Engineering Economic Analysis - 8th Edition.

advertisement
Chapter 7 - Rate of
Return Analysis
Click here for Streaming Audio To
Accompany Presentation (optional)
EGR 403 Capital Allocation Theory
Dr. Phillip R. Rosenkrantz
Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Department
Cal Poly Pomona
EGR 403 - The Big Picture
• Framework: Accounting & Breakeven Analysis
• “Time-value of money” concepts - Ch. 3, 4
• Analysis methods
–
–
–
–
Ch. 5 - Present Worth
Ch. 6 - Annual Worth
Ch. 7, 8 - Rate of Return (incremental analysis)
Ch. 9 - Benefit Cost Ratio & other techniques
• Refining the analysis
– Ch. 10, 11 - Depreciation & Taxes
– Ch. 12 - Replacement Analysis
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
2
Three Major Methods of
Economic Analysis
• PW - Present Worth
• AW - Annual Worth
• IRR - Internal Rate of Return
If P = A(P/A, i, n)
Then (P/A, i, n) = P/A
Solve for (P/A, i, n) and look up
interest in Compound Interest Tables
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
3
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• The interest rate paid on the unpaid balance of a
loan such that the payment schedule makes the
unpaid loan balance equal to zero when the final
payment is made. Ex: P = $5000, i = 10%, n = 5
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
Principal Prin. Paid
5000.00
818.99
4181.01
900.89
3280.13
990.97
2289.15 1090.07
1199.08 1199.08
0.00
Int Paid
500.00
418.10
328.01
228.92
119.91
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
Payment
1318.99
1318.99
1318.99
1318.99
1318.99
0.00
4
Calculating Rate of Return
• The IRR is the interest rate at which the
benefits equal the costs. IRR = i*
PW Benefit - PW Cost = 0
PW Benefit/PW Cost = 1
NPW = 0
EUAB - EUAC = 0
PW Benefit = PW Cost
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
5
Calculating IRR - Example 7-1
• PWB/PWC = 1
• 2000(P/A, i, 5)/8200 = 1
• (P/A, i, 5) = 8200/2000 =
4.1
• From Table, IRR =
7%
From Compound Interest Tables
Interest rate
(P/A,i,5)
6%
7%
8%
4.212
4.100
3.993
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
6
Calculating IRR - Example 7-2
Sometimes we have more than one factor in our equation.
When that happens we cannot solve for just one factor.
If we use: EUAB - EUAC = 0
100 + 75(A/G, i, 4) - 700(A/P, i, 4) = 0
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
7
Calculating IRR - Example 7-2 (cont’d)
• No direct method for calculating. Use trial and error
and iterate to get answer.
• Try i = 5%:
100 + 75(A/G, 5%, 4) - 700(A/P, 5%, 4) = + 11
+ 11 is too high. The interest rate was too low
• Try i = 8%
100 + 75(A/G, 8%, 4) - 700(A/P, 8%, 4) = - 6
- 6 is too low. The interest rate was too high
• Try i = 7%
100 + 75(A/G, 8%, 4) - 700(A/P, 8%, 4) = 0
Therefore IRR = 7%
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
8
Calculating IRR - Example 7-3
• Example 7-3 shows a series of cash flows that does not match any
of our known patterns. We must use trial and error.
• Using NPW = 0, suppose we start with i = 10% . NPW = + 10.16,
which is too high.
• Using i = 15%, NPW = - 4.02. IRR is between 10% & 15%
• The iterations may be graphed and the true IRR will be indicated
at the point where the NPW curve = 0.
Yr CF
0 - 100
1 + 20
2 + 20
3 + 30
4 + 40
5 + 40
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
9
Calculating IRR - Example 7-3 (Cont’d)
• We can use linear interpolation to find estimate
the point where the curve crosses 0.
• IRR = i* = 10% + (15%-10%)[10.16/(10.16 +
4.02)] = 13.5%
• This is a linear interpolation of a non-linear
function so the answer is slightly inaccurate,
but good enough for decision making here
(after all, the guesswork in our future cash
flows introduces uncertainty in the analysis).
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
10
Calculating IRR - Example 7-3 (Cont’d)
• To get an exact answer, we can use the IRR function in EXCEL
• Select the IRR function from the fx icon.
• Block the column on the spreadsheet that has the cash flows for
all years.
• The function returns the IRR.
-100
20
30
20
40
40
13.47% =IRR(A1:A6)
The IRR function in
EXCEL allows you to
evaluate the return of
investments very easily
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
11
Calculating IRR for a Bond - Example 7-4a
Bond Costs and Benefits:
Purchase price = $1000
Dividends = $40 every six months
Sold after one year for $950
Calculation of Periodic interest rate & IRR:
m = 2 compounding periods/year
1000 = 40(P/A, i, 2) + 950(P/F, i, 2)
By trial and error and interpolation i*  1.5%
IRR Nominal rate = 2 x 0.015 = 0.03 (3%)
IRR Effective rate = (1 + 0.015)2 - 1 = 0.0302 (3.02%)
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
12
Example 7-4a EXCEL Solution
• Use IRR function to find periodic IRR (i)
• Find nominal using r = i * m
• Use EFFECT function to find effective interest rate
Period
0
1
2
Buy/sell Dividend
-1000
40
950
40
Total
-1000
40
990
1.52%
3.04%
3.06%
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
periodic
nominal
effective
13
Rate Of Return (ROR) Analysis
• Most frequently used measure of merit in
industry.
• More accurately called Internal Rate of
Return (IRR).
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
14
Calculating ROR
• Where two mutually exclusive alternatives will
provide the same benefit, ROR is performed using an
incremental rate of return (DROR) on the difference
between the alternatives.
• You cannot simply choose the higher IRR alternative.
Two-alternative
situation
Decision
DROR  MARR
Choose higher-cost
alternative
DROR < MARR
Choose lower-cost
alternative
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
15
The Minimum Attractive Rate of
Return (MARR)
• The MARR is a minimum return the
company will accept on the money it invests
• The MARR is usually calculated by
financial analysts in the company and
provided to those who evaluate projects
• It is the same as the interest rate used for
Present Worth and Annual Worth analysis.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
16
ROR on Alternatives With Equivalent Benefits
Example 7-5: Consider the lease vs. buy situation. MARR = 10%
• Leasco: Lease for five years for 3 annual payments of $1000 each
• Saleco: Purchase up front for $2783
• Both alternatives have a $1200/year benefit for 5 years
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
IRR/period
Cash flow - Cash flow - Cash flow alternative alternative alternative
A (Leaseco) B (Saleco)
B-A
-$1,000.00
$200.00
$200.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
-$2,783.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
-$1,783.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
48.72%
32.60%
8.01%
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
17
Example 7-5 (Cont’d)
• Cannot simply pick the highest IRR if alternatives have
different investment costs
• Must examine the incremental cash flows!!
• Subtract the cash flows for the “Lower First Cost”
alternative from the cash flows of the “Higher First Cost”
alternative to obtain the “Incremental Cash Flow” or D.
• Compute the IRR on the incremental cash flow. This is
the DROR.
• For this problem the DROR is 8.01% which is <
MARR, therefore choose the lower cost alternative.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
18
Example 7-5 (Cont’d)
• Q. Why did we do this?
• A. Both alternatives were acceptable compared only to
the MARR. Since either alternative will work, the
question is whether we want to spend the additional
$1783 to go from the lower cost to the higher cost
alternative. The benefit for doing so is the savings of
two years of $1000 lease payments. Essentially we are
getting an 8.01% return on that $1783 investment. The
company can get 10% ROR on its money elsewhere, so
reject the increment. That is, spend $1000 now on
Leaseco and invest the other $1783 for a higher return.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
19
Analysis Period
• Just as in PW and AW analysis the analysis period
must be considered:
– Useful life of the alternative equals the analysis period.
– Alternatives have useful lives different from the
analysis period.
– The analysis period is infinite, n = .
For an example of that uses a
common multiple of the
alternate service lives, see
Example 7-10. EXCEL would
be useful here because of the
irregularity of the cash flows.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9
7-10
20
Download