Corporate Value and the Cost of Capital Prof. Ian Giddy New York University How to Create Shareholder Value Invest in projects that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate. Choose a financing mix that minimizes the hurdle rate and matches the assets being financed. If there are not enough investments that earn the hurdle rate, return the cash to stockholders. The hurdle rate should be higher for riskier projects and reflect the financing mix used - owners’ funds (equity) or borrowed money (debt) Returns on projects should be measured based on cash flows generated and the timing of these cash flows; they should also consider both positive and negative side effects of these projects. The form of returns - dividends and stock buybacks - will depend upon the stockholders’ characteristics. Manage financial risk Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 4 Create Value When Return on Investments Exceeds Cost of Capital Assets Liabilities Debt Cost of debt Return on Investments Equity Cost of Equity Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 5 The Cost of Capital The cost of capital is a composite cost to the firm of raising financing to fund its projects. It is the discount rate that will be applied to capital investment projects within the firm. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 6 People Expect Higher Returns for Higher Risk $1 Investment in Different Types of Portfolios: 1926-1996 Index ($) 10000 Small Company Stocks $4,495.99 $1,370.95 1000 100 10 Long-Term Government Bonds Large Company Stocks $33.73 $13.54 $8.85 1 Treasury Bills Year-End Inflation 0.1 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 7 Risk Types The risk (variance) on any individual investment can be broken down into two sources. Some of the risk is specific to the firm, and is called firm-specific, whereas the rest of the risk is market wide and affects all investments. The risk faced by a firm can be fall into the following categories – (1) Project-specific; an individual project may have higher or lower cash flows than expected. (2) Competitive Risk, which is that the earnings and cash flows on a project can be affected by the actions of competitors. (3) Industry-specific Risk, which covers factors that primarily impact the earnings and cash flows of a specific industry. (4) International Risk, arising from having some cash flows in currencies other than the one in which the earnings are measured and stock is priced (5) Market risk, which reflects the effect on earnings and cash flows of macro economic factors that essentially affect all companies Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 8 People Can Diversify: Portfolio Return... To compute the return of a portfolio: use the weighted average of the returns of all assets in the portfolio, with the weight given each asset calculated as (value of asset)/(value of portfolio). The portfolio return E(Rp) is: E(Rp) = (w1k1)+(w2k2)+ ... (wnkn) = wj kj where wj = weight of asset j, kj = return on asset j Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 9 People can Diversify: Portfolio Risk The variance of a 2-asset portfolio is: 2 P = w 2A 2A + w 2B 2B + 2w Aw B AB A B where wA and wB are the weights of A and B in the portfolio. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 10 Case Study: A Portfolio GPU Teledyne Kodak Thai Fund Merck ATT TOTAL Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Weight E(R) Std Dev 0 0.1267 0.1715 0.25 0.1396 0.2893 0.25 0.1402 0.3082 0 0.2075 0.3278 0 0.1781 0.341 0.5 0.1126 0.1606 1 Corporate Finance 11 Portfolio Return Computation ASSET RETURN WEIGHT PRODUCT 1 GPU 12.67% 0.00% 0.0000 2 Teledyne 13.96% 25.00% 0.0349 3 Kodak 14.02% 25.00% 0.0351 4 Thai Fund 20.75% 0.00% 0.0000 5 Merck 17.81% 0.00% 0.0000 6 ATT 11.26% 50.00% 0.0563 TOTAL 100% Portfolio return 12.63% Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 12 Portfolio Risk Computation CT STD DEV 0.1715 GPU 0.2893 Teledyne 0.3082 Kodak 0.3278 Thai Fund 0.341 Merck 0.1606 ATT CORRELATION MATRIX ATT Merck Kodak Thai Fund GPU Teledyne 1 1 0.44 1 0.17 0.65 1 0.22 0.44 0.24 1 0.35 0.15 0.13 0.03 0.68 0.4 0.43 0.23 0.6327 Portfolio Variance Portfolio Std Deviation Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy 1 3.48% 18.66% Corporate Finance 13 The Minimum-Variance Frontier of Risky Assets E(r) “Efficient frontier” Individual assets Global minimumvariance portfolio Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 14 Given Return, Find Lowest-Risk Compositions OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS Given Best Composition Return Std. Dev. GPU Teledyne Kodak Thai Fund Merck ATT ALL ATT 0.1126 0.1606 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0.115 0.1548 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 83% 0.12 0.1494 33% 0% 5% 2% 0% 60% 0.125 0.1475 36% 0% 6% 6% 0% 52% MIN RISK 0.1283 0.1471 38% 0% 6% 9% 0% 47% 0.13 0.1472 39% 0% 7% 11% 0% 44% 0.14 0.1509 44% 0% 9% 16% 5% 25% 0.15 0.1572 50% 0% 12% 20% 11% 7% 0.16 0.168 43% 0% 11% 28% 18% 0% 0.17 0.184 30% 0% 9% 37% 24% 0% 0.18 0.2045 17% 0% 7% 46% 30% 0% 0.19 0.2282 4% 0% 5% 55% 36% 0% MAX RETURN 0.2075 0.3278 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% ORIGINAL 12.63% 18.66% 0% 25% 25% 0% 0% 50% Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 15 Plotting the Efficient Frontier 0.25 THAI FUND 0.2 0.15 ORIGINAL 0.1 ATT 0.05 0 0 Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 Corporate Finance 16 The Efficient Frontier of Risky Assets with the Optimal CAL E(r) CAL(P) Efficient frontier rf Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 17 Finding the Optimal Portfolio: Computations Given the Risk-Free rate is: 5.00% OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS Risk Ratio Return Std. Dev. Premium RP/SD GPU 11.26% 0.1606 6.26% 0.390 11.50% 0.1548 6.50% 0.420 12.00% 0.1494 7.00% 0.469 12.50% 0.1475 7.50% 0.508 MIN RISK 12.83% 0.1471 7.83% 0.532 13.00% 0.1472 8.00% 0.543 14.00% 0.1509 9.00% 0.596 15.00% 0.1572 10.00% 0.636 0.655 16.00% 0.168 11.00% 17.00% 0.184 12.00% 0.652 18.00% 0.2045 13.00% 0.636 19.00% 0.2282 14.00% 0.613 THAI 20.75% 0.3278 15.75% 0.480 Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy 0.25 That's the one! 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 Corporate Finance 18 The Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM Says: All investors will choose to hold the market portfolio, ie all assets, in proportion to their market values This market portfolio is rf the optimal risky portfolio The part of a stock’s risk that is diversifiable does not matter to investors. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy E(r) CAL(P) Corporate Finance 19 The Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM Says: The E(r) total risk of a financial asset is made up of two components. A. Diversifiable (unsystematic) risk r f B. Nondiversifiable (systematic) risk The only relevant risk is nondiversifiable risk. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy CAL(P) Corporate Finance 20 The Equation for the CAPM rj = RF + j (rm - RF) where: rj = RF = j rm = = Required return on asset j; Risk-free rate of return Beta Coefficient for asset j; Market return The term [j(rm - RF)] is called the risk premium and (rm-RF) is called the market risk premium Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 21 The Capital Asset Pricing Model Uses variance as a measure of risk Specifies that only that portion of variance that is not diversifiable is rewarded. Measures the non-diversifiable risk with beta, which is standardized around one. Translates beta into expected return Expected Return = Riskfree rate + Beta * Risk Premium Works as well as the next best alternative in most cases. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 22 Limitations of the CAPM 1. The model makes unrealistic assumptions 2. The parameters of the model cannot be estimated precisely - Definition of a market index - Firm may have changed during the 'estimation' period' 3. The model does not work well - If the model is right, there should be a linear relationship between returns and betas the only variable that should explain returns is betas - The reality is that Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy the relationship between betas and returns is weak Other variables (size, price/book value) seem to explain differences in returns better. Corporate Finance 23 Interpreting Beta Market Beta = 1.0 = average level of risk A Beta of .5 is half as risky as average A Beta of 2.0 is twice as risky as average A negative Beta asset moves in opposite direction to market Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 24 Beta Coefficients for Selected Companies Exxon 0.65 AT&T 0.90 IBM 0.95 Wal-Mart 1.10 General Motors1.15 Microsoft 1.30 Harley-Davidson1.65 America Online2.40 Source: From Value Line Investment Survey, April 19, 1996. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 25 Estimating Beta The standard procedure for estimating betas is to regress stock returns (Rj) against market returns (Rm) Rj = a + b R m where a is the intercept and b is the slope of the regression. The slope of the regression corresponds to the beta of the stock, and measures the riskiness of the stock. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 26 Disney’s Historical Beta Disney versus S & P 500: January 1992 - 1996 15 .00% 10 .00% Disney 5.00% 0.00% -6.00% -4.00% -2.00% 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% -5.00% -10 .00% -15 .00% S & P 500 Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 27 The Regression Output ReturnsDisney = -0.01% + 1.40 ReturnsS & P 500 R squared=32.41% Standard error of Beta=0.27 Intercept = -0.01% Slope = 1.40 Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 28 Beta Estimation in Practice: Bloomberg Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 29 Beta Differences: A Look Behind Betas BETA AS A MEASURE OF RISK High Risk America Online: Beta = 2.10: Operates in Risky Business Beta > 1 Above-average Risk Time Warner: Beta = 1.45: High leverage is the reason General Electric: Beta = 1.15: Multiple Business Lines Beta = 1 Average Stock Beta < 1 Below-average Risk Philip Morris: Beta = 1.05: Risk from Lawsuits ???? Microsoft: Beta = 0.95: Size has its advantages Exxon: Beta=0.65: Oil price Risk may not be market risk Oracle: Beta = 0.45: Betas are just estimates Government bonds: Beta = 0 Low Risk Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 30 Determinant 1: Product Type Industry Effects: The beta value for a firm depends upon the sensitivity of the demand for its products and services and of its costs to macroeconomic factors that affect the overall market. Cyclical companies have higher betas than non-cyclical firms Firms which sell more discretionary products will have higher betas than firms that sell less discretionary products Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 31 Determinant 2: Operating Leverage Effects Operating leverage refers to the proportion of the total costs of the firm that are fixed. Other things remaining equal, higher operating leverage results in greater earnings variability which in turn results in higher betas. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 32 Measures of Operating Leverage Fixed Costs Measure = Fixed Costs / Variable Costs This measures the relationship between fixed and variable costs. The higher the proportion, the higher the operating leverage. EBIT Variability Measure = % Change in EBIT / % Change in Revenues This measures how quickly the earnings before interest and taxes changes as revenue changes. The higher this number, the greater the operating leverage. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 33 Determinant 3: Financial Leverage As firms borrow, they create fixed costs (interest payments) that make their earnings to equity investors more volatile. This increased earnings volatility which increases the equity beta Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 34 Betas are Weighted Averages The beta of a portfolio is always the marketvalue weighted average of the betas of the individual investments in that portfolio. Thus, the beta of a mutual fund is the weighted average of the betas of the stocks and other investment in that portfolio the beta of a firm after a merger is the marketvalue weighted average of the betas of the companies involved in the merger. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 35 Firm Betas versus Divisional Betas Firm Betas as weighted averages: The beta of a firm is the weighted average of the betas of its individual projects. At a broader level of aggregation, the beta of a firm is the weighted average of the betas of its individual division. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 36 Bottom-up versus Top-down Beta The top-down beta for a firm comes from a regression The bottom up beta can be estimated by doing the following: Find out the businesses that a firm operates in Find the unlevered betas of other firms in these businesses Take a weighted (by sales or operating income) average of these unlevered betas Lever up using the firm’s debt/equity ratio The bottom up beta will give you a better estimate of the true beta when the standard error of the beta from the regression is high (and) the beta for a firm is very different from the average for the business the firm has reorganized or restructured itself substantially during the period of the regression when a firm is not traded Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 37 Decomposing Disney’s Beta Business Creative Content Retailing Broadcasting Theme Parks Real Estate Disney Business Creative Content Retailing Broadcasting Theme Parks Real Estate Firm Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Unlevered Beta 1.25 1.50 0.90 1.10 0.70 1.09 D/E Ratio Levered Beta 20.92% 1.42 20.92% 1.70 20.92% 1.02 20.92% 1.26 50.00% 0.92 21.97% 1.25 Riskfree Rate 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% Estimated Value Comparable Firms $ 22,167 Motion Picture and TV program producers $ 2,217 High End Specialty Retailers $ 18,842 TV Broadcasting companies $ 16,625 Theme Park and Entertainment Complexes $ 2,217 REITs specializing in hotel and vacation propertiers $ 62,068 Risk Premium 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% Cost of Equity 14.80% 16.35% 12.61% 13.91% 12.08% 13.85% Unlevered Beta Division Weight 1.25 35.71% 1.5 3.57% 0.9 30.36% 1.1 26.79% 0.7 3.57% 100.00% Corporate Finance 38 From Cost of Equity to Cost of Capital The cost of capital is a composite cost to the firm of raising financing to fund its projects. It is the discount rate that will be applied to capital budgeting projects within the firm Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 39 The Cost of Capital Choice Cost 1. Equity - Retained earnings - New stock issues - Warrants Cost of equity - depends upon riskiness of the stock - will be affected by level of interest rates Cost of equity = riskless rate + beta * risk premium 2. Debt - Bank borrowing - Bond issues Cost of debt - depends upon default risk of the firm - will be affected by level of interest rates - provides a tax advantage because interest is tax-deductible Cost of debt = Borrowing rate (1 - tax rate) Debt + equity = Capital Cost of capital = Weighted average of cost of equity and cost of debt; weights based upon market value. Cost of capital = kd [D/(D+E)] + ke [E/(D+E)] Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 40 Estimating Cost of Capital: Disney Equity Debt Cost of Equity = 13.85% Market Value of Equity = $50.88 Billion Equity/(Debt+Equity ) = 82% After-tax Cost of debt = 7.50% (1-.36) = 4.80% Market Value of Debt = $ 11.18 Billion Debt/(Debt +Equity) = 18% Cost of Capital = 13.85%(.82)+4.80%(.18) = 12.22% Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 41 Choosing a Hurdle Rate Either the cost of equity or the cost of capital can be used as a hurdle rate, depending upon whether the returns measured are to equity investors or to all claimholders on the firm (capital) If returns are measured to equity investors, the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of equity. If returns are measured to capital (or the firm), the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of capital. Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 42 Back to First Principles Invest in projects that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate. Choose a financing mix that minimizes the hurdle rate and matches the assets being financed. If there are not enough investments that earn the hurdle rate, return the cash to stockholders. The hurdle rate should be higher for riskier projects and reflect the financing mix used - owners’ funds (equity) or borrowed money (debt) Returns on projects should be measured based on cash flows generated and the timing of these cash flows; they should also consider both positive and negative side effects of these projects. The form of returns - dividends and stock buybacks - will depend upon the stockholders’ characteristics. Manage financial risk Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 43 www.giddy.org Ian Giddy NYU Stern School of Business Tel 212-998-0332; Fax 212-995-4233 ian.giddy@nyu.edu http://www.giddy.org Copyright ©1998 Ian H. Giddy Corporate Finance 47