Last Straws to the Civil War, Event #1:
Missouri Compromise (1820)
Pre-reading:
Compromise can be defined as a way of solving a problem by having both sides give up
some of what they want in order to come to an agreement.
A. Is it always good to compromise? Why or why not? Try to explain your views with
an example (real or made up) that helps explain your view.
B. Now read the background on the Missouri compromise.
The Missouri Compromise "A Balance of Power" March 3, 1820
The institution of slavery had been an issue that divided the United States for
decades before the territory of Missouri asked Congress to go from territory to
state in 1818. Since the Revolution in 1776, the country had grown from 13 states
to 22 and had managed to maintain a balance of power between slave and free
states. There were 11 free states and 11 slave states, a situation that gave each side
equal representation in the Senate and the power to prevent the passage of laws
they didn’t like. However, the free states had more people living in their states
overall, so they controlled the House of Representatives, 105 votes to 81.
In February 1819, Representative James Tallmadge of New York proposed an
amendment to ban slavery in Missouri even though there were more than 2,000
slaves living there. The country was again forced to figure out how to handle the
issue of the spread of slavery into new territories and states.
Southerners were mad at this proposal for two reasons.
1.
The South's economy was dependent upon black slavery, and 200 years
of living with legal slavery had made it a key part of Southern life and
culture.
2.
Many southerners felt that Congress didn’t have the legal right to make
any decisions about slavery for a state or territory. They thought the power
to decide whether to allow slavery was and should be in the hands of the
people in that state/territory, not the federal government.
For example, Senators like William Pinkney of Maryland suggested that the nine
newer states had the same right to chose or not choose slavery that the original 13
did. Obviously, northerners like Tallmadge disagreed and thought Congress did
have the power to make rules about slavery in new lands, and should use it. No
one could agree about what to do, and people worried that the North and South
would split apart right then when the nation was still very young.
Through the efforts of Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky ,"the great compromiser,"
a compromise was finally reached on March 3, 1820, after Maine also asked
Congress for statehood. Both states were admitted. Maine became a free state and
Missouri became a slave state. This kept the number of slave and free states equal
in the Senate.
However, the Missouri Compromise tried to create rules for slavery in future
states and territories, too. It created a line at the 36 30 longitude line, and stated
that all territory from the Louisiana purchase north of this line would be “forever
free”, and the land south of the line Could be slave land.
A strange choice: The Missouri Compromise line looks strange because it is at
the southern border of Missouri. So, even though all new states north of the land
were going to be free, Missouri itself was a new slave state north of the line.
Confused? Look at the map and it will be clear.
Fascinating Fact: The Missouri Compromise was repealed by the 1854 KansasNebraska Act and declared unconstitutional in the 1857 Dred Scott decision. More
on all this later.
Post Reading: On another piece of paper, answer the following questions.
1. What did the North get in this compromise?
2. What did the South get in this compromise?
3. Who do you think got the better side of this deal?
4. Look back on what you said at the start about compromises. Do you think this was a
good compromise to make? Why or why not?