OLEDs: A bright opportunity for vacuum technology Paul E. Burrows PhD Energy Sciences and Technology Directorate Manager, Nanoscience and Technology Initiative Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Disclaimer: this is not the whole story… "Never try to tell everything you know. It may take too short a time." - Norman Ford • • • • • • What are they? A sense of history LED : OLED… key differences What we don’t understand, why it’s interesting Making OLEDs: Large area and manufacturing The lure of plastic The organic “zoo”: Phylum Small molecule Polymer 6/19/03 Dendrimer This lecture will mostly focus on these 4 Class: “Small Molecule” Organics 6/19/03 5 The History of Manufacturing 1. Stone Age 2. Micro-Stone Age Intel 4004 3. Molecular Age Why OLEDs are not LEDs Inorganic LEDs (e.g. InGaN) Crystalline, epitaxial OLEDs Amorphous, flexible, weak adhesion, structural complexity p,n-doping Generally can be either p- or n-doped with substitutional dopant atoms at 1015 – 1020/cm3 Materials are either electron or hole conducting. Negligible background charge carrier density. Electronic doping requires 1 – 5% loading and chemically changes the host molecules mobility up to ~ 1000 cm2/Vs Holes: 10-3 cm2/Vs Electrons: 0 – 10-4 cm2/Vs voltage and field dependent excited states Electronic: light generated by band-to-band recombination, weakly bound excitons, weak exciton-phonon coupling Excitonic: correlated e--h+ pairs conduction bands meaningless, strongly bound excitons, strong exciton-phonon coupling W. Helfrich & W.G. Sneider Phys. Rev. Lett. 14(7), 229 (1965) 1000V 5 mm Anthracene (C14H10) electrode + - electrode J. Dresner, RCA Rev. 30, 322 (1969) 100-1000V 50 mm Anthracene (C14H10) 8% external quantum efficiency Thin gold + electrode - Ag Paste electrode C.W. Tang, U.S. Patent # 4,356,429 (1980) Cathode Electron transporter 100 nm Hole transporter Transparent conductor Light • • Vacuum deposition enabled thin electron transport layer Hole transport layer was spin-coated polymer: 10 – 20 V, 15cd/m2 brightness • • All vacuum device: 10 – 20 V, 100 cd/m2 using Alq3 emission layer C.W. Tang and S.A. VanSlyke Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 913(1987) OLED products available: Kodak LS633 Camera 2.2 inch, 512x218 OLED screen, ~ $500 (in partnership with Sanyo) Not yet available in USA Optrex Instrument Cluster BMW 7 series $85,000 (car included) Not shown: Philips OLEDequipped electric shaver OLEDs: The Future… Kodak/Sanyo active-matrix display features full-color, 1280 x 720 (HDTV) resolution Sony: 13 inches,800 x 600, low temperature poly-silicon TFT active matrix using organic phosphorescence Not shown: Toshiba 17inch AM OLED with resolution of 1280 x 768 pixels. Complexity of Molecular Systems There has been an alarming increase in the number of things we don’t understand… Why we need more research! The effects of traps… MOTIVATION: Correlate current conduction w/ molecular structure Trap Charge Limited Interface Limited Injection Burrows, et al, J. Appl. Phys. (1996) 79, 7991 Baldo & Forrest Phys Rev. B. (2001), 64, 085201 LUMO LUMO EF EF Trap distribution Metal Organic Metal Organic Interfacial Dipole layer Distance • • • Assumes bulk effects limit current conduction Assumes trap energies are exponentially distributed below LUMO Neglects voltage and temperature dependence of mobility (secondary to trap effects) Distance • • Assumes charge separation at the metalorganic interface, which creates dipole layer Assumes dipolar disorder in the bulk Both models only fitted to Alq3 data Are extracted parameters meaningful? Alq3 – Do we know what we have? C1 Higher symmetry More polar (m ~ 7D vs. 5.3D) Higher energy (4.7kcal/mol) mer-Alq3 Trap state for electron ? (Curioni et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. (1998) 294, 263) Int erc on v ers i on ? fac-Alq3 C3 Several polymorphic phases, all involve p-p interactions of mer enantiomeric pairs Brinkman, et al., JACS, 122, 5147 (2000) Braun, et al, J. Chem. Phys. (2001) 114, 9625. Amati & Lelj, Chem. Phys. Lett. (2002) 358, 144 Degrees of Freedom: Dynamical Motions for AlQ3 Single frame Overlaid Trajectory Frames • Dynamical trajectory shows quinolate ring motion about Al coordination 6/19/03 18 Organic Electroluminescence 1. 2.6 eV Excitons formed from combination of electrons and holes transparent anode electrons 2.7 eV trap states a-NPD holes low work function cathode exciton Alq3 5.7eV 6.0 eV - + host molecules (charge transport material) dopant molecule (luminescent dye) 2. Excitons transfer to luminescent dye Why it’s important to put the right spin on your excitons: Optical excitation is spin-conserved – a spin zero ground state produces a spin zero excited state which can vertically relax back to the ground state with unit quantum efficiency Electrical excitation is spin-random –Simple statistics 25% singlets, 75% high spin triplet state (vertical recombination to ground state “forbidden”) –e-h correlation may change this ratio –some evidence of > 25% singlets in polymers –remains a controversial area Fluorescence singlet excited state triplet excited state Phosphorescence triplet exciton FLUORESCENCE ground state (singlet) PHOSPHORESCENCE singlet exciton symmetry conserved triplet to ground state transition is not permitted fast process ~10-9s slow process ~ 1s From fluorescence towards phosphorescence Collect all the singlets and triplets: 100% efficiency kDD S1 S1 ISC through spin-orbit coupling Z5 Et Et N T1 Et T1 Et N Pt N Et Et N kD Et S0 S0 kDD : Et dipole-dipole (Forster) long range 1/R 6 N Ir kD : Dexter transfer, short range exp(- r) R Baldo et al., Nature 395, 151 (1998), Susuki et al. APL 69 224 (1996) El in benzophenone at 100 K. 3 R = F, OMe, ... Phosphorescent molecules enable triplet state recombination N C C Ir O O O N S Ir N O Ir N S Ir N Ir N PL eff. = 0.35 = 4 msec (77K) max = 525 nm Heavy metal ion causes spinorbit coupling with organic ligand Symmetry broken allowed phosphorescent recombination Color tuning by ligand choice M.E. Thompson University of Southern California PL eff. = 0.4 = 2 msec max = 555 nm PL eff. = 0.05 = 2 msec max = 590 nm PL eff. = 0.2 = 2 msec max = 605 nm Phosphorescent OLED Status* 1931 CIE chart 0.57, 0.43 0.61, 0.38 0.30, 0.63 0.65, 0.35 0.16, 0.37 ++ 0.70, 0.30 0.15, 0.22 0.14, 0.23 *Subset of PHOLEDs Courtesy Universal Display Corporation PhOLED Technology (Phosphorescent OLED) Courtesy Universal Display Corporation PHOLED Xxxxxx Color CIE (x, y) Luminous Efficiency (cd/A) at 1 mA/cm 2 Luminance (cd/m 2) at 1 mA/cm 2 Lifetime (hours) 0.65, 0.35 0.61, 0.38 0.30, 0.65 0.14, 0.37 0.14, 0.23 12 22 24 16 10 6 lm/W 14 lm/W no data 120 220 240 160 100 15,000 @ 300 cd/m 2 > 10,000 @ 300 cd/m 2 13,000 @ 600 cd/m 2 800 @ 600 cd/m2* * * Under development White PHOLEDs • CIE = (0.37, 0.40), CRI = 83 • 31,000 cd/m2 at 14V US patents: 6,303,238 • 6.4 lm/W 6,097,147 Breaking news: lower voltage structures further improve power efficiencies by 20 – 50% What is the limit of the possible? 20% of the light from a simple OLED escapes a planar device Existing: Outcoupling x5: Voltage decrease, ÷ 2 possible 14 lm/W green at 250 cd/m2 70 lm/W 140 lm/W This assumes no further increase in quantum efficiency! Manufacture and Scale-Up Assembling OLEDs at PNNL System by Angstrom Engineering Inc. Andrew Bass et al. 4” substrate, organic deposition (thermal), oxides (sputtering), metal (thermal) People are serious about OLED! Large area? Kodak thermal deposition Society for Information Display Annual Meeting 2002 Alternative: OVPD, The R&D Concept Multiple Zone Heater Source 1 (Host) Cooled Substrate Carrier Source 2 (Dopant) Sublimation Transport Condensation Gas Phase Transport by Inert Carrier Gas, ~ 1 Torr "Low Pressure Organic Vapor Phase Deposition of Small Molecular Weight Organic Light Emitting Device Structures.“ Appl. Phys Lett. 71, 3033 (1997) Courtesy Universal Display Corporation OVPD scaleup vs thermal evaporation Substrate Close Coupled Showerhead Shadow Mask Substrate • Highly efficient deposition • Gas phase controlled • No bowing of shadow mask • Inefficient deposition (wall coating) • Temperature controlled • Bowing of shadow mask Courtesy Universal Display Corporation What about plastic? Tensioner OLED Deposition Supply Roll Encapsulation Patterning - Web-based processing - Cost-effectiveness Product Roll So… What’s the problem? Photos: Courtesy of Dupont Displays U.S. Patent No. 5,844,363 Photo: Courtesy of Universal Display Corporation Degradation of Organic Devices Oxide H2O, O2 Light Rigid OLED Architecture: Glass Pioneer Patent EP 0 776 147 A1 OLED layers ITO Stainless steel can Epoxy adhesive membrane desiccant Typical lifetimes 5k – 100k hours Blue is generally the least stable Flexible (FOLED) Architecture: Flexible moisture barrier substrate Flexible thin film encapsulation -6 10 -4 -2 0 PNB, Arton PET (hardcoat) Barix™ Organic Coatings OLED Requirement PECVD Inorganic Coatings Limit of MOCON measurement 2 10 10 10 10 H2O Permeation Rate (g/m2/day at 25ºC) 4 10 Multilayer Barrier Deposition: Monomer Liquid Cure Ceramic Deposition PET High Speed, Large Area… Normalized luminance [arb. units] Irppy-based OLED: PET substrate, glass lid Constant current, DC drive 1 L0 = 400 cd/m2 0.8 0.6 (i) (ii) 0.4 1200 hr 0.2 3000 hr 0 0 500 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2929 (2002) 2 mm pixel 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Time [hours] ITO/CuPc(10nm)/NPD(30nm)/CBP:Irppy[6%](30nm)/BAlq(10nm)/Alq 3(40nm)/LiF(1nm)/Al(100nm) PNNL Rollcoating • 7” web • 2 monomer sources • 3 inorganic sources • UV, ebeam or plasma cure • Polymer evaporation • Composite extrusion • Oxide deposition Latest Flexible Display Results: 2000 hours at L0 = 600 cd/m2 for green phosphorescent OLED display on plastic (passive matrix 128 x 64) (A. Chwang et al. Materials Research Society Conference, April 2003 Collaboration between Universal Display Corporation, Pacific Northwest National Laboratories and Vitex Systems Inc.) Opportunities and Challenges (by way of conclusion) Flat Panel Displays: $70B worldwide market OLEDS: $2B by 2006 (by some estimates) Next Generation Lighting Practical if we can reach 50 lm/W 22% of US electricity generation goes for lighting Luminescent wallpaper? Dual or multi use windows using transparent OLEDs? Lifetime, particularly in blue Large area scale-up at very high yield and low cost Commercial scale-up… production lines with minimal downtime Supply infrastructure?? Materials purity assay etc. Still insufficient understanding of basic material structure-property relationships