Patient Participation Group First Report Delivered March 2012 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Aim of PPG The Patient Group will work with the doctors, other clinical healthcare workers and administrative staff at the surgery in order to improve services wherever possible. We will try to address the question of how to best deliver primary healthcare in this time of austerity: providing good “value for money”. In addition we hope to foster good relationships with the local community and engender an understanding by those on our patient list as to the pressures that the surgery is under. We seek to involve patients with decisions as to how the surgery operates and to seek their views in deciding which services to provide and how they can best be delivered to suit. Furthermore, it is important the members of the group have not only the patient population welfare at heart, but also the welfare of the future survival of the practice itself. We have communicated these ideas to the members upon recruitment. In order to involve seek views from a broader cross-section of practice patients we will run a local practice survey and engage with the Patient Participation Group to develop an action plan taking into account their views and opinions. Lastly we will collate the outcomes into a report that we will publish on our website. However, the GP partners have the final sanction regarding any changes that may be put in place as we are subject to contractual obligations with the PCT regarding the service we provide, as well as being limited by the funding available. Description of content and method of dissemination This is the Links Medical Practice’s Patient Participation Report, which has been published on our Practice website at www.thelinksmedicalpractice.co.uk; circulated to members of the PPG; advertised in the waiting room on our patient callboard and on the noticeboard as a poster; and also supplied to the South London Healthcare Trust, London Medical Council and Bromley Healthcare Community Interest Company. The full link address is: http://www.thelinksmedicalpractice.co.uk/website/G84003/files/survey_report. doc. A description of the profile of the members of the PPG In this section we aim to demonstrate the validity of the patient group by calculating how representative it is in terms of our patient population. We have performed the following quantitative analysis by calculating percentage differences between our practice population profile and the Patient Group profile. Our patient Group currently has members. However, it must be stated that response from patients to this initiative has been very muted, even withstanding the intensive recruitment drive we have pursued (outlined in the following section.) It seems that many view the PPG with an element of suspicion (despite assurances as to its anonymity and how it will not be taken 2 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE into account directly when providing their care) and also are concerned with the time that it may take to be a member. For this reason we have decided to make the PPG a virtual group as only three members expressed an interest in convening at meetings when asked at the outset in the new joiner’s questionnaire. We found that this was the only way we could ensure a healthy number of members. We take the confidentiality of our members very seriously so will not publish data on individual members. However, we have made every effort to be inclusive, especially in incorporating hard-to-reach groups in the decision making process. As such we do have at least one member who is housebound, who is a carer, who has made a complaint about the surgery, who has a disability and/or access issues, who is unemployed, who is currently employed. All are registered patients currently on the practice list. None are related to members of practice staff. The Group currently has 14 members 1.)Gender PPG profile Difference % Male Practice population profile 5042 2 36 Female 5033 12 As above PPG profile Difference % Under 16 Practice population profile 2420 0 23 17 - 24 1076 0 11 25 – 34 1584 2 15 35 – 44 1510 4 14 45 – 54 1422 1 6 55 – 64 1036 2 4 65 - 74 701 2 7 75 – 84 523 3 5 Over 85 289 0 3 2.) Age 3 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 3.)Ethnicity PPG profile White Practice population profile 10133 Difference % Irish 21 0 0 White & Black Caribbean 38 0 0 White & Black African 31 0 0 White & Asian 5 0 0 Asian or Asian British 7 0 0 Indian 44 0 0 Pakistani 2 0 0 Bangladeshi 12 0 0 African 386 0 4 Chinese 9 0 0 & Any Other 0 0 0 14 The steps we took to ensure that the Patient Participation Group (PPG) is representative of our registered patients and where a category of patients is not represented, the steps we took in an attempt to engage that category We have outlined the differences between the practice population and members of the PPG in the tables above. It can be seen that the differences between the profiles of PPG and practice population members are mostly not greatly significant, especially when taking into account the fact that some groups not analysed separately are also included as “hard to reach groups.” We have least one member who is: Housebound A carer Who has young children (under 18) Who has previously made a complaint about the surgery Who has a disability and/or access issues Who is unemployed Who is currently employed (Perhaps has difficulty attending the surgery during normal working hours.) Who is retired 4 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE All are registered patients currently on the practice list. None are related to members of practice staff. Unmarried and at least one who is married However there is variation seen between the groups, especially the following can be identified as showing a small difference: 1.) Gender – it has been difficult to recruit male patient group participants. We have therefore written and telephoned a random section of the population asking them to join, in addition to the recruitment drive below. We have also asked receptionists to ask male patients to join nut the response has been muted and we continue to look at this issue. Please see below for further information as we have tried to recruit more male patients to our PPG group and the Receptionist have been trained to continue to advertise the PPG to patients of different ethnicities. 2.) Age – Younger age groups in particular are not well represented, we have attempted to address this by recruiting members with young children up to those with teenage children. We have also sent randomized letters to these age groups and tried telephoning but to no avail. We have a very siginificant number of infant patients (0-4 years old) who lack the capacity to become a member of the PPG. Therefore we have attempted to engage with their parents. As such we currently have three parents with young children on our PPG. 3.) Ethnicity- we have tried to recruit black African PPG members (our second largest population ethnic group) by telephone, letter and by approaching patients in the surgery by have had no luck securing any joiners. Receptionists continue to advertise the PPG to patients of different ethnicities. Although this is so small as to be largely insignificant, we have nevertheless attempted to engage with any groups underrepresented by the following means: Displaying the Patient Group recruitment poster on patient chairs in the waiting room Having patient recruitment leaflets displayed and available in the waiting rooms – which receptionists have also distributed Having a patient recruitment posters displayed in the waiting rooms Asking receptionists and office staff to ask patients to join and handing out PPG literature, especially to under-represented groups such as those from the under-represented ethnic and age range groups listed above. Staff have been asked and trained in this and understand its importance to good patient relations. Sending PPG recruitment information to patients’ addresses which were randomly selected and also those who were from underrepresented groups or who fulfilled certain criteria (ages, gender or ethnicities) Advertising our PPG on the practice website and encouraging all to join. PPG membership was highlighted as both confidential and anonymous to both reassure and protect patients and so encourage more opinions. The practice manager has actively sought to include all sections if the 5 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE population in terms of age, gender, ethnicity and has also handed the recruitment literature to those who may have sought a meeting with her or had cause to complain. This has included attempts to be as inclusive as possible by contacting patients by post or by telephone who are from different ethnic groups, gender, age ranges, who are carers, who have young children, who are disabled, have been affected by psychiatric illness, who have or who are currently being treated for addictions or who are drug users, and who are housebound. We have attempted to encourage those contacted to join the PPG if they can and informed them that their views are valued. In total we have made around 40 telephone calls and sent letters to this end, as well as distributing literature to targeted groups in surgery, but the uptake has been extremely limited. We have advertised the PPG on the patient waiting room callboard to encourage more joiners from a wider cross-section of our population. We have asked those joining to complete a short questionnaire as to their gender and ethnic group so that we are able to monitor the inclusiveness of the group. We have placed a poster in the window by the opening times at either site advertising the fact that we are accepting new joiners. We have now made it standard practice to issue new patients with an information letter at registration to encourage greater patient involvement. We have discussed the issue of involving residential care home members with the staff of the care homes we visit and the care home managers, where possible. However, there has been a consensus that this is not currently advisable as patients in these care homes are either there for too short a time following their registration (home provides end-of-life care) or are elderly mentally ill home patients who may not be able to consent to involvement and who are not currently capable of participating. We have stated to patient group members the need to include all groups of patients in any decisions we make, including those with additional needs. In spite of these impediments, we shall continue to engage with patient care managers and patient relatives at these homes regarding surgery development issues. Asking PPG group members to disseminate information to others whom they know who may be interested in joining our PPG. The manager has identified long-standing patients who have had much contact with the practice to invite them to participate, and has attempted to be as inclusive as possible in selecting patients from as many different groups and sections of society as possible, for example: contacting our patients who are registered blind, registered as having hearing difficulties or with learning difficulties. Sadly, it must be stated that the response has been very muted from the practice population, even when receptionists have handed out PPG joining literature very few patients have actually responded to the offer and interest in it can be described as weak at best, even having a virtual PPG without requiring participants to attend meetings in person. Nevertheless we have kept all members informed as to the decision-making process and taken on 6 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE board all comments received by post, e-mail (by way of our secure NHS net e-mail address which is checked every weekday at least once), telephone or face-to-face conduct in surgery. This is a genuine attempt to listen to patient ideas and concerns. In fact several of the patients have been approached to join the group precisely because they have had recent complaints with the Practice. This illustrates that as a practice we are not afraid to listen to constructive criticism and this is an important point to note. Details of the steps taken to determine and reach agreement on the issues which had priority and were included in the local practice survey We have allowed the PPG to decide upon the areas that we to focus on for our survey as it would be too difficult to focus on more to start with. Those areas most consistently highlighted were: 1. Appointment system. 2. Prescriptions This was decided by asking the PPG members at initial registration as a member of the group(on the new joiners form) to state the areas they would like to focus on first for development and improvement. Two thirds of those replying stated the appointment system should be looked at, and 5 members also felt the prescription service was an issue that could be reviewed. They are both recurring themes not just in the PPG members’ views, but also taking in account other patient population members who have complained (we have analysed the complaints log and found these to be the most common themes) and in general day-to-day running of the practice contact with patients. In the comments and suggestions box in the waiting room we have also received comments focusing these areas. The National GP Patient survey also showed that our patients were interested in improving the access to doctors and being able to book appointments more easily. In the welcome letter sent out to patients who expressed an interest in joining the patient group we also included a brief rundown of information and ideas that patients may wish to highlight or discuss, and then waited for their response. Some of our members responded with excellent suggestions and ideas by email and letter and also to the manager whilst in surgery at brief one-to-one meetings, especially regarding access and discouraging “Do Not Attends” (where patients so not attend a pre-booked appointment), all of which we have discussed thoroughly in the action plan. The manner in which we sought to obtain the views of our registered patients We then undertook a patient survey based on the issues highlighted by the PPG as being of particular importance: prescriptions and appointment availability and system. Initiation plan: 7 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Recognize to ensure a good a healthy number of responses that the survey is short and simple to complete. Patient priorities- Appointment issues/prescription service highlighted by the group as they have signed up to the group This includes: Accessibility to book, Telephone lines busy. Open surgery, nonattenders, On-line booking capability Survey drawn up and circulated to members for comments- Version 2 and then 3 of the survey drawn up. Version 3 final circulated to patients at both sites and to members of the group based on patient forum members comments. Each version of the survey was sent by e-mail or post to PPG members to obtain their comments and suggestions, these were taken on board when replies were receives, again by post and e-mail and incorporated into the final version of the survey (version three.) Next phase - Obtain sufficient responses- 100 target agreed as being appropriate to be conducted over Autumn-Winter 2011-2012. Then to be analysed and reported back to the group for comments with a view to their proposing and agreeing an action plan Objectives and focal points of the survey The survey was designed to focus on two key areas of practice policy: patient access to appointments and demand by patients to be seen on the day. Our surgery faces considerable pressures in both of these areas as demand is extremely heavy and is indeed increasing. These two areas have also been highlighted through discussion with the PPG. The PPG were consulted at each stage of the survey’s design and their insights were invaluable to its development. It was decided after discussion with them that the survey would be too cumbersome and thus unlikely garner many responses were it to be about additional issues. The most pressing matter according to them, which also frequently crops up in complaints and during discussions between waiting patients and the Practice Manager (as well as that mentioned by GP Partners, locum staff and receptionists) is that of access to appointments. Appointment availability was also selected as the area for investigation for these reasons but also as Do Not Attends (DNAs) are so high at our surgery, a fact the PPG found particularly worrisome. By focusing specifically on these areas we hope to make real beneficial changes that will have a measurable impact (for example in terms of reduced DNAs and increased number of people cancelling appointments if they are not needed per month). Patient Survey Aims This report provides a detailed assessment and breakdown of responses gathered to the Patient Survey conducted in Autumn-Winter 2011-2012. They will, together with the views of our Patient Participation Group (PPG), be used in the development of our service. If appropriate and necessary we will implement changes to our operative procedures to best meet these patient demands. Ensuring Credibility 8 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE The local practice survey questions can be asked by paper or electronically, in the surgery or by mail depending on what is considered the best way locally to canvas the particular population. It is the responsibility of the practice to demonstrate to its PRG that the proposed survey or methodology it chooses as the vehicle for undertaking the local practice survey is credible. Criteria for assessing credibility include an assessment by the practice that the processes used for sampling and analysing are sufficient to provide “the reasonable person” with confidence that the reported outcomes are valid. This assessment and other evidence supporting the credibility of the survey process should be included in the report of the practice results. Survey Delivery and methodology In addition to consulting with our PPG, we have attempted to ensure our survey is as easy as possible for patients to complete by using a simple and short paper-based questionnaire with a choice of responses to circle. By this means we have made it as easy as possible for patients to respond and thereby increased the likelihood that they will do so. We have stated clearly at the top that responses should be made by placing a circle around the number applicable to their choice. Ample space has been provided on the survey for patients to make notes or suggestions if they so wish. Instructions as to how to complete the survey have been included on the front page, as has information regarding the survey’s purpose and how the date will be used. This has been kept as brief and clear as possible. The font used is large and clear with good contrast ink and paper. Pens are provided by reception for those completing the survey in the Surgery. On the other hand, no pressure is placed on patients to respond if they do not wish to. Objectives and focal points of the survey The survey was designed to focus on two key areas of practice policy: patient access to appointments and demand by patients to be seen on the day. Our surgery faces considerable pressures in both of these areas as demand is extremely heavy and is indeed increasing. These two areas have also been highlighted through discussion with the PPG. The PPG were consulted at each stage of the survey’s design and their insights were invaluable to its development. The Survey was initially drawn up and circulated to members for comments - Version 2 and then 3 of the survey drawn up. Version 3 final circulated to patients at both sites and to members of the group based on patient forum members comments. This version was approved and garnered appreciative remarks as to its quality. It was decided after discussion with the PPG that the survey would be too cumbersome and thus unlikely garner many responses were it to be about additional issues. The most pressing matter according to them, which also frequently crops up in complaints and during discussions between waiting patients and the Practice Manager (as well as that mentioned by GP Partners, locum staff and receptionists) is that of access to appointments. Appointment availability was also selected as the area for investigation for these reasons but also as Do Not Attends (DNAs) are so high at our surgery, a fact the PPG found particularly worrisome. 9 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE By focusing specifically on these areas we hope to make real beneficial changes that will have a measurable impact (for example in terms of reduced DNAs and increased number of people cancelling appointments if they are not needed per month). Usage of results, method of communicating report and plan of action The next phase was to obtain sufficient responses (100 being the target as agreed with PPG members) which we could then analyze and report back to the group for comment with a proposal of plans to improve the appointment system We hope to use the survey results to assess how best we can meet these requirements through liaison and feedback with the PPG. This report and its conclusions are to be communicated to patients via the Patient Participation Group (PPG) who will be e-mailed or sent hard paper copies in the post (depending upon their chosen method of communication). Any subsequent adaptations made to our practice will be formulated and delivered by way of an action plan devised and approved by the PPG. The results, any ensuing changes and subsequent achievements stemming from it will be announced on the Practice website: www.thelinksmedicalpractice.co.uk. Disseminating and advertising the survey Inclusiveness has been promoted through the following means: Displaying the survey on patient chairs in the waiting room with receptionists on hand to assist if necessary Sending copies to patients’ addresses which were randomly selected Advertising our survey on the practice website. The views the patients canvassed were confidential and are anonymous to protect patients and so encourage more opinions. The survey displayed this information prominently so as to reassure patients as to this fact and guarantee that it will not affect their care. The practice manager has actively sought to include all sections if the population in terms of age, gender, ethnicity and has also handed the survey to those who may have sought a meeting with her or had cause to complain. This has included attempts to be as inclusive as possible by contacting patients by post who are from different ethnic groups, who are carers, who have young children, who are disabled, have been affected by psychiatric illness. We have also attempted to encourage these groups to join the PPG if they can and informed them that their views are valued. We have advertised the survey on the callboard to encourage more responses from a wider cross-section of our population. Receptionist and administrative staff have handed out surveys to those attending surgery, especially those from diverse ethnic groups, age ranges, with disabilities or those with access issues. The advertising began before the surgery was initiated Of the PPG members who responded, all were able to use the survey and 10 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE understand its questions and layout. The suggestions made were followed and involved including a passage in the survey stating clearly that it was anonymous and how to indicate responses. Questions were specially selected and considered so as to provide the most reliable, therefore most valuable, results possible. This involved a vigorous checking procedure developed in consultation with a statistical sampling method outlined on the website: “Principles of Questionnaire construction” found at the web address: http://www.analytictech.com/mb313/principl.htm and in consultation with the DES booklet on: “Patient participation directed enhanced service (DES) for GMS contract: Guidance and audit requirements for 2011/12 - 2012/13 (April 2011). Prior to sending out the survey for initial checking by the PPG, the assessment of all questions involved checking that each satisfied the following criteria: Questions were not ambiguous – No questions were vague and where possible offered only clear, discrete options. For example yes/no responses and were close-ended. This made the survey easy and quick to answer and analyse. Questions were not leading – any hint of partiality and emotional rhetoric were removed from responses to leave them as clinical as possible. A balance was sought between ensuring patients knew what was being asked (i.e. describing what a telephone appointment was so they could say if they knew what one was) and keeping the questions clear and concise (not “advertising” the availability of such appointments) All possible responses were included – ample space given and notes provided to the effect that suggestions were all welcome Lacking bias – The questions tried to avoid prestige bias by removing as many mention to doctors or clinical staff as possible. Language was carefully vetted including omitting Descriptions (adverbs and adjectives) Questions were specific, only addressing one issue at a time so as to avoid any confusion of topics. This was further enhanced by splitting the survey up into four clear sections of clearly numbered questions. We tried to stop reference to past events that people may not remember (i.e. not asking if they had missed an appointment or booking). We have avoided negatives in each of the questions so as to ensure that people are not confused, especially when ill in the waiting room, pressurized, or pressed for time. We have avoided medical terms, professional language, slang or jargon but have kept to commonly used, standard English words. This survey will be translated or transferred to another format if necessary as are all practice documents. Publicity on this is on the DisabledGo website, online at our website, on the NHS choices website and is placed on a poster on the surgery notice-boards at reception. We have tried to be friendly and approachable in the survey to put respondents at their ease and gather more responses. This includes thanking them for their contribution with a personalized message and 11 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE signing off with the practice manager’s own name. We have been polite throughout all questions. We had included information in a short welcome letter, but this was dropped as PPG members found it to be off putting and more likely to discourage responses if they had to read a great deal beforehand. This view was taken into account and an opening welcome paragraph was preferred. The Links Medical Practice Patient Survey 2012 (V.3) We appreciate that most of our patients attend their appointments. However we are looking to try and reduce the number of patients who book and then fail to attend appointments. In order to do this we need to know why patients do not attend, and what systems we can put in place in order to reduce the number of wasted appointments. If you would kindly take a few moments to complete this survey it would help us with this greatly. Please circle the response that you agree with. Section A - Wasted appointments 1. How would you prefer to be able to cancel an appointment that you no longer require? 1. By telephone- leaving a message on a cancellation line. 2. Via Internet using Practice website. 3. By text message 2. If you have failed to attend for an appointment without cancelling it what was the reason? 1. Felt better – appointment no longer necessary. 2. Forgot all about it. 3. Appointment was made by the Practice and arrived by post – the time and date were not convenient or I did not want it. 4. Other- please state reason below 3. If the answer to the above question was number 2, would a text reminder message have helped? Yes No 12 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 4. If you failed to attend for an appointment did you make another appointment? Yes No 5. Did you keep that appointment? Yes No 6. Telephone appointments - Did you know that we have doctors’ telephone appointments available for queries regarding ongoing medical conditions and results queries? Yes No 7. Would you consider using telephone appointments for some queries? Yes No Section B- Open Access Surgery. 8. Have you used Open Surgery? Yes No 9.If you have never used open access surgery, please let us know your reasons why here: Reason 1. Reason 2. 9. If you have used Open surgery what was your experience? Good Bad 13 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 10. If your experience was bad please list two ways in which we could improve the service. 1. 2. Section C - Extended Hours Service Extended Hours appointments are available some Saturday morning and late evenings. These pre-booked appointments are primarily for patients who work and are unable to attend the surgery in the day or for workers who wish to bring patients with disability and mobility issues to the surgery in the car after work. 1. Did you know that the surgery have extended hours appointments available? Yes No 3. Have you tried to book an extended hours appointment? Yes No 4. If the answer to question 3 was yes was there an appointment time available to suit your need? Yes No 5. If you feel we could improve this service please let us know the changes we could make here: Change 1. Change 2. Section D – Practice Web Site www.thelinksmedicalpractice.co.uk/ Were you aware of the Practice website and the information it includes (prescription request services, details of appointments, practice services, breaking news and health information)? 14 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Yes No Do you or would you use this website to request repeat prescriptions? Yes No If it were possible would you use this website to cancel appointments? Yes No If you have any other suggestions as to how we can improve our appointment system do please comment below. 1. 2. This anonymised information will be used within the practice in an effort to improve patient services. The results of the survey will be released to the Practice population and Primary Care trust. Thank once again for taking the time to complete this survey. Julie Miller Practice Manager 15 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Details of the steps we took to provide an opportunity for the PPG to discuss the contents of the action plan The action plan was published online at our website address http://www.thelinksmedicalpractice.co.uk and PPG members e-mailed and sent postal letters advising them on how to view it and asking for suggestions and comments. All suggestions resulting from the survey were included and discussed in this Action plan. At each of the following stages, in addition to e-mailing and sending letters to PPG members, we have posted advertisements on the practice website and on the waiting room callboard advising patients on how they can access the action plan, survey results and participate in the discussions and join the PPG. The PPG were initially consulted on the proposed action plan through asking for feedback on the survey results, which were posted to all members, and a mixture of postal contact, e-mails, face-to-face brief meetings and telephone discussions were held to devise the action plan. The results were also used to generate graphs and pie charts to enable easier understanding of their import. Patient Participation Group suggestions received were ALL included and discussed in this plan, even where they could not be agreed to and reasons given as to why this was so. The final action plan was agreed by e-mailing the website link to the action plan to the PPG members and sending them an information letter by post outlining how they can access this action plan and how to respond. We asked for comments by telephone, e-mail or by post. We have also met with some members on an ad hoc basis briefly to take suggestions when they have attended surgery and taken any comments on board. Generally the response to our action plan has been very positive and we have received many comments including: 1.) How much open surgery has improved – the experience was so much easier and better; especially when one is not feeling well. 2.) How thorough and inclusive the action plan is 3.)How pleased they were with the hard work that has gone into it 4.) Looking forward to seeing the new nurse, especially at open surgery to help deal with some minor illnesses 5.) Glad that views are being looked at by practice and see that the where changes cannot be made it is not the practice’s fault 6.)How friendly the receptionists and doctors are and how great the care by the doctors is. 7.) Fabulous service at open surgery We have not currently received any negative feedback Details of the action plan setting out how the finding or proposals arising out of the local practice survey can be implemented and, if appropriate, reasons why any such findings or proposals should not be implemented We have tried to link the information on the actions taken as a result of the 16 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE survey and all subsequent achievement directly back to the original suggestions and survey outcomes as well as feedback from patients. Where we have not been able to take up the PPG’s suggestions on proposed actions, we have highlighted this along with our rationale for not following these suggestions at this time: we have taken the ideas on board, it is just that they are not currently feasible and we have explained why clearly. There are not currently any contractual considerations to the agreed actions. Action plan discussion The Action plan we developed has been agreed in consultation with the Patient Participation Group (PPG) and their agreement has been given to implement the changes through e-mail discussion. 1.)Wasted appointments: A number of solutions were proposed by respondents: Charge patients- after all dentist’s do- at the present time GP Surgeries are unable to charge patients who fail to attend for their appointment. Remove persistent defaulters from the Practice list. Currently patients who frequently do not attend (DNA) are written to or contacted by telephone and warned that they will be removed from the Practice List if they fail to inform the surgery if an appointment is no longer required. Certainly there are some patients who just to do not bother to contact the surgery and these patients can be written to and educated, however it is clear that some of these patients including families with young children lead chaotic lives and the very nature of their health problems are the reason that they fail to attend. Have a telephone cancellation line on which messages can be left. This is a facility that we are looking into. Text messaging reminder service- This is a possibility that again we are exploring. There will be the questions of patient confidentiality ( a matter that we take very seriously) and cost to be considered. Confidentiality in text may be overcome by leaving a very unspecific message e.g ‘A reminder that you have an appointment on ‘date’ ‘time’ without specifying what the appointment is for or where it will take place. One would have to assume that this would be enough information to jog the memory. Practice website cancellation of appointment facility. Many patients are still unaware that we have a practice website - This will be advertised more heavily via Flyers, Waiting room call board and information leaflet. This option is currently being explored as an option and would certainly be more convenient for patients as opposed to hanging on the telephone for some minutes. 2.) Open surgery Patients experience of open surgery remains poor. 17 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE We have tried the following in an attempt to improve this service: We have given patients an approximate time to come and sit and wait in surgery . This has reduced the length wait that patients have had to endure and we feel has given patients who want to go home and wait in the comfort of their own home with cup of tea rather than the unhealthy atmosphere of the waiting room. In the past when we have had packed waiting rooms with patients feeling unwell and children running around bored. Now the waiting time is reduced although some patients preferred the former system! There may be an issue that patients fail to understand the fact that different doctors are working at different rates and even more importantly that health care is not an exact science. Generally the doctors will try and deal with the patient’s problem even if the appointment time overruns. If patient has a number of interrelated issues that it is impossible to separate these will have to be dealt with. Most patients I am sure would appreciate this if they were in the consultation but are less understanding of this while sat in the waiting room. We do state one appointment one problem to try and contain the breath of the consultation but sometimes the doctor will halt the consultation and ask the patient to rebook for another time but this is not always acceptable. For example patients sometimes state the real reason for their appointment as they leave the room. For example the patient may be embarrassed or very anxious about their problem and it takes courage to raise the issue with the doctor. If once raised that problem is urgent and cannot be left for any length of time without investigation then of course the doctor will invite the patient to sit back down and continue the consultation. Of course a patient may be receiving bad news which cannot be hurried. 3.)Capacity of appointment system The number of appointments that can be offered are limited. The doctors have other commitments which are just as important a part of patient care as the face to face consultations. Examples of this work include: Nursing Homes to visit, Home visits for the very ill or housebound, specialised Team meeting for example Palliative Care (terminally ill) planning, Child protection meetings, baby immunizations and baby checks, Minor surgery clinics and diabetic clinics. There is also a vast amount of paperwork that the doctors have to deal with and if necessary respond to and act upon For example- reviewing results, hospital reports, discharge summaries, patients clinic letters making referrals to hospital, prescriptions (a vast area ) child safeguarding rand medical reports and certificates. Striking a balance to allow all of this work to be completed as well as enabling enough consultation time for patients is very important to the Partners of the Practice. 4.)Other suggestions to improve the appointment system included 18 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Patient education: An appointment fact sheet ‘ Is your appointment really necessary?’ explaining options that may be available that do not require a doctors appointment. This could include a paragraph on what a telephone consultation can be used for. Once again the PPG members are all thanked most sincerely for their kind assistance in looking into the matter of wasted appointments. The Action plan was also discussed at a meeting of Practice staff, at which also considered all PPG patient member feedback Action Plan – see next page 19 Patient Participation Group Action Plan agreed in response to Practice survey, Patient complaint themes and other service user suggestions Unfortunately it is not possible to implement all of the PPG member and service user suggestions and comments (as much as we would like to!) due to limited staff and funding resources but we hope that the action plan response will help to set out our first targets in order to improve our service to you. We will be beginning a new round of the PPG discussions in April 2012 when new suggestions and comments will be considered and proposals we have not been able to implement at this time can be reconsidered. Just to confirm that this an ongoing exercise and we are constantly reviewing and improving it so as best to serve our patients. Where we have not agreed with a proposal we have outlined clearly why this is not a feasible option. REF PROPOSAL 1 Initiate a system whereby patients can book appointments online BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL The main problem with this is that it Practice would have to be Site specific. As we Manager are a two site practice it will be difficult to ensure that patients go to the correct site and there will be a risk that they will travel (whilst unwell) to the wrong site, especially if they wish to see a specific doctor Members of the PPG have suggested this Survey results indicated this would be popular service Previous comment to this effect by a patient made in the past year Also some appointments are reserved for specific health requirements i.e. diabetic clinic, baby clinic, minor surgery. There is a danger that PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME NA Keep in mind for future development. We do hope to offer this facility in the future when the system is in place to vet and check requests more comprehensively – patient safety THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL patients may book appointments at the wrong time or day or with an inappropriate member of staff The Triage system is lost therefore we cannot assess the urgency or patient requirements of appointments – human contact is lost potentially endangering patients. (GPs themselves have expressed concern over this – for example of a person has chest pain and needs to be seen urgently) A significant proportion of patients have no access to a computer or cannot or do not use the internet, therefore would be at an unfair disadvantage in booking these appointments. Concern over security as passwords and logins would be required and the surgery cannot guarantee a safe connection at the patient’s end. PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME must be paramount. We agree it would be good to offer this service and will look into how other surgeries run it and into its success. We do expect to move to a new IT system – EMISWeb shortly in the next year, maybe with the advent of this new system and when this is up and running and in place we will reconsider if there is still demand. Loss of human contact when booking 21 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME (receptionist stating date and time and confirming that an appointment has been made) may mean that patients are more likely to DNA (not attend appointment). Prohibitive cost, this is an additional IT cost which we cannot fund at the moment. Dedicated staff required to be trained and employed – must be especially careful to monitor its implementation at first so that mistakes are not made in appointment allocation. Then it must be verified regularly all of which requires staff time and training (including employing dedicated staff), which we cannot finance currently. Patients may make appointments at times that are not appropriate – for example late evening appointments if they have persistently not attended at such times or have been aggressive to staff or other patients in the past 22 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice Manager to consult Practice IT Lead liaising also with information governance Hopef ully within the next two to three month (health and safety issues). Fairly new system so cannot compare with other surgeries to see how the system has fared (learn from others’ mistakes!) System must be complex to account for doctors nursing and care home visits as even when doctors are at work they are not necessarily seeing patient on surgery premises. Some patients have good working relationships with certain doctors and it would be a shame to disrupt the care they receive if they were to book into another doctor. 2 Initiate a text reminder service PPG members have suggested this both prior to survey and after viewing survey results To draw up consent form for patients and place it on the website Ensure that this is secure and that all information gathered is kept secure and is verified Ensure all people who have access to Hopefully reduction to DNAs or more patients remembering to cancel appointments if not needed, 23 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL Patient survey results indicate this would be a popular choice for patients ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME the phone sign consent form lead (patient security and data protection issues) s Draw up a disclaimer Draw up an information section for patients to refer to and understand how the system works therefore more appointments available. Ensure patients no to update details and that they can opt out at any time Research any other significant information to be included so as to protect and inform patients To ensure this complies with information governance Test system to ensure it works and monitor its function and reliability regularly Confidentiality in text may be overcome by leaving a very unspecific message e.g ‘A reminder that you have an appointment on ‘date’ ‘time’ without specifying what the 24 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice Manager NA appointment is for or where it will take place. One would have to assume that this would be enough information to jog the memory. 3 Publicise patient survey more by placing it in a more prominent place PPG member suggestion We would love to be able to put surveys, comments boxes and leaflets in a more central position in the waiting rooms. However it is an unfortunate fact that these objects can be used as missiles or be used threateningly be patients towards staff or other patients. So to safeguard the wellbeing of staff and other visitors and patients at the surgery we have had to move them to a less conspicuous position. We do apologise for this though and have tried to remedy it by advertising their presence with colourful signs and advertising their presence on our website by stating that we are happy to receive comments, suggestions or complaints. Encourage more patient involvement through advertising on website and in patient waiting room by way of posters 25 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL 4 5 BASIS OF PROPOSAL Remove some notices from the waiting room Publicise website more ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME PPG member request Previous complaints and comments made over the past few years We agree that there are an awful lot of Practice notices on the walls at either site and Manager and the Practice Manager and receptionists Receptionists do attempt to keep them updated and to a minimum. However, it is a contractual obligation from the PCT that we have certain notices displayed on our walls in order to continue to satisfy their requirements and to be eligible to continue providing a GP service and receive funding. We are inspected to ensure that we comply. The Practice Manager has asked other managers if they have any solutions. They have also have requests to remove some posters as patients and PPG members feel it is cluttered but currently we cannot remove many from the walls as they inform patients of their rights or provide important health information and advice. Ongoing Patient survey results indicate more Many of the following suggestions were from PPG members – thank you Within More patients next making use of coupl the website and Practice Manager with reception Hopefully keep the walls tidy and only required or relevant posters displayed 26 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL people would use the website had they known of it’s existence ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME for your ideas- team, prescription clerk and office administrators e of its services such month as fewer DNAs as patients s register for text message reminders Practice manager Next coupl To draw up an advertising flyer and place it on chairs in the waiting room to encourage patients to make use of this service Flyer to be placed in waiting room leaflet holders and advertised with a large notice above it To place a notice outlining this facility (briefly) on the patient callboard Receptionists/office staff/prescription clerk to tell patients of this facility if the opportunity arrives bearing in mind they are often very busy Draw up a newsletter with the website address displayed prominently Display website address on all practice literature and documents 6 Educate patients so as to use PPG member suggestion GPs will try to ensure patients who attend appointments for more than Appointments used more 27 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL appointments appropriately BASIS OF PROPOSAL GP partner and Practice Manager suggestion from day-today contact with patients Note on patient survey as patient suggestion ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME one problem are not able to come with a “shopping list” of complaints. Hopefully this will also help surgery times to be more regular and appointment times to be more accurate liaising with GP partners and with reception and administration staff e of wisely month Free up more s appointments for genuine appointments Less wasted appointments GPs not to issue repeat prescriptions in appointments if patient has forgotten to put a request in on time Text to be placed on the patient call board advising patients on how to use their appointment most wisely Fact sheet drawn up advising patients in how to use their appointment most wisely and when to consider not making an appointment if it is not really necessary that they see a doctor. 7 Reception staff/ Health care assistants to triage patients to eliminate PPG member suggestion Suggested by a survey We have been fortunate, after much Practice work and effort, to secure a new nurse Manager, GP who we hope will be able to see some partners patients to help the doctor at times NA NA 28 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL unnecessary appointments 8 Telephone Patients prior to appointment as responder ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME when the surgery is especially busy. Receptionists do triage calls currently (they would be unable to do this if appointments were to be booked online) however they have not received sufficient clinical training to make more detailed judgements. Likewise with HCAs, doctors have many years experience (at least 8 years of qualifying!) and often further medical training which cannot be replicated by other members of staff and would threaten patient safety - so we cannot initiate this idea at this time. However we would implement it if we were to develop the role of a nurse practitioner in the future, which the manager and partners are currently investigating and considering. PPG member suggestion Indicated as popular for Limited staff time and limited finances Receptionists available to pay them in order to afford and office administration this. – trained by Conti nue To keep reminding persistent defaulters and 29 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL reminder patients by survey results Requested by patients at receptionist ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE Could possibly be viewed as harassment or as overly intrusive by come patients. They may feel targeted. manager We do already work a policy of telephoning patients who are known to us as having difficulty in attending due to health / social issues or other problems or who have not attended their appointments in the past. However, we cannot really afford to employ dedicated staff to do this full time all the time for every patient. DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME those who have trouble attending appointments of the date and time of their appointment More phone lines required which we cannot afford currently, do not have the staff to answer them and do not have the space to accommodate them. 9 Do not send patients prebooked appointments: send reminder PPG member proposal both before survey and in response to Yes we will change our policy to request that patients book their own appointment at a time to suit them and advising them how to do this when we send letters advising patients they are Practice Manager. Within Hopefully a patients will week attend appointments booked at times 30 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL requesting patients book their own appointments 10 No pre-booked appointments/ All day open surgery everyday. More appointments to be available ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL survey results due an appointment or check-up at the surgery. Patient suggestion and comments made to reception and in comments box PPG member suggestion in response to survey and prior to survey results Unfortunately we only have limited resources available in terms of the clinical time available from GPs, nurses and HCAs. We cannot afford currently to employ any more medical staff so our focus is on cutting wasted appointments in the other manners described in this plan. We have considered only having open surgery but the doctors feel this would be extremely hectic and busy with long waiting times and aggravation caused to the people waiting, perhaps long periods to see a doctor. They could not see the doctor of their choice which would disrupt the doctor-patient relationship which is absolutely integral to patient wellbeing (and is therefore fundamental to the service we provide). No choice as to gender of doctor which is important to many. Cannot book appointment in advance PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME to suit them. Decision reached by Practice manager and partners NA Reduce wasted appointments in ways outlined in this plan 31 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice manager liaising with GP Partners Imple Hopefully mente reducing patients who do d not attend to lower numbers so cannot arrange transport or may be unable book an appointment if the doctor requests that the patient make a further appointment to see them – for example following test results or to monitor a patient’s progress. 11 Educate patients as to loss to practice if they Do not Attend (DNA) appointments/ remove persistent DNAs from list or fine them (as do some dentists) PPG member suggestion GP partner suggestion from contact with patients Response by patients completing the survey indicates this Place message on website, patient callboards and on patient newsletter. Advertise the number of appointments lost to educate patients We cannot remove persistent DNAs as we do not have the authority to do this unless the doctor-patient relationship has broken down substantially or there are other pressing reasons for removal of the patient from the list. Often, as some of the PPG members stated, there are underlying reasons (health problems or social problems) underlying many consistently-DNA patients (such as memory issues) so we would be reluctant to remove such patients as 32 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice manager to keep this chased up When Hope to install in more the future fundin g availa ble they are precisely the ones who may require our input and support. We would instead hope to make it easier for them to attend by way of reminders as outlined above. We cannot fine patients who do not attend appointments as we are not a private practice therefore cannot set our own “rules” as some private dentists may do. 12 13 Allow patients to cancel appointments on a dedicated telephone line / by text message Publicise telephone appointments PPG member suggestion Results of survey indicate this would be an option patients on our list may make use of This would mean installing a new telephone line, which we do not currently have the funding (or space) for. However, in view of the popularity of this proposal we will try to see if we can access funding for this idea. In the meantime we expect that by publicising the website facility to cancel appointments more patient will make use of this facility. Fact sheet on telephone appointments Practice Survey result Manager with indicates more to be written and displayed in the reception waiting room people could be made Next More patients month making use of these appointments 33 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL aware of this facility PPG member suggestion ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE Advertisement to be added to callboard team Website to explain purpose and availability of such appointments DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME regularly for certain problems and queries. Doctors may consider a telephone appointment is not suitable in all cases as it is not a substitute for a face-to-face consultation. 14 15 More telephone lines/ more receptionists to handle calls incoming Disabled access – Lower glass screen Suggested by survey result PPG members suggestion and comment in response to survey See above – funding not currently available but we will consider this as and when funding is available. We wish we had the funds and space and staff hours to offer this at once! In the future, were we to install a new system and were the funding available we would make more lines available. Member of PPG suggestion prior to survey Currently prohibitive in terms of cost but a notice is displayed in the waiting room and on the website alerting patients with different needs to ask for help if they require it. Staff to be reminded of disability training and Practice manager Next Better staff staff awareness and trainin understanding g day 34 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice manager, reception team NA awareness of different needs at the next staff training day to be held this year – this will include a part on better communication. Staff training manual on disability awareness will be reviewed and changes made if necessary. Any patient who feels they have more needs can ask at any time for more assistance. We are also on the disabledgo website listing our disabled access provision. 16 Reserved appointments for doctor’s own patients PPG member suggestion All doctors have access to patient medical records including test results and medication in addition to full medical history so if a specific doctor is not available for that day another may be seen without jeopardising your care. We will always attempt to let patients see the doctor of their choice if at all possible. Doctors have the facility to block appointments off in order to review patients. Other measures should free up more appointments for such patients use. Not currently viable as this could be too disruptive since some doctors may 35 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice manager liaising with GP partners NA end up only having reserved slots and no appointments available for that day to be booked or indeed there may be unfilled appointments. This could lead to an uneven or unfair work allocation and cannot guarantee that slots will be filled or that patients will use them. Hopefully the other measures outlined in this action plan will help free up appointments for this purpose. 17 Share care plans with patients PPG member suggestion Wherever possible and time permitting doctors will share and discuss their care plans fully with patients and will try to explain the steps they are taking to inform patients fully as to the outline their care will take. These are devised and based on certain criteria as well as their own clinical expertise and judgement. It is a practice requirement to complete care plans for certain patients meeting certain criteria (for example, to help prevent hospital admissions.) NA 36 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL 18 E-mail contact with doctors BASIS OF PROPOSAL PPG member suggestion Other practices do run this service ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE As well as concerns over security of e- Practice mail address, which would need to be manager and verified it would also be necessary for IT Lead each person who has access to the email account to sign a consent agreement, which may present problems. Our NHS mail is designed to be secure but there is no guarantee that the patient’s e-mail is subject to the same safeguards or protection. Patient information (often confidential medical information) may be put at risk. DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME On going Possibly to implement in the future with new EMISWeb system later this year. Feedback from other practices on success of this scheme and problems/concer ns. Patient safety concerns are paramount as medical queries are difficult to deal with if urgent by e-mail – partners may not be on duty 24 hours a day 7 days a week so there is a risk that urgent queries may not be actioned or progressed. We are having a new computer system implemented later this year which may allow these concerns to be addressed. In the meantime we will 37 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE REF PROPOSAL BASIS OF PROPOSAL ACTION TO TAKE/ REASONS FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING PROPOSAL PERSON RESPONSIB LE DATE PREDICTED DUE OUTCOME Practice Manager Comp lete consider drawing up comprehensive guidelines that advise patients on how to use such a service as well as liaising with other practices to see how they are attempting to address this issue. Also the GPs are extremely busy with care home visits, palliative care meetings, paperwork, test results, referrals, training etc as well as their own surgeries! 19 Practice website cancellation of appointment PPG feedback Patient survey Many patients are still unaware that we have a practice website- This will be advertised more heavily via Flyers, Waiting room call board and information leaflet. We have now implemented this facility on our website and hope that it is a better alternative to hanging on the telephone for some time. Reduce nonattendances 38 A summary of the evidence including any statistical evidence relating to the findings or basis of proposals arising out of the local practice survey To demonstrate that we have included the results graphs and survey results that were circulated to PPG members for discussion by e-mail and by post as part of our virtual patient group. Members were invited to respond with comments and suggestions to add to the action plan by postal letter, dropping a letter into the surgery, by e-mail or by telephone. We distributed 200 surveys and received 140 responses which is 14% of the practice population and can therefore be seen as giving reasonably confident results. Patient Survey results breakdown and analysis These are to be referred to by PPG (Patient Participation Group) members in order to contribute to the development of an Action Plan We have ensured a balanced response from the entire cross-section of our practice population by canvassing responses from patients in the waiting room, advertising the survey on the website, callboard and on notices in the waiting room, providing copies of the survey to those contacting the Practice Manager with other queries or complaints and also by sending out questionnaires by post to patients selected at random. As well as randomised patients selected we have also sought responses from specific patient groups in order to represent a diverse section of the practice population. We have posted questionnaires to those patients meeting certain criteria including: those from different ethnic groups, different genders and age ranges, with different access requirements (hearing or visually impaired), those with young children or who are pregnant, carers, those with disabilities, differing marital status or sexual orientation (where known), different religions and beliefs. The practice manager and staff have also distributed questionnaires to patients they have been in contact with (such as those who have made comments or lodged a complaint) and have invited at least five members of each of the groups above to join the PPG although the uptake has been low. We are continuing our recruitment drive and will attempt to address this throughout the year. You can respond by e-mail to the following address: Bro-pct.linksmedicalpractice@nhs.net Or alternatively by post to the Downham Site marking your envelope “PPG Survey Results” to the following address: The Links Medical Practice Downham Surgery, 27 Brook Lane Bromley BR1 4PX You are of course welcome to drop your response into the Surgery if you wish. All responses will be dealt with in strictest confidence and will be anonymised. THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 1. How would you prefer to be able to cancel an appointment that you no longer require? 1. By telephone- leaving a message on a cancellation line. 82 2. Via Internet using Practice website. 11 3. By text message 47 41 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 2. If you have failed to attend for an appointment without cancelling it what was the reason? 1. Felt better – appointment no longer necessary. 45 2. Forgot all about it. 59 3. Appointment was made by the Practice and arrived by post – the time and date were not convenient or I did not want it. 20 4. Other- please state reason below 42 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 3. If the answer to the above question was number 2, would a text reminder message have helped? Yes 63 No 27 43 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 4. If you failed to attend for an appointment did you make another appointment? Yes 46 No 24 44 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 5. Did you keep that appointment? Yes 63 No 27 45 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 6. Did you know that we have doctors’ telephone appointments available for queries regarding ongoing medical conditions and results queries? Yes 41 No 69 46 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 7. Would you consider using telephone appointments for some queries? Yes 77 No 33 47 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 8. Have you used Open Surgery? Yes 84 No 26 48 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 9.If you have never used open access surgery, please let us know your reasons why here: No need as yet 3 Did not know it existed 1 49 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 10. If you have used Open surgery what was your experience? Good 64 Bad 20 50 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 11. If your experience was bad please list two ways in which we could improve the service: Remove people with non-urgent problems 6 Stop service being misused 1 Long wait/Too busy 8 Prefer booked appointment 2 51 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 12. Did you know that the surgery have extended hours appointments available? Yes 79 No 21 52 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 13. Have you tried to book an extended hours appointment? Yes 38 No 72 53 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 14. If the answer was yes was there an appointment time available to suit your need? Yes No 21 9 54 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 15. If you feel we could improve this service please let us know the changes we could make here: Longer opening hours and more appointments 5 Regular advertised Saturday surgeries 1 Extended hours every day 4 See doctor of choice 1 Shorter waiting times 3 55 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 16. Were you aware of the Practice website and the information it includes? Yes 74 No 36 56 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 17. Do you or would you use this website to request repeat prescriptions? Yes 80 No 30 57 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 18. If it were possible would you use this website to cancel appointments? Yes 98 No 12 58 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE 19. If you have any other suggestions as to how we can improve our appointment system do please comment below. A fair proportion of respondents said they had no access to a computer 10 Penalise those who do not attend appointments 9 Ability to book appointments online 4 Difficulties with memory cause missed appointments: a text/telephone reminder would help 7 Book appointments by text 2 Publicise appointments and means to book them more 1 General positive comments about receptionists! (perhaps indicating we should stick to a “human face” at the front desk to welcome patients rather than machine to book in) 3 Extended evenings/more appointments 6 Fewer patients 4 No half day closing/more appointments 7 More telephone lines 1 Strike patients off list of they miss an appointment 2 Ration early and late appointments so they are only for those who can not attend at other times 4 59 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Why is surgery empty but then told no appointments? 1 More nurse appointments 1 First come, first served system implemented General positive comment about system 6 Worried about security of online website 1 60 Details of the action which we intend to take as a consequence of discussions with the PPG in respect of the results, findings and proposals arising out of the local practice survey See comprehensive Action Plan above Details of the action which we have taken on issues and priorities as set out in the Local Patient Participation Report See comprehensive Action Plan above where we have outlined the changes we have already made to our service, for example: Place message on website, patient callboards and on patient newsletter stressing importance of attending appointments and also allowing patients to cancel appointments online. We have also drawn up a mobile telephone and e-mail consent form online where patients may submit their details to obtain reminders as to their appointments and we are beginning to collect some responses. We are also collecting these details as standard practice from new patients registering at the practice (providing that they wish to take advantage of the service.) The Links Medical Practice opening hours of the practice premises and the method of obtaining access to services throughout the core hours These are available via leaflets in the surgery, are advertised on posters in the waiting room, are listed in the surgery booklet and are available on our website at the following address: http://www.thelinksmedicalpractice.co.uk/opening-times.aspx?t=1 Downham Surgery Normal Opening Hours The opening hours are Monday to Friday 8:15 am to 12 midday (with the doors open until 12:30 pm) & 1:30 pm to 6 pm except Bank Holidays when the surgery is closed and Tuesday when the surgery closes at midday. For details of what to do if you require a doctor please look at the ' what to do when we are closed section' of our website. There are out of hours appointments available to pre book for those patients who are unable to attend during working hours. The surgery telephones are off each day from 12pm to 1:30pm. Monday 8:15-10:30am Open Surgery 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Tuesday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments Half Day closure from 12pm Wednesday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Thursday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Friday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Saturday 09:00-10:20am Booked appointment onlySurgery is not open for queries or script collection on Saturdays or during evening surgery. THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE Mottingham Surgery Normal Opening Hours The opening hours are Monday to Friday 8:15 am to 12 midday (with the doors open until 12:30 pm) & 1:30 pm to 6 pm except Bank Holidays when the surgery is closed and Thursday when the surgery closes at midday. There are a number of out of hours appointments available to pre book for those patients who are unable to attend during working hours. Please contact the surgery for details. For details of what to do if you require a doctor please look at the ' what to do when we are closed section' of the website. The surgery telephones are off each day from 12pm to 1:30pm Monday 8:15-10:30am Open Surgery 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Tuesday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Wednesday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Thursday 8:15-10:30am Booked Appointments Closed from 12pm Friday 8:15-10:30am Book on the day 3:00-5:30pm Booked Appointments Saturday 09:00-10:20am Pre Booked appointments only Surgery is not open for queries or script collection on Saturdays or during evening surgery. Method of obtaining services when the surgery is closed - EMDOC services in Bromley EMDOC (or “Emergency Doctors”) is an out-of-hours GP-led service for you if you become ill outside normal surgery opening times and need to see a General Practitioner. Because we understand that you can become ill at anytime, we use this as a “deputising service.” It is run by associated GPs in Bromley to provide cover at all times and hours throughout the year. Please be aware that calls at night should be reserved for serious or urgent cases that cannot wait. If you need urgent medical advice when your surgery is closed, during the day, at night, weekends (including Saturday morning) or Bank Holidays, here is what you should do. Dial the EMDOC number given in your GP's answerphone message. Currently the EMDOC number is: 0208 676 3263 Explain clearly what the problem is to the EMDOC clinician. The EMDOC clinician will either: Advise you regarding a self-medication Advise you to attend a local A&E or Minor Injuries Unit Arrange for you to attend a local clinic Arrange for GP, nurse or paramedic to visit you Arrange to call an ambulance if necessary 62 THE LINKS MEDICAL PRACTICE If you suspect a heart attack and if chest pains last for more than 10-15 minutes, possibly with nausea and sweating, dial 999 and let the ambulance service know that you suspect a heart attack. NHS Direct If you require advice, and you are not sure if you need a doctor call NHS Direct who will be able to help you. NHS Direct is a phone service staffed by nurses and professional advisers giving confidential healthcare advice and information 24 hours a day. You can call NHS Direct on 0845 4647. Calls are charged at local rates. You can also visit NHS Direct Online at www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk for advice on healthy living, guidance on treating common health problems at home, information about many conditions and their treatments, and details of NHS services in your area. The Links Medical Practice extended hours access scheme We run an extended hours opening scheme to allow those who commute or who cannot attend through normal working hours to have access to the doctor at weekends and in the evening. We have Saturday morning (9am-12pm) and evening weekday appointments (to 7:30pm on Monday at Mottingham and to 7:30pm Wednesdays at Downham) available for workers convenience. These appointments are bookable. These are pre-booked appointments only and are with the doctor on the rota. The individual doctor you see will vary as the doctors work on a rota basis sharing the workload and our practice employs more than one doctor. We currently only offer pre-booked surgery GP doctor appointments or telephone appointments with a doctor throughout these hours, but look to provide a nurse service in the future were there to be a demand for it. 63