Agenda Friday 09:00 AM – 4:00 PM 12:00 PM – 10:00 PM 03:15 PM – 04:30 PM 04:00 PM – 04:30 PM 05:00 PM – 06:30 PM 07:00 PM – 10:00 PM 10:00 PM – 01:00 AM Saturday 06:00 AM – 11:00 AM 08:00 AM – 11:30 AM 10:00 AM – 03:00 PM 11:30 AM – 01:00 PM 01:00 PM – 04:00 PM 05:15 PM – 06:15 PM 07:00 PM – 10:00 PM 10:00 PM – 01:00 AM Sunday 06:00 AM – 12:00 PM 09:00 AM – 03:00 PM High School Team Design Competition at U of O (Colonel By Hall) Registration at the Quality Hotel Parliamentary Debate Judging Debriefing at the Quality Hotel Judging Debriefing at Le Rendez-Vous Opening Ceremonies at Le Rendez-Vous Competition at Congress Centre After hours at the Nox (on Campus) Breakfast at Biggs (in the Quality Hotel) OEC – CIO Competition (Congress Centre) Career Fair (Congress Centre) Lunch at the Hard Rock Café (in the Market) OEC – CIO Competition (Congress Centre) Final Parliamentary Debate (Congress Centre) Awards Banquet (Congress Centre) After hours at Hartwell’s Breakfast at Biggs (in the Quality Hotel) Checkout at the Quality Hotel OEC – CIO executive committee meeting at the Quality Hotel A note from the Organizing Committee A welcome message from the Dean The Ontario Engineering Competition 2002 is finally upon us. Welcome to the University of Ottawa and the 22nd Ontario Engineering Competition! It looks like the level of competition at the 22nd annual OEC – CIO will be both challenging and rewarding. This year’s competition boasts over 180 competitors from ten (10) universities and 40 competitors from ten (10) high schools. Only a handful of venues like the OEC – CIO will offer you the chance to compete against and interact with the best of the best. Professionals from industry, government and academia will witness your hard work and success. Let us not forget about the networking opportunity of a lifetime. At the OEC – CIO, you are given the chance to showcase your talents to Ontario’s finest in the Engineering community. Past competitors will attest to the fact that the Ontario Engineering Competition was one of the best experiences of their university career. OEC brings together many of the best and the brightest engineering students across Ontario to show what engineering is really about: innovation, teamwork and responsibility towards society. You should all be very proud of yourselves, as participants, organizers, judges or sponsors. As participants, you will make it happen. As organizers, you invested many long hours in what will remain with you as an unrivalled learning experience. As judges and sponsors, your generosity with your time and contributions make this experience possible. To all those who helped bring about this incredible showcase of engineering.. a big thank you! T. Aboulnasr, Ph.D., FEIC, P.Eng. Dean of Engineering, University of Ottawa Our organizing committee wishes to thank you for all of your hard work and preparation required to compete and wish you the best of luck… both at the OEC – CIO 2002 and beyond. OEC – CIO 2002 Organizing Committee University of Ottawa OEC – CIO 2002 Page 2 of 22 List of Judges Corporate Design Explanatory Communications Phil Apperly, MDRobotics Pheonia Camacho, Bell Canada Douglas R. Hatfield, Dupont Steve Parsons, Bruce Power Peter Schmidt Rebecca Shipman, Bell Canada Meredyth Brown, Budd Ross Carnwith, Bell Nexxia Mélanie Drouin, NAV CANADA Nicholas Gagliardo, Bell Canada Alex Gill, Ontario Society of Professional Engineers Peter Scott, Bell Canada Ted Treuil, MetaSolv Software Inc. Editorial Communications Parliamentary Debate Pat Carnwith, Bell Canada J. Philippe Déziel, Algonquin College Camila Duarte, Golder Associates John Kisaz Kelly Krumreich, BCE James J. Yang, Bell Canada Duncan Blachford Brennan Brazeau Anick Chiasson, Tourbe de Pigeon Hill Mike Ford, GM Motors of Canada Kiza Francis, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission John Gamble, Consulting Engineers of Ontario Russel Holmes City of Ottawa David A. Johnson, University of Waterloo Cliff Knox, Sanmina-SCI Phil Nguyen Virendra Sahni, City of Ottawa My Le Thi, Bell Canada Entrepreneurial Design Miranda Kong, Industry Canada Augustine Kwok, Bell Canada Jason Lukez, Budd Canada Rashmi Patnaik, Bell Canada Arnold Rosen, IBM Canada Ltd Mohamed Zaid * head judges are identified by bolded text OEC – CIO 2002 Team Design Marie Carter Dominic Dupuis, Bell Canada Navroz Jivraj, Bell Canada Alastair Malarky, COM DEV Christina Van Drunen, AECL Henry Wong, Catena Network Page 3 of 22 aecl OEC – CIO 2002 Page 4 of 22 List of Participants Carleton University Royal Military College of Canada Dawn Borutskie, Stacy Carkner, Jeff Corace, Andrew Csizmar, Chris Donaldson, Matthew Hamilton, Raymond Harris, Zahra Khan, Ming Lee, Kris Macpherson, Christie Maddock, Said Mohamed, Jeevithan Muttulingam, Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Rasem, Julia Retson, Brendon Simons James Barr, Mark Boogaart, Chris Bryan, Allan Ferriss, Maciej Hatta, Lara Jennings, Lars Kornmacher, Sean Leithead, Nicholas Pernal, Anne Sawhney, Jesse Van Eijk, Matthew Zalot Ryerson University University of Guelph Rob Battiston, Michael Carl, Michael Hutchison, Debanjan Mookerjea, Graham Nasby, Stephen Ruddy, Michael Shannon, Kristen Strahlendorf Ronesh Puri, Akash Kadam, Andrew Kittmer, Chris Lawrence, Michael Maciejewski, Evan Martin, Emilijan Mirceski, Craig Mock, Daniel Stergiou, Roman Trochanowski, Stephen Webster McMaster University University of Toronto Marta Bailey, Jennifer Quirt Michael Brougham, Simona Cara, Miranda Cheung, Matt Cousens, Piyanka Dilaware, Frederic Dupuis, Daryl Edwards, Krystal Godri, David Hou, Jamie Jarema, Jim Karahalios, Ellie Kim, Carrie Lau, Jamy Li, Isaac Li, Adrienne Lovink, Paresh Maisuria, Rebecca Marnoch, Zach Martin, Katherine Martineau, Geoff Masotti, Vesna Nikolic, Ben Parayankuzhiyil, Mark Polkinghorne, Lee Priest, Jamil Sawani, Aziz Shariff, Liviu Tancau, Eric Tang, Jackey Wong, Roshan Yoyanathan, Jane Zhang University of Ottawa Christopher Askwith, Soraya Bailey, Hesilda Discua, Emily Duthie, Lucy Edgerton, Charles Huston, Esther Lacasse-Joyal, Eric Lanteigne, Sacha Levandusky, Georges Nabaa Queen's University Crystal Bewza, Grant Bishop, Dave Bradwell, Andrew Carryer, Su-Eong Cheah, Vanessa Davis, Kyra Hillier, Ahmed Kayssi, Christopher Kleberg, Kunal Lodhia, Carmen Leung, Vincent Man, Reuben Mathew, Grant Moenting, James Orr, Alex Rubinshteyn, Adam Rysanek, Michael Sutherland, Olivia Sze, Ming Tsui, Loughlin Tuck, Tom Woodhall University of Waterloo Jeff Alfonsi, Stuart Baxter, Christopher Blake, Theresa Cooke, Jay Detsky, David Johnson, Arthur Law, Yin-Chun Ling, Sabrina Mu, Ian MacKenzie, Christina MacNeil, Alex Matan, Michael Kadour, Laura Naismith, Terry Pardys, Doug Regehr, Derek Satnik, Peter Schretlen, Hang Tan, Ian Tien, Fei Wang University of Western Ontario Jennifer DeLude, Andrea Black, Ryan Elliot, Darryl Cowan, Jonathan Tracey, Kevin Dolishny, Paul Marconi, Chris Scullion, Elena Alonso, Scott Abercrombie, Joe Barfett, Anthony Mandarino, Asier Ania, Scott Martin, Melissa Fallis, Sean Kennedy, Mitchell Fong, Sam Tabbara, Nicole Persaud, Nazanin Hakimzadeh, David Gatey, Meng Fu, Arthur Wirski, Jordan Davidson, Jennifer Nesbitt, Shawn Gettler OEC – CIO 2002 Page 5 of 22 opg ad OEC – CIO 2002 Page 6 of 22 Corporate Design Corporate Design Schedule Head Judge – Steve Parsons, Bruce Power Friday, February 22nd, 2002: Goal The goal of the Corporate Design Category is to encourage undergraduate engineering students to use their ingenuity and education to tackle a genuine problem faced by practicing engineers in their daily work. In industry, the engineer is responsible to investigate problems and design cost effective solutions. In this category, competitors must analyze and design a solution to a problem faced by a recognized corporation operating in Canada. Winning entries will combine originality, technical and economic feasibility, and a high quality presentation and exhibit. Time 7:30 PM 8:30 PM 9:15 PM Title Presenter(s) Judges circulate the room to evaluate displays and ask questions. Project Hermes: Hang Tan, Ian Tien Centralized Information University of Waterloo System Notification Services Design of Mustard Protein Adrienne Lovink, Jamie Jarema, Isolation Mustard Facility Rebecca Marnoch, Piyanka Dilawari University of Toronto Saturday, February 23rd, 2002: Awards The Ontario Power Generation Award and a $3,500 cash prize will be awarded to the first place team. Cash prizes of $2,500 and $1,500 will be awarded to the second and third place teams respectively. Time 8:00 AM Title Extraction of nickel from Laterite Ores 8:50 AM Judging The most important aspects of evaluation are depth of understanding of the topic, a creative solution, technical and economic feasibility, effective communication, and the quality of the presentation. The depth of the team's understanding of the topic will be assessed during the question period. In order to be considered for an award in this category the team must convince the judges that the design is viable and will work if implemented. The marking scheme for the Corporate Design Category is as follows: Interfacing on Anemometer with Windows 9:40 AM 10:00 AM 10:50 AM 11:40 AM 1:10 PM 2:00 PM Technical Depth and Accuracy Meeting the Corporation's Need Economic Feasibility Originality Prototype or Model OEC – CIO 2002 20 percent 20 percent 15 percent 15 percent 10 percent Portable Sign Post Computer Assisted Shoulder Arthroplasty for Humeral Head Fractures Increasing the Efficiency of Cam Driven Bar Machines Completion of W12A Presenter(s) Katherine Martineau, Ben Parayankuzhiyil, Miranda Cheung, Simona Cara University of Toronto Alex Rubinshteyn, Loughlin Tuck Queen’s University Break Esther Lacasse-Joyal, Eric Lanteigne University of Ottawa Jennifer DeLude, Andrea Black University of Western Ontario Lunch Mark Polkinghorne, Lee Priest, Jackey Wong University of Toronto Paul Marconi, Kevin Dolishny, Jon Tracey, Darryl Cowan University of Western Ontario 20-minute presentation followed by a 10-minute question period. Each design display must be personned during all other presentation times. Page 7 of 22 bell add OEC – CIO 2002 Page 8 of 22 Editorial Communications Editorial Communications Schedule Head Judge – Pat Carnwith, Bell Canada Friday, February 22nd, 2002: Goal The goal of the Editorial Communications Category is to encourage undergraduate engineering students to present a viewpoint on the social, economic, and / or environmental impact of any current technological issue. Engineers are often required to investigate an issue, form a viewpoint, and then convince others of their opinion. In this category, competitors must identify a technological issue, form an opinion and present a convincing, well-supported argument. Winning entries will combine thorough research, a convincing viewpoint, and a dynamic presentation. Awards The Bell Canada Award and a $2,000 cash prize will be awarded to the first place team. Cash prizes of $1,500 and $750 will be awarded to the second and third place teams respectively. Judging The most important aspects of evaluation in this category are depth of understanding of the topic, formation and delivery of a convincing viewpoint, effective communication, and the quality of the presentation. The depth of the team's understanding of the topic will be assessed during the question period. The marking scheme for the Editorial Communications Category is as follows: Delivery of Viewpoint Research Depth and Accuracy Presentation Technical Complexity Use of Audio-Visual Aids Interest Generated OEC – CIO 2002 25 percent 20 percent 20 percent 15 percent 10 percent 10 percent Time 7:30 PM Title Artificial Intelligence 8:30 PM Pardon me! Did you say noise pollution? Presenter(s) Asier Ania University of Western Ontario Kristen Strahlendorf University of Guelph Saturday, February 23rd, 2002: Time 8:30 AM 9:30 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:45 AM 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM Title Nanotechnology: Inventing the Future Technology in the Classroom Bioengineered Products and GMO's Are Your Children Safe Online? Debunking the Myths of Internet Filters The Alienation of Engineering Bioethanol - A Clean Convenient and Environmentally Friendly Solution Presenter(s) Laura Naismith University of Waterloo Dawn Borutskie Carleton University Break Georges Nabaa University of Ottawa Lunch Theresa Cooke University of Waterloo Kyra Hillier, Reuben Mathew Queen’s University Break Scott Martin, Melissa Fallis University of Western Ontario 30-minute presentation followed by a 20-minute question period. Page 9 of 22 world heart ad OEC – CIO 2002 Page 10 of 22 Entrepreneurial Design Entrepreneurial Design Schedule Head Judge – Arnold Rosen, IBM Canada Ltd Friday, February 22nd, 2002: Goal The goal of the Entrepreneurial Design Category is to encourage undergraduate engineering students to utilize their creativity and education to develop a new product or service. Engineers often develop innovative new designs that benefit society and generate economic returns. In this category, competitors must design a marketable product or service not currently available. Winning entries will combine originality, technical and economic feasibility, a solid marketing plan, and a high quality presentation and exhibit. Time 7:30 PM Awards The Entrepreneurial Design Award and a $3,500 cash prize will be awarded to the first place team. Cash prizes of $2,500 and $1,500 will be awarded to the second and third place teams respectively. Judging The most important aspects of evaluation in this category are depth of understanding of the topic, technical and economic feasibility, a solid marketing plan, effective communication, and the quality of the presentation. The depth of the team's understanding of the topic will be assessed during the question period. In order to be considered for an award in this category the team must convince the judges that the design is viable and will work if implemented. The marking scheme for the Entrepreneurial Design Category is as follows: Technical Depth and Accuracy 20 percent Marketability 20 percent Presentation and Exhibit 20 percent Economic Feasibility 15 percent Originality 15 percent Prototype or Model 10 percent Note : Competitors will be assessed a penalty for not presenting on time. OEC – CIO 2002 8:30 PM Title iSight: A Low-Cost Vision Aid Adaptive Image Compressor Presenter(s) Peter Schretlen, Theresa Cooke University of Waterloo Emilijan Mirceski Ryerson Polytechnic University Saturday, February 23rd, 2002: Time 8:30 AM Title Space Determinator 9:15 AM The Backup 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 11:00 AM 11:45 AM 1:30 PM 2:15 PM Industrial Production of Fullerenes XIACT: A Voice Controlled Robot The Wave of the Future: Optical Intersatellite Link Adjustable Trouser Cuffs Presenter(s) Olivia Sze, Carmen Leung, Vincent Man, Ming Tsui Queen’s University Sacha Levandusky University of Ottawa Break Chris Scullion, Joe Barfett, Anthony Mandarino, Scott Abercrombie University of Western Ontario Stuart Baxter, Terry Pardys, Doug Regehr, Derek Satnik University of Waterloo Lunch Christie Maddock , Kris Macpherson , Raymond Harris, Andrew Csizmar Carleton University Roshan Yoyanathan, Jamil Sawani, Paresh Maisuria, Aziz Shariff University of Toronto 20-minute presentation followed by a 10-minute question period. Each design display must be personned during all other presentation times. Page 11 of 22 ospe OEC – CIO 2002 Page 12 of 22 Explanatory Communications Explanatory Communications Schedule Head Judge – Meredyth Brown, Budd Friday, February 22nd, 2002: Goal The goal of the Explanatory Communications Category is to encourage undergraduate engineering students to present a complicated technical process or issue in terms that a person outside of their discipline can understand. Often, engineers must explain highly specialized subjects to people with different educational backgrounds such as management, other professionals, or the general public. In this category, competitors must thoroughly yet clearly explain a technical subject to an audience not specializing in their field. Winning entries will combine thorough research, a complete and clear explanation, and a dynamic presentation. Time 7:30 PM Awards The Ontario Society of Professional Engineers Award and a $2,000 cash prize will be awarded to the first place team. Cash prizes of $1,500 and $750 will be awarded to the second and third place teams respectively. Judging The most important aspects of evaluation in this category are depth of understanding of the topic, delivery of a complete and clear explanation, effective communication, and the quality of the presentation. The depth of the team's understanding of the topic will be assessed during the question period. The marking scheme for the Explanatory Communications Category is as follows: Explanation of Concept Research Depth and Accuracy Presentation Technical Complexity Use of Audio-Visual Aids Interest Generated OEC – CIO 2002 25 percent 20 percent 20 percent 15 percent 10 percent 10 percent Title Fundamentals of Voice Recognition Technology: Theory and Implementation Sysmeas Program for Acoustical Modelling of Muffler Systems 8:30 PM Presenter(s) Michael Brougham, Vesna Nikolic University of Toronto Jay Detsky University of Waterloo Saturday, February 23rd, 2002: Time 4:10 PM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:45 AM 11:45 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:10 PM Title Presenter(s) Advanced Composite Materials in Anthony Mandarino Civil Engineering University of Western Ontario Break Project Hermes: Centralized Ian Tien Information System Notification University of Waterloo Services Arthur Law University of Waterloo Lunch Microencapsulation: A Ahmed Kayssi Technology with Limitless Queen’s University Potential Dynamics of Internal Combustion Esther Lacasse-Joyal Engines University of Ottawa Break Thermodynamics of Power Andrew Carryer Generation Queen’s University 30-minute presentation followed by a 20-minute question period. Page 13 of 22 sff - ceo ad OEC – CIO 2002 Page 14 of 22 Parliamentary Debate Parliamentary Debate Schedule Head Judge – John Gamble, Consulting Engineers of Ontario Round Flight R1 R1 A B Goal The goal of the Parliamentary Debate Category is to encourage undergraduate engineering students to present a well-reasoned viewpoint with a minimum of preparation time. Engineers are often required to evaluate and argue for or against a proposal on short notice. In this category, competitors defend or refute a previously undisclosed resolution using the format of parliamentary style debate. Awards The Silver Tongue Award and a $1,500 cash prize, jointly sponsored by the Sandford Fleming Foundation and Consulting Engineers of Ontario, will be awarded to the winner of the final debate and a cash prize of $1,000 will be awarded to the runner up. A cash prize of $500 each will be awarded to the two debate finalists eliminated after the semi-final round. Judging The most important aspects of evaluation in this category are argument and evidence, refutation, organization and analysis, delivery, and ingenuity and wit. Particular attention is given to the summaries presented at the end of the debate. Each speaker on the team is graded out of a total of fifty (50) points for a combined maximum total of one hundred (100) points. In the event of a tie, the debate is awarded to the Government. The team scores will remain confidential. The marking scheme for the Parliamentary Debate Category is as follows: Argument and Evidence Refutation Organization and Analysis Delivery Ingenuity and Wit OEC – CIO 2002 10 points 10 points 10 points 10 points 10 points Round Flight R2 R2 A B R3 R3 A B R4 R4 A B Day Initial Parings: 7:30 PM Friday Friday Day Round 2 Pairings: 8:15 PM Saturday Saturday Round 3 Pairings: 10:00 AM Saturday Saturday Round 4 Pairings: 1:30 PM Saturday Saturday Debater’s Briefing: Semi-Final Announcement: Semi-Finals: Finals: Time 7:45 PM 8:30 PM Time 8:30 AM 9:15 AM 10:15 AM 11:00 AM 1:45 PM 2:30 PM Friday 6:00 PM – Debating Rooms Saturday, 3:15 PM Saturday, 3:30 PM Saturday, 5:15 PM Teams: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Marta Bailey, Jennifer Quirt McMaster University Graham Nasby, Rob Battiston University of Guelph Michael Kadour, Alex Matan University of Waterloo Stacy Carkner, Julia Retson Carleton University Brendan Simons, Jeff Corace Carleton University Mitchell Fong, Sam Tabbara University of Western Ontario Sean Kennedy, Elena Alonso University of Western Ontario 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Crystal Bewza, Grant Bishop Queen’s University Dave Bradwell, Tom Woodhall Queen’s University Ashley Morton, Crystal Wong University of Toronto Nicholas Pernal, Allan Ferriss Royal Military College of Canada Anne Sawhney, Matt Zalot Royal Military College of Canada Michael Maciejewski, Ronesh Puri Ryerson Polytechnic University Chris Askwith, Charles Huston University of Ottawa Page 15 of 22 com dev OEC – CIO 2002 Page 16 of 22 Team Design Team Design Schedule Head Judge – Alastair Malarky, COM DEV Saturday, February 23rd, 2002: Goal The goal of the Team Design Category is to encourage undergraduate engineering students to produce a feasible design despite limited materials and preparation time. Engineers are often required to think quickly to produce a working solution given limited resources. In this category, competitors combine teamwork and problem solving skills to design, construct, test, and present a previously undisclosed project. 7:30 AM 11:30 AM 12:30 PM Awards The COM DEV Award and a $1,500 cash prize will be awarded to the first place team. Cash prizes of $1,000 and $500 will be awarded to the second and third place teams respectively. Judging The most important aspects of evaluation in this category are the design and performance, teamwork, and the quality of the presentation. The marking scheme for the Team Design Category is as follows: Design and Performance Teamwork Presentation Originality OEC – CIO 2002 40 percent 25 percent 20 percent 15 percent – – – 11:30 AM 12:30 PM 4:30 PM Presentation and construction of design problem Lunch at the Hard Rock Café in the Byward Market Team Design Presentations 10-minute presentation followed by a 5-minute question period. Teams: 1 Christopher Blake, Yin-Chun (Vincent) Ling, Ian MacKenzie, Christina MacNeil University of Waterloo 9 David Hou, Ellie Kim, Carrie Lau, Jane Zhang University of Toronto 2 Jeff Alfonsi, David Johnson, Sabrina Mu, Fei (Kevin) Wang University of Waterloo 10 Grant Moenting, Michale Sutherland, James Orr, Christopher Kleberg Queen’s University 3 Hesilda Discua, Soraya Bailey, Hani Jabbour, Lucy Edgerton University of Ottawa 11 Su-Eong Cheah, Adam Rysanek, Vanessa Davis, Kunal Lodhia Queen’s University 4 Abdul Rahman, Ming Lee, Said Mohamed, Jeevithon Muttulingam Carleton University 12 Stephen Webster, Daniel Stergiou, Roman Trochanowski, Emilijan Mirceski Ryerson Polytechnic University 5 Chris Donaldson, Matthew Hamilton, Ahmad Rasem, Zahra Khan Carleton University 13 Craig Mock, Chris Lawrence, Evan Martin, Andrew Kittmer Ryerson Polytechnic University 6 Nicole Persaud, Nazanin Hakimzadeh, David Gatey, Meng Fu University of Western Ontario 14 Stephen Ruddy, Michael Hutchison, Michael Shannon, Michael Carl University of Guelph 7 Arthur Wirski, Jordan Davidson, Shawn Gettler, Jennifer Nesbitt University of Western Ontario 15 Jesse Van Eyke, James Barr, Lars Kornmacher, Chris Bryan Royal Military College of Canada 8 Jamy Li, Liviu Tancau, Isaac Li, Frederic Dupuis University of Toronto 16 Maciej Hatta, Mark Boogaart, Lara Jennings, Sean Leithead Royal Military College of Canada Page 17 of 22 smart and biggar OEC – CIO 2002 Page 18 of 22 High School Competition High School Schedule Head Judge – Annette Truax, ESSCO Friday, February 22nd, 2002: Goal The High School Competition is not an official category in the Ontario Engineering Competition. The demonstration is held during OEC and the General Rules in Section 1.0 do not apply to this section. 9:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM The goal of the High School Competition is to encourage high school students to gain exposure to engineers, engineering students, and attend the Ontario Engineering Competition. This competition is a simplified version of Team Design that challenges high school students to produce a feasible design despite limited materials and preparation time. Engineers are often required to think quickly to produce a working solution given limited resources. In this competition, competitors combine teamwork and problem solving skills to design, construct, test, and present a previously undisclosed project. Teams: Awards The Engineering Student Society Council of Ontario (ESSCO) Award will be awarded to the first place team. Judging The most important aspects of evaluation in this category are the design and performance, teamwork, and the quality of the presentation. The marking scheme for the High School Competition is as follows: Design and Performance Teamwork Presentation Originality OEC – CIO 2002 40 percent 25 percent 20 percent 15 percent – – – 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 4:00 PM Presentation and construction of design problem Lunch Team Design Presentations 10-minute presentation followed by a 5-minute question period. 1 Brent DiBartolo, David Catana, Darryl Tam, Krysia Zurakowski St Pius X High School 5 David Milar, Andrew Weatherall, Jow Comen, Tim Derkatch South Carleton High School 2 Tadeau Fantaneanu, Guillaume Dorais, Alexie Halpin, Falco Mueller-Fischler Lycée Claudel 6 Sascha Adler, Ryan Davies, Sebastian Peleato, Kathrine Rive Ashbury College 3 Todd Burges, Anthony Reid, Clark Ciprik, Oleg Seminuck St. Catharines Collegiate 7 Arthur Chan, Margaret Natynczyk, Rajeev Roy, Jonathan Tien Ashbury College 4 Matt Rossiter, Kyle Jordon, Andrew Bergeron, Tyler Marghetis Mother Teresa High School 8 Alex Tomkins, Ashwin Juneja, Bill Sommers, Mike Boos Gloucester Hgh School 9 Samir Raza, Jay Peterson, Megan Cartright, Abu Koul Gloucester High School 10 Leif Faulk, Rob Effinger, Derek To, Mike Gow Jacob Hespeler Secondary School Page 19 of 22 Enbridge nrc OEC – CIO 2002 Page 20 of 22 Our sponsors … The following companies helped make this year’s Ontario Engineering Competition a true success. Thank you. Patrons Enbridge National Research Council of Canada Canadian Forces Recruiting Centre Sustaining Major Patrons Contributors Bell Canada COM DEV International Consulting Engineers of Ontario Ontario Power Generation Ontario Society of Professional Engineers Sandford Fleming Foundation Major Patrons Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Faculty of Engineering (University of Ottawa) Smart & Biggar World Heart Corporation OEC – CIO 2002 Golder Associates Nortel Networks Mr. Luc Lussier NSERC - CRSNG Med-Eng Systems Optenia Ottawa Citizen Pratt and Whitney University of Toronto University of Waterloo Donors ASHRAE Ottawa Valley Chapter Carleton University Leduc Bus Lines Ltd. Lakehead University Lockheed Martin McMaster University Mrs Grete Hale Reid Eddison Ryerson Polytechnic University U of O IEEE Student Branch Page 21 of 22 Organizing Committee A special thanks to … Our committee worked hard to achieve what it has. The continued success of the Ontario Engineering Committee in 2002 is thanks in part to the following individuals. The Ontario Engineering Competition is an wonderful opportunity to become quite familiar with the Faculty of Engineering, and our committee would like to thank the following individuals for their generous support this year’s event. Executive We are extremely thankful for their efforts. Co-Chair Karla DiBartolo Co-Chair Chris Workman Hospitality Marc Meunier Category Michael Loken Communications Camille Drouin Finance Andy Pan Judges Wendy Stewart Volunteers Pascal St-Jean Logistics Student Advisor Philippe Levesque Andrew Forward Directors Team Design Corporate Design Entrepreneurial Design Parliamentary Debate Explanatory Communications Editorial Communications OEC – CIO 2002 Dr. Tyseer Aboulnasr Ms. Debborah Evraire Dr. Atef E.F. Fahim Dr. Mike B. Munro Mr. Ric Cuthbertson Mrs. Joanne Benoit Mrs. Line Campeau Mrs. Silvana Gandolfini Mrs. Rita Gour Desnoyers Richard Pomerleau GOOD LUCK! Jacob Gurnick Paul Marion Matt Keen André Whittingham Joycelyn Martin Page 22 of 22