The EMAP-Model EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Gaining deeper insights on the information needs of exporting firms is essential for governments. It allows a better use of the limited governmental resources for export promotion programs. Very often, resources that are available for this purpose are not used in the most efficient way, leading to a situation where governmental funds and efforts are sometimes spent, serving no purpose. As the integration of public funds for export promotion has to take place in the commercial business arena, this study explores effectiveness of government export promotion programs on both governmental and firm level. This is done by means of the influence of Export Marketing Assistance (EMA) on Export Performance. This research paper attempts to explore the direct link between EMA and Export Performance as well as the indirect link between these two concepts through Export Marketing variables. First, the theoretical interrelationships between governmental EMA, Export Marketing and Export Performance are established in a theory review. After that, a conceptual framework and hypotheses will be derived from the literature study. This conceptual framework is named the EMAP-Model, establishing a point of reference for future research in the field of export promotion. A quantitative research amongst Brazilian exporters will be conducted to test the EMAP-Model. Next, analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data will be conducted to derive conclusions about Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in governmental EMA. Deze scriptie is afkomstig van: http://www.studiosus.nl Online Scripties & Verslagen -1- The EMAP-Model TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 1 INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Research Objectives and Problem Statement 6 1.2 Research Question 7 1.3 Conceptual Framework 8 1.4 Thesis Outline 10 2 GOVERNMENTAL EXPORT PROMOTION 11 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Export Marketing Assistance 12 2.3 Variables of Governmental EMA Programs 13 15 2.3.1 Information Provision 2.3.1a Publications 15 2.3.1bTrade fairs 15 2.3.1c Market visits 16 2.3.1d Customs related information 16 2.3.1e Contact Information 16 2.3.2 Financial Support 16 2.3.2a Loans 17 2.3.2b Guarantees 17 2.3.2c Project participation 17 18 2.3.3 Management Support 2.3.3a market research 18 2.3.3b Assistance in the establishment of foreign sales offices 19 -2- The EMAP-Model 3 EXPORT MARKETING AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Strategic Export Marketing Variables 20 3.2.1 Export Market Segmentation 20 3.2.2 Market Segmentation and EMA 21 3.2.2a Country Screening 22 3.2.2b Market Research 22 3.2.2c Market Entry 22 3.2.2d Positioning 23 3.2.2e Marketing Mix 23 23 3.3 International Market Entry Strategies 3.3.1 Factors influencing the choice of entry mode 23 3.3.2 Transaction Cost Theory 24 3.3.3 Market Commitment 25 3.3.4 Management Control 26 3.3.5 Market Entry Strategy and EMA 27 3.3.5a Exporting 28 3.3.5b Contractual entry modes 29 3.3.5c Investment Entry Modes 30 30 3.3.6 Summary 31 3.4 Tactical Export Marketing Variables 3.4.1 The Marketing Mix 31 3.4.2 Marketing Mix Adaptation 32 3.4.2a Product Adaptation 33 3.4.2b Pricing Adaptation 33 3.4.2c Promotion Adaptation 33 3.4.2d Distribution and Transport Adaptation 34 34 3.4.3 Summary -3- The EMAP-Model 34 3.5 Export Performance Measurement 3.5.1 Definition 35 3.5.2 The EXPERF-Scale 36 3.5.3 Summary 37 4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESES 39 4.1 Introduction 39 4.2 EMA and Export Marketing 39 4.3 Export Marketing and Export Performance 44 4.4 EMA and Export performance 46 4.5 Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in EMA 48 5 METHODOLOGY 50 5.1 Introduction 50 5.2 Research design 50 5.3 Data collection method 52 5.4 Sample Selection 52 5.5 Sampling Procedure 53 5.6 Constructs and measures 54 5.6.1 EMA Variables 54 5.6.2 Strategic Export Marketing Variables 54 5.6.3 Tactical Export Marketing Variables 55 5.6.4 Export Performance Variables 56 5.6.5 Classification Variables 56 -4- The EMAP-Model 6 DATA ANALYSIS 57 6.1 Introduction 57 6.2 Summary: EMA and its Implications 57 6.3 EMA in Brazil 58 6.3.1 Information Provision in Brazil 58 6.3.2 Financial Support in Brazil 58 6.3.3 Management Support in Brazil 59 60 6.4 Sample Population 6.4.1 Employees 60 6.4.2 Export Percentage 62 63 6.5 Data Analysis 6.5.1 Parameters 64 6.5.2 The Effect of EMA on Export Marketing 64 6.5.3 The Effect of Export Marketing on Export Performance 65 6.5.4 The Effect of EMA on Export Performance 66 67 6.6 Discussion of the Results 6.6.1 EMA and Export Marketing 67 6.6.2 Export Marketing and Export Performance 70 6.6.3 EMA and Export Performance 72 73 6.8 Limitations and Future Research 75 7 CONCLUSION 7.1 Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes of EMA Programs 75 7.2 Conclusion 77 LITERATURE LIST AND OTHER REFERENCES 78 APPENDIX I – QUESTIONNAIRES 82 APPENDIX II – RELIABILITY ANALYSES 88 APPENDIX III – STATISTICAL TESTS 93 APPENDIX IV – RESEARCH EVALUATION -5- 107 The EMAP-Model 1 INTRODUCTION This study will aim at a further integration of government export information with the information needs of exporters. As the terms Export Assistance, Export Promotion and Export Incentives are often used interchangeably, the definition given by Seringhaus (1986) will be used. Export Promotion refers to all public measures that actually or potentially enhance exporting activity either from a firm, industry or national perspective (Seringhaus, 1986; Diamantopoulos, 1993). Better targeting of information and a more efficient allocation of governmental resources for export promotion will lead to better export assistance programs, more export involvement and, thus, more export sales (Krick, 1995; Singer, 1992). 1.1 Research Objectives and Problem Statement The literature in the field of governmental export promotion has traditionally focused on the way in which firms had to behave in order to make use of governmental export assistance. (Czinkota, 1981) The flaw of this approach is, however, that it does not provide for an exploration of possibilities for governments to make their programs more effective. So far studies have pointed out relationships between the use of export promotion programs and firm characteristics like the stage of export involvement (Diamantopoulos, 1993), the size of the exporting company (Diamantopoulos, 1993), behavioral aspects of management towards governmental export assistance (Singer, 1994) and environmental factors (Wood, 2000). According to Crick and Czinkota (1995), research in the field of export marketing and Export Marketing Assistance (EMA) has come to a point where the need for a more longitudinal approach instead of a snapshot of requirements is needed. Regardless of whether firms should change their behavior towards export assistance programs, governments should gain a better understanding about the needs of exporting companies (Krick and Czinkota, 1995). Many attributes that are perceived to have performance improvement possibilities may be known to governments, but are not accounted for in the programs for export development and stimulation (Crick and Czinkota, 1995). -6- The EMAP-Model Following these indicators, the question of whether exports are promoted in the most appropriate way should be asked (Czinkota, 1981). The aim of this study is to create profiles of successful exporters that use or have used governmental Export Marketing Assistance (EMA). Company profiles of successful export information users will allow governments to optimize the allocation of export information to firms. In this way, Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in Export Assistance Programs can be identified. In order to determine profiles of exporters that made successful use of Governmental Export Assistance, their information needs and applications will be explored. This study will compare the offerings and the actual usage of governmental export information by categorizing EMA variables which are expected to affect export performance of firms on both governmental and firm level. By conducting a study along these lines, we will answer the following research problem: What are Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in Governmental Export Marketing Assistance? 1.2 Research Question From the discussion above, the exploration of which aspects of export promotion programs are most useful for exporters is pertinent. In order to do this, this study investigates which specific aspects of export promotion lead to the highest export success. The following research question can be asked: Research question 1: “How do governmental export promotion programs relate to information needs of exporters?” Answering this question will give us insight into the factors associated with successful export promotion. In order to do so a conceptual framework has to be built, which will be referred to as the EMAP-Model. -7- The EMAP-Model 1.3 Conceptual Framework The EMAP-Model represents the effectiveness of governmental Export Marketing Assistance on government, firm and on an outcome level. The model represented in figure 1 will act as the theoretical base for this research paper. To illustrate: EMAP refers to the effect that Export Marketing Assistance has on a firms’ Export Performance by means of strategic and tactical marketing variables. The EMAP-Model will form the basic clipboard upon which this study will be conducted. Government level Firm Level Outcome STRATEGIC EXPORT MARKETING DECISIONS GOVERNMENTAL EMA EXPORT PERFORMANCE TACTICAL EXPORT MARKETING DECISIONS Figure 1. The EMAP-Model The model in Figure 1 categorizes EMA information on both governmental and on a firm level. Governmental EMA variables are expected to influence both strategic and tactical marketing variables, which in turn result in Export Performance of companies. By using this approach, this study will present EMA variables for government-level and firm-level Export Marketing decisions. Furthermore the study will present variables for the measurement of Export Performance. -8- The EMAP-Model Additionally, this study will identify a qualification model for the outcome variables that will be addressed. By doing so, we will formulate a point of reference for the qualification of effectiveness of Governmental EMA efforts. These information variables are expected to be comprehensive with the proposed qualification dimensions in Table 1. By using this approach in combination with the EMAP-Model, Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in Governmental EMA programs can be defined and an insight into the effectiveness of different EMA activities can be acquired. To illustrate: a Qualifier for governmental export promotion is an aspect of governmental export promotion that is used by both high and low achieving exporters. A Success Factor is an aspect of governmental export promotion that is specifically used by high achieving exporters, whereas the low achievers do not use it. Obsoletes in governmental export promotion are the aspects that are actually offered by governments, but which are only used by low achieving exporters. A schematic overview of the analysis is given in table 1 below. High Performing Low Performing Exporters Exporters Qualifiers + + Success-factors + - Obsoletes - + + = Governmental EMA Service Element used by Exporters - = Governmental EMA Service Element not used by Exporters Table 1. Qualification Model of Governmental Export Information -9- The EMAP-Model 1.4 Thesis Outline In order to find answers to the research problem regarding Success Factors for Export Marketing Assistance (EMA) programs, this research paper will proceed in a theoretical elaboration of the variables in the EMAP-Model. In the next chapters, this model will be theoretically explained for the specific EMA categories on governmental level and for the Export Marketing variables on a firm level. After determining and explaining these factors, the concept of export performance will be explored, as it will be the dependent variable in this research paper. Once this theoretical base is established, the EMAP-Model will be tested in a quantitative study amongst Brazilian exporters. - 10 - The EMAP-Model 2 GOVERNMENTAL EXPORT PROMOTION This section will elaborate on the theoretical background for the EMAPModel. First, Export Promotion programs and their applications will be considered. By doing so, it will define key categories in governmental EMA programs that affect Export Marketing variables and Export Performance. Later, marketing literature will be considered, in order to create a measurable theoretical background for this study. Also the concept of Export Performance measurement will be addressed. 2.1 Introduction Seringhaus (1986) makes an accurate distinction in governmental information that is provided to exporters. The strong point of this study is the separation of governmental Export Assistance for marketing purposes from other activities in the business process of exporters. The structural measures of which Export Promotion mainly consists are: Tax Incentives, Technology Innovation Support, Export Financing and Insurance, Trade Aid Linkage through multilateral and bilateral channels and Export Marketing Assistance (EMA). For the purpose of this study, this point of view is convenient. It distinguishes very clearly between several main activities of Governmental Export Promotion. Following this structure, it becomes clear that EMA is only one aspect in the overall offerings of governmental export promotion program offerings. In this respect, governmental promotion programs should be seen as a resource for exporters. As stated above, export promotion refers to all public measures that actually or potentially enhance exporting activity either from a firm, industry or national perspective (Seringhaus, 1986). As the particular research field of marketing is relatively established, Governmental Export Marketing Assistance (EMA) will have the main focus in this study. It plays a direct role in the relations between a firm and its market (Seringhaus, 1986). In the following, agreement will be reached about specific EMA research categories. - 11 - The EMAP-Model 2.2 Export Marketing Assistance Governmental EMA comprehends direct and indirect promotion and service programs. Direct EMA includes standardized and customized market information and guidance on exporting and Export Marketing. Direct EMA is designed to enhance a firm’s competitiveness from exporting. It serves the purpose of reducing uncertainty in the process of decision-making. Examples of these Direct EMA services, given by Seringhaus (1986 and 1991) include: Research of specific foreign markets Seeking foreign contacts and representatives Publications Individual market visits Trade mission Market visits Financing Trade fairs Insurance for export Assistance in the actual entry of Assistance in establishing foreign sales offices transactions the foreign market Indirect EMA, on the other hand, comprehends all programs and services that are not specifically designed for export but could, nevertheless, generate future export benefits (Diamantopoulos, 1993). Examples of indirect EMA are activities related to: Productivity R&D Technology Innovation Support Manpower Planning Regional/ Sectoral Development Fiscal measures Besides the distinction between direct and indirect EMA, a distinction in information that is provided to exporters by governments can be made as well. According to their studies, Singer and Czinkota argue that knowledge needed for overseas expansion can be distinguished into two types. First there is objective market knowledge, which refers to knowledge that can be thought or obtained from secondary or primary sources. - 12 - The EMAP-Model Empirical knowledge, on the other hand, can only be learned by personal experience for it relies on personal involvement (Singer and Czinkota, 1994). Furthermore, the information that is provided in the form of EMA can be either customized or standardized. Standardized information is general information, widely available, particularly from secondary sources. Customized information, on the other hand, refers to data personally acquired through direct market/customer contact by firms’ staff (Diamantopoulos, 1993). The role that EMA plays can, thus, be distinguished in three respects (Seringhaus, 1986). First it aims to place risk and opportunities in foreign market into perspective, developing a broad awareness of export opportunities and to stimulate interest for export in the business community. Second, EMA's role of assisting firms in the planning and preparation for export market involvement is to stimulate a firms' interest in and commitment to exporting. Third, the role of EMA is to act as an external resource, to build knowledge and experience that is vital for successful foreign market involvement. 2.3 Variables of Governmental EMA Programs In order to derive research variables, this study will focus on the direct aspects of governmental EMA. Following Diamantopoulos (1993) it can be observed that a very accurate and clear reflection of direct EMA measures is given. According to Diamantopoulos (1993), measures to directly promote firm’s export competitiveness are threefold. First, there are government departments and offices that supply standardized and customized market information and advice on exporting in general or export marketing in particular. Second, programs that attempt to cover firms’ financial risk through insurance and finance arrangements can be identified. Third there are programs which render assistance to firms, ranging from awareness creating to actual market entry. The first measure is aimed at providing and facilitating informational requirements to improve firms’ export marketing decisions (Information Provision). The second measure is there to provide firms with financial backup in order to reduce risk in export operations (Financial Support). The third group of services also assists firms’ export operations, however through the assistance in the actual management process of export operations (Management Support)(Diamantopoulos, 1993). - 13 - The EMAP-Model For convenience of the model, these categories that distinguish governmental EMA programs will be used. Indicators for these information categories are represented in table 2 below. Although this list is not exhaustive, these information categories are assumed to give a good representation of governmental EMA activities. The following section will provide a further foundation and explanation for these factors. Information Trade Fairs Publications Market Visits Provision Financial Support Loans Guarantees Identification of Contact Import duties Information Project Participation Management Support Researching Establishing Specific Foreign Foreign Sales Offices Markets Table 2. EMA Categories and Variables - 14 - The EMAP-Model 2.3.1 Information Provision EMA by means of Information Provision to exporters will be explored according to the variables: publications on export matters, trade fairs, individual market visits, trade mission market visits, identification of import duties and seeking foreign contacts and representatives. 2.3.1a Publications Publications on export matters can be regarded as a very basic element in EMA. A publication, as a form of governmental information provision, is either a market guide for specific geographic locations, a market opportunity study, an export handbook or how-to booklets about trips and other publications in the field. By making use of publications, exporters can be assisted in locating opportunities, developing contacts and implementing export activities. By definition, publications generally contain information about market size, composition, culture, distribution channels and environmental data regarding the potential export market (Darling, 1985). 2.3.1bTrade fairs Trade fairs act as a good point of reference for this EMA category as they provide exporters and potential exporters with accurate contacts in a mostly specialized business sector. A trade fair can be defined as a dynamic event that attracts "state-of-the-art" exhibitors and visitors, creating an intensely competitive arena (Seringhaus, 2001). By devoting governmental resources to trade fairs, accurate information on export matters is perceived as a potential for EMA success. This assumption is expected to hold as exhibitors on trade fairs are challenged to make favorable impressions, to attract potential buyers to the booth, and to deal with visitors in an effective manner. Additionally, experience in trade fair participation significantly adds to potential success in the achievement of business objectives (Seringhaus, 2001). From this discussion it can be assumed that Information Provision by means of EMA for trade fair participation enhances the export process. - 15 - The EMAP-Model 2.3.1c Market visits Market visits are a more customized way of EMA. Here the distinction can be made between individual and trade mission market visits. Apparently the individual market visits are a more customized manner of EMA, compared to trade mission market visits. It can be questioned, though, whether individual trade missions are more effective considering that the chances for networking have higher potential in a group process of trade mission market visits. Market visits are believed to be a very good source of information for exporters as face to face contact with potential overseas customers is expected to lead to potential success in international sales and Marketing (IOMA´s Managing Exports, 2003). 2.3.1d Customs related information Identification of import duties and other customs related information can be regarded as an important form of export information provision as well. This holds true because trade offs in the management of the exporting process need to be made due to formalities that have to be overcome when entering foreign countries. 2.3.1e Contact Information Another aspect of export information provision in EMA programs is the exploration of business contacts and representatives. This process is, just like customs information, a standard procedure for governmental institutions that provide EMA. Institutions like chambers of commerce and the like, conduct these services on a daily basis. 2.3.2 Financial Support The second category of EMA that is distinguished in the EMAP-model is Financial Support. Financial Support as a factor for EMA mainly comprises the reduction of risk in the exporting process. Financing can be regarded as a crucial export marketing consideration, as the financial risk in business transactions increases when a firm internationalizes. Financing considerations thus play a major role in the exporting process of firms as different environmental conditions (such as political and monetary structures) create uncertainty for exporters (Crick and Czinkota, 1995). Due to these reasons, financial EMA is a form of export promotion that is often most preferred by governments. - 16 - The EMAP-Model The advantage of financial export support mechanisms is that the riskiest part of the export business, which is foreign sales receivables, is protected and that it stimulates exporters to engage in international transactions. Besides it provides protection of political and commercial risks, over which the exporter has no control. A third advantage of EMA by means of financing is that internationalizing through exports is encouraged as firms have a better possibility to make competitive offers. Fourth, potential markets are broadened due to lower export risk and, fifth, it creates the possibility of leveraging exporter accounts receivable (Czinkota, 1998). On the other hand, governmental financing might put firms at a competitive advantage, leading to unfair competition in the market. A balance should be found between supporting exporters financially and export subsidizing. Obviously the latter may lead to a distortion in international trade. Due to this reason, export subsidizing on a large scale should not have priority. Stemming from literature and practice, the following Financial EMA variables can be distinguished: financial support by means of a loan or in the form of a guarantee. 2.3.2a Loans In a loan, the government provides funds to finance the sale and charges interest on those funds on a stated rate. In these transactions, the government lender accepts the risk of the transaction (Czinkota, 1998). 2.3.2b Guarantees In a guarantee, a private sector lender provides the funds and sets the interest rate. The government will however reimburse the lender if the loan is unpaid. Thus, in the case of a guarantee, the government does not provide the funds but the risk protection (Czinkota, 1998). 2.3.2c Project participation Furthermore, governments provide financial EMA in the form of financial support for project participation in trade fairs and for market visits (AHK São Paulo, 2003; Seringhaus, 1986). Financial support by means of funding project participation is regarded as a variable as it is expected to lead to more export involvement of companies. Project participation does often have the form of a subsidy to lower the participation cost for potential exporters. - 17 - The EMAP-Model This form of financing can, thus, be distinguished for both trade fair participation and market visits (AHK São Paulo, 2003; Seringhaus, 1986). 2.3.3 Management Support Governmental export promotion in the form of management support is a relatively new phenomenon. The reason for this is that international market liberalization in the second half of the 20th century has made governments more pragmatic to the business arena. Management support by governments is however received with skepticism, as companies fear a loss of control in their own business process. Besides do most governmental and semi-governmental organizations, which engage in the process of export promotion, lack the organizational structure to directly support management in exporting (Crick and Czinkota, 1995; Czinkota. 1996; Rattink, 2002). Export related problem areas comprehend logistics, legal procedures, export servicing, sales promotion and foreign market intelligence (Czinkota, 1996). In this respect, this study selects the following variables of governmental EMA for management support: specific market research and the establishment of sales offices abroad. 2.3.3a Market Research Marketing research activities contain the search for market information and thus create a direct point of reference with governmental EMA programs. It can be defined as the informational needs of the forecasting task to provide guidance of how to gather, collect, and report data relevant to marketing decision making (Boyd, 2002). Gathering data and information, in this respect, is crucial for the internationalization process of the firm as the external environmental factors in the process of exporting do strongly influence the choices that have to be made by exporters. The assessment across different types of markets determines the degree of success or failure achieved in the international arena (Wood and Robertson, 2000). Market research can vary from very customized to very standardized, depending on the focus of the governmental institution and on the nature of the requesting firm. Generally, however, the governmental institution helps managers to streamline the process of finding a suitable business partner, by means of matchmaking (AHK São Paulo, 2003). - 18 - The EMAP-Model Furthermore can market research be used in the exploration of market potential and for the purpose of forecasting sales for both new and existing products and services of a firm. An estimate of market potential often serves as a starting point for preparing a sales forecast. In addition to that is the size of the market that is actually penetrated very relevant for firms as well, as size and market share are determinant for the effectiveness of particular marketing actions (Boyd, 2002). 2.3.3b Assistance in the establishment of foreign sales offices Export Marketing Assistance in establishing foreign sales offices is another way of Management Support. By doing so, a government can support management of exporting firms in the actual entry of the foreign market. Consideration about renting real estate, employing foreign personnel and thus legal issues can be overcome in this way (Seringhaus, 1986, AHK-São Paulo, 2003). - 19 - The EMAP-Model 3 EXPORT MARKETING AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction Now that an approach for a qualification of governmental export information is defined, this study will proceed by elaborating on specific export marketing variables that are comprehensive with the proposed classification model. According to the EMAP-Model particular Governmental EMA activities have an influence on marketing decisions of exporters, which in turn affect Export Performance. Support for this view can be found in marketing literature for both strategic and tactical marketing considerations (Crick and Czinkota, 1995; Papadopoulos, 2002). Next to this indirect link, the EMAP-Model also states a direct relationship between EMA and Export Performance. This section will provide further support for the EMAP-model, focusing on three main concepts: Strategic Export Marketing, Tactical Export Marketing and Export Performance. 3.2 Strategic Export Marketing Variables International Market Selection is said to be the first and most important step in export strategy, making it a critical success factor for both small exporters and mature multinational firms (Papadopoulos, 2002). Besides the strategy that a firm uses to enter a foreign market is of crucial importance for export success (Zahn, 1999). Strategic marketing considerations are aspects that deserve special attention in the exploration of governmental EMA effectiveness (Papadopoulos, 2002). For this matter, the strategic marketing concepts of market segmentation strategies and market entry strategies will be explored. 3.2.1 Export Market Segmentation To start out our discussion of strategic export marketing, the basic concept of market segmentation will first be evaluated. After a general understanding on the concept is acquired, we will elaborate on the specific market segmentation variables that exporters encounter on the international market. Segmentation decisions are amongst the most important decisions in the business process of a company that internationalizes. Whereas tactical decisions like pricing policies can relatively easily be changed, strategic (segmentation) decisions are far more difficult to redress. - 20 - The EMAP-Model Strategic considerations that the firm has to keep track of are the selection of a target/ product market, the goals of the target market, the mode of entry, time of entry and a control system to monitor the performance in the entered market (Kotabe, 1998). Market Segmentation is the process by which a market is divided in distinct subsets of customers with similar needs and characteristics that lead them to respond in similar ways to a particular product offering and marketing program (Boyd, 2002). As can be derived from marketing literature, market segments can be defined by means of several characteristics. These characteristics are demographic descriptors, geographic descriptors and behavioral descriptors of market segments. In Export Marketing, geographic descriptors are most relevant. Market segments are often geographically described as different locations vary in several respects. To illustrate: different geographic locations can easily generate different sales potential, growth rates, customer needs, cultures, climates, service needs and competitive structures. Furthermore are varying purchase rates very often a reason for geographical market segmentation (Boyd, 2002). The advantages that market segmentation brings to companies are opportunities for new product development, enhanced marketing programs through homogeneous groups of customers and a strategic allocation of marketing resources (Boyd, 2002). 3.2.2 Market Segmentation and EMA According to Kotabe (1998), market segments should be measurable, sizable, accessible, actionable, posses a competitive intensity and have growth potential (Kotabe, 1998). The main reasons for applying market segmentation in international markets can theoretically be identified according to five factors which are: Country Screening, Global Market Research, Entry Decisions, Positioning Strategy and Marketing Mix Policy (Kotabe, 1998). According to these factors, the EMAP-Model relates Governmental EMA to Export Performance by means of strategic marketing decisions. - 21 - The EMAP-Model 3.2.2a Country Screening Companies usually do country screening in order to identify attractive market opportunities for their product or service. For this purpose, market analysts rely on a few indicators, for which information can easily be gathered from secondary data sources. Depending on the nature of the product, companies will use different criteria to screen countries (Kotabe, 1998). For example, a company that plans to export a high-tech business-to-business product will evaluate a market according to different specific business standards than an exporter of fast moving consumer goods. 3.2.2b Market Research In international marketing research, segmentation plays a major role too. Companies are putting more and more effort into designing different products and services to meet the needs of customers in different countries. In the light of standardization of the product and regarding the applicable marketing mix and communication strategies, marketing research is of critical importance. In order to make marketing research for these purposes possible, international markets are segmented into clusters with homogeneous characteristics that are relevant for the company. Market segmentation is thus important to gain a better understanding of the foreign market (Kotabe, 1998). 3.2.2c Market Entry As a third point of reference, international market segmentation is important for market entry decisions. When a firm has to decide to expand operations into more markets than the ones it already serves, it is easier to manage business by means of segmented variables. When a market, similar to the market that is already served, is available for a product, a company might have a chance of increasing the total sales by applying the same strategy in the new market as well. A potential risk in this case is however that structural variables might differ in such a way that the similarities according to which the segment is defined might not hold and that entry in the new market can be harmful for the company. This makes consideration about the variables to use in segmentation very important (Kotabe, 1998). Market entry strategies will be due to further analysis in the next section of this chapter. - 22 - The EMAP-Model 3.2.2d Positioning International market segmentation can also significantly influence the positioning strategy that a company pursues. This holds as the positioning of a product or service in the minds of prospective target customers is strongly effected by environmental changes and shifts in consumer preferences (Kotabe, 1998). 3.2.2e Marketing Mix Finally, international marketing mix issues are strongly influenced by segmentation and positioning issues. In the light of international marketing mix variables, the decision of whether to standardize or to customize products and services to a particular market is of major importance. In order to strike a balance between standardization and customization of marketing programs, a clear insight on the foundations of a particular international market segment is important (Kotabe, 1998). As marketing mix issues are of major tactical concern for exporters, the concept of marketing mix adaptation will be further analyzed later on in this text. 3.3 International Market Entry Strategies Companies become committed to international markets only when they no longer believe that they can attain their strategic objectives by remaining at home. It is important to have a clear entry strategy for the new market. An entry strategy for international markets is a comprehensive plan. It sets forth the objectives, goals, resources, and policies that will guide a company’s international business operations over a future period long enough to achieve sustainable growth in world markets. Entry strategies have to be planned for each product in each individual market. Once all the individual product/ market strategies are completed, they should be combined into one corporate international market entry strategy (Root, 1987). 3.3.1 Factors influencing the choice of entry mode Once the foreign market is chosen, external factors like market size and growth are mostly a key determinant in the choice of how to enter a market. Large markets justify major market commitments in the form of joint ventures or wholly owned subsidiaries as these market entry strategies involve a high level of interaction between the company and the foreign market. The risk factor in a particular market is a second major concern in the respect of market entry strategy. - 23 - The EMAP-Model Risk mostly relates to the political and economic conditions that a firm encounters in a foreign market. Generally it holds that the greater the resource commitments, the higher the risk, and thus Market Commitment to the country concerned (Kotabe, 1998). It can be concluded that the internationalizing firm has to balance its decision between offering mainly human and financial resources to the entry strategy in the foreign market on the one hand and to control considerations over the foreign activities on the other hand. In this regard, a useful concept to resolve this dilemma is the Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) perspective. This analysis is based on the idea that the desirable governance structure of high versus low control mode will depend on the comparable transaction cost. 3.3.2 Transaction Cost Theory Transaction cost in the situation of market entry is the cost of running the operation (Kotabe, 1998). The underlying assumption of the TCA perspective is that the foreign market is competitive. For this reason, market pressure minimizes the need of control, as it is believed that the partners in the business process perfectly comply with the business objectives in the process. Arguably this condition should hold due to the mutual benefits of competing in a competitive market. As soon as the market mechanism fails, high-control entry modes become more desirable. From the TCA perspective, market failure typically happens when transaction specific assets become valuable. These assets are only valuable for a very narrow range of applications, including know-how, proprietary technology or brand equity. When these types of assets become very important the firm is better off choosing a high control marketentry strategy. The reason for this is that the internationalizing firm as the owner of these assets has to protect itself against opportunistic behavior and uncertainty (Kotabe, 1998). To illustrate: Multi National Companies (MNC´s) are most likely to enter a foreign market with wholly owned subsidiaries when the entry involves an R&D intensive line of business. Furthermore does research support the view that an advertising intensive line of business with high brand equity does also prefer a market entry strategy with wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. A last condition that supports the TCA approach is that MNC´s prefer a wholly owned subsidiary abroad when they have accumulated substantial experience in entering foreign markets (Kotabe, 1998). - 24 - The EMAP-Model Partnerships are most likely to be the preferred market entry strategies if the entry is in a high risk country. Also the entry in a socio-culturally distant country or into a country that imposes legal restrictions on foreign ownership of assets, is mostly done in the form of a partnership (Kotabe, 1998). Regardless of the conditions that an exporter faces, market commitment and management control are main drivers in market entry decisions. The next paragraphs will elaborate on these themes. 3.3.3 Market Commitment The concept of market commitment deserves further attention as it is an important factor in the determination of the most appropriate entry strategy to penetrate the foreign market (Root, 1987). Research points out that commitment has a positive effect on performance of companies that engage in international business. As such, relationship commitment represents an essential part of successful long term business relationships and it facilitates the smooth organization and coordination of economic activities between trading partners (Skarmeas et al., 2002). Market commitment can be defined as the extent to which a firm is dedicated to a close and enduring relationship with a market. In management literature, commitment has often been conceptualized as a cognitive-affective state, composed of continuance, affective and normative dimensions (Skarmeas et al., 2002). Continuance commitment is defined as the desire to continue the relationship with the overseas supplier (Skarmeas et al., 2002). The continuance dimension refers to an awareness of the costs associated with leaving the market. Firms with a strong continuance commitment towards a particular market continue their commitment because they need to be or stay in that market. Behavioral commitment on the other hand, reflects the extent to which the exporter provides special help to its overseas business partner. In this respect it can be said that behavioral commitment is instrumental in nature. Third, affective commitment refers to the sense of unity binding the exporter to its overseas business partner. The affective dimension of market commitment refers to the emotional attachment to a market. Firms with a strong affective commitment towards a particular market continue their commitment because they really want to be in that market (Skarmeas et al., 2002). - 25 - The EMAP-Model In the light of marketing strategy and governmental EMA, the extend to which an exporter gives special attention to its foreign partners plays a crucial role. For exporters, the behavioral component of commitment gives a very accurate reflection of commitment as it is rather instrumental. Governmental EMA programs have the potential to add significantly in this respect as exporters are facilitated with financial, information and management resources that allow for a better interaction with overseas business partners. This conceptualization gives rise to further exploration of the concept. 3.3.4 Management Control Management control over foreign operations is a second variable influencing the choice of a Market Entry Strategy. The first criterion that can be identified for the choice of market entry mode, is the corporate objectives of the firm. Depending on the aspirations of the firm it might choose a mode of entry that allows for a lot of control over the foreign operations or one with less control in that respect (Kotabe, 1998). Management control can be defined as the process by which management assures that the organization carries out its strategies (Thomas, 1985). Stemming from this observation, the need for management control can be mentioned as a determinant for market entry strategy selection. As control over marketing mix elements is desirable, firms have to make a trade off between control over foreign operations and resource participation in the foreign market. Higher resource commitment leads to more control over foreign operations of a firm (Kotabe, 1998). - 26 - The EMAP-Model 3.3.5 Market Entry Strategy and EMA Governmental EMA can arguably influence considerations about market entry strategies in foreign countries in the light of market commitment and management control over foreign operations. Since EMA through information provision, financial support and management support enhances the information and knowledge resources of the exporter, strategic marketing decisions are supposed to improve. Governmental EMA inputs are also expected to lead to a higher export performance, as a better business decision can be made on market entry strategy. Figure 2 gives a graphical representation of the relationship between Market Entry Strategies and the concepts of Market Commitment and Management Control. Control Branch Export/ Subsidiary • • Sole Venture • Joint Venture • • Licensing Agent/ Distributor Export • Indirect Export Commitment Figure 2. Evolution of a Manufacturer’s Decision on Entry Mode Source: Root, 1987 - 27 - The EMAP-Model As it can be seen in the figure above, every single market entry mode that a firm chooses implies different levels of market commitment and management control. The remainder of this sections will give some more insight into the concepts concerning the modes of market entry, as shown in figure 2. From a management perspective, three main entry modes can be identified, that lead to a higher market commitment and more management control. These are respectively exporting, contractual and investment entry modes (Root, 1987). 3.3.5a Exporting In exporting, a distinction can be made between indirect and direct exporting. In indirect exporting, the foreign sales contact, contract negotiations and product delivery are left to an intermediary that is located in the domestic market. The manufacturer actually consummates a domestic sale that, in turn, results in an export sale by someone else. Possible intermediaries that can be used in indirect exporting include commission-buying agents, country controlled buying agents, export management companies, export merchants, export agents and export trading companies. The advantage of indirect exporting is that the process is much less expensive, compared to establishing direct distribution channels. This advantage stems from the condition that the costs of penetrating the foreign market are due to the intermediary. Furthermore is an advantage of indirect exporting that it provides a firm with a good opportunity to test the foreign market. A major disadvantage however is that there is a big loss of opportunity gain; the intermediary has total control over pricing in the foreign market which leads to big potential profit for this party. Furthermore does indirect exporting imply a loss of control over the image of the producer as the intermediary reflects the image of the "exporter" in the foreign market (Walvoord, 1984; Kotabe, 1998). Direct exporting on the other hand, implies that the manufacturer maintains the responsibility for the foreign sales contact, contract negotiations and overseas shipment of the product. In this case the manufacturer also assumes the responsibility and the risk for getting paid. Usually, direct exporting includes the use of a foreign partner. Possible partners through whom direct exports can be distributed to the foreign market include foreign sales representatives, foreign sales agents and distributors (Walvoord, 1984; Kotabe, 1998). The biggest advantage of direct exporting is that it brings a higher potential profit. - 28 - The EMAP-Model As the producer is in charge of pricing other marketing related considerations, the potential for profit maximization becomes bigger compared to indirect exporting. Furthermore is the partners´ knowledge of the foreign market a big advantage over indirect exporting. As the partner has this knowledge, he is able to inform the producer about local customs, methods and special product needs. These extra insights create a great potential for closer customer relations and thus for higher potential sales. The disadvantage of direct exporting on the other hand is that it requires higher initial start up costs (Kotabe, 1998). Furthermore does the difference in politics, economics, market potential, culture, infrastructure and legislation between countries lead to potential disadvantages in case of direct exporting (Wood and Robbertson, 2000). 3.3.5b Contractual entry modes Contractual entry modes are long term non-equity associations between an international company and an entity in a foreign target country that involve the transfer of technology or human skills from the former to the latter. Contractual entry modes are distinguished from export entry modes because they are primarily vehicles for the transfer of knowledge and skills, although they may also create export opportunities. Investment entry modes on the other hand are also different from contractual entry modes as they do not involve equity investment by the international company (Root, 1987). According to Root (1987), contractual entry modes can consist of licensing agreements, Franchising, Technical agreements, Service contracts, Management contracts, construction/ turnkey contracts, contract manufacturing, coproduction agreements and the like. Evidently, contractual agreements imply a higher Market Commitment and more Management Control. - 29 - The EMAP-Model 3.3.5c Investment Entry Modes These entry modes involve the ownership by an international company of manufacturing plants of other production units in the target country. In terms of the production stage, the subsidiaries may range all the way from simple assembly plants that depend entirely on imports of intermediate products from the parent company to plants that undertake the full manufacture of a product. In case an investment entry mode is chosen to establish an assembly plant, as in the first case, this can be regarded as an extension of the export entry mode. Foreign production affiliates can be classified as sole ventures with full ownership and control by the parent company. A sole venture can be started from scratch, being a new establishment, or by acquiring a local company, being a acquisition (Root, 1987). Evidently, the investment entry modes rank highest in terms of Market Commitment and Management Control. 3.3.6 Summary Regarding the information needs of exporters, EMA can significantly help in solving strategic marketing problems. formation provision, financial support and management support will stimulate exporters in their strategic decision making. For Market Segmentation, Country Screening and Market Research are expected to be positively influenced by EMA. In turn it is also believed that Country Screening and Market Research lead to a higher Export performance as financial, strategic and satisfaction performance measures will rice. Thus, these concepts are expected to give an appropriate reflection of Segmentation decisions for this study. As can be derived from international marketing literature and from the discussion above, the right Market Entry strategy does also significantly add to the firm's success in foreign markets. This section provided a deeper insight into related concepts of Market Entry strategies in foreign markets. For the purpose of developing a structure for research, the concepts of Market Commitment and Management Control were presented. These concepts can be used as intermediate variables for the measurement of the influence of EMA on export performance. For the EMAP-Model, behavioral commitment will be used in order to derive viable conclusions for market entry strategies and governmental EMA. - 30 - The EMAP-Model 3.4 Tactical Export Marketing Variables Besides strategic export marketing variables, tactical export marketing categories that relate to governmental EMA have to be considered. According to the EMAP-Model, governmental EMA can have an influence on these variables by means of information provision, financial support and management support. Whereas marketing decisions on the strategic level are concerned with the planning of the marketing process, tactical marketing decisions address the actual execution of the marketing plan. To illustrate: once markets are segmented and a market entry strategy is chosen according to criteria described in the previous chapter, tactical considerations have to be made about how the particular product should be marketed within that setting. For these decisions in exporting companies, typically marketing mix issues should be considered (Boyd, 2002; Crick and Czinkota, 1995). Marketing mix variables can provide a good point of reference for the governmental EMA effectiveness regarding the degree of adaptation in the foreign market. As knowledge of a market is crucial in the decision whether to adapt or standardize a marketing program, EMA can be regarded as an important input in the decision making process. 3.4.1 The Marketing Mix Defining tactical marketing variables for the EMAP-Model requires a deeper understanding of the marketing mix. The marketing mix can be defined as the set of controllable marketing variables that the manager uses to carry out a marketing strategy in pursuit of the firm’s objectives in a given target market (Boyd, 2002). Marketing literature broadly supports the view that these variables are defined by the four P’s, which stand for Product, Price, Promotion and Place. This section will briefly explain this concept by a literature review from an Export Marketing perspective. In the marketing plan, the product comprises the tangible and intangible attributes that that confer benefits on users (Root, 1987) Product decisions that are important in the respect of marketing concern issues like quality, product features, style, options, brand name, packaging, warranties and services (Boyd, 2002). Theory and practice point out that pricing decisions are amongst the most difficult decisions in the marketing process since price levels can be influenced by a large number of factors. As companies have several motives to charge different prices to different customers, a price structure is important. - 31 - The EMAP-Model A price structure establishes guidelines for adapting the price to variations in cost and demand across different markets (Boyd, 2002). Prices are not established uniformly throughout different business settings, marketers have to make some price adjustment decisions to accommodate differences across geographic territories, national boundaries, types of customers and items within the product line (Boyd, 2002). Distribution and transport decisions are very important in tactical marketing considerations as well. The general goals of a proper transport and distribution system comprise product availability, promotional support from channel members, market information throughout the distribution channels, cost effectiveness and flexibility (Boyd, 2002). The last factor that is identified in the marketing mix, is Promotion. Depending on strategic considerations such as which market entry strategy to pursue and how to segment the international target market for export activities of a firm, promotion mix decisions have to be made in the effort to market products and services internationally. A promotion plan can be defined as a process of building and reinforcing mutually profitable relationships with employees, customers, other stakeholders, and the general public by developing and coordinating a strategic communications program that enables them to make constructive contact with the company brand through a variety of media (Boyd, 2002). Developing a promotion mix requires a sequence of steps that have to be followed, ranging from the determination of the target market to budgeting for promotional activities better knowledge and understanding on these factors in the foreign market. 3.4.2 Marketing Mix Adaptation For Export Marketing, the variables that are discussed in the previous paragraph require further discussion in the light of adaptation of marketing activities. The degree of standardization vs. adaptation of marketing programs in the foreign market is of major importance for an exporting company. The better a firm knows the foreign market requirements, the better it will be able to be successful in that market. In case a company decides to apply a standardized marketing mix policy, it uses the same marketing mix approach in all the international markets that it serves. Standardization of marketing mix policy brings several advantages to internationally operating firms. - 32 - The EMAP-Model The most important advantage in the execution of the marketing program is, however, that economics of scale can be realized, resulting in lower costs (Boyd, 2002). Adaptation of the marketing mix to the local market, however, accounts for cultural differences in preferences, values, attitudes and beliefs of the target market (Boyd, 2002). 3.4.2a Product Adaptation Regarding the product offering in the marketing mix of exporters, literature points out that a high degree of product adaptation is found under specific circumstances. When the firm is internationally competent, the product is unique, new, or culture specific, the industry is less technology intensive or the export market is competitive, product adaptation is applicable. A product that is unique to the domestic market, new to the company, or culture specific could have limited acceptance in the export market. In other words, product adaptation to a particular export market is most likely to be successful if the firm is able to respond to the local conditions by an adaptation strategy (Cavusgil, 1994). 3.4.2b Pricing Adaptation In the light of adaptation of export pricing policy, the technology orientation of industry has a big influence. Research points out that managers are not resorting necessarily to price as a competitive weapon as a result of either market pressures or higher commitment to the venture, which could reflect a preference for non-price competition. However, it is also shown that a competitive pricing strategy is used more frequently in technology intensive industries. This observation implies that firms try to recover their investments in technology by broadening the customer base in export markets via competitive pricing (Cavusgil, 1994). 3.4.2c Promotion Adaptation The competitive pressures in the export market determine adaptation of promotion, As well as media availability in the export market. It is shown that promotion adaptation tends to be high for established products. Presumably, greater experience with the product gives management a better understanding of what can facilitate or hinder a product's potential in the export markets (Cavusgil, 1994). - 33 - The EMAP-Model 3.4.2d Distribution and Transport Adaptation Adaptation in relation to distribution and transport decisions of exporters boils down to initiating and sustaining strong and mutually beneficial relationships with foreign partners, as it is of major importance. These channel relations comprehend support to foreign distributors and subsidiaries in the form of sales force training, technical assistance, marketing know-how and promotional support. The most critical determinant of such support is management's commitment to the export venture (Cavusgil, 1994). 3.4.3 Summary In tactical decisions regarding Marketing Mix Adaptation, EMA can play a significant role. EMA programs can influence decisions related to the foreign product offering of a firm. Here it can be argued that EMA programs could provide extra information to produce the product in the foreign market. This information can improve the servicing of technical advise to international customers, help in streamlining the supply process of eventual parts that are required in the maintenance of the product and in repair services (Crick and Czinkota, 1995). Also Pricing decisions as well as distribution decisions can be enhanced as exporters can gain insights through contacts and financial aid by making use of EMA programs. The same holds for the adaptation of promotional activities as a good knowledge of the foreign market conditions is required to be successful. In order to define what successful means in this respect, the following section of this research paper will address the concept of Export Performance Measurement by a literature review. It will introduce the EXPERF Scale, developed by Zou (1998). 3.5 Export Performance Measurement This section will discuss the concept of export performance measurement in order to establish a theoretical clipboard upon which conclusions about export performance in the EMAP-Model can be measured and generalized. The study by Zou et al., (1998) will be used for the purpose of export performance measurement. It provides a synthesis of several attempts to define a measure for export performance. The measure that these authors provide is called the Export Performance Scale, or EXPERF-Scale. - 34 - The EMAP-Model In the research that has been conducted in the field of export marketing so far, many researchers have tried to measure export performance. A big inconsistency for verification of these data is however, that most studies explored the concept of export performance according to different independent measures such as export sales, export growth, export profitability, export market share, attainment of market goals, export intensity and perceived success among other exporters. Although these are good indicators for a firms' success in exporting operations, a clear-cut definition for a valid and general approach to the measurement of export performance cannot be distinguished. This has led to multiple results that could not be generalized, due to different interpretations that are given to the concept. A further drawback of previous work is that most studies have conducted research in a one-country context. Due to this fact, export marketing research has lead to incomparable conclusions as it has been conducted in multiple countries, which place different emphases on exporting (Zou et. al., 1998). A unified concept of export performance measurement is important for policy makers, both on a micro as well as on a macro level. On the macro level, governments around the world are concerned with ways to improve their firms' performances in export markets, as exports are considered an engine of economic growth. On a micro level, it is more and more recognized by firms, that success in the domestic market does not guarantee success in foreign markets (Zou et. al., 1998). 3.5.1 Definition Export Performance can conceptually be defined as the composite outcome of firms' international sales (Shoham, 1998). This definition is based on five shared themes that determine export performance. First, the central importance of export performance has to be recognized in the respect of strategy and thus international strategy. This statement holds due to the fact that performance is a pivotal outcome construct in the study of international strategy. Second, the definition of export performance should depend on firm and marketing performance. This observation is due as firms should be consistent in performance measurement in both national and international operations. Third, export performance should be defined in such a way that allows for proper interpretation for both internal and external stakeholders of a firm. Fourth, the definition of export performance is context specific. - 35 - The EMAP-Model This condition should be regarded as the performance definition depends on the research context of a given study. The last factor that is argued to be important in defining export performance is that the concept might be problem driven, rather that theory driven. Although this condition supports the definition that is stated above, it is not comprehensive for a structured and scientific approach to the concept (Shoham, 1998). 3.5.2 The EXPERF-Scale The EXPERF-Scale comprises three dimensions along which export performance can be measured simultaneously. The dimensions are financial export performance, strategic export performance and satisfaction with the export venture (Zou et. al., 1998). This paragraph will provide a theoretical review of this concept. Measurement of export performance according to financial factors is most common as it is argued that exporting is part of a firms' marketing program. This condition makes export performance measurement subject to the measurement of marketing performance, which usually happens in financial terms. Indicators of financial export performance measurement are export sales, export sales growth, export profits and export intensity (Zou et. al., 1998). The second measurement dimension of export performance is the strategic outcome of exporting. The main consideration in this measurement-dimension is that firms often have strategic goals in exporting. The indicators that can be identifies in this respect are market share, strategic presence in the foreign market and competitive position (Zou et. al., 1998). Third, satisfaction with the export venture can be used as a unified benchmark for the measurement of export performance. Under this exploration variable, perceptual and attitudinal measures of performance are addressed. The foundation for this concept lies in evidence that a positive attitude toward exporting, satisfaction with the export venture operations is a strong indication for successful exporting (Zou et. al., 1998). Direct indicators for this dimension of Export Performance are perceived export success and satisfaction with the export venture. Indirect indicators for this behavioral variable are propensity to export, attitude to exporting and attitude towards overcoming barriers to exporting. To illustrate: Higher management involvement is associated with more export success, as it is believed to lead to higher export sales. - 36 - The EMAP-Model With this approach, this paper follows the Model of the Role of Export Promotion, developed by Singer and Czinkota (1994). According to their model, increasing, accelerating, or even substituting for management export knowledge and experience, export assistance is thought to stimulate positive perceptions of, and attitudes toward exporting (Singer and Czinkota, 1994). Here, the authors show that management commitment is of crucial importance to the effectiveness of export assistance, leading to higher export sales (Singer and Czinkota, 1994). 3.5.3 Summary Concluding from the discussion above, this study will apply the EXPERF-Scale. The three dimensions of export performance, identified by Zou et al. (1998) will be used in the EMAP-Model. The application of the EXPERF-Model can lead to an advancement of the knowledge of exporting in at least three ways. First, because the EXPERF-Scale integrates previous approaches to measuring export performance, it can facilitate the comparison of both past research and future work. Second, the relative importance of the different determinants of export performance can be explored more specifically with the EXPERF-Scale, due to the clearly defined and measurable factors that it comprehends. Third, the EXPERF-Scale facilitates comparison of research studies, conducted in different countries (Zou, 1998). Table 3 lists the dimensions of the EXPERF-Scale with the indicators that belong to each category. - 37 - The EMAP-Model Financial factors Strategic Outcome of Exporting Satisfaction with the Export Venture Export sales Market share Perceived Export success Export sales growth Strategic presence in the foreign Satisfaction with the Export market Process Competitive position Propensity to export Export profits Export intensity Attitude to exporting Attitude towards overcoming barriers to exporting Table 3. Export Performance Measurement; Dimensions and Indicators - 38 - The EMAP-Model 4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESES 4.1 Introduction From the theory review in the preceding chapters, we can derive that a relationship between Governmental EMA and Export Performance can be expected. It can also be concluded that a clear relationship between governmental EMA and Export Marketing decisions does exist, both on strategic and tactical firm level. In turn, both strategic and tactical marketing decisions can enhance export performance of companies. For support of the EMAP-Model, hypotheses for further research will be formulated. This section will evaluate the relationships and outcomes of EMA. For this purpose, the expected effects of the key concepts will be discussed. 4.2 EMA and Export Marketing Proposition 1: “More Governmental information provision improves strategic and tactical marketing decisions of exporters.” Management control and market commitment are important factors for strategic export marketing because they directly affect market entry decisions. EMA stimulates market commitment by means of giving exporters better insights into market conditions as more information about a market will lead to a higher level of identification of the exporter with the export market and thus to a higher market commitment. In the light of market entry considerations, EMA through information provision also gives marketing managers more market knowledge. In other words, it can be expected that the use of more Governmental Export Information leads to more management control of exporters as well. Regarding market segmentation, it can be expected that exporters can make better strategic export marketing decisions through a more intensive use of governmental export information. Gains in this respect are to be expected for both country screening and market research, as these activities become more effective when more information is available. From these observations, the following hypotheses can be formulated: - 39 - The EMAP-Model H1a Using more Governmental Export Information leads to more Management Control H1b Using more Governmental Export Information leads to more Market Commitment H1c Using more Governmental Export Information leads to better Country Screening H1d Using more Governmental Export Information leads to Better Market Research On the tactical export marketing level, EMA through Governmental Export Information provision can be expected to have a positive influence on adaptation of the marketing mix. When Exporters have more information about internal and external market variables, it is to be expected that it is easier to adapt the marketing mix variables to the export market conditions. H1e Using more Governmental Export Information leads to more Product Adaptation H1f Using more Governmental Export Information leads to more Price Adaptation H1g Using more Governmental Export Information leads to more Promotion Adaptation H1h Using more Governmental Export Information leads to more Place Adaptation For the second EMA variable, financial support, a positive effect on Export Marketing success can be expected. Generally speaking we can arrive at the following proposition. - 40 - The EMAP-Model Proposition 2: “More Governmental EMA through Financial Support improves Strategic and Tactical marketing decisions of exporters” Export managers can enhance their export strategies with more financial resources. From an EMA perspective, it seems plausible that financial support for market visits gives export managers a better insight in foreign business practice. Furthermore can governmental guarantees also be expected to lead to better strategic export marketing. Financial governmental guarantees are a form of risk protection for the exporter and less risk leads to more market commitment and more management control. Country screening and market research can also be positively influenced by financial governmental support. It allows export managers to put more financial resources and time in these activities. We hypothesize: H2a More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to more Management Control H2b More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to more Market Commitment H2c More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to better Country Screening H2d More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to better Market Research - 41 - The EMAP-Model The expected effect that financial governmental EMA has on tactical export marketing decisions is also positive. Financial support for market visits give the exporter an incentive for more personal involvement in the execution of the export marketing plan, leading to more marketing mix adaptation. Furthermore do governmental guarantees reduce the risk of investing in activities for marketing mix adaptation in the foreign market. H2e More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to more Product Adaptation H2f More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to more Price Adaptation H2g More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to more Promotion Adaptation H2h More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to more Place Adaptation Proposition 3: “More Governmental Management Support improves strategic and tactical marketing decisions of exporters” Stemming from the literature review, assisting exporters in the establishment of a foreign sales office is an example of governmental management support. A foreign sales office provides exporters with a physical representation in the export market. In this way, it gives them a possibility to gain a better insight in the complexity of the export markets. In other words, a foreign sales office makes exporters more responsive to the external export environment, which positively affects both strategic and tactical marketing activities. It can be assumed that exporters gain a better competitive position in this way. - 42 - The EMAP-Model Export managers gain more management control and market commitment through this support. Marketing control will improve through the direct communication and power relationship between the company and its sales office. Resource commitment is evidently also higher in case of a sales office in a foreign market, compared to, for example, using a commission agent. Country screening and market research are also expected to become more effective, as foreign sales offices bring exporters a physical workspace in the foreign market for the execution of their market segmentation strategies through market research and country screening. In the light of these arguments, we arrive at the following hypotheses: H3a More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to more Management Control H3b More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to more Market Commitment H3c More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to better Country Screening H3d More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to better Market Research Presence in a foreign market can play an important role in the adaptation process of the marketing mix of an exporter as well. The exporter has a more direct connection to the foreign market through the sales office and is thus more aware of overseas market conditions. This awareness will enhance marketing mix adaptation in the marketing process of the exporter. In this way, governmental support in the establishment of the foreign sales office is directly enhancing the adaptation of the marketing mix to the export market. We hypothesize: - 43 - The EMAP-Model H3e More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to more Product Adaptation H3f More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to more Price Adaptation H3g More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to more Promotion Adaptation H3h More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to more Place Adaptation 4.3 Export Marketing and Export Performance The outcome of the EMAP-Model comprehends Export Performance, measured by the EXPERF-Scale. The scale consists of three factors that are Financial factors, Strategic Outcome of exporting and Satisfaction with the export venture. Strategic marketing variables can be expected to influence these variables. First of all, Management Control, as a second strategic marketing factor, can also lead to a higher export performance. Each type of market entry strategy brings different means of control over foreign operations to the exporter. According to the EXPERF-Scale, performance can be measured through export sales and export sales growth. From a transaction cost perspective, it can be argued that more control leads to more sales, sales growth and thus to a higher export performance. This assumption can be made as more control through a particular market entry strategy is supposed to reduce opportunistic behavior of foreign channel members. In order to prove this we hypothesize: H4 More Management Control leads to a higher Export Performance - 44 - The EMAP-Model Market commitment can have an influence export performance. The more committed a firm is to the market, the more likely it will be that the firm’s foreign partner will cooperate in the achievement of the firms strategic goals. Thus, through high commitment, export performance is expected to improve. It can mainly be expected that satisfaction with the Export venture, as a measure on the EXPERFScale, can be improved. From this, we draw the following hypothesis: H5 More Market Commitment leads to a higher Export Performance In case a firm is able to segment its international markets effectively, it can perform better. As the literature study pointed out, market segmentation is enhanced by means of country screening and market research. From this observation, we draw the following hypotheses: H6 Better Country Screening leads to a higher Export Performance H7 Better Market Research leads to a higher Export Performance Adaptation of the marketing mix can also be expected to lead to higher export performance. Adaptation in the marketing mix leads to a higher product acceptation since the export product accounts for cultural differences in preferences, values, attitudes and beliefs of the target market. Adaptation of the marketing mix is important for exporters because they are mainly small and medium sized companies. From this condition, selling products and services in the export market requires a good understanding of cultural differences. Arguably, this understanding is more important then scale advantages in export marketing. From these advantages of marketing mix adaptation, we draw the following hypotheses: H8 More Product Adaptation leads to a higher Export Performance H9 More Price Adaptation leads to a higher Export Performance H10 More Promotion Adaptation leads to a higher Export Performance H11 More Place Adaptation leads to a higher Export Performance - 45 - The EMAP-Model 4.4 EMA and Export performance Regardless of marketing variables in the export process, a direct effect of EMA on export performance can be expected as well. Due to the nature of the governmental services that are provided, support should have a positive effect on performance in any particular way. H12 More Governmental EMA through Management Support leads to a higher Export Performance H13 More Governmental EMA through Financial Support leads to a higher Export Performance H14 Using more Governmental Export Information leads to a higher Export Performance Summarizing, Figure 3 represents the operational model that can be derived from the discussion above. - 46 - The EMAP-Model Government level Firm Level Outcome Level H1a(+) H2a(+) H3a(+) H1b(+) H2b(+) Management Control Market Commitment H4(+) H5(+) H3b(+) H1c(+) H2c(+) H3c(+) Information Provision H1d(+) H2d(+) H3d(+) Country Screening Market Research H6(+) H7(+) Export Performance H1e(+) Financial Support H2e(+) H3e(+) Product Adaptation H8(+) H1f(+) H2f(+) H3f(+) H1g(+) H2g(+) Management Support H3g(+) H1h(+) H2h(+) H3h(+) Price Adaptation H9(+) Promotion Adaptation H10(+) Place Adaptation H11(+) H12(+) H13(+) H14(+) Figure 3. The EMAP-Model; Conceptual Model - 47 - The EMAP-Model 4.5 Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in EMA By means of the EMAP-Model above, Research Question 1 is answered and a theoretical clipboard for this study is developed. This section will end this chapter with formulating a set of hypotheses to derive an answer to the Research Problem as stated in Chapter one. The research must be conducted in such a way that it allows for a clear distinction between two groups of high and low performing exporters. This is possible with the EXPERF Scale. After we have gained this insight, the analysis of the responses should proceed in such a way that it becomes clear which elements of EMA were used by each sub-group (hence: high and low performing exporters). Factor analysis can be used to refine the data. By doing so, qualifiers, success factors and obsoletes in governmental EMA can be distinguished. As already stated before, a qualifier for governmental export promotion is an aspect of governmental export promotion that is used by both high and low performing exporters. A success factor is an aspect of governmental export promotion that is specifically used by high performing exporters, whereas the low performers do not use it. Obsoletes in governmental export promotion are the aspects that are actually offered by governments, but which are only used by low performing exporters. A schematic overview of this is given in Table 4 below. High Performing Low Performing Exporters Exporters Qualifiers + + Success-factors + - Obsoletes - + + = Governmental EMA Service Element used by Exporters - = Governmental EMA Service Element not used by Exporters Table 4. Qualification Model of Governmental Export Information (Repeated) - 48 - The EMAP-Model In accordance with this classification model, the following hypotheses will be due to analysis. For convenience, this set of hypotheses is listed with roman numbers to make a distinction with the hypotheses that were formulated for the theoretical framework above. EMA and Export Marketing H I. EMA services are equally important for exporters with high Management Control and exporters with low Management Control H II. EMA services are equally important for exporters with high Market Commitment and exporters with low Market Commitment. H III. EMA services are equally important for exporters with a high degree of Product Adaptation and exporters with a low degree of Product Adaptation H IV. EMA services are equally important for exporters with a high degree of Price Adaptation and exporters with a low degree of Price Adaptation H V. EMA services are equally important for exporters with a high degree of Promotion Adaptation and exporters with a low degree of Promotion Adaptation H VI. EMA services are equally important for exporters with a high degree of Place Adaptation and exporters with a low degree of Place Adaptation - 49 - The EMAP-Model Export Marketing and Export Performance H VII. Management Control is equally important for high performing exporters and Low performing exporters H VIII. Market Commitment is equally important for high performing exporters and Low performing exporters H IX. Product Adaptation is equally important for high performing exporters and low performing exporters H X. Price Adaptation is equally important for high performing exporters and low performing exporters H XI. Promotion Adaptation is equally important for high performing exporters and low performing exporters H XII. Place Adaptation is equally important for high performing exporters and low performing exporters EMA and Export Performance H XIII. Governmental EMA is equally important for Exporters with a high Export Performance and Exporters with a low Export Performance - 50 - The EMAP-Model 5 METHODOLOGY 5.1 Introduction So far, this research paper was of explorative nature in order to build a theoretical foundation for this study. Emerging from the discussion, it can be concluded that the research field Governmental Export Promotion is lacking a structured and quantitative approach to the matter. As the literature study revealed a conceptual model (EMAP-Model) with a rich theoretical foundation, we will now proceed with a quantitative research to test its applicability. This section will act as a basis for a more conclusive research to test the conceptual model with a quantitative study. First a deeper insight into the setting of the research and its respondents will be presented. Then, the practical preparations that had to be made in order to conduct the research will be addressed. Third, the EMAP-Model will be explained by means of its constructs and measures. 5.2 Research design Testing the EMAP-Model has to be done in three steps. The first emphasis of testing the model should be on the effects that EMA has on Export Marketing. The analysis as described above, can be verified by means of strategic and tactical export marketing variables in the EMAP-Model. Obviously there should be a positive relationship between the EMA services (governmental level) and the marketing variables (firm level). Second, the effects of Export Marketing on Export Performance should be investigated. This is done to verify the importance of each marketing variable in the export process. The relationships between the variables in the light of market entry strategies can become clearer by means of the effects of market commitment and management control on export performance. Besides this, testing the effects of Marketing Mix adaptation can act as a confirmatory basis to test the EMAPModel. Third, the direct relationships between EMA and Export Performance has to be investigated. Testing the EMAP-Model in this way can be done with a study of cross sectional design, which means that the investigation involves ”a sample of elements selected from the population of interest which are measured at a single point in time (Churchill, 1996).” - 51 - The EMAP-Model 5.3 Data collection method The data were collected through a self-administered online questionnaire carried out via a website of Maastricht University. The two reasons for using an online questionnaire were costs and reach. Due to a very limited budget it is impossible to use any other survey method other than an online one. Further, a much larger population can be reached and the data processing is facilitated as it is already in an electronic format. According to Churchill (1996), data collection via a structured questionnaire where the questions are asked in a prearranged order ensures the highest possible comparability between the individual research results (Churchill, 1996). 5.4 Sample Selection The database that was used consisted of Brazilian exporting companies from all industries. A research amongst Brazilian exporters is applicable as the export activity of the country is rapidly increasing, with a growing and strong support by governmental and semi-governmental institutions. The promotion of Brazilian exporters has a strong focus in economic policy of the country. In January 2003, the Ministry of Development, Industry and Trade (MDIC) announced that the government aimed to increase exports by ten percent that year, create 400,000 new export related jobs, and strengthen official institutional support in terms of trade finance and export promotion. Export success would be key to realizing the government’s announced social and economic objectives, and also serve as a positive signal to international markets in terms of Brazil’s commitment to growth, attracting foreign direct investment and avoiding a default on its debt (Doctor, 2003). To illustrate the strong focus on export promotion in Brazil: “50% of all export companies in Brazil account for less than 0,5% of all exports (Brazil4export.com).” The industries that were chosen for this research were the Brazilian Clothing and Shoe industry and the Brazilian machinery industry, as these sectors prove to have a high export potential in the country (www.ahkbrasil.com; www.evd.nl). The contact data were provided by the Departamento de Operações de Comércio Exterior (Foreign Trade Operations Department) (DECEX), a branch of the Secretaria de Comércio Exterior (Secretary of Foreign Trade) (SECEX) of the Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade (MDIC) (www.brazil4export.com). - 52 - The EMAP-Model 5.5 Sampling Procedure In order to obtain reliable data, it was decided to send out electronic questionnaires to 468 Brazilian exporters. The database of which these addresses were extracted contained more than this amount of potential respondents, but due to a focus on the Brazilian export industries that engage most in export promotion programs of he Brazilian government, this sample was formed. Furthermore the extraction of the contact data from the database was very time consuming, leading to this sample size. The questionnaire was developed in English and later translated into Portuguese as Brazilian managers might have problems with an English version of the text. The text was translated after positive feedback from Maastricht University. The translation was done by an experienced Brazilian translator. After that, it was verified by a Brazilian manager from the German Brazilian Chamber of Commerce and Trade for its specific technical interpretation for exporters. When the translation was finished, the questionnaire was put online on the server of Maastricht University. Respondents received an email with an introduction letter, including a link to the online questionnaire. In order to attain a higher response rate, the logos of the German Brazilian Chamber of Commerce and Trade and Maastricht University were added at the bottom of the introduction letter in the email and on the end of the questionnaire. By this means the research was expected to communicate its credibility to the respondents as the two institutions are established in the research field and have a good name. After the questionnaire was sent once, a reminder was sent twice, after one and two weeks respectively. - 53 - The EMAP-Model 5.6 Constructs and measures The respondents were asked to give their opinion to 29 statements on 5-point Likert scales, varying from “strongly disagree” (1) to “Strongly agree” (5), concerning EMA, foreign Market Entry, Marketing Mix Adaptation and Export Performance (129). In order to gain a better understanding of the internal reliability of the research, a reliability analysis was conducted. Reliability analysis is used to evaluate a multi item scale for its reliability. It determines the extent to which the items in the questionnaire are related to each other and identifies problem items that should be excluded from the scale. It provides an overall index of the repeatability or internal consistency of the scale as a whole. The overall index, referred to as Cronbach Alfa, varies from 0 to 1, and a value of 0.6 or less generally indicates unsatisfactory internal consistency reliability (Malhotra and Briks, 1999) (appendix III). 5.6.1 EMA Variables The applicability of EMA was assessed on the basis of three main fields. The categories of EMA that were due to research were information provision (questions 15), financial support (questions 6-8) and management support (questions 9-10) and were derived from a study of Diamantopoulos (1993). Reliability analysis proved that the constructs of Information Provision and Financial Support were reliable, showing a Cronbach Alpha of .8799 and .6507 respectively. Also the construct of Management Support proved to be reliable with an alpha of .6282. The constructs could be improved by leaving question 3 out for Information Provision (resulting in an alpha of .8800) and question 8 for Financial Support (resulting in alpha .7047) (appendix III). 5.6.2 Strategic Export Marketing Variables Next, the degree of strategic considerations in the export marketing process of the Brazilian exporters had the main focus. In order to determine directions of strategies for market entry, the questionnaire contained three questions measuring the degree of management control and three questions for market commitment. Management control was measured on a three item, 5-point, Likert scale, originally developed by Bateson and Hui (1992) (questions 11-13). As a Likert scale was used, it was easy to word questions in the other direction. It prevented the respondents from simply checking the same alternative for each question when filling out the questionnaire. For this reason question 12 was worded negatively, in contrast to the other questions that ended positively. - 54 - The EMAP-Model Hence, the scores were recoded accordingly, the lowest value was transformed into the highest value and vise versa. Regarding the validity of the scale it has to be stressed that the original scale was used. This scale did not posses a high proved validity (Bateson and Hui, 1992). This condition is reflected in the low Cronbach alpha of only .3128 (appendix III). Subsequently, three questions measuring the (behavioral) market commitment of the exporters were included in the questionnaire. These data were acquired by asking the level of agreement to statements in accordance with Skarmeas (2002) (questions 14-16). Although the original measure contains a four item, 5 point Likert Scale, this research only applied a three item scale. This adaptation was made to limit the questions in the questionnaire so that a minimum of the respondent’s time was required in answering the questions, ensuring a higher response rate. Leaving the item out did not reveal any problems, as the alpha in the reliability analysis of the scale is as high as .8665 (appendix III). For convenience of the study, the effects of strategic marketing considerations of exporters are explored by means of Market Entry Strategy decisions. Hence, although the concept of International Market Segmentation is an important part of the EMAP-Model, it was not subject to this quantitative research. Including the construct would have resulted in a questionnaire that would be too long and time consuming to answer for the respondents. 5.6.3 Tactical Export Marketing Variables The degree of adaptation of the marketing mix in the foreign market was chosen as a construct to reflect tactical export marketing decisions. The four P’s in the marketing mix of a firm were explored with seven statements in the questionnaire. Questions 17 till 19 concerned product adaptation. Adaptation of sales promotion and advertising strategies was explored in questions 20 and 21. For adaptation of the distribution function, only one question was added (question 22). The last concept of the marketing mix adaptation theory, pricing, was tested with one question as well (question 23). These measures were derived from a research conducted by Zou (2002). Reliability analysis of these scales resulted in a good internal validity of both Product Adaptation and Promotion adaptation, showing an alpha of .9338 and .8568 respectively (appendix III). The reliability analysis for Price Adaptation and Place adaptation was not relevant since these concepts were assessed with only one question. - 55 - The EMAP-Model 5.6.4 Export Performance Variables The performance of exporters was measured by using the export performance scale (EXPERF Scale), developed by Zou (1998). The EXPERF Scale measures export performance on three dimensions which are financial performance, strategic performance and satisfaction with the export venture. Six statements were included in the questionnaire, measuring export performance according to this nine item, five point Likert-type scale. Financial export performance was explored in question 24 and 25. Question 26 and 27 were added to account for insights in strategic export performance and satisfaction with the export venture was covered by question 28 and 29. Evidently, not all the items were applied in the questionnaire, minimizing the number of questions to ensure a higher response rate from managers. Reliability analysis showed that the concepts were separately reliable with an Cronbach Alpha of .8506, .8080 and .8989 respectively. 5.6.5 Classification Variables To gain a deeper insight into the nature of the exporters, two questions (30 and 31) of the research were concerned with general data of the respondents. These classification variables explored the relative amount of exports in the turnover of the companies and the number of employees. By means of these questions it is possible to scale the size of the company and to get a clearer insight in the importance of exports in the business process of the companies, hence, the importance of EMA. The last answering possibility gave the respondents room to enter recommendations or critiques to the questionnaire and the questions. - 56 - comments, The EMAP-Model 6 DATA ANALYSIS 6.1 Introduction In the previous chapter, the methodology for the research of the EMAP-Model was explained. This chapter will proceed with the analysis of the data that were gathered. As the research revealed a response rate of only 5.1%, a full empirical analysis of the data to test and support the EMAP-Model has become troublesome. In this chapter we will however give a representation of our data analysis that will add to the classification model and thus the second (roman numbered) set of hypotheses. Analyzing the data will be done in order to find an answer to the Research Problem. An assessment of possible explanations for the low response rate can be found in appendix IV in the back of this paper. This chapter proceeds with an analysis of the outcomes and results of both empirical and qualitative data. 6.2 Summary: EMA and its Implications EMA and its influence on the Export Marketing and Export Performance was assessed by an elaboration on the provision and the use of Export Promotion in Brazil. So far, this paper derived a theoretical framework, as summarized in the EMAPModel. This was done by means of finding answers to research question 1. For convenience, the first research question, as stated in chapter one, is repeated below: Research question 1: “How do governmental export promotion programs relate to information needs of exporters?” The theoretical framework answers this research question with an extensive theoretical backup. This basis forms a good point of reference in finding conclusive answers and solutions to the research problem. In order to do this some further research questions will be formulated. First however, the research problem as stated in chapter one will be repeated. What are Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in Governmental Export Marketing Assistance? - 57 - The EMAP-Model 6.3 EMA in Brazil In order to find a concluding answer to the research question, this section will proceed with the analysis of the data. Before we do this however, the background of the study will be represented. By doing so, this section gives further insights in the setting of the research. After this is done, the data from our research will be analyzed and discussed in order to derive at concluding answers to the research problem above. 6.3.1 Information Provision in Brazil Brazilian Exporters can make use of several sources of export information. The specific variables of information provision that were used in the EMAP-Model are trade fairs, publications, market visits, identification of import duties and contact information provision. All these modes of information provision are available for Brazilian exporters. Both governmental and semi-governmental institutions provide exporters with informational services. Specially standardized export information is widely available in both written and online publications. Also the identification of import duties and the provision of contact information are commonly available as standardized export information. Regarding more customized information provision, governmental and semi-governmental organizations work together with industrial associations. This is done to improve the coordination for specific information of the customized export promotion effort. To illustrate: Chambers of commerce and trade organize trade fairs that are often initiated by the Brazilian government. Chambers of Commerce bear the responsibility for these projects but they work together with sector associations for a better coordination and customization. 6.3.2 Financial Support in Brazil In the light of the variables for financial export support, the EMAP-Model lists loans, guarantees and financial support for project participation. Several tax and financial incentives are available to Brazilian exporters, although the extent of these incentives has recently been reduced (Investment guide Brazil, 2001). Financial export support in Brazil is given in the form of tax concessions, export guarantee insurances and export finance. Export tax incentives are given in the form of exemption of taxation on sales. Also exports are stimulated by exempting imports of parts and appliances from import taxes. This is done to stimulate national production and exports. - 58 - The EMAP-Model The Export guarantee insurance on the other hand, is a good example of export guarantees as mentioned in the EMAP-Model. The Reinsurance institute of Brazil provides export guarantee insurance covering up to 90% of losses arising from political risk and extraordinary factors and up to 85% of losses emerging from commercial risk (Investment Guide Brazil, 2001). For export financing, banks provide financing for exporters against forward sales contracts and by discounting drafts accepted by foreign importers. This financing has also been made available for indirect exporters of manufacturing companies, which export through trading companies. Subsidized rate financing is also available for exporters registered with the National Development Bank (BNDES) and the Department of International Trade (SECEX). The Brazilian Central Bank allows banks to relend funds obtained abroad to Brazilian Exporters. Exporters may use these funds for buying raw materials (Investment Guide Brazil, 2001). Regarding the EMA by means of project participation, the Brazilian government stimulates participating in trade fairs and market visits. Exporters can apply for subsidies at the Department of International Trade (SECEX), to participate in these activities that are important for export involvement (Investment Guide Brazil, 2001; Seringhaus, 1986). 6.3.3 Management Support in Brazil Management Support deserves special attention as governmental and semigovernmental institutions become involved with business issues. Hence, the role of the government becomes more fluid in this respect. Due to the fact that privatization and a more pragmatic business involvement of the government is a relative new phenomenon, EMA by means of Management Support is a relative new means of export promotion. Specially in Brazil, this type of EMA can be regarded as controversial. The country used to have a closed economy till the 1980’s. The gap between government and society was very distinct. Research points out that companies do not appreciate governmental interference in operational business activities (Crick and Czinkota, 1995). Hence, this condition should especially hold in a country like Brazil. - 59 - The EMAP-Model Brazilian exporters do have the possibility, however, to gain from governmental management support in the foreign market. This is done by means of cooperation between the public sector and semi-governmental bodies, like chambers of commerce and trade. A recent development in this respect is the opening of foreign subsidiaries of bilateral chambers of commerce and trade in the foreign market. To illustrate: The German Brazilian Chamber of Commerce and Trade in São Paulo opened a subsidiary in Frankfurt to help Brazilian exporters in establishing market presence in Germany. 6.4 Sample Population To find further insights into the effectiveness of EMA programs, it is important to gain a better understanding of the population of Brazilian exporters. By means of such an evaluation, we can derive further conclusions about the relations between EMA needs of exporters. For this, the results of our empirical research will be used. In order to gain a better understanding of the nature of the respondents’ companies, the questionnaire contained two classification variables. First of all, the number of employees was used to act as an indicator for the size of the exporting company. Second, the percentage of export sales was asked, giving an indication on the importance of exports to the company’s revenues, hence, the importance of EMA. 6.4.1 Employees The distribution of the number of employees in the respondents’ companies is represented in table 5 below. Employees Frequency 0-100 101-250 12 2 251-500 501-1000 2 4 >1000 5 Total 25 Table 5. Company Size: Employees - 60 - The EMAP-Model Evidently, the greatest response was received from small companies in terms of employees as 48% of the respondents employed less than 100 people. After that, the results reveal that the biggest exporters replied 20% of the cases, coming from companies that employ more than 1000 workers. Sixteen percent (16%) of all respondents employed between 500 and 1000 workers and 2% of the responses came from both the 101-250 and 251-500 employees’ categories. Figure 4 gives a graphical representation of these data. 60 50 40 30 Percent 20 10 0 0-100 101-250 251-500 Employees Figure 4. Company Size: Employees - 61 - 501-1000 >1000 The EMAP-Model 6.4.2 Export Percentage As the need for EMA was expected to be strongly related to relative export sales, the export percentage was assessed in the questionnaire. From table 6 below, we derive the following observations. Export Percentage 0% - 9% Frequency 9 10% - 24% 7 25% - 49% 2 50% - 74% 3 >75% 4 Total 25 Table 6. Company Size: Export Percentage Most responses (36%) came from companies that had a relative low percentage of export sales, ranging from zero to nine percent. Whereas 28% of the respondents had an export percentage between 10% and 24%. As both these groups account for 64% of the respondents, it can be concluded that the respondents were mainly characterized by companies that did not engage in significant export activity yet. The three categories of export percentages between 25 and 49%, 50 to 74% and >75% accounted for the remaining 36% of the responses, as graphically shown in figure 5 below. - 62 - The EMAP-Model 10 8 6 4 Count 2 0 0% - 9% 10% - 24% 25% - 49% 50% - 74% >75% Export Percentage Figure 5. Company Size: Export Percentage 6.5 Data Analysis As stressed above, the response rate that our research revealed was too low to allow for an appropriate testing of the EMAP-Model itself. Focusing on the EMA classification model and the Research Problem however, we will now proceed with an analysis of the data that were gathered in our research amongst Brazilian Exporters to test hypotheses I through XIII. Analyzing the outcomes makes some interesting findings apparent. To assess the EMA effects on Export Marketing and Export Performance, this section will analyze the research outcomes using Independent Ttests. This procedure allows us to make a separation in high performing and low performing exporters in such a way that we can compare the use of the constructs of the EMAP-Model. This distinction will also be made in the use of strategic and tactical marketing tools by the Brazilian exporters in order to draw conclusions on the degree of EMA effectiveness. - 63 - The EMAP-Model 6.5.1 Parameters The split value that divides the high and low scores is set higher than the mean value of 3 on the 5 point Likert scales. Hence, the split-value that is used to divide the high and low values of the constructs was set at 3.50. The reason for this is that this distinction made the analysis more reliable in the respect of its outcomes. Here we argue that in order to be labeled a high-performing exporter, a firm should score higher than average. The same holds for the measure for good use of the Export Marketing constructs of Management Control, Market Commitment and the Marketing Mix variables in this study. Here, the Independent Samples T-test assesses the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the use of a particular construct for both high and low performing exporters on these constructs. 6.5.2 The Effect of EMA on Export marketing Information Provision and Marketing Starting out with hypothesis I., analysis points out that there is a difference in the use of Information Provision between exporters with high Management Control and low Management Control. On the base of a p-value of only 3.6%, the data clearly reveal a higher use of Information services for exporters with high Management Control. The influence of Information Provision on Market Commitment shows no significant difference between exporters with high Market Commitment and their counterparts with a p-value of 19.6%. In the light of the tactical marketing variables, EMA through Information Provision is important. For all the categories, the companies with a high degree of Marketing Mix adaptation attached significantly more value to governmental export information than exporters with low Marketing Mix adaptation (Appendix III). - 64 - The EMAP-Model Financial Support and Marketing The effects that EMA through Financial Support has on Export Marketing do not show an overwhelming difference between the two groups with the highest and lowest scores in the sample. According to the analysis of the answers of the respondents, the only significant difference that can be found is between the two groups of exporters that apply adaptation of the Marketing Mix through promotion. Here, the exporters that perceive adaptation of their promotional efforts in the foreign market as very important have a higher need for Financial EMA (See Appendix III). Management Support and Marketing The analysis of the data revealed no significant difference between the use of the EMA services for Management Support by high and low achieving exporters. On all the marketing variables, both Strategic and Tactical, Management Support was equally important to the exporters. An important observation is, however, that for the Strategic marketing variables Management Control and Market Commitment, the low performers gave a higher score to the Management Support variables than the high performers. Also the low performers in respect of promotion and place adaptation attached a higher value to EMA through Management Support. These differences were not significant however (See Appendix III). 6.5.3 The Effect of Export Marketing on Export Performance In order to gain a better insight into the relations between Export Marketing and Export Performance measures, the study assessed Export Performance on two levels. First the relations between the Export Marketing variables were assessed on the basis of the joint concept of Export Performance by taking the mean of the outcomes of the joint Export Performance categories used in this study. After that the effects of Export Marketing on the individual Export Performance categories were explored. - 65 - The EMAP-Model Strategic Export Marketing and Export Performance Looking at the joint concept of Export Performance by taking the mean value for the outcomes of all three categories, the analysis shows that only Strategic Export Marketing considerations differentiate the high performing exporters from the low performing ones. The data clearly indicate that high performing exporters have more Management Control over and Commitment to their foreign markets than their low performing counterparts on a 10% level of significance (See Appendix III). When looking at the individual categories of Export Performance, some further observations of interest become apparent. First of all, the Financial Export Performance of the respondents was equally influenced by all the Export Marketing variables. No significant differences between financial high and low performers were detected in this category. On the front of Strategic Outcomes, the second pillar of Export Performance, high-performing exporters clearly showed more Market Commitment on Strategic level. Tactical Export Marketing and Export Performance Regarding tactical Export Marketing variables, the Marketing Mix categories of Promotion and Channel Adaptation scored higher for the high performing exporters in the light of the Strategic Outcome of Export operations (See Appendix III). The third aspect of Export Performance showed only a difference in the degree of Management Control. High performing exporters on this category indicated a stronger importance for Management Control than the low performers. This indicates that more management Control leads to a higher satisfaction with the export venture (See Appendix III). 6.5.4 The Effects of EMA on Export Performance The analysis of the data revealed that there is a difference in the use of EMA through Information Provision between high and low performing exporters on aggregate level. Firms with a high overall Export Performance made significantly more extensive use of Information EMA services than low performers. The other two EMA constructs did not show a significant difference for the exporters. An interesting observation, however insignificant, is that the low performers attached a higher value to Financial EMA services than the high performers (See Appendix III). - 66 - The EMAP-Model On the level of the individual Export Performance constructs, no real differences were detected in the preference for EMA services between high and low performing exporters in the sense of Financial Export Performance. Again however, the observation of a higher preference of Financial EMA for financially low performing exporters is apparent (See Appendix III). Regarding the Strategic Outcome of export operations, Financial EMA has a clear preference of high performing exporters. Hence, exporters with a strong strategic outlook make more effective use of EMA through Financial Support. This also holds for high performing exporters in the light of Satisfaction with the export venture, the third category of Export Performance measurement. Furthermore the preference of Financial EMA services is here significantly higher for low performing exporters on the light of Satisfaction with the export venture (See Appendix III). 6.6 Discussion of the Results The previous paragraphs provide a good insight into the research findings. This section will give a deeper elaboration on these outcomes by integrating the findings with our theory review. This discussion will be concluded with an attempt to answer the research question about Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in Governmental EMA services. 6.6.1 EMA and Export marketing Management Control From the observations above, some interesting findings become apparent. First of all, Hypothesis I can only be rejected by means of Information Provision. This makes intuitive sense as information is of crucial importance for the degree of Control in management. It was to be expected that exporters with high Management Control rated the Information variable of EMA highest. For the EMA measures Financial Support and Management Support, there is no indication that exporters with high Management Control have other needs and preferences than exporters with low Management Control. It is not surprising that Management Support has the lowest rating however, as the service can be perceived negatively by exporters. - 67 - The EMAP-Model This holds, as exporters can be reluctant for interference in their business process by the EMA provider, as was already observed by Crick and Czinkota (1995). The consensus about Financial EMA can be seen as an indication that Management Control is a factor influenced by many factors other than financial loans and guarantees. Specially the condition that the sample population consisted of mainly small exporters makes Management Control a factor that has no top priority yet. This is in line with the theory of market entry strategies, as described by Root (1987). Market Commitment The research showed no significant difference in preference for one of the EMA variables in the light of high and low Market Commitment. This observation makes us accept Hypothesis II. Again, a possible reason for this observation is that the sample population consisted of a limited number of small exporters in terms of both relative export sales and number of employees. Although insignificant, the observation of a higher mean for Management Support from low Commitment exporters might be explained by an uncooperative attitude. Free riding on governmental management incentives might be perceived as a means to make short term profit from a particular service, which would not be unthinkable considering Brazilian (business) culture. Product Adaptation Both exporters that applied high and low Product Adaptation had no significant different perceptions towards EMA through Financial Support and Management Support. Regarding Information Provision, Hypothesis III can be rejected though. Brazilian Exporters that apply a high degree of Product Adaptation rated the use of Information services significantly higher than exporters with low Product Adaptation. This can be explained by the necessity of information as a resource for an appropriate adaptation strategy. These strategies require a firm to be able to respond to local conditions in a foreign market, as described by Cavusgil (1994). - 68 - The EMAP-Model Price Adaptation Just like the Product Adaptation do Exporters with a high degree of Price Adaptation give Information Provision a significantly higher rating than low price adapting exporters. Again, the condition that the Exporter has to be able to respond to foreign market changes makes Export Information of crucial importance. For the other two factors of EMA financial Support and Management Support, Hypothesis IV has to be accepted. Promotion Adaptation Hypothesis V can be rejected for both Information Provision and Financial Support. Assessing these outcomes brings us at the same conclusions in the light of Information provision as in the previous Marketing Mix adaptation variables: exporters with a high degree of Promotion Adaptation have to be able to respond to foreign market conditions. Export Information is crucial in this respect. Regarding Financial EMA services, exporters with high Promotion Adaptation attach a significant higher value to the Financial EMA services than low Promotion Adaptation Exporters. This observation can be explained by the fact that the competitive pressures in the export market determine the need of Promotion Adaptation (Cavusgil, 1994). As of this condition, Financial EMA services are more important for high Product Adaptation exporters as they serve as a means of risk protection (Czinkota, 1998). Management Support is rated equally again by the Brazilian respondents for both high and low Promotion Adaptation exporters. Apparently is this form of EMA not properly established as it could be of great help for the practical execution of an Export Marketing Strategy in a foreign market. Distribution Adaptation On the basis of the data analysis, we can only reject Hypothesis VI for Information Provision for the same reasons that are listed in the previous Marketing Mix Adaptation variables above. It is surprising however to see that Financial Support as well as Management Support do not receive higher scores from the side of high Place Adaptation Exporters. The Adaptation of a distribution channel is often founded with the objective of initiating and sustaining mutually beneficial relationships with foreign partners in the supply chain. As these objectives require sales force training, technical support and marketing know how, a clear preference for both Financial and Management Support EMA was to be expected (Cavusgil, 1994). - 69 - The EMAP-Model 6.6.2 Export Marketing and Export Performance Aggregate Export performance When assessing the concepts of Export Performance jointly, the analysis pointed out that only Strategic Export Marketing variables were significantly different between high and low performing exporters. This observation was to be expected as theory and practice shows that Market Commitment and Management Control have a positive effect on performance (Skarmeas, 2002). These observations can make us reject hypotheses VII and VIII, implying that exporters with high Management Control and Market Commitment perform better than exporters with low Control and Commitment over and to their export markets. From a Transaction Cost Perspective this can be explained as Managment Control and Market Commitment enhance the responsiveness of exporters to opportunistic behavior and uncertainty (Kotabe, 1998). For Tactical Export Marketing practice this link is not so apparent, although Marketing Mix considerations are an important aspect for the performance of a firm. This is in favor of Hypotheses IX through XII. Financial Export Performance When assessing the Export Performance variables separately, the Financial Export Performance dimension shows no significant differences in one of the six Export Marketing variables. Both high and low performers on the Financial EXPERF dimension have the same degree of Market Commitment, Management Control and Marketing Mix adaptation. This outcome was not to be expected, as Financial Export Performance is the most concrete and measurable dimension of the construct, compared to Strategic Export Performance and Satisfaction with the export venture. There is a chance however that the respondents in the research were moderate in their statements, as they might want to keep their financial record confidential. Strategic Export Performance In contrast to the Financial Export Performance data, the Strategic dimension of Export Performance shows a significant difference between high and low performing exporters. First of all do exporters with a high Market Commitment score significantly higher on Strategic Export Performance than low Commitment exporters. - 70 - The EMAP-Model As this research applied the Behavioral Commitment dimension in the questionnaire, the degree to which an exporter provided special help to its overseas business partner was assessed (Skarmeas et al, 2002). As marketing strategy is clearly a long term process that requires a mutual effort of the involved parties, it is plausible to assume that Exporters with high Market Commitment perform better in the light of their strategic goals. Regarding the Tactical marketing variables, Promotion and Place adaptation showed significant differences between the high and the low performing exporters. These two Marketing Mix dimensions add to the strategic performance of a firm, as they are important aspects in carrying out the Export Marketing Strategy of a firm. Firms that apply a lot of Promotion Adaptation gain a higher Strategic Export Performance through their involvement with the foreign market requirements and, especially, their foreign customers. The same holds for firms that have a high degree of adaptation of their distribution channels. The only difference is that high Place adapters achieve higher Strategic Performance through their engagement and involvement with their foreign suppliers (Cavusgil, 1994). Satisfaction with the Export Venture As the analysis pointed out, the only significant difference in the sample of Brazilian Exporters on the front of Satisfaction with the Export Venture could be found in the Management Control dimension. Firms with high Management Control are more satisfied with the Export Venture compared to firms that have low Management Control. This condition can be explained by means of Transaction Cost Theory. As exporters operate in a highly competitive international business environment, transaction specific assets like know-how, proprietary technology and brand equity become valuable. As of this condition, a higher degree of Management Control is required for the company to protect itself from opportunistic behaviors and uncertainty (Kotabe, 1998). This can explain the outcome that high control exporters are more satisfied with the export venture than their low control counterparts. - 71 - The EMAP-Model 6.6.3 EMA and Export Performance Aggregate Export Performance When looking at the direct relationship between EMA and Export Performance in the research, Information Provision deserves attention when looking at the performance outcomes on the aggregate level. The analysis shows that exporters with a high overall Export Performance rate Information Services of EMA higher than exporters with a low overall Export Performance. This can be explained by the bare fact that the Information is of crucial importance in the export process. Firms that engage in trade fairs, market visits and the like are expected to gain more from the export process than exporters that do not. Experience in trade fair participation can for example significantly add to the potential success in the achievement of the business objectives of a firm, even for low performing exporters (Seringhaus, 2001). Financial Export Performance When looking at the financial dimension of Export Performance, we see that the data analysis does not reveal any significant differences between high and low performing exporters. Again it has to be stressed that this is a doubtful observation which might be caused by reluctance of the respondents to share financial information. As was already mentioned, the observation that the low performing exporters on this dimension attached a higher value to financial EMA was remarkable. Although the outcome was not significant, it might show that financially low performing exporters have a higher need for financial support than exporters that already score high on this dimension. Strategic Export Performance The Strategic Export Performance dimension showed a significant difference in the preference for Financial EMA services between high and low performers. Apparently do high performing exporters value the Financial EMA services higher than the low performers. An explanation for this observation can be found in the nature of the Financial EMA measures that provide risk protection for exporters. The Financial EMA services stimulate exporters to engage in international commercial transactions. This gives them the possibility to make competitive offers and to leverage accounts receivable (Czinkota, 1998). - 72 - The EMAP-Model By means of these conditions, using Financial EMA services can lead to a competitive advantage and, thus, a higher Strategic Export Performance can be achieved. Satisfaction with the Export Venture Finally, the Satisfaction with the Export Venture shows an interesting outcome in the respect of Financial EMA services. Here, low performing exporters ( exporters that are not so satisfied with their export venture) attached a higher value to Financial EMA services than their high performing counterparts. This indicates that the unsatisfied exporters expect that financial support brings them more satisfaction in their export business. This observation can be explained by the line of reasoning that argues that Financial EMA services can provide the firm with risk protection. This will lead to more successful exporting and to a situation wherein the expectations of the exporters are met, leading to more satisfaction with the export venture. 6.7 Limitations and Future Research The research was conducted within the span of possibilities available at that time. Due to limited time and financial resources, the full EMAP-Model and its hypotheses could not be empirically tested. The difficulty of testing the EMAP-Model is that it is difficult to collect data from exporters. Very often, exporting companies are not willing to share information about performance figures and their export operations. This condition can lead to a low response rate in empirical investigations, as was the case in this study. Appendix IV gives a deeper elaboration on possible factors influencing the low response rate of this research. As of these circumstances, single variables within the constructs of the EMAP-Model are not accounted for. Future research should attempt to account for these inconsistencies. Only if a significantly big sample size can be realized, more precise results can be acquired. By doing so, testing the full EMAP-Model and its classification model can be explored and tested for all the measures separately. A second point of consideration is that the Internationalization process of companies should be accounted for. The degree of EMA effectiveness depends on how far a company is in its internationalization process and the importance of it for the individual firm. Although the relation between Market Commitment and Management Control is used, future research should provide a further insight in the factors of the EMAP-Model in combination with the internationalization process of the firm. - 73 - The EMAP-Model Third, the current study does not account for a comparison of research results between countries. By conducting the same research in more countries, a better insight can be acquired in the effectiveness of EMA on Export Performance. - 74 - The EMAP-Model 7 CONCLUSION 7.1 Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes of EMA Programs From the data analysis and the discussion of the findings above, we will now try to come to conclusive answers to the research problem. This will be done by means of the EMA classification model that was developed together with the EMAPModel in the previous chapters. Financial Support First of all, EMA through Financial Support can be labeled as a Qualifier. Both high and low performing exporters indicated that they regarded Financial EMA services as being important. High performing exporters did this in respect to their Strategic Export Performance dimension on the EXPERF Scale. Low performing exporters gave Financial EMA services a higher rating on the Satisfaction with the Export Venture dimension, compared to their high performing counterparts. As financial funds do always add to the responsiveness of a firm, this outcome was to be expected. As the theory review already pointed out, both high and low performing firms welcome financial resources to strengthen their competitive position. Information Provision Second, Information Provision can be regarded as a Success Factor of EMA programs in Brazil. This can be derived from the fact that most high performing exporters indicated that they use EMA Information services to achieve their business goals. Also do Information Provision services score high on the ratings of exporters with a high Market Commitment and high Management Control, as well as exporters that apply a high degree of adaptation in their international Marketing Mix. As the data analysis revealed that no low performing exporters on all these dimensions rated Information Provision services as being more important, this EMA variable is a clear Success Factor. This observation can be supported by the literature study. High performing exporters make successful use of Information services of EMA programs and keep on doing this in the future. Low performing exporters often just start to acknowledge the importance of the EMA Information services on the other hand. - 75 - The EMAP-Model In the case of Brazil this is an important observation. Many exporters do not realize that there is a lot of information available for their export operations. This condition confirms the need for the strong emphasis that the Brazilian government puts on Export Promotion. As of these outcomes, Information Provision as a Success Factor deserves a strong focus for EMA programs in Brazil. Management Support The Third EMA dimension, Management Support did not show any differences in perceived effectiveness in both the high and low performing exporters groups. According to the classification model that we use, this EMA variable should be classified as being an Obsolete in EMA service provision. This observation is however not significantly founded by the study as many other factors play a role. To illustrate: Management Support is a relative new EMA category. Specially the Brazilian population of exporters is not familiar with the phenomenon yet. Also the immature status of most Brazilian export industries makes Management Support as an EMA variable of lower importance. It is not to be underestimated that the factor has great potential to become a Success Factor in the future however. In order for this to happen, Brazilian exporters have to develop into global players with a competitive advantage and professional export management. Obviously, this is strongly related to the position of the Brazilian Export Industries in international markets. It can be argued that management Support is most effective for stimulating Tactical Export Marketing activities as it affects the practical execution of the strategies that an exporter pursues. If this condition holds, it can be explained why Brazilian exporters do not rate Management Support as being important in the current study. Brazilian Export Industries are only in the beginning of their internationalization process. The main reason for this is that the majority of the Brazilian exporters lack the international experience that is needed to be successful in the global market place. Current EMA programs in Brazil should thus point their main focus on stimulating export strategy issues in order to build a foundation for future success in Tactical Export Marketing. By doing so, a good foundation for successful EMA through Management Support can be created in Brazil. - 76 - The EMAP-Model 7.2 Conclusion This research paper explored the theoretical relationships between governmental Export Marketing Assistance (EMA), Export Marketing and Export Performance. This was done in order to find an answer to the research problem with the goal to identify Qualifiers, Success Factors and Obsoletes in Governmental Export Promotion. After an elaborate theory review, an operational and a classification model were derived, named the EMAP-Model. The model explored the above mentioned relationships on three levels: Government Level, Firm Level and on the Outcome Level. On government level, the study revealed that EMA programs can be classified according to three main categories which are Information Provision, Financial Support and Management Support. These EMA factors have both a direct and an indirect influence on Export Performance. The indirect link was made through Strategic and Tactical Export Marketing variables. In order to test the EMAP-Model, hypotheses for empirical investigation were derived. By doing so, this study proposes a framework for empirical analysis. Next, a quantitative research amongst Brazilian exporters was conducted, leading to an approximation of the real effects of the EMAP-Model. Through quantitative research in combination with secondary data available, this research paper derived insights that can function as a basis for future research. As the analysis pointed out, the EMAP-Model has applicability in respect of both the direct and the indirect links between EMA measures and Export Performance. For the sample under investigation, Financial EMA could be indicated as being a qualifier for successful Export Promotion since both high performing and low performing exporters made significant use of Financial EMA services. EMA through Information Provision could be labeled as being a Success Factor since high performing exporters made significantly more use of information services. EMA by means of Management Support turned out to be an obsolete factor according to the quantitative study. It has to be regarded as a potential future Success Factor however, as the Brazilian export environment is still under construction. - 77 - The EMAP-Model LITERATURE LIST AND OTHER REFERENCES Articles Bateson, J. E. G. and Hui M. K, (1992). The ecological validity of photographic slides and videotapes in simulating the service setting, Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (2) Cavusgil, S., Tamer, Zou & Shaoming. (1994). Marketing Strategy-performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures, Journal of Marketing, 58 (1) Crick, D., & Czinkota, M. (1995). Export Assistance; Another look at whether we are supporting the right programs. International Marketing Revie, 12 (3) Czincota, M. (1996) Why national export promotion?, International Trade Forum,3 (2) Czinkota, M., & Ricks, D. (1981). Export Assistance: Are we supporting the Right Programs?, Columbia Journal of World Busines, 16 (2) Darling, J., & Postnikoff, J. (1985). Strategic Export Information for Small Businesses, Journal of Small Business Management,23 (4) Diamantopoulos, A., & Schelegelmilch, B. (1993). Understanding the Role of Export Marketing Assistance: Empirical Evidence and Research Needs, European Journal of Marketing, 27 (4) Gronhaug, K., & Lorentzen, T. (1983). Exploring the impact of Governmental Export Subsidies, European Journal of Marketing, 17 (2) Hadjikhani, A. (1997). A Note on the Criticisms against the Internationalization Process Model, Management International Review, 37 (2 Special Issue) Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.E. (1977) The Internationalization Process of the Firm - A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment, Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1) Lim et al. (1996). Competitive Environmental Scanning and Export Involvement; an Initial Inquiry, International Marketing Review, 4 (2) Papadopoulos, N., (2002). Toward a Tradeoff Model for International Market Selection, International Business Review, 11 (2) - 78 - The EMAP-Model Seringhaus, R., and Botschen, G., (1991). Cross-National Comparison of Export Promotion Services: The Views of Canadian and Austrian Companies, Journal of International Business Studies,22 (1) Seringhaus, R., and Rosson, P., (2001). Firm Experience and International Trade Fairs, Journal of Marketing Management, 17 (7/8) Seringhaus, R., (1986). The Impact of Governmental Export Marketing Assistance, International Marketing Review, 3 (2) Shoham, A., (1998) Export Performance: A Conceptualization and Empirical Assessment, Journal of International Marketing, 6 (3) Singer, T., and Czinkota, M., (1994). Factors Associated with Effective Use of Export Assistance, Journal of International Marketing, 2 (1) Skarmeas, D., Katsikeas, C., & Schlegelmilch, B., (2002). Drivers of commitment and its impact on Performance in Cross-Cultural Buyer-Seller Relationships: The Importer’s Perspective, Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4) Thomas, M., and Araujo, L., (1985) Theories of Export Behavior: A Critical Analysis, European Journal of Marketing, 2 (3) Walters, P., (1983). Export Information Sources-A study of Their Usage and Utility, International Marketing Review, 1 (2) Wood, R., Robertson, K., (2000) Evaluating International Markets; The Importance of information by Industry, by Country of Destination, and by Type of Export Transaction, International Marketing Review, 17 (1) Zou et al., (1998). The EXPERF-Scale: A Cross-National Generalized Export Performance Measure, Journal of International Marketing, 6 (3) Zou, S., & Cavusgil, T., (2002). The GMS: A Broad Conceptualization of Global Marketing Strategy and its Effect on Firm Performance, Journal of Marketing, 66 (4) - 79 - The EMAP-Model Books Boyd, W, Marketing Management; A Strategic Approach, 4th Edition, Mc Graw & Hill, 2002. Bruner, G., & Hensel, P., Marketing Scales Handbook; A Compilation of Multi-item Measures, Volume II, American Marketing Association, Chicago Churchill, G., A., Basic Marketing Research, The Dryden Press, Dryden, 1996. Czinkota, M., Marketing Management; Text and Cases, Cambridge Mass., Blackwell, 1997. Czinkota, M, International Marketing, 5th edition, Ford Worth, Dryden, 1998. Green, S.B., Salkind, N.J., and Akey, T.M.,. Using SPSS for windows: Analyzing and Understaning Data, second edition, Upper-Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 2000 Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C.,. Multivariate Data Analysis, fifth edition, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 1998. Hofstede, G., Organizational cultures, beyond the fad: a qualitative/quantitative study across twenty cases, Maastricht, 1988. Malhotra, N.K., and Briks, D.F.,. Marketing Research, An Applied Approach. European Edition, Essex, Prentice-Hall, 1999. Root, F., Entry Strategies in Foreign Markets, D.C. Heath and Company, 1982. - 80 - The EMAP-Model Other References http://www.apexbrasil.com.br/documentos/RELPRO_SITE.xls www.apexbrasil.com.br N.A., Government Sponsored Trade Missions: Low Risk, Low Cost Venue for Growing International Sales, Ioma´s Report on Managing Exports, October 2003 German Brazilian Chamber of Commerce and Trade, (2003)., Investment Guide Brazil, AHK São Paulo, Brazil, Doctor, M., Workshop Report, Towards a new export promotion agenda in Brazil Centre for Brazilian Studies, 14 March 2003 www.abicalcados.com.br www.brazil4export.com www.evd.nl www.fortschritt-consulting.com - 81 - The EMAP-Model APPENDIX I – QUESTIONNAIRES English version Improving Services for Export Promotion As a Master student in International Business (International Marketing) at Maastricht University in the Netherlands, I am currently conducting a study on Export Assistance in cooperation with the German Brazilian Chamber of Commerce (AHK-São Paulo) and APEX. The aim of this study is to improve governmental services for export promotion. Therefore, I highly appreciate your contribution and interest in this research. Filling in this questionnaire does not take more than 5 minutes. In case you do not consider yourself as well-enough informed to fill in these questions, we would like to ask you to forward it to a colleague of yours who is. The data which result from this survey will be reported in my Master thesis. Never will I report on scores of individual respondents nor will I link scores to company names. The anonymity and confidentiality of this survey is guaranteed. For more information you can contact Dr. Piet Pauwels, the supervisor of this project at p.pauwels@mw.unimaas.nl. In case you are interested in the results of this study, you are free to fill in your coordinates at the end of the questionnaire and I will send you an executive summary of the main findings per E-mail by the beginning of May 2004. Again, I highly appreciate your input and precious time. For further information, please contact me via wo.rattink@student.unimaas.nl. Kind regards, Wolter O. Rattink Click here to go to the questionnaire - 82 - The EMAP-Model Please indicate on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) your level of agreement with each of the statements presented below: Please note: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral 4 = agree 5 = strongly agree 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 1 2 3 4 5 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ For my company, it is important to adjust our marketing programs for our foreign partners, if necessary □ □ □ □ □ For my company, it is important to respond quickly to a foreign partner’s request for help □ □ □ □ □ For my company, trade fairs are an important channel to obtain export information For my company, market visits are an important channel to obtain export information For my company, publications like export handbooks and market guides are important instruments to obtain export information For my company, it is important to obtain export information by the identification of import duties For my company, foreign contacts and local representatives are important to obtain export information For my company, governmental loans are an important financial stimulus for exporting For my company, governmental financial export guarantees are an important method to reduce financial risks For my company, participating in trade missions is only possible with financial support of the government My company extensively relies on third parties for international marketing research My company extensively relies on third parties for the establishment of foreign sales offices For my company, it is important to have full control over our export activities For my company, it is difficult to manage our export activities in the way we want it For my company, it is easy to influence our export performance For my company, it is important to commit much time to our foreign business partners - 83 - The EMAP-Model Please answer the following questions in respect to your company’s main export product to your main export market Please note: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral 4 = agree 5 = strongly agree 17. 24. For my company, it is important to adapt our products to the needs of our foreign customers For my company, it is important to adapt product components to local requirements For my company, it is important to adapt the product design to local market requirements For my company, it is important to adapt our advertising strategy to local market requirements For my company, it is important to adapt techniques for sales promotion to local market requirements For my company, it is important to adapt our distribution strategy to local requirements and market conditions For my company, it is important to adapt our prices to local market conditions Our export activity is very profitable 25. Our export activity generates a high volume of sales 26. Our export activity improves our global competitiveness 27. Our export activity strengthens our strategic position 28. Our export activity is very successful 29. The export activity meets our expectations 30. What is the number of employees in your company? 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23 31. 32. What is the contribution of exports to your total sales? 1 2 3 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 5 > 1001 0 100 101 250 251 500 501 1000 □ □ □ □ 0-10% 10-25% 25-50 % 50-75 % >75 % □ □ □ □ □ In case you have further comments, recommendations or critiques concerning these questions, please specify below: - 84 - 4 □ The EMAP-Model Brazilian version Melhorando serviços para melhor promoção de exportaçoes Como estudante de mestrado em Negócios Internacionais (Marketing Internacional) na universidade de Maastricht na Holanda, estou atualmente conduzindo um estudo sobre Auxílio de Exportaçoes em cooperação com a Câmara de Comércio e Industria Brasil-Alemanha (AHK-São Paulo) e da APEX. O alvo deste estudo é melhorar serviços para a promoção de exportação. Conseqüentemente aprecio calorosamente sua contribuição e interesse nesta pesquisa. O preenchimento integral deste questionario nao tomara mais do que cinco minutos de seu tempo. Caso você não se considere suficientemente informado para responder a estas perguntas, gostaríamos de lhe pedir que o envie entao a um colega que o seja. Os dados resultantes deste exame serão relatados em minha tese de mestrado. Nunca sera revelado o resultado individual dos constituidores da pesquisa, como tambem em tempo algum serao os resultados da pesquisa ligados a alguma companhia em particular. A anonimidade e confidencialidade nesta pesquisa são garantidas. Para maiores informaçoes, favor contatar Dr. Piet Pauwels, supervisor do projeto atraves do endereco p.pauwels@mw.unimaas.nl. Caso haja interesse nos resultados deste estudo, sinta-se a vontade para enviar suas coordenadas no final do questionário. Voce recebera um sumário executivo dos principais resultados por o E-mail no inicio do mes de maio 2004. Mais uma vez, aprecio sinceramente sua opiniao e seu precioso tempo. Para informaçoes adicionais contate-me wo.rattink@student.unimaas.nl. Cordialmente, Wolter O. Rattink Clique aqui para ir para o questionário - 85 - através do endereço The EMAP-Model Por favor, indique em uma escala de 1 (discorda fortemente) a 5 (concorda fortemente) sua opinião a respeito de cada uma das indicações apresentadas abaixo: Nota: 1 = discorda fortemente, 2 = discorda, 3 =neutro 4 = concorda 5 = concorda fortemente 1 Para minha empresa, feiras são um importante meio de obtenção de informações sobre exportação 2 Para minha empresa, visitas de mercado são um importante meio de obtenção de informações sobre exportação 3 Para minha empresa, publicações como manuais de exportação e guias de mercado são instrumentos importantes para obter informações de exportação 4 Para minha empresa, é importante obter informações de exportação sobre impostos e normas da legislação aduaneira 5 Para minha empresa, os contatos estrangeiros e representantes locais são importantes para obter informações de exportação 6 Para minha empresa, empréstimos governamentais são um estímulo financeiro importante para exportar 7 Para minha empresa, as garantias financeiras governamentais de exportação são um método importante para reduzir riscos financeiros 8 Para minha empresa, participar em missões comerciais é somente possível com suporte financeiro do governo 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Minha empresa confia extensivamente em empresas terceirizadas para pesquisas de marketing internacional Minha empresa confia extensivamente em empresas terceirizadas para o estabelecimento de escritórios de vendas no exterior Para minha empresa, é importante ter o controle total sobre nossas atividades de exportação Para minha empresa, é difícil controlar nossas atividades de exportação da maneira que queremos □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Para minha empresa, é fácil influenciar nosso desempenho em exportação Para minha empresa, é importante dedicar bastante tempo a nossos parceiros de negócios estrangeiros □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ Para minha empresa, é importante ajustar os programas de marketing para nossos parceiros de negócios estrangeiros, se necessário Para minha empresa, é importante responder rapidamente a um pedido de ajuda dos nossos parceiros de negócios estrangeiros - 86 - The EMAP-Model Favor responder as seguintes perguntas a respeito de seu principal produto e principal mercado de exportação Nota: 1 = discorda fortemente, 2 = discorda, 3 = neutro 4 = concorda 5 = concorda fortemente 1 2 3 4 5 Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar os produtos às necessidades de nossos clientes estrangeiros Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar componentes do produto às exigências locais Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar o projeto de produto às exigências de mercado locais Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar a estratégia de propaganda às exigências de mercado locais Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar técnicas de o promoção de vendas às exigências de mercado locais Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar nossa estratégia da distribuição às exigências e às condições de mercado locais Para minha empresa, é importante adaptar nossos preços às condições de mercado locais Nossa atividade de exportação é muito rentável □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ 28 Nossa atividade de exportação gera um volume elevado de vendas Nossa atividade de exportação melhora nossa competitividade global Nossa atividade de exportação fortalece nossa posição estratégica Nossa atividade de exportação é muito bem sucedida □ □ □ □ □ 29 A atividade de exportação atinge nossas expectativas □ □ □ □ □ 30 Quantos empregados há em sua empresa? 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 32 Qual é a contribuição das exportações em torno de suas vendas totais? 0 100 101 250 251 500 501 1000 > 1000 □ □ □ □ □ 25-50 % 50-75 % >75 % □ □ □ 0-10% □ 10-25% □ Caso possuir comentários, recomendações ou críticas adicionais a respeito destas perguntas, especifique-as abaixo: - 87 - The EMAP-Model APENDIX II - RELIABILITY ANALYSES Reliability Information Provision R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A) Item-total Statistics INFO1 INFO2 INFO3 INFO4 INFO5 Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 16.0000 15.4800 15.8000 15.4400 15.3600 10.2500 11.3433 15.0000 13.5900 13.5733 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .7803 .8395 .6061 .7349 .7020 .8499 .8216 .8800 .8526 .8582 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = 5 .8799 Reliability Financial Support R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 7.6000 7.9200 8.0800 2.8333 1.9933 2.7433 FINSUP1 FINSUP2 FINSUP3 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .3796 .6916 .3482 .6565 .2007 .7047 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = .6507 - 88 - 3 The EMAP-Model Reliability Management Support R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 3.0400 3.0800 1.2900 1.2433 MANSUP1 MANSUP2 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .4580 .4580 . . Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = 2 .6282 Reliability Management Control R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 6.4400 7.4400 7.4800 2.8400 1.5900 2.8433 CONTROL1 CONTROL2 CONTROL3 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .1893 .3041 .0642 .2230 -.1258 .4431 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = .3128 - 89 - 3 The EMAP-Model Reliability Market Commitment R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 8.5200 8.5600 8.1200 2.5933 2.3400 4.1933 COMMIT1 COMMIT2 COMMIT3 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .8219 .8540 .6716 .7404 .7151 .9110 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = 3 .8665 Reliability Product Adaptation R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 8.5200 8.6800 8.5600 3.2600 3.5600 4.0067 PRODAD1 PRODAD2 PRODAD3 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .8866 .8745 .8447 .8896 .8951 .9235 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = .9338 - 90 - 3 The EMAP-Model Reliability Promotion Adaptation R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 4.0000 4.1600 1.0000 .5567 PROMOAD1 PROMOAD2 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .7818 .7818 . . Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = 2 .8568 Reliability Financial Export Performance R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 3.2400 3.3600 1.0233 1.3233 FINPERF1 FINPERF2 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .7462 .7462 . . Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = .8506 - 91 - 2 The EMAP-Model Reliability Strategic Export Performance R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 4.0800 3.9200 1.3267 .6600 STRPERF1 STRPERF2 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .7196 .7196 . . Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = 2 .8080 Reliability Satisfaction Export Performance R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted 3.2000 3.2400 1.5833 1.3567 SATPERF1 SATPERF2 Corrected ItemTotal Correlation Alpha if Item Deleted .8188 .8188 . . Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = Alpha = 25.0 N of Items = .8989 - 92 - 2 The EMAP-Model APPENDIX III – STATISTICAL TESTS T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial support mean Management support mean Control mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 13 12 13 12 13 12 Mean 4.2769 3.5000 4.0513 3.8056 3.0385 3.3333 Std. Deviation .34194 1.10371 .74344 .73110 .87706 .80716 Std. Error Mean .09484 .31861 .20619 .21105 .24325 .23301 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 55.671 .000 .023 Sig. .000 1.000 .881 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 2.419 23 .024 .7769 .32116 .11256 1.44129 2.337 12.942 .036 .7769 .33243 .05843 1.49542 .832 23 .414 .2457 .29526 -.36507 .85652 .833 22.898 .414 .2457 .29506 -.36480 .85625 -.872 23 .392 -.2949 .33801 -.99410 .40436 -.875 23.000 .390 -.2949 .33684 -.99169 .40195 - 93 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial support mean Management support mean Commitment mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N Mean 4.0778 3.4571 4.0556 3.6190 3.0833 3.4286 18 7 18 7 18 7 Std. Deviation .75814 1.06904 .76909 .55872 .95871 .34503 Std. Error Mean .17869 .40406 .18128 .21118 .22597 .13041 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 4.353 .803 3.751 Sig. .048 .380 .065 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 1.639 23 .115 .6206 .37874 -.16285 1.40412 1.405 8.462 .196 .6206 .44181 -.38858 1.62985 1.361 23 .187 .4365 .32079 -.22709 1.10010 1.568 15.189 .137 .4365 .27831 -.15605 1.02907 -.920 23 .367 -.3452 .37544 -1.12189 .43141 -1.323 22.986 .199 -.3452 .26090 -.88497 .19449 - 94 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial s upport mean Management support mean Product Adaptation Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 22 3 22 3 22 3 Mean 4.0636 2.7333 4.0152 3.3333 3.1818 3.1667 Std. Deviation .76192 .92376 .72358 .57735 .88028 .57735 Std. Error Mean .16244 .53333 .15427 .33333 .18768 .33333 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed .333 .099 .379 Sig. .569 .756 .544 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 2.781 23 .011 1.3303 .47841 .34063 2.31998 2.386 2.386 .119 1.3303 .55752 -.73224 3.39285 1.556 23 .133 .6818 .43824 -.22475 1.58839 1.856 2.936 .162 .6818 .36730 -.50172 1.86536 .029 23 .977 .0152 .52818 -1.07747 1.10778 .040 3.436 .971 .0152 .38254 -1.11934 1.14964 - 95 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial support mean Management support mean Promotion Adaptation Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N Std. Deviation .56939 .95499 .69143 .62361 .78807 1.06066 Mean 4.2000 2.7200 4.0833 3.3333 3.1000 3.5000 20 5 20 5 20 5 Std. Error Mean .12732 .42708 .15461 .27889 .17622 .47434 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 1.683 .002 .010 Sig. .207 .967 .920 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 4.533 23 .000 1.4800 .32651 .80456 2.15544 3.321 4.735 .023 1.4800 .44566 .31482 2.64518 2.205 23 .038 .7500 .34006 .04653 1.45347 2.352 6.703 .053 .7500 .31888 -.01084 1.51084 -.950 23 .352 -.4000 .42092 -1.27074 .47074 -.790 5.160 .464 -.4000 .50602 -1.68875 .88875 - 96 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial support mean Management support mean Place Adaptation Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 17 8 17 8 17 8 Mean 4.2471 3.1750 4.0000 3.7917 3.0882 3.3750 Std. Deviation .60634 .95879 .82496 .50198 .85212 .83452 Std. Error Mean .14706 .33898 .20008 .17748 .20667 .29505 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 8.200 2.388 .175 Sig. .009 .136 .679 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 3.417 23 .002 1.0721 .31376 .42300 1.72112 2.901 9.732 .016 1.0721 .36951 .24566 1.89846 .655 23 .519 .2083 .31800 -.44950 .86617 .779 21.152 .445 .2083 .26745 -.34762 .76429 -.790 23 .438 -.2868 .36306 -1.03782 .46429 -.796 14.072 .439 -.2868 .36023 -1.05901 .48548 - 97 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial support mean Management support mean Price Adaptation Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 18 7 18 7 18 7 Mean 4.2333 3.0571 4.0556 3.6190 3.2500 3.0000 Std. Deviation .59111 .97101 .72536 .70523 .92752 .57735 Std. Error Mean .13933 .36701 .17097 .26655 .21862 .21822 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 7.276 .181 1.231 Sig. .013 .675 .279 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 3.719 23 .001 1.1762 .31630 .52188 1.83050 2.996 7.797 .018 1.1762 .39256 .26682 2.08556 1.361 23 .187 .4365 .32079 -.22709 1.10010 1.378 11.279 .195 .4365 .31667 -.25839 1.13140 .660 23 .516 .2500 .37871 -.53341 1.03341 .809 17.770 .429 .2500 .30889 -.39956 .89956 - 98 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean PERFMEAN >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N Mean 3.7692 3.3333 4.4872 3.8889 4.5128 4.0556 4.0000 4.0000 4.3077 3.8333 4.3077 3.7500 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 Std. Deviation .64384 .65134 .66130 .93564 .64715 1.15324 .81650 1.12815 .75107 .86164 .85485 1.13818 Std. Error Mean .17857 .18803 .18341 .27010 .17949 .33291 .22646 .32567 .20831 .24873 .23709 .32856 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed .279 1.144 2.438 5.755 .029 1.362 Sig. .602 .296 .132 .025 .867 .255 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 1.682 23 .096 .4359 .25918 -.10026 .97206 1.681 22.794 .096 .4359 .25931 -.10079 .97258 1.858 23 .076 .5983 .32196 -.06774 1.26433 1.833 19.653 .082 .5983 .32648 -.08351 1.28010 1.236 23 .229 .4573 .37007 -.30828 1.22281 1.209 17.007 .243 .4573 .37821 -.34067 1.25520 .000 23 1.000 .0000 .39152 -.80992 .80992 .000 19.937 1.000 .0000 .39666 -.82760 .82760 1.470 23 .155 .4744 .32260 -.19298 1.14170 1.462 21.945 .158 .4744 .32444 -.19859 1.14730 1.393 23 .177 .5577 .40049 -.27078 1.38616 1.376 20.374 .184 .5577 .40518 -.28650 1.40188 - 99 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Financial Performance Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 Mean 3.6667 3.4615 4.3056 4.1026 4.1944 4.3846 4.0000 4.0000 4.0833 4.0769 4.0000 4.0769 Std. Deviation .61955 .72697 .71715 .96594 1.01959 .88030 .85280 1.08012 .79296 .88615 1.04447 1.03775 Std. Error Mean .17885 .20163 .20702 .26790 .29433 .24415 .24618 .29957 .22891 .24577 .30151 .28782 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed .080 .635 .155 3.242 .030 .007 Sig. .780 .434 .698 .085 .865 .934 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper .756 23 .457 .2051 .27131 -.35611 .76637 .761 22.868 .454 .2051 .26952 -.35259 .76285 .592 23 .559 .2030 .34269 -.50591 .91189 .600 22.038 .555 .2030 .33857 -.49910 .90508 -.500 23 .622 -.1902 .38009 -.97645 .59611 -.497 21.859 .624 -.1902 .38241 -.98354 .60320 .000 23 1.000 .0000 .39152 -.80992 .80992 .000 22.491 1.000 .0000 .38775 -.80313 .80313 .019 23 .985 .0064 .33742 -.69159 .70441 .019 22.983 .985 .0064 .33586 -.68840 .70122 -.185 23 .855 -.0769 .41672 -.93897 .78513 -.185 22.815 .855 -.0769 .41683 -.93959 .78575 - 100 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Strategic Performance Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 Mean 3.6333 3.2667 4.4000 3.4000 4.3667 4.0000 3.9500 4.2000 4.2500 3.4000 4.2500 3.2000 Std. Deviation .73270 .14907 .81363 .36515 .82292 1.37437 .94451 1.09545 .80296 .54772 .91047 1.09545 Std. Error Mean .16384 .06667 .18193 .16330 .18401 .61464 .21120 .48990 .17955 .24495 .20359 .48990 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed 2.975 3.412 .935 .931 1.783 .720 Sig. .098 .078 .344 .345 .195 .405 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 1.096 23 .284 .3667 .33442 -.32513 1.05846 2.073 22.839 .050 .3667 .17688 .00062 .73271 2.649 23 .014 1.0000 .37751 .21907 1.78093 4.090 15.172 .001 1.0000 .24447 .47944 1.52056 .778 23 .444 .3667 .47115 -.60798 1.34131 .571 4.741 .594 .3667 .64159 -1.31005 2.04338 -.514 23 .612 -.2500 .48622 -1.25583 .75583 -.469 5.584 .657 -.2500 .53348 -1.57930 1.07930 2.223 23 .036 .8500 .38236 .05904 1.64096 2.799 8.911 .021 .8500 .30371 .16193 1.53807 2.222 23 .036 1.0500 .47262 .07231 2.02769 1.979 5.467 .100 1.0500 .53052 -.27946 2.37946 - 101 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Satisfaction Performance Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 Mean 3.8462 3.2500 4.3333 4.0556 4.4615 4.1111 3.8462 4.1667 4.1538 4.0000 4.2308 3.8333 Std. Deviation .50213 .71244 .75768 .94102 .63155 1.18350 .80064 1.11464 .80064 .87905 .83205 1.19342 Std. Error Mean .13927 .20566 .21014 .27165 .17516 .34165 .22206 .32177 .22206 .25376 .23077 .34451 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Control mean Commitment mean Product Adaptation Mean Price Adaptation Mean Promotion Adaptation Mean Place Adaptation Mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed .242 .136 3.612 4.262 .046 3.054 Sig. .628 .716 .070 .050 .833 .094 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 2.434 23 .023 .5962 .24492 .08950 1.10280 2.400 19.619 .026 .5962 .24838 .07739 1.11491 .816 23 .423 .2778 .34040 -.42639 .98194 .809 21.159 .428 .2778 .34344 -.43612 .99168 .934 23 .360 .3504 .37510 -.42554 1.12639 .913 16.498 .375 .3504 .38393 -.46148 1.16234 -.831 23 .415 -.3205 .38577 -1.11855 .47752 -.820 19.846 .422 -.3205 .39095 -1.13643 .49541 .458 23 .651 .1538 .33589 -.54100 .84869 .456 22.307 .653 .1538 .33720 -.54491 .85260 .972 23 .341 .3974 .40871 -.44805 1.24292 .958 19.489 .350 .3974 .41466 -.46898 1.26385 - 102 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Sta tisti cs Information mean Financ ial s upport mean Management s upport mean PERFMEAN >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N 13 12 13 12 13 12 Mean 4.3231 3.4500 3.8718 4.0000 3.3077 3.0417 St d. Deviation .35155 1.05873 .70104 .79137 .96907 .68948 St d. Error Mean .09750 .30563 .19443 .22845 .26877 .19903 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 49.920 .005 1.689 Sig. .000 .947 .207 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 2.814 23 .010 .8731 .31023 .23131 1.51484 2.722 13.227 .017 .8731 .32081 .18123 1.56493 -.430 23 .672 -.1282 .29848 -.74566 .48925 -.427 22.085 .673 -.1282 .29999 -.75020 .49379 .785 23 .441 .2660 .33905 -.43535 .96741 .795 21.663 .435 .2660 .33445 -.42820 .96025 - 103 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial s upport mean Management support mean Financial Performance Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N Mean 4.1167 3.7077 3.8056 4.0513 3.4167 2.9615 12 13 12 13 12 13 Std. Deviation .70043 1.00537 .68841 .77991 .92524 .72058 Std. Error Mean .20220 .27884 .19873 .21631 .26709 .19985 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 4.657 .008 .559 Sig. .042 .929 .462 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 1.170 23 .254 .4090 .34945 -.31392 1.13186 1.187 21.464 .248 .4090 .34443 -.30638 1.12432 -.832 23 .414 -.2457 .29526 -.85652 .36507 -.837 22.961 .411 -.2457 .29374 -.85343 .36197 1.378 23 .181 .4551 .33019 -.22792 1.13818 1.364 20.791 .187 .4551 .33359 -.23902 1.14928 - 104 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial s upport mean Management support mean Strategic Performance Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N Mean 4.1100 3.0800 4.0833 3.3333 3.2250 3.0000 20 5 20 5 20 5 Std. Deviation .66956 1.20499 .69143 .62361 .89553 .61237 Std. Error Mean .14972 .53889 .15461 .27889 .20025 .27386 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 7.228 .002 1.019 Sig. .013 .967 .323 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 2.610 23 .016 1.0300 .39461 .21369 1.84631 1.842 4.636 .129 1.0300 .55930 -.44240 2.50240 2.205 23 .038 .7500 .34006 .04653 1.45347 2.352 6.703 .053 .7500 .31888 -.01084 1.51084 .528 23 .603 .2250 .42653 -.65735 1.10735 .663 8.886 .524 .2250 .33926 -.54397 .99397 - 105 - The EMAP-Model T-Test Group Statistics Information mean Financial s upport mean Management support mean Satisfaction Performance Mean >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 >= 3.50 < 3.50 N Mean 4.1231 3.6667 3.6923 4.1944 3.1923 3.1667 13 12 13 12 13 12 Std. Deviation .66100 1.04563 .68667 .71715 .83012 .88763 Std. Error Mean .18333 .30185 .19045 .20702 .23023 .25624 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Information mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Financial support mean Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed Management support Equal variances mean assumed Equal variances not assumed 6.885 .036 .016 Sig. .015 .852 .901 t-test for Equality of Means t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper 1.316 23 .201 .4564 .34689 -.26118 1.17400 1.292 18.326 .212 .4564 .35316 -.28460 1.19742 -1.788 23 .087 -.5021 .28079 -1.08299 .07872 -1.785 22.636 .088 -.5021 .28130 -1.08457 .08029 .075 23 .941 .0256 .34352 -.68498 .73626 .074 22.492 .941 .0256 .34448 -.68785 .73914 - 106 - The EMAP-Model APPENDIX IV – RESEARCH EVALUATION This research paper was written with the aim to test the EMAP-Model, the conceptual framework that emerged from the theory review. Unfortunately, the response rate of our empirical study did not allow a proper testing of the model, as was initially intended. In this sub-chapter, possible reasons for this problem will be discussed. IIa. Research Approach As previous studies in the field of Export Promotion already revealed, there is a problem in acquiring empirical data in the field of export promotion. The reason for this phenomenon is that export managers in companies might not have the time and resources available to answer questionnaires. In order to overcome this hurdle, this research was conducted with only 32 questions, allowing the respondent to spend a minimum of time answering the questions. In order to reach this limited number of questions, not all the constructs were completely derived for the research. Reliability analysis shows however, that the constructs had a good internal validity (see appendix II). A second consideration that was made, was the choice of the sample. The sample was chosen according to the criterion that it should contain industries that make extensive use of export promotion programs. For this study, the Brazilian clothing and shoe industry and producers of technical equipment were targeted due to their strong focus on higher export margins (www.abicalcados.com.br; www.brazil4export.com). Third, the research was conducted using a self administered online questionnaire, allowing the respondents to just click their way through. By means of these measures, the response rate was expected to be higher than in case of a regular mailing, including the full measures to the constructs. - 107 - The EMAP-Model IIb Shortcomings However Brazilian exporters seem to be excited about the EMA measures that are offered, it has to be concluded that the response rate of the survey was very low (5%). There are a number of reasons that might explain this low response rate. First of all, it has to be acknowledged that Brazil has no significant export history. Exporting is a new phenomenon amongst Brazilian companies. As figure 6 shows, Brazil only has a low internationalization level. The figure represents the relative export percentage of the GDP of several countries. Clearly, Brazil does not score high on internationalization. Hence, this condition makes the familiarity with the services of governmental and semi-governmental EMA initiatives lower. Figure 6. Relative Export Participation to GNP (Billion US$) Fortschritt Consulting 2003 Compared to e.g. The Netherlands, the internationalization of the Brazilian economy is minimal. Obviously, several factors distinguishing both countries lead to this condition. First of all, Brazil is not as developed as many western countries yet. Still, there are some major hurdles in e.g. customs, bureaucracy, infrastructure and politics to be overcome. - 108 - The EMAP-Model These data are confirmed by the Brazilian ministry of foreign trade, stating that 50% of all export companies in Brazil account for less than 0,5% of all exports (Brazil4export.com). As of these conditions, a lot of companies do not have an export department or even an export manager. Whereas most developed countries have already a significant export balance, Brazil is clearly lacking export experience. This condition might have lead to a non-reply on the survey as many respondents thought that they were not in the position to answer the questions. The strong hierarchy in Brazilian companies might have lead to situations wherein respondents felt to be not responsible for answering the questions. IIc. Socio-Economic Conditions Besides the lack of export experience, another reson for the low response rate has to be sought in the fact that Brazil is a relative young economy in terms of international trade. It was only in the second half of the 1990’s that Brazil opened its borders to the world economy. Before that, the country was a self sufficient economy. Although the Brazilian economy experienced an amazing growth in this relatively short period, socio-economic conditions of the past are still embeded in the minds of many exporters. This makes many exporting companies reluctant to share information with third parties, specially when there is a link with a governmental institution. Furthermore might the use of a structured empirical research amongst Brazilians not be the best alternative to gain information. According to Hofstede (1987) The Brazilian culture is characterized by a strong hierarchy and a large powerdistance, making personal interaction and connections of crucial importance. Taking these considerations into account, a research of a more qualitative nature could have been more appropriate in the Brazilian business environment. The EMAP-Model requires empirical testing however, so that future research should account for these cultural and political factors on a multi country basis. - 109 - The EMAP-Model IId.Coordination A third problem that was encountered in conducting the empirical research was the coordination of the efforts. A big amount of time resources was needed to make translations. This became a problem as adaptations in the research approach could not be made due to time and money constraints. Specially the time needed to put the Brazilian questionnaire on a Dutch website, did exceed the time period that was accounted for it. Clearly, communication errors emerged form misinterpretation due to the language barrier. A further drawback in the coordination was the distance between the partners for the research. A more throughout effort should have been made during contact with and physical presence in the country. - 110 -