Extrusion of Polyethylene Jared Stradley CHEN 4903 December 4, 2006 Extruders Overview Project objectives Theory Experimental setup and procedures Results Conclusions and Recommendations References Wrap up Q&A Project objectives Characterize the flow of polyethylene in cylindrical die Estimate the maximum flow rate through a 1” diameter pipe die Theory Basically, it’s flow through a pipe or an annulus Theory cont. Major equations Pipe flow: r ( P1 P2 ) 2L dV dr ( P1 P2 ) R Q 8L 4 c More theory Annular flow: ( P1 P2 ) R Q 8L 4 1 4 1 ln 1 / 2 2 Experimental setup Experimental procedures Ran polyethylene at 155, 160 and 165 °C at 3, 5, 10 and 15 rpm Collected samples of each run Ran polypropylene at 200, 205 and 210 °C at 3, 5, 10 and 15 rpm Also collected samples Calculated Q, and dv/dr Results Shear Stress vs. Velocity Gradient for Polyethylene (pipe flow) 3.0E+06 155 °C 160 °C 165 °C τ (Pa) 2.5E+06 2.0E+06 1.5E+06 1.0E+06 5.0E+05 0.0E+00 0 2000 4000 6000 dv/dr (1/s) 8000 10000 12000 Results cont. Bingham plastic: dV o dr Results cont. Pressure drop (Pa) Pressure Drop vs. Velocity for Polyethylene (annulus) 3.00E+06 155 °C 2.50E+06 160 °C 2.00E+06 165 °C 1.50E+06 1.00E+06 5.00E+05 0.00E+00 0.000 5.000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000 Velocity (cm/s) 30.000 35.000 40.000 Some more results Pressure drop(Pa) Pressure drop vs. rpm for polypropylene (pipe flow) 5.00E+06 200 °C 4.50E+06 205 °C 4.00E+06 210 °C 3.50E+06 3.00E+06 2.50E+06 2.00E+06 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 rpm Maximum pressure drop: 6.40 MPa 16 18 Final result Maximum velocity possible: 59.180 + 4.127 cm/s (95% CI) Pressure drop (Pa) Pressure Drop vs. Velocity for Polyethylene (annulus) 3.00E+06 2.50E+06 2.00E+06 155 °C 160 °C 165 °C 1.50E+06 1.00E+06 y = 115926x - 318281 5.00E+05 0.00E+00 0.000 y = 109967x - 235980 5.000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000 Velocity (cm/s) 30.000 35.000 40.000 Conclusion Polyethylene can be extruded at a velocity of 59.180 + 4.127 cm/s through a 1” cylindrical pipe die (95% CI) This result holds for temperatures between 155 and 165 °C This value compares well with the industrial flow rate of 0.5 m/s Recommendations Run both Polyethylene and Polypropylene at more temperatures Run both at higher rpm Take samples on same day References Bird, R. B., W. E. Stewart, E. N. Lightfoot. Transport Phenomena. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1960. Ring, T. A. Fundamentals of Ceramic Powder Processing and Synthesis. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996. de Nevers, N. Fluid Mechanics for Chemical Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005. www.chemfinder.com www.nicodemus.org www.search.com Wrap up Project objectives Theory Experimental setup and procedures Results Conclusions and Recommendations References Questions?