Who would succeed? Finding a successor to Lenin was never going to be easy. He had played a unique role in holding the party together and giving it direction after the revolution. There was a real possibility that in-fighting and division could pull the Communist party apart. For five years after 1924, a power struggle took place in the USSR. The person who emerged as the victor of this struggle was Joseph Stalin. We need to examine how this happened and why Stalin was able to defeat his opponents. If one man was to dominate Russia on Lenin’s death, he would probably emerge from the members of the Politburo in 1924. In retrospect, it is clear that the contest for the leadership of the Communist Party was really between Trotsky and Stalin. But this was not apparent at the time. At first, Stalin was regarded as a minor player, with the chief contenders being Trotsky on the one hand and Zinoviev and Kamenev on the other. Also, in the early stages the power struggle was more about stopping others from getting to the top rather than trying to come out on top oneself. It is useful to place the contenders for party leadership in terms of their political position in the party of 1924. There was a clear split between the radical left wing led by Trotsky and the right wing headed by Bukharin. The majority of the party members lay somewhere in between. Stalin fell into this group. ACTIVITY Stage 1 From the List below, choose the six most important qualities/characteristics that you think would have been advantageous for a leader in the USSR to have in 1924. You can add one other of your own choice not on the list. Good Marxist theoretician, who could take over Lenin’s mantle Good orator Capacity for organisation Decisiveness Capacity for action Able to melt into the background Boring and dull Good at carrying out routine tasks Good at doing paperwork, a good bureaucrat Unwavering loyalty to the party Clear vision of the way to socialism and prepared to take on party members that did not share this vision An important player in the Revolution of 1917 Somebody everybody could accept because he did not have strong views Good in discussion and debate Popular with the party Able to work with other leading party figures Able to be ruthless Good writer