SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON SELECT CLINICAL TEACHING METHODS Research and Development in Medical Education: Faculty Development Key Educational Skills Workshop: Clinical Teaching ONE MINUTE PRECEPTOR Summary of Research Preceptors using One Minute Preceptor (OMP) compared to non-OMP preceptors: o Are equally or better able to diagnose patient o Are better able to gauge the learner’s knowledge o Are more confident in their ability to diagnose o Rate the OMP teaching encounter as more effective & time efficient o Are more likely to teach about illness focusing on a broader DDX, diagnostic tests, and the natural presentation of disease. Preceptors show improved feedback after OMP workshop Students and residents rate OMP trained residents higher on getting a commitment, feedback, motivating learners but not higher on overall teaching effectiveness Students prefer the OMP and learning about natural presentation of disease References Aagaard EA, Teherani A, Irby DM. 2004. The effectiveness of the one minute preceptor model for diagnosing the patient and the learner. Acad Med 79:42–49. EckstromE, Homer L, Bowen J.Measuring outcomes of a one-minute preceptor faculty development workshop. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:410-4. Furney S, Orsini A, Orsetti K, Stern D, Gruppen L, Irby DM. 2001. Teaching the one-minute preceptor: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Int Med 16:620–624. Irby DM, Aagaard EA, Teherani A. 2004. Teaching points identified by preceptors observing one minute preceptor and traditional preceptor encounters. Acad Med 79:50–55. Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. 1992. A five-step ‘microskills’ model of clinical teaching. J Am Board of Family Practice 5:419–424. Salerno SM, O’Malley PG, Pangaro LN, Wheeler GA, Moores LK, Jackson JL. 2002. Faculty development seminars based on the one minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting. J Gene Intern Med 17:779–787. Teherani A, O’Sullivan P, Aagaard EA, Morrison EH, Irby DM.2007. Student perceptions of the One-Minute Preceptor and Traditional Preceptor Models. Med Teach: 29: 323-7. SNAPPS Summary of Research SNAPPS learner-centered technique for case presentations: o Facilitates Students’ expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and case-based uncertainties o Does not extend the usual length of the student case presentations. o Helps students summarize patient findings concisely and thoroughly SNAPPS-trained students are more likely that non-SNAPPS trained students to: o Express uncertainties and obtain clarification on cases seen. o Present a limited differential diagnosis (on average, two hypotheses). o Reason out loud, justifying their diagnostic hypotheses. o Initiate patient management discussions. 1 Teherani o Discussions about case-related readings occurred only with SNAPPS students References Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. 2003. SNAPPS: a learner-centered model for outpatient education. Acad Med 78:893–8. Wolpaw TM, Papp KK, Bordage G. 2010. Using SNAPPS to Facilitate the Expression of Clinical Reasoning and Uncertainties: A Randomized Comparison Group Trial. Acad Med 84: 517-24. EIGHT STEP PRECEPTOR (ESP) Summary of Research Number of steps preclude faculty from using it fully Faculty using more ESP behaviors receive better ratings of teaching effectiveness More use of ESP behaviors does not significantly increase duration of precepting sessions References Ottolini MC Ozah PO, Mirza N, Greenberg LW. 2010. Student Perceptions of Effectiveness of the Eight Step Preceptor (ESP) Model in the Ambulatory Setting. Teach Learn Med 22; 97-101. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES FOR RESEARCH ON CLINICAL TEACHING Time Effective Strategies for Teaching Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Teaching when time is limited. BMJ. 2008;336:384–7. Other Irby D. Teaching and learning in the ambulatory care setting: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70:898-931. O’Malley PG, Kroenke K, Ritter J, Dy N, Pangaro L. 1999. What learners and teachers value most in ambulatory educational encounters: a prospective, qualitative study. Acad Med 74:186–191. 2 Teherani