Title Author Year Length Ebook available? Audiobook available? Executive Summary Miles to Go for Freedom: Segregation & Civil Rights in the Jim Crow Years Linda Barrett Osborne 2012 110 p. No No Explores the time of legal segregation in the US from 1896 to 1954, including the source and purpose of such laws, the effects they had, and how African Americans resisted them. Cautions/Warnings Some instances of the n-word, though always presented as “n_____” and always coming from quoted material Features Timeline; primary sources; maps Illustrations Period black & white photos & illustrations on almost every page Key Structures Timeline (order of events), Cause & Effect (how did Jim Crow laws skirt national laws, what effects did they have, how did African Americans and others respond to these laws, how did resistance to these laws change them), compare & contrast (different regions of the US, official vs. unwritten rules about segregation) Key Themes Justice vs. Law – how laws can be used to achieve unjust ends; “separate is not equal”; codified vs. unwritten social rules; Vocabulary Jim Crow law; segregation; desegregation; integration; discrimination; prejudice; poll tax Preface (3 pages vii-ix) Summary: Purpose of this book is to explore the time of legal segregation in America from the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 up to the Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court Ruling in 1954: how did what freedom they had prior disappear, what was the impact of segregation on day-to-day life, was segregation restricted only to the south, how did federal laws conflict with state laws on the issue, and how did African Americans resist and fight back? Notes the unfortunate necessity of using the word “race” when such concepts are inaccurate and arbitrary. Vocabulary: Segregation Jim Crow Public accommodations Civil rights Connote Subjective Arbitrary Illustrations: African American children from the early Jim Crow era Questions: Describe what is being contrasted in the first two paragraphs. What important questions are posed in the third paragraph? What era does this book cover (what event starts it and what event ends it, according to the author)? According to the paragraph running from page viii to ix, what main topics will this book cover? What attitudes or opinions can you gather about the author from the first full paragraph on page ix? According to the author, what is the problem with using the word “race”? Interesting Topics: Author’s craft (what is the purpose of this introduction; how does she immediately contrast the past with the present; how does she inject emotion into the issue at the start; what attitudes and opinions are clearly guiding her efforts) Sequence of Events (students may need to create a timeline of US history with major events like American Revolution, Civil War, WWI, Great Depression, WWII, etc. marked on it – they will need to know when legal slavery ended, they will need to know there was a period of relative freedom before 1896, and they will need to see that this book covers 1896 to 1954) Further Research: Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution Introduction (pp. 1-13) Summary: Segregation was a system of laws that existed in the South from the 1890s into the 1960s and was designed to keep whites and blacks in separate facilities (public areas, businesses, etc.). These laws were passed at the state and/or city level. There was also more sporadic legalized segregation in other states, and there was discrimination of other kinds (in housing, education, and jobs) all across the country. Summarizes the events of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Right after slavery was abolished in the 1860s, the south started passing “black codes” that essentially enforced many of the same conditions as slavery did. In response, the federal government passed civil rights laws and constitutional amendments that guaranteed African American citizenship and voting rights to black men. For a couple of decades, rigid legal segregation did not exist. Blacks rode on integrated trains and were elected to political office and had voting power. Some whites who felt threatened by this situation joined violent terrorist gangs of white supremacists. Others tried to find legal ways to keep blacks from voting while still technically forbidding them to do so on the basis of race. Southern states began to implement poll taxes and literacy tests to keep frequently poor and illiterate black men from voting. And without their power to vote, they could not stand against segregation laws that started springing up in the south. Vocabulary: Segregation Discrimination Sharecrop Poll tax Illustrations: African American boy drinks from fountain marked “Colored.” Map of the US showing states where segregation was required by law, where it was prohibited by law, and where there were no laws Diner with separate entrances for “White” and “Colored.” African Americans swimming at a lake in a park set aside for blacks Lithograph with illustrations celebrating the Fifteenth Amendment Illustration of black men voting for the first time An elegantly dressed African American woman near the end of the 1800s during a time when African Americans were beginning to lose many of the rights the Civil War had won them Illustration depicts “Heroes of the Colored Race” including Frederick Douglass and African American senators Blanche Kelso Bruce and Hiram Rhoades Revels Questions: Like the preface, this introduction starts with a quote. How are these two quotes similar? How does this quote establish the main topic of the book and this introduction? Give some examples of places you have been this week where segregation would have been required by law if you had been in the South during 1890-1960. When this book refers to “The South”, what do those states have in common in terms of the topic of this book? Why is it inaccurate to say that legal segregation only took place in the South? Besides laws that required segregation, what other kinds of discrimination did African Americans face in the North, and in the South? What are some of the differences between racial segregation and racial discrimination? Why were conditions different in different states? On page 4, how does the author make the transition from the topic of “examples of segregation” to the topic of “how segregation got its start”? What was life like for black slaves before the Civil War? What was the main conflict of the Civil War, and what was its outcome? How did some southern states try to use the law to oppress African Americans right after the Civil War? What behaviors or actions were these laws designed to inhibit or discourage? How did the federal government respond? How and when did the federal government start to once again lose some control over how the Southern states were treating African Americans? What was life like for African Americans between 1870 and the 1890s? What kind of political power or influence did they have? Why did some white Southerners want to keep African Americans from voting? What legal methods did southern states use to suppress African American voting without technically doing it on the basis of race? Were African Americans the only ones affected by these tactics? Why did the federal government not stop states from using poll taxes or literacy tests for voters? What effect did this loss of voting power have on African Americans? Interesting Topics: Cause & Effect (how the struggle for states’ rights vs. federal control led to the Civil War; how abolishing slavery led to other attempts at subjugating African Americans; how a law like a poll tax or a literacy test leads to robbing citizens of their right to vote) Compare & Contrast (North vs. South, state law vs. federal law, legal segregation vs. non-codified discrimination of various kinds) Further Research: Freedmen’s Bureau Black Codes Thirteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Fifteenth Amendment Poll taxes & literacy tests Modern Voter ID laws – a kind of “poll tax”? The South (pp. 15-49, one long chapter with no subheadings; heading names shown are my own creation and based on my judgment about where topics changed) Plessy v Ferguson (15-18) – “Separate but Equal”: 1892 Supreme Court ruling declares that laws requiring segregation on trains are not unconstitutional as long as facilities are “equal.” o What was the sequence of events that led Homer Plessy to be arrested in 1892? o What was the argument Plessy’s lawyer used at his trial? What laws did he think were in conflict? o How does this case show the relationship between the legislative branch of government and the judicial branch? o After losing the case at the local level and the state level, what did the Supreme Court decide in 1896? What was their main argument? o One justice disagreed with the decision. What was his concern? o Compare/contrast the ideal of “separate but equal” with the reality of it. Segregation Laws Spring Up (18-20) - This opened the door for states to pass other segregation laws: trains, streetcars, schools, restaurants, hotels, theaters, libraries, hospitals and other facilities were required to be segregated in many areas of the South by 1915. In practice, segregated facilities were rarely anything close to “equal.” Other rules like curfews for blacks were also put into place. o What effects did the 1896 Plessy v Ferguson Supreme Court decision have on Southern states? o Besides passing laws requiring segregation on trains and streetcars, what other kinds of laws started passing? “Jim Crow” (21) – the written and unwritten rules about segregation were named after a blackface caricature from minstrel shows. At first it referred in a disparaging way to African Americans in general, and later it referred to segregation both written and unwritten. o Use quotes from page 21 to provide several definitions of “Jim Crow” and then pick the one that most likely refers to the overall topic of this book. Lynching & Other Violence (21-25) - Violations of unwritten rules could often result in violence or death, often by lynching, and were thus enforced by terror and fear. Blacks like Ida B. Wells and whites like Jessie Daniel Ames spoke out against lynching. o Jim Crow laws did not make it legal for whites to lynch blacks. How did so many get away with it? o How did this constant threat of violence keep Jim Crow society in place? o How did people like Ida B. Wells fight back against the practice of lynching? Unwritten Rules (25-27) – there were social “norms” about many behaviors that were not actual laws – which entrances to use, which drinking fountains to use. Some signs about segregation were posted according to strict laws; others were just posted by whoever wanted to do so. Blacks were expected to address whites with titles like Mr. or Mrs. while blacks were almost never addressed that way and were given nicknames like “boy” or “auntie”. o Besides official laws passed by local or state governments, what sorts of behaviors were expected of blacks by custom in the south during the era of Jim Crow? o What effects did segregation laws and discriminatory treatment have on the relationship between black and white Americans in the south? o Use quotes to support the author’s assertion that “Jim Crow turned politeness and manners upside down.” Fighting Back (28-29) – resisting the indignities and injustice of segregation took many forms: refusing to respond to anything other than the correct name, avoiding segregated facilities and events, and doing one’s best to get an education were some ways. o To reject Jim Crow was to invite death in the South at the time. Yet many African Americans were able to fight back or resist in small ways. Describe some ways in which African Americans refused to play along. Segregation in School (29-34) – Segregated schools were in no way “equal” in terms of quality or spending. Black children often got less schooling because they had to work to help support their families. Teachers made the best of a bad situation and students learned about their heritage and about the rights that were briefly better in the late 1800s before Plessy. Some African Americans were able to go to colleges such as Tuskegee University. o Create a quick graph comparing the so-called “separate but equal” schools black and white children attended. What conclusions can you draw from the graph? o Besides money, in what other ways were educational opportunities different for black and white children? o How might the limited resources for schooling affect someone when they became an adult? o What were some unique features of the schooling African American children received? o What were some college-level educational opportunities for African Americans? o On p. 34, which sentence is the transition between the topic of “segregation in schooling” and “segregation in employment”? Segregation on the Job (34-38) - There were jobs, chiefly skilled trades and professions, which were considered suitable for whites but unsuitable for blacks. Tiring manual labor on farms, in factories, in lumber mills and in mines were often the only choices. Wage discrimination was common. Sharecropping (growing crops on a white-owned farm and paying for the privilege with a portion of the crop produced) was common among black farmers, and because these farmers had to borrow money from their employers and were sometimes cheated by the white landowner, they were in constant debt. o What kinds of jobs could southern Blacks routinely get, and what kinds of jobs were they routinely denied? o What do the experiences of Leon Alexander and John W. Brown tell us about the issue of racial discrimination in the workplace? In what way did Brown “combat Jim Crow”? o Describe how sharecropping worked and evaluate its fairness. Segregation in Housing (38) - African Americans generally lived in poor, older and poorly maintained parts of town, sometimes without the same basic sewer services as white parts of town. Sanitation differences meant more disease in black parts of a town, and blacks had less access to health care. o Compare conditions in segregated southern towns as experienced by black and white citizens. Joining Together: Societies & Churches (38-42) – African Americans formed various kinds of societies for the purposes of socializing, providing help for others, and for mustering what political power they did have. The National Association of Colored Women was an example – mostly middle-class members helped improve the lives of the poor and advocated for civil rights and against lynching. Black churches filled similar roles. o What kinds of groups did blacks form in order to address needs that white society would not address? o How did black churches serve their communities beyond religious services? Not Just the Poor (42-47) – Blacks faced discrimination and segregation regardless of wealth or success and this served as a lesson or reminder about how inferior African Americans were. No amount of wealth could get you into certain restaurants or hotels. Even as late as 1949 a publication like The Negro Motorist Green Book was being produced – it contained lists of hotels and restaurants where blacks would be served. Mob violence was sometimes a tool to oppress the black middle class. W.E.B. Du Bois and others established the NAACP in 1909 to marshal political power and sue against segregation laws; most of the members lived in the north but there were several branches in the south. There were also integrated southern groups that opposed racism. o Describe some ways even wealthier African Americans were affected by segregation laws or discrimination. o Examine the illustrations and captions on page 44. What was the purpose of a publication like “The Negro Motorist Green Book”? o What message did attacks by white mobs against prosperous blacks send? What was W.E.B. Du Bois’s theory about this? o What was the NAACP and where was it active? What was its purpose? All-Black Towns (48) – There were a few all-black towns in the south. o What was unusual about southern towns like Eatonville, Florida? The North (pp. 51-75, one long chapter with no subheadings; heading names shown are my own creation and based on my judgment about where topics changed) Invisible Walls (51) – Segregation rules in the North weren’t as clear as in the south, and discrimination happened everywhere, whether it was part of written law or not. o What is the subject of this chapter, based on the first paragraph? o How is Springfield, Ohio used as an example of what Northern life was like for African Americans in the Jim Crow era? Why Leave the South? (51-55) – many left and headed north for better jobs, education, and general treatment (security of property and fair treatment in courts). A very commonly stated reason for leaving was the fear of physical violence. Two “great migrations” took place, mostly around WWI and WWII. o What were some reasons blacks moved from the South to the North? o Describe the Great Migration and how the World Wars were related? o Make a quick graph of the numerical data in the paragraph spanning pages 53-54. What patterns can you see? A Better Life? (55-56) - Northern states did not have most of the written laws requiring segregation. They didn’t have laws that kept blacks from voting. Salaries for blacks tended to be a little higher than in the south. Some schools were integrated, as were some businesses. There was still discrimination and unwritten segregation depending on the community. Some states had laws forbidding interracial marriage. o In what ways was life in the North at least potentially better for African Americans than in the South? In what ways was it essentially the same? Was it worse in the North in some ways? Schools in the North (56-60) – as in the south, there were some states that had official segregation rules; others allowed the individual school districts decide. Unofficial segregation often happened because housing tended to be unofficially segregated. The NAACP fought against segregation in schools. As segregation was outlawed in various places, white parents sometimes responded by pulling their children out of public schools. For black students who did attend integrated schools, discrimination from white students and teachers was common. o Describe some different scenarios that would result in segregated schools in the North. o What role did the NAACP play in the issue of school segregation? o Within a school that was integrated, what sorts of discrimination did black students face? How did they resist or fight for their rights? Employment in the North (60-64) – Migrations changed many blacks from rural farmers into city dwellers. Many jobs were unskilled labor. Unions sometimes resisted the inclusion of blacks into certain skilled trades. Wage discrimination was common – sometimes because they were relegated to the least skilled positions, sometimes simply getting less pay for the same work. Organizations like the National Urban League supported black labor and protested against unfair wages and segregated work places. WWI and WWII opened some industrial jobs, but the end of the war meant returning white soldiers came back and pushed them out. o Write the sentence on page 60 that is the transition between the topics of “Education” and “Employment”? o What kinds of jobs did migrating blacks leave in the South, and what kinds of jobs were available to them in the North? o Compare employment situations between blacks and whites in the north, on the basis of types of jobs and on wages. o What kinds of organizations were created to deal with the issues of unfair, racially-based employment practices? How did they fight back? o How did World War I affect black employment (and unemployment) in the North? o What were labor unions and what was their relationship with black labor? Black Churches (65) – Churches served as networking for employment opportunities and sometimes offered loans to start businesses. o Compare the role churches played in the African American community in the north vs. the south. Housing Discrimination (66-71) – Blacks moving into “white neighborhoods” were sometimes harassed by residents to get them to leave. “Restrictive covenants” sometimes dictated who could and couldn’t buy property in certain neighborhoods. Real estate agents might steer blacks away from certain houses. Income level often played a great role in indirectly segregating towns and cities. The NAACP helped blacks who protested against segregated housing and brought cases to court. Shelly v. Kramer in 1948 outlawed racebased restrictive covenants. Violent reactions like bombings and fires against blacks moving into white neighborhoods were not unusual. o Describe methods residents of some neighborhoods in the north would use to try to keep African Americans from living there. o What was a “restrictive covenant”? The Nation (pp. 77-107, one long chapter with no subheadings; heading names shown are my own o How does discrimination in employment lead to segregated housing? How does segregated housing lead to segregated schools? o What did the Supreme Court have to say about restrictive covenants in 1948? o What is the point of the story of Roscoe Johnson and his wife and why is it in the paragraph about the ending of restrictive covenants? Black Pride Movements (71-72) – Some blacks felt America would never treat them fairly and wanted to start a separate all-black nation. Organizations like UNIA started by Marcus Garvey advocated for black pride and black power. o Write down the pair of sentences on p. 71 that serve as the transition between the topics “discrimination in housing” and “Black Pride movements.” o Why did some African Americans think segregation was a good idea? o Who was Marcus Garvey and what were his ideas about how African Americans should feel about themselves? The Harlem Renaissance (72-73) – 1920s -- black artists, writers and musicians came together and prospered; this was another source of black pride. o A “renaissance” is a “rebirth.” In what ways was the Harlem Renaissance a rebirth? o What kinds of accomplishments is the Harlem Renaissance known for? Race in Politics & The Media (74-75) – Organizations like NAACP and National Urban League used magazines to reach African American communities; they sponsored studies about job and housing discrimination and held demonstrations and protests. o How did the NAACP help black communities stay informed about the political and social issues that were important to them? o How does the concluding paragraph on page 75 serve as a transition from one topic to another? What was the topic of these last two chapters as a whole, and what does this paragraph suggest will be the subject of the next chapter? Segregation in Government (77-79) – Summarizes various US documents that dealt with the issue of rights: the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the 13th-15th Amendments; and summarizes how the US went from a slavery nation to abolishing slavery to guaranteeing rights to failing to guarantee those same rights. In civil service/government job positions like the Postal Service and the Treasury, African Americans at first were not segregated or discriminated against. Segregation in government workplaces ramped up starting around 1913 under President Wilson. creation and based on my judgment about where topics changed) The NAACP sponsored meetings, protests and petition drives against these changes but they continued. o Compare the main purposes of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution with what you now know of the reality of life for African Americans during the Jim Crow years. (You may need to do some outside research for more details, but review pp. 6-7 of this book for the basics.) o Describe patterns of employment for African Americans in federal government jobs between the end of the Civil War through Woodrow Wilson’s presidency. How did the NAACP and other organizations react to Wilson’s policies? How did federal employers screen out African American applicants to keep them from getting positions? World War I (79-82) – Black soldiers were drafted like white soldiers, but kept in segregated units. Black units did not see as much combat and did not generally get the same kinds of assignments as white units. Black soldiers returning home after the war were quickly put back in “their place” and lynchings in the south and race riots in the north and south increased after the war. Blacks who had filled jobs during the war while white soldiers were away were often fired and replaced by whites after the war. o How did segregation and discrimination follow African Americans into the armed forces during World War I? o How did military service often affect African Americans? How were African American soldiers treated upon their return to civilian life, especially in the South? o What kinds of racial conflicts were happening in the North at this time? The Great Depression (82-84) – The “great migration” slowed during the Depression years. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal included government jobs, and Wilson’s civil service segregation policies were repealed. But many blacks had farming or labor jobs and the New Deal did not help much with those. Eleanor Roosevelt opposed racial discrimination and supported anti-lynching laws and later became part of the NAACP herself. o What was the New Deal and how was it supposed to help people during the Great Depression? What were some ways in which black citizens got less help through the New Deal? o What sorts of actions did Eleanor Roosevelt undertake to fight discrimination? World War II (84-90) – The NAACP supported a huge March on Washington rally in 1941 to encourage the defense industry to hire blacks and end job discrimination. Roosevelt responded with an executive order that prohibited job discrimination in the defense industry and federal government jobs. When WWII started, as in WWI black units were kept segregated and black officers were a rarity. Again black units mostly played support roles like construction, maintenance and supply. Some progress in seeing more combat was made – for example the Tuskegee Airmen. Some black women served as nurses, under a quota system until 1945 when quotas were removed, but were only allowed to treat black soldiers. Segregation in the military ended in 1948, after WWII ended. o How did the start of World War II lead to the “March on Washington Movement”? What was the outcome of that movement? o Describe ways the US armed forces used discrimination and segregation against African Americans who wanted to serve their country during World War II. o Who were the Tuskegee Airmen and what made them unusual and an important part of the African American struggle for equal treatment? Signs of Breakdown (90-96) – During and after WWII it became more and more difficult for white America to argue that blacks had to be put “in their place” when they did so much and moved ahead so far. Rallies and sit-ins were used to keep the issue of segregation and discrimination in the public eye. The Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) was founded in 1942 by and included both black and white members; they believed in using non-violent strategies and used sit-ins to try to integrate restaurants. Race riots continued in cities in the north and south. Some whites argued that black attempts to end segregation were harming the war effort. The notion of segregation as “patriotic” started to crack; one example was the integration of professional baseball, which had been segregated for years. 1946 Morgan v. Virginia Supreme Court case found that inter-state bus travel could not be segregated; CORE sent test riders on a “Journey of Reconciliation” to make sure this ruling was being upheld at the local and state level. o What was CORE and what did it do? o Describe a “sit-in” – why was it done, how did it work? o How did white segregationists respond to tactics like marches and sit-ins? What tactics and arguments did they use? o Describe how baseball was one example of “cracks” that were forming in the system of segregation after World War II. o What was the “Journey of Reconciliation” and what law was it meant to test? School Segregation Ends, Modern Civil Rights Movement Begins (96-107) – The NAACP’s Legal Defense and Educational Fund under leadership by Thurgood Marshall continued to fight segregation in education. They used the “separate but equal” argument from Plessy v. Ferguson to argue that when the state could not provide an equal facility, the only other option was to allow blacks into the white school. In 1950, Supreme Court case McLaurin v. Oklahoma found that a black student that had been admitted to a white university could not be treated differently (such as being seated in isolation) than white students. In the early 1950s, five states that required or permitted segregation in public grade schools were sued by parents and the NAACP. When the appeals reached the Supreme Court they were brought together as Brown v. Topeka KS Board of Education. Each of the five cases dealt with school segregation. One dealt with the fact that the so-called “equal” black school was in fact inferior in terms of buildings, pay for teachers, and transportation. Another dealt with the issue of proximity – black students had to travel a long way to get to a black school when a white school was nearby. The other cases had similar details. In 1954 the court unanimously declared school segregation unconstitutional. States, school districts, and many white parents fought back against this and resisted school integration. When it did finally happen, it happened slowly and painfully. The impact of the decision was to destroy the notion that separate could ever be equal and to establish that the 14th Amendment truly did require equal protection for all under the law. Decades of struggle, protest and resistance to the laws of Jim Crow had paved the way for the modern civil rights movement of the 50s and 60s yet to come. o What arguments did Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP use to try to end segregation in schools? o How was McLaurin v. Oklahoma a “step in the right direction”? o Describe the five lawsuits in different states that eventually were bundled together as Brown v. Board of Education. What sorts of conditions or situations did the plaintiffs feel were unfair or unconstitutional? o What words or phrases does the author use to create transitions in the text from one case to another (pages 100104) o How did the Supreme Court rule on Brown v. Board of Education in 1954? What arguments did they use to support their decision? o How did the press and the nation react to the decision? o How did abolishing school segregation lead to the end of other kinds of legalized and enforced segregation? o Look at the timeline on pages 108-109. Make a note of the events you remember or recognize from reading this book. Purpose: the purpose of students reading this book is to get them ready to more fully understand and appreciate the two other books in this project: Getting Away with Murder (which takes place right after the Supreme Court school desegregation ruling in 1954, and which relies on a full understanding of the north/south and written/unwritten contrasts of the time, as well as the understanding that racism was deeply embedded in government institutions like courts; but also that there was already a movement toward civil rights that had been growing for some time and that Till’s murder was a catalyst that pushed the movement forward), and Freedom Walkers (which takes place the next year and again relies on knowledge of legalized, enforced segregation in the south). The strategies and procedures learned during this book will help them tackle the next books more independently. Structure: there is a lot of cause & effect, problem/solution, and compare and contrast structure in this book. Many opportunities to analyze conditions for black vs. white, conditions in the North vs. South, existence of written vs. unwritten rules, use of violent vs. non-violent strategies, etc. Many opportunities to examine “how did African Americans address problem X, and how successful were these attempts?” Quotes: Many uses of quoted material in this book – from people who were there and were affected by the situation. These quotes are what elevates this book above a less “literary” non-fiction book – they are where the emotion comes from, where the personal connections are most likely to take place. Author’s Craft: Because this book is essentially three really long chapters and there are no section headings, the author makes extensive use of transitions. Finding the transitions and indeed figuring out where one topic ends and another begins makes this book a challenging read, but also provides an opportunity to examine different methods of making transitions.