Western Washington University Woodring College of Education – Human Services Program HSP 495 Capstone 4 Credits Everett, Spring 2010 _____________________________________________________________ Instructor: Morgan Livingston Phone: (425) 259-8915 Email: Morgan.Livingston@wwu.edu Office Hours: Tuesdays 5-6 pm, Wednesdays 5-6pm, Thursdays 5-6pm or by appointment Address: WWU, Everett Education Center 2000 Tower St., Gray Wolf Hall 244 Everett, WA 98201 Meeting Time: Thursday from 6-9pm Course Description Must be taken in the last 5 credits of the major. Assess learning through seminar discussion and review of writing and portfolio. Finalize the student capstone portfolio through review and revision to completed benchmark assessment in relationship to National Standards. Course Goals Reflection on learning related to the Standards allows students to integrate rather than compartmentalize information from courses. In this course, Learners will complete the portfolio process introduced in HSP 304 and required by the major. Every quarter learners have revised their Capstone Essays. Learners will participate in seminar dialogue related to each standard and will provide evidence of meeting the Standards. Learners will revise reflective writing related to each of the National Standards to meet Program requirements for benchmark assessment. Course Materials American Psychological Association (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological association (6th Edition). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Human Services Program (2008/9). Student Guide to Capstone Portfolio Process. Council for Standards in Human Service Education, National Standards, available at: http://www.cshse.org 1 CSHSE Standards and Learning Outcomes Specifications Learning Outcomes Learning Assessment Activities #20: The program shall provide experiences and support to enable student to develop awareness of their own values, personalities, reaction patterns, interpersonal styles, and limitations. Participate in collaborative Student Guide to Portfolio Reflection on dialogue related to the Capstone professional self knowledge, theory, and skills Portfolio Process (e.g., journaling, development of a related to the national standards and the human portfolio, or service profession. project Demonstrate understanding of Student Guide to Portfolio demonstrating documentation of the Capstone competency), professional self and lifelong Portfolio Process learning through continued portfolio evolution. Finalize essays associated with Student Guide to Portfolio 13 National Standards, and the Capstone 4 University standards. Portfolio Process Finalize portfolio documenting Student Guide to Portfolio learning and presenting Capstone evidence related to learning and Portfolio Process professional development throughout the human services major and identify next professional learning activities. Demonstrate an understanding Student Guide to Portfolio of multiple voices. Capstone Portfolio Process Course Assignments Successful completion of the course requires that students demonstrate knowledge and/or skill in all of the following assignments. #1 - Participation and Dialogue – 5 points Seminar discussion becomes the basis for finalizing the Portfolio. Understanding is deepened by participation in discussion of the knowledge, theory, and skills acquired related to each of National Standards. Dialogue is expected to be thoughtful, insightful, and should reflect both critical thinking skills and knowledge of the subject. #2 – Provide Peer Feedback – 10 points a) Provide peer feedback on the portfolios of three other students in the format provided. Your feedback should be constructive and demonstrate critical thinking skills, and your understanding of the portfolio process. Your feedback is valuable for your peers in assessing their own learning, but it does NOT affect their grades. It is, however, part of the grade of the evaluator. b) Write a 3-4 page reflection comparing the portfolios that addresses: Styles of presentation (clarity, ease of finding information, holistic impressions, etc.) How the multiple voices required of human service professionals were addressed, Your impressions of the evidence included in the portfolio, and What you have learned about your own portfolio by examining the work of others. 2 #3 – Capstone Essays – 30 points Based on dialogue in class, course materials, and your own ideas, finalize the essays and discuss the points below: What you know about the Standard. Where and how you learned about the standard (courses, books, internship, etc.) Reference any evidence you have included in your portfolio that demonstrate your learning. What questions you have that might guide your future professional development. #4 Portfolio (finalized) – 50 points See Student Guide to Capstone Portfolio Process. #5 Summary of Learnings, Grade Recommendation and Rationale (2 pages) – 5 points GRADING CRITERIA Students participate in the learning community through dialogue, critical thinking, respect for the comments and thoughts of others, and the use of active listening skills. Writing mechanics are to be correct: grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. Content of writing assignments should provide evidence of the integration of information from a variety of sources, critical thinking, professional reflection, etc. Superior/Exceptional work is defined as follows: All readings and assignments are completed on time. Written assignments are word-processed and consistently exceptional in content and mechanical construction. The writing requires almost no correction and demonstrates a superior understanding of the intent of the assignments. Students express and verbalize connections among various readings, class discussions, field work, and personal experience. Students raise concepts, issues and questions regarding the reading in their assignments and their classes. Students consistently participate in a way that enhances learning for themselves and for the group. Behavior in class demonstrates a concern for the cohort as a learning community. Grading is not based on effort or improvement; it is based on quality of written output. Assignment or Participation #1 – Participation in Dialogue #2 – Peer Feedback and Essay #3 – Capstone Essays #4 – Portfolio #5 – Summary of Learnings Total Possible % 5 10 30 50 5 100 3 Grading Essays and presentations are evaluated in equal proportions based on the following factors: Comprehension Critical Analysis Depth and Breadth Creativity Clarity Punctuality Professional Presentation Point ranges and grades: Point Range 95-100 90-94 87-89 84-81 80-83 77-79 74-76 70-73 67-69 64-66 60-63 Below 60 Grade A AB+ B BC+ C CD+ D DF Superior Development Excellent Brainstorm! Strong Very Good Rain! Developing Good Light Drizzle! Under-Developed Not so Good Mist! Not Developed Not Good Fog! This course is a requirement of the Major in Human Services and must be repeated if a grade of “C-” or higher is not earned. See the WWU Catalog. The Incomplete Grade. K - POLICY The following statement regarding the assignment of incomplete grades is a synopsis of the policy in the Western Washington University General Catalog: The instructor may assign the grade of K (incomplete). It may be assigned only upon request of the student and agreement of the course instructor. Normally it is given only to a student who has been in attendance and has achieved passing grades until the final two weeks of the quarter when extenuating circumstances beyond the student's control make it impossible to complete course work on schedule. To receive a K grade, a student must obtain a contract form from the appropriate department and negotiate a formal agreement with the course instructor specifying the work done and the remaining work to complete the course and earn a grade. One copy is kept by the student and one by the faculty member. Normally, the student removes the K grade (completes the work agreed upon) during the next academic quarter. If the K grade has not been removed within one year, it automatically converts to a failing grade. Student Feedback Process. All students will be given the opportunity to formally evaluate the instructor and the content of the course at the end of the quarter. Ongoing feedback is welcome throughout the course. 4 Tentative calendar of course topics and assignments Week # 1: April 1: a) Review syllabus Week # 2: April 8: a) Review Student Guides Week # 3: April 15: a) Discuss Essays/Projects Week # 4: April 22: a) Discuss Essays/Projects Week # 5: April 29: a) Discuss essays for University Standards, such as, Critical Thinking, etc. Week # 6: May 6: a) Discuss Introduction, Philosophy and Purpose Statements Week # 7: May 13: a) Discuss finalizing portfolios Week # 8: May 20: a) Presentation of portfolios to class b) Peer analysis/feedback Week #9: May 26: WEDNESDAY 3-6pm a) Presentation of Portfolios to Public Week #10: June 3: a) Honoring the Accomplishment! b) Peer Feedback paper and Learning Summary papers Due University and Department Policies Confidentiality All clients should remain anonymous in all class conversations and assignments. Please provide a pseudonym and change identifying information when referring to a specific individual. Academic Dishonesty Policy Western Washington University students are responsible for reading, understanding, and upholding the standards of academic honesty as set forth in the WWU Academic Dishonesty Policy and Procedure (see Appendix D of the University Bulletin). Reasonable Accommodation Policy It is the policy of Western Washington University to provide reasonable accommodation to the known physical, sensory, or mental limitations of qualified individuals except where such accommodation would impose undue hardship on the institution. To request accommodation, student must contact WWU Disability Resources for Students at (360) 650-3844 or at http:www.wwu.edu/depts./drs 5 WWU Grading Policy Please familiarize yourself with the WWU Grading Policies on pages 34-36 of the 2004-2005 University Bulletin. Corresponding by email All students should use MyWestern accounts for official class and University email. You are welcome to forward your WWU email to a personal account. However, please make sure that the forwarding system works by sending yourself a test email. Many free email accounts do not notify the sender when mail has not been delivered. It is the student’s responsibility to determine that all email is being received. The safest path is to use MyWestern and check your email on a regular basis! Additional Resources and Recommended Readings Cambridge, B. (Ed). (2001). Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education. Doel, M., Sawdon, C., & Morrison, D. (2002). Learning, practice & assessment: Signposting the portfolio. London: Jessica Kingsley. Klenowski, V., (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Stefanakis, E. H., (2002). Multiple Intelligences and portfolios: A window into the learner’s mind. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 6