Combining survivorship and fecundity Life tables. Table of lx and mx Allow p projections j of population dynamics 0.5 Fertiliity (mx) Proportion Surviving (lx) 0.6 0.3 0.2 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Age Class R0 = Net Reproductive Rate Average number of offspring left by each female Can calculate from survival and fecundity for each age class R0 = Σ(lxmx) T = Generation time Average time from being an egg to laying an egg (being a baby to having a baby) Calculate from the timing of births and deaths T = Σ(xlxmx) / Ro r (per capita rate of increase) Overall birth rate – overall death rate r = ln(Ro) / T Critical Values X is the midpoint of the age class Counts are of females Births are of female offspring 0.0 15 Age Class In many cases, ignore males 0.4 R0 (net reproductive rate) T ((Generation time)) r (per capita rate of increase) 0.1 0.100 5 Important summaries of a life table are: 1.000 Combining survivorship and fecundity Annuals: annual, x=1, and T=1 Perennials: x varies with age class Life Table – see spreadsheet ln is the natural logarithm r > 0: grow r < 0: shrink In this case (US 1998), r= 0.02%/year 1 S.A.D. λ (Geometric Rate of Increase) IF lx and mx stay constant, a population will eventually reach a STABLE AGE DISTRIBUTION. Each bar will be a constant proportion of the bar above it Ratio of the population sizes at two different times λ = Nt+1 / Nt λ >1: grow λ <1 shrink Most appropriate when growth occurs in ‘pulses’ E.g., Yearly breeding season (deer, bears, annuals) The parable of the grain of rice Conclusions then λ = 2 Population will double Critical Values: If Nt = 1, and Nt+1 = 2, A survivorship curve summarizes the pattern of survival in a population Patterns of births in a population can vary from semelparous p to interoparous p Age distribution reflects the history of survival, reproduction, and the potential for future growth of a population A life table (lx and mx) can be used to estimate net reproductive R0 (net reproductive rate), λ (Geometric rate of increase), T (Generation time), and r (per capita rate of increase) Prince rewards the inventor of chess The inventor asks for “one grain of rice” on the first square of the chessboard Was this a reasonable reward? 2 on the second 4 on the third, And so forth for all 64 squares A) Yes B) No (How much rice will the prince give out?) www.sjgames.com Doubles each square 1 http://ncowie.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/grains-falling-on-a-pile-of-uncooked-white-rice_1.jpg 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 www.sjgames.com Doubles each square 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 10 4 10 4 http://ncowie.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/grains-falling-on-a-pile-of-uncooked-white-rice_1.jpg www.sjgames.com 2 Doubles each square 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 10 4 10 4 One grain =25 mg Halfway (square 32): 100,000 kg 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 10 1014 Total for 64 squares is 4 billion tons 13 1016 1015 1017 At 25 mg/grain / i = 2 billi billion ttons Global rice production in 2008: ~ 30 million tons 1018 http://ncowie.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/grains-falling-on-a-pile-of-uncooked-white-rice_1.jpg www.sjgames.com Living things multiply Population Growth With additive growth, the inventor would have 1+1+1… = 2,080 grains = 5.2 grams With multiplicative growth, 4 billion tons 1E+18 Grains of Rice 8E+18 6E+18 4E+18 2E+18 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecj768NinEo What elements of population growth does this show well? What elements of population growth in this do not show up well? 1E+21 1E+19 Grains of Rice On the 64th square: 9,223,372,036,854,780,000 grains (263) 10 11 10 10 12 10 8 10 9 Doubling 64 times 1E+15 1E+12 1E+09 1E+06 1000 0 1 0 20 40 Square 60 0 20 40 60 Square Arithmetic vs. Geometric growth 3 4