PEGS Unit 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter Name: INTERACTIONS OF LIGHT AND MATTER Solar cells at the Vic Market produce electricity by using an interaction between light and matter These images are taken with an electron microscope using electrons rather than photons to obtain very high resolution images. 1 2 IDEAS ABOUT LIGHT AND MATTER Throughout the ages, people have wondered about the nature of the world in which they lived. What were things made of? If an object could be chopped into smaller and smaller pieces, what would we end up with? The idea of atoms has actually been around for thousands of years. It has only been in the past hundred years, however, that physicists have obtained experimental data that has allowed them to establish a model for the structure of the atom. What is your understanding of atoms, the building blocks of matter? In much the same way, people have also thought about light. What were the Sun and other stars producing? How was light able to travel around? Did it need a medium to travel through? How fast did it move? Was light a particle or a wave? It was very difficult to determine the nature of light because it travels so fast. Again, physicists have had to perform experiments and establish models that can be used to explain the many observed properties of light such as reflection, refraction, dispersion and diffraction. What is your understanding of the nature of visible light and the other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum? We now use a variety of light sources such as light globes, LEDs, lasers, etc. These light sources basically function in by one of two different processes:-by making materials very hot or :- by making electrons in excited atoms jump between energy levels. In this topic we will be looking at both of these processes. We now understand a great deal about the structure of atoms and subatomic particles – the stuff that matter is made of. Our understanding of light has also developed greatly over the past 150 years and we can use this knowledge to figure out what stars billions of light years away are made of! Devices such as lasers, electron microscopes, television picture tubes, solar cells, fluorescent tubes and X-ray imaging machines make use of the interaction between light and matter and our understanding of this process. PEGS Un it 4 Physics: What is light??? Interactions of light and matter 3 As we work through the topic, use this table to keep tabs on the relative success of each of the competing models for light. Property of light Demonstration Particle model Wave model Travels in straight lines Regular reflection Diffuse reflection Snell’s Law sin i =n sin r Refracts towards normal when slowing down Light travels slower in a denser medium Dispersion – splitting up into the colours of the rainbow 3 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter Property of light Demonstration Particle model 4 Wave model Higher frequencies are refracted more Light beams pass through each other unaffected Partial transmission / partial reflection at an interface Intensity ∝ 1/d2 Diffraction Interference Polarization Light can travel through a vacuum Photoelectric effect Pressure of light 4 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 11.1 Light−waves or particles? 5 From the seventeenth through to the early twentieth century, physicists debated the nature of light. Sir Isaac Newton, the most influential physicist of his time, favoured the idea that light consisted of particles. He was supported by the scientific community in general and his ideas survived for many years after his death in 1727. Newton's particle model stated that: • light consists of a stream of particles or corpuscles; and • light particles travel in straight lines at extremely high speeds Over time, however, experimental evidence supporting an opposing model mounted. This model was called the wave model and its proponents included physicists such as Huygens, Young, Fresnel and Maxwell. Read from page 405 to page 408 of the text, then describe how each model explains the following properties of light. Reflection Partial reflection/partial transmission (not in text) 5 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Refraction: Interactions of light and matter 6 the direction that light bends as it passes into another medium. the speed at which light travels as it passes into another medium. The evidence supporting the wave model of light seemed to be so conclusive that by 1870 it was the accepted theory throughout the scientific community. However; towards the end of the nineteenth century, further experimental evidence in the form of the photoelectric effect again threw the debate wide open. By the time this debate was settled in the early twentieth century, neither model was found to provide a satisfactory explanation for the behaviour of light. The resultant theory changed forever the way scientists viewed light and matter. Homework 11.1 1-9 6 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 7 11.2 Evidence supporting the Wave Model of Light Both the wave and the particle model could successfully explain properties of light such as reflection and propagation in a straight line, but these models were able to explain the other properties of light with varying degrees of success. Diffraction of light waves You have studied the diffraction of water waves in year 11 and diffraction of sound waves in year 12. Diffraction is the bending that takes place as a wave passes through an opening or past a barrier. The amount of diffraction that is present depends on the relationship between the wavelength λ and the opening or barrier size w. Amount of diffraction ≈ ! w Redraw these 3 scenarios showing the amount of diffraction present if a higher frequency water wave was used in each case. 7 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 8 Diffraction of light was observed around 1660 by Jesuit priest, Francesco Grimaldi. He noticed that when sunlight shone through a small hole, it did not make a clearly defined spot of light. The spot of light was surrounded by a fuzzy ring of light. The light was diffracting as it passed through the hole. Diffraction of light is not an effect that you would usually notice in everyday life. Special conditions such as a small, monochromatic light source and very narrow slits are required. If you try to create a diffraction pattern for light by shining laser light through a very narrow slit, you might expect to observe just a single fuzzy band of light as the light diffracts past the opening. In fact, a very distinctive interference pattern, consisting of a series of bright and dark bands, is formed. This is known as a single slit diffraction pattern. Red laser light Draw a pattern for blue laser light Homework questions Question 1: Diffraction is not evident when light passes through an opening 1 mm wide. What does this suggest about the wavelength of visible light? Question 2: Explain why coloured fringes can sometimes be seen at the edges of diffraction patterns that are formed when white light is shone through a narrow slit. Question 3: A diffraction pattern is formed on a screen when green light is incident upon a narrow single slit. What happens (if anything) to the pattern if: (a) the width of the slit is increased? (b) a more intense green light source is used? (c) violet light is used instead of green light? (d) the screen is moved further from the slit? (e) the green source is moved closer to the slits? 8 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 9 11.2 More evidence supporting the Wave Model of Light Interference of waves Interference of water waves was covered in year 11. Label these points in the ripple tank diagram as nodes or antinodes. Indicate whether the interference at each point is constructive or destructive. Complete the “How interference patterns are formed” worksheet on the next page. Draw the nodal lines and antinodal lines in different colours. Label the central antinode n = 0, and the other antinodes n = 1, 2, 3, … Label the innermost nodal line n = 1 and the remaining nodal lines n = 2, 3, .. Mark a point A0 on the central (n = 0) antinode. Determine the path difference at A0 in terms of λ. Repeat for a point A1 on the next (n = 1) antinode. Repeat again for a point A2 on the next antinode after these. Now work out the path difference for a point N1 on the first nodal line in terms of λ. Repeat for a point N2 on the second nodal line. and finally for a point N3 on the third nodal line. Can you see any patterns forming here? Rules for interference of waves • On a nodal line: path difference PD= (n−½)λ • On an antinode: path difference PD = nλ 9 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 10 10 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 11 11.2 Interference of light waves Perhaps the most conclusive experiment supporting the wave model of light was performed by an English physicist, Thomas Young, in 1801. He shone light through two narrow parallel slits and observed the pattern that formed on a screen behind the slits. If the particle model was correct, then a simple pattern consisting of two bright bands of light should have formed. However, this is not what Young found! The pattern on the screen in fact consisted of a series of bright and dark bands. This is a most interesting phenomenon. The pattern is formed by the light from both slits hitting the screen. Considering the dark bands then, it follows that these are the resultant of light from both slits adding together. In other words, when light from one slit combines with light from the other slit, the result is a dark region; i.e. light + light = dark! Again, the particle model cannot explain this phenomenon. You would not expect light particles to add together to produce darkness. Constructive and destructive interference of light The light that Thomas Young passed through the two slits produced an interference pattern similar to that produced by water waves from two sources in phase. The patterns that Thomas Young observed were interference patterns for light. They consisted of a series of bright and dark bands. These patterns of fringes can only be explained using the wave model for light. • The bright bands are the result of _____________ interference. • The dark regions are the result of ______________ interference. 11 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 12 The diagram below shows the interference pattern formed when light is shone through a double slit. Figure 1 At each of the bright regions on the screen (A, C, E, G and I), the light from each of the sources (S1 and S2) is in phase and constructive interference takes place. At point E on the central bright band, light has travelled equal distances from S1 and S2. The path difference at this point is zero. Crests from S1 will meet crests from S2, and troughs from S1 will meet troughs from S2. A double amplitude light wave (i.e. brighter light) is formed here due to this constructive interference. Explain in detail what is happening at point C on the interference pattern and indicating why this point is an antinode. Repeat again for point A. The general rule for constructive interference is: XPath difference = nλx where n = 0, 1, 2, 3, Now let us consider the regions in the pattern where there is darkness. On Figure 1, this refers to points B, D, F and H. At each of these points, light from S1 is again meeting light from S2, but the light is cancelling out to produce darkness! This is destructive interference. 12 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 13 Let us consider point D in the fringe pattern. Waves from S2 have to travel half a wavelength ! further than waves from S1 to reach this point i.e. the path difference is . This means that the waves are in 2 opposite phase as they meet and so destructive interference occurs here. A similar process applies at point F. Explain in detail why there are dark regions at points B and H. The general rule for destructive interference is: xPath difference = (n- ½ )λx where n = 1, 2, 3, … Problem: Red light of wavelength 620 nm is shone through a pair of narrow slits. An interference pattern as shown below is formed on a screen 2.5 m away from the slits. What is the path difference (in nanometres) at: (a) point A? (b) point B? (c) point C? Answers: (a) 310 nm (b) 1.24×103 nm (c) 1.55×103 nm 13 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 14 Factors that affect double-slit interference patterns You may recall from your study of Waves in year eleven that an interference pattern for water waves is affected by the wavelength of the waves and also by the distance between the sources of the waves. Sketch the nodal pattern for higher frequency water waves. Sketch the nodal pattern if the sources are further apart. It is much the same for light. A double-slit interference pattern for light will have fringes that are more bunched up (i.e. narrower bands) when: • • light with a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) is used, or the slits are further apart. Activity: observe double slit patterns formed by red and blue light. Sketch the patterns that you observe. Red: Blue: v Check out the 2-D interference (interactive) website. Homework: 11.2 1-9 14 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 15 11.3 Evidence Supporting the Particle Model of Light As the nineteenth century drew to a close, the wave model seemed to successfully explain the observed behaviour of light. The particle model was well and truly out of favour, especially since Young's double slit interference experiments. However, in 1887 Heinrich Hertz observed an interaction between light and matter that came to be known as the photoelectric effect. Further experimental work on the photoelectric effect by Phillip Lenard between 1899 and 1902 led Albert Einstein to conclude that light does in fact behave like a particle. The wave model could not explain the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect The experiments performed by Hertz and Lenard showed that electrons could be made to escape from the surface of a metal just by shining light onto the metal. This phenomenon became known as the photoelectric effect and it seemed to indicate that the energy in the light was somehow making the electrons in the metal escape. Lenard started off by shining monochromatic light of different intensities onto a metal surface in a vacuum. Bright light Dim light Photocell + + - Photocell e - e e Metal plate - Small I A flows Metal plate A Larger I flows When brighter light of the same colour was shone onto the metal surface, more electrons were released from the metal. As the light struck the metal surface of the photocell (see above), the electrons that had escaped were attracted across to the positive terminal thus causing a small current flow to register on the ammeter. Lenard found that as the light intensity increased, so too did the size of the current. More electrons were escaping from the metal when the light was brighter. Lenard also varied the frequency (i.e. colour) of the light shining onto the metal. He found that there was a frequency at which the electrons began to be emitted from the metal. This was called the threshold or cut-off frequency fo. Below this frequency, no emission occurred; even for very intense light. (See below). 15 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter XXX High intensity red light Dim red light 16 Photocell Photocell - + - + A I=0 Metal plate A I=0 Metal plate (ii) No photoelectric emission (i) No photoelectric emission Violet light Green light Photocell Photocell + - - - + e Metal plate e Small I A flows - Metal plate Larger I A flows (iv) Photoelectric emission continues (iii) Photoelectric emission starts (threshold frequency) Lenard investigated different metals and found that each metal had its own particular threshold frequency. He then modified the circuit so that he could work out the energy of the escaping electrons. Lenard reversed the battery so that it was now providing a retarding potential on the electrons. At small retarding voltages, many of the emitted electrons still had enough energy to get across to the opposite terminal. Photocell - - e - + e Metal plate A Small I flows Small retarding voltage 16 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter Lenard increased the size of this retarding voltage until all of the electrons were stopped from reaching the opposite terminal. This voltage is known as the stopping (or cut-off) potential Vo . 17 Photocell + - e e - A I=0 Metal plate VO This enabled the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons to be calculated: Maximum kinetic energy of emitted electrons : EK MAX = e.Vo Graphically, these results can be shown as: Light of the same colour Current Bright Medium Dim Voltage VO 0 Stopping voltage When only the intensity of the incident light is altered, the size of the photocurrent changes but the stopping voltage is unaffected. Higher frequency light Light of the same intensity Current Lower frequency light Stopping voltages 0 Voltage When only the frequency of the incident light is altered, the stopping voltage changes but the size of the photocurrent is unaffected. 17 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Lenard found that: Interactions of light and matter 18 o the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons was equal for both dim and bright light of a particular frequency; o the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons was dependent on the frequency of the light. For example, violet light ejects faster-moving electrons than green light; and o above the threshold frequency, photoemission begins immediately; even for extremely dim light. The wave model could not explain these results. Read page 424-5 of your text and explain what the shortcomings of the wave model were. Einstein's photon model It was Albert Einstein in 1905 who explained what was going on. Einstein suggested that light was not a continuous wave, but instead travels in discrete packets or quanta. All light of a certain frequency comes in packets that have the same amount of energy. These packets of light energy came to be known as photons. Electronvolts are often used in these calculations. 1 electronvolt = The energy of a photon depends on its frequency and is given by: Photon energy E = hf = where hc ë h = Planck's constant 6.6×10-34 J s = 4.1!10-15 eV s f = frequency (Hz ) ! = wavelength (m) c = speed of light = 3.0×108 m s-1 Homework: 11.3 1, 2, 4, 6 plus Photon Energy questions 1-6 (PTO) 18 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter Photon Energy 1. How much energy (in joules) does a red light photon of frequency 3.85×1014 Hz have? 19 2. A photon has a frequency of 2.0×104 Hz. (a) What is its wavelength? (b) What type of photon is it? (Refer to page 418 of your text) (c) What is the energy of the photon (in electronvolts)? 3. (a) What is the wavelength of a photon with energy 3.5×10-14 J? (b) What type of photon is this? 4. It is found that a neutron travelling at 1.98×104 m s-1 has the same energy as a photon of frequency 5.0×1014 Hz. What is the mass of the neutron? 5. The energy required to ionise an aluminium atom is 4.3 eV. Will light of wavelength 3.5×10-7 m be able to eject an electron from an aluminium atom? 6. How fast would a speck of iron of mass 1.75×10-6 g have to travel to have the same amount of energy as a photon with a wavelength of 4.62×10-13 m? Answers: 1. 2.55×10-19 J 2. (a) 1.5×104 m (b) radio (c) 8.2× 10-11 eV 3. (a) 5.7×10-12 m (b) gamma 4. 1.7× 10-27 kg 5. No, the photons have only 3.5 eV of energy. 6. 0.022 m s-1 19 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 20 11.3 Einstein and the photoelectric effect Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect was that each photon of light gave up its energy completely when it collided with an electron in the metal. The energised electron used up some of this energy in overcoming the binding force of the atoms in the metal and escaped with the remaining energy, EK. Photon with energy E Metal - EK The electron absorbs the energy of the photon, uses some of this energy to break free from the metal and escapes with remaining energy EK. The energy that the electron uses up to escape from the metal is called the binding energy or work function W of the metal. This quantity varies from metal to metal. Thus the maximum kinetic energy EK MAX of the escaped electron is given by: Kinetic energy of photoelectron EK MAX = e.Vo = hf - W Problem: Light of frequency 1.3×1015 Hz strikes a metal surface with a work function of 3.0×10-19 J . (a) Calculate the photon energy in joules and eV. (b) Calculate the binding energy of the metal in eV. (c) Work out the maximum energy of the escaping electrons in joules and eV. Solution: (a) Photon energy (b) (c) Binding energy Photon E = 5.3 eV Metal - EK = 3.4 eV 1.9 eV Electron in metal Answers: (a) 8.6×10-19 J, 5.3 eV (b) 3.0× 10-19 J, 1.9 eV (c) 5.6× 10-19 J, 3.4 eV 20 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter At frequencies below the threshold, the photons do not have enough energy to enable the electrons to escape from the metal. f < fO Metal 21 The energy of the photon hfo is less than the binding energy W of the metal, so the electron does not escape from the metal. No photoemission occurs. At the threshold frequency, the energy of the photon is equal to the work function of the metal. f = fO Metal Work Function: W = hf0 Photoemission begins at frequencies greater than f o . The maximum energy of the photoelectrons can therefore be found by using: Ek (max) = hf – W = hf - hf0 Graphically, the relationship between the energy of the emitted electrons and the frequency of the photons is: Maximum EK of Threshold photoelectrons (J) frequency Binding energy W 0 Gradient = Planck’s constant, h No emission below fO fO Above threshold frequency Frequency of photons (Hz) 21 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 22 Questions: Light of frequency 1.2×1015 Hz is shone onto a zinc metal plate. The energy of the photoelectrons emitted from the zinc plate is shown in the graph below (h= 6.6×10-34 J s). EK (max.) -19 (! 10 J ) 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Frequency ( 1014 Hz) (a) Calculate the energy of these photons. (b) Use the graph to find the binding energy of the zinc. (c) Use the graph to determine the maximum energy of the emitted photoelectrons. (d) Use the graph to find the threshold frequency for zinc. Answers: (a) 7.9× 10-19 J; (b) 5.9× 10-19 J; (c) 2.0× 10-19 J; (d) 9.0×1014 Hz. Homework 11.3 3,5,7,9 11.4 1- 8 22 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 23 Photoelectric Effect Problems 1. A certain metal has a work function of 6.4×10-19 J. What is the longest wavelength of light that result in photoelectrons being released from this metal? 2. The threshold frequency of rubidium is 4.87×1014 Hz. Calculate the binding energy of this metal in electronvolts. 3. Green light of wavelength 5.46×10-7 m illuminates a clean surface of calcium metal. The work function of calcium is 4.2×10-19 J. Are photoelectrons emitted in this situation? 4. Radiation of wavelength 2.86×10-7 m strikes the surface of a material that has a work function of 2.2 eV . Calculate the: (a) energy of the incident photons (in eV). (b) maximum energy of the photoelectrons(in eV). 5. Electromagnetic radiation of frequency 1.15×1015 Hz strikes the surface of a metal for which the binding energy is 4.99×10-19 J. Calculate the: (a) maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons. (b) threshold frequency of the metal. (c) cut-off wavelength for the metal. 6. Light of wavelength 3.0×10-7 m illuminates the surface of a material having a threshold frequency of 6.0×1014 Hz. Calculate the maximum speed of the photoelectrons emitted from the material (in km s-1). 7. UV light with a wavelength of 3.55×10-7 m from a mercury lamp strikes a clean metal surface causing some electrons to be emitted. The work function of the metal is 1.65 eV. (a) What is the frequency of the UV radiation? (b) How much energy (in eV) does each UV photon have? (c) What is the maximum kinetic energy (in eV) of the emitted photoelectrons? (d) What is the longest wavelength of radiation that will eject electrons from this metal? Answers: 1. 3.1×10-7 m 2. 2.0 eV 3 No 4 (a) 4.3 eV (b) 2.1 eV 5. (a) 2.62×10-19 J (b) 7.54×1014 Hz (c) 3.97×10-7 m 6. 760 km s-1 7 (a) 8.45×1014 Hz (b) 3.49 eV (c) 1.84 eV (d) 7.52×10-7 m 23 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 24 11.3 The momentum of photons – the ‘Compton effect’ In 1920, Einstein was still one of the few believers in the photon theory of light. Then an American physicist, Arthur Compton, conducted a series of experiments in the early 1920s that provided overwhelming evidence that Einstein was correct. Arthur Compton and Albert Einstein Compton found that when high energy photons (he used X-rays) collided with electrons, the electrons moved off with energy and momentum and the photons scattered or recoiled having lost energy and momentum. In other words, the collision could be treated like a simple mechanics problem involving two billiard balls. It was like an elastic collision between particles. Before collision After collision Photon 8 3 10 m s Electron at rest -1 - 3 108 m s-1 - v 1. Why doesn’t the speed of the photon change?? 2. The electron clearly gains some energy here. Where does this energy come from? 3. Which photon has more energy, the incident or scattered photon? What must be different about the incident and scattered photons? The collision with the photon has caused the electron to recoil and so we can consider the photon has having momentum (a very very small amount!). The momentum of a photon can be found by using: Momentum of photon p= hf h = c " CANNOT USE eV HERE! This interaction is known as the Compton Effect. Its discovery led to light being treated as a particle that had wave properties such as frequency and wavelength. ! 24 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter The momentum of a photon depends on its frequency and wavelength. 25 Question: Calculate the momentum of a photon of: red light (λ = 7.0×10-7 m) violet light (λ = 4.0×10-7 m) a gamma ray (λ = 3.0×10-12 m) A photon of violet light has a ________ frequency and a ________ wavelength than a photon of red light; therefore the violet photon has _____ momentum than the red photon. A photon that has more energy will also have more momentum when comparing two photons. Questions: In an experiment used to verify the Compton Effect, two beams of high energy photons were aimed at a crystal. Beam 2 was of higher frequency than beam 1. Beam 1: f = 2.0 1019 Hz Beam 2: f = 2.0 1020 Hz (a) Calculate the energy of a single photon in each of the beams. (b) How does the momentum of a photon in beam 2 compare with that of a single photon in beam 1? (c) Calculate the momentum of a photon in beam 1. If you were hit by this photon, would it knock you over? (d) If a photon in each beam experienced an identical elastic collision with an electron in the crystal, how would the recoil speeds of the respective electrons compare? (e) How will the recoil speeds of the different photons compare? Crystal -14 -13 Answers: (a) Beam 1: 1.3×10 J; beam 2: 1.3 ×10 J (b) Photons in beam 2 have ten times the momentum of photons in beam -23 -1 1 (c) 4.4×10 kg m s ; no (d) Electrons hit by a beam 2 photon will recoil faster (e) Both will recoil at 3 0 × 108 m s-1. 25 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 26 Wave-Particle Duality of Light The argument about whether light was a wave or a particle was eventually settled in the 1920s. The wave model explained refraction, diffraction and interference of light. The particle model explained the photoelectric effect and the Compton effect. So which model is correct? Light is neither a wave nor a particle. Light is light! Photons exhibit both wave and particle properties. This is called wave-particle duality. The behaviour of photons varies across the electromagnetic spectrum. Low frequency photons such as radio waves and microwaves exhibit distinctly wave-like behaviours such as diffraction and interference, but have no particle-like properties. Around the middle of the spectrum in the visible light region, photons have both wave and particle properties. They interfere and diffract like waves, and also interact with electrons in the photoelectric effect as particles do. At the high frequency end of the spectrum, X-ray and gamma ray photons behave much more like particles than waves. Indicate the regions of the spectrum where the electromagnetic radiation exhibits: predominantly wave characteristics predominantly particle characteristics both characteristics Homework: Chapter Review Q7, 8, 11, 12 ü Interference of Light and Matter website 26 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 27 Investigating the Nature of Matter Line emission spectra During the second half of the nineteenth century, scientists discovered that gases produce their own characteristic emission spectra. Many experiments were conducted where a gas such as neon or oxygen was excited using an electric current in a discharge tube. When light from the excited gas was analysed using a spectroscope, a distinctive series of lines was observed. Each element was found to have its own unique emission spectrum. It was many years before this well-known interaction between matter and light could be fully explained and understood. R V The emission spectrum for hydrogen has 5 lines in the visible region. Activity: use a spectroscope to observe and sketch the emission spectrum for: sodium, Na mercury, Hg Line absorption spectra In 1862, a different form of spectroscopy was used to show that hydrogen was present on the Sun. It was observed that when white light was shone through a particular gas, a distinctive pattern of dark bands would be seen when viewed through a spectroscope. Each particular gas seemed to be absorbing certain discrete bands of light. Again, each element had its own unique pattern of absorption spectral lines. R V The absorption spectrum for hydrogen has 5 lines in the visible region. In 1911, Ernest Rutherford, a New Zealand physicist, proposed a model of the atom that consisted of a small, dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by a large cloud of electrons. A problem with this model was that the orbiting electrons, because of their accelerated motion, should radiate energy and spiral into the nucleus. Clearly, this does not happen!! . Orbiting electrons Nucleus The Rutherford model of the atom. 27 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 28 28 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 29 Quantised energy levels in atoms−the Bohr model In 1913, Niels Bohr, a Danish physicist, suggested a solution to the problem. Bohr studied the emission spectra of hydrogen in great detail. He said that the electrons in hydrogen atoms should not be considered to be orbiting like planets. Bohr said that they simply existed outside the nucleus with certain amounts of energy. According to Bohr, the electrons in a hydrogen atom existed in certain discrete energy levels or quantum states. He said that: • electrons can only exist in one of these allowable energy levels, not in between. In other words, energy levels are quantised. • if an atom is given extra energy, an electron can move up to a higher energy level by absorbing an amount of energy equal to the difference between the energy levels. The atom is then said to be in an excited state. • when an electron in a higher energy level returns to its normal (ground state) energy level, it emits energy in the form of a photon. The energy of the photon (E = hf) is equal to the difference in energy levels the electron moves between, so: Photon energy Ephoton = hf = EM - EN where EM, EN = energy levels (eV or joules) h = Planck’s constant = 6.63×10-34 J s = 4.14×10-15 eV s f = frequency of emitted photon (Hz) Ionisation 5 4 etc Excited States 3 2 1 Ground State The Bohr model of the energy levels in an atom. The Bohr model helped to explain the spectral lines seen in emission and absorption spectra. These lines form when the atoms are irradiated with light in which the photons do not possess enough energy to ionise the atom as happened in the photoelectric effect. 29 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 30 According to the Bohr model: o the electrons in the atom can only accept particular amounts of energy. o the excited electrons will then move to a higher energy level (for less than a microsecond!) before returning to ground state. o in moving back to ground state, the electrons could drop back in one step or could drop back via any combination of the intermediate energy levels. o as the electron moves back, dropping from one energy level to another, a photon is emitted each time. The energy of the emitted photon is given by the energy difference between energy levels and accounts for one of the bands on the line emission spectrum. Metal vapour lamps, such as sodium lamps used for street lighting, work on this principle. They are known as narrow-spectrum discrete-line sources. The sodium gas in the lamps has energy levels that cause photons with wavelengths of 589.0 nm and 589.6 nm to be emitted when the atoms are excited. Sodium lamps therefore emit photons with just two discrete wavelengths in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum. These photons are from the yellow/orange region of the spectrum and give sodium lamps their characteristic colour. Bohr’s model could also explain the existence of line absorption spectra. When light from a continuous source, such as white light, is passed through a sample of a gas, the photons from the light source interact with valence electrons in the gas. In this case, the electrons only accept particular amounts of energy as determined by their energy levels. For example, if the element has an energy level of 5 eV, then photons with 5 eV of energy will interact with and give all their energy to the atoms. The evidence suggesting that these photons have been absorbed is a dark band on the spectrum. 30 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter Question 1: Several of the energy levels of an electron in a hydrogen atom are shown on the right. Ionisation 31 4 3 13.6 eV 12.7 eV 12.1 eV 2 10.2 eV 1 0 eV Ground State (a) What could happen if this hydrogen gas was irradiated with electrons with 14 eV of energy? (b) What could happen if the hydrogen was irradiated with a beam of electrons with 11 eV of energy? (c) What could happen if the hydrogen was irradiated with a beam of photons with 11 eV of energy? (d) (i) An electron in the hydrogen is excited to the n = 3 energy level. What are the energies that the emitted photons could have as the electron returns to ground state? (ii) Calculate the possible wavelengths of the photons emitted as this electron returns to the ground state. (e) Use the diagram above to determine the transition that will result in a photon with the lowest frequency on the emission spectrum. Homework: 12.2 1-9 31 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 32 12.1 The wave-like nature of matter In 1923 a French physicist, Louis de Broglie, made a radical suggestion about matter. Up until that time, scientists had considered electrons and the other particles of matter to be just that – particles. However de Broglie, for reasons of symmetry, speculated that since light waves could behave like particles, then particles of matter should behave like waves. Experiments that have been performed with electrons clearly show that they can diffract and interfere with each other. Protons and neutrons also have been shown to exhibit this wave-like behaviour. De Broglie suggested that the wavelength of a particle of matter could be found by using the same relationship that applies to photons; i.e. p = MATTER h . ! de Broglie matter waves " = h h = p mv CAN’T USE eV!! The wavelength of any particle is inversely proportional to its momentum. A fast-moving electron therefore has a shorter wavelength than a slow-moving electron. 8 -1 ! 1 10 m s 5 -1 1 10 m s A proton, due to its greater mass, will have a shorter wavelength than an electron travelling at the same speed. 5 -1 5 -1 1 10 m s 1 10 m s -+ Example: Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of these objects: (a) An electron (m = 9.1×10-31 kg) moving at 1.5× 106 m s-1 . (b) A marble of mass 0.050 kg moving at 6.0 m s-1. Solution: (4.8×10-10 m) (2.2×10-33 m) Question: Why doesn’t a marble diffract as it rolls through a 2cm wide opening??? Electrons do diffract as they pass through layers in crystals and atoms. Why??? Read about electron microscopes on page 442 of your text. 32 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 33 Electron diffraction patterns Louis de Broglie’s theory of matter waves was verified in experiments performed in 1927. G.P.Thomson fired a beam of electrons at tiny crystals. The electrons passed through the crystals and diffracted as they passed through the spaces between the atoms in the crystals. Distinctive circular diffraction patterns were formed. Electrons diffract as they pass through a crystal resulting in a circular diffraction pattern. Thomson went on and calculated the wavelength of the electrons in the beam. He then fired a beam of high energy photons (in the form of X-rays) with the same wavelength as the electrons at the same crystals. The diffraction pattern formed by the X-rays was strikingly similar to the diffraction pattern that was formed using the electrons. X-rays diffract as they pass through the gaps in a crystal. The similarity to the electron diffraction pattern suggests that electrons have wave properties. Since these early experiments, other particles such as protons, neutrons, hydrogen atoms and helium atoms have been used in similar experiments. These particles have also produced diffraction patterns providing further evidence in support of de Broglie and his theory of the wave-like nature of matter. 33 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 34 Questions: An electron is accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 1000 V. It then passes through a crystal in which the gaps between the atoms in the crystal lattice measure 2.0 "10!10 m. (me = 9.1×10-31 kg) - v Crystal (a) Calculate the final energy of the electron (in eV and J) after it has passed through this potential difference. (b) What is the speed and momentum of the electron as it reaches the crystal? (c) Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of the electron. (d) Will the electron diffract as it passes through the crystal? Explain. Answers: (a) 1000 eV , 1.6×10-16 J; (b) 1.9×107 m s-1, 1.7×10-23 kg m s-1 (c) 3.9×10-11 m (d) Yes, its wavelength is about the same as the gap size. Read Worked Example 12.1A on page 438 of your text. Homework: 12.1 1-8 34 PEGS Un it 4 Physics: Interactions of light and matter 35 12.3 Electron orbitals in atoms – standing waves!! De Broglie hypothesised that a particle such as an electron would have a wavelength. MATTER de Broglie matter wavelength " = h h = p mv Can’t use eV! If we assume that electrons move in circular paths around the nucleus, then it follows that an electron wave must be a circular wave. Also, for the electron wave to exist in an orbit, it must constructively interfere ! this to occur, the circumference of the orbit would have to be a whole number of with itself! For wavelengths of the electron wave i.e. nλ = 2πr. Look at Figure 12.19 on page 456 of your text. If the orbit’s circumference was not exactly equal to an integral number of wavelengths, then the wave would be out of phase with itself and the energy of the electron would not be one of the atoms energy levels. Only particular values of wavelength would fit the circumference of the orbit and so only particular energy values would exist. These are the energy levels of the atom and so atoms are quantised. Many years prior to this, Bohr had determined the energy levels of hydrogen. The theories developed by de Broglie were finally able to explain why these energy levels existed. De Broglie’s theory that electrons have a wave-like nature explains why electrons can only exist in specific orbits / energy levels. Atomic emission and absorption spectra are also evidence of quantum behaviour of atoms. We live in a quantum universe! Homework 12.3 1-6 REVISION: Chapter 12 Review and Exam-style questions Louis de Broglie 35