SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Introduction Contract Management is the process that ensures that all parties to a contract fully understand their obligations enabling these to be fulfilled as efficiently and effectively as possible to provide better services that are effective and efficient in delivery, are value for money, provide good quality, perform well and are policy compliant. The process of contract management process has two key themes or objectives: The management of the relationship between provider and purchaser (in this case the provider can be defined as the organisation who has been awarded a contract to deliver a support service; the purchaser can be defined as the Local Authority who award the contracts) Identification, allocation and management of the risks associated with the quality, efficiency and performance of the contract. Benefits The benefits to effective contract management are immense for both purchaser and contractor. Good contract management can ensure cost effective, reliable and timely services will be provided at an agreed price and a level of quality consistent with a purchaser’s requirements. Contract management also ensures that legal standards, financial probity and management accountability are adhered to whilst maintaining good customer relationships Value for Money Value for money has been integral to how Salford Supporting People has commissioned services to deliver housing related support since April 2003 and will continue to be an integral aspect of contract management. Successful contract management relies on a combination of many factors but the over-riding principle is to achieve “value for money” which is most likely to be achieved by: Accurate assessment of the service requirement Good supplier selection procedures with clear output based specification Well specified contracts Planned, active relationship management Clear roles and responsibilities Appropriate user behaviour Reduction and control of risk Monitoring the contract’s performance and effectiveness Retention of departmental control Management of change Encouragement of continuous improvement in price, quality and service Management of performance shortfalls, proper cost and payment control SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Scope The principles of contract management will apply to service contracts and is particularly relevant when a contract has: A high value; Is for two or more years; Is critical to the business; Has a significant number of customers Terminology A contract is an agreement between two parties under which one party promises to do something for the other in return for a consideration usually a payment. This places obligations on both parties to fulfill their part of the agreement. It is also the foundation for the relationship between the parties. The contract manager is the person who leads the contract management team. The user is the customer, the person or people who receive the service. The supplier is the contractor. The authority is the purchaser and can include all departments of the Council. Contract Management Concept The contract management cycle (Fig.1) is a way of keeping the contract alive. The activities at each stage are summarised below. Pro-active management takes place throughout the contract cycle, which will be adopted by the Salford Supporting People contracts team. Fig.1 Typical Contract Management Cycle: Identifying need Setting direction Preparation and procurement Transition and handover Contact service review Pro-active management SP Management Cycle SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Setting the Direction Successful contract management of the supplier / provider relationship requires a thorough understanding of The contract management environment The risks and selection of the appropriate style of contract management. The contract management environment and risks should be assessed early in the cycle and kept under review. They will have a fundamental effect on the contract and the management style adopted. Depending on the circumstances, these analyses may be sophisticated or informal but should be documented to enable the assumptions used and conclusions reached to be checked and provide an audit trail. All aspects of contract management should be undertaken against this background and resources devoted to the areas of greatest benefit. Contract Management Environment Issues for consideration Tendency towards partnership Tendency towards distant relationship Service type Business critical Non-core support Benefits / success factors Business improvement Cost saving only Agreement type Shared benefits Fixed price Agreement duration Long term Short term Nature of relationship Developing trust, continuing Formal, arms length Stability of requirement Liable to change Performance measurement Difficult to identify and assess Fixed throughout Easy to measure, unambiguous to quantify Assessing Risk A realistic assessment of risk (ongoing) is key to the contract management process. The level of risk associated with an individual contract will depend on the type and length of contract, the stability of the service, conditions in the supply market and risk to the user in terms of cost, quality and the impact of contract failure. There are five elements to risk assessment, which we will adopt, implement and evaluate on an ongoing basis throughout a contracts full life: Identify potential problems and their causes Assess the probability of occurrence Assess the impact on the department’s operation and standing Identify which party is best able to manage the risk Devise strategies to manage down the risk. It is important to check the limitations of the information on which the risk assessment is based. The extent of the information sought and used should be proportional to the risk. The effort required to manage each risk needs to be considered against the benefits. SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? During the procurement process for example assessment of the risks will enable appropriate procedures to be set up, contract management resources to be appropriately focused and the degree of risk for the user and the provider to be established. If the provider is expected to bear all the risks the contract price may increase. Each risk should be allocated to whichever party is best able to manage it or to bear the consequences if such risk were to materialize. During the contract execution phase the aim is to manage down the risks, reducing both the likelihood and the consequences. The Contract Management Triangle The range of responsibilities of those involved in contract management is considerable, depending on the particular contract and management structure. Some are concerned with the whole process, others with particular aspects. The use of cross-functional teams comprising of contract management teams, users and suppliers / providers is common and recommended for strategic service contracts. It is important to define the exact roles and responsibilities of each party. The roles of each party depend on the particular service concerned, the user organisation and the nature of the contract. The policies and procedures adopted should reflect these roles. The contract management style may need to change during the life of the contract. The style should be reviewed regularly particularly after the initial phase and prior to the end of the contract. There are no hard and fast rules to determine which style is correct and different styles will be used in different combinations to match circumstances. Contract Management Styles Partnership Most likely to bring long-term success. Appropriate when flexibility is required. Collaborative working to meet shared aims, shared risk assessment, possible shared responsibility for risk management Significant information sharing Open book arrangements Reduced purchasing costs, increased supplier profits Adversarial Appropriate during negotiation or when serious or persistent poor performance. Confrontational user /supplier relationship Parties assess own risks Your risk – your problem Information protected One party gains at expense of other Hands Off Hands On Particularly appropriate for multi-user services where management act in a coordination role and there is no predominant user. Empowerment of the supplier to take action Monitoring by overall objectives framework or by exception Measuring by clear performance indicators. Appropriate when contract manager is being used as a filter to control user demands or in instances of poor performance. Labour intensive management Key decisions taken by contract manager Supplier being directed. SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Contract Management Styles CONT… Passive Appropriate for stable situations meeting existing needs. Basic monitoring of the supplier in terms of quality reliability and costs Reporting to senior management Open Appropriate for contracts in a changing environment or where business critical Full disclosure of information and ideas about both service provision and management Potential full cost disclosure by supplier Potential full budget disclosure by contract Open book accounting Proactive Appropriate for large, high profile, business critical services. Anticipating and responding to change Implementing improvements, increasing quality, reducing costs Developing close relationships with the supplier Formal Appropriate for stable service, not fundamental to the business or where business critical Reluctance by parties to disclose cost or budget information Not a close relationship (not necessarily management adversarial). Multi-Level Single Level Large, complex contracts Relationship which operates at more than one level and maybe across more than one contract Smaller simple contracts Relationship largely or exclusively at one level and with only one major interface Equity & Probity All concerned have a duty in respect of maintaining confidential information and handling sensitive situations with integrity. All parties under the contract must handle information with equity whether in-house or externally contracted. It is an offence for local authority officers in their official capacity to accept any money gifts or other considerations when managing or negotiating contracts. Roles & Responsibilities While the actual roles for a particular service need to be agreed between the parties and have the support of senior management, the following information gives a generic guide as to the division of responsibilities, when managing a contract. (See section six for more specific clarity divisions of responsibilities of the Salford Supporting People Contracts Team). Contract Management Team Team members need to be appointed early in order to maximize the value of their roles (The Salford Supporting People Department has a dedicated contracts team in place, whose role it is to manage, evaluate and appraise the contracts we have with contractors. Roles most relevant during the preparation and procurement phase include: SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Development and enforcement of policy Planning and implementation of contract management approach Establishment of the roles and responsibilities of those involved Authority to incur the expenditure Identification of key risk elements Setting standards across the department Development and monitoring of procedures Post-tender negotiations (if acceptable under the EC rules). Roles most relevant during contract implementation include: Acting as a filter between the user and the provider Analyzing information Monitoring prices and volumes, especially where the user has direct access to the services Auditing of the provider as specified in the contract Authorizing invoices for payment and ensuring that payments are made Anticipating problems Reviewing and Appraising the contract Analyzing and managing risk Managing budgets Participating in post contract negotiations Implementing procedures and monitoring implementation of supplier procedures. Senior Management Role: Three distinct roles need to be fulfilled, preferably by different individuals. There should be no ambiguity of their roles and when dealing with the supplier a joint view needs to be presented. Their titles and roles are: Decision Maker – EG: SUPPORTING PEOPLE Commissioning Body Approval of the need for the service Approval of the contract budget Approval of variations to the contract Appointment of the Contract Owner Reporting to this level will be occasional and by exception. Contract Owner – EG: SUPPORTING PEOPLE Core Strategy Group Accountable for delivering the service requirements within the given approvals Requires the status and authority to provide the necessary leadership. Contract Sponsor – EG: SUPPORTING PEOPLE Lead Officer / Contract Manager The single focal point for the day-to-day management of the departments interest SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Contractor (EG - Provider of services) The extent to which the contractor is empowered will depend upon the procurement approach adopted. However, the contractor / provider will always be responsible for: Deciding how to provide the service Delivering the service to specification Deciding priorities to achieve the service Meeting user requirements within the contract terms and budget Monitoring the service delivery performance Development and implementation of agreed procedures Providing information as required by the contract. User (EG - Service User) The user will be fully involved in: Defining exactly what services are to be provided Setting service levels Providing relevant and timely information to the contract manager and contractor Informing the contract management of under performance. When there are many users of a service, consideration should be given to setting up user groups. These groups should add value, promote inclusion and steer how services should be shaped for future demand. Relationships No matter how good the contract and the definition of the roles, the service provision will depend upon the relationships between those involved. The relationships need to be established early (during the procurement process), constantly reviewed and actively managed. Relationships can be flexible and open while maintaining proper businesslike and professional conduct. A balance needs to be maintained between these, consistent with the overall style of contract management adopted. Good procedures help to establish this balance and encourage mutual trust between the parties. In general adversarial relationships are less likely to be productive. Formal links need to be set between those in the contract management triangle and should be designed to ensure accurate and timely information is in the hands of those responsible for any resulting actions, corrections or improvements. The relationships will be based on the respective roles agreed between the parties and should be appropriate to the service. Care should be taken to avoid the generation of a contract management industry where costs exceed its benefits. Generally minor items should be dealt with directly between the users and the contractors while more fundamental issues need to involve the contract management structures. It is more beneficial to solve problems jointly rather than having one party imposing a solution on another. Continuous dialogue will help to identify problems early often giving greater scope for solutions before they seriously affect the service provided and at worst allowing time for contingency plans to be implemented by the users. Whilst difficult to define, the Authority’s ethos and culture will have an impact on the relationship with the supplier. SECTION 1 - WHAT IS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT? Strategic service contracts will place a greater emphasis on these relationships, which may exist, at different levels within the groups. At senior level the contract strategy and potential major changes will be the focus while monitoring the performance and service delivery will be the focus at operational level. Recognising that there may vast numbers of users of a service communication routes must be considered e.g.: The extent to which local user/provider communication is encouraged or permitted Whether the provider will be the first point of contact for individual user requirements or queries (or will contract management act as a filter). SECTION 2 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO A CONTRACT BEING AWARDED? Getting the Arrangements Right A framework within which contract management will subsequently be conducted should be developed during procurement planning. The main areas to be addressed are shown below: The Contract Getting Arrangements Right: Building Blocks CM Team Define the Service Specification & outputs Performance indicators Pricing Pricing factors Variations Break conditions Assignments Early appointment Procurement Resourcing the team Post tender negotiate Training Contract Management Procedures Devising procedures Managing problems Escalation Arbitration Recording resolution Performance information Management information Transition plans Relationships Internal structures Roles, responsibilities Balance of relationships Department culture The Contract Contracts should provide the contract management team and the contractor with clarity and flexibility and should: Set out exactly what services are to be provided Require the potential supplier to specify how the transition from existing contracts and to future contracts is to be effected, including documentation and software Define performance standards and performance indicators (i.e. how the service will be judged) Define who is responsible for providing performance information and the Information required State any unacceptable methods of providing the service (the method of providing the service should be for the supplier to decide) Define the relationship between output and charges Define how the relationship between the Authority and the provider will work (to enable the supplier to estimate the resources required and the costs of managing the interface) SECTION 2 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO A CONTRACT BEING AWARDED? Provide for regular short and long term reviews throughout the contract life Define the pricing mechanism (fixed or variable), the method of payment and any links to performance; for variable price contracts, specify the criteria for price variation and the period of review Include a procedure for managing future changes Detail any arrangements for the use and care of the departments assets (land, buildings, utilities, IT, stores, etc) Define the rights of the Authority to audit the supplier’s systems Make provision for contract assignment to a private sector supplier Define break conditions, including periods of notice required, and sometimes specified break points Performance Indicators (PI’s) An effective system of performance measurement should be tackled in stages: Identify the services to be provided Identify the Critical Success Factors for that particular contract Identify the key PIs, targets and measures. These must be objective Identify the components to be measured or assessed including outputs - what will be produced and outcomes - what is the effect of the service. Performance indicators need to be appropriate and achievable. This requires knowledge of the market and the provider concerned. The principle of PI’s need to be included in the contract specification, but the actual setting will often be done as part of the negotiation with individual contractors, but before the contract price is agreed and the contract signed. Incentivisation Payment to contractors linked to additional performance is “incentivisation”. The approach sets out to provide benefits to both the user (quality of service or reduced costs) and the contractor (increased profits and marketable experience) as the contractor rises through the learning curve. Such systems have costs. The contractor and the contract management team will have to produce and analyze information to determine the correct payments. Procedures will have to be implemented to manage the system. It is most likely to be cost effective on long duration, higher value contracts. Termination While normally only used as a last resort and resulting in a lose-lose situation, the contract may need to be terminated as a result of: Unacceptable performance by the supplier Change in government policy Change in user needs In the event of a contract break, contingency plans will be required to ensure continuity of service. This is especially important when the service is business critical and the contractor has break rights in the contract. An existing contractor is required to co-operate with new contractors to effect a transition SECTION 2 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO A CONTRACT BEING AWARDED? Dispute Resolution A contract may specify the system of arbitration or arbiter to be used in case of unresolved conflict. Beyond such arbitration, contract conditions can be enforced in the courts. However, these are unlikely to improve service delivery and must only be used as a last resort. If used, the contract has already failed. Contract Management Team A contract management team will be required for the more risky or complex contracts. The aim is to minimise the resources consistent with securing VFM and reliability of service. It is important that the team obtain the support of senior management who may have a role to play in managing and sustaining the relationship with contractors. It is particularly critical that the team are involved in: Drawing up the specification and evaluation criteria Evaluating proposals. The size of the team will depend on: The scope of the contract/s The risks involved The complexity of the pricing mechanism The level of control required. The team will need a full understanding of: The legal implications of contract for which they are responsible The contract terms and conditions, including any incentivisation conditions The proper certification and authorisation of invoices The Authority’s rights if things go wrong The Authority’s duties and responsibilities under the contract The procurement process and post tender negotiation Any assumptions made by the department and the supplier The department’s expectations of the service relationship The main cost determinants, how they relate to the outputs and quality standards, and how they will be measured. Skills & Competencies: The following competencies might usefully be found in the contract management team. It will be necessary to judge which of these, and to what level, are appropriate for each contract. The team may require: Full or part time staff Advice from other departments External assistance. Knowledge of: The types of contract and contract law The procurement process including specifications and contract management needs The supply conditions and developments in relevant markets Pricing mechanisms SECTION 2 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO A CONTRACT BEING AWARDED? Risk management techniques and contingency planning The terms and conditions of individual contracts The roles and responsibilities of the contract manager, contract officer users and suppliers The need to seek and achieve continuous improvement Benchmarking techniques and their application Performance management techniques Quality assurance techniques The need to forecast future demand The principles underpinning government accounting and financial management Relationship management. Abilities: To define the business needs and develop a contracting strategy To identify the principal demand and cost drivers for each service To produce and implement plans for managing relationships with suppliers To complete an analysis of risks associated with each contact To analyze the contract management environment and adopt the appropriate management style To apply contract management procedures and techniques To negotiate successfully To control expenditure To manage users and users’ demands To manage relationships successfully Individual Qualities: The ability to work effectively as a member of a team Effective negotiating and influencing skills Effective interpersonal skills Well developed analytical skills A forward looking and pro-active approach The ability to exercise sound judgment A positive and practical attitude to change and innovation The ability to work reliably under pressure and prioritise competing demands. Training The skills and competencies of the contract management team members should be assessed. Any shortfalls need to be remedied by either recruitment of additional members to the team or the training of existing members. Post - Tender Negotiations Although undesirable, both users and contractors may request modifications to the tender specification. Performance standards and price variations will often be tailored to individual contractors, usually because of the types and variety of services they offer. The result may require post tender negotiation before the contract can be agreed and signed. Contract management staff should be involved to ensure continuity. A clear understanding of the original specifications and the reasons for them will be required to ensure the user needs are met. All of these negotiations must be complete prior to contract agreement. Fundamental changes to the original specification could compromise the basis of the procurement and lead to challenge from other bidders, so re-advertising and re-tendering must be carried out and the entire process done again. SECTION 2 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO A CONTRACT BEING AWARDED? Procedures Clear procedures established at the outset maximise the efficiency of contract management while minimising the disruption that problems may otherwise cause. Some will apply to the regular contract management functions; others will be used as and when required. Contractors and users should understand procedures. Procedures will ensure that: Problem details are recorded and proper documentation is maintained Information is shared at the appropriate levels of management on a timely basis by all parties Problems are addressed in a proper manner consistent with the contract conditions Open mindedness and addressing the facts is encouraged It is clear how disputes between the parties are to be resolved. Every effort should be made to resolve problems at the lowest practical level. However, provisions should be made for escalation up through levels of management and ultimately to the formal dispute resolution procedure Procedures will be required for: Approval of transition plans Submission, processing and certification of invoices for payment Reviews of contract and adjustments of prices Assessment of risk Planning of contingency events Review and control of budget Problem management arrangements Disputes resolution; management of change - variations requested by either the supplier or the department Service and performance management providing information, monitoring activity and reporting requirements The control of user/3rd party relationships Security Monitoring of compliance - adherence to above procedures Implementation of termination provisions. SECTION 3 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED? Managing Problems However good the relationship between users and contractors and however stable the service being delivered, problems may arise. The aim is to minimise the consequences by encouraging co-operation and a mutual desire to resolve the issue. Clear procedures that are followed from the outset should be established .A key function of contract management is to anticipate problems. The most common causes of problems are: Failure to anticipate major risks or changes Lack of preparation or contingency planning Changes of requirements Failure to consult Conflict of objectives Inaccurate original assumptions Changes in user needs Wholly unforeseen events Failure of the supplier to deliver Mistakes people make The consequences of problems can be reduced by: Early identification and remedial action Prepared contingency plans Regular reviews with users and suppliers Agreed procedures Contract changes implemented when appropriate Users who are aware of changes particularly when they affect the way the service is used Boundaries of delegated authority which are adhered to Problem escalation to senior levels when appropriate. When things do go wrong: Exactly what has gone wrong? Has it or something similar happened before? Why has it gone wrong? Is it a one-off problem? If not, how likely is it to recur and how often? Can it be put right and if so what is the cost to the supplier or user? Managing Users Managing a large user group can be complex and time consuming. Users, sometimes in user groups, have many useful roles, including: Communicating effectively Monitoring performance Managing change Predicting future needs Publicising service standards Setting priorities, especially when under budgetary pressure Managing other users, queries and complaints. SECTION 3 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED? However, unless managed the users can create excessive demands that have a negative effect on the contract as well as value for money, therefore it is vital that consultation and inclusion is set with realistic roles and expectations. Managing Performance The supplier’s performance must be monitored against pre-determined, clear and agreed criteria set out in the contract. Monitoring should be carried out to a plan which assesses the: Quality of the service against the Critical Success Factors Cost of the service Timeliness of the service Extent to which the user’s needs are being met Recognising these may change with time Use and care of the department’s assets. The frequency of monitoring and reporting will need to be decided for each contract. In the event of identified poor performance, remedial action should be taken as soon as possible and the effectiveness monitored. There is often a need for a robust stance towards nonperformance with a view to improving the service delivery. A record of the performance and the action taken must be maintained and will prove invaluable should a trend of poor performance emerge. Where performance has exceeded requirements, action may also be required to build on the success and take advantage of any new opportunities presented. Default Failure to perform may constitute a breach of contract, as can failure to take remedial action. The severity of the failure and the cost to the Authority will need to be assessed. Legal advice should be sought before any action is considered. Default under the contract may arise from a failure to: Perform any part of the services Provide financial or management information Pay any sub-contractors or suppliers within 30 days Employ appropriately qualified, experienced, skilled or trained staff Comply with legislation Managing Change and Contract Variation The quantity quality and even the nature of the user’s needs may change during the life of a contract. Contracts should include procedures to manage change but normally only when such changes are anticipated or planned in advance. The business needs should be reviewed at regular intervals to anticipate potential changes that may be required with regard to the contract. Consideration should be given to: New products New technology Changes in market prices Revised business objectives. If significant changes are anticipated during the contract life, there should be greater empowerment of the contractor to initiate change, especially to take advantage of new techniques and technology. SECTION 3 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED? Contracts should incorporate a mechanism for pricing variations. However, these are seldom as competitive as those in the original contract. It follows that changes must be managed in detail and will consume considerable effort from all parties. This effort itself adds to the contract costs. The essential stages of a managed change procedure are to: Record any potential need for change Consider the full implications of the change Ensure those concerned have the authority to agree the change Record each step of the action taken Ensure a formal contract change is produced Inform the users of the agreed changes. Care must be taken with the cumulative effect of a number of changes to a contract. Negotiation A fundamental aspect to any contract management activity is that of negotiating, successful negotiation depends on a myriad of key points and factors, which may include: Training if you are new to negotiating or assistance from experienced negotiators Becoming familiar with the appropriate guidance’s Planning and preparing negotiation strategies in advance Being clear about your aims, what you have to offer, what the supplier has to offer and aims to achieve Assess realistically what is of value to you and the other party which party is under most time pressure and which party has most to lose if negotiations break down Reviewing the process in order to learn for the future. Managing Risk As part of all contract management activity the evaluation of risk is essential, effective risk management will: Reduce the impact of risk on the performance of the contract Reduce contract management costs and lead to effective utilization of resources Give greater job satisfaction Yield maximum benefits for the Authority and more productive relationships with users and suppliers Lead to more satisfied users and suppliers Increase the reliability of the service. In general terms the contract management team should: Check regularly to see if the most recent risk assessment has been evaluated and valid Manage down the risks by: o o o o o Identifying that action is required Planning the appropriate action Recording and implementing the plan Monitoring the effectiveness of the action and: When the level of risk is acceptable, consider reducing the contract management resources passing responsibility to the supplier. SECTION 3 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED? When managing risk consider the following if the level of risk to is unacceptable and needs to be managed down. Relationships Consider roles of different members in the contract management team Should more senior personnel be involved? Are specific aspects of the relationships failing? User Education Do the users know what to expect from the service? How are they to be educated? Do the users have effective input to the contract management process? Performance Monitoring Is reliance on user monitoring or supplier self-assessment? Is the level of resource dedicated to monitoring appropriate for the service and the risks? Contingency Planning Are the existing contingency plans adequate? What would the Authority do if the supplier were unable to deliver the required service? Is accepting some delay whilst a replacement supplier is established an acceptable one? Detailed plans for establishing required emergency cover. Researching the Market Does the Authority understand the way the market works sufficiently well? Are mechanisms available to keep knowledge current? Effective Budget Control Is the focus on pro-active budget control? Are end-of-year costs being forecast or are only current costs being recorded? Are budget predictions early enough to take remedial action? Are major factors influencing the service demands known, understood and monitored? SECTION 3 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED? Contract Appraisal / Reviews In addition to regular performance monitoring, the contract performance should be appraised or reviewed more comprehensively at intervals appropriate to the service provided. These appraisals are key to anticipating problems. Short-term appraisals should include: Current issues and potential problems Information - timely adequate and relevant Developing trends Impending events Changed demands from users. Longer-term appraisals should include assessment of: Achievement of objectives - reasons for variance Quality of service - fitness for purpose Financial position versus budget Effectiveness of relationships - suppliers/ users/ contract management Flexibility of service delivery Initiative and responsiveness of supplier/ Authority to change Planning and control exercised by supplier - particularly in response to changed needs User satisfaction level Extent to which improved VFM is being achieved Opportunities to reduce costs, improve services or procedures. Budgetary Issues Sound budgetary procedures will be required to ensure: Services are delivered within budget Budget difficulties are identified early enough to take remedial action Remedial actions are decided, implemented and monitored User demands are managed All staff, especially those in contract management are aware of their responsibilities and limits of authority All staff act in accordance with Departmental and government accounting policies for each contract Fraud & Impropriety: The processes associated with the awarding, managing, monitoring and paying for contracts inevitably give opportunity for fraud and impropriety. All staff have a responsibility to minimise the risk of fraud. Managers in particular should regularly consider probity issues and ensure their systems minimise the opportunities for fraud. Budget holders have the responsibility for ensuring the necessary controls are being administered by maintaining audit trails (see below). SECTION 3 – CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED? Maintaining Audit Trail’s: It is essential to keep records of dealings with contractors, whether written or verbal. All information should be kept on the file relating to each contract. Records will be especially valuable for: Problem solving especially if problems lead to litigation Appraisal meetings and re-negotiations Audit purposes Planning any subsequent re-tendering process. Managing Transition: Transition from one contractor to another needs to be planned well in advance. The detailed transition plans will include: Winding down existing arrangements Developing effective procedures for a smooth handover Evaluating the advantages of a period of parallel running Educating the users to the new arrangements Communicating the supplier’s setting up timetable Introducing the new arrangements. SECTION 4 – A TYPICAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT CYCLE The Contract Management Activities The typical contract management activities have clear and defined links to procurement activities i.e. the purchasing of goods, services or works. Generally speaking however contract management activities include: Identifying the Need and Setting Direction Activities include: Define user needs Agree sourcing policy Set contract and service objectives Agree contract management style Establish budget management Review existing contracts. Preparation and Procurement Activities include: Appoint the contract management team Decide budget management approach Decide policies and procedures Specify output based requirements Assess risks and allocate responsibilities Issue invitations to tender Participate in contractor selection process Assess tenders Negotiate the contract. Transition and Handover Activities include: Disengage from existing arrangements Restructure management as required Monitor set-up operations Transfer responsibilities Implement new arrangements. Contract and Relationship Management Activities include: Assess and manage risk Manage Authority/contractor relationship Monitor the contract performance and effectiveness Retain adequate control Manage changes Encourage continuous improvement Manage performance shortfalls Manage budget effectively SECTION 4 – A TYPICAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT CYCLE Control payments. Contract Appraisal Activities include: Assess the performance of the supplier Assess the effectiveness of management Determine if the anticipated benefits have been realized Check the business needs Examine competitive options Anticipate changes Re-assess the risks Consider renewal strategy. Checklist for effective contract management Issue Criteria Overall Framework Is there a nominated contract manager/team? Do they have delegated authority? Has it been adhered to? Do they know the contract budget? Understanding the Requirement Do they fully understand the outputs set out in the contract and fully understand the link to cost? Do they fully understand the key conditions in the Contract? Contract Management Activity Value for Money Have the main factors determining cost Been identified and are they being Monitored? Have all changes adhered to procedures? Are any substantial changes anticipated? Is the correct information being generated and are management-reporting procedures satisfactory? Are invoices being properly certified and authorized? Is the budget on profile? Were the required outputs delivered satisfactorily? Are views of the users sought? Are the key risks fully understood/ Do adequate contingency plans exist? Do review meetings take place with the supplier? Can the team demonstrate that VFM is being provided? SECTION 5 – SALFORD SUPPORTING PEOPLE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK? Introduction The Salford Supporting People Contract Management Framework (See Fig.1) has been designed to assist contract managers, officers and contractors to manage and monitor contracts over the whole life of the contract to ensure any issues associated to the contract can be dealt with in a robust, fair, efficient and transparent manor. Generally speaking the contract management cycle begins when a new contract has been agreed, either through a procurement process (new service) or a re-negotiated process (existing service). For newly procured services (for more information regarding procurement please refer to the Salford Supporting People Procurement Strategy 2007-2010) the contract will commence only after the contract and service specification has been discussed and the workbook schedules have been negotiated. For re-negotiated processes the contract will have been appraised using the Salford Supporting People Framework. A workbook has been produced to assist all those involved in managing Salford Supporting People contracts (App1). As an interim tool with an interim function the workbook is intended to sit behind the contracts issued by the Salford Supporting People Department, giving greater clarity to the contractual obligations contractors have when delivering housing related support services across the City of Salford to vulnerable groups. The workbook when used in conjunction with general contract management processes identify contractual obligations outside of the service specification, the workbook also supports the Salford Supporting People Department to assess and evaluate risks associated to the contract. The workbook, which we have produced, covers six areas known as ‘Schedules’. Each schedule covers: Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3 Schedule 4 Schedule 5 Schedule 6 General Service Data Housing Related Support Obligations Quality and Performance Management Action Plan Quality Assurance Framework Review Contract Appraisal and Risk Assessment Summary Recontracting recommendations As part of the contract appraisal process, usually commencing 14 weeks prior to the contract end date (App2) (this does depend on total length of contract, and whether procurement activity is required) we request that the contractor produce and provide statistical and qualitative reports (App3) as part of their contractual obligation and our appraisal process (cited in the Supporting People New Steady State Contracts (App4) and service specifications (App5)). This includes submitting up to date performance data using the SPI workbook (App6), completing a QAF self-assessment (App7) and if required producing a business case (App8) if requesting expansion or extra revenue. Finally, Value for Money (App9) and Strategic Relevance (App10) will continue to be assessed and evaluated as an ongoing contract management activity. SECTION 5 – SALFORD SUPPORTING PEOPLE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK? Supporting People Contracts Team - Division of Responsibility Supporting People Contract Manager: The Contract Manager oversees the entire contract management cycle, supervises Contract Officers and presents recommendations for re-contracting to both core strategy and commissioning body. The Contract Manager is responsible for: Developmental activities that lead to significant contractual changes with regard to strategic positioning and relevance as directed by the core strategy and commissioning body groups, this would potentially include procurement and tendering. Issues relating to poor performance, quality etc that would lead to the issuing of default, suspension or termination notices, the latter under the governance of both core strategy and commissioning body groups. Dealing with contractual disputes, conflicts and concerns and will direct courses of action to Contract Officers as and when needed. A team of officers responsible for managing and monitoring all Salford Supporting People contracts Ensuring any changes to the contract in terms of cost are communicated to the finance and payments section The Contract Manager is responsible to the Supporting People Lead Officer, Accountable Officer, Core Strategy Development Group and Commissioning Body and will report back to these individuals / groups all matters concerning contractual issues. Supporting People Contract Officers: The Contract Officers are primarily responsible for the monitoring and management of the general contracts held with providers. Officers are required to conduct mid term and annual appraisals alongside and in consultation with providers and if appropriate service users (please refer to Salford Supporting People Communication and Involvement Strategy 2006 / 2010) and produce documents and reports relating to contractual obligations concerning the quality and performance of the service as well as make provisional recommendations for recontracting. Contract Officers are responsible for setting up and monitoring action plans, risk management plans etc with contractors if failure to deliver on the contract is recognised during the contractual period. Officers are required to advise the Contracts Manager of such issues and how these are being resolved. SECTION 5 – SALFORD SUPPORTING PEOPLE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK? Larger changes or recommendations to default, suspend or terminate a contract should be passed up to the Contracts Manager who will then take responsibility and lead on any action required (issued by either the core strategy of commissioning body groups). The Contracts Manager will delegate actions to Contract Officers as part of any remedial process concerning a particular contract. The Contract Officer is required to devise and develop remedial action plans and report on progress to the Contracts Manager. Contract Officer’s are expected to deal with and negotiate any minor changes to contracts, following process and procedure as well as keep contract files and systems up to date and accurate. Contract Officers are expected to think strategically and make recommendations based on their analysis of the contracts they manage and monitor, feeding back issues, which have been identified during the contract period. Fig.1 The framework below represents the cyclical approach, which Salford Supporting People Department use when managing, monitoring and appraising all of its housing related support contracts. SECTION 7 –CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY To conclude, this guidance has identified and illustrated how Salford Supporting People Department will conduct its contract management operations in line with our legal requirement under contractual law, supported by the wider corporate and national approach to contract management of Supporting People Services. By developing and introducing this guide our intention is to ensure that all contract management activity is fair, transparent and fully endorses our obligations to promote positive, non-discriminatory practice. We will ensure that approach to contract management is inclusive and our processes stand up to scrutiny and challenge. We will continue to undertake service reviews and contract appraisals and work alongside our partners and contractors to ensure every service we commission: Offers Value For Money Is adaptable and able to shape and modernise Is risk managed Has training and development at the forefront of its agenda Offers continuous quality improvements Performs well, Links into both sustainability and regeneration agendas Strives to work in partnership with us to ensure that every vulnerable citizen in Salford has an opportunity to access a service that is able to meet his or her needs. Finally, as our commitment to positive contract management will continue to develop over the next three years, we will endeavour to continue our strong ethos to involve and consult colleagues, partners, wider stakeholders and service users (new and old) when engaging in contract management activity now and in the future. By adapting our flexible approach to the way we manage contracts we hope to respond positively and firmly to Council driven objectives as well as National changes in legislation or policy.