4-H Afterschool
Club & Program Evaluations
By Kendra Crooks
ISU Extension Youth Development Field Specialist
641-394-2174
WHY? ! ?
Why Evaluate?
To determine level of satisfaction
To determine cost/time effectiveness
To determine if did what said would do (learn new
concept or skill) - meet set standards
To measure developmental levels
To get $$$- be accountable to stakeholders
To determine if reaching target audience and how
compare to others/averages
To determine future needs of clients
To determine changes for the future
Outcomes vs. Activities
BE OUTCOME DRIVEN,
NOT ACTIVITY DRIVEN
Methods to Collect
Evaluation Information
Tests
Thank you’s received
Interviews
Observation (seeing and listening)
Attendance or Repeat Attendance
Group Assessments
Testimonial Statements
Methods to Collect
Evaluation Information
Standard Surveys & Questionnaires
Case Studies
Expert or Peer Review
Portfolio Reviews
Diaries or Journals
Simulations or Problem Stories
Creative Expression
Unobstructive Measures (wear on mat by display)
IoWays to Evaluate
Annual Reports (ES237)
Statistics shows number of clients
Shows demographic data
New categories in 2004 - “heads up” for
messages from Becky Nibe
POW reports
Comparing work to state POW plan - meet
identified needs and outcome indicators
IoWays to Evaluate
Targeting Life Skills
(survey assessments)
Generic model that provides a way to identify life skill
development
Uses 4 headings of “Head, Heart, Health and Hands” with two
general categories under each
Life skill development is mapped sequentially over four age
groupings to indicate a continuum of growth
Overhead Sample
Targeting Life Skills Model
Patricia Hendricks, ISU Extension
Targeting Life Skills Model
Tool used to assess impact of life skill development
Based on program objectives stating desired changes as result of
program. Aids in being accountable for funds - program succeed in
making the intended difference in lives of youth?
Model provides a way to coordinate life skill development with ages
and stages tasks so programs can be developmentally appropriate
and effective in achieving identified outcomes.
By assigning developmentally appropriate tasks for specific life skills
TSL model has potential to improve possibility of getting
measurable program success.
Additional Way to Evaluate
Logic Model
University of Wisconsin Extension
Evaluation tool used by many other agencies
Follows sequence to describe what program
is and will do through outcomes/impact
Logic Model
based on University of Wisconsin Extension
Situation
Outputs
Inputs
Outcome/Impacts
Activities Participation
What we invest
What we
do
Assumptions
Who we
reach
Short
term
Medium
term
Ultimate
results
External Factors
What Makes Up a Logic Model?
Programs are a response to a situation.
Programs have INPUTS that lead to
OUTPUTS that lead to OUTCOMES and
ultimate IMPACTS.
A logic model is a display of these elements and
underlying assumptions set within the program’s
environment.
What Makes Up a Logic Model?
Situation: the condition that gives rise to the program
INPUTS: the resources and contributions that
extension and others make to the effort: Time,
people, money, materials, equipment, etc.
INPUTS are converted into OUTPUTS
What Makes Up a Logic Model
(continued)
OUTPUTS: activities and products that reach
people who participate.
These OUTPUTS are intended to achieve
certain OUTCOMES.
OUTCOMES: changes or benefits for individuals,
families, groups communities, organizations, systems.
Outcomes often occur along a path from shorter to
longer term achievements that result in human,
economic, civic or environmental IMPACT.
What Makes Up a Logic Model
(continued)
OUTCOMES may be positive, negative or neutral:
intended or unintended.
Assumptions: beliefs we have about the program and
the way we think it will work; principles that guide the
program.
Environment: the context and external conditions in
which the program exists and which influence the
success of the program.