International Council on Systems Engineering and New Mexico Chapter Activity Executive Presentation 26-June-2015 for Paul D. Mann, SES Executive Director, U.S. Army White Sands Missile Range Presenter: Rick Dove President: INCOSE Enchantment Chapter New Mexico / El Paso Working Group Chair: Agile Systems and Systems Engineering Working Group Chair: Systems Security Engineering Adjunct Professor: Stevens Institute of Technology Sponsor: Thomas Tenorio Director at Large & Past President: INCOSE Enchantment Chapter Working Group Co-Chair: Autonomous Systems Test and Evaluation Senior Principal Systems Analyst: ATAMIR 1 Presenter & Sponsor BIOs Rick Dove is a Fellow of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), and an adjunct professor at Stevens Institute of Technology teaching graduate courses in agile systems and systems engineering. He founded and chairs the INCOSE working groups for Systems Security Engineering and for Agile Systems and Systems Engineering. He is the New Mexico Chapter president for 2015. He is CEO/CTO of Paradigm Shift International, specializing in agile systems and agile security R&D and education. As principle Investigator (PI) he has led agile self-organizing system security R&D on four US DHS and OSD funded projects. He was co-PI on the 1991 OSD funded Lehigh study that introduced the concepts of agile systems and enterprises, put the word agile into play, and led the subsequent DARPA-funded research and industry-collaborative working groups during the nineties that established basic system fundamentals for agile systems of all kinds. In 1990 he established and led the research agendas and industry-collaborative working group processes for The National Center for Manufacturing Science. He is author of Response Ability – The language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise (Wiley). He has a BSEE from Carnegie-Mellon University. Complete bio and publication list at: www.parshift.com/Files/PsiDocs/RkdBio.pdf Thomas Tenorio (tenoriot@gmail.com) is a Past President of the INCOSE Enchantment Chapter. He has over 30 years Systems Engineering experience supporting Test and Evaluation at White Sands Missile Range and the High Energy Systems Test Facility. He is currently employed by ATAMIR where he works as a Senior Principal Systems Analyst supporting tasking in the Systems Engineering G9 Directorate. Technical support areas include System of Systems, Unmanned and Autonomous Systems, real-time target control systems, decision architecture, and enterprise software development. He supports research and development related to large scale enterprise development of advanced services for Test Control in a mass collaboration environment involving both local and remote support capabilities. Focus areas include architecture frameworks for advanced decision making, hypernetworks, and complex systems engineering. Mr. Tenorio is an advocate for distributed communications and advanced Information Technology. He has worked for several Department of Defense contractors including GAN Corp, NCI, Rhino, Northrop, ATA, Lockheed, and BDM. He has a MS in Computer Science from NMSU and BBAs in Information Technology and Accounting from ENMU. 2 Meeting Introduction I would like to schedule a meeting with Mr. Mann regarding the INCOSE Enchantment Chapter, the regional representatives for the International Council on Systems Engineering. We have an upcoming International Symposium and are interested in determining how best to facilitate dialog and collaboration among Government and Industry representatives in the Region. We have been approached by the FAA regarding Technical Interchange Meetings with WSMR and other regional stakeholders. We are also interested in informing you further about INCOSE at both the international and regional level. I am enclosing one of our newsletters and providing links to our websites. As a former Enchantment Chapter president I would like to facilitate a meeting with our current Chapter President, Rick Dove. We also have representatives on the board from Sandia, Los Alamos, and Honeywell to name a few. In the past I was successful in doubling the size of the local ITEA conference by bringing in INCOSE representatives that included the INCOSE president and several national figures. I look forward to a meeting and further discussions. I would also like to discuss a possible presentation or webinar from you on the major System Engineering contributions you have been involved with. Thomas Tenorio 3 Purpose of Meeting Outreach exposure of INCOSE and the NM Chapter as a possible White Sands resource. Identification and discussion of mutual values for working together. We asked for this meeting because we sense mutual value in working together, and want to show you value in working with us. 4 Presentation Contents Chapter resources Chapter 2015 Mission and Goals Chapter 2015 meeting topics and speakers Chapter Newsletter Chapter Project Example: The Art of Systems Engineering Chapter-Member organizations INCOSE Mission and Resources INCOSE Corporate Advisory Board INCOSE Collaborative Working Groups INCOSE Project Example: Agile Systems Engineering Life Cycle Model workshops Mutual opportunity discussion 5 Chapter Resources Founded 2003 ~110 members from 30 organizations (June 2015) 10 monthly meetings with international SMEs, and recorded archives meetings in Albuquerque, recorded Web-broadcast for remote participation 11 monthly BOD planning meeting, 13 directors (2015) meetings in Albuquerque, recorded Web-broadcast for remote participation 2 tutorials with international SMEs, in the spring and fall 2 social networking events in the summer and winter Special topic collaborative-discovery workshops (new in 2015) Student Division chapter, University of Texas, El Paso, Satellite chapter-meeting groups: Directed Energy Directorate at the Phillips Research Site on Kirtland AFB Quarterly Newsletter publication with professional development articles Chapter website with archived meeting presentations, plus more material www.incose.org/enchantment 6 Chapter Mission and Goals Chapter Mission Provide professional development value to members. Chapter Reputation-Goals (achievement measured by member affirmation) • Recognized as the Regional Voice-of-SE Need: Community awareness of INCOSE and Chapter as valued resources. Intent: Effective member and Chapter involvement with regional organizations. • The Go-To Place for Professional Development Need: Local resource for meaningful SE professional development. Intent: Exposure to SME’s in the theory and practice of leading SE concepts. • Member Rewarding Activities Need: Opportunities for active engagement with Chapter resources. Intent: Member-attracting projects and workshops that engage members. • Reliable and Effective Chapter Need: Chapter strategic and operational effectiveness. Intent: Development and execution of goal-achievement Plans. 7 ConOps Activity Map of 2015 Chapter Plan 3: MemberRewarding Activities Provide Regional Interaction Facilitate Regional Interaction 1: Recognized as the Regional Voice-of-SE Ascertain Member Interests Ascertain Regional Interests 4: Reliable & Effective Chapter Provide In-Demand Talks/Tutorials Develop Annual Plans Review Execution Effectiveness 2: THE Professional Development Go-To Place Reputation Goals Activities Provide Facilitated Engagement Facilitate INCOSE WG Involvement Facilitate SEP Certification Bi-directional support lines show “key-only” activity-support. 8 Meeting Topics 2015 (recorded) Q1 Chapter Meetings • Jack Ring, Educe, Modeling Conceptual Design • Dr. Chris Scrapper, Navy, Evolutionary SE for Unmanned Systems at SpaWar • Andy Pickard, Rolls Royce, When “Yes” is the Wrong Answer Q2 Chapter Meetings • Dr. Cliff Whitcomb, Naval Post Graduate School, Design Thinking • Dr. Beth Wilson, Raytheon, NDIA Working Group Activities • Larri Rosser, Raytheon, SE Role in Agile Software Development • Tutorial: Dr. James Mason, Aerospace Corp, Systems Thinking Workshop Q3 Chapter Meetings • Sandia Tram Tour and Sandiago’s Restaurant, Summer Social • Dr. Dov Dorie, Technion/MIT, MBSE with Object-Process Methodology (OPM) • Rick Dove, Stevens Institute, Agile 104: Design Quality Q4 Chapter Meetings • Jennifer Maples, Phoenix Sky Harbor, Terminal 3 Modernization Project • Tutorial: Mathew Hause, PTC, Interface Management – From Theory to Modeling • El Pinto Restaurant, Albuquerque, Winter Social • Dr. Jimmie McEver, John Hopkins, Complex Systems WG and Primer Project 9 10 Example Project: The Art of Systems Engineering Need: Why is there no Julliard of systems engineering schools? Perhaps because we don’t understand the art of systems engineering; art of a quality that causes users to embrace engagement with the system, rather than having engagement be enforced by fiat, or entrapped by the lack of anything better. Intent: Systems with no learning burden for effective usage and eventual mastery, that facilitate user productivity and goal achievement, that fit comfortably with the stakeholder’s and system’s operating environment, that facilitate feature and capability evolution throughout the life cycle, and that are a joy to use. Mission: Discover architecting and design concepts and methods that will result in operationally embraceable systems. Objectives: Converge on a clear and defensible understanding of need, opportunity, and considerations with examples - for embraceable system design. Write a high-quality paper that establishes the art of system architecting and design as a subject of value to systems engineering, establishes worthiness of educational attention, and outlines a general set of architecting and design considerations for embraceable design. Method: Observe what works and why. Initially, two Fall 2105 ¾ day free workshops will review and analyze embraceable designs and the designer’s thinking for fundamental principles. Outcome: This initial work should be a catalyst for follow-on work. 11 Chapter-Member Organizations AECOM/URS (Holloman AFB) American Systems Applied Technology Associates Boeing Company CAG Booz Allen Hamilton Decysive Systems Eagle Summit Technology Associates EOSESS Honeywell L-3 Communications Lockheed Martin Los Alamos National Laboratory Management Sciences Marine Corps Systems Command National Radio Astronomy Observatory National Technical Systems NCI Information Systems (WSMR) Paradigm Shift International PTC Raytheon SAIC Sandia National Laboratories Sirius Requirements TechFlow Scientific University of Texas at El Paso US Air Force, Hanscomb AFB US Air Force, Kirtland AFB US Air Force, Research Lab US Air Force, Space Dev & Test Dir. Wagner Power Systems Highlight Southern NM: 11 members + UTEP students 12 INCOSE Mission and Resources Overview – The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) is a notfor-profit membership organization founded to develop and disseminate the interdisciplinary principles and practices that enable the realization of successful systems. Mission – Share, promote and advance the best of systems engineering from across the globe for the benefit of humanity and the planet. Vision – The world's authority on Systems Engineering. • • • • • • • • • • • • Founded 1990 ~10,000 members world-wide in 2015 87 Corporate Advisory Board (CAB) organizations 4-Day International Workshop Jan/Feb with ~40 working group workshops 4-day International Symposium Jun/July with papers, tutorials, workshops Vision 2025 – guiding the planning and priorities Certification: Professional Systems Engineer, training and exam Bi-monthly Systems Journal publication (Wiley) Quarterly practitioner-directed INSIGHT publication (Wiley) Monthly Webinars Systems Engineering Handbook Working Groups with missions and collaborative projects 13 INCOSE Collaborative Working Groups (June 2015) Affordability Agile Systems and Systems Eng. Anti-terrorism International Architecture Autonomous Systems Test and Eval Competency Complex Systems Cost Engineering Decision Analysis Defense Systems Enterprise Systems Global Earth Observation SoS (GEOSS) Human Systems Integration In-Service Systems Knowledge Management Lean Systems Engineering Life Cycle Management Measurement Model-based Conceptual Design Natural Systems Object-Oriented SE Method Power & Energy Systems Process Improvement Reliability Engineering Requirements Resilient Systems Risk Management Space Systems Systems Engineering Effectiveness System of Systems System Safety Integration Systems Science Systems Security Engineering Training Transportation 14 Corporate Advisory Board (June 2015) Charter of the CAB The Corporate Advisory Board (CAB) is the "Voice of the Corporate Customer" for INCOSE. CAB members provide: Guidance on overall INCOSE direction, focus, and priorities; A conduit between INCOSE and the sponsoring corporations for information exchange, key corporate systems engineering-related issues, and access to corporate executive management; and A bi-annual priority needs list and assessment of how well INCOSE is meeting those needs based on status inputs from the BoD and the Technical Board. All employees of a CAB member have electronic access to all INCOSE products, even for employees who are not individual INCOSE members. All employees of a CAB member pay discounted fees to become certified under the INCOSE Certified Systems Engineering Professional program. 15 CAB Members June 2015 Aerospace Corporation, The Airbus Defense and Space Airbus Group Alliant Techsystems AM General LLC Analytic Services ATKINS Autoliv Aviation Industry Corporation of China BAE Systems Bechtel Boeing Company Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. C.S. Draper Laboratory, Inc. Carnegie Mellon University SEI Cranfield University Defense Acquisition University Deloitte Engility Exelis Federal Aviation Administration (U.S.) Ford Motor Company General Dynamics General Electric George Mason University Georgia Institute of Technology Honeywell International Huntington Ingalls Industries IBM Corporation iTiD Consulting, Ltd Jet Propulsion Laboratory Johns Hopkins University KEIO University L-3 Communications Leidos Lockheed Martin Corporation Los Alamos National Laboratory ManTech International Corporation MAP systeme Massachusetts Institute of Technology Medtronic, Inc. Missouri University of Science & Technology MITRE Corporation, The Nanyang Technological University National Aeronautics and Space Admin National Reconnaissance Office National Security Agency Enterprise Systems National University of Singapore Naval Postgraduate School Nissan Motor Co, Ltd Northrop Grumman Corporation Nova Management, Inc PA Consulting Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Procter & Gamble Project Performance International PTC Raytheon Corporation Rockwell Collins, Inc. Rolls-Royce Saab AB Sandia National Laboratories Scitor Corporation Siemens Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc. Stellar Solutions Stevens Institute of Technology Swedish Defence Materiel Administration Systems Planning and Analysis Tetra Pak Thales TNO Technical Sciences UK MoD University of Arkansas University of Maryland University of Maryland, Baltimore County University of New South Wales, The, Canberra University of Southern California US Army ARDEC US Army TARDEC US Department of Defense Vencore Virginia Tech Vitech Corporation Volvo Construction Equipment Woodward Inc Worcester Polytechnic Institute- WPI 16 Example: INCOSE Agile-SE Priority Top Five INCOSE CAB Priorities: 1) SE Professional development 2) Agile/Expedited methods 3) Effective Trade Studies 4) Product lines, re-use 5) Better Value proposal for INCOSE and SE Proactive Proficiency INCOSE Vision 2025 Supporting Elements Resilient Systems Composable Design Adaptable and Scalable Methods Proactive Innovative/Composable Creates Opportunity Takes Preemptive Initiative Innovative (Composable) Agile Fragile Resilient Reactive Proficiency Reactive Resilient Seizes Opportunity Mitigates Adverse Events CAB: Corporate Advisory Board 17 Example Project: Agile Systems Engineering Life Cycle Model Fundamentals INCOSE-Proj-201401 Purpose – Provide necessary & sufficient principles for agile SE processes compatible with all agile SE practices, organizational cultures, SE community needs, and 15288 standards. Objectives – Discover generic principle-based life-cycle process activity necessary for effectiveness in uncertain, unpredictable, and evolving SE environments. – Create actionable knowledge and insight among Host participants. Scope – Cover a wide variety of agile SE process types. Method – 15 three-day workshops in US and Europe. – Analyze what works and why, then apply learning to a challenge. – Defense and Commercial Sectors with mixed HW/SW/WW* projects. – Analyze Host SE Process that dealt/deals with Uncertainty, Unpredictability, Risk, Variation, and Evolution. – Apply the action-learning to a Host challenge in need of more agility. – Facilitate Host participant knowledge & insight development, 2 Host participants must attend at least two additional Host workshops. *WW = Wet Ware, the stakeholders, customers, and people involved 18 20 ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288–2008 Processes Plus 2 from 15288-2015: Business/Mission Analysis and System Analysis Agreement Processes Organizational ProjectEnabling Processes Project Processes Acquisition Life Cycle Model Management Project Planning Verification Special Processes Stakeholder Requirements Definition Transition Project Assess and Control Tailoring Quality Management Decision Management Information Management Requirements Analysis Validation Human Resource Management Project Portfolio Management Infrastructure Management Configuration Management Technical Processes Supply Measurement Architectural Design Operation Risk Management Maintenance Implementation Integration Disposal 20-22 Processes of Interest 19 Asynchronous-Stage Agile SE-Life Cycle Model Systems and software engineering — Life cycle management — Part 1: Guide for life cycle management ISO/IEC TR 24748-1:2010(E) Research Use processes to observe and evaluate environmental evolution, and how that presents threat or opportunity Aug 05-07, SpaWar/MITRE in San Diego, CA Aug 24-26, Northrop Grumman in McLean, VA Retirement Concept Use processes to remove from use, dispose of & archive (sub) systems-of-interest Use processes to define & explore alternative solutions to meet a need Sep 21-25, Rockwell-Collins in Cedar Rapids, Iowa Support Oct xx-xx, Lockheed in Fort Worth, date TBD Use processes to maintain, supply and support system-of-interest Engage Agile SE LCM Criteria Nov xx-xx, Honeywell in Albuquerque, dates TBD White Sands dates TBD, analyze LVC, then Spectrum challenge Development Use processes to transform concepts and system requirements onto a documented, costed, producible prototype system-of-interest Utilization Production Use processes to operate, monitor and evolve system-of-interest, its services and infrastructure Use processes to produce and improve system-of-interest and evolve infrastructure 2016 schedule in planning now Seven asynchronously-invoked stages can be engaged repetitively and simultaneously to achieve benefit when engagement criteria are met 20 Notional Fundamentals: Agile Architecture Pattern System Response-Construction Kit Details in www.parshift.com/s/140630IS14-AgileSystemsEngineering-Part1&2.pdf Modules/Components Integrity Management Module mix evolution Gears/Pulleys Motors Wheels Structural Material Product System Eng. Module readiness Retail Distribution Process System assembly Owner/Builder Infrastructure evolution Tools Joiners, Axles, Small Parts Product Manager Active Infrastructure Passive Helicopter Plane Sockets Signals Security Safety Service Rules/Standards Mobile Radar Parts Interconnect Standards Control Protocol (None) Harm-Proofing Standards Process Rules & ConOps Radio Control Standards Reusable, Reconfigurable, Scalable 21 Potential Mutual Values For White Sands • Professional development of your System Engineers • Exposure to a diverse SE professional community: New Mexico & International • Access to SMEs for special interest topics, workshops, tutorials at White Sands • Leverage INCOSE Working Groups with focused project interest, e.g., T&E • Participation in collaborative-analysis workshops, eg, SpaWar Wave Model, Honeywell LVC, embraceable system design principles, et al. • Collaborate with other organizations with similar interests • A platform to galvanize broad-community progress in T&E , et al. • Chapter support and participation in mutual interests For the Chapter • Expand member professional development engagement opportunities • Membership-diversity exposure • Interest-diversity exposure • Experience-diversity exposure • Gain critical mass for pursuing topics of mutual interest 22 Opportunity Discussion SE professional development … Issues in T&E, autonomous systems, Spectrum, LVC, … Southern NM satellite monthly-meeting group … Other … 23