Elida Local Schools Financial Summit Report to Stakeholders Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Joel L. Parker,CPA Summit Team Lynn Metzger, Metzger Financial Services Bruce Opperman, WLIO Brenda Stocker, State Superintendent’s Parent Advisory Council Phillip Morton, WORTH Center Matt Huffman, State Representative Pat Schymanski, General Dynamics Peter Kesler, Ohio Foam Corporation Cliff Barber, Citizens National Bank David Anderson, The State Bank Max Stover, First Federal Bank Steve Boroff, Superior Federal Credit Union Tim Niebel, Fifth Third Securities Beth Jokinen, The Lima News Mike Ford, Delphos Herald Mike Klaus, EEA Sally Ulrich, Elida Board President Don Diglia, Elida Local Schools Superintendent Joel Parker, Elida Local Schools Treasurer Faith Lee, Elida Local Schools NCLB Director Elida Accounting Students Goals Review the financial condition of Elida Local Schools Expand the knowledge base on school funding issues Review data for future levies Exchange ideas on “best practices” Encourage dialogue on future economic trends Have summit representative report to the Board of Education on current condition THERE IS NO BUSINESS LIKE PUBLIC SCHOOL BUSINESS Ohio Revised Code No Child Left Behind Unfunded mandates DeRolph case Collective Bargaining Tax structure State Budget Levies/Bond Issues Phantom Revenue Voters Raw product - 100% accepted Emotional Issues TYPES OF LEVIES BOND LEVY – Used to finance permanent improvements,new construction or renovation (Per ORC-MAY NOT BE USED FOR OPERATIONS) PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT LEVY- Used for repairs/fixed assets with a useful life of 5 years (can be limited or continuing) and can be renewed or replaced TYPES OF LEVIES OPERATING LEVY-Used for current operations (can be limited or continuing) can be renewed or replaced EMERGENCY LEVY-Used for operations (limited to 5 years and generates a set amount) can be renewed but not replaced RENEW=same effective rate REPLACE=original millage Legislative Concerns/History HB 920 Tax Reduction Factor HB 152 Phantom Revenue Budget Reduction Order HB 95 Inventory Tax Phase Out HB 282 Favored Charter Schools HB 412 Mandated spending on repairs/educational supplies SB 55 Increase in testing requirements NCLB Increase in testing HOW MANY CLIENTS? Students Tax payers Boosters Parents Business partners Local officials WHO ARE WE? Students – 2,478 Teachers- 144 Nurse –1 Guidance – 4 Professionals – 15 Secretaries – 16 Aides – 14 Maintenance –2 Custodial – 12 Food Service – 26 Bus Drivers – 30 4 Buildings 81 square miles PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Profit Margin 1-5% Strength of Carry-over - 60 day 80% Rule on Salaries and Benefits Debt to Total Assets Residential Tax Rate AUDIT LIST Annual Financial Audit by Auditor of State ADM Audit by ODE(every 5 years) Staffing Audit by ODE(5 years ago) Curriculum Review by ODE Annual Facility Inspection (Jared’s Law) Cash Graph 60 DAY CASH BALANCE ALMOST A REALITY 5,000,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Ja nu Fe ary br ua ry M ar ch Ap ril M ay Ju ne Ju l Au y Se gu pt st em b O er ct N obe ov em r D ec ber em be r General Fund Cash 6,000,000 Month June 30 Carry-Over *Gaining Strength* 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 $ 936,422 $1,048,819 $ 758,675 $ 821,146 $ 360,933 $ 967,429 $1,865,900 $2,645,703 21 days 23 days 17 days 18 days 8 days 21 days 39 days 53 days WHAT CHANGED? Staff cuts Administrative cuts $239,155 Streamlined food service Moved staff to PPO insurance plan Moved to pay to participate Passed a levy in 2005 to bring back specific programs Revenue Chart FYD as of June 30, 2006 General Fund 6% 5% 1% Real Estate 40% Personal Property Foundation Restricted Aid Homestead/Roll Other 40% 8% Expense Chart FYD as of June 30, 2006 2% 0% 0% 3% 4% Salaries 19% Retire/Ins 54% Purchased Service Supplies Capital Outlay 18% Debt-Prin. Debt-Int. General Fund Expenditures Other Elida Transportation Data 500,000 Amount 400,000 Miles Gallons Expense 300,000 200,000 100,000 - 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Miles 428,886 440,673 415,682 376,971 372,549 402,349 Gallons 83,123 67,209 63,354 60,504 57,217 62,220 Expense 86,985 61,233 70,591 66,988 92,372 144,618 Fiscal Year FOOD SERVICE Fiscal Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Revenue Federal State Local 243,346 10,072 594,211 234,529 10,092 576,010 223,494 10,756 561,344 278,530 10,706 575,917 243,644 12,630 586,843 239,122 13,207 513,334 320,161 11,028 575,959 Total 847,629 820,631 795,594 865,153 843,117 765,663 907,148 Expenses Salaries Fringes Purchased Service Supplies Equipment 325,736 134,816 9,128 339,680 9,333 332,741 156,892 8,421 338,004 12,348 345,760 198,125 5,285 327,304 20,709 353,996 211,198 5,011 314,984 - 350,154 245,929 4,507 292,572 - 276,396 181,288 7,022 279,624 16,241 283,380 153,651 11,485 307,740 - Total 818,693 848,406 897,183 885,189 893,162 760,571 756,256 28,936 (27,775) (101,589) (20,036) (50,045) 5,092 150,892 Plus Advances Plus Beginning Bal. 111,602 140,538 112,763 48,636 11,174 40,000 39,774 54,000 29,726 88,818 Ending Balance 140,538 112,763 11,174 39,774 29,729 88,818 239,710 Net Gain/(Loss) 5 Year Forecast 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.035 1.040 1.050 1.060 Revenues General Property Tax (Real Estate) Tangible Personal Property Tax Income Tax Unrestricted Grants-in-Aid Restricted Grants-in-Aid Property Tax Allocation All Other Revenues 1.070 Total Revenues 2.010 2.020 2.040 2.050 2.060 2.070 Other Financing Sources Proceeds from Sale of Notes State Emergency Loans and Advancements (Approved) Operating Transfers-In Advances-In All Other Financing Sources Total Other Financing Sources 2.080 Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 4.010 4.020 4.030 4.040 4.050 4.055 4.060 4.300 Expenditures Personal Services Employees' Retirement/Insurance Benefits Purchased Services Supplies and Materials Capital Outlay Intergovernmental Debt Service: Principal-All (Historical Only) Principal-Notes Principal-State Loans Principal-State Advancements Principal-HB 264 Loans Principal-Other Interest and Fiscal Charges Other Objects 4.500 Total Expenditures 5.010 5.020 5.030 5.040 Other Financing Uses Operating Transfers-Out Advances-Out All Other Financing Uses Total Other Financing Uses 5.050 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 6.010 3.010 3.020 3.030 3.040 3.050 3.060 7.010 7.020 Actual Fiscal Year 2004 Fiscal Year 2005 Fiscal Year 2006 $6,584,688 1,463,699 $6,852,071 1,497,346 $7,354,275 1,531,472 7,561,375 79,501 829,212 882,998 7,502,306 64,011 895,012 1,129,184 7,434,281 126,781 913,801 1,191,073 17,401,473 17,939,930 18,551,683 51,028 16,000 51,028 16,000 67,214 527 67,741 17,452,501 17,955,930 18,619,424 9,864,196 3,219,649 2,843,428 369,007 4,116 9,322,548 3,144,906 3,226,038 475,893 334,935 9,731,655 3,189,571 3,445,327 631,558 463,637 71,638 63,736 46,942 65,821 10,511 35,597 287,520 27,279 287,495 2,248 309,612 16,758,887 16,931,857 17,784,119 28,626 56,000 121,214 55,511 84,626 121,214 55,511 16,843,513 17,053,071 17,839,630 Excess of Revenues and Other Financing Sources over (under) Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 608,988 902,859 779,794 Cash Balance July 1 - Excluding Proposed Renewal/Replacement and New Levies 360,933 969,921 1,872,780 Cash Balance June 30 969,921 1,872,780 2,652,574 AUDIT REPORT Performed every year Cost to taxpayers $15,000 Cash basis (saves taxpayers $10,000$13,000 each year) Tests are performed on accounts payable, payroll, compliance with ORC, fund raising, athletics, etc Clean opinion No adjustments Salary Data – Get the Facts!! Elida Local Schools Salary Data Fiscal Year 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 TOTAL Classified & Teaching 5% 4% 1.5% 3% 3.5% 17% Administration 6% 0% 0% 3% 3.5% 12.5% The Lima News-April 1, 2007 Top 25 Lima Total $928,919(7 of top 25) Shawnee Total $915,855(5 of top 25) Bath Total $836,848 (5 of top 25) Apollo Total $829,174 (1 of top 25) Elida Total $760,064 (1 at 16th) Delphos Total $753,602 (3 of top 25) The Lima News April 1, 2007Superintendent Salary Data Lima $115,269 Crestview $108,159 Allen East $102,019 Delphos $101,457 Auglaize ESC $96,600 New Bremen $93,767 Lincolnview $93,711 Putnam ESC $93,565 Waynesfield $92,426 Elida $91,628 How does our 2006 residential tax rate stack up? Residential Tax Rate 2006 31.44 Lima City 31.26 Allen East 31.15 Bath 29.76 Shawnee 29.23 Bluffton 27.86 Perry 27.09 Spencerville (Plus 1% income tax) 27.14 ELIDA 26.80 Delphos ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES Administrative Expenditures Lima City School Expenditures Per Pupil $1,228 Percentage of Total Expenditures 13.1% State Expenditures $1,143 12.2% Spencerville $1,025 13.3% Delphos City $1,005 12.7% Allen East $961 12.9% Perry $933 13.4% Bath $882 11.7% Bluffton $856 11.1% Shawnee $831 11.5% Elida $811 11.3% Administration: Salaries for administrators, office staff, and office supplies BUILDING EXPENSES Building Operations Expenditures Bluffton Expenditures Per Pupil $1,804 Percentage of Total Expenditures 23.3% State Expenditures $1,779 19.0% Shawnee $1,749 24.2% Bath $1,716 22.7% Lima City $1,673 17.9% Perry $1,664 23.9% Allen East $1,567 21.0% Spencerville $1,529 19.8% Elida $1,412 19.7% Delphos $1,326 16.8% Building Operations:Utilities, maintenance, repairs, busses and lunchroom expenses Staff Support Expenses Staff Support Expenditures Lima City Expenditures Per Pupil $389 Percentage of Total Expenditures 4.2% State Expenditures $293 3.1% Bluffton $155 2.0% Elida $90 1.3% Spencerville $51 0.7% Bath $35 0.5% Allen East $34 0.4% Perry Local $25 0.4% Shawnee $24 0.3% Delphos $12 0.1% Staff Support: Teacher training and other professional development activities Pupil Support Expenses Pupil Support Expenditures State Expenditures Expenditures Per Pupil $935 Percentage of Total Expenditures 10.0% Lima City $931 9.9% Delphos $907 11.5% Bath $851 11.3% Spencerville $806 10.5% Shawnee $727 10.1% Allen East $688 9.2% Bluffton $672 8.7% Elida $669 9.4% Perry $623 9.0% Pupil Support: Salaries for librarians, counselors, and nurses Instructional Support Instructional Expenditures State Expenditures Expenditures Per Pupil $5,205 Percentage of Total Expenditures 55.6% Lima City $5,148 54.9% Delphos $4,664 58.9% Spencerville $4,299 55.8% Bluffton $4,244 54.9% Allen East $4,220 56.5% Elida $4,169 58.3% Bath $4,070 53.9% Shawnee $3,891 53.9% Perry $3,704 53.3% Instruction: Teacher and education professional salaries and classroom materials STATE FUNDING FLAWS Over-reliant on property taxes No inflationary growth on property taxes Phantom Revenue Unfunded mandates System too complicated Waste many man hours on levies(2000,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007) One of the few ways voters can express frustration with taxes PHANTOM REVENUE Who is it?? State assumes we receive 23 mills from local tax payers Elida actually receives 20 mills This 3 mill gap is a huge problem The State deducts 3 more mills than we actually receive See SF3 handout (making sausage) State Aid-Short Version $5,403 x 1.00687x2,442.15=13,285,586 Less 8,226,036(.023 x357,653,735) _______________ $5,059,550 23 Mill Charge- Off FY 2005 $7,383,852 FY 2006 $7,870,054 FY 2007 $8,226,035 State Aid FY FY FY FY 2006 2007 2008 2009 $7,520,508 $7,520,508 $7,458,619 $7,458,619 TAX BASE Tax Valuations Collected Year 1999 Values 2000 Values 2001 Values 2002 Values 2003 Values 2004 Values 2005 Values 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Ag/Residential Commercial/Industrial Sub Total 164,693,830 70,131,360 234,825,190 175,352,850 70,709,240 246,062,090 179,161,050 72,432,590 251,593,640 182,378,550 73,126,890 255,505,440 213,179,340 87,268,820 300,448,160 216,149,940 90,926,040 307,075,980 219,179,010 91,884,270 311,063,280 Utility Real Total Real 40,220 234,865,410 45,900 246,107,990 43,010 251,636,650 45,410 255,550,850 47,120 300,495,280 47,890 307,123,870 31,820 311,095,100 12,149,290 36,829,336 48,978,626 11,460,990 37,055,024 48,516,014 9,296,660 40,797,097 50,093,757 9,603,630 39,268,817 48,872,447 9,517,850 32,993,852 42,511,702 9,280,790 36,274,840 45,555,630 8,795,910 27,665,882 36,461,792 283,844,036 294,624,004 301,730,407 304,423,297 343,006,982 352,679,500 347,556,892 20,080,550 20,324,880 20,946,010 20,946,010 20,946,010 24,203,770 24,291,910 Utility Personal Tangible Personal Total Personal Total All Exempt Values STATE BUDGET BREAKDOWN Primary & Secondary Education 35% Medicaid 20% Colleges 13% State Budget Concerns-FY 2010 CAT $ 1.3 billion new Corporate Franchise Tax 1.1 billion loss Tangible Property Tax 1.6 billion loss Income Tax 2.1 billion loss NET LOSS 3.5 billion in state revenue CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT High-quality education is a fundamental right for every Ohio child Determine levels of funding based on student need Eliminate “Phantom Revenue” Exempt Ohio seniors and disabled from property taxes on the first $40,000 of the market value of their homes Create an independent commission appointed by Ohio’s top elected leaders(to monitor efficiency) Direct the commission to report annually to the governor Create and maintain a permanent local government fund to support local government services Establish a system to fund colleges at no less than 2007 amounts and increases annually based on state’s personal income percentage ELIDA BUILDING PROJECT Elida High School $35,600,000 Elida Middle School Addition $4,500,000 Demolition $2,300,000 Total $42,400,000 6.8 mills and ½ mill PI Levy WHY NOW? Close two 90+ year old buildings Take advantage of current construction costs (over 26 month period,cost went up $5 million) Improve air quality and handicap accessibility Expand community partnerships Protect local and community real estate values Better investment of tax-payer money Excellent strategic planning The need goes back to 1969---The time is now! FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 Total High School 23,799 35,209 27,918 81,276 32,830 34,144 58,311 59,248 91,489 80,184 67,983 592,391 PI Repairs-10 years 414,235 Total FY 96-06 HS HS-11 Year Ave. 1,006,626 91,511 Middle School 9,627 15,804 15,502 22,623 67,997 15,890 13,894 23,447 26,079 36,326 18,012 247,189 Elida Ele. 3,349 10,481 25,997 14,225 19,228 2,141 5,937 7,003 6,084 56,356 31,475 150,801 DISTRICT WIDE REPAIRS Gomer 7,901 17,348 31,014 53,493 15,411 26,167 8,361 16,811 31,830 17,054 33,381 225,390 Building Data FY 05-06 Cost per building/per student Gomer Repairs 33,381 Elida High Repairs Heat 28,212 Heat Electric 40,068 Electric Water 10,164 Water 67,983 122,339 36,699 9,516 Total 111,825 Total 236,537 ADM 199 ADM 811 Per Student Elida Ele. Repairs 562 Per Student 292 31,475 Elida Middle Repairs 18,012 Heat 32,187 Heat 35,260 Electric 30,846 Electric 61,450 Water 9,516 Water 9,516 Total 104,024 Total 124,238 ADM 855 ADM 574 Per Student 122 Per Student 216 28 year savings when Gomer is closed Repairs/Utilities $2,000,000 Staff reductions $2,800,000 Heating System $1,017,000 Electrical $ 468,468 Handicap access $ 432,232 Total $6,717,700 (Other potential repairs do exist) 5 Year Goals Pass a building bond issue Continue to monitor health insurance (Health Savings Accounts, Spousal language, Mandate Generic Drugs)…impact of state pool Enhance customer service Maintain 0-5% profit margin Continue to review staffing needs Monitor new legislation Others ???? (group discussion) Cliff S. Barber Lima City President Citizens National Bank “From a cost savings standpoint the bond issue is a "nobrainer". The annual maintenance cost for the old high school alone is over $100,000per year and that does not include the $122,000 per year in heating costs. Also, the addition to the middle school will save $4.4 million in operating and personnel expenses over the life of the bond by allowing the district to operate three buildings instead of four thus allowing the middle school addition to pay for itself. “ David A. Anderson President - Lima Region The State Bank and Trust Company “I haven’t talked to anyone that won’t agree Elida NEEDS a new high school. I don’t think anyone could reasonably argue otherwise. Both the high school and Gomer buildings are tired and costly. For example, over the past 10 years alone our school district has spent $4.80/sf, $4.39/sf and $2.87/sf on repairs at the Gomer building, high school and middle school, respectively. By comparison that translates into $300,000 of excess costs being absorbed to keep the older buildings operational. If a major problem presents itself at the high school or Gomer, which is highly probable, we’ll be forced to put more “band-aids on craters.” We need to take action now. Waiting would cost everyone much, much more…and we’re not just talking about money!” David A. Anderson President - Lima Region The State Bank and Trust Company “It is clearly documented that new school facilities improve attitudes and enhance the education process. If we do not update our facilities we not only leave money on the table (35% from the State of Ohio), we all but assure ourselves that future graduating classes will continually fall behind their peers that have access to better technology and equipment that come with new buildings.” David A. Anderson President - Lima Region The State Bank and Trust Company “From an economic development perspective, we need to be aware that new business prospects care about the quality of schools when determining where to locate. They understand that modern, well-maintained facilities provide students with access to advanced technology and equipment that will be important to the future quality of their workforce. Likewise, prospective new residents also make choices based on the quality of schools. Anyone who has ever moved from one community to another knows that part of the process involves evaluating which school district to move within. I know my family did when we chose Elida in 1994. With all the new school facilities now surrounding the Elida School District, what’s the chance of new residents making that same choice today? Exactly! We need to take action now.”