First Amendment Freedoms Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment Freedoms 1. The framers of the U.S. Constitution had constraining the national government as one of their foremost aims. 2. A list of fundamental rights that the government may not infringe on were not included in the main body of the Constitution. 3. Popular protest over the absence of this list of human rights led to the agreement to add the Bill of Rights. 4. Understanding of these civil liberties, these fundamental First Amendment rights, and the existence of a free society are paramount. 5. The Bill of Rights technically applied only to the national government. 6. The Fourteenth Amendment and interpretation of the due process clause led to the nationalization of the Bill of Rights through “selective incorporation.” Rights in the Original Constitution 1. Habeas corpus 2. No bills of attainder 3. No ex post facto laws 4. No titles of nobility 5. Trial by jury in national courts 6. Protection for citizens as they move from one state to another, including the right to travel 7. Protection against using crime of treason to restrict other activities; limitation on punishment for treason 8. Guarantee that each state has a republican form of government 9. No religious test oaths as a condition of holding federal office 10.Protection against the impairment of contracts The Bill of Rights Debate over necessity at Constitutional Convention. Guarantees specific rights and liberties. Ninth Amendment states other rights exist. Tenth Amendment reserves rights to states and people. The Bill of Rights and the States •Civil liberties •Civil rights •Rights of persons accused of crimes •Political rights •Legal privileges •Common law •Civil law Teachers’ Lounge The Bill of Rights was ratified a. by State legislatures prior to the signing of the Constitution. b.at the same time as the Constitution in 1787. c. after the signing of the Constitution, in 1791. d.in the early nineteenth century. Incorporation Until 20th century, Bill of Rights did not apply to states. 14th Amendment’s due process clause raises questions. Begins to apply after Gitlow v. New York (1925). Case is first step in incorporation doctrine. Not all guarantees have been incorporated. Selective incorporation of fundamental freedoms. Selective Incorporation and the Application of the Bill of Rights to the States Right Amendment Year Public use and just compensation for the taking Of private property by the government. 5 1897 Freedom of speech 1 1925 Freedom of the press 1 1931 Fair trial 6 1932 Freedom of religion 1 1934 Freedom of assembly 1 1937 Free exercise of religion 1 1940 Separation of religion and government 1 1947 Right to a public trial 6 1948 Right against unreasonable searches and seizures 4 1949 Freedom of association 1 1958 Exclusionary rule 4 1961 Ban against cruel and unusual punishment 8 1962 Right to counsel in felony case 6 1963 Right against self-incrimination 5 1964 Right to confront witness 6 1965 1, 3, 4, 5, 9 1965 Right to an impartial jury 6 1966 Right to a speedy trial and compulsory process For obtaining witnesses 6 1967 Right to a jury trial in nonpetty cases 6 1968 Protection against double jeopardy 5 1969 Right of privacy Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and Association The most controversial freedom associated with expression is that of a. beliefs b. actions c. speech d. press Freedom of Speech is so essential • to a democratic political system; • for the intellectual enlightenment of a society and the human race; • for citizens to make intelligent judgments about candidates, political parties, and public policies; • for the discovery of the truth; • in a free society to trade in a “marketplace of ideas.” Speech takes several different forms • each subject to different levels of constitutional protection Forms of Speech Schenck v. United States Whitney v. California Gitlow v. New York Brandenburg v. Ohio Political Speech Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Campaign Virginia Citizens Consumer, Council, Inc. Speech Buckley v. Valeo McConnell v. Federal Election Commission Bates v. State Bar of Commercial Speech Arizona United States v. O’Brien Tinker v. Des Moines School Dist. Texas v. Johnson Symbolic Speech United States v. Eichman Schenck v. United States Advocates Docket: 437 Citation: 294 U.S. 47 (1919) Appellant: Charles Schenck Appellee: United States Abstract Oral Argument: January 9, 1919 Decision: March 3, 1919 Issues: Categories: first amendment, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, search and seizure Facts of the Case During World War I, Schenck mailed circulars to draftees. The circulars suggested that the draft was a monstrous wrong motivated by the capitalist system. The circulars urged “Do not submit to intimidation” but advised only peaceful action such as petitioning to repeal the Conscription Act. Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitment. Question Are Schenck’s actions (words, expression) protected by the free speech clause of the First Amendment? Conclusion In articulating the clear and present danger test to determine free speech cases, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for a unanimous Court, ruled that Schenck’s writings would be protected in ordinary times but “the character of every act depends upon circumstances in which it is done.” He compared writing such a pamphlet during wartime to falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater, starting that the context of a speech determines its permissibility. Only words that produce both a clear (obvious) and a present (immediate) danger are prohibited. Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and Association •Historical Constitutional Tests •The Clear and Present Danger Test •The Bad Tendency Test •The Preferred Position Doctrine Which of the following affects free speech? a. The Bad Tendency Test b. The Clear and Present Danger Test c. The Preferred Position Doctrine d. all of the above The Bad Tendency doctrine gives to ______ the power to decide what kinds of speech can be outlawed. a. courts b. legislatures c. the people d. chief executives The limits of free speech were set forth as the ______________ test by Justice Holmes in Schenck v. United States. a. The Bad Tendency Test b. The Clear and Present Danger Test c. The Preferred Position Doctrine d. Freedom of Information Act The Clear and Present Danger doctrine has been related to all of the following EXCEPT a. hate-speech codes at a university. b. insulting racial remarks in public. c. insulting sexual remarks in public. d. insults directed at candidates for public office. The doctrine that free speech cannot be restricted unless there is a close connection between a speech and illegal action is called a. the Clear and Present Danger test. b. the speech and dangerous result test. c. the speech and action test. d. absolutist doctrine. Nonprotected Speech These types of speech are without social value: •Libel - Written defamation of another person. Especially in the case of public officials and public figures, the constitutional tests designed to restrict libel actions are very rigid •Seditious libel - Defaming, criticizing, and New York Times v. Sullivan advocating the overthrow of the government •Obscenity and Pornography Miller v. California •Fighting Words - Words that by their very nature inflict injury on those to whom they are addressed or incite them to acts of violence •Commercial Speech - Advertisements and commercials for products and services; they receive less First Amendment protection, primarily to discourage false and misleading ads Nonprotected and Protected Speech Doctrines used to measure limits of governmental power to regulate speech • • • • Prior restraint Void for vagueness Least drastic means Content and viewpoint neutrality The current standards for obscenity are made a. by the Supreme Court b. at the state level c. at the community level d. by Congress Currently Supreme Court guidelines related to obscenity: a. assume that obscenity is protected by the U.S. Constitution b. allow for the application of community standards c. do little to allow for restriction of child pornography d. find it easy to separate the obscene from that which is not Persons may be convicted for one of the following a. possessing obscene materials b. selling obscene literature c. importing obscene literature from abroad d. writing obscene material All of the following are forms of non-protected speech except a. libel b. symbolic speech c. obscenity d. commercial speech Freedom of the Press •Does the Press Have the Right to Withhold Information? •Does the Press Have the Right to Know? •Free Press Versus Fair Trials Film censorship Gradually films have been protected Still can be censored by the government Media claims for special rights Reporter’s privilege Press Shield Laws In 2005, New York Times reporter Judith Miller was jailed for two months for refusing to disclose her sources to a grand jury Which of the following statements is true: a. The First Amendment prevents the FCC from refusing to renew a radio license if in its opinion a broadcaster has not served the public interest. b. The federal regulation of radio and television is based on the scarcity of broadcast channels available. c. Current federal laws protect commercial speech. d. Household censorship is unconstitutional. Which of the following is true? a. The mere fact that a statement is wrong or even defamatory is not sufficient to sustain a charge of libel. b. The Freedom of Information acts make most nonclassified records of federal agencies public. c. In a past decision the Supreme Court did not support barring of the press from a criminal case. d. All of the above. Other Media and Communications •The Mails •Handbills, Sound Trucks and Billboards A state cannot restrain the distribution of leaflets merely to keep its streets clean •Motion pictures and plays Constitutionally protected •Broadcast and Cable Communications Of all mass media, broadcasting receives the least First Amendment protection Regulated by the FCC •Telecommunications and the Internet