UNIVERSIDAD DE ESPECIALIDADES ESPÍRITU SANTO
FACULTAD DE ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES
SYLLABUS
ENGLISH VERSION
FOR DAC 11 VER 12 03 09
SUBJECT: Development & Eval of Proj 2
FACULTY: James Keeley, PhD
CONTACT HOURS: 48
YEAR: 2010
DAYS: Monday – Thursday
ROOM: F209
CODE: UGER 381
CREDITS: 3
NON CONTACT HOURS: 96
PERIOD:WINTER(Jan 11-Mar 6)
SCHEDULE: 7:30-8:55am
SYLLABUS DATE: Dec 2009
1. COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course teaches all the academic theory of the evaluation, development and
management of projects (part ii). It covers topics such as project development,
product development, life cycle, handling resources, management, risks and
contingencies, earned value projects, advanced work breakdown structure, project
research and development and project team skills. It uses case methodology to
explain and historic examples of complex projects to analyze. Technology projects
are emphasized.
2. JUSTIFICATION
This course enables students to identify, analyze and understand the specific
processes involved in the development and sustainment of business, social and
governmental projects on both large and small scales. This allows students a
better appreciation of the elements involved with project planning, delivery,
sustainability and evaluation.
3. OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this course are to provide a comprehensive examination of
project evaluation and design. The student will be introduced to evaluation
technique and schemata through summative, formative, process, and outcomes
evaluation methods. Exposure to the various methods of project evaluation and
design will allow the student to gain comprehensive insight into methodologies
involved within the scope of program evaluation, design and assessment.
a. GENERAL
The student will gain insight into the value of a properly planned program
design, evaluation and final assessment through the classroom activities.
b. SPECIFIC
During each class session, the student will identify key terminology and
concepts associated with program design and evaluation. Additionally, the
student will demonstrate, define and apply their understanding of program
design and evaluation through the rudimentary construction of a program
evaluation scheme. The student is responsible for 3.125 hours of daily
reading outside of class (non-contact hours) for each class period during the
term.
After completion of the course, students will be able to:
1. Explain common components related to project planning;
2. Explain the salient components related to project implementation;
3. Explain various methods of evaluating projects as on-going and
completed.
4. COMPETENCIES
This course will allow the student to use basic problem solving techniques in order
to solve project management issues as they arise; make appropriate decisions
based on the requirements of the task and allow for recognition of organizational
structure and policy to guide strategic thinking skills in order to complete a project
within established time and fiscal parameters.
5. COURSE CONTENT OUTLINE
Class
Meeting #
Competencies
1
Monday
Jan 11
↑
CONTENT
Introduction and Overview
HOMEWORK
(96 HRS.)
Kerzner,
Chapter 2
p. 35-52
Newell (2002)
pages 1-44
2
Tuesday
Jan 12
The student
defines the
salient
characteristics
of a project and
explains the
need for project
management
Formative Evaluation
Technique
Newell (2002)
pages 46-75
Formative Evaluation
Technique, Continued
3
Wednesday
Jan 13
↓
6
Tuesday
Jan 19
Kerzner
Chapter 2
p. 69-86
Newell (2002)
pages 77-102
↑
Summative Evaluation
Technique
Kerzner
Chapter 4
p. 139-146
The student
describes the
various
mechanisms
for evaluation
↓
Summative Evaluation
Technique, Continued
Kerzner
Chap 4
p. 146-163
↑
Developing Outcome
Measures
Kerzner
Chap 4
p. 163-190
4
Thursday
Jan 14
5
Monday
Jan 18
Kerzner
Chapter 2
p. 52-69
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Explores the
various
components
related to all
phases of project
planning and
implementation
Identifies salient
characteristics of
program
evaluation and
individual
assessment
Matches the
program
evaluation type to
the appropriate
program
Determines how
program
evaluation is
used in program
planning
Determines how
program
evaluation is
used during the
life of the project
Illustrates the use
of a logic model
7
Wednesday
Jan 20
The student
develops a
work
breakdown
structure using
established
tools and
techniques to
achieve stated
project
objectives,
measures and
indicators
Developing Outcome
Measures, Continued
Kerzner
Chap 5
p. 207-223
Develops project
indicators
measurable by a
% and/or #
Constructing Indicators
Kerzner
Chap 5
p. 223-239
Measures project
indicators for
project efficiency
↓
↑
Discriminates
between service
“needs” and
service “wants”
Newell (2002)
through effective
pages 104-130
evaluation and
assessment
Identifying Indicators
8
Thursday
Jan 21
9
Monday
Jan 25
Kerzner
Chap 5
p. 191-207
EXAM 1
10
Tuesday
Jan 26
The student
11
utilizes earnedWednesday value concepts
Jan 27
for project
milestone
control
12
Thurs
Jan 28
13
Monday
Feb 1
Impact Evaluation
Kerzner
Chap 5
p. 239-258
Unintended
Consequences
Control Variables
Kerzner
Chap 7
p. 258-299
Explores issues
related to
problems that
were not planned
for
Control Variables
Kerzner
Chap 7
p. 299-307
Examines
variables that
impact the project
timeline
Demonstrates
knowledge
related to
milestone
achievement and
planning for
contingencies
Calculates and
interprets data
related to project
research
↓
Mid-Term Examination
14
Tuesday
Feb 2
↑
15
Wednesday
Feb 3
Demonstrates
knowledge
related to
assessment
through
indicators
Estimates project
actual versus real
milestone
achievement
Qualitative Evaluation
Methods
Kerzner
Chap 20
p. 831-841
Qualitative Evaluation
Methods, Continued
16
Thursday
Feb 4
Quantitative Evaluation
Methods
17
Monday
Feb 8
18
Tuesday
Feb 9
The student
analyzes
optimal labor
utilization for
cost
effectiveness
and labor
utilization
through
statistical
analysis
Quantitative Evaluation
Methods, Continued
Kerzner
Chap 20
p. 841-851
Control Issues
Kerzner
Chap 20
p. 851-862
19
Wednesday
Feb 10
Control Issues, Continued
20
Thursday
Feb 11
↑
25
Wednesday
Calculates and
interprets data
related to project
attainment
Calculates and
interprets data
related to project
outcomes using
statistical
analysis
Calculates and
interprets data
related to project
outcomes using
statistical
analysis
Defines salient
control issues
and discusses
how they impact
the project
Defines salient
control issues
and discusses
how they impact
the project
Identifies the
components of a
project matrix
Review for Exam 3
Review for
exam 3
Exam 3
Test of
Knowledge
Utilization and Cost
Analysis
Kerzner
Chap 20
p. 862-870
Demonstrates
knowledge
related to data
analysis and
interpretation
Analyzes an
actual project
budget
Empirical Data and
Testing Methods
Kerzner
Chap 20
p. 870-883
Determines the
best method of
project evaluation
Empirical Data and
Testing Methods,
Continued
In-Class
Handout
Determines the
best method of
project evaluation
22
Thursday
Feb 18
24
Tuesday
Feb 23
Newell (2002)
pages 132-161
In-Class
Handout
↓
21
Wednesday
Feb 17
23
Monday
Feb 22
In-Class Hand
out
Feb 24
26
Thursday
Feb 25
27
Monday
Mar 1
The student
defines the
elements of
project quality
management
and applies
them to the
final project
reporting
feature
Reporting the Results
Newell (2002)
pages 165-179
In-Class
Handout
Reporting the Results,
Continued
Newell (2002)
pages 181-193
In-Class
Handout
Newell (2002)
pages 195-210
Case Study Analysis
28
Tuesday
Mar 2
Newell (2002)
pages 211-216
↓
29
Wednesday
Mar 3
30
Thursday
Mar 4
Case Study Analysis,
Review for Final Exam
Test of
Knowledge
None
In-Class
Handout
Final exam
Grade Review and
Distribution
In-Class
Handout
Newell (2002)
pages 233-316
None
using a real
project
Communicates
the results in a
formal report
format
Communicates
the results in a
formal report
format
Recognizes
issues related to
project success
Identifies
constraint areas
in project
planning
Demonstrates
knowledge
related to all
phases of project
planning and
implementation
6. METHODOLOGY
This is a lecture-based course that will require continuous student attendance.
Student knowledge and competencies will be evaluated through daily class
participation, question-and-answer sessions and examination through authentic
assessment i.e., demonstrating what has been learned.
Note that students CANNOT make-up missed work through class absence.
Students are highly encouraged to maintain a consistent presence during all
scheduled class times.
7. EVALUATION
The student will be assessed through daily participation and evaluation by written
work and testing. By the conclusion of this class the student will be able to
recognize and identify key objectives and will be able to fundamentally apply what
was learned based upon the information given in this bi-mester of instruction.
7.1 Assessment Criteria
Completion and knowledge of the assigned course readings,
Two in-class examinations,
Two out-of-class examinations,
Consistent use of electronic media,
Completion of assigned homework
Classroom participation
7.2 Performance Markers









Identifies the difference between program evaluation and
research,
Explains the salient characteristics of program evaluation and
individual assessment,
Determines how program evaluation is used in program
planning,
Discriminates between service “needs” and service “wants”
through effective evaluation and assessment,
Identifies and determine the informational needs of program
managers through evaluation and assessment methodology,
Manipulates target data and collection technique to answer
evaluation questions,
Matches the type of data collected to the needs of the program,
Designs and perform appropriate evaluations,
Communicates quantitative and qualitative information to
evaluation consumers.
7.3 Weighting
Unit Exams
Homework
50%
50%
8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
8.1 REQUIRED
MAIN TEXTBOOK(s):
Newell, M. (2002). Preparing for the project management professional
certification exam, 2nd Edition. This textbook is free and on line at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/533186/Education-Preparing-for-the-ProjectManagement-Professional-PMP-Exam-2nd-Edition
Kerzner, H. Project management – A systems approach to planning, scheduling
and controlling. Newport Press, CA.
Chapter 2
p. 35 – 86
Chapter 4
p. 139 – 190
Chapter 5
p. 191 – 258
Chapter 7
p. 289 – 307
Chapter 20 p. 831 – 883
8.2 COMPLEMENTARY
TBA
8.3 HANDOUTS:
TBA
8.4 WEBLIOGRAPHY:
This website is comprehensive in nature that includes many links to other
relevant evaluation and assessment sites:
http://www.cdc.gov/eval/resources.htm
EBSCO DATABASE at:
http://search.ebscohost.com/
The Project Management Center:
http://www.infogoal.com/pmc/pmchome.htm
The International Research Network on Organizaing by Projects:
http://www.irnop.org/
E-Project Central:
http://www.eprojectcentral.com/
The Three Little Pigs Project:
http://www.eng.uwo.ca/research/ttlpp/overview.htm
The Woody 2000 Project:
http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/woody2000/intro.htm
9. FACULTY INFORMATION
NAME:
James W. Keeley, PhD
drjwkeeley@yahoo.com
jkeeley@uees.edu.ec
ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS:
B.A.A.S Bachelors of Arts and Sciences, Dallas Baptist University
GRADUATE:
M.Ed. Master of Education, Dallas Baptist University
M.B.A. Master of Business Administration, Colorado Tech
Ph.D. Doctor of Philosophy, Touro University International
Prepared by: James W. Keeley, PhD
Date: Dec. 6, 2009,
Reviewed by: Dean Monica Reynoso
Date: December, 2010