Rule Dynamics: A Journey into Organizational Intelligence Exploring the tension between performance and accountability Overview Motivation for the research topic Description of key concepts Some literature Model that guides the research Research Implications for future research Motivation for the research topic The pressures that individuals—specially managers—in organizations face to generate results (performance) are increased by the pressures to do it in a responsible way that can be traceable and clear (accountability) to protect all constituencies interested in the results of the organization. Description of key concepts Intelligence: In a general way, intelligence refers the the ability to achieve outcomes that fulfill desires as much as possible (March, 1999, p.1) An intelligent organization is one that adopts procedures that consistently do well (in the organization’s own terms) in the face of constraints imposed by such things as scarce resources and competition. This is hard to do Ignorance Uncertainty Conflict Collaboration Ambiguity Evaluative basis Some literature Argyris, C. and D. A. Schön (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. New York, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. March, J. G. (1999). The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence. Malden, Massachusetts, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. March, J. G., M. Schulz and X. Zhou (2000). The Dynamics of Rules. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press. McCaffrey, D. P. and D. W. Hart (1998). Wall Street Policies Itself: How Securities Firms Manage the Legal Hazards of Competitive Pressures. New York, Oxford University Press. Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox : the art of political decision making. New York, W.W. Norton. A theory Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices A theory Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Planned Action A theory Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Planned Action Action Actual Results (Real World) A theory Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Behavioral Single-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Planned Action Action Actual Results (Real World) A theory Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Action Actual Results (Real World) A theory Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Action Unplanned Action Actual Results (Real World) Performance Paradox Cycle Autonomous Pressures A theory Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Action Unplanned Action Actual Results (Real World) Performance Paradox Cycle Autonomous Pressures A theory Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Structural Single-loop learning Perception of Structure/Feedback Mechanisms/Compensating Effects Action Unplanned Action Actual Results (Real World) Performance Paradox Cycle Autonomous Pressures Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information A theory Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Structural Double-loop learning Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Action Structural Single-loop learning Perception of Structure/Feedback Mechanisms/Compensating Effects x Unplanned Action Actual Results (Real World) Performance Paradox Cycle Autonomous Pressures Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information A theory Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Structural Double-loop learning Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Structural Single-loop learning Perception of Structure/Feedback Mechanisms/Compensating Effects Action Unplanned Action Actual Results (Real World) Performance Paradox Cycle Autonomous Pressures Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Environment Environment Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Images of Rules Rules as rational efforts to organize Rules as proliferating organisms Rules as constructions of meaning Rules in teams Rules in systems involving conflicts of interest Artifacts, transitional objects Rules as codings of history Depositories of knowledge (org memory ) Written rules and unwritten rules Elements to Explore Adaptation, selection, filtering: The dynamics involved in translating results (history) into rules. Implementation.- The dynamics involved in translating rules into action. Understanding: The complications involved in understanding the dynamics between actions and results. Adaptation/Selection/Filtering Search for efficiency vs. search for homogeneity.(March, Schulz, and Zhou, 2000) Adaptation/Selection/Filtering Rules are: Actors: Economics Solutions to Selfmetagames interested Sociology Given Basic assumption about rules: Rules are discovered and become dominant as a result of the pursuit of efficiency Competitive Rules spread to create pockets of homogeneous institutions, independent of any technical imperative Implementation The rules found in any collection of rules are numerous, ambiguous, and conflicting. As a result, action depends on what rules are evoked, what meaning is given to them, and how conflicts among them are noticed, interpreted, and acted upon. (March, Schulz, and Zhou, 2000, p. 23) Understanding Individuals in organizations develop stories of history to interpret their experiences, particularly the relation between their actions and the outcomes they realize. This process exhibit biases (March, 1994). Research Adaptation, selection, filtering Evolution of a Dynamic Theory of Regulation: Modeling the Emergence of ‘Self-regulation’ Mechanisms in Financial Markets Understanding Exploring the Effectiveness and Efficiency Paradox: The Role of Compensating Feedback Effects on Overall Performance: Modeling the ORMA Case— Office of Regulatory and Management Assistance in New York State Implications for future research Perception of Behavior/Problems/ Environment/Effectiveness of Actions Behavioral Double-loop learning Mental Models/ Policies/Rules/ Best Practices Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Behavioral Single-loop learning Planned Action Structural Double-loop learning Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Structural Single-loop learning Perception of Structure/Feedback Mechanisms/Compensating Effects Action Unplanned Action Actual Results (Real World) Performance Paradox Cycle Autonomous Pressures Filtering, Assesing, Selecting Information Environment Environment Reflection, Adaptation, Innovation, Deep Change Feedback