term sheet, bond documents review

Mar. 10 Deal Close

We are seeking Board approval to proceed with the issuance of the RFP

Discussion on the recommendation to issue the RFP as presented to and approved by the Finance

Committee.

Motion: “The Board of Trustees approves issuance of the RFP to secure external funding for the new

Academic Center.”

Vote on the Motion

Download