Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
home page layout
Look and Feel
Secondary/tertiary page template/layout
university library branding
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Like BYU-- top third is image with search
interface as an overlay. left two thirds (when
full size) has chunks for research and news &
Events with columns of links. Right side has
(most needed?) library info and resources as
tiles with specific user group sections below
that on left side. Good use of chunking of info
and breaking up layout between columns,
tiles and expandable menus. I really like the
layout-- meets a lot of user needs and
business objectives--Discovery interface
dominates at top with research tools
expanded in center of page Info for common
tasks as tiles on left side, different user
groups below that, and News & Events
beginning and present just above the fold.
Help is called out well with Ask us! and icon.
Consolidated pages for headers (ex. "Start
your Research") not accessible through
header links but through "more" when present
or not at all. Must get to these pages by going
down a level and clicking on links in
breadcrumbs. E-Journals, Databases,
Encyclopedias, E-Newspapers, are all
LibGuides templates. Page layouts are a mix
of columns and tabs, with no single unified
layout. Non LibGuides pages basic 2-3
columns of headers and list items/links, no
images.
University of Washington Libraries branding
prominent in banner with UW logo. UW colors
(purple and gold) throughout as headers and
links. However, Gold UW logo looks like it's
part of University Libraries branding. Actually,
it is separate, and takes you to UW home
page.
Big image carousel of news, collections,
services, with smaller preview icon on right
(mimics carousel on Vandy homepage), some
touch buttons, emphasis is not on research
(search is a button in navigation - no search box
on page unless you hover over search), not a lot
of scrolling, flat colors with slight gradient in
header, black and gold Vandy colors, plus
complimentary color palate, responsive design
removes image carousel, homepage fits on
screens easily, "Use the Library" box has icons
and links of most heavily used services
2 different colors used for page name and
headings (h1, h3), but not always consistently
used, image bar at top of every secondary and
many tertiary pages that is random on
Consistent logo throughout, small persistent bar
at top to campus website, and other links
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Look and Feel
Website
Evaluation Criteria
fonts and colors
use of image
use of video
balance of text, image, white-space
Experience
Across
Devices
responsive
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Headers and body text all sans serif, but
weird (very little) spacing between page
headers and text. Beige/Gold not a very
strong choice for headers. The purple subheaders stand out much more. Similar to UH,
they seem stuck with a very narrow range of
University-branded colors-- purple, gold and
sometimes dark grey.
Use of full bleed image on home page behind
search and use of images in tiles very
effective. Not much of a visual grammar in
terms of images after that. Different shapes
and sizes positioned sporadically throughout
the site. No full bleed images I can find other
than home page. Nice use of image in banner
on pages below home page, although they
used the same image for every page. Good
or Bad?
Very thorough well organized library of
research instruction videos. Found under
Support>How Do I . . . Cannot find any
promotional use of video.
Very good balance of text in short columns
with images and tiles breaking up the layout,
clarifying the different chunks of information.
Yes. Navigation hides under menu icons and
columns collapse as needed. Images do not
really adapt however. Mobile view also
retains graphical and image elements,
breaking up the text columns. I really like how
the most needed tasks when someone is on
mobile are called out in the mobile view.
Helvetica, lots of whitespace, black, gold,
turquoise colors
Lots of images, images in headers on
secondary/tertiary pages are scalable and still
display on mobile, 2 images also always display
in the "Use the Library" box (latest news and
special collections), use of icons match theme
and are unique, use of oak leaf and acorn
consistent throughout site
Video tutorials (Camtasia) under some
branches, but not necessarily at point of need
Nice balance, good spacing, many images, but
not necessarily relevant to content on page
Yes, very nice. Big images are removed,
smaller images are SVG, and some content is
rearranged so much used services (like hours
and locations) are at top in buttons, site
designed for both tablets and smart phones,
Primo doesn't become responsive for tablet
sizes, but does for smart phone size, and it
looks terrible. Also, all navigation goes away no more user portals. Campus libraries link
changes to Locations button.
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
big touch targets
optimized for
touch
limited hover behavior, tooltips
Discovery of Discovery
interface
resources
Location and
presentation of
search tools
architecture
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Other than tiles on expanded home page, big Yes. Buttons or big images are links. No
touch targets aren't implemented. Mostly
hamburger buttons anywhere. On pages
traditional text links.
deeper in site that have internal navigation
(giving, scholarly communication), navigation
stays the same (links) and are difficult to touch.
Hover is present, but can open menus with
Hover in main navigation, but in responsive
touch. No real concerted use of tooltips
design, all user portals disappear, so no more
hover. No noticeable use of tooltips.
I really like the presence of the search
A search box is not visible anywhere on the site.
interface in top right on all pages after home A gold search button is prominent in the header
page. It is always visible which I think works main navigation, and when you hover over that,
better than hidden behind a dropdown (UH). a tabbed search box appears. A search for all
Three paths -- WorldCat, UW Libraries, and
gives bento box approach with names of tools,
Site Search. First two have unclear helper
not items you find in them (pictures, articles,
text, Site Search has clear helper text. I really books, etc.). DiscoverLibrary is one of the
like the Site Search/Item Search distinction,
options. Then under Catalogs tab,
but WorldCat vs UW Libraries is confusing.
DiscoverLibrary is listed there, and they treat it
Searching by database is hidden behind
like a catalog. Makes me think they are going to
Advanced search. Search tools well
phase out Acorn soon. I like that search is
organized in center of page under "Start your available from anywhere on the site, but not that
Research," However the categories seem to it's perpetually hidden.
overlap and are confusing. BYU does a really
good job of consolidating tools under
understood categories. Also-- I really like a
discovery section "Start Your Research" that
includes research tools plus course reserves
and collections
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
EvaluationLocation
Criteriaand
Discovery
interface
Discovery of
resources
Presentation of
search results
presentation of
search tools
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
The search as three tabs effectively
distinguishes search paths. Other than that,
Search tools are represented in body as
traditional links. Users interact with specific
tools (e.g. databases, research guides)
interaction
through LibGuides templates, usually
design (tabs,
involving bright yellow tabs. FOUR
buttons, etc)
DIFFERENT layouts organizing info by
alpha-- Articles, e-Journals, Research
Guides, Subject Librarians. Terrible use of
tabs in LibGuides templates. Using them as
links not as actual tabs.
WorldCat is featured, followed by the Catalog
(UW Libraries Search). E-Journals,
which tool(s)
Databases all given equal weight as links,
is/are
Research is the bottom link and not
featured
emphasized. Interesting-- they include
"Mobile Search Tools"
UW Worldcat results restricted to those with
UW NetID. UW Library search is primo.
Aggregated display of results. Facet options
and controls are typical of Primo. I don't
understand why you can continue to refine,
but not expand again. BYU results have
Aggregated and
usability
checkboxes that allow your to refine multiple
faceted display of
facets at once, and apply any combination in
search results
any one action. "Check for Availability" and
(discovery system
"Check for online access" seem redundant
default results)
over "Availability" and "Access Options" links.
On search results page, you lose Libraries
logo and way home.
I really prefer BYU's search results that put
research tool options above the search
satisfaction
results. I am not satisfied with the way facets
work in this Primo configuration.
6 options are present: All, Catalogs, Databases,
E-Journals, Research Guides, and Site Search.
All have helper text, some have additional info.
New users won't know what DiscoverLIbrary,
Acorn, or WorldCat are. They don't use the
word "articles" anywhere, so it leaves users
(me) confused. I feel jerked around a bit by
jargon and my personal understanding of how
libraries typically use discovery systems to find
articles vs. books and other types of materials.
Not sure if one tool is featured more than any
other,
Uses bento box approach
N/A
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
n/a
usability
Presentation of
search results
n/a
Federated "bento
box" display of
search results
satisfaction
Findability of
clarity of separation of research and library
most needed
operations info
info services
Clarity in Search interface; Common
info/tasks about using the library separated
out and featured; Start Your Research and
Use the Libraries I think is a good way to
separate these kinds of info
Displays search results in Bento box style, with
practically unusable results. I think I'd get better
results just going into the discovery system
(which if you remember is only directly
accessible under catalogs tab) than trying to
comprehend the jargon and poor display of
search results.
NOT satisfied. Can't tell what the search results
material types are. I apparently have to know
that acorn = books (mostly?) and that
DiscoverLibrary = articles (mostly?), and that
one, which would be the most important to
students, is at the bottom of the page! Also, the
word "more" is confusing. I thought it meant
more results, but apparently it instead takes you
to the record or page. Only some categories
(DiscoverLibrary and Acorn) offer to "See All
results" which take you into Primo or the
catalog. Additionally, Liaison librarians show up
under Research Help and don't seem to have
consistent or logical matches to the queried
topics. Eg., a search for "science" returns no
science databases and instead a library
developer's test page. Also, this federated
approach makes the page load considerably
slow at times, or time out completely. Good in
theory, but poor implementation. NCSU and
BYU's versions are much better
There is clarity of separation for sure. Research
is hidden under a tab. Homepage is all about
the news, services, events, and collections.
Anything about the library itself (About,
Employment, Staff) is in the footer. The Use the
Library bar is persistent throughout the site,
always on the left, and contains helpful links. I
like user portals, and I understand why so much
info is in footer. Just weird.
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
hours
Findability of
most needed
info services
ILL/borrowing
reserves
study rooms/using or reserving a space
computer/equipment/room availability
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Like Wisconsin, they have a bunch of libraries
so cannot display hours on home page
(although I think they can show 2 biggest
libraries). Easily findable behind tile,
however, hours page is long lists of libraries
and numbers and then another link to their
hours. They are featuring phone number
before hours? Could include open/closed
status and maybe hours for two main libraries
on home page and highlight them on hours
page. Also reduce clicks to hours.
Easy to find under Use the Library (expected).
Question: Is this where students will need
access to ILL? Or is it in the search result?
Very findable as visible link under Start Your
Research
Button on top right in main navigation, goes to
page with table of every library (9 places) and
shows all hours for a week. No display of current
hours on homepage - all libraries are treated
equally. Page is full of horizontal bars and not
visually attractive or easy to use quickly . Not as
friendly or clear what's open NOW as NCSU's
hours page.
Listed with icon in the "Use the Library" menu,
and sometimes listed under each of the user
portals. ILL/Faculty Delivery is commonly used.
This is buried on the Student Portal page. You
then have to click on Student Services, and read
to then discover that you need to log into Acorn
to find print reserves and OAK to find electronic
reserves. Not very prominent or clear.
Reserve a Space very easy to find as a tile on Getting to the "Study Rooms/Carrels" page is
home page. However, study rooms are listed easy as it's listed in the "Use the Library" menu
on specific library sites, so hard to find and a and under the Student portal. However, it's a
bit confusing.
long page with procedures and policies, and
there really aren't that many rooms to reserve.
Each library is different. Also, the page "Find
quiet study areas" is a narrative list that goes
through each library and tries to describe floors
and areas. Visuals would really help with this
instead. Also, this info is completely separate
from just finding a study space.
Basic computer info is very findable -The info is available under Student portal. You
however the equipment is managed by
can look at availability of circulating iPads and
Learning Technologies in IT -- must follow link laptops in each library, not presented anywhere
there, but no info on availability.
else on site. Also, you can see the total number
of all other types of equipment and computers
available for checkout/use in each of the
libraries, but doesn't display live availability data.
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Research guides link is present but not
featured-- at bottom of list items under Start
Your Research header.
research guides
my account
point of need help
Support
ask us
grad students
presenting
information to
User Groups
different types of
users
findability of
services
dedicated
page
faculty
findability of
services
dedicated
page
Research and course guides available under
Student portal. They have a LibAnswers box on
their Research Guides homepage. Nice
theming. All navigation except VU goes away.
Very prominent as a tile. (Could not log in.)
Only visible under the Students and
Faculty/Staff portals.
Help & Support persistent in global nav and
The only place to get help is on the Ask a
ask us! persistent and very visible in top right Librarian page, and it's as sparse as can be.
corner
NOT really helpful, unless you type in something
and go to LibAnswers. Also, there are no email
addresses visible for any librarian on the staff
directory - you have to use webform on site to
contact them. There are email addresses
available for service points or libraries, but those
are more buried. No way to get help by calling,
emailing (unless you search first), texting and
chat not options.
ask us! graphic is persistent and highly
There is the Ask a Librarian page, but to get any
visible. However, chat takes you to a new
help, you have to do a search. No contact info
page that replaces current page.
immediately available. No chat. No text. No
service desk numbers or emails listed, just link
to Subject Librarians page, Contact page, and
Staff Directory - none of which are that
immediately helpful.
Quite findable -- grad student-specific
Grads are lumped under student services. One
resources visible on homepage and a page is of the major portals in the main navigation
dedicated to them
Yes
yes
as with grad student resources, visible on
Faculty and Staff are put together as one of the
home page. However, going straight to those major portals in the main navigation
resources puts user into the middle of the
site.
Yes
yes
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
alumni / visitors
findability of
services
dedicated
page
those with
disabilities
findability of
services
dedicated
page
balance of meeting student needs and library
marketing objectives
Content
Strategy
voice
findable from home page
Special
Collections
physical/digital distinction
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Same as grad students/faculty. They even
break up visitors into K12 and Alumni/Visitors.
However, borrowing privileges hidden under
Visit logistics
Yes
These are separated out with entirely different
links under them. They are 2 of the major
portals in the main navigation
Pretty good, but under "MORE" which takes
you to Using the Libraries. Also under Using
the Libraries
No
Buried under the About Page, which is only
accessible through the footer.
Focus is definitely on research/using the
library, but News & Events are visible slightly
above the fold. Giving, however, not present
at all.
Yes, and Yes
yes
Focus is definitely on news, events, collections,
exhibits, and less emphasis on student services
or research. Very odd for a research library and
a campus with as many graduate students as
undergraduate students, but I know why this is
the case, unfortunately.
Uses a lot of bullet points. In cases of
Some bullets, mostly narrative in short
narrative, however (ex. dropdown menus), it's sentences. Too wordy in some places. Too
too wordy. On specific library sites there is
much library jargon, abbreviations (ILL).
some narrative, but still it's all in bullet points. Professional in voice, but typos and spacings
wrong in many places and was distracting.
yes, link under Start your research, but not
Yes, in the "Use the Library" menu. Not
really called out
accessible anywhere else. Not even in About
section.
Very good physical/digital distinction on
Spec Coll homepage and navigation is odd.
Collections & Archives page. in two widely
Nothing but images with text, so you have to
separated columns.
read everything, and everything has equal
weight. It also says featured collections, but not
everything is a collection. You can search
collection by subject, but you can't easily see
what subjects there are unless you read
everything on the length of the page. Also,
under ANOTHER area where there are 4 main
collections, they list Book, Manuscript,
Photographic, and University Archives. None of
these are digital. Can't easily find digital
collections.
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
each findable from home page
link in footer
Branches
different look and feel/layout between branches?
Users think it's a different site?
Giving to the
findable from home page
Libraries
getting back to the home page
How flexible (can
options grow?)
Navigation
Primary and
secondary
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Yes, under Libraries & Hours
Yes, under Campus Libraries. (There aren't
other campuses, just branch libraries.)
Believe it or not, yes. (there's a bunch)
Nope, because they are all listed in the main
navigation.
Branch libraries have the same layout
Branches all look the same, almost too much
framework. Local nav is in the same place
the same because of the repetitiveness of the
and styled the same. Very clear you're on the images. Links are different, but categories are
same site. The layouts of each libraries' sites' all the same. The only site that's different is the
body text can vary. Some similar blocks and Biomedical Library.
some very different layouts, depending on
(clearly) the resources of the individual library
Under about the libraries as Support the
Yes, in the footer, very prominent. Can't miss it.
Libraries. Not very prominent.
Lose Home icon in UW Libraries Search
results page. Only way home is link in footer.
Home is redundant in global navigation on
lower level pages. W logo is confusing,
because it seems part of the libraries logo
Global nav could add 1 more option on full
size screen;
Getting back to the homepage from anywhere in
the site is very easy, although once you are in
DiscoverLibrary (Primo) or Acorn (Catalog), you
can only click on the logo in the footer.
Breadcrumbs seem to work well.
Main nav doesn't have more room, although in
tablet view, it moves below logo. Use the
Library menu can grow because it's a list
instead of a horizontal row.
Navigation both vertically and laterally can be
problematic. 2nd level pages are only
accessed through "More". (BYU puts "view
all" closer to header, which makes more
sense.) Start your Research is not displayed
in global navigation on home page, but
appears on all pages below. On home page,
it is at the same level as News & Events, but
that's not in the global nav. Unclear where
user group pages are in the architecture.
There is no "More" in the navigation, so that's
not a problem. However, like Washington, for
many other things, you have to scroll to the
bottom of a list to see "more" options. It's also
used on pages where there could be a lot of
content, and instead they only display 1
sentence and then have the "more". Also,
"more" is consistent throughout the site because
they use a little yellow arrow, so it becomes
familiar. On the homepage alone, there are
between 5-6 mores.
Number of links
How are options (other content)
that are not displayed handled?
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
quick access links in
appropriate/expected places
Within microsites
My Account
managing unique navigation
needs for sites within sites (like
Spec Coll, Giving and
Technology pages)
What services (whether library or campus services)
are listed under the link, and what the interaction is
like
what information is presented
Staff profile
pages
are images standardized across profiles?
how publications/scholarship is presented
Maps &
Directions
how are the various branch locations presented to
users?
how are locations and directions to different service
points within the library handled? (e.g. Spec Coll,
ARC, LC, Rockwell)
How are past events handled?
News &
Events
How are regularly occurring events handled? Do
they have a homepage existing outside of an event
calendar? (like Poetry & Prose does)
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Excellent job of providing quick links to
common info needs on home page-- hours,
computers & printing, etc.; Cool idea -- Quick
Fact Resources in right side panel on Start
your Research page.
I like the Use the Library Menu. It's almost
always there on the left, and the little icons are
nice. Not many other links, seriously. Hours is a
button, and Search is also persistent, but no real
Help or My Account prominent. Force users to
use portals.
User group pages -- take you to pages under This is done fairly well on branch pages as well
main site categories, but you don't know
as pages like Scholarly Communication and
where you are or how to get back. Also -Giving to the Libraries. It's a box with links and a
navigation to sections of UW main site and
picture on the right side of the page. Very clear.
other campuses present above banner
However, it doesn't translate well on mobile.
Quite visible as a tile on the home page, but Only visible under the Students and
no idea what services lie behind it. Many
Faculty/Staff portals. My Account takes you to
services, like reserving a room, required UW an Acorn (catalog) login page, must have VUnet
NetID log in. Library Account is authenticated ID. No access to any other services except
with UW NetID.
faculty delivery, which is through the catalog.
Staff Directory is bad. Browse by searching Not spectacular. Contains basic contact info,
with no search terms. Only contact info for
and mostly only librarians have pictures. Email
staff, while subject librarians have very
addresses aren't listed - have to use contact
extensive LibGuides pages.
form. Individual email addresses are listed on
separate library pages, under "Ask ____"
no
Sort of. Either small head-shot or the Vandy
logo.
Some list publications in separate tab on
Nope.
LibGuides. Profile Link is a loop.
Home>Libraries & Hours>Hours & Contact
The are small images that lead to PDFs. That's
Info>click on map>big map with location
it. PDFs.
highlighted. No directions,however.
No map for the individual libraries, only lists of They aren't. Service point info found on some of
service points by floor. Service point info
the individual library pages, not consistent.
found on site of individual library
Do not see any past events
No events. Just news (Wordpress) and there is
an archives of that, and an extensive category
list.
New page header is NEWS EVENTS
None that I can tell.
EXHIBITS
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
How broad is the scope of events?
How are users able to keep current with news?
RSS, email, subscription, other?
Are there other sources of news (like spec coll
blog) and how are presented with the other news
(separate or aggregated)?
Electronic
resources
issues
Notes
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
NEWS EVENTS EXHIBITS; provides links to
College of Arts & Sciences calendar and UW
calendar; Calendar can only be reached by
clicking on individual event
Events are mixed in with News. However,
Special Collections Exhibits site lists events.
There are also events on Scholarly
Communications page. No calendars, no signups, just news about it.
Library Calendar, News & Info and Blog feeds RSS. That's it.
on separate page. Can subscribe to each.
Stay Connected has Social Media + Sign up
for E-News
Don't see any blog posts on Events page, but Exhibits are handled completely separate, and
may exist, I just haven't found any.
there is some news there.
Mixed in with news, if at all.
How are these presented to the user?
General notes that don't fit any criteria
Home page meets a lot of needs (search,
Clean, consistent design
common tasks, user groups, promote events)
Nice use of images
Strengths
Most used services, news, and Special
Collections access available throughout in “Use
the Library” box
Nice use of tag lines to give more info about a Responsive design is very nice, and some
section or page
content is removed and some moved to top with
nice touch targets
Responsive (to some extent)
Nice information architecture of scholarly
communications
Easy access to common tasks on mobile
Nice distinction between site and item search
Addresses needs of different user groups
Services split out by users so info is more
relevant and not overwhelming
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
Strengths
Weaknesses
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Presents one research across several (oncampus) libraries, but each library has a
separate space for describing their resources
Over-reliance on LibGuides; info may not map
well to templates governed by (ugly yellow)
tabs.
Easy to get lost (site map not always clear)
Very trim site, not a lot of info, and what’s there
is often very narrative although some attempts
to reduce content with “see more” yellow arrow
Noticed several typos (misspellings)
UW WorldCat/UW Libraries Search clear to
user?
Help not prominent, and only self-help is really
emphasized; No way for users to easily call or
email (both buried or forced to use webform);
Chat and Text options not present
Research not prominent; search hidden, search
results slow and not entirely relevant; Primo
interface needs improvement
Too much jargon and branding of tools:
DiscoverLibrary, OAK, Acorn, ILL, etc.
Touch targets just links and hover
IT manages computers, determining
availability on site difficult
Library Website Competitive Analysis
Data Sheet
Website
Evaluation Criteria
Weaknesses
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
Robert Newell
Rachel Vacek
http://www.lib.washington.edu/
http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/
Experience varies across different libraries’
sites. Some have research resources, some
just description (users would use these two
kinds of sites differently).
Confusing when most research info on big
Libraries site, but physical resource info on
specific libraries sites; for room resources,
can alternate between main site, a specific
libraries’ site, and IT site
Services split out for different types of users
makes a lot of assumptions - Technology not
usable by faculty? Students don’t need subject
liaisons?
Special Collections info only about print, and
exhibits totally separate site, with some
“collections” there (curated online exhibits?)
Weak staff profile pages
No calendar