PowerPoint-presentatie

advertisement
Info session SBO 2016
Overview
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mission FWO and key facts
Characteristics of the SBO-programme.
General outline of a project proposal.
Evaluation process and framework.
Practical recommendations.
Additional information.
3
1. Mission FWO and key facts
1. Mission and key facts
• Mission of the FWO
• Funds fundamental scientific research (‘frontier
research’)
• Since 2016: Strategic Research (SBO, TBM & SB)
5
1. Mission and key facts
Our partners

Universities (Leuven, Ghent, Antwerp, Brussels, Hasselt)

Main (Strategic) Research Centers:
6
1. Mission and key facts
• Label awarded in december 2010
• Implementation of Charter & Code
• Focus on transparent recruitment procedures and
family/gender friendly measures
7
1. Mission and key facts
• Funding schemes of the FWO
• Funding for individual researchers
• Pre- and postdoctoral fellowships, bench fees and grants
• Funding for research teams
• Research projects, Big Science, Bilateral agreements, SBO …
• Supporting mobility, international contacts and collaborations
• travel grants, visiting postdoctoral fellowships, sabbatical leaves, scientific
research communities, organisation of conferences in belgium, international
coordination actions, collaboration agreements, …
• Attracting excellent researchers, active abroad, to Flanders
• Odysseus , Pegasus
• Awarding scientific prizes
• Research Infrastructure
8
1. Mission and key facts
• Budget 2015: 220 million EUR, ca. 79% from Flemish
Government
• Budget 2016: 320 million EUR
Evolutie inkomsten 2005-2015
(in EUR)
€250,000
€200,000
Federale Overheid
€150,000
Vlaamse Overheid
€100,000
Totaal
€50,000
€0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
9
1. Mission and key facts
•
Allocation 2015
Allocation 2015
3%
Mandaten
41%
Wetenschappelijke Contacten
Kredieten aan Navorsers
53%
Onderzoeksprojecten
2%
Administratief Beheer
1%
•
Distribution of the allocation 2015
13%
25%
Wetenschap en technologie
Medische wetenschappen
15%
Interdisciplinair
Cultuurwetenschappen
15%
Gedrags- en maatschappijwetenschappen
29%
Biologische wetenschappen
3%
10
1.
Mission and key facts
Evolution number researchers in function (1st Oct.)
1400
1200
1122
1000
854
781
800
Aspiranten
Onderzoeksprojecten
600
Postdoctorale onderzoekers
400
200
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
11
1. Mission and key facts
• Evolution success rate
40
35
30
25
24
22
20
15
Aspiranten
Postdoctorale onderzoekers
13
Onderzoeksprojecten
10
5
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
12
1. Mission and key facts
• Events
13
2. Characteristics of the SBO-programme
Disclaimer
• This presentation contains only the key points of the
SBO-programme.
• For the actual preparation of a proposal, consult the
appropriate SBO-Handbook and Application Form.
• Information and documents available on:
http://www.fwo.be/nl/mandaten-financiering/onderzoeksprojecten/sbo-projecten/
(nl)
http://www.fwo.be/en/fellowships-funding/research-projects/sbo-projects/
(English)
15
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• Modalities based on Decree of the Flemish Government
concerning the establishment of a financing channel for strategic
basic research in Flanders (3 Oktober 2003 & modification dd.
12/12/2008 & 18/12/2015)
• Continuation of IWT’s SBO programme within the
framework of FWO, with modifications:
• Preliminary registration of project submission by 11 April.
• Companies can not participate as a partner in the SBO
consortium (still important players as member of the advisory
committee)
• Only 1 assessment round, no instruction meeting
16
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• Policy goal
• Financing innovative Strategic Basic Research.
• Tighten cooperation between universities and
industrial/social users.
• Key aspects
• High-quality basic research with a focus on challenging, high-risk,
inventive and original research.
• Open to all scientific disciplines and fields of application
• Strategic interest: valorisation/utilisation prospects on the long
run in Flanders
• Two finality parts: economic or social applications
17
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• Strategic basic research within SBO programme:
• Research is not a goal in itself but an essential mean to allow
for an important new valorisation or knowledge utilisation
• Translate the results into concrete applications: generation of
new products, processes or services, resolution of social
issues, creation of new opportunities for social value creation
• Alignment between the supply-driven focus (from research
organisations) and problem-driven focus (from the demand
site: companies, social actors)
18
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• The SBO-programme is a cooperation oriented
instrument
• Involvement of the economic/social users community in the SBO
project cycle to facilitate a smooth transition between the end of the
SBO-project and the further development and implementation
pathway within the user organisations.
• Requires an investment in meaningful interactions and network
building during the preparation phase of the SBO project with users in
the field i.e. companies (SBO-E) or social/societal actors* (SBO-M),
external to the research organisations.
* social profit organisations, professional groups, government departments/entities,…19
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• Primary finality: defined by the main type of actors who will
take up and use the scientific project results
• Economic finality = primarily through economic actors
(companies/newCo) with an economic value creation objective
(i.e. employment + investments).
• Social finality = primarily through social/societal actors (e.g.
government departments and agencies, civil society organisations,
social profit sector) with a social value creation objective.
• SBO research: still far away from the market: successful SBO
project will initially result in follow-up R&D activities
20
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• Key economic valorisation strategies
• Transfer results to existing companies → follow-up R&D
activities
Requirement for an Industrial advisory committee (“begeleidingscommissie”)
• Transfer to a to be founded spin-off company
• Key social/societal utilisation strategies.
• Transfer results to existing organisations → follow-up R&D &
implementation activities
Requirements for a Social/societal advisory group
Important notice:
The SBO project executors remain the owners of the project results, Transfer to be carried out at
prevailing market conditions and open to all companies in the European Union, including those that
are not a member of the advisory committee . Optional: first right of negotiation or first right of
21
refusal.
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
Two challenges for SBO applicants :
1) Demonstrate scientific potential and design appropriate research
approach.
2) Demonstrate valorisation potential and valorisation approach.
22
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
Two challenges for SBO applicants :
1) Demonstrate scientific potential and design appropriate research
approach.
23
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
Two challenges for SBO applicants :
1) Demonstrate scientific potential and design appropriate research
approach.
2) Demonstrate valorisation potential and valorisation approach.
• Clear vision on the potential for valorisation/utilisation
• Meaningful synergy, interaction dynamics and mobilisation across
institutional boundaries
(research organisations ↔ economic/social actors)
• Active effort and commitment to enable the effective tranfer to and
utilisation of the research results by economic or social actors.
Advisory committee (role before, during & after project)
24
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
Eligible partner organisations: Flemish Research institutions:
•
A research centre is defined as an entity (such as universities or research
institutions, technology transfer agencies, innovation intermediaries, researchoriented physical or virtual collaborative entities), irrespective of its legal status
(organised under public or private law), or way of financing, whose primary goal is
to independently conduct fundamental research, industrial research or experimental
development, or to widely disseminate the results of such activities by way of
teaching, publication or knowledge transfer. Where such entity also pursues
economic activities, the financing, the costs and the revenues of those economic
activities must be accounted for separately. Undertakings that can exert a decisive
influence upon such an entity, for example in the quality of shareholders or
members, may not enjoy preferential access to the research capacity of that entity or
to the results generated by it.
•
Flemish: any research centre with an establishment in the Flemish Region.
Definition of a ‘research and knowledge-dissemination organisation’ as stated in Article 2, section 83 of the Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of the
25
commission of June 17, 2014— Framework for State aid for research and development and innovation (2014/C 198/01)
Article II.2 & II.3 of the Higher Education Code of 11 October 2013 (http://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/document.aspx?docid=14650)
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
Eligible partner organisations: all Flemish Research institutions:
•
•
•
•
Universities
University colleges (‘Hogescholen’)
University Hospitals
IMEC, VITO, VIB, iMINDS, Flanders’ Make, Flanders Marine Institute, and scientific
institutions with a government grant and an establishment in the Flemisch Region
• obliged to submit the proposal together with at least one other Flemish
research institution
• Optional involvement of non-Flemish Research institutions : maximum 20% of the
project budget
• useful knowledge transfer towards Flanders (“missing links” in essential
expertise) & clear added value for the SBO-project (including valorisation
objectives).
26
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
•
Program Budget: circa € 39M
•
Pre-established allocation key
• 2/3 for projects with a economic finality
• 1/3 for projects with a social finality.
•
Project period: 2 to 4 years (project period cannot be extended)
•
At the final financial verification, costs made after the official project period
can be accepted as follows:
• Staff cost: Project period + 1 year
• All other costs: Project periode + 2 years
27
Characteristics of the SBO-programme
• Support: 100% of acceptable costs
• Acceptable costs:
• Max. € 500,000/year/participating legal entity with more than
15% of the total budget
• Research and ‘valorisation preparing’ staffing *
• Operation cost, equipment, subcontracting
• Guideline on the magnitude of the project budget: about €2M
• Exceptions possible if substantiated
* Directly integrated into the relevant research teams of the SBO project consortium, not individuals employed in interface
services or research coordination services and for whom another form of funding is already available
28
3. General outline of a project proposal
General outline of a project proposal
• Before submission: Preliminary registration of
application by 11 April
• e-mail via sbo@fwo.be with following information:
• title of the project
• summary of the project (approx. half A4)
• project partners
• project coordinator.
• Optional: experts to be avoided (max. 5)*
* No changes/additions possible at submission
General outline of a project proposal
 Deadline submission: 23 May 2016, noon
 Electronic submission via Email to sbo@fwo.be (max
15 MB)
 3 separate files
 Project & valorisation part in English
 According to the template on the website
31
3 separate file – max 15 mb
General outline of a project proposal
• Part 1
• Part 2
•
•
•
•
•
Project sheet and project summary
Description of the intended valorisation and
transfer of knowledge
Part 3
Scientific project description
Part 4
Expertise and track record of the consortium
Appendix A
Administrative data of applicants
Appendix B
Substantiated letters of intent of users
Term sheet between research partners
Ethical questionnaire
Budget
Excel file with the project budget
See submission template on fwo website for more details
32
General outline of a project proposal
Important aspects of the application template.
• Importance of early interactions with interface and transfer
services (http://www.ttoflanders.be)
• Use the application template and respect maximal proposal
length (i.e. eligibility criterion) into account .
• Please refrain from non-requested annexes.
• Project proposals are only submitted by email (SBO@fwo.be).
33
General outline of a project proposal
Project budget: see Cost model and Excel Template on the website




Staffing costs (gross salaries):
o Only research staff and valorization preparing staff working on the project
o Double financing is not allowed
Other costs: real costs up to a maximum of € 40,000/year:
o Direct costs (materials, IT-costs, traveling expenses, depreciation costs for
research equipment, subcontractor costs < € 8.500)
o Indirect costs or overhead costs: max. € 20.000/year
Large subcontractor costs (for subcontractor costs > € 8.500):
o At market price (full cost + margin)
o Quote necessary
Large cost (exceptional!! Needs detailed motivation):
o E.g. very expensive tests like imaging or sequencing
o Only accepted when this cost cannot be added in the previous categories
34
General outline of a project proposal.
Important aspects of the application template: USERS/advisory committee
• No longer possible for companies/social actors to participate as a partner in the SBO
consortium (still possible as subcontractor: tasks without creative input = no IPR)
• Advisory committee open to all interested companies, including outside the Flemish
region
• Advisory committee: cover whole valorisation chain: Elaborate on the role of each
individual user
• Elaborate on active involvement and commitment of user organisations (pre, intra,
post-project).
• Dynamics of the advisory committee - members' expectations : elaborated vision on
intellectual property rights/transfer of project results, especially for members that are
active in overlapping areas of applications and/or field were exclusivity is common.
35
General outline of a project proposal.
Important aspects of the application template: USERS/advisory committee
• Substantiate early and meaningful interactions and cooperations between
researchers and the users from the early definition and design phase of the
project proposal onwards → i.e. enabler for meaningful interaction dynamics
over the lifecycle of the project
• Mention parallel R&D collaborations, follow-up R&D activities and
implementation efforts → beneficial for feasibility/likelyhood of the valorisation
approach after the SBO-project
• SBO-M: Application oriented activities from the third project year onwards to
bridge the gap between SBO-results and societal implementation (advantage in
selection process!). Activities to be performed by the social actors – no fwo
funding
Substantiated letters of interest
Important Guidance document
Manual for users Economic/social
36
General outline of a project proposal
Important aspects of the application template: USERS/advisory committee
Only for Economic programme part, NOT for social programme part:
• Mandatory input by all companies of the advisory committee
• monetary contribution (SME: €250/year; large enterprise and other organization
€1,000/year)
• ‘In kind’ contribution can be accepted provided it is well substantiated.
• Higher contribution is not obligatory but maybe positively assessed in the
evaluation of the proposal.
•
No obligation for spin-off earmarked projects
•
Contribution confirmed in letters of intent of companies
•
Letters of interest: Ideally fulfilled by submission, the latest by 24 June 2016.
37
General outline of a project proposal.
• Lesson from 2011-2012 call.
•
Impact of the (then optional) financial input from companies in the economic
programme part
With input from
companies
Without input from
companies
Total
Number of
proposals
submitted
15
Number of
projects
supported
8
Average
success
rate
53%
16
2
13%
31
10
32%
38
General outline of a project proposal
Important aspects of the application template.
Appendix B includes
-
Substantiated letter of intent of a company/organisation
- to participate in the advisory committee
- signed by a legal representative of this company or organisation.
- only for SBO-E: (monetary) contribution
-
a term sheet (“afsprakennota”) between the partners of the consortium on
the management and the allocation of the IPR).
- Prepared in close interaction with the TTO services
- signed by a legal representative of the participating institutions.
- Due by first half of September 2016
39
4.Evaluation process
and framework.
Evaluation process and framework.
• Evaluation proces
• One single selection round.
• Evaluation of the scientific quality & utilisation/valorisation quality by 34 international experts
• Applicants may reply to expert comments and valorisation-related
questions from FWO staff*
• Expert recommendations and written feedback from the applicants →
FWO staff* prepares the reporting to the SBO steering committees
(Economic/Social)
• SBO steering committees rank the proposals
• Decision on support by the FWO Board of Directors (Nov/Dec 2016)
* with support of staff from the AGENCY FOR INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (www.vlaio.be)
41
Evaluation process and framework
• Assessment framework
• Scientific quality
• Scientific added value, strategic & challenging character
• Intrinsic scientific feasibility
• Quality of research approach & project planning
• Input-output balance: value for money
• R&D competence & infrastructure
• Valorisation quality
• Potential application & relevance of the research approach
• Quality and feasibility of valorisation approach (including pre-project phase)
• Valorisation competence/track record
• Sustainable development (if applicable)
•
Scoring grid and selection methodology available on FWO-website
42
Evaluation process and framework
• Minimal requirements and ranking mechanism.
Possible scores that can be awarded per (sub)criterion are:
∆-score
•
•
•
•
•
•
Insufficient information to assess the criterion
Unacceptable
Poor
Reasonable
Positive
Excellent
exclusion
exclusion
-2
-1
0
+1
43
Evaluation process and framework
• Minimal requirements and ranking mechanism.
- Double weight to criteria S1.1 (delta with respect to state-of-the-art) and S1.2
(challenging, high-risk and inventive character of the research)
- Minimal eligibility requirement: “reasonable” (delta score > -2) for both assessment
dimensions (scientific quality or utilisation)
- Selection advantage (SBO-E) for projects contributing to sustainable development.
- Projects which meet the minimal requirements are ranked: equal weight for the
scientific quality and valorisation quality scores.
- In case of projects with equivalent scores: diversity of application areas can be
aimed for.
- Quota for SBO-E projects directed at the creation of a new spin-off company: max
20% of budget of economic SBO-programme.
- The highest ranked project proposals are supported within the limits of the available
budget.
44
5. Practical recommendations.
Practical recommendations when preparing a proposal.
• Proces of creation of an SBO-proposal is different from a
“classic” academic research proposal
•Be prepared to invest adequate time and effort in the
proposal preparation process.
•Key importance of meaningful two-way dialogue and interaction
between researchers and economic or social/societal usersfrom the
early project conception onwards and over the entire project life
cycle. Discuss project scope + cooperation principles + valorisation
intentions.
•Interact early with university interface or transfer services.
•Adopt a project management approach.
46
Practical recommendations when preparing a proposal.
• Carefully read the documents on the website and contact
FWO in case you should have questions (sbo@fwo.be)
• Ensure good coherence between the scientific part and
the valorisation aims of your proposal.
• Think beyond the end date of the SBO-project.
• Let users elaborate on follow-up R&D and implementation interests and
opportunities.
• Valorisation/utilisation is not just “dissemination”.
• User involvement is not just “claiming being interested”.
47
6. Additional information.
Additional information.
• Preliminary registration deadline: 11 April 2016
• Submission deadline: 23 May 2016, noon
• Potential applicants can make a request before
February 18 for an exploratory meeting
(“verkennend gesprek”) at FWO on 25, 26 or 29
February. E-mail a short abstract, most important
questions (max. 1 A4 p.) & preferred date to
sbo@fwo.be
49
Additional information
SBO in international cooperations.
• In 2016: no call under the Lead Agency agreements
with STW (Netherlands)
50
Additional information.
• SBO contact
SBO@fwo.be
• Website
http://www.fwo.be/nl/mandaten-financiering/onderzoeksprojecten/sbo-projecten/
http://www.fwo.be/en/fellowships-funding/research-projects/sbo-projects/
ONGOING SBO PROJECTS (awarded < 1/1/2016) WILL CONTINUE TO BE FOLLOWED UP
BY THE AGENCY FOR INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (www.vlaio.be)
51
Additional information
When requesting compute infrastructure
 When you outgrow your laptop, think VSC
 It is part of FWO
Tier - 0
15 PF
 Two types of resources:
 Tier-2 local at universities
Tier -1
 Tier-1 for capability computing
623 TF
 Contact local HPC staff
16,240 CPU cores
128/256 GB memory/node
IB EDR interconnect
Tier -2
Local clusters
Tier -3
Laptop, workstation
HOPPER/TURING
STEVIN
THINKING/CEREBRO
HYDRA
Why use
centrally managed compute resources ?
No overhead
Flexible resources
Added value
Hardware maintenance
Peak workloads
User support
Software maintenance
Storage size and speed
Training
Maintenance costs
Up-to-date hardware
Consulting
Done for you!
Available for you!
Enabling you!
Download