KIN 507 Motor Control Lecture notes Fall 2012 Dr. Gordon Chalmers Dept. of PEHR Kinesiology & Physical Education Program Western Washington University 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. RESEARCH INVESTIGATION PAPER You will select a motor control topic that interests you (see example topics later in assignment description). Your investigation should start with a REVIEW of the critical issues in your topic. This forms approximately 80% of your report. This is like the literature review of your thesis proposal and final thesis. The viewpoints of multiple investigators must be included. In this section it is important to address the strong points and limitations of each study. A Summary - Consensus of conclusions or points of disagreement between different investigations must be discussed. This is a critical section that allows you to draw together the results from different studies in different sections of your paper. Finally, from this review and understanding you have gained, one key issue which you see that is not addressed (a question unanswered) must be identified. It should follow logically from the summary you have done. You then discuss this issue you have identified. Why is this key issue a critical and important question, and how you would address it (i.e., how would you potentially experimentally examined the unanswered question). There must be a clear explanation of why you have selected a certain aspect of your topic for further investigation, and how you would do it. The method described must be realistic. Each of the topics underlined above corresponds to a section in the grading sheet for evaluation of the paper. To help organize your paper it is required to have the following three major sections identified using APA style headings: Review of the literature, Summary - Consensus of conclusions or points of disagreement, A key issue: Why and how to address it. The use of these three section headings within your paper is required to help it be organized and more easily readable. For this research a major emphasis is on your REVIEW of current knowledge on your topic. Note in the grading sheet that the review is in three sections for grading because the review is heavily weighted. The review of the literature section is to be broken into subtopics, these major subtopics will have sections headings to allow for coherent organization of facts and ideas (see APA style guide for instructions on levels of headings). Each subtopic section is to start with a single powerful leading sentence that summarizes the findings of the section. Individual research articles are then discussed under that subtopic heading. Finally, a conclusion for that subtopic section should be made, in more detail than the lead sentence. An example for a paper titled "Motor Unit Changes with Aging" follows. Review of the Literature Introduction Put introductory paragraph in here Review of the Pertinent Literature Motor Neuron Death Powerful lead sentence. Study 1. Study 2. Study n Conclusion for this subtopic Muscle Fiber Biochemical Changes Powerful lead sentence. Study 1. Study 2. Study n Conclusion for this subtopic Muscle Fiber Distribution Changes Powerful lead sentence. Study 1. Study 2. Study n Conclusion for this subtopic Summary - Consensus of Conclusions or Points of Disagreement Put in pargraph(s) here KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 2 updated 6/21/12 RESEARCH INVESTIGATION PAPER A key issue: Why and how to address it Put in pargraph(s) here If you feel that using section headings as suggested do not apply to your topic, then talk with Dr. Chalmers. Your report must have a minimum of 15 references, cited in APA style. If you have not used APA style before, then it will be necessary to learn it for this assignment because you will also need it for your thesis. APA style extends beyond the reference style. All aspects of the paper formatting are defined in the style guide. Use the biomedical databases (& other sources) for your literature search. A list of web links for research in our field is on the course web page. A maximum of three book sources may be used. You can not use undergraduate or graduate text books as references. The use of non peer reviewed sources is rare in scholarly research in our field, so use it judiciously if at all. This includes the use of any internet sources that are not peer reviewed. The only internet sources that are acceptable are ones that provide scholarly information that is not available elsewhere. If you plan to use any internet sources it would be best to check them with Dr. Chalmers before you use them. You must ensure that you provide a reference for all statements you make in your paper which are not your own original thought. Also, you must use the most up-to-date information available as your sources. Biomedical information that is greater than 10-15 years old is likely out-of-date (Would you want your doctor or teacher to use only information that he/she learned 20 years ago and has not updated since? Staying current in your profession is crucial!). Cite only sources that you obtain and read completely. Do not use a reference that you only obtain the abstract for. You are not required to submit copies of your references with this paper. During evaluation of your paper, however, Dr. Chalmers may request that you provide your complete references within 24 hours, so keep them handy after writing the paper. The report should be 8-12 pages of typed double spaced text (this does not include the title page or the reference list pages). The grading sheet is to be attached as the last page of the assignment. Reading the grading sheet before, and during your writing, will help ensure proper organization and completeness. It is also recommended that you read Dr. Chalmers' "TERM PAPER & CLASS PROJECT SUBMISSION SUGGESTIONS" web page, which can be accessed via Dr. Chalmers' home page. For references you provide for this assignment, citation of the class lecture notes as a reference is not allowed. Ensure that your paper is checked by a human before submission. A paper that is only checked by a spelling checking program may contain grammatical errors, or errors of disjointed thought or poor organization. Only human checking by a person other than the original author can detect these sorts of errors. Report topic due date: The due date is listed in the course outline. You are to list your name, your topic, and a sentence or two explaining why you picked that topic. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 3 updated 6/21/12 RESEARCH INVESTIGATION PAPER Written report due date: The due date is listed in the course outline. Papers submitted after start of class on this date lose 10% of the maximum total marks per day, including each weekend day. Paper extensions and course incomplete grades: Extensions on the paper due date and incomplete grades for the course will be allowed only for documented medical reasons or very significant personal reasons. Presentation: On the date listed in the course outline, you will make a presentation to the class on the research you have done. The presentation will be graded on the clarity and organization of your presentation, your ability to handle questions, your comfort and poise in front of the audience, the ability to present without excessive dependence on notes, eye contact with the audience, and your voice projection. All of these aspects of your presentation can be improved by practicing your presentation. Review the presentation grading sheet as you prepare for your presentation. In class we will discuss further the features of a good presentation. Note that the conclusion for each subtopic may form a nice single slide which you can project as a summary, while you give the needed description of the underlying studies. Your presentation must include references to key studies discussed, placed after a stated fact. Below is a list of possible topics which Dr. Chalmers has thought up, or previous students have written papers on. They are intended to stimulate your thoughts on possible topics. The best topic for you will be one you have a personal interest in. Feel free to create your own topic, but be sure to discuss it with Dr. Chalmers. If you pick a topic listed below discuss it with Dr. Chalmers to ensure your cover it well, or to narrow the focus of your research. Locomotion control. Posture control. Balance control, and training for balance. Vestibular contribution to motor control. Vision contribution to motor control. Reaching, upper limb control. Paraplegia, neuromuscular problems and therapies. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for strengthening of muscle. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of paralyzed muscles. Maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Can people voluntarily produce 100% of the possible muscle force? Stress management / relaxation treatment affect on neuromuscular function, and/or assessment of treatments by neuromuscular measures. Mental practice and motoneuron activity. Proprioceptive training, of healthy athlete and/or rehabilitation following injury. Is it effective? (Not just a discussion of exercises to do) Force control & tremor, influence of training & aging (and other variables?). KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 4 updated 6/21/12 RESEARCH INVESTIGATION PAPER Changes in muscular contractile properties and motor unit control during muscular fatigue. Proprioception & prophylactic knee bracing. Velocity specificity of strength training. Muscle fiber type changes with chronic changes in endurance or power training. Motor control during neuromuscular fatigue (e.g., proprioception, coordination, motor unit control). Could include discussion of injury implications. Muscle coordination following anterior cruciate ligament injury. Nervous system contribution to fatigue of muscle (Neural fatigue). Can you recruit (activate) fast muscle fibers selectively to perform fast movments? Aging affects on some of the topics listed above. e.g., Aging effect on motor unit control. Posture control and aging. Fine motor control in the elderly. Training affects on some of the topics listed above. Changes in motor control during locomotion when wearing different shoe designs. The affect of exercise on neural and cognitive function in the elderly. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 5 updated 6/21/12 Motor Control Paper Grading Sheet Good Some Improvement Correct facts at Needed sufficient detail to Facts & detail explain explain issues, and issues, but more detail, written easily possible, or some presentation explanation confusing. without any Written presentation with significant errors some significant errors 5 4 3 FACTUAL CONTENT OF REVIEW 5 4 3 2 1 Exceptional Obvious extra & outstanding effort in research & reporting Weak Facts & detail do not explain issues, or some significant errors. Written presentation with very significant errors 2 Comments Missing TOPIC: Needs to be completely redone NAME: 1 0 Accuracy, clarity and detail of the review of critical issues in the topic. Strong points and limitations of each study. Accuracy, clarity and detail of the review of critical issues in the topic. Accuracy, clarity and detail of the review of critical issues in the topic. Summary: Consensus of conclusions or points of disagreement. IDENTIFICATION OF ONE RESEARCH QUESTION Key issues yet to be resolved. Why is it a critical and important question. How you would address it PREPARATION OF PAPER Paper and paragraph organization of material, use of headings to organize material (required), flow of writing. Spelling, punctuation, & sentence structure Minimum 15 references, 0-3 books & few to no select scholarly internet sources. No undergraduate or graduate text books as references APA style reference list, Correct use of citations within paper 8- 12 pages _____ Grading sheet attached _______ General Comments: KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 6 updated 6/21/12 Motor Control Presentation Grading Sheet Good Well done work in the category. Sufficient for a presentation at a regional conference, or a thesis defense. 4 Presentation of research review & proposal 5 4 3 2 Adequate Could be improved with a bit more effort or time devoted to the items in the category. 3 Weak Much more practice or time needs to be spent on this aspect of your presentation. 2 Missing Exceptional Obvious extra & outstanding effort in the category Sufficient for a presentation at a national conference. 5 TOPIC: Needs Help! NAME: 1 0 Comments 1 Key points clearly identified and communicated to audience, no use of excessive detail when it is not needed. References included Overall clarity and organization of your presentation Use of visual aids No excessive reading from notes Ability to handle questions, comfort and poise in front of the audience Eye contact with the audience, voice projection TIME: Within 2 min of target = 5; 2-3 min under or over time = 3; >3 min under or over time = 1; cut off by instructor due to excessive length = 0 General comments: KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 7 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units MOTOR UNIT = MOTOR NEURON AND ALL THE MUSCLE FIBERS IT INNERVATES MOTOR POOL = THE GROUP OF MOTOR NEURONS THAT INNERVATE ONE MUSCLE Motor neurons vary in SOMA SIZE The number of muscle fibers a motor neuron innervates is the INNERVATION RATIO The average innervation ratio varies between muscles: • one motor neuron innervates 15 muscle fibers (1:15) in the eye muscles • one motor neuron innervates 340 muscle fibers (1:340) in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (hand) • one motor neuron innervates 1,900 muscle fibers (1:1,900) in the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius muscles ALL THE MUSCLE FIBERS OF ONE MOTOR UNIT ARE SIMILAR CATEGORIES OF MUSCLE FIBERS The view, that exists in some “current” text books, such as… Exercise Physiology for Health, Fitness, and Performance (2007) By Sharon Plowman, Denise L Smith KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 8 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units The PROBLEM with above table is that the fiber size data does not match with research literature data on the size of human (untrained) muscle fibers. (samples shown below) Source: Campos (Males) Table 3 Mean fibre area (μm2) determined by myofibrilar ATPase histochemistry. Source: Kesidis (males) I Bodybuilders IIC IIA IIAX IIX 6,266 ± 1535 7,217 ± 1443 9,639 ± 1659* 7,976 ± 1231* 5,634 ± 1586 Physical education students 4,647 ± 1775 5,444 ± 2710 5,496±1408 4,673 ± 1089 4,323 ± 1113 Values are means ± SD. * Statistically significant between the groups, P < 0.05 Pretraining Female Mean fibre area (μm2). Source: Staron (1989) I IIA 4253 ± 949 3370 ± 1048* IIAB + IIB 2697 ± 931 Why does this problem of mismatched information exist ? Likely: ANIMAL data, in which FG, or IIB, fibers ARE the largest is reported in the tables of HUMAN anatomy and physiology textbooks. Myosin ATPase classification of fibers based on myosin enzymatic activity: I, IC, IIC, IIAC, IIA, IIAB, IIB. MEASURE OF CONTRACTION SPEED. MOST COMMON SYSTEM FOR STUDY OF HUMAN MUSCLE KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 9 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units Biochemical classification of fibers based on fast versus slow myosin ATPase activity and oxidative and glycolytic enzymatic activity: SO, FOG, FG. BEST FOR UNDERSTANDING METABOLISM, CONTRACTION SPEED AND FORCE. NOT WIDELY USED TO STUDY HUMAN MUSCLE. Because current human research on fiber type changes with training uses the I, IIA, IIB/X mATPase fiber type classification system… We need to start thinking in, and using, the mATPase fiber type classification system (correctly) if we are to read and understand the literature on human muscle fiber types and their changes with training PROPERTIES IN MYOSIN ATPase CLASSIFIED TYPES OF MUSCLE FIBERS (in Untrained Humans) MUSCLE FIBERS CALLED Male MUSCLE FIBER SIZE 1,2,3,6 Female MUSCLE FIBER SIZE 7 I (contains type I myosin) (contains types I & IIa myosin) IIA IIAB IIB/X (contains type IIa myosin) (contains types IIa & IIx myosin) (contains type IIx myosin) small large medium large Medium small CONTRACTION SPEED 4, 5 Male MAXIMUM FORCE slowest (based on fiber size and slightly greater specific tension in fast fibers) low OXIDATIVE CAPACITY 1,5,9 high GLYCOLYTIC CAPACITY 9 low low POWER 2 IC, IIC, IIAC slow intermediate fast fastest high medium high medium medium intermediate medium medium low low high high 1) Staron RS et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type adaptability to various workloads. J Histochem Cytochem. 1984 Feb;32(2):146-52. 2) Campos et al., Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 88, 50-60, 2002. 3) Kesidis, et al., Myosin heavy chain isoform distribution in single fibres of bodybuilders. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 103, 579 – 583, 2008 4) D'Antona G. et al., Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders.J Physiol. 2006 Feb 1;570(Pt 3):611-27. 5) Scott W. et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther. 2001 Nov;81(11):1810-6 6) Hather, BM et al., (1991) Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 143:177-185 7) Staron RS et al., (1989) Muscle hypertrophy and fast fiber type conversions in heavy resistance-trained women. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 60(1), 71-9. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 10 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units 8) Adams GR, Skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain composition and resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 1993 Feb;74(2):911-5. 9) Gregory CM, Vandenborne K, Dudley GA. 2001. Metabolic enzymes and phenotypic expression among human locomotor muscles. Muscle Nerve 24:387-93 In untrained muscle: Type IIB fibers: produce the greatest POWER (Power = Force x velocity of shortening) due to dramatically highest velocity Bottinelli R. and Reggiani C. Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2000; 73(2-4):195-262. BUT… The above Force:Velocity:Power curve is for single muscle fibers or single isolated muscles. The above Force:Velocity:Power curve has been used (see later in Motor Control Unit 8 discussion) to indicate that in humans produce PEAK POWER at approximately 30% 1RM when resistance training. The above Force:Velocity:Power curve does not represent the relationship between these variables when doing movements (including resistance training) due to: length:tension relationships, biomechanical angle of tendon pull, and the concurrent integration of these changing variables across the MULTIPLE muscles involved in a movement, even a single joint movement. The Force:Velocity:Power curve for a multi joint movement can be demonstrated for the BENCH PRESS. Cronin JB, et al. Force-velocity analysis of strength-training techniques and load: implications for training strategy and research. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Feb;17(1):148-55. Note: F:V curve not hyperbolic, Power:force curve rather flat (i.e., maximal power output is similar across a wide range of load and speed combinations). KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 11 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units ARE ALL 3 TYPES OF MUSCLE FIBERS FOUND IN ALL MUSCLES? “Most mammalian muscles, including those of humans, contain fibers with diverse histochemical characteristics and in this sense are “heterogeneous”. In fact, histochemically homogeneous muscles such as the cat soleus are quite exceptional” Cat Soleus: : 0-5% Type II (table 2 pg 370) Reference: Burke, RE, (1981) Motor Units: Anatomy, physiology and functional organization. In: Handbook of Physiology, Section I: Vol II. Motor Control Part 1. The nervous system. American Physiological Society, Bethesda MD Other mammalian muscles, including cat wrist flexors, are a mixture of fiber types. See: Gonyea WJ, Marushia SA, Dixon JA. (1981). Morphological organization and contractile properties of the wrist flexor muscles in the cat. Anat Rec. Mar;199(3):321-39 BUT proportions of fiber types within a muscle vary Large limb muscles 40-60% type I, in typical people IS EVERYBODY THE SAME? CAN YOU CHANGE YOUR % FIBER TYPES? Do genetics or training determine % fiber types? Endurance Exercise: increases the oxidative capacity of the trained fibers1,2,6. For low intensity aerobic training of typical people with approximately 50% type I fibers: very little activation of type II fibers (see subsequent recruitment unit discussion) For intense endurance training with activation of type II fibers: increases % IIA &/or IIAB, and decreases % IIB fibers3,5,6 , as IIB fibers change to express IIA myosin, and increase oxidative capacity greatly. (1-Taylor & Bachman, Can J Appl Physiol, 1999; 2-Hoppeler, Sportverletz Sportschaden, 1987; 3- Abernethy et al., Sport Med, 1990; 4Saltin & Gollnick, Skeletal Muscle Adaptability. In Peachey (Ed.), Handbook of Physiol, Sec. 10: Skeletal Muscle. Am Physiol Soc. 1983; 5 Campos et al., Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 88, 50-60, 2002.; 6- Scott W. et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther. 2001 Nov;81(11):1810-6) For intense endurance training: atrophy of type I1,2, , IIa4,5 or IIb5 fibers may occur3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Kraemer WJ, et al., Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol. 1995 Mar;78(3):976-89 Deschenes MR, Maresh CM, Crivello JF, Armstrong LE, Kraemer WJ, Covault J. The effects of exercise training of different intensities on neuromuscular junction morphology. J Neurocytol. 1993 Aug;22(8):603-15. Terrados N, Melichna J, Sylvén C, Jansson E. Decrease in skeletal muscle myoglobin with intensive training in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1986 Dec;128(4):651-2. Schantz P, Henriksson J, Jansson E. Adaptation of human skeletal muscle to endurance training of long duration. Clin Physiol. 1983 Apr;3(2):141-51. Staron RS et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type adaptability to various workloads. J Histochem Cytochem. 1984 Feb;32(2):146-52 OR, the endurance training does not need to be really intense to produce atrophy… Scott Trappe, et al., Single muscle fiber adaptations with marathon training J Appl Physiol September 1, 2006 101:721-727 13 weeks of run training in college students preparing for a marathon decreased muscle type I and IIa fiber size by ~20% (too low # of other fiber types to be examined). KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 12 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units Strength/power Exercise: increases the size of the trained fibers, all fibers trained in proper program. All fiber types hypertrophy9,10,11,12, hypertrophy greater in fast fibers1,2,4,6,10,11,12 AND Increases % IIA5,10,11,12 &/or IIAB6,8, and decreases, or complete loss of, % IIB fibers (1-Hakkinen, J Sport Med Physical Fit, 1989; 2-Tesch, Med Sci Sport Ex, 1988 Suppl; 4- Noble, Rice, Thayer, Taylor. Evolving Concepts of muscle Fibers. In: Poortmans JR (ed) Principles of Exercise Biochemistry, 3rd ed. Med Sport Sci., Basel, Karger, 2004, Vol 46, pp 36-61.; 5 - D'Antona G. et al., Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders.J Physiol. 2006 Feb 1;570(Pt 3):611-27; 6 Campos et al., Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 88, 50-60, 2002; 7 - Staron RS et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type adaptability to various workloads. J Histochem Cytochem. 1984 Feb;32(2):146-52; 8- Kesidis, et al., Myosin heavy chain isoform distribution in single fibres of bodybuilders. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 103, 579 – 583, 2008; 9- Scott W. et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther. 2001 Nov;81(11):1810-6; 10 - Hather, BM et al., (1991) Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 143:177-185. 11- Staron RS et al., (1990) Muscle hypertrophy and fast fiber type conversions in heavy resistance-trained women. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 60(1), 71-9. 12- Wang N. et al., (1993) Muscle fiber types of women after resistance training — Quantitative ultrastructure and enzyme activity. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology. 424(5): 494-502) E.G. Kramer, WJ, Strength Power Hour Radio Show Podcast, Show date: 4/28/08, Available at iTunes , also available: http://www.sphour.com Discussing crew athletes: “The IIx fibers have disappeared if you have recruited them”. IIX TO IIA fiber conversion occurs for either intense endurance or resistance exercise Most studies conclude: Endurance1,2,3,4,5 and Strength/power2,3 Exercise does not change the % fast & slow (1-Salmons, Int J Sport Med, 1994; 2- Abernethy et al., Sport Med, 1990; 3- Saltin & Gollnick, Skeletal Muscle Adaptability. In Peachey (Ed.), Handbook of Physiol, Sec. 10: Skeletal Muscle. Am Physiol Soc. 1983, also see Andersen, Schjerling & Saltin, Scientific American, 2000; D Pette, J Appl Physiol. 2001 Mar;90(3):1119-24.; 4- Noble, Rice, Thayer, Taylor. Evolving Concepts of muscle Fibers. In: Poortmans JR (ed) Principles of Exercise Biochemistry, 3rd ed. Med Sport Sci., Basel, Karger, 2004, Vol 46, pp 36-61.; 5- Scott W. et al., Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther. 2001 Nov;81(11):1810-6) Noble et al., Evolving Concepts of Skeletal Muscle Fibers. In: Poortmans JR (ed): Principles of Exercise Biochemistry, 3rd ed. Med Sport Sci. Basel, Karger, 2004, vol 46, pp 36-61 “…although it appears that transitions within fast fiber types may be relatively common, there is little evidence that fast fibers can readily convert to slow fibers with exercise training.” Yan Z. et al., Regulation of exercise-induced fiber type transformation, mitochondrial biogenesis, and angiogenesis in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2010 Oct 28. [Epub ahead of print] “… Endurance exercise readily promotes transformation from a glycolytic to an oxidative phenotype within the fast twitch fiber types (type IIb/x to IIa).” “… Exercise-induced transformation [from type II] to type I fibers remains to be experimentally confirmed.” Why older studies may show fiber type changes not currently believed to be valid based upon modern immunohistochemistry techniques. “…ATPase histochemistry is vulnerable to subtle changes in pH… Caution should be taken when interpreting the data, particularly in regard to changes in type I fibers.” KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 13 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units What about a recent study showing increases in % slow twitch fibers with training??? Gehlert S, Weber S, Weidmann B, Gutsche K, Platen P, Graf C, Kappes-Horn K, Bloch W. Cycling exercise-induced myofiber transitions in skeletal muscle depend on basal fiber type distribution. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct 29. 21 male cyclists with different performance levels and different initial % slow twitch fibers Trained with increased volume (3.3 hrs/d, 4 d/wk) and reduced power output for 3 months (early season training) Used ATPase staining to determine % fiber types (weak, older technique, see above caution) Results: o Group average data: Cyclists starting with a LOW proportion of slow fibers REDUCED IIa (p=0.01) & INCREASED type I (not sig). o Individual data: 4 Cyclists starting with a 50 – 83% slow fiber DECREASED % type I (!!!!!!!!) Can strength/power Exercise in humans cause HYPERPLASIA (an increase in the number of muscle fibers)? Due to splitting of existing mucle fibers or new fiber formation from satellite cells? G Goldspink and S Harridge, Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Adaptation in Skeletal Muscle. In: Strength and power in sport, 2nd ed. Paavo V. Komi (ed), Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2003, pp 231-251. “… animal experiments using normal changes in the total number of fibres.” types of exercise have not shown any JD MacDougall, Cellular Hypertrophy and Hyperplasia. In: Strength and power in sport, 2nd ed. Paavo V. Komi (ed), Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2003, pp 252-264 “Net increases in fibre numbers do not occur in health adult human muscle in response to resistance exercise; or, if they do, that they are of little numerical significance.” KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 14 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units Effects Of Genes On Structure, Function, And Performance CHARACTERISTIC EFFECT OF GENES POTENTIAL EFFECT OF TRAINING (i.e. typical environmental influences) Small Small Height, Length of Arms Large Muscle Fiber Composition Large (Fast- and Slow-Twitch) Mitochondria/Gram of Muscle Small Large Muscle Size Large Small Aerobic Endurance (e.g., Moderate to Small to Moderate distance running or cycling)# Large # Aerobic endurance is influenced by multiple organ systems, the function of some of which are largely determined by genes. So a large training effect on muscle enzymes does not mean a large effect of training on aerobic endurance. From: Skinner, J. S. (2001) Do genes determine champions? Gatorade Sports Science Institute, Sports Science Exchange #83, Volume 14 Number 4, Retrieved January 17, 2002, from http://www.gssiweb.com/reflib/refs/298/sse_83.cfm?btid=1 Effect of Endurance AND Strength/power exercise in the same person: Endurance training inhibits resistance adaptations1-3,5. Resistance training does not impair endurance adaptation1,4. a. b. c. Kraemer WJ, Spiering BA. (2006) Skeletal muscle physiology: plasticity and responses to exercise. Horm Res., 66 Suppl 1:2-16 Hakkinen K, Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training, Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Mar;89(1):42-52 : Noncompatibility of power and endurance training among college baseball players Rhea MR et al., J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):230-4. Exercise professionals seeking to develop evidence-based training programs rely on several training principles demonstrated through research and professional experience. In an effort to further research examining these principles, an investigation was designed and completed to evaluate the compatibility of cardiovascular endurance and neuromuscular power training. Sixteen Division-I collegiate baseball players were divided into two training groups with lower body power measured before and after their college playing season. The two groups differed in training in that one group performed moderate- to high-intense cardiovascular endurance training 3-4 days per week throughout the season, while the other group participated in speed/speed endurance training. A significant difference between groups (P < .05) was identified in the change in lower body power during the baseball season. During the season, the endurance training group decreased an average of 39.50 +/- 128.03 watts while the speed group improved an average of 210.63 +/- 168.96 watts. These data demonstrate that moderate- to high-intense cardiovascular endurance and neuromuscular power training do not appear to be compatible when performed simultaneously. For baseball players, athletes who rely heavily on power and speed, conventional baseball conditioning involving significant amounts of cardiovascular endurance training should be altered to include more speed/power interval training. d. : KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 15 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units Støren O et al., Maximal strength training improves running economy in distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jun;40(6):1087-92. PURPOSE: The present study investigated the effect of maximal strength training on running economy (RE) at 70% of maximal oxygen consumption [formula: see text] and time to exhaustion at maximal aerobic speed (MAS). Responses in one repetition maximum (1RM) and rate of force development (RFD) in half-squats, maximal oxygen consumption, RE, and time to exhaustion at MAS were examined. METHODS: Seventeen well-trained (nine male and eight female) runners were randomly assigned into either an intervention or a control group. The intervention group (four males and four females) performed half-squats, four sets of four repetitions maximum, three times per week for 8 wk, as a supplement to their normal endurance training. The control group continued their normal endurance training during the same period. RESULTS: The intervention manifested significant improvements in 1RM (33.2%), RFD (26.0%), RE (5.0%), and time to exhaustion at MAS (21.3%). No changes were found in [formula: see text] or body weight. The control group exhibited no changes from pre to post values in any of the parameters. CONCLUSION: Maximal strength training for 8 wk improved RE and increased time to exhaustion at MAS among well-trained, long-distance runners, without change in maximal oxygen uptake or body weight. e. Kraemer WJ, et al., Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol. 1995 Mar;78(3):976-89. WHY is concurrent Endurance AND Strength/power exercise in the same person incompatible for maximal gain in either of the two modalities? “Satellite cell response to resistance exercise is blunted when immediately followed by aerobic exercise…the physiological environment evoked by aerobic exercise might attenuate the eventual addition of myonuclei important for maximum muscle fiber growth…” L Babcock, et al., Concurrent Aerobic Exercise Interferes With the Satellite Cell Response to Acute Resistance Exercise. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 4, 2012 “… Competition between signaling pathways for synthesis of myofibrillar proteins and proteins associated with oxidative metabolism; i.e., increased mitochondrial biogenesis via AMP-activated protein kinase attenuates the rate of protein synthesis” You cannot have fibers that are maximal in BOTH size and oxidative capacity, you can maximize one OR the other only. van Wessel T, de Haan A, van der Laarse WJ, Jaspers RT. 2010. The muscle fiber typefiber size paradox: hypertrophy or oxidative metabolism? Eur J Appl Physiol. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1545-0 WHO needs to be concerned about the ability for Endurance training to inhibit concurrent Strength/power exercise effects? a) Generally… Non-exercise stimulus (e.g., infant and elderly aging, immobilization, muscle or nerve injury, spinal cord injury, polio, space flight) is required to change the % type I & II (i.e., give you more fast or slow twitch fibers) (Roy, Baldwin, Edgerton, Ex Sport Sci Rev, 1991) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 16 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 4: Motor units How to answer on a NSCA or other standardized certification test regarding fiber types, sizes and properties? Source: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning - 3rd Edition KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 17 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment TO TURN ON THE MOTOR UNITS OF A MUSCLE POOL THE BRAIN USES ORDERLY RECRUITMENT TO INCREASE MUSCLE FORCE MORE TENSION NEEDS MORE UNITS, BUT WHICH UNITS TO USE? RECRUITMENT IS BASED ON MOTOR NEURON SIZE Smallest motor neuron recruited first Next biggest recruited next .... Biggest recruited last Size = size of the motor neuron soma recruitment sequence increasing force requirement Input to a motor neuron pool goes equally to every motor neuron in the pool decending commands biceps 1a what fiber type is recruited first? what fiber type is recruited last? : Can you selectively recruit fast twitch motor units for ballistic contractions? : No, recruitment order the same, but all can be recruited virtually simultaneously (Zehr & Sale, Can. J Appl. Physiol., 1994, Enoka, R. M. and Fuglevand, A. J. Motor unit physiology: some unresolved issues. Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24:4-17) Force production by a muscle can be increased by: 1. Recruitment of additional motor units (discussed above) AND 2. Summation of twitch forces (rate coding of muscle force) Summation (rate coding of muscle force) Each stimulus of muscle (i.e. each muscle action potential) produces one muscle twitch. When muscle action potentials and resultant twitches are widely spaced (A), then the tension from one twitch decays to zero before the next stimulus and resultant twitch occurs. In (B) stimulus 3 (S3) occurs before the complete decay in tension from S2, hence, the force for twitch 3 adds onto the remaining force from twitch 2, resulting in greater maximum force in twitch 3, compared to a twitch in which there is no summation (addition of force because: all the Ca++ from twitch 2 has not been removed before a KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 18 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment new release of Ca++ for twitch 3, greater intramuscular Ca++ concentration and greater force results). In (C) stimulus 3 (S3) occurs immediately after S2, hence, the force (and Ca++) for twitch 3 adds onto the force (and Ca++) from twitch 2, resulting in greater maximum force in twitch 3, compared to a twitch in which there is no, or more widely spaced, summation. Below in (c), summation process described above occurs to greater degree when many stimuli are closely spaced. S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S Remember: As the frequency of stimulation of a motor unit increases (i.e., action potentials arrive more frequently) the resulting muscle force increases due to summation. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 19 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF SIZE ORDERED RECRUITMENT FOR MUSCLE PERFORMANCE? I IIa IIb Cat MG motor units types: S:28%, FR: 28%, FF 41.5% (unclassified: 2.5%) Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FE, Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):723-48 Human medial gastrocnemius : 50% type I, 50% type II Saltin & Gollnick, Sleletal Muscle Adapatability. Handbook of Physiology, Section 10, Skeletal Muscle, APS, 1983. walking running jumping Power (low, medium, high) Recruitment level (% of motor pool) Muscle fibers utilized (which type(s)) Are the type I fibers used in the sprint? Are the type I fibers contributing much force to the sprint? Assume 45% type I fibers. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 20 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment How do recruitment and summation work together as force produced by a muscle increases? MODERATE FORCE EXAMPLE Legend Motor unit not firing, producing no force Motor unit firing at a low frequency, producing low force Motor unit firing at a moderate frequency, producing moderate force Motor unit firing at a high frequency, producing high force Force level being produced KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 21 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment HIGH FORCE EXAMPLE Force level being produced Legend Motor unit not firing, producing no force Motor unit firing at a low frequency, producing low force Motor unit firing at a moderate frequency, producing moderate force Motor unit firing at a high frequency, producing high force TRAINING IMPLICATIONS OF RECRUITMENT ORDER: : When you go jogging, how much of your muscle is being activated & used and so stimulated to adapt? : What % recruitment does a sedentary person typically use? 1 - % Motor neuron recruitment? 2 - % Muscle mass activation? : What is the consequence of this low recruitment for people when they need to exert high forces? KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 22 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment Edgerton VR, Roy RR, Allen DL, Monti RJ. Adaptations in skeletal muscle disuse or decreased-use atrophy Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov;81(11 Suppl):S127-47. % of maximum leg press effort to perform task 22 year-olds (mean) Stair ascent Stair decent Chair rise 54% 42% 42% 74 year-olds (mean) 78% 88% 89% : When does someone who runs regularly ever use > 30% muscle activation? NOTE: IT IS POWER OUTPUT (in non-isometric task) LEVEL THAT DETERMINES % OF MUSCLE RECRUITED (not load lifted) : HOW CAN YOU TELL WHEN RECRUITMENT IS INTO LARGE FG MUSCLE FIBERS? Glass SC, Stanton DR. Self-selected resistance training intensity in novice weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 May;18(2):324-7 The purpose of this study was to determine the intensity of self-selected weightlifting exercise in untrained men and women. Thirteen men (age = 19.5 +/- 1.9, height = 70.0 +/- 2.4 in., weight = 174 +/20.1 lb, % fat = 14.3 +/- 6.7) and 17 women (age =18.7 +/- 1.0, height = 64.9 +/- 2.3 in., weight = 135.4 +/- 22.8 lb, % fat= 23.4 +/- 4.7) who were novice lifters completed seated bench press, leg extension, seated back row, military press, and biceps curl. Following self-selection trials, subjects' 1 repetition maximum (1RM) was assessed for each lift. Results showed that for both genders, self-selected loads were all below 60% 1RM. All lift intensities were similar for men and women (range = 42-57% 1RM). Repetitions completed and rating of perceived exertion responses were not different between KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 23 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment gender. Results show that subjects do not select a lifting intensity sufficient to induce hypertrophic responses and subsequent strength increases. Self-selected resistance training intensity in healthy women: the influence of a personal trainer Ratamess NA et al. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):103-11. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the influence of resistance training with a personal trainer versus unsupervised resistance training on the self-selected intensities used by women during resistance exercise. Forty-six resistance-trained women (age = 26.6 +/- 6.4 years; body mass = 64.2 +/- 10.9 kg) who either trained individually (n = 27; No PT) or with a personal trainer (n = 19; PT) were carefully instructed to select a weight they used in their own resistance training workouts that enabled the completion of 10 repetitions for the chest press (CP), leg press (LP), seated row (SR), and leg extension (LE) exercises. Each participant was subsequently tested for one repetition-maximum (1RM) strength on each exercise, and the self-selected intensity was calculated based on a percent of each 1RM value. For self-selected relative intensity, the PT group selected significantly greater intensities for LP (50% vs. 41%), CP (57.4% vs. 48%), and SR (56% vs. 42%) whereas a trend (p = 0.10) was observed for LE (43% vs. 38%) compared with No PT. Overall, the average self-selected intensity for all exercises was approximately 51.4% in PT group and approximately 42.3% in the No PT group. 1RM values for LP, LE, and SR were greater in the PT than No PT group. Ratings of perceived exertion values were significantly greater in the PT compared with the No PT group for CP, LE, and SR but not LP. These results indicate that resistance training under the supervision of a personal trainer leads to greater initial 1RM strength values, self-selection of greater workout intensities, and greater ratings of perceived exertion values during resistance exercise. At what age do you need to start exercising to be as fit and functional for as long as possible? Aoyagi Y, Katsuta S. Relationship between the starting age of training and physical fitness in old age. Can J Sport Sci. 1990 Mar;15(1):65-71. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 24 updated 6/21/12 Section 2: Muscles fibers types and their use Unit 5: Motor unit recruitment At what age do you need to start exercising to be as fit and functional for as long as possible? Answer: ??? Electrical stimulation of muscle: For healthy people: electrical stim does not add to strength gains from a strength training program electrical stim which does not produce significant muscle force does not result in strength gains due to low recruitment and lack of force generation (e.g., home muscle stimulation kits) For injured people: electrical stim does add to strength gains from a strength training program electrical stim does maintain muscle mass when a voluntary training program is not possible, if done correctly (i.e., sufficient recruitment & loading of muscle) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 25 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6a: Neuromuscular adaptations with resistance training What changes when a person weight trains to make them stronger? 6 months heavy resistance training plus explosive jump training ( Hakkinen et al, (1998) J Appl Physiol, 84:pp 1341). Isometric strength 36% 66% 36% 57% Men 40 Women 40 Men 70 Women 70 CSA 5% 9% 6% Observe the changes seen in the following 4 strength training studies: 1) THE INCREASE IN STRENGTH THAT OCCURS IN THE FIRST FEW WEEKS OF A STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAM PRECEDES INCREASES IN MUSCLE MASS muscle mass typically takes up to 8 weeks to increase significantly strength increases before this increased EMG is observed during these early weeks, when strength is increasing before muscle mass does (Komi 1986) 2) THE INCREASE IN STRENGTH THAT OCCURS IN A LONG TERM STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAM EXCEEDS INCREASES IN MUSCLE MASS Study A: 60 days of training Quad CSA 8.5% MVC 21% EMG 42% (Narici et. al., 1989). Study B: 8 weeks of training biceps CSA 6.5 MVC 36% EMG 11% (Moritani & Devires, 1979) In both studies, strength increased more than muscle size did. So muscle hypertrophy alone does not explain all of the strength increase. 3) AN INCREASE IN STRENGTH COMMONLY OCCURS IN THE UNTRAINED LIMB IN A UNILATERAL STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAM (Munn J, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2004 May;96(5):1861-6. Adamson M et al., Unilateral arm strength training improves contralateral peak force and rate of force development. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jul;103(5):5539.) Study A: 60 days, examination of untrained contralateral limb Quad CSA NO CHANGE KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 26 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6a: Neuromuscular adaptations with resistance training MVC 9% iEMG 25%(Narici et. al., 1989) Study B: 8 weeks isometric strength training, examination of untrained contralateral limb biceps CSA NO CHANGE MVC 24% EMG 21% (Moritani & Devires, 1979) These results in the untrained limb are similar to those seen in the first weeks of a strength training program, more force is exerted but with no hypertrophy. THE MECHANISMS FOR ABOVE STRENGTH INCREASES THAT ARE NOT PROPORTIONAL TO MUSCLE SIZE CHANGES MUST BE UNDERSTOOD, if we want to understand force production and training (to be answered below) 4) From Sale (1988) For the people who trained with a free squat: WHY is there less of an increase in knee extensor force under the different testing conditions using the same muscle? But… what exactly are the…“Neural adaptations to resistance training” that contribute to increased force production with training Neural adaptations likely to occur (based on study quality & quantity) in bold …. 1. Increased maximum EMG level seen, SOME studies in which MVC strength increases with training e.g. 3,4,9,12, due to increased motor unit firing frequency, produces higher maximum force from muscle. Increases in neural drive are observed to be greater for lengthening contractions compared to shortening contractions1. See figures below BUT: KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 27 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6a: Neuromuscular adaptations with resistance training a. Not all training studies show increased EMG with strength increases e.g., 9,13 b. Increase in motor unit firing frequency with training has been found in only some studies 6, 9 c. Increase in maximal effort motor unit firing frequency with training has been found to be much higher in elderly & moderately higher in young adults 10, OR has been found to occur in young, but NOT in elderly 11. d. The use of surface EMG to measure muscle activation level (neural drive) has recently been questioned 4, 9. 85% MVC FORCE EFFORT BEFORE RESISTANCE TRAINING HAS 100% RECRUIMENT (BUT LOW FIRING RATE IN LARGEST MOTOR UNITS) 85% MVC Force level being produced Legend Motor unit not firing, producing no force Motor unit firing at a low frequency, producing low force Motor unit firing at a moderate frequency, producing moderate force Motor unit firing at a high frequency, producing high force MAXIMUM FORCE EFFORT BEFORE RESISTANCE TRAINING Force level being produced Legend Motor unit not firing, producing no force Motor unit firing at a low frequency, producing low force Motor unit firing at a moderate frequency, producing moderate force Motor unit firing at a high frequency, producing high force KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 28 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6a: Neuromuscular adaptations with resistance training MAXIMUM FORCE EFFORT AFTER RESISTANCE TRAINING Higher force level being produced Legend Motor unit not firing, producing no force Motor unit firing at a low frequency, producing low force Motor unit firing at a moderate frequency, producing moderate force Motor unit firing at a high frequency, producing high force 2. Increased RATE of rise of EMG at start of force development 1,2,4,6 (increased doublets in motor unit firing at start of contraction1,6,9, lower recruitment threshold for motor units so they are recruited earlier as force is increasing 9), produces increased maximum rate of force development. 3. Reduction in the antagonist coactivation allows prime mover torque to not be counteracted by antagonsts. (remember: Coactivation of agonist and antagonists will work against each other and reduce the net torque (force) output from a agonist prime mover,) BUT: a. Reduced coactivation is observed in the elderly 3, 12 b. Reduced coactivation was observed in an isometric contraction in young subjects in which there was no increased EMG of the prime movers 14 c. Some studies find no decrease in antagonist activation with resistance training 15 4. Multijoint/multimuscle coordination for posture and stabilization 4. e.g., hip, knee, angle, trunk, contralateral leg, & arm muscle activation coordination for leg extension during kick 5. Increased recruitment of more motor units that were previously inactive in a maximal effort not likely, since limb muscle are likely fully recruited at 85% MVC force level 4, 9, 16 6. Increased synchronization of motor units firing, found in some studies, but not all 4. But synchronization, when it occurs, has not been demonstrated to increase muscle force 4,5 KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 29 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6a: Neuromuscular adaptations with resistance training Yao et al., J Neurophysiol. 83:441-52, 2000. 7. Enlargement of neuromuscular junction [“functional significance unknown”] 7 8. Reduction in GTO inhibition of muscle activation. Does not occur 8 “Neural adaptations to resistance training” for a healthy young male 100 % % of improvement is due to which factor 0% From: Physiology of Exercise and Sport, Wilmore & Costill, 1999 The understanding of the exact nature of neural adaptations to resistance training is still in it’s early stages 9 (2005), 13 (2005) 1- Aagaard P. Training-induced changes in neural function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003, Apr;31(2):61-7 2- Aagaard P, et al. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 2002 Oct;93(4):1318-263 3- Hakkinen K et al., Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people J Appl Physiol. 1998 Apr;84(4):1341-9 4- Duchateau et al. Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units. J Appl Physiol. 2006 Dec;101(6):1766-75. 5- Holtermann et al., Changes in agonist EMG activation level during MVC cannot explain early strength improvement. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005:94, 593-601 6- Gabriel DA, Kamen G, Frost G. Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: mechanisms and recommendations for training practices. Sports Med. 2006;36(2):133-49. 7- Gardiner et al., Effects of exercise training on alpha-motoneurons. J Appl Physiol. 2006, 101:1228-36 8- Chalmers, G. R. Do Golgi Tendon Organs Really Inhibit Muscle Activity at High Force Levels to Save Muscles From Injury, and Adapt with Strength Training? Sport Biomechanics, 1:239-249, 2002. 9- Griffin L, Cafarelli E. Resistance training: cortical, spinal, and motor unit adaptations. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005 Jun;30(3):32840. 10Kamen G, Knight CA. Training-related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Dec;59(12):1334-8 11Patten C, Kamen G, Rowland DM. Adaptations in maximal motor unit discharge rate to strength training in young and older adults. Muscle Nerve. 2001 Apr;24(4):542-50. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 30 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6a: Neuromuscular adaptations with resistance training 12Hakkinen K et al., Neuromuscular adaptation during prolonged strength training, detraining and re-strength-training in middle-aged and elderly people. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Sep;83(1):51-62. 13Holtermann et al. Changes in agonist EMG activation level during MVC cannot explain early strength improvement. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Aug;94(5-6):593-601. 14Carolan B, Cafarelli E. Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 1992 Sep;73(3):9117. 15Morse et al. Muscle strength, volume and activation following 12-month resistance training in 70-year-old males. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Oct;95(2-3):197-204. 16Beltman, J. G.; de Haan, A.; Haan, H.; Gerrits, H. L.; van Mechelen, W., and Sargeant, A. J. Metabolically assessed muscle fibre recruitment in brief isometric contractions at different intensities. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Aug; 92(4-5):485-92. Now can we generate answers for?: THE MECHANISMS FOR STRENGTH INCREASES THAT ARE GREATER THAN MUSCLE SIZE INCREASES WHY DOES AN UNTRAINED LIMB IMPROVE IN STRENGTH, WHEN CONTRALATERAL LIMB IS TRAINED? Study results: There was a very weak to moderate correlation between strength of isolated single muscle groups and functional performance (e.g., stair climbing, rising from a chair, balance, 6 min walk time). Question: Why is there little to no relationship between how strong individual muscle groups are, and functional performance, in the elderly? WHAT ALLOWS ANYONE WHO TRAINS TO PRODUCE MORE FORCE? Which of these adaptations play a dominant role in: women elderly (males & females) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 31 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training Part B: How should people weight strength resistance train? Retrieved 11/14/05 from: http://web.archive.org/web/20040118120739/www.coachesinfo.com/article/250/ Some Thoughts on Proper Terminology Harvey Newton - Newton Sports, Ormand Beach, Florida, USA … Let's start simply with the term resistance training. This is the most correct, all-inclusive term to describe the various methods of body weight or external resistance exercise for whatever athletic or cosmetic goal. In the U.S., nearly everyone refers his or her use of resistance training as strength training. Certainly one syllable is easier than three are and I suppose the shorter term implies a bit more importance. However, most of these individuals are far off target in terms of actually training for improved strength. True strength training requires the use of an appropriately high intensity and low repetitions to have a positive effect on one's strength. Simply stated, while, those who use moderate or light resistances and perform many repetitions are engaged in resistance training it is not typical strength training. Now, should they choose to use weights as their form of resistance, we can then use the term weight training to describe their efforts. But, for example, if they employ body weight, surgical tubing or water as resistance, then obviously resistance is not being created through the use of weights. This is not weight or typical strength training. … Why do people resistance train? Goal in resistance training….. To train the nervous system to maximize force production at a joint, it is not enough to just do activities which maximize muscle size, and activities which are task specific movements (to allow neural drive & multi joint coordination to develop), you must also do movements at the correct VELOCITY Review transfer in previously discussed: o Sale, 1988 o Knutzen et al., 2002 AN INCREASE IN STRENGTH DOES NOT TRANSFER TO ALL SPEEDS AT WHICH THE TRAINED MUSCLE MOVES Study: (In Behm & Sale 1993) subjects trained at 1.05, 3.14, 5.24 rad/sec, 8 weeks KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 32 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training slow speed training group showed greatest strength increases at slow speed test fast speed training group showed greatest strength increases at fast speed test middle speed training group showed similar strength increases at all speeds Study: from Sale (1988) MAX RFD = maximum rate of force development PF = peak force Comparison of “explosive” jump training (left column) and heavy resistance weight training (right column) on rate of rapid increase in force (top plots) and EMG (bottom plots) during maximal isometric contractions. Explosive training caused the greatest increase in rate of force development and more rapid EMG onset, while resistance training caused the greatest increase in peak force. THE PERSON WHO TRAINS AT A FAST SPEED, DEVELOPS THE ABILITY TO RAPIDLY PRODUCE ISOMETRIC FORCE, & MAXIMIZES STRENGTH GAINS AT FAST SPEEDS. Velocity specificity of weight training for kayak sprint performance. Liow DK, Hopkins WG. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jul;35(7):1232-7. PURPOSE: Athletes often use weight training to prepare for sprint events, but the effectiveness of different types of weight training for sprinting is unclear. We have therefore investigated the effect of slow and explosive weight training on kayak sprint performance. METHODS: Twenty-seven male and 11 female experienced sprint kayakers were randomized to slow weight training, KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 33 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training explosive weight training, or control (usual training) groups. Weight training consisted of two sessions per week for 6 wk; in each session the athletes performed 3-4 sets of two sport-specific exercises with a load of 80% 1repetition-maximum. The two training programs differed only in the time taken to complete the concentric phase of the exercises: slow, 1.7 s; explosive, <0.85 s. To determine the effects of training on sprint acceleration and speed maintenance, the athletes performed 15-m kayaking sprints pre- and posttraining; an electronic timing system provided sprint times at 3.75-, 7.5-, and 15-m marks. RESULTS: Relative to control, both types of weight training substantially improved strength and sprint performance. The improvements in mean sprint time over 15 m in each group were: slow, 3.4%; explosive, 2.3%; control, -0.2% (90% confidence limits for pairwise differences, approximately +/1.4%). Over the first 3.75 m, the improvements were: slow, 7.1%; explosive, 3.2%; control, 1.4% ( approximately +/-2.6%). Over the last 7.5 m, the improvements were: slow, 2.1%; explosive, 3.0%; control, -0.8% ( approximately +/-1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Slow weight training is likely to be more effective than explosive training for improving the acceleration phase of sprinting, when force is high throughout the length of the stroke. Explosive weight training may be more effective in speed maintenance, when forces are developed rapidly over a short period at the start of the stroke. What is the speed of performance of a javelin throw? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svZ7DPi7rLI SO.. What speed should you train at???? “Data… supports velocity specificity and demonstrate the importance of training at fast, moderate, and slow velocities to improve isokinetic force production across all testing velocities” Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):674-88. But: Velocity specificity of training may apply mainly to people who are trained, and not for untrained people Kraemer, WJ and RU Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 34 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training Kraemer, WJ and RU Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. Should we be training people for muscle strength or power? What researchers in the physical training of athletes and the elderly are saying: “In many sports activities, the ability to rapidly develop force is equally important or even more important than the maximal force itself”. Duchateau & Hainaut, Mechanism of muscle and motor unit adaptation to explosive power training. In: Strength and power in sport, 2nd ed. Paavo V. Komi (ed), Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2003, pp 315- 330. “… in virtually all situations in sports and in daily activities an efficient means of activating muscles quickly, or of producing high impulses within given time periods is much more desirable [than basic MVC strength]…” Albert Gollhofer, Proprioceptive Training: Considerations for Strength and Power Productions. In: Strength and power in sport, 2nd ed. Paavo V. Komi (ed), Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2003, pp 331-342. “In normal human movement the time taken to produce a certain submaximal force level may sometimes be as important as the absolute force level itself. Aging leads to declines in … maximal strength … but it has been shown to lead to even greater worsening in explosive force production.” “… modified power type of exercises could also be useful as a part of an overall physical training for older people”. K. Hakkinen, Ageing and neuromuscular adaptation to strength training. In: Strength and power in sport, 2nd ed. Paavo V. Komi (ed), Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2003, pp 409-425. “Muscle power recedes at a faster rate than strength with age and may also be a stronger predictor of fall risk and functional decline. The optimal training paradigm for improving muscle power in older adults is not known, although some literature suggests high velocity, low load training is optimal in young adults.” de Vos NJ et al., Optimal load for increasing muscle power during explosive resistance training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 May;60(5):638-47 KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 35 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training “Power production, and not just strength, may be the relevant contributor to performance in a functional task.” (pg 638) Effect of strength and power training on physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Miszko TA, Cress ME, Slade JM, Covey CJ, Agrawal SK, Doerr CE. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Feb;58(2):171-5. BACKGROUND: The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child. METHODS: The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age +/- SD = 72.5 +/- 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power. RESULTS: After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p =.033) and C (p =.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p =.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power. CONCLUSIONS: Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? Tschopp M, et al., A meta-analysis. Age Ageing (2011) doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr005 Objective: to determine the effects of power training with high movement velocity compared with conventional resistance training with low movement velocity for older community-dwelling people. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 36 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training Design: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Conclusion: power training is feasible for elderly persons and has a small advantage over strength training for functional outcomes. No firm conclusion can be made for safety. Should we be training people for muscle strength or power? Maximum power production involves speeds that are NOT slow Power = force * (distance / time) = force * velocity Bottinelli R. and Reggiani C. Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2000; 73(2-4):195262. Maximum, mechanical power is produced at a resistance of 30% of maximum isometric strength, which corresponds to a velocity of muscle shortening of approx. 30% of maximum Kraemer, WJ and RU Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. Training increases in power output are specific to the velocity of the training train slow against heavy resistances = maximum power improvement at slow speeds train with rapid movements at 30% of MVC, and power improvement is greatest at this speed. Kraemer, WJ and RU Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 37 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training If you need to pick one load to train at to maximize power adaptation: Training against a “30% resistance produced the greatest increase in force and power over the entire concentric velocity range”. “If the coach or athlete had to choose a single resistance, then the resistance that produces the greatest power output (30% of maximum voluntary contraction[MVC]) has been shown to be optimal. “.. it may be prudent to continuously adjust the resistance used in training to ensure increased power output at slow and fast movement speeds. Also, the presentation of a range of loads and resulting movment speeds may be more effective because of the changing stimulus of the neuromuscular system eliciting grater adaptations. This concept remains speculative, however, and should be investigated” Kraemer, WJ and RU Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. Thomas GA, Kramer, WJ et al., Maximal power at different percentages of one repetition maximum: influence of resistance and gender. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):336-42 “In order to optimize athletic performance, it is intuitive that athletes should train using loads that will maximize power output.” “30% of 1-RM was the standard resistance capable of being applied across exercises and genders. Therefore from an exercise prescription perspective, 30% of the 1-RM for such power exercises appears to be a good stimuli or resistance loading for enhancing maximal mechanical power development when using these exercises. If you need to pick one load to train at to maximize power adaptation: (“30% 1RM can’t be trained with IF USING TYPICAL RESISTANCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT”) Power Training for: % 1RM Reps Single event effort (e.g., throw) 80-90 1-2(fast) Multi-effort event (e.g., volleyball jumping) 75-85 3-5(fast) Strength >=85 <=6 Endurance <=67 >=12 Hypertrophy 67-85 6-12 Baechle & Earle Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, 3 rd Ed. 2008, pg 400-404 KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 38 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training Raoul F. Reiser et al., Between the Beginning and End of a Repetition: How Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Influence the Intensity of a Biceps Curl. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 29(5) (October 2007) 64-76 How to train at speeds that are not slow? “… performing traditional pressing movements rapidly with light loads does not create the ideal loading conditions … with regard to maximal power production.” Due to increased duration of the deceleration phase as the athlete must slow the bar to a complete stop at the end of the range. Kraemer, WJ and RU Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. “Ballistic” Resistance training = athlete throws or jumps with the weight “Being able to release the mass at the end of the range of motion is vital to promoting power and acceleration” KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 39 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training Sample Ballistic Training Methods Plyometrics Easy to Implement Medicine ball training Weighted jump squats, Pushups (weight needed?) Speed up typical exercises (e.g., up stairs, out of chair, do some typical machine or free lifts faster) Add chains or elastics to some free lifts & do them fast (e.g. Eric Tripp “dynamic” training = 50% 1RM+10% in chain weight, lift it fast, e.g., bench press, squat etc.) Lift & throw sandbags (weightlifting or other movements) Weightlifting movements (cleans, hang cleans from the knees)* Difficult to Implement Lift and throw and drop weigh into sand pit (e.,g weightlifting movements without the catch) Air resistance (e.g., Keiser brand) Computerized weight equipment that allows the release of the mass Kraemer & Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. *Hang clean: start standing with bar at waist, snach to shoulder/chin level support (power) clean: start with bar on ground, up to thigh, up to shoulder/ chin power snatch: ground to arms overhead But…. Previous strength training should be completed (i.e., able to squat 1.5x body weight) BEFORE initiating a gradual increase in ballistic resistance training, due to theorized protective role in terms of injury prevention. Kraemer & Newton. (2000). Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Amer. 11(2): 341-368. BUT See also:Ed McNeely, (2007) Introduction to Plyometrics: Converting Strength to Power, NSCA Performance Training Journal, 6(5), 19-22. “Having a good strength base is essential for performing plyometrics safely and effectively. Without good lower body and core strength, the amortization phase becomes too long and much of the benefit of the plyometric is lost. Over the years, the need to squat one to two times body weight has been suggested as a requirement for plyometrics. While this is a good guideline for some of the higher intensity drills, simple jumps in place and hops over very low barriers can be used with most athletes as long as they have demonstrated the ability to land properly.” See One Arm Throw video on KIN 410 web page Discuss Bilateral Deficit and unilateral training barbell vs 2 dumbbells vs one dumbbell Oilers training video KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 40 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6b: Resistance training = machine weights 12 12 = Traditional free lifts (Squat, bench press, barbell bicep curl) 2 2 Single plane of 3 major planes Not single plane of 3 major planes * Bilateral movement * 2 hands or feet NOT fixed together Single plane of 3 major planes Not single plane of 3 major planes * Bilateral movement * 2 hands or feet fixed together Highest degree of freedom * Unilateral hand or foot movement Not single plane of 3 major planes Increasing challenge and complexity for nervous system Increasingly realistic movement Single plane of 3 major planes lowest degree of freedom * Bilateral movement * 2 hands or feet fixed together * load & often body stabilized for you 4 19 8 3 17 11 Not used by Oilers Data for Oilers Exercise Video KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 41 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Part C: Views from many people on resistance training Source #1: Steven Plisk, Director of Sport Conditioning, Yale University. Plisk, S (2000) Resistance Training - Part I: Considerations in Maximizing Sport Performance. Retrieved December 22, 2000 from the International Society of Biomechanics in Sport - Coaches Information Service, Available: http://www.sportscoach-sci.com/ In general, structural movements (e.g. multi-joint, weight-bearing exercises) have a systemic effect which reaches far beyond the muscle fibers used in their execution. Muscles act - and must be targeted - in functional task groups rather than in isolation. This is one reason why athletes are well advised to emphasize powerlifting and weightlifting-style movements, and compound exercises in general, in their training. Furthermore, such movements are also a potent means by which the neuromuscular and neuroendocrine systems are activated, in turn up-regulating every system in the body. Thus, there are several reasons why strength training programs should be based on free-weight movements rather than isolated muscles: POWER The greater the effort - and acceleration - with a given weight, the greater the power development and subsequent training effect. Peak power output during weightlifting movements (snatch and clean & jerk) is the highest ever documented, and is comparable to the maximum theoretically possible for a human. For example, the explosive "jump and pull" or "dip and drive" actions of these movements are executed in 0.2 - 0.3sec; and peak power production is: • 4-5 times that of the deadlift or squat • 11-15 times that of the bench press MOTOR COORDINATION Skillful movements have a motor control / learning effect which carries over to the athlete's "coordinative abilities": • orientation • differentiation • reactive ability • rhythm • balance • combinatory ability • adaptive ability EXERCISE PRIORITIZATION In terms of specificity, training tasks should be selected and prioritized according to their dynamic correspondence with the demands of the activity (also referred KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 42 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training to as specificity or transfer of training effect): Their basic biomechanics - but not necessarily outward appearance - should be specific to those occurring in competition. The rate of force development and time of force production (impulse) and dynamics of effort (power) are especially important criteria in explosive athletic movements. Other practical considerations include amplitude and direction of movement, accentuated region of force application, and regime of muscular work. This concept is analogous to the motor learning principle of practice specificity with respect to sensorimotor, processing and contextual effects on acquisition, retention and transfer. While these may appear to be statements of common sense, it is difficult to overstate their importance because failure to address them in training can result in limited transfer to competitive performance. Source #2: Stone, M, Plisk, S. and Collins, D., Training Principles: Evaluation of Modes and Methods of Resistance Training - A Coaching Perspective, Sport Biomechanics, 1:79103, 2002. Source #3: Stone, M., Stone, M., Lamont, H. (2003) Explosive Exercise Retrieved December 16, 2003, from http://www.coachesinfo.com/article/242/ “Because of these alterations in activation patterns, selection of exercises for strength/power training should be viewed as movement specific rather than simply training a muscle(s). Improvement in the efficiency of intra and especially inter muscular activation implies an enhanced coordinative ability and is an important mechanism contributing to improved strength expression (Semmler and Enoka 2001).” Source #4: Mike Bahn, MS, CSCS, Arizona Diamondbacks. (2004) Personal Communication "Train movements, not muscles. And I agree that there is a place for isolation movements in early stages of rehab, but other than that, not much use from a practical KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 43 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training standpoint. Our programs don't even include isolation movements like bicep curls or tricep extensions, as those muscles are used quite a bit in more functional exercises (some guys do them at the end of our workouts for the "beach muscles", but that is their choice). Source #5: Pgs 29, 30, 42, 64. – published 2006 KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 44 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 45 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 46 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Source 5b: Vern Gambetta, Athletic Development: Art & Science of Functional Sports Conditioning, Human Kinetics, 2007 Isolation (pg 24): Machines (pg 25): Machine safety & body position (pg 193): Source #6: Functional-task exercise versus resistance strength exercise to improve daily function in older women: a randomized, controlled trial. de Vreede PL, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jan;53(1):2-10. Functional tasks exercise versus resistance exercise to improve daily function in older women: a feasibility study. de Vreede PL, et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):1952-61. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 47 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Objectives: To determine whether a functional-task exercise program and a resistance exercise program have different effects on the ability of communityliving older people to perform daily tasks. Design: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting: Community leisure center in Utrecht, the Netherlands. Participants: Ninety-eight healthy women aged 70 and older were randomly assigned to the functional-task exercise program (function group, n=33), a resistance exercise program (resistance group, n=34), or a control group (n=31). Participants attended exercise classes three times a week for 12 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Exercises were given 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. The functional tasks exercise program aimed to improve daily tasks in the domains first affected in older adults, whereas the resistance exercise program focused on strengthening the muscle groups that are important for functional performance. Measurements: Functional task performance (Assessment of Daily Activity Performance (ADAP)), isometric knee extensor strength (IKES), handgrip strength, isometric elbow flexor strength (IEFS), and leg extension power were measured at baseline, at the end of training (at 3 months), and 6 months after the end of training (at 9 months). Results: The ADAP total score of the function group (mean change 6.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=5.2-8.4) increased significantly more than that of the resistance group (3.2, 95% CI=1.3-5.0; P=.007) or the control group (0.3, 95% CI=-1.3-1.9; P<.001). Moreover, the ADAP total score of the resistance group did not change significantly compared with that of the control group. In contrast, IKES and IEFS increased significantly in the resistance group (12.5%, 95% CI=3.8-21.3 and 8.6%, 95% CI=3.1-14.1, respectively) compared with the function group (-2.1%, 95% CI=-5.4-1.3; P=.003 and 0.3%, 95% CI=-3.6-4.2; P=.03, respectively) and the control group (2.7%, 95% CI=-8.6-3.2, P=.003 and 0.6%, 95% CI=-3.4-4.6; P=.04, respectively). Six months after the end of training, the increase in ADAP scores was sustained in the function group (P=.002). Conclusion: Functional-task exercises are more effective than resistance exercises at improving functional task performance in healthy elderly women and may have an important role in helping them maintain an independent lifestyle. The functional exercise tasks used follow… (NOT “intimidating” free weights) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 48 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 49 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Source #7: Fri May 20, 2005 Gym Ditches High-Tech for Basic Workouts By MARK JOHNSON At this gym, there are no Cybex, Universal or Nautilus machines. …. Jeff Taylor, 11, of Clifton Park, N.Y., drags tugboat chains as part of his workout at Cutting Edge Sport Sciences in Albany, N.Y. Monday, May 9, 2005. Against the wall are concrete stones used for weight lifting. (AP Photo/Tim Roske) Instead of trendy elliptical trainers, there's a 117-pound cement ball to lift. In place of indoor rowers, there are 68-pound tug boat chains to drag across the floor. And instead of Stairmasters, there's a 200-pound truck tire to lift and push. "We're pretty anti-machine here," said Naughton, 41. Clients go through a series of basic, "multi-joint" exercises aimed at strengthening the entire body, not just a single muscle group. … We're talking about functional strength. Source #8: Accomodating Resistance. Joseph M. Warpeha, MA, CSCS, NSCA-CPT NSCA's Performance Training Journal | www.nsca-lift.org/perform Vol. 4 No. 2 | Page 22-23 We are all aware of the benefits that resistance training offers in terms of strength. If you have ever attempted a maximal lift, you are also aware that a "weakest point" exists in any range of motion that ultimately will limit your ability to complete the lift if the weight is heavy enough. Traditional free weights offer one set resistance through any given range of motion. Due to joint angles, biomechanics, and the involved musculature, the body has different strength capabilities at different positions throughout a lift. For example, most people can "lock out" the final few inches of a bench press with a weight substantially greater than that which they can fully press. The idea of accommodating resistance is based around the need to "accommodate" the strong and weak points of any given motion by using such tools such as elastic bands or chains that alter the resistance throughout the movement. Let's take the squat for example. The weakest point is generally somewhere in the bottom half. We must recall at this time that power is a function of mass moved per unit of time The greatest power athletes typically spend a good deal of time training with loads of 40 70% of a 1-repetition maximum and concentrate on moving the weight as fast as possible, thus increasing the rate of force development and producing the greatest power. If your best squat is 300 pounds, training with 270 for singles, doubles, or triples all of the time probably would not be optimal (if you have not been supplementing your routine with power/speed training) since that weight KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 50 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training will not be moved with a lot of speed and your sticking point will come into play more times than not because you were not able to produce enough momentum to push through it. Perhaps you would be better off reducing the load on the bar and incorporating accommodating resistance . This can be accomplished by attaching a large rubber band around each end of the bar (2 bands total) with the other ends of the bands fixed to the ground directly beneath the bar's vertical plane of movement. Let's say at the bottom of the squat the bands are totally relaxed but at the top they add 100 pounds of extra resistance due to the elastic energy exerted by the bands. Now put 200 pounds on the bar with these bands. At the bottom, you are essentially dealing with 200 pounds (which a 300-lb squatter should be able to accelerate quite rapidly). As you ascend, the resistance gets greater and greater up to 300 pounds at the very top (200 lbs + 100 lbs), but you are able to keep accelerating the bar because of the momentum you were able to produce at the beginning of the concentric phase due to the light load. Additionally, in general, most people are stronger at the end of extension-type movements due to more favorable biomechanical position (leverage) so the bands in this case accommodate the increased strength potential near the completion of the movement If you move the 200-lb bar fast enough, you are producing far greater power (even at the bottom where you are truly only moving 200 pounds) than you were with 270 pounds on the slower moving bar. Chains hung from a bar have a similar effect to that of bands and both serve the purpose of training the neuromuscular system to recruit more motor units, thus increasing the rate of force development. According to Cal Dietz, Head Olympic Strength Coach at the University of Minnesota, "More and more of my athletes are seeing maximal weights increase as well as enhanced performance on the field because they incorporated workouts into their program where they reduced the weight on the bar and concentrated on speed and accommodating their strength curves. It might not seem obvious right away that using lighter weights will make you more powerful. However, if speed/power training is performed properly, the heavier weights will become easier because now you have taught your body how to fire a greater number of muscle fibers and to increase the rate of force development. These things are much more easily accomplished with lighter loads and greater speeds. Note: Only elastic bands that are specifically designed for strength training or powerlifting should be used (Jump Stretch, Flex Bands ® , etc.) as other types of rubber bands are not made to handle high tension loads and pose a serious risk of injury or bodily harm if the bands break. Source #9: Functional vs. strength training in disabled elderly outpatients. Krebs DE, Scarborough DM, McGibbon CA. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;86(2):93-103. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-intensity functional training (FT) or strength training (ST) better enables impairment, disability, and functional gains among disabled community-dwelling elders. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 51 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial in a large, tertiary care outpatient rehabilitation department. Fifteen elders (62-85 yrs old) referred for physical therapy with one or more impairments, including lower-limb arthritis, participated in 6 wks of FT (weekly outpatient and three to five times per week of home practice in rapid and correct execution of locomotor activities of daily living, including gait, stepping, and sit to stand) or progressive resistive ST using elastic bands with intensity, therapist contact, and home practice similar to those of FT. RESULTS: Both groups significantly improved their combined lower-extremity strength (hip abduction, ankle dorsiflexion, knee flexion, ankle plantarflexion, and knee extension) (P = 0.003), but no statistical difference between the ST and FT group gains (P = 0.203) was found. Subjects in both interventions improved their gait speed, but the FT group improved more than the ST group (P = 0.001). During chair rise, the FT group improved their maximum knee torque more than the ST group (P = 0.033), indicating that they employed a more controlled and efficient movement strategy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that an intensive FT intervention results in strength improvements of comparable magnitude as those attained from ST and that FT also confers greater improvements in dynamic balance control and coordination while performing daily life tasks. The functional exercise tasks used follow… (NOT “intimidating” free weights) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 52 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Source #10: Ultimate Regimen Lisa Altobelli, Sports Illustrated. New York: Apr 9, 2007. Vol. 106, Iss. 15; pg. 28 Hackleman, a 10th-degree black belt and former Army boxing champion, leads Liddell through twice-daily workouts with 14 other mixed-martial-arts fighters. "A lot of guys don't last because they hate these medieval workouts," says Hackleman, 47. "But there is no New Age exercise or machine that's better for you than pushing a wheelbarrow up a hill." Source #11: “The first radio podcast where experts explore the science and real-world application of strength & conditioning.” CO-HOST, WILLIAM J. KRAEMER, PH.D. Dr. William J. Kraemer is a professor in the Department of Kinesiology at the University of Connecticut…(see web site below for description of his accomplishments) http://www.sphour.com OR Search “strength power hour” in podcasts at iTunes SHOW DATE: 7/2/07 Dr. Kramer speaks on Fixed versus Free Weights: Show date: 5/29/07 JERRY MARTIN, CSCS*D, UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT Mr. Martin, then Dr. Kramer speak on Power, & No deceleration when training: Show date: 6/18/07 GUEST INTERVIEWS WITH MIKE CLARK (SEATTLE SEAHAWKS) Mike Clark speaks on Advice for coaches - To train for activities on your feet, train on your feet, not laying down: Show release date: 2/18/08 Interviews with Juan Carlos Santana & Bill Kraemer. Stability versus balance training, and muscle activation levels: KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 53 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Source #12: Keith C Spennewyn Strength Outcomes in Fixed Versus Free-Form Resistance Equipment. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 22(1):75-81, January 2008 The purpose of this study was to compare measures of strength and balance between subjects using fixed form or freeform resistance training equipment to determine whether there is a difference in strength or balance outcomes. FX group increased strength 57% from baseline while the FF group increased strength 115% from baseline. Balance improved 49% in the FX versus 245% in the FF groups. Results of this study indicate a greater improvement in FF over FX in strength (58%), and balance (196%). Source #13: http://www.sphour.com. Show Release Date: 4/28/08 Dr. Kramer speaks on Machine versus free weights for older adults Source #14: Lorne Goldenberg, owner of The Athletic Conditioning Center, Ottawa, Canada www.ACCOttawa.com Source: StrengthCoach.com episode #15 Topics: The body functions as a unit Feet must be in contact with the ground Big shiny machines do not correlate with function and how the body works Topic: The bench press KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 54 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Source #15: NSCA Tactical Strength and Conditioning Report, April 2009. Source #16: Erik Helland is Head Strength & Conditioning Coach in his 22nd season with the Bulls. Source: StrengthCoach.com 0906-28 episode Topics: Symmetrical lifts & functional training “Functional training”, train on your feet, no machines. Discuss: 1. Why are some exercise facilities still using isolating machines? 2. Examples of exercise facilities moving beyond isolating machines. Discuss: Summary of training principles: What does good training involve? KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 55 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training Top Ten Training Tips for (Athletic) Conditioning Success Retrieved 6/3/09 from: http://www.thestretchinghandbook.com/archives/athleticconditioning.php, Underlined sections identified by Dr. Chalmers The IRON-ic rule of strength training for sport: The objective is not to get stronger per se but to improve athletic performance to build better athletes. If your sport is power lifting, then that means improving your total. If your sport is mixed martial arts, that means you must improve your ability in the ring. It's important for the coach and the trainee to focus on improving sports performance. I've seen several football teams over the years that have the 405 Bench Press Club featured on the wall but are 0-20 for the season! Here are my top ten tips to ensure athletic success. 1. Bodyweight before external resistance Since when has the term strength and conditioning coach been confused with weight room coach? I don't know but I'm still surprised at the eagerness of most coaches to get their athletes under the bar. Many coaches and athletes make the mistake of beginning a strength routine and going straight for the heavy weights. This usually ends up causing an injury. An athlete has no business using load if he/she cannot stabilize, control and move efficiently with only their bodyweight. If you can't stabilize your shoulder girdle and core doing push-ups then there is no way I'm going to put you under a bench press bar. Can you sit in a full squat? What about a full range single leg bodyweight squat? Until you have mastered these exercises you can forget doing dynamic effort work with a box squat. So your strength program in the beginning stages may actually include no weights whatsoever. And it will work better and faster than a typical program that relies primarily on weights and machines in the beginning stages. In fact in my experience I'd suggest that some athletes cannot even work with their bodyweight so we may need to modify certain exercises. Do not rush to lift heavy loads; muscle recruitment and control are far more important than maximal strength for any athlete. Without control the strength is useless. 2. Train to the 5th Power I. Train in a standing position - GROUND BASED. The majority of athletic training should take place ON YOUR FEET (standing) as the majority of sport takes place in that position. Of course there are exceptions to this rule, but in general, we always lose something when we go from a standing position to a seated or lying position. II. Train with free weights. I almost feel stupid bringing this up. But I still see programs out there that include leg extensions and leg curls. Any machine limits the range of motion and controls the KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 56 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training movement. This is fine for beginners, but athletes need to be able to stabilize and control their bodies in all three planes of motion simultaneously. III. Use Multiple Joints Single joint strength (e.g. leg extension machine, bicep curls) develops useless strength. A study was undertaken at Ohio State involving a knee extension test. The participants included: 3 World ranked squatters and 1 World Record holder in the squat. The test results of the above subjects averaged 180lbs of force on the Cybex leg extension machine. However a local power lifter (ranked 15th in the state) broke the machine. He wasn't even number one in his state but he was stronger on this machine than the World ranked lifters. If there is a better example of the inability of single joint machine training to translate to real world strength then I'd like to see it. A guy who was only ranked 15th in the state can apply more single leg strength than a World Record holder. Nice; pretty; but pretty useless. If that strength doesn't transfer to athletic success then what's the point of having it? Basically, despite the strength that individual exhibited on the machine, he was unable to apply it in a real world situation like squatting. And the elite squatters weren't that strong on the leg extension showing it's not even a factor. So leg extension machines are a waste of time. Unless of course you compete in seated ass kicking leg extension contests. "How can anyone expect to possess co-ordination in active work when his muscles have never worked together in groups?" Earle Liederman, 1924. Nearly 80 years ago and we are still having this argument today. Isolation machines have no place in the preparation of a competitive athlete. IV. Train with explosiveness. Explosiveness, as I see it, can be defined as; "as fast as possible with control." Some people seem to feel that explosiveness is somewhat dangerous. Sloppy training; uncontrolled movements? Now that's dangerous. Training explosively more closely mirrors what happens in sport and/or life. V. Train movements not muscle groups. Again, isolated muscle group training, outside of rehabilitation has no place in athletic training. An athlete should focus on strengthening specific movements. True muscle isolation is impossible anyway, so let's focus on using that body to work in an integrated fashion. 3. Train unilaterally and multi-planar The majority of strength training programs take place in the sagittal plane with bilateral movements. However the majority of sport takes place in all 3 planes simultaneously with primarily unilateral movements. EVERY single sports conditioning program should include split squats, step ups and lunge variations. 85% of the gait cycle (walking, running) is spent on one leg. Over 70% of the muscles of the core run in a rotational plane. Does your training program reflect that? 4. Use all primary methods to develop strength This should be of no surprise to readers of this website so I won't spend a whole lot of KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 57 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training time on this. Suffice to say you need to focus on all three. Max Strength method heavy loads Repeated Efforts Method - multiple sets and reps Dynamic Effort Method using relatively lighter weights and moving them at max speed (this is STILL the least used method in most strength coaching programs). Traditional strength training programs have focused overwhelmingly on max strength or force development. More important for the competitive athlete is a focus on RATE OF force development. In the world of sport speed is still the king. 5. Variation Everybody seems to understand that training load should be progressively increased. Few understand that the training stimulus must also be progressively and periodically varied. All programs have positive and negative aspects no matter how well designed or specific - too much time on one program and you'll habituate to the positive aspects and accumulate the negative aspects. Even the most perfectly balanced program has to have one exercise performed first and another performed last. Not being aware of the potential negatives of this (i.e. one exercise is never trained when you are fresh) can create an injury situation. 6. Avoid mimicking skills This is a big one. Throwing weighted baseballs etc will do little to improve your strength and a lot to screw up your technique. Make sure the roles of strength and conditioning and skill training are separate. I HATE the term sport specific. I much prefer NON-specific training. If I'm working with a freestyle swimmer, sport specificity means that I'll do a ton of loaded internal rotation work. My approach? To do no internal rotation work. In fact I'd spend most of our conditioning time on EXTERNAL rotation as an injury prevention mechanism. The role of conditioning training is NOT skill training. Loading a technique tends to affect the mechanics of the technique negatively. 7. Train with Balance Make sure you address pushing and pulling on both horizontal and vertical planes and attempt to balance the loading. If you are bench pressing 400lbs but can only do a chest supported row with 50lbs your shoulder girdle is going to suffer. If you can't handle the same loads for two opposing movements then increase the volume of the weaker movement (e.g. by doing an extra exercise or an extra set or two) to compensate. Trust me this might not seem that important now but I'm not just interested in athletic performance, I'm interested in the long term health of my athletes. 8. Get out of the Weight Room Try some strongman training: sled dragging; uphill sprints; or stadium stairs. I'm sick of hearing coaches telling me that they think outside of the box, yet they never leave the confines of their own little box - the weight room. 9. Train the antagonists This ties in with the swimming example above. The speed of a throw or a kick or punch is determined largely by the ability of the antagonist to eccentrically decelerate the joint action efficiently and prevent joint injury. If your body cannot safely and effectively brake the motion, then it will not allow you to achieve full acceleration. If you are not training KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 58 updated 6/21/12 Section 3: Motor control aspects of resistance training Unit 6c: Expert views on resistance training the antagonists eccentrically - you are not training deceleration. And if you are not training deceleration you cannot be training acceleration. 10. Full Front Squats This exercise may be the single most athletic exercise. You'll get core strength, wrist, knee, hip, shoulder, and ankle flexibility in a single exercise. Ok- as usual I can't shut up so I'll add one more. 10.5 Extension! I'm not going to get into an article on the pros and cons of Olympic lifting, suffice to say that explosive triple extension (ankle, knee and hip) is a valuable component when training athletes. Remember though - we are training ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE. We are not training weightlifters. It is not necessary to do the complete lifts; the power and hang variations are fine. If you're not comfortable with the Olympic lifts then add jump training or medicine ball overhead throws or at the very least deadlifts (double extension) as a core lift. Do not get caught up in the numbers game and do not confuse gym improvements with real world or sports world improvements. The greatest athletes in the world do not necessarily have the greatest bench presses in the world. The greatest athletes in the world have an ability to produce useable force on their field of play. Usable force is force that propels athletes towards the ball, knocks another athlete back or down, helps you move at full speed, or throws the winning touchdown pass. Usable force is force properly directed in an unstable real world, unpredictable environment. The weight room, in general, is a stable environment whereas a field of play or the competition ring is a constantly changing place. A good strength and conditioning coach looks to improve athletic performances, not just gym lift numbers. *********************************************** About the author: For the past sixteen years Alwyn Cosgrove has been committed to achieving excellence in the field of fitness training and athletic preparation. Specializing in performance enhancement, Alwyn has helped countless individuals and athletes reach their goals through sound scientific training. Alwyn is also recognized and certified by the National Academy of Sports Medicine, the American College of Sports Medicine, the British Association of Sports And Exercise Sciences, Kingsports International Australia, the Society for Weight Training Injury Specialists, USA Weightlifting and the Chek Insitute of Corrective High Performance Exercise Kinesiology. Visit Alwyns site at... http://www.alwyngosgrove.com *********************************************** KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 59 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 7: Additional effects of afferent signals The SSC and fatigue If you maximally jump up & down 20X, why do you progressively jump lower? What is the physiological basis of the muscle fatigue? Review: The combined contribution of decending voluntary drive and reflex activation of motoneurons Exhaustive SSC fatigue (e.g., 100 jumps) can dramatically reduce the reflex contribution to force production through deterioration in the sensitivity of the reflex after fatigue because of decreased pH: direct inhibition of muscle spindle firing activating other chemical sensitive afferent nerve endings, to act through inhibitory interneuron, to inhibit homonymous motoneuron INHIBITORY (-) = DECREASE THE PROBABILITY THAT THE POSTSYNAPTIC CELL WILL FIRE AN ACTION POTENTIAL hyperpolarize the cell away from threshold for firing an AP threshold + + + + + + - Muscle fiber contractile activity inhibition What is the physiological basis of a reduction in force production with repeated SSC movements (e.g., jumping, hitting etc.)? KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 60 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 7: Additional effects of afferent signals Where are GOLGI TENDON ORGANS? What do GOLGI TENDON ORGANS detect? Type Ib afferent carries information from tendon organ What happens when Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) are firing action potentials? OR “What is the GTO reflex?” 1. GTOs serve as "safety devices" that help prevent excessive force during muscle contraction 2. Inhibitory influences of the GTO could be gradually reduced in response to strength training (Exercise Physiology, Powers & Howley, 4th ed, 2001) Similar statements in: Exercise Physiology, Brooks, Fahey, White & Baldwin, 3rd ed, 2000 Biomechanics, Kreighbaum & Barthels, 4th ed, 1996 Fleck and Kraemer, Designing resistance training programs, 1997 Baechle & Earle (eds), Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, 2 nd ed, 2000 What do GTOs really do when they are activated by muscle tension? From neurophysiology research articles 1) GTOs do not always inhibit the homonymous muscle. Ib afferents rarely inhibit ankle flexor motor neurons and inhibit only some extensor motor neurons (Eccles et al., J Physiol, 138:227,1957) 2) GTOs can excite the homonymous and heteronymous muscles Sample experimental results: “during walking Ib activity(force feedback) of (ankle) extensors can reinforce the ongoing extensor activity and prevent initiation of flexor activity.” (1,7,8,9) WHILE WALKING: in stance phase of locomotion when ankle extensor contracts, Ib firing excite extensors and inhibit flexors of leg to help hold you up (3,6,7), contributing up to 50% of the ankle extensor force (5) A system of positive force feedback across joints is enabled during locomotion (2) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 61 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 7: Additional effects of afferent signals WHILE STANDING: When an extensor muscle contracts, Ib afferents from GTOs in contracting muscle excite homonymous and other (heteronymous) leg extensors (4,7) “reinforcing force feedback is not a constant feature but is task dependent. It appears only in situation where it is appropriate, such as gait. In other conditions such as in the immobile resting animal, such pathways are closed…“(1) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Duysens et al. Load Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture, Physiological Reviews, 2000 Nichols et al., Rapid Spinal Mechanisms of Motor Control, Exercise & Sport Sci. Reviews, 1999. Pearson et al, Exp Brain Res, 90:557, 1992 Pratt, J Neurophysiol, 1995 73: 2578 Donelan JM, Pearson KG. Contribution of force feedback to ankle extensor activity in decerebrate walking cats. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;92(4):2093-104. 6. Grey MJ, Nielsen JB, Mazzaro N, Sinkjaer T. Positive force feedback in human walking. J Physiol. 2007 May 15;581(Pt 1):99105. 7. Windhorst U. Muscle proprioceptive feedback and spinal networks. Brain Res Bull. 2007, 73(4-6):155-202 8. Richard af Klint, et al., Load rather than length sensitive feedback contribute to soleus muscle activity during human treadmill walking. J Neurophysiol. 17 March 2010, 10.1152/jn.00547.2009 9. af Klint R, Cronin NJ, Ishikawa M, Sinkjaer T, Grey MJ. Afferent contribution to locomotor muscle activity during unconstrained overground human walking: an analysis of triceps surae muscle fascicles. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Mar;103(3):1262-74. Epub 2009 Dec 23 See also: Do Golgi Tendon Organs Really Inhibit Muscle Activity at High Force Levels to Save Muscles From Injury, and Adapt with Strength Training? By: G. Chalmers, Sport Biomechanics, 1:239-249, 2002 Bottom line: Research evidence indicates when a GTO Ib fires due to muscle tension: May act on other muscles - not just on homonymous muscle May excite, or inhibit, the target muscles, depending on the motor task This proprioceptive reflex facilitates movement (it is not “protective”) Do GTOs adapt with strength training to allow you to produce higher forces? b) The concept that GTO inhibit tension production is flawed (see: above) c) There is no evidence that GTO reflex function adapts with resistance training. (See: Do Golgi Tendon Organs Really Inhibit Muscle Activity at High Force Levels to Save Muscles From Injury, and Adapt with Strength Training? By: G. Chalmers, Sport Biomechanics, 1:239-249, 2002) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 62 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 8: Higher centers for motor control STEP 1: STRATEGIES FOR THE UPCOMING MOVEMENT MUST BE DEVISED STEP 2: TACTICS FOR THE UPCOMING MOVEMENT MUST BE DECIDED UPON STEP 3: EXECUTION OF THE MOVEMENT LEVEL High Middle Low FUNCTION Goal & strategy of movement (what to do) Tactics of movement sequence of muscle contractions to produce movement (how to do it) Execution of movement activation of specific muscles (do it) STRUCTURE Association areas of cortex (prefrontal & posterior parietal), basal ganglia Motor Cortex & cerebellum Spinal cord & brain stem see fig. 7.22 pg 339 Brain stem is at top of spinal cord. Cerebellum is posterior to brain stem. Cerebral cortex is above brain stem. see fig 7.18 pg 334 directly anterior to central sulcus (central lateral groove) is PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX anterior is the SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA (SMA) (top) and the PREMOTOR CORTEX (below the SMA) Primary Motor Cortex + Supplementary Motor Area + Premotor Cortex = MOTOR CORTEX further in front is PREFRONTAL CORTEX behind the central sulcus is PRIMARY SENSORY CORTEX behind that (up high) is the POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 63 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 8: Higher centers for motor control THE POSTERIOR PARIETAL AND PREFRONTAL CORTEX TAKE THE FIRST STEP IN PLANNING A MOVEMENT = step 1 strategies You (the pitcher) need information about your body position and the position of things around you to plan a movement. The posterior parietal cortex receives sensory information (from sensory cortex) and visual information The prefrontal cortex in humans is thought to be important for abstract thought, decision making, anticipation of consequences. THESE TWO AREAS, TOGETHER, FORM THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF DECISION MAKING FOR A MOVEMENT “WHAT SHOULD I DO, WHAT IS LIKELY TO HAPPEN” The posterior parietal cortex & the prefrontal cortex are extensively interconnected by neurons, so they can communicate with each other NEXT: WHERE IS THE MOVEMENT DECISION SENT? posterior parietal and prefrontal cortex send the decision to supplemental motor area (SMA) and premotor cortex KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 64 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 8: Higher centers for motor control SMA & PRE-MOTOR AREA START THE JOB OF PLANNING HOW TO DO THE MOVEMENT DECIDED UPON = step 2 tactics e.g., a subject decides direction to move the hand, but must wait for a command to move. if the subject is to pitch overhand, one group of neurons in SMA fire, until the command to go but if the subject is to pitch underhand, another group of neurons in SMA fire, until the command to go NEURONS IN SMA FIRE FROM WHEN YOU FINISH YOUR DECISION MAKING TO WHEN YOU START THE MOVEMENT I.E., THEY ARE HOLD THE INSTRUCTION OF WHAT TO DO, UNTIL IT IS TIME TO DO IT. THE BASAL GANGLIA IS ALSO INVOLVED IN SELECTING AND INITIATING MOVEMENTS (telling SMA what to do and when to start movement) KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 65 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 8: Higher centers for motor control Parkinson’s disease (1% of people over age 50) is due to a loss of neurons in the basal ganglia result is difficulty in initiating movements, slowness of movement, increased muscle tone because the SMA is not activated by the basal ganglia MOVEMENT “TACTICS” ARE RELEASED FROM SMA & PRE-MOTOR CORTEX BY “GO” SIGNAL, TO ACTIVATE BODY SPECIFIC NEURONS IN PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX = step 3 THE PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX NEURONS FORM A MAP OF THE BODY (SOMATOTOPIC MAP) see fig 7.18 pg 334 see fig 7.19 pg 335 KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 66 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 8: Higher centers for motor control THE ROLE OF THE PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX CELLS CAN CHANGE: if stroke kills the primary motor cortex cells which control the hand muscles, other neighboring cells can slowly take over control of the hand if you practice find hand movements, the hand area of the primary cortex enlarges for even more precise control. PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX ACTIVATES SPINAL CORD MOTOR NEURON POOLS, to activate muscles THE CEREBELLUM IS ALSO CRITICAL FOR DETERMINING THE DETAILED SEQUENCE OF MUSCLE CONTRACTION before & during the movement KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 67 updated 6/21/12 Section 4: Movement Control Systems Unit 8: Higher centers for motor control To help PLAN movement cerebellum: receives movement idea (from posterior parietal & prefrontal) and tactics (from primary motor cortex) sends contribution of muscle coordination to primary motor cortex Characteristic of person early in learning stages with respect to coordination of muscles? Characteristic of person with well learned skill with respect to coordination of muscles? To help DURING movement cerebellum: compares desired planed movement to ACTUAL sensory feedback if desired and actual movement don’t match, then correction is made CEREBELLUM IS AN IMPORTANT SITE WHERE MOTOR LEARNING OCCURS FOLLOWING CEREBELLUM DAMAGE: • the joints move independently (first shoulder, then elbow, then wrist) instead of coordinated simultaneous movement of joints • movement will fall short, or go past, the intended target position ALCOHOL produces similar effects by inhibiting cerebellar neurons THE CATCHER SIGNALS THE PITCHER FOR A FAST BALL DESCRIBE THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS THAT FOLLOW TO RESULT IN THE PITCH. KIN 507 Lecture notes 2012, Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D. Pg. 68 updated 6/21/12