Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series n. 118, 1967
White, Alan R. “Mentioning the unmentionable”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series n. 118, 1967,
p. 113-118.
Wheatley, Jon. “Entrenchment and engagement”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series n. 118, 1967,
p. 119-127.
Slote, Michael Anthony. “Some thoughts on Goodman’s riddle”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series
n. 118, 1967, p. 128-132.
Fitzgerald, P. J. “Acting and refraining”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series n. 118, 1967, p. 133139.
Radford, Colin. “Knowing but not believing”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series n. 118, 1967, p.
139-140.
Taylor, Charles. “Teleological explanation-a reply to Denis Noble”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New
Series n. 118, 1967, p. 141-143.
Harris, Roy. “The semantics of self-description”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 4, New Series n. 118, 1967,
p. 144.
Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119, 1967
Gombay, André. “What is imperative inference?” Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119, 1967,
p. 145-152.
Cooper, Neil. “Scale-words”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119, 1967, p. 153-159.
Dennis, Maurice. “The beneficial and the harmful”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119,
1967, p. 159-162.
Jaeger, Ronald. “Describing acts owing to ignorance”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119,
1967, p. 163-167.
Sayward, Charles and Durrant, Michael. “Austin on whether every proposition has a
contradictory”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119, 1967, p. 167-170.
Swanson, J. W. “Denial in first order logic”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series n. 119, 1967, p.
171-173.
Vesey, G. N. A. “Margolis on the location of bodily sensations”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 5, New Series
n. 119, 1967, p. 174-176.
Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120, 1967
Cargile, James. “On believing you believe”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120, 1967, p.
177-183.
Deutscher, Max. “Bonney on saying and disbelieving”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120,
1967, p. 184-185.
Harris, N. G. E. “Geach and Frege’s assertion sing”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120,
1967, p. 186-189.
Leavitt, Frank J. “Telling and giving”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120, 1967, p. 190.
Aune, Bruce. “Hypotheticals and “can”: another look”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120,
1967, p. 191-195.
Thalberg, Irving. “Do we cause our own actions?” Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120, 1967,
p. 196-201.
Sanford, David. “Negative Terms”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120, 1967, p. 201-205.
Schlesinger, G. “Elimination of self-reference”. Analysis, v. 27, n. 6, New Series n. 120, 1967, p.
206-208.
Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n. 121, 1967
Ziff, Paul. “On H. P. Grice’s account of meaning”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n. 121, 1967,
p. 1-8.
Hollis, Martin. “Runciman’s misdescriptions”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n. 121, 1967, p.
8-10.
Mounce, H. O. “Virtue and the understanding”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n. 121, 1967, p.
11-17.
Phillips, D. Z. and Price, H. S. “Remorse without repudiation”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series
n. 121, 1967, p. 18-20.
McPherson, Thomas. “Punishment: definition and justification”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series
n. 121, 1967, p. 21-27.
Schiller, Marvin. “Complaints about ‘Entitled to complain’ ”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n.
121, 1967, p. 27-29.
Bennett, Jonathan. “Acting and refraining”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n. 121, 1967, p. 3031.
Nell, Edward J. “Semantics and self-description”. 3 Analysis, v. 28, n. 1, New Series n. 121,
1967, p. 32.
Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122, 1967
Mundle, C. W. K. “Primary and Secondary qualities”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122,
1967, p. 33-38.
Locke, Don. “Appearance-determined qualities”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122, 1967,
p. 39-42.
Woods, John. “The opacity of tridence”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122, 1967, p. 43-48.
McQueen, Donald. “Inference and novelty”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122, 1967, p. 4955.
Pole, David. “A note on truth”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122, 1967, p. 56-58.
O’Connor, John. “Differential properties and Goodman’s riddle”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New
Series n. 122, 1967, p. 59.
Guerry, Herbert. “Sommer’s ontological proof”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122, 1967, p.
60-61.
Noble Denis, “The conceptualist view of teleology”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122,
1967, p. 62-63.
McCormick, Susan. “The beneficial and the harmful”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 2, New Series n. 122,
1967, p. 64.
Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123, 1968
Duncan-Jones, Austin. “Man’s mortality”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123, 1968, p. 6570.
Braithwaite, R. B. “Austtin Duncan-Jones’ philosophical writings”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New
Series n. 123, 1968, p. 71-77.
Herbert, Robert. “Puzzle cases and earthquakes”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123, 1968,
p. 78-89.
Dilman, Ilham. “Imagination”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123, 1968, p. 90-97.
Siegler, Frederick Adrian. “Omissions”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123, 1968, p. 98-106.
Hunter, J. F. M. “Aune and others on ifs and cans”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123,
1968, p. 107-109.
New, Christopher. “ ‘Someone’ renewed”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 3, New Series n. 123, 1968, p. 109112.
Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124, 1968
Jones, O. R. “In disputation of an undisputed thesis”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124,
1968, p. 113-122.
Swinburne, R. G. “Grue”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124, 1968, p. 123-128.
Gallie, Roger D. “A correction to Lemmon on S”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124, 1968,
p. 128-130.
O’Connor, John. “On eliminating self-reference”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124, 1968,
p. 131-132.
Lloyd Thomas, D. A. “Consequences”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124, 1968, p. 133141.
Castaneda, Hector-Neri. “A problem for utilitarianism”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n. 124,
1968, p. 141-142.
Gustafson, Donald. “A note on a misreading of Wittgenstein”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 4, New Series n.
124, 1968, p. 143-144.
Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series n. 125, 1968
Zemach, E. M. “Many times”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series n. 125, 1968, p. 145-151.
Candlish, Stewart. “Existence and the use of proper names”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series n.
125, 1968, p. 152-158.
Haack, Susan. “Equivocality: a discussion of Sommer’s views”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series
n. 125, 1968, p. 159-165.
Dretske, Fred I. “Reasons and consequences”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series n. 125, 1968, p.
166-168.
Taylor, Gabreile and Wolfram, Sybil. “Mill, punishment and the self-regarding”. Analysis, v. 28,
n. 5, New Series n. 125, 1968, p. 168-172.
Helm, Paul “Defeasibility and open texture”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series n. 125, 1968, p.
173-175.
Runciman, W. G. “Misdescribing misdescriptions”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 5, New Series n. 125,
1968, p. 175-176.
Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126, 1968
Phillips, D. Z. “Miss Anscombe’s grocer”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126, 1968, p. 177179.
Williamson, Colwyn. “The grocers of Miss Anscombe and Mr. Philips”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6,
New Series n. 126, 1968, p. 179-182.
Leiber, Justin. “In respect of liking”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126, 1968, p. 183-188.
McKenzie,J. C. “The externalization of pains”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126, 1968, p.
189-193.
Thomas, William J. “Platonism and Skolem paradox”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126,
1968, p. 193-196.
Manser, Anthony. “How did Kant define “analytic”?” Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126,
1968, p. 197-199.
Aldrich, Virgil C. “Analytic a posteriori propositions”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126,
1968, p. 200-202.
Wheatley, Jon. “Opacity and Tridency”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126, 1968, p. 203206.
Harris, Roy. “Self-description and the theory of types”. Analysis, v. 28, n. 6, New Series n. 126,
1968, p. 207-208.
Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969
Swinburne, R. G. “Projectible predicates”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969, p. 1-11.
Zemach, Eddy M. “Reference and belief”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969, p. 1115.
McClintock, Thomas. “ ‘Real’ and excluders”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969, p.
16-22.
Armstrong, D. M. “Dispositions are causes”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969, p.
23-26.
Brennan, Andrew. “Persons and their brains”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969, p.
27-31.
Carter, W. R. “Grice on promising on condition”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 1, New Series n. 133, 1969,
p. 31-32.
Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134, 1969
Mish’Alani, James K. “¨Duty¨.¨obligation¨ and ¨ought¨”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134,
1969, p. 33-40.
Leiber, Justin. “Meaning and liking again”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134, 1969, p. 4041.
Williams, C. J. F. “Inferences concerning wishes”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134, 1969,
p. 42-45.
Prior, N. “Self-perception and contingency”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134, 1969, p. 4649.
Mannison, D. S. “Doing something on purpose but not intentionally”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New
Series n. 134, 1969, p. 49-52.
Gibbs, Benjamin. “Putman on brains and behaviour”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134,
1969, p. 53-55.
Sloman, Aaron. “Transformations of illocutionary acts”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134,
1969, p. 56-59.
Miller, Richard W. “On the privacy of colour”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134, 1969, p.
60-61.
Furlong, E. J. “Mental images and Mr. O. Hanfling”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 2, New Series n. 134,
1969, p. 62-64.
Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135, 1969
Mayo, Bernard. “A new approach to conditionals”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135, 1969,
p. 65-77.
Aune, Bruce. “Free will, “can” and ethics: a reply to Lehrer”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n.
135, 1969, p. 77-83.
Garner, Richard T. “Lemmon on sentences, statements and propositions”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3,
New Series n. 135, 1969, p. 83-91.
Nelson, Jack. “Prior on Leibniz’s law”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135, 1969, p. 92-94.
Sayward, Charles “Williams’ definition of “x is true””. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135,
1969, p. 95-97.
Harman, Gilbert H. “Is true”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135, 1969, p. 98-99.
Clarke Jr, D. S. “Mood constancy in mixed inferences”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135,
1969, p. 100-103.
Radford, Colin. “Does unwitting knowledge entail unconscious belief?” Analysis, v. 30, n. 3,
New Series n. 135, 1969, p. 103-107.
Chapman, Tobias “A note on bitemporality”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135, 1969, p.
108-110.
Pratt, Vernon. “Time for a change”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, New Series n. 135, 1969, p. 111-112.
Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136, 1969
MacKay, Alfred F. “Attributive-predicative”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136, 1969, p.
113-120.
Michalos, Alex C. “Analytic and other “dumb” guides of life”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series
n. 136, 1969, p. 121-123.
Simpson, R. L. “Quine on ambiguity”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136, 1969, p. 124-125.
Perkins, Modelan “The knowing in seeing”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136, 1969, p.
125-131.
Lesher, James H. “Danto on Knowledge as a relation”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136,
1969, p. 132-134.
Winslade, William J. “Recklessness”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136, 1969, p. 135-140.
Gotkürdel, K. G. and King-Farlow, J. “Über formal entscheidbare Sätzenkonjunktionen der
Princia Theologica und verwandter Systeme”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 4, New Series n. 136, 1969, p.
140-144.
Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137, 1970
Hollis, Martin. “Monadologue”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137, 1970, p. 145-147.
Martin, Raymond. “Conditionally necessary causes”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137,
1970, p. 147-150.
Cargile, James. “Anote on “iterated knowing” ”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137, 1970, p.
151-155.
Vision, Gerald. “Searle on the nature of universals”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137,
1970, p. 155-160.
Wedeking, Gary A. “Are there command arguments?”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137,
1970, p. 161-166.
Sanford, David H. “Downing on positive and negative terms”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n.
137, 1970, p. 167-172.
Downing, Peter. “Positive and negative terms-again”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 5, New Series n. 137,
1970, p. 173-176.
Analysis, v. 30, n. 6, New Series n. 138, 1970
Tugendhat, Ernst. “The meaning of “Bedeutung” in Frege”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 6, New Series n.
138, 1970, p. 177-189.
Bambrough, Renford. “Foundations”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 6, New Series n. 138, 1970, p. 190-197.
O’Hagan, Timothy. “Three-dimensional Greach”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 6, New Series n. 138, 1970,
p. 197-200.
Ellis, A. J. “Causes and objects of emotions”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 6, New Series n. 138, 1970, p.
201-205.
Cousin, D. R. “On the ownership pf images”. Analysis, v. 30, n. 6, New Series n. 138, 1970, p.
206-208.
Analysis, v. 31, n. 1, New Series n. 139, 1970
O’Shaughnessy, Brian. “The powerlessness of dispositions”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 1, New Series n.
139, 1970, p. 1-15.
Squires, Roger. “Are dispositions lost causes?”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 1, New Series n. 139, 1970, p.
15-18.
Bell, J. M. “Opacity and Identity”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 1, New Series n. 139, 1970, p. 19-24.
Jones, O. R. “On truth – a reply to C. J. F. Williams”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 1, New Series n. 139,
1970, p. 24-29.
Puccetti, Ronald. Mr. “Brennan on person’s brains”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 1, New Series n. 139,
1970, p. 30-32.
Analysis, v. 31, n. 2, New Series n. 139, 1970
Dilman, Ilham. “Wittgenstein, philosophy and logic”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 2, New Series n. 139,
1970, p. 33-42.
Brunton, Alan. “A model for the religious philosophy for D. Z. Phillips”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 2,
New Series n. 139, 1970, p. 43-48.
Durrant, Michael. “Feature universals and sortal universals”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 2, New Series n.
139, 1970, p. 49-52.
Child, James and Goldberg,“ Fred I. “Exists” as a predicate – a reconsideration”. Analysis, v. 31,
n. 2, New Series n. 139, 1970, p. 53-57.
Wilkins, Burleigh T. “The limits of historical knowledge”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 2, New Series n.
139, 1970, p. 58-62.
Zemach, Eddy M. “Time and Time again”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 2, New Series n. 139, 1970, p. 6264.
Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n. 140, 1971
Colin Radford. “Characterizing-judments and their causal counterparts”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3,
New Series n. 140, 1971, p. 65-75.
Tylor, Gabriele and Wolfram, Sybil. “Virtues and passions”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n.
140, 1971, p. 76-83.
Dinello, Daniel. “On killing and letting die”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n. 140, 1971, p. 8386.
Resnick, Lawrence. “Evidence, utility and God”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n. 140, 1971,
p. 87-90.
MacKay, Alfred F. “The principle of mood constancy”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n. 140,
1971, p. 91-96.
Genova, A. C. “ “Jonesese” and substitutivity”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n. 140, 1971, p.
96-103.
George, F. H. “Belief statements and their logic”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series n. 140, 1971,
p. 104-105.
Garner, Richard T. “Some doubts about illocutionary negation”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 3, New Series
n. 140, 1971, p. 106-112.
Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n. 141, 1971
Robinson, Richard. “Begging the question, 1971”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n. 141, 1971,
p. 113-117.
Whiteley, C. H “Empirical, analytic, evaluative”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n. 141, 1971,
p. 118-121.
Mayberry, Thomas C. “The same psychological state”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n. 141,
1971, p. 122-127.
Helm, Paul. “Pretending and intending”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n. 141, 1971, p. 127132.
Smart, Brian. “Can disembodied persons be spatially located?”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series
n. 141, 1971, p. 133-138.
Wilkins, Burleigh T. “Concerning “motive” and “intention” ”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n.
141, 1971, p. 139-142.
Abbott, W. R. “What knowledge is not?”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 4, New Series n. 141, 1971, p. 143144.
Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New Series n. 142, 1971
Cargile, James. “On near knowledge”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New Series n. 142, 1971, p. 145-152.
Black, Carilyn. “Knowledge without belief”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New Series n. 142, 1971, p.
152-158.
Lycan, William G. “Williams and Stroud on Shoemaker’s sceptic”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New
Series n. 142, 1971, p. 159-162.
Candlish, Stewart. “Physiological discoveries: criteria or symptoms”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New
Series n. 142, 1971, p. 162-165.
Murphy, Jeffrie G. “Three mistakes about retributivism”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New Series n. 142,
1971, p. 166-169.
Evra, James Van. “On death as a limit”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 5, New Series n. 142, 1971, p. 170176.
Analysis, v. 31, n. 6, New Series n. 144, 1971
Thomas, William J. “On behalf of the Skolemite”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 6, New Series n. 144, 1971,
p. 177-186.
Herzberger, Hans G. “The expressive capacity of non-translational languages”. Analysis, v. 31, n.
6, New Series n. 144, 1971, p. 186-193.
Robinson, G. S. “Popper’s verisimilitude. Analysis, v. 31, n. 6, New Series n. 144, 1971, p. 194196.
Place, U. T. “The infallibility of our knowledge of our own beliefs”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 6, New
Series n. 144, 1971, p. 197-204.
Matthews, Gareth B. “On not being said to do two things”. Analysis, v. 31, n. 6, New Series n.
144, 1971, p. 204-208.
Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145, 1971
Duncan-Jones, Austin. “Dissent from precepts”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145, 1971, p.
1-5.
Linsky, Leonard and Schumm, George F. “Frege’s way out: a footnote”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1,
New Series n. 145, 1971, p. 5-7.
Humberstone, I. L. “Two sorts of “ought”s”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145, 1971, p. 811.
Kordig, Carl R. “Moral weakness and self-reference”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145,
1971, p. 11-12.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. “There are command sh-iference”s. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n.
145, 1971, p. 13-19.
Jones, O. R. “Knowing and guessing – by examples”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145,
1971, p. 19-23.
West, David. “Phillips, Mounce and repaying what we borrow”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series
n. 145, 1971, p. 24-26.
White, Alan R. “Meaning and implication”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145, 1971, p. 2630.
Attfield, Robin. “Collective responsibility”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 1, New Series n. 145, 1971, p. 3132.
Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n. 146, 1971
Clark, Michael. “Ifs and hooks”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n. 146, 1971, p. 33-39.
Morick, Harold. “Intentionality and the psychological”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n. 146,
1971, p. 39-44.
Perkins Jr., R. K. “On Russell’s alleged confusion of sense and reference”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 2,
New Series n. 146, 1971, p. 45-51.
Hoffman, Robert. “On begging the question at any time”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n. 146,
1971, p. 51.
Sloman, Aaron. “New bodies for sick persons: personal indetity without physical continuity”.
Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n. 146, 1971, p. 52-55.
Myro, George. “A note on strict implication and entailment”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n.
146, 1971, p. 55-56.
Williams, C. J. F. “Truth: a composite rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 2, New Series n. 146, 1971,
p. 57-64.
Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972
Haight, M. R. “Picturing unreality”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 65-67.
Hill, Christopher S. “Gavagai”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 68-75.
Lycan, William G. and Oldenquist, Andrew. “Can the generalization argument be reinstated?”
Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 76-81.
Westphal, Fred “Utilitarianism and “conjunctive acts”: a reply to Professor Castañeda”. Analysis,
v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 82-85.
Harrison, Jonathan “The letter”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 86-89.
Clegg, Jerry S. “Symptoms”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 90-98.
Brady, James B. “Indefference and voluntariness”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972,
p. 98-99.
Spangler, G. A. “Mannison on doing something on purpose but not intentionally”. Analysis, v.
32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 100-101.
Sayward, Charles. “True propositions: a reply to C. J. F. Williams”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New
Series n. 147, 1972, p. 101-103.
Jones, O. R. “Truth and predication”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New Series n. 147, 1972, p. 104-110.
Johnsen,Bredo C. “Black and the inductive justification of induction”. Analysis, v. 32, n. 3, New
Series n. 147, 1972, p. 110-112.
Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972
Nickel, James W. “Discrimination and morally relevant characteristics”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4,
New Series n. 148, 1972, p. 113-114.
Singer, Peter. “Moral experts”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972, p. 115-117.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. “On the problem of formulating a coherent act-utilitarianism”. Analysis,
v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972, p. 118-124.
Zellner, Harold N. “Utilitarianism and derived obligation”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n.
148, 1972, p. 124-125.
Wallace, G. “Cargile on Utilitarianism”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972, p. 126131.
Finnis, John. “The retoration of retribution”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972, p.
131-135.
Davis, Lawrence H. “They deserve to suffer”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972, p.
136-140.
Gilbert, Margaret. “The abilities of prescriptivism”. Analysis, v. 32, n.4, New Series n. 148, 1972,
p. 141-144.
Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149, 1972
Smart, Brian. “How to reidentify the ship op Theseus”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149,
1972, p. 145-148
.
Haksar, Vinit. “Rawl’s theory of justice”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149, 1972, p. 149153.
Boër, Steven E. “On Searle’s analysis of reference”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149,
1972, p. 154-159.
Cooper, David E. “Searle on intentions and reference”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149,
1972, p. 159-163.
Simpson, R. L. “Stoics, sleepers and stones”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149, 1972, p.
164-167
Martin, Michael “Confirmation and explanation”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149, 1972,
p. 167-169.
Radford, Colin. “On sticking to what I Don’t believe to be the case”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New
Series n. 149, 1972, p. 170-173.
Mannison, D. S. “Matthews on enjoying digging”. Analysis, v. 32, n.5, New Series n. 149, 1972,
p. 173-176.
Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972
Steward Thau: “The distinction between rhetic and illocutionary acts”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New
Series n. 150, 1972, p. 177-183.
Vera Peetz: “Propositional content”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 183-186.
J. E. Wiredu: “A note on modal quantification, ontology and the indenumerably infinite”.
Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 186-191.
Dale, J. “ ‘Orders’ of sets”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 192-194.
Gustason, William W. “Miss Anscombe on the ‘general propositional form’ ”. Analysis, v. 32,
n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 195-196.
Sanford, David H. “Begging the question”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 197199.
Perkins Jr, R. K. “Urmson on Russell’s incomplete symbols”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n.
150, 1972, p. 200-203.
Bales, Eugene. “Utilitarianism, overall obligatoriness and deontic logic”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6,
New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 203-205.
Charlton, W. “Miss Haight on picturing unreality”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6, New Series n. 150, 1972,
p. 206-207.
McMullen, W. A. “Censorship and participatory democracy: a paradox”. Analysis, v. 32, n.6,
New Series n. 150, 1972, p. 207-208.
Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151, 1972
Hamblin, C. L. “You and I”. 1-4.
M. B. Smyth: “The prescriptivist definition of ‘better’ ”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151,
1972, p. 4-9.
Cowan, J. L. “Inverse discrimination”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151, 1972, p. 10-12.
Beehler, Rodger. “Reasons for reasons for being moral”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151,
1972, p. 12-16.
Nielsen, Kai. “On giving reasons for being moral”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151, 1972,
p. 17-19.
Beehler, Rodger.” Morals and reasons”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151, 1972, p. 19-21.
Dudman, V. H.“ ’Bedeutung’ in Frege: a reply“. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151, 1972, p.
21-27.
Harris, N. G. E. “On seeing everything upside down”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151,
1972, p. 28-31.
Winslade, William J. “Brady on recklessness”. Analysis, v. 33, n.1, New Series n. 151, 1972, p.
31-32.
Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New Series n. 152, 1972
Anscombe, G. E. M. and Feldman, J. “On the nature of justice in a trial”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2,
New Series n. 152, 1972, p. 33-36.
Johnson, Conrad D. “Davidson on primitive actions that cause deaths”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New
Series n. 152, 1972, p. 36-41.
Page, Edgar. “Senses of ‘obliged’ ”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New Series n. 152, 1972, p. 42-46.
Kearney, R. J. “Meaning and implication: other thoughts”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New Series n.
152, 1972, p. 47-50.
Miller, David. “The truth-likeness of truthlikeness”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New Series n. 152,
1972, p. 50-55.
Young, John J. “Ifs and hooks: a defence of the orthodox view”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New Series
n. 152, 1972, p. 56-62.
Dauer, Francis W. “How not to reidentify the Parthenon”. Analysis, v. 33, n.2, New Series n. 152,
1972, p. 63-64.
Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153, 1973
Harrison, Ross. “Lost times”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153, 1973, p. 65-71.
Swinburne, R. G. “Comfirmability and factual meaningfulness”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series
n. 153, 1973, p. 71-76.
Swartz, Norman. “Is there an Ozma-problem for time?” Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153,
1973, p. 77-82.
Martin, Michael. “Are cognitive processes and structure a myth?” Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New
Series n. 153, 1973, p. 83-88.
Carter, W. R. “On promising the un wanted”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153, 1973, p. 8892.
Geddes, Leonard. “On the intrinsic wrongness of killing innocent people”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3,
New Series n. 153, 1973, p. 93-97.
Bergström, Lars. “On the coherence of act-utilitarianism”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n.
153, 1973, p. 98-102.
Wedeking, Gary A. “Reasons for acting versus reasons for believing”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New
Series n. 153, 1973, p. 102-106.
Gower, Barry. “Martin on explanation and confirmation”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153,
1973, p. 107-109.
Davis, Lawrence H. “Smart on conditions of identity”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153,
1973, p. 109-110.
Urmson, J. O. “Russell’s incomplete symbols”. Analysis, v. 33, n.3, New Series n. 153, 1973, p.
111.
Schumm, George F. and Stevenson, John G. “Harman’s non-essential property”. Analysis, v. 33,
n.3, New Series n. 153, 1973, p. 112.
Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n. 154, 1973
Campbell, T. D. “Formal justice and rule-change”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n. 154, 1973,
p. 113-118.
Cherry, Christopher. “Two views of moral practices”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n. 154,
1973, p. 118-123.
Green, O. H. “Some supposed advantages of materialism”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n.
154, 1973, p. 124-128.
Iseminger, Gary. “Aesthetic judgments and non-aesthetic conditions”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New
Series n. 154, 1973, p. 129-132.
Miller, Barry. “Proper names and supposition personalis”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n.
154, 1973, p. 133-137.
Lycan, William G. “Davidson on saying that”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n. 154, 1973, p.
138-139.
Dummett, Michael. “Frege’s way out: a footnote to a footnote”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series
n. 154, 1973, p. 139-140.
Attfield, Robin. “How things exist: a difficulty”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New Series n. 154, 1973, p.
141-143.
Jones, H. M. “Censorship, state secrets and participatory democracy”. Analysis, v. 33, n.4, New
Series n. 154, 1973, p. 143-144.
Analysis, v. 33, n.5, New Series n. 155, 1973
Thalberg, Irving. “Ingredients of perception”. Analysis, v. 33, n.5, New Series n. 155, 1973, p.
145-155.
Walker, D. M. “Goodness of a kind and goodness form a point of view”. Analysis, v. 33, n.5,
New Series n. 155, 1973, p. 156-160
Naylor, Andrew. “On the evidence of one’s “memories” Analysis, v. 33, n.5, New Series n. 155,
1973, p. 160-167.
Monro, Hector. “Nonsense? Nonsense!” Analysis, v. 33, n.5, New Series n. 155, 1973, p. 167.
Gert, Bernard and Martin, James A. “What a man does he can do? ” Analysis, v. 33, n.5, New
Series n. 155, 1973, p. 168-173.
Altmann, D. R. “Geach on “know” in “if” clauses”. Analysis, v. 33, n.5, New Series n. 155, 1973,
p. 174-175.
La Croix, Richard R. “The incompatibility of omnipotence and omniscience”. Analysis, v. 33,
n.5, New Series n. 155, 1973, p. 176.
Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n. 156, 1973
Taylor, Paul W. “Reverse discrimination and compensatory justice”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New
Series n. 156, 1973, p. 177-182.
Bayles, Michael D. “Reparations to Wronged groups”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n. 156,
1973, p. 182-184.
Shiner, Roger A. “Individuals, groups and inverse discrimination”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New
Series n. 156, 1973, p. 185-187.
Gert, Bernard and Martin, James A. “Outcomes and abilities”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n.
156, 1973, p. 188-192.
Leahy, Michael. “Justice in a trial”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n. 156, 1973, p. 192-193.
Lewis, Carroll. “On undetectable differences in sensations”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n.
156, 1973, p. 193-194
.
Kirk, R. “Underdetermination of theory and indeterminacy of translation”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6,
New Series n. 156, 1973, p. 195-201.
Szabados, Béla. “Wishful thinking and self-deception”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n. 156,
1973, p. 201-205.
Böer, Stephen E. “Russell on classes as logical fictions”. Analysis, v. 33, n.6, New Series n. 156,
1973, p. 206-208.
Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973
Anscombe, C. E. M. “Hume and Julius Caesar”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p.
1-7.
Dolby, R. G. A. “Philosopy and the incompatibility of colours”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series
n. 157, 1973, p. 8-16.
Duff, R. A. “Intentionally killing the innocent”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p.
16-19.
Cornman, James W. and Dirnbach, Boris J. “Utilitarianism and the obligation to do exactly one
act”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p. 20-23.
Smart, Brian. “The ship of Theseus, the Parthenon, and disassemble objects”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1,
New Series n. 157, 1973, p. 24-27.
Stroll, Avrum. “Descriptions again”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p. 27-28.
Mounce, H.O. “Mr. Cherry on moral practices”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p.
29-30.
Silvestri, Philip. “The justification of inverse discrimination”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n.
157, 1973, p. 31.
Linsky, Leonard and Schumm, George F. “Tripping over one’s own footnote”. Analysis, v. 34,
n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p. 32.
Anscombe, G. E. M. “On justice in a trial”. Analysis, v. 34, n.1, New Series n. 157, 1973, p. 32.
Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973
Whiteley, C. H. “Rules of language”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973, p. 33-38.
Goldstick, D. “Refutation of ‘ethical egoism’ ”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973, p.
38-39.
Gordon, Robert M. “Judgmental emotions”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973, p. 4048.
Browning, Lorin. “On seeing everything upside down”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158,
1973, p. 48-49.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. “ ‘Ought’ and ‘better’ ”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973, p.
50-55.
Silvertein, Harry S. “A correction to Smyth’s ‘better’ ”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158,
1973, p. 55-56.
Bennett, Philip E. “The sleeper’s dream and the stoic’s pain: a reply to Simpson”. Analysis, v. 34,
n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973, p. 57-58.
Holborow, Les. “Formally just rule-changes”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New Series n. 158, 1973, p.
60-61.
Godbey Jr., John W. “The incompatibility of omnipotence and omniscience”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2,
New Series n. 158, 1973, p. 62.
La Croix, Richard R. “Omnipotence, omniscience and necessity”. Analysis, v. 34, n.2, New
Series n. 158, 1973, p. 63-64.
Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159, 1974
Gallie, R. D. “A. N.: prior and substitutional quantification”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n.
159, 1974, p. 65-69.
Cohen, L. Jonathan. “Roger Gallie and substitutional quantification”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New
Series n. 159, 1974, p. 69-73.
Mellor, D. H. “Special relativity and present truth”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159, 1974,
p. 74-77.
Clark, Michael. “Ifs and hooks: a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159, 1974, p. 7783.
Edwards, J. S. “A confusion about if…. Then”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159, 1974, p.
84-90.
Dale, J. “A defence of material implication”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159, 1974, p. 9195.
Holmes, Robert L. “Is morality a system of hypothetical imperatives?” Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New
Series n. 159, 1974, p. 96-100.
Cherry, Christopher. “The limits of defeasibility”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159, 1974,
p. 101-107.
Meynell, Hugo. “On understating the unintelligible”. Analysis, v. 34, n.3, New Series n. 159,
1974, p. 108-112.
Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New Series n. 163, 1974
Cohen, Michael. “Truth-tables truth”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New Series n. 163, 1974, p. 1-7.
Champlin, T. S. and Walker, A. “Tendencies, frequencies and classical utilitarianism”. Analysis,
v. 35, n.1, New Series n. 163, 1974, p. 8-12.
Harman, Gilbert. “Identifying numbers”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New Series n. 163, 1974, p. 12.
Livingston, Donald W. “Anscombe, Hume and Julius Caesar”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New Series n.
163, 1974, p. 13-19.
Cambell, T. D. “Formal justice and rule-change: a reply to Holborow”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New
Series n. 163, 1974, p. 19-21.
Swinburne, R. G. “Meaningfulness without confirmability-a reply”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New
Series n. 163, 1974, p. 22-27.
Roberts, Colin. “Dale on material implication”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New Series n. 163, 1974, p.
27-28.
Perkins Jr, R. K. “Incomplete symbols again -a reply to Mr. Urmson”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New
Series n. 163, 1974, p. 29-31.
Lindsay, Anne. “On the slippery slope again”. Analysis, v. 35, n.1, New Series n. 163, 1974, p.
32.
Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974
Barker, John A. “Knowledge, ignorance and presupposition”. Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n.
164, 1974, p. 33-45.
Clegg, Jerry S. “What Magellan`s voyage didn`t prove or why the earth is flat”. Analysis, v. 35,
n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974, p. 46-48.
Slater, B. H. “The examiner examined”. Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974, p. 49-50.
Carr, C. “Whiteley on rules of language”. Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974, p. 51-53.
Foot, Philippa. “ Is morality a system of hypothetical imperatives?- a reply to Mr. Holmes”.
Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974, p. 53-56.
Genova, C. “On Anscombe`s exposition of Hume”. Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974,
p. 57-62.
Grim, Patrick. “Wright on functions”. Analysis, v. 35, n.2, New Series n. 164, 1974, p. 62-64.
Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n. 165, 1975
Graham, Keith. “Moral notions and moral misconceptions”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n.
165, 1975, p. 65-78.
Baldwin, Thomas. “Indirect reference”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n. 165, 1975, p. 78-83.
Downing, Peter. “Conditionals, impossibilities and material implications”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3,
New Series n. 165, 1975, p. 84-91.
Rudinow, Joel. “Further in the modest defence”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n. 165, 1975, p.
91-92.
Conway, David A. “D. Z. Phillips and “the inadequacy of language”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New
Series n. 165, 1975, p. 93-97.
Gallie, R.D. “Substitutionalsm and substitutional quantification”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series
n. 165, 1975, p. 97-101.
Richards, Norvin. “Gods and viruses”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n. 165, 1975, p. 102-104.
Clark, Michael. “Utterer`s meaning and implications about belief”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New
Series n. 165, 1975, p. 105-108.
Halbasch, Keith. “An observation on English truth-functions”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n.
165, 1975, p. 109-110.
Budlong, Theodore W. “Analogy, induction and other minds”. Analysis, v. 35, n.3, New Series n.
165, 1975, p. 111-112.
Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n. 166, 1975
Hughes,Martin. “Forgiveness”. Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n. 166, 1975, p. 113-117.
Briskman, Larry “Classical semantics and entailment”. Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n. 166,
1975, p. 118-126.
Kielkoff, Charles F. “Adjunction and paradoxical derivations”. Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n.
166, 1975, p. 127-129.
Hudson, James L. “Logical subtraction”. Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n. 166, 1975, p. 130135.
Bird, G.H. “Confusing the audience”. Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n. 166, 1975, p. 135-139.
Helm, Paul. “Are “Cambridge” changes non-events?” Analysis, v. 35, n.4, New Series n. 166,
1975, p. 140-144.
Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n. 167, 1975
Dreher, John H. “Who’s at fault?” Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n. 167, 1975, p. 145-147.
Hanink, James G. “Some light on double effect”. Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n. 167, 1975, p.
147-151.
Nelson, Jack and Welker, David “Pleasure and the intrinsically desired”. Analysis, v. 35, n.5,
New Series n. 167, 1975, p.152-159.
Luckhardt, C. G. “Romorse, regret and the Socratic paradox”. Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n.
167, 1975, p. 159-166.
Picayune, M. “Jones`s body and Marks and Spencer`s”. Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n. 167,
1975, p. 167-168.
Goldman, Anlan H. “Reparations to individuals or groups?” Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n.
167, 1975, p. 168-170.
Richmond, Samuel A. “Value predictions: simple or complex?” Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series
n. 167, 1975, p. 171-174.
Nusenoff, Ronald E. “The Kneale-Wiggins regress”. Analysis, v. 35, n.5, New Series n. 167,
1975, p. 174-176.
Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975
McGinn, Colin. “A note on the essence of natural kinds”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168,
1975, p. 177-183.
Friedman, Kenneth S. “Resolving a paradox of inductive probability”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New
Series n. 168, 1975, p. 183-185.
Geach, P. T. “On entailment”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p. 186-187.
Corrado, Michael. “What de re belief is not?” Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p.
188-192.
Sikkora, R. I. “Rorty`s new mark of the mental”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p.
192-194.
Sikora, R. I . “Swinburne on confirmability”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p.
195.
Rudinow, Joel and Sikora, R. I. “Are there art-critical concepts?” Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series
n. 168, 1975, p. 196-199.
Lyons, William “Determinism and knowledge”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p.
200-204.
Pierce, Christine “Hart on pternalim”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p. 205-207
Odegard, Douglas “Locke`s unnatural kinds”. Analysis, v. 35, n.6, New Series n. 168, 1975, p.
208.
Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169, 1975
Cohen, Michael. “Dummettt on assertion”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169, 1975, p. 1-5.
Goldman, Alan H. “A note on the conjunctivity of knowledge”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series
n. 169, 1975, p. 5-9.
Dudman, V. H. “Schematic letters and variables”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169, 1975,
p. 10-12.
Peetz, Vera. “Ifs, hooks and illocutionary acts”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169, 1975, p.
13-17.
Bradley, M. C. “Kirk on indeterminacy of translation”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169,
1975, p. 18-22.
Godbe Jr., John W. “Central-state materialism and parapsychology”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New
Series n. 169, 1975, p. 22-25.
Whiteley,C. H. “Rules of language: reply to Mr. Carr”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169,
1975, p. 25-27.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles “Quine`s way out”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169,
1975, p. 28-37.
Packard, Dennis Jay. “A note on Wittgenstein and cyclical comparatives”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1,
New Series n. 169, 1975, p. 37-40.
Martin, Michael. “Explanation and confirmation again”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169,
1975, p. 41-42.
Waterlow, Sarah. “On a proposed refutation of Hume”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169,
1975, p. 43-46.
Sayward, Charles. “The province of logic”. Analysis, v. 36, n.1, New Series n. 169, 1975, p. 4748.
Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976
Analysis. “ProblemNº 15”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p. 49.
Noonan, H. W. “Dummett on Abstract Objects”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p.
49-54.
Shiner, Roger A. and Bickenbach, Jerome E. “Misconceptions about moral notions”. Analysis, v.
36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p. 55-67.
Duff, R. A. “Absolute principles and double effect”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170,
1976, p. 68-80.
Grover, Dorothy L. “ ‘This is false’ on the prosentencial”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170,
1976, p. 80-83.
Twambley, P. “Mercy and forgiveness”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p. 84-90.
Ketchum, Sara Ann and Pierce, Christine. “Implicit racism”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n.
170, 1976, p. 91-95.
Borwski, E. J. “English and truth functions”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p. 96100.
Schumacher, John A. “Memory unchained again”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976,
p. 101-104.
Carter, W. R. “On a priori contingent truths”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p.
105-106.
Chandler, Hugh S. “Plantinga and the contigently possible”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n.
170, 1976, p. 106-109.
Danquah, Joseph. “The circularity of the proof of the non-independence of the fourth axiom of
Principia Mathematica”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170, 1976, p. 110-111.
Clark, Machael. “If conditions were not contraposable”. Analysis, v. 36, n.2, New Series n. 170,
1976, p. 112.
Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976
Brooks, D. H. M. “Cohen`s criticism of Dummett”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976,
p. 113-117.
Long, Peter. “On expressing functions and properties”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171,
1976, p. 118-125.
Hunter, J. F. M. “A puzzle about dreaming”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976, p.
126-131.
Williams, Clifford E. “Meaning, reference and tense”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171,
1976, p. 132-136.
New, Christopher. “Look, no eyes”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976, p. 137-141.
Jaeger, Robert A. “Logical subtraction and the analysis of action”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New
Series n. 171, 1976, p. 141-146.
Noonan, H. W. “Tractatus 2.0211-2.0212.” Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976, p. 147149.
Olen, Jeffrey “Is undefeated justified true belief knowledge?” Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n.
171, 1976, p. 150-152
Locke, Don. “Why the Utilitarians shot President Kennedy”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n.
171, 1976, p. 153-155.
Wright, Larry. “Reply to Grim”. Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976, p. 156-157.
Woodruff, Paul. “What`s wrong with discrimination?” Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171,
1976, p. 158-160.
Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976
Anscombe, G. E. M. “On frustration of the majority by fulfilment of the majority`s will”.
Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 161-168.
Crocker, Lawrence. “Egoistic hedonism”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 168176.
Werner, Richard. “Hare on abortion”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 177-181.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Prior on propositional identity”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New
Series n. 172, 1976, p. 182-184.
Tiles, J. E. “Davidson`s criterion of event identity”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172,
1976, p. 185-187.
Noonan, H. W. “Sentences and names in Frege”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976,
p. 188-190.
Robins, Michael H. “Promissory obligations and Rawls`s contractarianism”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4,
New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 190-198.
Holmes, Robert L. “Philippa Foot on hypothetical imperatives”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series
n. 172, 1976, p. 199-200.
Odegard, Douglas. “On a priori contingency”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p.
201-203.
Stone, John David. “A formalization of Geach`s antinomy”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n.
172, 1976, p. 203-207.
Brown, James M. “Bernays`s non-circular poof of the non-independence of the fourth axiom of
Principia Mathematica”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 207-208.
Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976
Godfrey-Smith, William. “Names, indices and individuals”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n.
173, 1976, p. 1-10.
Haksar, Vinit. “The alleged paradox of democracy”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173,
1976, p. 10-14.
Nerlich, Graham. “Quine`s ‘real ground’ ” Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 1519.
Corrigendum. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 19.
Holt, P. J. “Causality and our conception of matter”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173,
1976, p. 20-29
Bertolet, R. J. “On the merits of entrenchment”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p.
29-31.
Noonan, H. W. “The four-dimensional world”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p.
32-39.
Fumerton, R. A. “Chandler on the contingently possible”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n.
173, 1976, p. 39-40.
Braude, Stephen E. “Tenses and meaning change”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976,
p. 41-44.
Cohen, Michael. “Assertion: a reply to Brooks”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p.
44-45.
Kleinberg, Stanley S. “Woodruff on discrimination”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173,
1976, p. 46-48.
Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977
Postow, B. C. “Generalized act utilitarianism”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p.
49-52.
Matthews, Gareth B. “Surviving as”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 53-58.
Derkesen, A. “A muddle in White`s modal thinking”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174,
1977, p. 59-67.
Hyslop, Alec. “Girice without an audience”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 6769.
Cahn, Stephen M. “Cacadaemony”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 69-73.
Woodruff, Paul. T”he bystander paradox”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 7478.
McGinn, Colin. “Anamalous monism and Kripke`s Cartesian intuitions”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2,
New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 78-80.
Leahy, M. “Lies, damned lies, and Miss Anscombe”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174,
1977, p. 80-81.
Dancy, Jonathan. “The logical conscience”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 8184.
Kraemer Russert, Eric. “Conjunctive properties and scientific realism”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New
Series n. 174, 1977, p. 85-86.
Sainsbury, R. M. “Semantics by proxy”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 86-96.
Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p.
Analysis competition. “Problem Nº 16”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 97.
White, Michael J. “Plantinga and the actual world”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175,
1977, p. 97-104.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Prior`s theory of propositions”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New
Series n. 175, 1977, p. 104-112.
Fulmer, Gilbert. “The concept of the supernatural”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175,
1977, p. 113-116.
Nathan, N. M. L. “What vitiates an infinite regress of justification?” Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New
Series n. 175, 1977, p. 116-126.
Strom, James J. “On squaring some circles of logic”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175,
1977, p. 127-129.
New, Christopher. “Implicit bargaining and moral beliefs”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n.
175, 1977, p. 130-133.
Devereux, Daniel. “Artifacts, natural objects, and works of art”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series
n. 175, 1977, p. 134-136.
Kirk, Robert. “More on Quine`s reasons for indeterminacy of translation”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3,
New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 136-141.
Wheeler, Arthur M. “Prima facie and actual duty”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977,
p. 142-144.
Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977
William, Bernard. “Report on Analysis problem nº 15”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176,
1977, p. 145.
Osborn, D. A. “On deciphering the tables”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 145146.
Karmo, Toomas. “Disturbances” Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 147-148.
Bench-Capon, T. “A note on Mr. Karmo`s disturbances”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176,
1977, p. 148-149.
Freeman, James B. “A caution on propositional indentity”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n.
176, 1977, p. 149-151.
Casullo, Albert. “Kripke on the a priori and necessary”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176,
1977, p. 152-159.
Martinich, P. “The attributive use of proper names”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176,
1977, p. 159-163.
Noonan, H. W. “An argument of Aristotle on non-contradiction”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New
Series n. 176, 1977, p. 13-169.
Grim, Patrick. “Further notes on functions”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p.
169-176.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Saying of”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 177-185.
Frey, R. G. “Animal rights”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 186-189.
Tienson, John. “Can things of different natural kids be exactly alike?” Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New
Series n. 176, 1977, p. 190-197.
McLanchlan, Hugh V. “Must we accept either the conservative or the liberal view on abortion?”
Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 197-204.
Quest, Edward. “Whatever arises from a just distribution by just steps is itself just” Analysis, v.
37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 204-208.
Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978
Editorial. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p.1.
Thalberg, Irving. “The irreducibility of events”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p.
1-9.
Measor, Nicholas. “Frege, Dummett and the Philistines”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176,
1978, p. 10-16.
Locke, Con. “How to make a Mewcomb choice”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978,
p. 17-23.
Holland, Alan. “Carnap on Frege on indirect reference”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176,
1978, p. 24-32.
Jamieson, Dale and Regan, Tom. “Animal rights: a reply to Frey”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New
Series n. 176, 1978, p. 32-36.
Simon, Robert L. “Statistical justifications of discrimination”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n.
176, 1978, p. 37-42.
Griffin, Nicholas. “An invalid epistemological argument against”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New
Series n. 176, 1978, p. 42-45.
Gorman, J. L. “A problem in the justification of democracy”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n.
176, 1978, p. 46-50.
Jensen, Henning. “Rudinow and Sikora on art-critical concepts”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series
n. 176, 1978, p. 51-56.
Brooks, D. “Assertions: a reply to Cohen”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 5658.
King-Farlow, John. “Cacodaemony and devilish isomorphism”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series
n. 176, 1978, p. 59-61.
Steiner, Hillel. “The distribution game”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 61-62.
Woodruff, Paul. “Unfair to groups: a reply to Kleinberg”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n.
176, 1978, p. 62-64.
Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978
Problem n° 17: Analysis, competition. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 65.
Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan. “The power of Russell´s criticism of Frege”. Analysis, v. 38,
n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 65-77.
Bauerle, Rainer. “Fugitive proposition again”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p.
78-80.
Schlossberger, Egune. “Similirity and Counterfactuals”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178,
1978, p. 80-82.
McMichael, Alan. “Too much of a good thing: a problem in doontic logic”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2,
New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 83-83.
Lewis, David. “Reply to McMichael”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 85-86.
Harrison, Jonathan. “Heir of Frankenstein”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 8791.
D. S. Clarke, Jr. “The addressing function of “T” ”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178,
1978, p. 91-93.
Keating, B. F. “Blackburn on the intersubstitutibility of proper names”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New
Series n. 178, 1978, p. 94-98.
Dale, A. J. “Refernce, truth-funcionality and causal sentences”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series
n. 178, 1978, p. 99-106.
Haven, Steven De. “Descartes, Frankfurt and uncelmen”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178,
1978, p. 107-109.
Boer, Steven E. “The irrelevance of the Free will defence”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n.
178, 1978, p. 110-112.
Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978
Butler, Ronald J. “Apology”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 113.
Ross, David. “Report on Analysis, problem N°16”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978,
p. 113-114.
Russert Kramer, Eric. “He loads the gun, nor the dice”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 114-115.
Lowe, E. J. “Itentional action, chance and control”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 115-116.
Bjuröf, Thomas. “Neither intentional nor unintentional”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 116-118.
Peacocke, Christopher. “A note on logical constans”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 119-121.
O´Neil, Richard. “A reply to Bjurlöf´s objection”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978,
p. 122-124.
Simons, Peter M. “Killing, letting die, and justice”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 124-125.
White, Alan. R. “Alewy on C. I. Lewis and entailment”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 126-129.
White, Alan R. “Aquiring and possessing knowledge”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 129-131.
Mcharry, John D. “A theodicy”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 132-134.
King, John L. “Chandler on contingent identity”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978,
p. 135-136.
Montnarquet, James. “Actions and bidily movements”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179,
1978, p. 137-140.
Woodfiel Andrew. “Identity theories and the arguments from epistemic counterparts”. Analysis,
v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 140-143.
McGim, Colin. “Reply to Woodfield”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 144-146.
Clarck, Stephen R. L. “Animal wrongs”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 147149.
Bradley, M. C. “More on kirk and Quine on undeletermintion and indenterminacy”. Analysis, v.
38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 150-159.
Ackerman, Inge, Akerman, Robert and Hendricks, Betty. “Wittegenstein´s fairy tale”. Analysis,
v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 159-160.
Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978
Simons, Peter M. “Logic and common nouns”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p.
161-167.
Noonan, H. W. “Count nouns and mass nouns”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p.
167-172.
Baldwin, Thomas. “Kripke, pseudo-Kripke, and Wallece”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n.
180, 1978, p. 173-181.
Hadley, Robert F. “Possibility, neccessity and logical truth”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n.
180, 1978, p. 182-186.
Postow, B.C. “Rule utilitarianism in patial compliance theory”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series
n. 180, 1978, p. 187-193.
Primorac, Igor. “Utilitarianism and self-sacrifice of the innocent”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New
Series n. 180, 1978, p. 194-199.
Lovelace, Dave. “A note on the “bystander paradox” ”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180,
1978, p. 199-200.
Woodfield, Andrew. “Relojainder to mcGinn”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p.
201-203.
Geach, P. T. “Russell on denoting”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 204-205.
Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan. “Reply to Ceach”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180,
1978, p. 206-207.
Evans, Gareth. “Can there be vague objects?”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p.
208.
Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979
Allen Hazen. “One of the truths about actuality”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979,
p. 1-3.
Brade, Michael. “Pragmatism and internal realism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 4-10.
Feldman, Richard H. and Wierenga, Edward. “Thalberg on the irreducibility of events”. Analysis,
v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 11-16.
Spector, Arnold. “Assertions plain and coloured”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979,
p. 17-20.
Gibbins, Peter. “Material implications, the sufficcency contion, and conditional proof”. Analysis,
v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 21-24.
Burch, Robert. “Plantinga and leibniz´s Lapse”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p.
24-29.
Clarck, Michael. “Lewy´s conjectures about tautological entailment”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New
Series n. 181, 1979, p. 30-34.
Hazen, Allen and Slote, Michael”. “Even if”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p.
35-38.
Steiner, Mark. “Cartesian seepticism and epistemic logic”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n.
181, 1979, p. 38-41.
Odegard, Douglas. “Alston and self-warrant”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p.
42-44.
Pontow, A. C. Dishonest relativism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 45-48.
Gallois, André. “How not to make a Newcomb choise”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 49-53.
Robertson, Johan. “Woodruff on reverse discrimination”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 54-57.
Coughlan, M. J. “Moral evil without consequences?”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 58-60.
Pariches, Georg E. “Being a free to and being a fice”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 61-63.
Austin, A. K. “The unexpected examination”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p.
63-64.
Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979
Problem N° 18: Analysis, competins. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 65-66.
Quine, W. V. “Comunents an Newtin-Smith”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p.
66-67.
Frankoff, Robert. “Cartesian insanity”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 68-70.
Foley, Richard. “Compatibilism and control over the past”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n.
181, 1979, p. 70-74.
Rapaport, William J. “An adverbial Meinongain theory”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 75-81.
Lewis, Michael E and Leuin, Margarita. “The modal confusion in Rawl´s Original position”.
Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 82-87.
White, Michael J. “Aristotle and temporally relative modalties”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series
n. 181, 1979, p. 88-93.
Guttemplan, S. D “The paratactie account of saying of”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181,
1979, p. 94-100.
Yagisawa, T. “Countefactual Analysis, of causation adn Kim´s examples”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2,
New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 100-105.
Perloff, Micahel. “A better alternative”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 106108.
Peetz, Vera. “Imperative inference”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 109-112.
Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979
Hughes, G. E. “Report on Analysis problem n. 17”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183,
1979, p. 113-115.
Regan, Tom. “Singer`s critique of the market”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p.
115-117.
Singer, Peter. “Regan`s critique of Singer”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 118119.
White, Michael J. “The first person pronoun: a reply to Anscombe and Clarke”. Analysis, v. 39,
n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 120-123.
Meyer, Robert K., Routley, Richard and Dunn, J. Micahel. “Curriy`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 39, n.
3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 124-128.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “More on propositional identity”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New
Series n. 183, 1979, p. 130-132.
Merrill, G. H. “On the uniqueness of the identity relation”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n.
183, 1979, p. 133-136.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Reply to Guttemplan”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 136137.
Bertolet, Rod and Rowe, William J. “The fatalism of “Diodorus Cronus” ”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3,
New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 137-138.
Lowe, E. J. “Indicative and counterfactual conditionals”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183,
1979, p. 139-141.
Williams, J. N. “Moore`s paradox: one or two?” Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p.
141-142.
Zemach, Eddy M. “Time and self”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 143-147.
Ketchum, Sara Ann. “Evidence, statistics and rights: a reply to Simon”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New
Series n. 183, 1979, p. 148-153.
Ibberson, John. “A doubt about universal prescriptivism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n.
183, 1979, p. 153-158.
Geach, P. T. “Russell and Frege again”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 159.
Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan. “Geach again”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979,
p. 160.
Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979
Hare, R. M. “Universal and past-tense prescriptions: a reply to Mr. Ibberson”. Analysis, v. 39, n.
4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 161-165.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Paradox and semantical correctness”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4,
New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 166-169.
Martin, Robert L. “Reply to Hugly and Sayward”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979,
p. 169-174.
Noonan, H. W. “Rigid designation”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 174-182.
Keating, B. F. “Lockwood and Mill on connotation and predication”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New
Series n. 184, 1979, p. 183-188.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Actions and identities”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p.
189-194.
Nemirow, Laurence. “No argument against Ramsey”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184,
1979, p. 195-201.
Locke, Don. “Causation, compatibilism and Newcomb`s problem”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New
Series n. 184, 1979, p. 201-209.
Casullo, Albert. “Reid and Mill on Hume`s maxim of conceivability”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New
Series n. 184, 1979, p. 210-211.
Lederkramer, David L. “Quest on the entitlement theory”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n.
184, 1979, p. 212-219.
Gordon, David. “Is relativism dishonest?” Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 219222.
Gordon, David. “Steiner on Cartesian scepticism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979,
p. 223-224.
Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980
McKinsey, Michael. “Against a defence of cluster theories”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n.
185, 1980, p. 1-5.
Tennant, N. “On and E”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 5-7.
Peacocke, Christopher, “A reply to Tennant”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 89.
Dale, J. “Entailment and substitution instances”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p.
10-12.
Clark, Michael. “Reply to Dale”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 12.
Weale, Albert. “The impossibility of liberal egalitarianism”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n.
185, 1980, p. 13-19.
Robinson, H. M. “Mackie`s interpretation of Hume”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185,
1980, p. 19-24.
Thalberg, Irving. “Can we get rid of events? ” Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p.
25-31.
Owen, David W. D. “Actions and bodily movements: another move”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New
Series n. 185, 1980, p. 32-35.
Neumann, Michael. “Killing and average utility”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980,
p. 35-36.
Hinton, J. M. “Phenomenologia specimenism”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p.
37-41.
Wasserman, Wayne. “Chisholm`s definition of the evident”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n.
185, 1980, p. 42-44.
Chernoff, Fred. “Goldman on epistemic conjunction”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185,
1980, p. 45-47.
Welbourne, Michael. “Cartesian madness”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 4849.
Lowe, E. J. “For want of a nail”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 50-52.
Mckie, J.L. “The transitivity of counterfactuals and causation”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series
n. 185, 1980, p. 53-54.
Lowe, Malcom F. “Aristotle on the sea-battle: a clarification”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n.
185, 1980, p. 55-59.
Mellor, D. H. “The self from time to time”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 5962.
Hudson, James and Tye, Michael. “Proper names and definite descriptions with widest possible
scope”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 63-64.
Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980
Harrison, Jonathan. “Report on Analysis problem nº 18”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186,
1980, p. 65-69.
Levin, Margarita R. “Awords`points”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 69-70.
Denruyter, Celine. “Jocasta`s crime: A science-fiction reply”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n.
186, 1980, p. 71.
Godfrey-Smith, William. “Travelling in time”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p.
72-73.
Meyer, Robert K. “Syntactical treatment of negation”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186,
1980, p. 73-78.
Hunter, Geoffrey. “What do the consistency proofs for non-Euclidian geometries prove?”
Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 79-83.
E, Ronal. “Nusenoff: Frege on “possible content of judgement”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series
n. 186, 1980, p. 83-85.
MacIntosh, J. J. “An extension of a proof of Prior`s; of, when thinking makes it so”. Analysis, v.
40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 86-89.
Mackie, J. L. “Truth and knowability”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 90-92.
Barker, John A. “If” and “even if” Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 93-98.
Inwagen, Peter van. “Compatibilism and the burden of proof”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n.
186, 1980, p. 98-100.
Foley, Richard. “Reply to van Inwagen”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 101103.
Stubbs, C. “Bernard Williams and the Cartesian circle”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186,
1980, p. 103-108.
Simon, Robert L. “Rights, Groups and Discriminaton: A reply to Ketchum”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2,
New Series n. 186, 1980, p. 109-112.
Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980
Lowe, E. J. “Peacocke and Kraemer on Butler`s problem”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n.
187, 1980, p. 113-118.
Mayo, Bernard. “Justice, truth and Nozick”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p.
119-123.
Brown, James Robert. “Counting proper classes”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980,
p. 123-126.
Williams, C. “What is, necessarily is, when it is”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980,
p. 127-131.
Hughes, R. “Rationality and intransitive preferences”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187,
1980, p. 132-134.
Bertolet, Rod. “Referential shifts”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p. 135-138.
Kline, David. “Screening-off and temporal asymmetry of explanation”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New
Series n. 187, 1980, p. 139-143.
Ward, Andrew. “Materialism and unity of consciousness”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n.
187, 1980, p. 144-146.
Wreen, Michael. “Counterfeit coins and forged paintings: caveat emptor”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3,
New Series n. 187, 1980, p. 146-151.
Scaltsas, Theodore. “The ship of Theseus”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p. 152157.
Olding. “Frank Jackson and spatial distribution of sense-data”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series
n. 187, 1980, p. 158-162.
Carr, R. “A speech act dilemma”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p. 163-168.
Perkins Jr, R. “McHarry`s theodicy: a reply”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p.
168-171.
Reed, T. M. “Lifesaving”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p. 172-174.
Humberstone, I.L. “You`ll regret if”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 3, New Series n. 187, 1980, p. 175-176.
Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188, 1980
Mott, Peter L. “Haack on fallibilism”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 177-183.
Davis, Wayne A. “Lowe on indicative and counterfactual conditionals”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4,
New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 184-186.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Davis”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 187-190.
Bell, David. “On the translation of Frege`s Bedeutung”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188,
1980, p. 191-195.
Long, Peter and White, Roger. “On the translation of Frege`s Bedeutung: a reply to Dr Bell”.
Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 196-202.
Dale, J. “Mathematical Logic and the substitutional account of entailmen”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4,
New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 203-205.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Tarski and proper classes”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New
Series n. 188, 1980, p. 205-207.
Yu, Paul. “The modal arguments against description theories of names”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4,
New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 208-209.
Holdcroft, David. “Reply to Carr”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 210-211.
McLean, Iain. “Liberty, equality and the Pareto principle: a comment on Weale”. Analysis, v. 40,
n. 4, New Series n. 188, 1980, p. 212-213.
Carr, David. “Propositions negatable in three ways”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n. 188,
1980, p. 214-219.
Anglin, W. S. “Can God create a being he connate control?” Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n.
188, 1980, p. 220-223.
Smith Goldman, Hally. “Killing, letting die, and euthanasia”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 4, New Series n.
188, 1980, p. 224.
Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981
Berresford, Geoffrey C. “A note on Thomson`s lamp “paradox” ”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New
Series n. 189, 1981, p. 1-3.
Elliot, Robert. “How to travel faster than light?” Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981, p.
4-6.
Sayward, Charles. “The tree theory and isomorphism”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189,
1981, p. 6-11.
Weil, Vivian and Thalberg, Irving. “Basic and non-basic actions: “same” or “different”? ”
Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981, p. 12-17.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Reply to Weil and Thalberg”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981,
p. 18-21.
Tye, Michael. “On an objection to the synonymy principle of property identity”. Analysis, v. 41,
n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981, p. 22-26.
Bar-Elli, G. “A note on the substitutivity of notes”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981,
p. 27-32.
Forbe, Graeme. “An anti-essentialist note on substances”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n.
189, 1981, p. 32-37.
Ruben, David-Hillel. “Lewis and the problem of causal sufficiency”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New
Series n. 189, 1981, p. 38-41.
Gallois, Andrè. “Locke on causation, compatibilism and Newcomb`s problem”. Analysis, v. 41,
n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981, p. 42-46.
Meyers, Diana T. “The inevitability of the state”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981,
p. 46-49.
Steiner, Hilliel. “Nozick on Hart on the right to enforce”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189,
1981, p. 50.
Bodanszky, Eva and Conee, Earl. “Isolating intrinsic value”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n.
189, 1981, p. 51-53.
Peetz, Vera. “Imperative inference- an addendum”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189,
1981, p. 54-55.
Robinson, H. M. “Imagination, desire and prescription”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189,
1981, p. 55-59.
Hodson, John D. “Mill, paternalism, and slavery”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981,
p. 60-62.
Geach, P. T. “On a claim of Hare`s”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981, p. 63.
Hare, R. M. “On a misunderstanding of Geach`s”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 1, New Series n. 189, 1981,
p. 64.
Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981
Robinson, Richard. “Begging the question 1981”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981,
p. 65.
Read, Stephen. “What is wrong with disjunctive syllogism?” Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n.
190, 1981, p. 66-70.
Bertolert, Rod. “Kripke`s speaker`s reference”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981, p.
70-72.
Hunter, Graeme and Seager, William. “The discreet charm of counterpart theory”. Analysis, v.
41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981, p. 73-76.
Hess, Peter H. “Actions, Reasons and Humean causes”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190,
1981, p. 77-81.
Ehring, Douglas. “On Mackie`s new account of causal priority”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series
n. 190, 1981, p. 82-83.
Mackie, J. L. “Causal priority and the direction of conditionality”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New
Series n. 190, 1981, p. 84-86.
Anglin, W. S. “Backwards causation”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981, p. 86-91.
Bishop, John “Peacocke on intentional action”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981, p.
92-98.
Chisholm, Roderick M. “Defining intrinsic value”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981,
p. 99-100.
Locke, Don. “Absolutism vs consequentialism: no contest”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n.
190, 1981, p. 101-106.
Kroon, Frederick: “A utilitarian paradox”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 2, New Series n. 190, 1981, p. 107112.
Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981
Mackie, J. L. “Five o`clock on the sun”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 113114.
Tennant, Neil. “Is this a proof see before me?” Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
115-119.
McGinn, Colin. “Reply to Tennant”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 120-122.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Is epistemic preferability transitive?” Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191,
1981, p. 122-123.
Nathan, N.M. L. “On an argument of Peacocke`s about physicalism and counterfactuals”.
Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 124-125.
Lowe, E. J. “All actions occur inside the body”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
126-129.
Hesslow, Germund. “The transitivity of causation”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191,
1981, p. 130-133
Davies, Kim. “The impersonal formulation of the Cogito”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n.
191, 1981, p. 134-137.
Fahrnkopf, Robert. “Descartes, Welbourne, and indubitable beliefs”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New
Series n. 191, 1981, p. 138-140.
Brooks, D. H: M. “Memories and the world”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
141-145.
Bach, Kent “Escaping the speech act dilemma”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
146-149.
Paulsen, David L. “Divine determinateness and the free will defence”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New
Series n. 191, 1981, p. 150-153.
Smith, Peter. “Carr on beliefs and dispositions”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
154-155.
Davies, Kim. “Killing people intentionally, by chance”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191,
1981, p. 156-159.
Foot, Philippa. “Killing, letting die, and euthanasia: a reply to Holly Smith Goldman”. Analysis,
v. 41, n. 3, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 159-160.
Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981
Hochbreg, Herbert. “The Wiener-Kuratowski procedure and the analysis of order”. Analysis, v.
41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 161-163.
Simon, Caroline J. “Plantinga on the essence of essence”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n.
191, 1981, p. 164-167.
Geach, P. T. “Wittgenstein`s operator ‘N’”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
168-170.
Hacking, Ian. “Was there ever a radical mistranslation?” Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191,
1981, p. 171-175.
Hudson, James and Tye, Michael. “Reply to Yu”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981,
p. 176-178.
Wasserman, Wayne. “On Yu on Hudson & Tye”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981,
p. 178-180.
Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Expressions and tokens”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series
n. 191, 1981, p. 181-187.
Slaney, John K. “‘Entailment’ survives Lewy`s paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n.
191, 1981, p. 188-191.
Slater, B. H. “Direct tableaux proofs”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 192-194.
Simons, Peter M. “Brand on event identity”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
195-198.
Casullo, Albert. “Russell on the reduction of particulars”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n.
191, 1981, p. 199-205.
Smith, Peter. “Hess on reasons and causes”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
206-209.
Bryant, Christopher. “Conditional murderers”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
209-215.
Stiffler, Eric. “Butler`s problem again”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p. 216218.
Wilson, Patrick. “Steiner on Nozick on the right to enforce”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n.
191, 1981, p. 219-221.
Miller, David. “Steiner on rights and powers”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series n. 191, 1981, p.
222-223.
Kirk, Robert E. “A negation-free version of the Berry paradox”. Analysis, v. 41, n. 4, New Series
n. 191, 1981, p. 223-224.
Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982
Smart, J. J. C. “Metaphysical realism”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 1-3.
Noonan, Harold W. “Vague objects”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 3-6.
Davies, Martin. “Sentence modifiers and semantic theories: a note on a conjecture”. Analysis, v.
42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 7-11.
Cusmariu, Arnold. “Translation and belief”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 1216.
Davies, Kim. “The concept of experience and Strawson`s transcendental deduction”. Analysis, v.
42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 16-19.
Millican, P. J. R. “Mackie`s defence of induction”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982,
p. 19-24.
Moloney, Michael J. “Chisholm`s objection to phenomenalism”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series
n. 192, 1982, p. 25-26.
Lowe, E. J. “The paradox of the 1,001 cats”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 2730.
Geach, P. T. “Reply to Lowe”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 30.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Geach”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 31.
Geach, P. T. “Reply to Lowe`s reply”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p. 32.
Forbes, Graeme. “Canonical counterpart theory”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982,
p. 33-37.
Grim, Patrick. “What won`t escape sorites arguments”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192,
1982, p. 38-43.
Brennan, Andrew. Personal identity and personal survival”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n.
192, 1982, p. 44-50.
Ray, Christopher. “Can we travel faster than light?” Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192,
1982, p. 50-52.
Tye, Michael. “A note on the synonymy principle of property identity. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New
Series n. 192, 1982, p. 52-55.
Conee, Earl. “Utilitarianism and rationality”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192, 1982, p.
55-59.
Honderich, Ted. “The argument for anomalous monism”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 1, New Series n. 192,
1982, p. 59-64.
Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982
Hurka, T. M. “Average utilitarianisms”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 65-69.
Slote, Michael. “Is virtue possible?” Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 70-76.
King, Jeffrey. “Five o’clock on the sun”: a reply to J. L. Mackie. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series
n. 193, 1982, p. 77.
Angene, Lyle E. “Five o`clock here”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 78-79.
Godwin, William. “Analysis and the identity of indescernibles”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series
n. 193, 1982, p. 80-82.
More, M. J. “Rigidity and identity across possible worlds”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n.
193, 1982, p. 83-84.
Lowe, E. J. “Intentionality and intuition: a reply to Davies”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n.
193, 1982, p. 85.
Welbourne, Michael. “My body and I-a reply to Fahrnkopf”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n.
193, 1982, p. 86-88.
Milllican, P. J. R. “On the transitivity of epistemic preferability”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New
Series n. 193, 1982, p. 88-90.
Nathan, N. M. L. “Conscious belief”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 90-93.
Prior, Elizabeth W. “The dispositional/categorical distinction”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series
n. 193, 1982, p. 93-96.
Mellor, D. H. “Counting corners correctly”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 9697.
Steiner, Hillel. “Vanishing power: a reply to Miller and Wilson”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New
Series n. 193, 1982, p. 97-98.
Keating, B. F. “Rowe, self-existence, and the cosmological argument”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New
Series n. 193, 1982, p. 99-102.
Carter, W. R. “Omnipotence and sin”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 102-105.
Montmarquet, James A. “Causal deviancy and multiple intentions”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New
Series n. 193, 1982, p. 106-110.
Gottlieb, J. “Imperceptible parts”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 2, New Series n. 193, 1982, p. 111-113.
Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p.
“Problem nº 19: Analysis competition”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 115.
Hurka, T. M. “More average utilitarianisms”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p.
115-119.
Smith, Peter. “In defence of Lewy”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 119-124.
Fogelin, Robert J. “Wittgenstein`s operator N”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p.
124-127.
Geach, P. T. “More on Wittgenstein`s operator N”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982,
p. 127-128.
Hazen, Allen. “On a possible misinterpretation of Kripke`s semantics for intuitionistic logic”.
Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 128-133.
Baldwin, Thomas. “Sets whose members might not exist”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n.
194, 1982, p. 133-138.
Grayling, C.” Internal structure and essence”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p.
139-140.
Over, D. E. “Predicative and constructive knowledge”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194,
1982, p. 140-146.
Stahl, Donald E. “Goldman on what justifies belief”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194,
1982, p. 146-149.
Ehring, Dougals. “Manipulability theory and event types”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n.
194, 1982, p. 149-151.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Reply to Lowe on actions”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p.
152.
Ward, Andrew. “Materialism and memory”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p.
153-157.
Nognan, Harold W. “Williams on “The Self and the Future” Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n.
194, 1982, p. 158-163.
Barnes, Gerald W. “Mince pie reasoning”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 163169.
Grim, Patrick. “Intentionality: spontaneous ascription and deep intuition”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3,
New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 169-171.
Davies, Kim. “Against a deontic argument for God`s existence”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series
n. 194, 1982, p. 171-174.
Lowe, E. J. “On being a cat”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3, New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 174-177.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “A thesis refutable by a sentence verifiable by its use”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 3,
New Series n. 194, 1982, p. 177-178.
Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982
Jackson, Frank and Humberstone, Lloyd. “On a challenge by Anderson and Belnap”. Analysis, v.
42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982, p. 179-181.
Miller, Barry. “Negative existential propositions”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982,
p. 181-188.
Williams, C. J. F. “Reply to Miller”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982, p. 189-190.
Dale, J. “Logical equivalents and logical form”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982, p.
190-194.
Simons, Peter M. “Token resistance”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982, p. 195-203.
Williamson, T. “Intuitionism disproved?”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982, p. 203207.
Rasmussen, Stig Alstrup. “Ruben on Lewis and causal sufficiency”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New
Series n. 195, 1982, p. 207-211.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Knowing, believing, and guessing”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195,
1982, p. 212.
Elliot, Robert. “Going nowhere fast?”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982, p. 213-215.
Taylor, Denise Meyerson. “Actions, reasons and causal explanation”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New
Series n. 195, 1982, p. 216-219.
Smith, Peter. “Bad news for anomalous monism?”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195, 1982,
p. 220-224.
Seager, William and Hunter, Graeme. “Reply to Forbes”. Analysis, v. 42, n. 4, New Series n. 195,
1982, p.224-226.
Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983
Erratum. 1.
Hazen, Allen. “An example of alanguage with calssical logia for which bivalente cannot be
assumed”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 1-5.
Savigny, Eike V. “Sentence meaning irreductible to use even within a use-theoretical
framework”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 5-11.
Sainsbury, R. M. “On a Fregeean argument for the sisticness of sense and reference”. Analysis, v.
43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 12-14.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Subjective probability and indifference”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n.
197, 1983, p. 15.
Dale, J. “Smith`s defence of Lewy”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 16-17.
Millar, Barry. “Cambridge properties and defunct individuals: a reply to C. J. F. Williams”.
Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 17-19.
Charlton, William “Distance”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 19-23.
Cusmariu, Arnold. “Translation and belief again”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983,
p. 23-25.
Maloney, J. Christopher. “Drretske on knowledge and information”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New
Series n. 197, 1983, p. 25-28.
Martin, Raymond. “Tracking Nozick`s sceptic: a better method”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New
Series n. 197, 1983, p. 28-33.
Kavka, Gregory S. “The toxin puzzle”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 33-36.
Hollis, Martin. “Jim and the Indians”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 36-39.
Taylor, C. C. W. “A note on ancient attitudes towards slavery”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series
n. 197, 1983, p. 39.
Gensler, Harry J. “Actino commits one to ethical beliefs”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n.
197, 1983, p. 40-43.
Persson, Ingmar “Hare on universal prescriptivism and utilitarianism”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New
Series n. 197, 1983, p. 43-49.
Hoag, Robert W. “Mill on conflicting maoral obligations”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n.
197, 1983, p. 49-54.
Broughton, Lynne M. “Human reproduction: a self-defeating strategy”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New
Series n. 197, 1983, p. 54-58.
Green, Leslie “Dictators and democrafies”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983, p. 5859.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Hume`s scepticism concerning reports of miracles”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New
Series n. 197, 1983, p. 60.
Rowe, William L. “Self-existence and the cosmological argument”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New
Series n. 197, 1983, p. 61-62.
Gordon, David. “Paulsen on the free will defence”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 1, New Series n. 197, 1983,
p. 63-64.
Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p.
Basu, Dilip K. “Russell on denoting”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p. 65-70.
Helme, Mark. “Frege`s “beurtheilbarer Inhalt”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p.
70-72.
Sengupta, Gautam. “On identifying reference with truth-value”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series
n. 198, 1983, p. 72-74.
Smith, Peter. “Smart`s argument for realism”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p.
74-78
Garrett, B. J. “Grayling on internal structure”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p.
78-80.
Taylor, Paul. “McGinn, token physicalism, anf a rejoinder of Woodfield”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2,
New Series n. 198, 1983, p. 80-83.
Harrison, Jonathan. “Against quantum logic”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p.
83-85.
Over, D. E. “Effective and non-effective reference”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198,
1983, p. 85-91.
George I. Mavrodes: “Vestigial modalities”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p. 9194.
Irving, Andrew D. “Lucas, Lewis, and mechanism – one more time”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New
Series n. 198, 1983, p. 94-97.
Noonan, Harold W. “Personal identity and Bodily continuity: a further note on “The self and
future” 98-104.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Steiner`s vanishing powers”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p.
105-106.
Morris, Thomas V. “Impeccability”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 2, New Series n. 198, 1983, p. 106-112.
Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. FALTA AÑO
Radford, Colin. “Reporto n Análisis problem Nº. 19”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p.
113-115.
Haldane, John J. “A bening regress”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 115-116.
Garrett, B. J. “Identical truth-conditions”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 117-118.
Jennings, Richard C. “Popper, Tarski and relativism”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p.
118-123.
Forbes, Graeme. “Actuality and context dependence I”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199,
p. 123-1258.
Davies, Martin “Actuality and context dependence II”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p.
128-133.
White, Alan R. “Doubting one`s methods”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 133-134.
Wright, Crispin. “Keeping track of Nozick”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 134-140.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Hornsby on actions”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 140-141.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Events that are causings: a response to Lowe”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New
Series n. 199, p. 141-142.
Smith, Michael “Actions, attempts and internal events”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199,
p. 142-145.
Liston, Michael. “Mr More on rigidity and identity”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p.
146-147.
Honderch, Ted. “Anomalous monism: reply to Smith”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p.
147-149.
Forbes, Graeme. “More on counterpart theory”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 149152.
Gordon, Jeffrey. “Is naturalism inescapable?” Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n. 199, p. 153155.
Kroon, Fred. “Rationality and paradox: a reply to Conee”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 3, New Series n.
199, p. 156-160.
Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. , FALTAN AÑOS
Abbott, W. R. “A note on Grim`s sorites argument”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p.
161-164.
Grim, Patrick. “Is this a swizzle stick which I se befote me?” Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n.
200, p. 164-166.
Pokriefka, M. L. “Ayer`s definition of empirical significance revisited”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4,
New Series n. 200, p. 166-170.
Grover, Dorothy. “Berr`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. 170-176.
Weir, Alan. “Truth conditions and truth values”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. 176180.
Garrett, B. J. “Nozick on knowledge”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. 181-184.
Levy, Donald. “Post-hypnotic sugestión and the existente of unconscious mental activity”.
Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. 184-189.
Tiles, J. E. “Pettit on revising our understanding of individuals”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series
n. 200, p. 189-193.
Barnes, Gerald W. “The conclusión of practical reasoning”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n.
200, p. 193-199.
Dosen, K. “Is it good to make others do something good?” Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n.
200, p. 199-201.
Andre, Judith. “Ángel, Williams and moral luck”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p.
202-207.
Thomas, Janice. “The toxin, the blood donor and the bomb”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n.
200, p. 207-210.
Dupré, John. “Human reproduction and sociobiology”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p.
210-212.
Bigelow, John C. and Prior, Elizabeth W. “The coherente of the double Standard”. Analysis, v.
43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. 212-217.
Scarre, Geoffrey. “What was Hume`s worry about personal identity?” Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New
Series n. 200, p. 217-221.
Mayo, Bernard. “Conjectures and modalities”. Analysis, v. 43, n. 4, New Series n. 200, p. 221224.
Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984
Goldstein, Lawrence. “Quotation of types and other types of quotation”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1,
New Series n. 201, 1984, p. 1-6.
Broome, John. “Indefiniteness in identity”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984, p. 612.
King, Jeffrey and Liston, Michael. “Explainig Donnellan`s distincition”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1,
New Series n. 201, 1984, p. 13-14.
Williams, C. J. W. “Comparatives”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984, p. 15-16.
Morton, Adam. “Comparatives and degrees”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984, p.
16-20.
Williams, C. J. F. “Comment”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984, p. 20.
Morre, W. “Posible worlds and diagonalization”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984,
p. 21-22.
Lockwood, Michael. “Einstein and the identity theory”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201,
1984, p. 22-25.
Butterfield, Jeremy. “On spurioys egocentricity”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984,
p. 25-29.
Gordon, David. “Knowledge, reliable methods, and Nozick”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n.
201, 1984, p. 30-33.
Millican, P. J. R. “Probability: subjective and mathematical”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n.
201, 1984, p. 33-37.
Dartnall, Ferry. “Knowledge and non-accidental guessing”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n.
201, 1984, p. 38-41.
Sorensen, Roy A. “The importance of being completely wrong”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series
n. 201, 1984, p. 41-43.
Johnson, Fred “Trees for a 3-valued logia”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201, 1984, p. 4346.
Geach, M. C. “The effects of principles and of actions”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 1, New Series n. 201,
1984, p. 46-48.
Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984
Dense, Theodore C. “On the nature of INUS conditionality”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n.
202, 1984, p. 49-52.
Gordon, David. “Anscombe on comino into existence and causation”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New
Series n. 202, 1984, p. 52-54.
Chandler, Hugo S. “Theseus`clothes-pin”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 5558.
McIntyre, Jane. “Putnam`s brains”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 59-61.
Hallam, Nicholas. “An argument in favour of non-classical logia for queantum theory”. Analysis,
v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 61-64.
Gibbins, P. F. “Why the distributive law is sometimes false”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n.
202, 1984, p. 64-67.
Dobrosavijevic, Stojan T. “A puzzle about logical equivalent”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series
n. 202, 1984, p. 67-69.
McGinn, Marie “Wright`s reply to Benacerraf”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p.
69-72.
McMichael, Alan “Why physics can’t be nominalized”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202,
1984, p. 72-78.
McJaughton, David “McGinn on experience of primary and secondary qualities”. Analysis, v. 44,
n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 78-80.
Richard, Maurice. “A note on Smith on attempts and internal events”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New
Series n. 202, 1984, p. 81-82.
Smith, Peter. “Anomalous monism and epiphenomenalism: a reply to Honderich”. Analysis, v.
44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 83-86.
Honderich, Ted. “Smith and the champion of Maule”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202,
1984, p. 86-89.
Dale, J. “Hempel revisited”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 90-92.
Pokriefka, M. L. “More on empirical significance”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202,
1984, p. 92-93.
Lyons, William. “The tigre and his stripes”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202, 1984, p. 9395.
Gordon, David. “Green on dictators and democracies”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 2, New Series n. 202,
1984, p. 95-96.
Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984
“Problem Nº 20: “Analysis competition”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p. 97.
Tennant, Neil. “Were those disproof’s Saw before me?” Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203,
1984, p. 97-105.
Rasmussen, Stig Alstrup. “Sainsbury on a Fregean argument”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n.
203, 1984, p. 106-111.
R. M. Sainsbury: “Rejoinder to Rasmussen”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p.
111-113.
Salmon, Nathan. “Impossible worlds”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p. 114-117.
Noonan, H. W. “Indefinite identity: a reply to Broome”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203,
1984, p. 117-121.
Dancy, Jonathan. “On the tracks of the sceptic”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p.
121-126.
Gordon, David. “Special relativity and the location of mental events”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New
Series n. 203, 1984, p. 126-127.
Lockowood, Michael. “Reply to Gordon”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p. 127128.
Lee, Richard. “Preference and transitivity”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p. 129134.
Brueckner, Anthony L. “Putnam`s model-theoretic argument against metaphysical realism”.
Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p. 134-140.
Kraemer, Eric Russert. “Phenomenalism and observation conditions”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New
Series n. 203, 1984, p. 140-143.
Pokriefka, M. L. “On making others do good.” Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p.
143-144.
“Correction”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 3, New Series n. 203, 1984, p. 144.
Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984
Dudman, V. H. “Parsing “if”-sentences”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 145153.
MacIntonsh, J. J. “Fitch`s factives”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 153-158.
Conway, David A. “It would have happened already”: on one argument for a first cause”.
Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 159-166.
Russell, Paul. “Sorabji and the dilemma of determinism”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n.
204, 1984, p. 166-172.
McCall, Storrs. “A dynamic model of temporal becoming”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n.
204, 1984, p. 172-176.
Forrest, Peter. “Is motion change of location?” Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p.
177-178.
Clark, Michael. “Degrees of comparison”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 178180.
Lowe, E. J. “Wright versus Lewis on the transitivity of counterfactuals”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4,
New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 180-183.
Wright, Crispin. “Comment on Lowe”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 183-185.
Dale, J. “INUS conditions”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 186-188.
Buckner, D. K. “Goldstein on quotation”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 189190.
Over, D. E. “Explaining Donnelllan`s distinction-a reply”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n.
204, 1984, p. 191-194.
Garrett, B. J. “Nozick and knowledge- a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204,
1984, p. 194-196.
Lowe, E. J. “A note on a response of Hornsby`s”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984,
p. 196-197.
Spinks, Graham. “McGinn on Benacerraf”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 197198.
McLaughlin, Robert. “Necessary agnosticism?” Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p.
198-202.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Cause in perception: a note on Seale`s Intentionality”. Analysis, v. 44, n.
4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p. 203-205.
Hollis, Martin. “A paradoxical train of thought”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p.
205-206.
Grimm, Patrick. “There is no set of all truths”. Analysis, v. 44, n. 4, New Series n. 204, 1984, p.
206-208.
Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n. 205, 1985
Copeland, B. J. “Substitutional quantification and existence”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n.
205, 1985, p. 1-4.
Noonan, H. W. “Wiggins, artefac identity and “best candidate” theories”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1,
New Series n. 205, 1985, p. 4-8.
Goldstein, Laurence. “The paradox of the liar – a case of mistaken identity”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1,
New Series n. 205, 1985, p. 9-13.
Moore, W. “Set theory, Skolem`s paradox and the Tractatus”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n.
205, 1985, p. 13-20.
Kirk, Robert. “Davidson and indeterminacy of translation”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n.
205, 1985, p. 20-23.
Burke, Michael B. “Spatial analogues of “annihilation and re-creation”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New
Series n. 205, 1985, p. 24-29.
Moore, F. C. T. “The martyr`s dilemma”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n. 205, 1985, p. 29-33.
Wasserman, Wayne “What is a fundamental ethical disgreement?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New
Series n. 205, 1985, p. 34-39.
Hugly, Philip and Saywarf, Charles. “Is moral relativism consistent?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New
Series n. 205, 1985, p. 40-44.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. “ “Ought to have” and “could have” ”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New
Series n. 205, 1985, p. 44-48.
Waller, Bruce N. “Deliberating about the inevitable”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n. 205,
1985, p. 48-52.
Carter, W. R. “Impeccability revisited”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n. 205, 1985, p. 52-55.
Read, Stephen and Wright, Crispin. “Hairier than Putnam thought”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New
Series n. 205, 1985, p. 56-58.
Hazen, Allen. “McGinn`s reply to Wright`s reply to Benacerraf”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New
Series n. 205, 1985, p. 59-61.
Clark, J. “Why Kant couldn’t be an anti-realist”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series n. 205, 1985, p.
61-63.
Bringskord, Selmer. “Are there set theoretic possible worlds?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, New Series
n. 205, 1985, p. 64.
Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985
Hazen, Allen. “Nominalism and abstract entities”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985,
p. 65-68.
Weir, Alan. “Rejoinder to Tenant”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p. 68-72.
Brackel, J. van. “Buckner quoting Goldstein and Davidson on quotation”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2,
New Series n. 206, 1985, p. 73-75.
Siegel, Harvey. “Tarski a relativist?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p.75-76.
Rasmussen, Sitg Alstrup. “Sainsbury on denying a Fregean conclusion”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2,
New Series n. 206, 1985, p. 77-79.
Noonan, H. W. “The only x and y principle”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p.
79-83.
Cain, James. “Some radical consequences of Geach`s logical theories”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New
Series n. 206, 1985, p. 83-88.
Kekkedy, Ralph “Lemmon on logical relations”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p.
89-93.
Lowe, E. J. “If A and B, then A.” Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p. 93-98.
Ehring, Douglas. “Similtaneous causation and causal chains”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n.
206, 1985, p. 98-102.
Brueckner, Anthony L. “Losing track of the sceptic”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206,
1985, p. 103-104.
Madell, Geoffre. “Derek Parfit and Greta Garbo”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985,
p. 105-109.
Radford, Colin. “The umpire`s dilemma”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p. 105111.
Swank, Casey. “Reasons, dilemmas and logic on “ought” ”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n.
206, 1985, p. 111-116.
Hardin, C. L. “A transparent case for subjectivism”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206,
1985, p. 117-119.
Millar, Alan. “Veridicality: more on Sealte”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p.
120-124.
Green, Leslie. “What is a dictator?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 2, New Series n. 206, 1985, p. 125-128.
Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985
Cohen, Jonathan. “A problem about ambiguity in truth-theoretical semantics”. Analysis, v. 45, n.
3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p. 129-134.
Sorensen, Roy A. “An argument for the vagueness of vague”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n.
207, 1985, p. 134-137.
Goldstein, Laurence. “The little of this paper is “quotation”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n.
207, 1985, p. 137-140.
Chandler, Hugh S. “Indeterminate people”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p. 141145.
Gibbins, P. F. “Are mental events in space-time?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985,
p. 145-147.
Lockwood, Michael. “Einstein, Gibbins and the unity of time”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series
n. 207, 1985, p. 148-150.
Noonan, H. W. “A note on temporal parts”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p.
151-152.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. “Swain on the basing relation”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207,
1985, p. 153-158.
Olding. “Short on teleology” Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p. 158-161.
Inwagen, Peter van. “On two arguments for compatibilism”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n.
207, 1985, p. 161-163.
Bishop, John. “Causal deviancy and multiple intentions: a reply to James Montamrquet”.
Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p. 163-168.
Simpson, Paul. “Lyons and tigers”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p. 169-171.
Primorac, Igor. “Hare on moral conflicts”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p. 171175.
Garrett, B. J. “A note on substance concepts”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 3, New Series n. 207, 1985, p.
176.
Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985
Hollis, Martin. “Report on analysis problem nº 20”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208,
1985, p. 177-178.
Knorpp, William. “Thoughtcrime”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 178-179.
Dale, J. “Is the future unreasonable?” Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 179-183.
Dudman, V. H. “Thinking about the future”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p.
183-186.
Ivor Alexander: “ ‘If`’ and quantification”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 186190.
Dau, Paolo. “The complex matter on denoting”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p.
190-197.
Vision, Gerald. “I am here now”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 198-199.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Wright on conditionals and transitivity”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series
n. 208, 1985, p. 200-202.
Putnam, Hilary. “a quick Read is a wrong Wright”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985,
p. 203.
Harrison, Jonathan. “Distribution, superposition and quantum logic”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New
Series n. 208, 1985, p. 204-207.
Tennant, Niel. “Weir and those “disproofs” I saw before me”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n.
208, 1985, p. 208-212.
Garrett, B. J. “Noonan, “best candidate” theories and the ship of Theseus”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4,
New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 212-215.
Bckner, D. K. “Reply to van Brakel”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 215-217.
Gordon, David. “Green and dictators revisited”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p.
217-218.
Morris, Thomas V. “Agnosticism”. Analysis, v. 45, n. 4, New Series n. 208, 1985, p. 219-224.
Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986
Wagner, Steven J. “Quine`s holism”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986, p. 1-6.
Noonan, Harold W. “Relative identity: a reconsideration”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n.
209, 1986, p. 6-10.
Linsky, Bernard. “Factives, blindspots and some paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n.
209, 1986, p. 10-15.
Over, D. E. “On a temporal slippery slope paradox”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 15-18.
Olin, Doris. “On a paradoxical train on thought”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986,
p. 18-20.
Kinghan, Michael. “A paradox derailed: reply to Hollis”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 20-24.
Schlesingger, George N. “On the limits of science”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 24-26.
Dale, J. “Thing statements and appearance statements”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 26-28.
Naylor, Margery Bedford. “A note on David Lewis`s realism about possible worlds”. Analysis, v.
46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986, p. 28-29.
Bassham, Gregory. “Ehring`s theory of causal asymmetry”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n.
209, 1986, p. 29-32.
Ehring, Douglas. “Closed causal loops, single causes, and asymmetry”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New
Series n. 209, 1986, p. 33-35.
Melchert, Noeman. “Metaphysical realism and history”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 36-38.
Pettit, Philip. “A priori principles and action-explanation”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n.
209, 1986, p. 39-45.
Peacocke, Christopher. “Intention and practical reasoning: a reply to Donald Davidson”.
Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986, p. 45-49.
Montmarquet, James. “The voluntariness of belief”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 49-53.
L. N: Zoch: “Remorse and regret: a reply to Phillips and Price”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series
n. 209, 1986, p. 54-57.
Fischer, John Martin. “Pike`s Ockhamism”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986, p. 5763.
McGrath, P.J. “Evil and the existence of a finite God”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209,
1986, p. 63-64.
Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986
Buckne, Dean and Smith, Peter. “Quotation and the Liar Parodox”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New
Series n. 210, 1986, p. 65-67.
Menzel, Christopher. “On set theoretic possible worlds”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210,
1986, p. 68-72.
Tienson, John. “An observation on common names and proper names”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New
Series n. 210, 1986, p. 73-76.
Slater, B. H. “Prior`s analytic”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 76-81.
Dale, J. “If A and B then A”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 81-83.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Dale”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 83-85.
Bckner, D. K. “Transparently false: reply to Hardin”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210,
1986, p. 86-87.
Noonan, H. W. “AE or EA?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 87-89.
Costa, Michael J. “Hume`s argument for the temporal priority cause over effect”. Analysis, v. 46,
n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 89-92.
Thalebrg, Irving. “The immateriality of “abstract objects” and the mental”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2,
New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 93-97.
Newton, Natika. “Churchland on direct introspection of brain states”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New
Series n. 210, 1986, p. 97-102.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Nozick, justice, and the sorites”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210,
1986, p. 102-106.
Leaman, Oliver. “Harris on noon-vicious choice”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986,
p. 106-107.
Duff, Antonym. “Pascal`s wger anf infinite utilities”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210,
1986, p. 107-109.
Rein, Andrew. “Repeatable miracles?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 109-112.
Correction. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 112.
Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986
Williamson, Timothy. “The contingent a priori: has it anything to do with indexicals?” Analysis,
v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 113-117.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p.
117-121.
Williams, S. G. “On the logical possibility of time without change”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New
Series n. 211, 1986, p. 122-125.
Denise, Theofore C. “Redundancy and INUS conditionality”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n.
211, 1986, p. 126-130.
Jacobson, Anne Jaap. “Causality and the supposed counterfactual conditional in Hume`s
Enquiry”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 131-133.
Waters, Kenneth. “Why Chisholm`s analysis of justification won`t do”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New
Series n. 211, 1986, p. 134-137.
Lemke, Lorry. “Kvanvig and Swain on the basing relation”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n.
211, 1986, p. 138-144.
Costa, Michael J. “Acting intentionally and minimal abilities”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series
n. 211, 1986, p. 144-147.
Montamquet, James. “Prosthesis and pre-emption”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211,
1986, p. 147-152.
White, Alan R. “Ways of speaking of imagination”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211,
1986, p. 152-156.
Smith, Peter. “Metaphysical realism and historical interpretation”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New
Series n. 211, 1986, p. 157-158.
Lowe, E. J. “Noonan on naming and predicating”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986,
p. 159.
Crisp, Roger. “The avoidance of the problem of evil: a reply to McGrath”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3,
New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 160.
Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986
Alexander, Peter and others. “Open letter to the international philosophical community”.
Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 161.
Priest, Graham. “Tense and truth conditions”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p.
162-166.
Mellor, D. H. “Tense`s tenseless truth conditions”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986,
p. 167-172.
Moore, W. “How significant is the use/mention distinction?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n.
212, 1986, p. 173-179.
Cook, Monte. “Indeterminacy of identity”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 179186.
Grim, Patrick. “On sets and worlds: a reply to Menzel”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212,
1986, p. 186-191.
Goldstein, Laurence. “False stipulation and semantical paradox”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New
Series n. 212, 1986, p. 192-194.
Lowe, E. J. “On a supposed temporal/modal parallel”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212,
1986, p. 195-197.
Over, D. E. “Is there a temporal slippery slope paradox?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212,
1986, p. 197-200.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Over”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 200.
Over, D. E. “Reply to Lowe”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 201.
Jennings, Richard C. “Tarski - an ambiguity”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p.
201-205.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Garrett”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 205211.
Shand, John. “Grayling, Feyerabend and the constancy of sense”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New
Series n. 212, 1986, p. 211-212.
Sanford, David H. “The possibility of transparent white”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212,
1986, p. 212-215.
Spinks, Graham. Noonan on temporal parts. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p.
215-216.
Hollis, Martin. “More paradoxical epistemics”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p.
217-218
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Lowe”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 218-221.
Clark, Andy. “Superman, the image”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 222-224.
“Correction”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 224.
Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987
Davies, David. “How not to out Smart the anti-realist”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213,
1987, p. 1-8.
Pettit, Philip. “Rights, constraints and trumps”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p.
8-14.
Cummiskey, David. “Desert and entitlement: a Rawlsian consequentialist account”. Analysis, v.
47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 15-19.
Gillett, G. R. “The generality constraint and conscious thought”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series
n. 213, 1987, p. 20-24.
Helm, Paul. “On pan-critical irrationalism”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 2428.
Ehring, Douglas. “Non-simultaneous causation”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987,
p. 28-32.
Rasmussen, Stig Alstrup. “Causal sufficiency reconsidered”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n.
213, 1987, p. 32-34.
Ruben, David-Hillel. “Explaining contrastive facts”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213,
1987, p. 35-37.
Widerker, David. “On an argument for incompatibilism”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213,
1987, p. 37-41.
Hooker, Brad. “Williams` argument against external reasons”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n.
213, 1987, p. 42-44.
Lowe, E. J. “Not a counterexample to modus ponens”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213,
1987, p. 44-47.
Bodanszky, Eva. “Parfit on selves and their interests”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213,
1987, p. 47-50.
Enring, Douglas. “Survival and trivial facts”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p.
50-54.
McGrath, P. J. “Atheism or agnosticism”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 5457.
Burk, Michael B. “Theodicy with a God of limited power: a reply to McGrath”. Analysis, v. 47,
n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 57-58.
Colterjohn, Julia and MacIntosh, Duncan. “Gerald Vision and indexicals”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1,
New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 58-60.
Sipmson, Paul. Here and now. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p.58-60.
Sturgeon, Scott. “Foley on causation and rationality”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213,
1987, p. 62-64.
Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO
Editorial. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 65
Patton, Thomas E. “On a persistent fallacy regarding the de re”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series
n. 214, AÑO, p. 65-71.
Blacksburn, William K. “Davidson on force and convention”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n.
214, AÑO, p. 72-74.
Dudman, V. H. “Apiah on “if””. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 74-79.
Tsohatzidis, Savas L. “Deontic trouble in speech act botany”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n.
214, AÑO, p. 80-83.
Sayward, Charles. “Prior`s theory of truth”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 8387.
Hochberg, Herbert. “Quantification, description, and identity”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series
n. 214, AÑO, p. 87-92.
Englebrestsen, George. “Morris on identity”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p.
92-93.
Lamrque, Peter. “The puzzle of the flash stockeman: a reply to David Lewis”. Analysis, v. 47, n.
2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 93-95.
Broackes, Justin. “Thoughts and definitions”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p.
95-100.
Rea, George. “How many minds has a tredecim?” Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO,
p. 100-102.
Williams, C. “Knowledge, belief and existence”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO,
p. 103-110.
Nathan, N. “Evidential insatiability”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 110-115.
Leon, Mark. “Solipsism regained”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 116-120.
Wreen, Michale. “Two “by” ways”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 120-124.
Vision, Gerald. “Antiphon”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 124-128.
Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO
Hunt, G. “Determinism, predictability and chaos”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO,
p. 129-133.
Elliot, Robert. “Moral realism and the modal argument”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215,
AÑO, p. 133-137.
Lee, Richard. “Williams, ought, and logical form”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215,
AÑO, p. 137-142.
Over, D. E. “Assumptions and the supposed counterexamples to modus ponen”s. Analysis, v. 47,
n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 142-146.
Forbes, Graeme. “Free and classical counterparts: response to Lewis”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New
Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 147-152.
Lowe, E. J. “Lewis on perdurance versus endurance”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215,
AÑO, p. 152-154.
Williamson, Timothy. “On Knowledge and the unknowable”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n.
215, AÑO, p. 154-158.
Kennedy, Ralph. “Salmon versus Kripke on the a priori”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215,
AÑO, p. 158-161.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. “On Lemke`s defence of a causal basing requirement”. 162-167.
Montmarquet, James. “A first-person asymmetry”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO,
p. 167-170.
Rasmussen, Sitg Alstrup. “Sense, reference, and meaning-incommesurability”. Analysis, v. 47, n.
3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 170-173.
Rockingham Gill, R. R. “Frege on infinite axiom-systems”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n.
215, AÑO, p. 173-175.
Cahn, Steven M. “A puzzle concerning divestiture”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215,
AÑO, p. 175-176.
Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO
Clark, Michael. “The truth about heaps”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 177179.
Schawartz, Stephen P. “Intuitionism and sorites”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO,
p. 179-183.
Pirest, Graham. “Tense, tense and TENSE”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p.
184-187.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Spinks on temporal parts”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216,
AÑO, p. 187-188.
Oppy, Graham. “Williamson and contingent a priori”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216,
AÑO, p. 188-193.
Appiah, Anthony. ““If” again”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 193-199.
Teichmann, Roger. “Tu quoque”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 199-201.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Noonan”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 201-203.
Garrett, B. J. “A further reply to Noonan”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 204206.
Lipton, Peter. “A real contrast”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 207-208.
Ehring, Douglas. “Compound emphasis and causal relata”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n.
216, AÑO, p. 209-213.
Loui, R. P. “Nozick`s acceptance rule and the lottery paradox”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series
n. 216, AÑO, p. 213-215.
Doris Olin: “On an epistemic paradox”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 216217.
Rea, George. “A variation on Hollis` paradox”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p.
218-220.
White, Alan R. “Visualizing and imagining seeing”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216,
AÑO, p. 221-224.
Brennan, Andrew A. “Survival and importance”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO,
p. 225-230.
Gale, Richard M. “Parfit`s arguments against partially relativized theories of rationality”.
Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 230-236.
McGrath, P. J. “Children of a lesser God? A reply to Burke and Grisp”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New
Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 236-238.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Reply to Wreen”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 238.
White, Alan R. ““By” and “by””. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 239-240.
Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO
Editorial. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p.1
Lewis, David. “Ayer`s first empiricist criterion of meaning: Why does it Fail?” Analysis, v. 48, n.
1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 1-3.
Hunter, Geoffrey. “Is consistency enough for existence in mathematics?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1,
New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 3-5.
Rice, D. H. ““Exist” and two types of quantification”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 5-9.
Levin, Michael. “On an argument of Armstrong against Nominalism”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New
Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 9-12.
Sharlow, Mark F. “Lewis`s modal realism: a rely to Naylor”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n.
217, AÑO, p. 13-15.
Gjelsvik, Olav. “A note on objects and events”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p.
15-17.
Watkins, John. “The pragmatic problem of induction”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 18-20.
Double, Richard. “Fear of sphexisheness”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 2025.
Seidel, Asher. “Searle on the biological basis of cognition”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n.
217, AÑO, p. 26-28.
Siderits, Mark. “Ehring on Parfit`s relation R”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p.
29-32.
Fleming, Noel. “Why is there something rather than nothing?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series
n. 217, AÑO, p. 32-35.
Nathan, N. M. L. “Explicability and the unpreventable”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 36-40.
Charlton, William. “Mary Mothersill on aesthetic pleasure”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n.
217, AÑO, p. 40-44.
Mellema, Gregory. “Causation, foresight and collective responsibility”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New
Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 44-50.
David Gordon: “Clark on tracing mental images”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO,
p. 50-51.
Bringsjord, Selmer. “Tracing Superman again: a reply to Clark”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series
n. 217, AÑO, p. 52-54.
Clark, Andy. “Superman and duck/rabbit: a reply to Gordon Bringsjord”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1,
New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 54-57.
Simmons, Howard “Nathan on evidential insatiability”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 57-59.
McArthur, Robert P. “Nathan on global justification”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 60-61.
Flint, Thomas P. “Williams on what the president knew”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 61-63.
Williams, C. J. F. “How much did the president know?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217,
AÑO, p. 64.
Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO
Cohen, L. Jonathan “Are inductions warranted?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO,
p. 1-4.
Mellor, D. H. “Induction is warranted”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 5-7.
Cohen, L. Jonathan “What use are belief that we do not take to be warranted?” Analysis, v. 49, n.
1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 7-8.
Gower, Barry. “Corroboration versus borrocoration”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221,
AÑO, p. 8-10.
Milne, Peter. “Schlesinger on justified belief and probability”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n.
221, AÑO, p. 11-16.
Clark, Michael. “A paradox of conditional probability”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221,
AÑO, p. 16-20.
Denyer, Nichola.“The principle of harmony”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p.
21-22.
Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Ricahrd. “Contradiction, assertion and “Frege” point”. 23-26.
Deas, Robert. “Sorensen`s sorites”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 26-31.
Rea, George. “Degrees of truth versus intuitionism”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221,
AÑO, p. 31-32.
Carter, W. R. “Can substantial changes be qualitative changes?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series
n. 221, AÑO, p. 33-35.
Arsenijevíc, Milós. “How many physically distinguished parts can a limited body contain?”
Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 36-42.
Pettit, Philip. “Determinism with deliberation”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p.
42-43.
Waller, Bruce. “Denying responsibility: the difference in makes”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New
Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 44-47.
Hardin, C. L: “Idle colours and busy spectra”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p.
47-48.
Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO
Hunt, G. M. K. “Hypothesizing for testing”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 4956.
Kukla, André “Is Al an empirical science?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 5660.
Campbell, Randall K. “The prisoner`s dilemma and the symmetry argument for cooperation”.
Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 60-65.
Nathan, N. “Democracy and impartiality”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 6570.
Taylor, Paul. “Insight and metaphor”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 71-77.
Newton, Natika. “Visualizing is imagining seeing: a reply to White”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New
Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 77-81.
White, Alan R. “Imaginary imagining”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 81-83.
Moser, Paul K. “Inferential justification and Foley`s foundations”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New
Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 84-88.
Foley, Ricahrd. “Reply to Moser”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 89-92.
Dale, J. “Adams on Modus Tollens”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 93-96.
Analysis, v. 49, n. 3, New Series n. 223, Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. AÑO,
p.
Over, D. E. “Vague objects and identity”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 9799.
Sainsbury, R. M. “What is a vague object?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 99103.
Johnsen, Bruce. “Is vague identity incoherent?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p.
103-112.
Burgess, J. A. “Vague identity: Evans misrepresented”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222,
AÑO, p. 112-119.
Haslanger, Sally. “Endurence and temporary intrinsics”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222,
AÑO, p. 119-125.
Baxter, Donald M. L. “Identity through time and the discernibility of identicals”. Analysis, v. 49,
n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 125-131.
Ramachandran, Murali. “An alternative translation scheme for counterpart theory”. Analysis, v.
49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 131-141.
Tye, Michael. “Supervaluatonism and the law of excluded middle”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New
Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 141-143.
Grim, Patrick and Mar, Gary. “On situations and the world”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n.
222, AÑO, p. 143-148.
Schlossberger, Eugene “Civil disobedience”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p.
148-153.
Gordon, David and Sadowsky, James. “Morally principled divestiture”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New
Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 153-155.
Cahn, Steven M. “A note on divestiture”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 156157.
Rea, George. “Inexplicability and the unpreventable”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222,
AÑO, p. 157-158.
Watkins, Michael. “The knowledge argument against “The Knowledge Argument””. Analysis, v.
49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 158-160.
Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO
Craig, E. J. “Nozick and the sceptic: the thumbnail version”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n.
224, AÑO, p. 161-162.
Pettit, Philip and Price, Huw. “Bare functional desire”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224,
AÑO, p. 162-169.
Miller, Alexander “An objection to Writhg`s treatment of intention”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New
Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 169-173.
Kurkla, André and Rebecca Kurkla: “Meaning holism and itentiona psychology”. Analysis, v. 49,
n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 173-175.
Ehring, Douglal. “The “only t1 though t2” principle”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224,
AÑO, p. 176-177.
Lowe, E. J. “Impredicative identity criteria and Davidson`s criterion of event identity”. Analysis,
v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 178-181.
Hincliff, Mark. “Plantinga`s defence of seious actualism”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n.
224, AÑO, p. 182-185.
Bringsjord, Selmer. “Grim on logic and omniscience”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224,
AÑO, p. 186-189.
Dale, J and Tanesini, A. “Why are Italians more reasonable than Australians?” Analysis, v. 49, n.
4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 189-194.
Rowlands, Mark N. J. “Property exemplification and proliferation”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New
Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 194-197.
Owens, David. “Disjunctive Laws. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 197-202.
Bamford, Greg. “Watkins and the pragmatic problem of induction”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New
Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 203-205.
Beck, Simon. “Parfit and the Russians”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 205209.
Waller, Bruce N. “Uneven starts and just deserts”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO,
p. 209-213.
McMahon, Christopher. “The better endowed and the difference principle”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4,
New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 213-216.
Rainbolt, George W. “Gauther on Cooperating in prisoner`s dilemmas”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4,
New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 216-220.
Broome, John. “An economic Newcomb problem”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224,
AÑO, p. 220-222.
McCall, Storrs and Armstrong, D. M. “God`s lottery”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224,
AÑO, p. 223-224.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO
Drange, Theodore M. “Liar syllogisms”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 1-7.
Hazen, Allen. “A variation on a paradox”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 7-8.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Moor, James and Fogelin, Robert. “A defence of modus tollens”.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 9-16.
Teichmann, Roger. “Actually”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 16-19.
Branquinho, Joâo. “Are Salmon`s “guises” disguised Fregean senses?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New
Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 19-24.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Honderich on the indispensability of the mental”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1,
New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 24-28.
Smilansky, Saul. “Van Inwagen on the “obviousness” of libertarian moral responsibility”.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 29-33.
White, V. Alan. “How to Mind one`s Ethics: a reply to van Inwagen”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New
Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 33-35.
Archard, David. “Paternalism defined”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 36-42.
Kraemer, E. R. “Is the best really necessary?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p.
42-43.
Schwartz, Stephen P. “Intuitionism versus degrees of truth”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n.
225, AÑO, p. 43-46.
Perez Laraudogottia, Jon. “A doxastic paradox”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO,
p. 47-48.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO
Hollis, Martin. “Moves and motives in the games we play”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n.
226, AÑO, p. 49-62.
Blackburn, Simon. “Filling in space”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 62-65.
Papineau, David. “Why supervenience?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 66-71.
Ray, Christopher. “Paradoxical tasks”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 71-74.
Morton, Adam. “Double conditionals”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 75-79.
Lowe, E. J. “Conditionals, context and transitivity”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226,
AÑO, p. 80-87.
Bennett, Jonathan. “Why is belief involuntary?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p.
87-107.
Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip. “Program explanation: a general perspective”. Analysis, v. 50,
n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 107-117.
Ben-Zeev, Aaron. “Why did Psammenitus not pity his son?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n.
226, AÑO, p. 118-126.
Kapitan,Tomis. “Action, uncertainty and divine impotence”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n.
226, AÑO, p. 127-133.
Jackson, Frank. “Classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p.
134-147.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO
Whyte, J. T. “Success semantics”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 149-157.
Noonan, Harold W. “Vaguer identity yet again”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO,
p. 157-162.
Ramachandran, Murali. “Contingent identity in counterpart theory”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New
Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 163-166.
Forbes, Graeme. “Counterparts, logic and metaphysics: reply to Ramachandran”. Analysis, v. 50,
n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 167-173.
Ramachandra, Murali. “Unsuccessful revisions of CCT”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227,
AÑO, p. 173-177.
Gillon, Brendan S. “Truth theoretical semantics and ambiguity”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series
n. 227, AÑO, p. 178-181.
Percival, Philip. “Fitch and intuitionistic knowability”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227,
AÑO, p. 182-187.
D. S. Clarke, Jr.: “Two uses of “know”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 188190.
Mendola, Joseph. “Intending and motivation”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p.
190-193.
Mele, Alfred R. “Intending and motivation: a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227,
AÑO, p. 194-197.
Barnes, Annette. “When do we deceive others?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO,
p. 197-202.
Hartogh den, Govertg. “Rationality in conversation and neutrality on politics”. Analysis, v. 50, n.
3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 202-205.
Shiner, Roger A. “The divestiture puzzle dissolved” Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227,
AÑO, p. 205-210.
Watkins, John. “The pragmatic problem of induction: a reply to Gower and Bamford”. Analysis,
v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 210-212.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990
Graid, Edward. “Davidson and the sceptic: the thumbnail version”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New
Series n. 228, 1990, p. 213-214.
Dudman, V. H. “Grammar, semantics and conditionals”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228,
1990, p. 214-224.
Crane, Tim. “An alleged analogy between numbers and propositions”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New
Series n. 228, 1990, p. 224-230.
Cam, Philip. “Insularity and the persistence of perceptual illusion”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New
Series n. 228, 1990, p. 231-235.
Slezak, Pete. “Reinterpreting images”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 235-243.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Externalism and experience”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228,
1990, p. 244-250.
Mele, Alfred R. “He wants to try”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 251-253.
Norcross, Alastair. “Consequentialism and the unforeseeable future”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New
Series n. 228, 1990, p. 253-256.
Smilansky, Saul. “Utilitarianism and the “punishment” of the innocent: the general problem”.
Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 256-261.
Adler, Jacob. “Murphy and mercy”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 262-268
Ehring, Douglas. “Nonbranching and nontransitivity”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228,
1990, p. 268-271.
Grim, Patrick. “On omniscience and a “set of all truths”: a reply to Bringsjord”. Analysis, v. 50,
n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 271-276.
Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991
Harold W. Noonan: Object-depedent thoughts and psychological redundancy. Analysis, v. 51, n.
1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 1-9.
Michael McKinsey: Ant-individualism and privileged access. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n.
229, 1991, p. 9-16.
Rrobert Kirk: Why shouldn`t we be able to solve the mind-body problem? Analysis, v. 51, n. 1,
New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 17-23.
Cynthia McDonald and Graham MacDonald: Mental causation and non-reductive monism.
Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 23-31.
Tim Crane: Why indeed? Papineau on supervenience. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229,
1991, p. 32-37.
David Papineau: The reason why: response to Crane. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229,
1991, p. 37-40.
Daniel Seymour: Remnants of schiffer`s principle (P). Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229,
1991, p. 40-43.
Rod Bertolet: Salmon on the a priori. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 443-48.
Eugene Mills: Forbes`s branching conception of possible worlds. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New
Series n. 229, 1991, p. 48-50.
Richard B. Miller: Reply of a Mad Dog. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 50-54.
Emilio Kosrovani: Hornsby`s puzzles: rejoinder to Wreen and Hornsby. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1,
New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 55-61.
Anthony Brueckner: Unfa5ri to Nozick. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 61-63.
Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991
Whyte, J.T. “The normal rewards of success”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p.
65-73.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Making sense of words”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p.
63-78.
Sartorelli, Joseph. “McGinn on concept skepticism and Kripke`s skeptical argument”. 79-84.
Neville Kemp, G. “Metaphor and aspect-perception”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230,
1991, p. 84-90.
Casati, Robert and Dokig, Jérôme. “Brainsd in a vat, language and metalanguage”. Analysis, v.
51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 91-93.
Seager, William. “Disjuntive laws and supervenience”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230,
1991, p. 93-98.
Foley, Richard. “Evidence and reasons for belief”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991,
p. 98-102.
Philip Goggans: “Epistemic obligations and doxastic voluntarism”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New
Series n. 230, 1991, p. 102-105.
Neil, Alex and Ridley, Aaron. “Burning passions”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991,
p. 106-108.
Adams, Frederick. “He doesn`t really want to try”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991,
p. 109-112.
Cahn, Steven M. “Principled divestiture and moral integrity”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n.
230, 1991, p. 112.
Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991
Cubitt, Robin P. and Hollis, Martin. “The mutual investment game: peculiarities of indifference”.
Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 113-119.
Schlesinger, George N. “The credibility of extraordinary events”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New
Series n. 231, 1991, p. 120-126.
Lowe, E. J. “Jackson on classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991,
p. 126-130.
Dudman, V. H. “Jackson classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991,
p. 131-136.
Jackson, Frank. “Classifying conditionals II”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p.
137-143.
Williams, C. J. F. “You and she”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 143-146.
Slateer, B. H. “Lair syllogisms and related paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231,
1991, p. 146-153.
Oderberg, David S. “A paradox about authority”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991,
p. 153-160.
Mason, Andrew. “Community and autonomy: logically incompatible values?” Analysis, v. 51, n.
3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 160-165.
Honderich, Ted. “Better the Union Theory”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p.
166-173.
Jordan, Jeff. “Duff and the Wager”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 174-176.
Correction. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 176.
Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991
Reimer, Marga. “Do demonstrattions have semantic significance?” Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New
Series n. 232, 1991, p. 177-183.
Jones, O. R. “Moore`s paradox, assertion and knowledge”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n.
232, 1991, p. 183-186.
Heller, Mark. “Indication and what might have been”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232,
1991, p. 187-191.
Lowe, E. J. “One-level versus two- level identity criteria”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n.
232, 1991, p. 192-194.
Williamson, Timothy. “Fregean directions”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p.
194-195.
Genova, C. “Craug on Davidson: a thumbnail refutation”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n.
232, 1991, p. 195-198.
Brueckner, Anthony. “The omniscient interpreter reides again”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series
n. 232, 1991, p. 199-205.
Everitt, Nicholas. “Strawson on laws and regularities”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232,
1991, p. 206-208.
Strawson, Galen. “The contingent reality of antural necessity”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series
n. 232, 1991, p. 209-213.
Irzik, Gürol. “Armstrong`s account of probabilistic laws”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n.
232, 1991, p. 214-217.
McGinn, Maire.“Westphal on the physical basis of colour incompatibility”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4,
New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 218-222.
Widerker, David, “Frankfurt on “Ought implies Can” and alternative possibilities”. Analysis, v.
51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 222-224.
Mele, Alfred R. “He wants to try again: a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232,
1991, p. 225-228.
Correction, Announcement. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 229.
COMPETITION SUPPLEMENT
J Whyte,. T. “Competition report”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 231-235.
Crane, Tim. “Coherence and the causation of beliefs”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232,
1991, p. 235-243.
Shiffrin, Seana. “All God has to do”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 244-254.
Hajek, Alan. “Moral autonomy and agent-centred options”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n.
232, 1991, p. 254-264.
Sider, Theodorore R. “Might theory X be a theory of diminishing marginal value?” Analysis, v.
51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 265-271.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995
Analyst announcement.1.
Arló Costa, Horacio, Collins, John & Levi, Isaac. “Desire-as-belief implies oponionation or
indifference”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p.2-5.
Broome, John. “The two-envelope paradox”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 611.
Landesma, Cliff. “When to teminate a charitable trust?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245,
1995, p. 12-13.
Noonan, Harold W. “E. J. Lowe: on vague identity and quantum indeterminacy”. Analysis, v. 55,
n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 14-19.
French, Steven & Krause, Décio. “Vague identity and quantum non-individuality”. Analysis, v.
55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 20-26.
Weir, Alan. “Gruesome perceptual spaces”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 2736.
Divers, John & Miller, Alexander “Platitudes and attitudes: a minimalist conception of belief”.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 37-44.
Ludlow, Peter. “Externalism, self-knowledge, naf the prevalence of slow switching”. Analysis, v.
55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 45-49.
Brock, Gillian. “Is redistribution to help the needy unjust?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n.
245, 1995, p. 50-59.
New, Christopher. “Punishing times: reply to Smilansky”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n.
245, 1995, p. 60-62.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995
Hale, Bob. “Modal fictionalims - a simple dilemma”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246,
1995, p. 63-67.
Rosen, Gideon. “Modal fictionalism fixed”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 6773.
Hale, Bob. “A desperate fix”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 74-80.
Edwards, Jim. “Modal fictionalism cannot deliver possible world semantics”. Analysis, v. 55, n.
2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 81-89.
Tennant, Neil .“On negation, truth na dwarranted assertibility”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series
n. 246, 1995, p. 90-97.
Hazen, P. “Is even minimal negation constructive?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246,
1995, p. 98-104.
Yaffe, Gideon. “Velleman on intentions as reasons for action”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series
n. 246, 1995, p. 105-107.
Smilansky, Saul. “May we stop worrying about blackmail?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n.
246, 1995, p. 107-115.
Mateavers, Derek. “Beliefs and fictional narrators”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246,
1995, p. 116-120.
McGrew, Tim. “Two cheers for Bayes`s theorem”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995,
p. 121-125.
Tye, Michael. “What what it`s like is really life”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995,
p. 125-126.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995
Melia, Joseph. “The significance of non-standard models”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n.
247, 1995, p. 127-134.
Daly, Chris. “Does physicalism need fixing?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p.
135-141.
Pettit, Philip. “Microphysicalism, dottism and reduction”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n.
247, 1995, p. 141-146.
Brueckner, Anthony. “The characteristic thesis of anti-individualism”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New
Series n. 247, 1995, p. 146-148.
Brown, Jessica. “The incompatibility of anti-individualism and privileged access”. Analysis, v.
55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 149-156.
Ludlow, Peter. “Social externalism, selg-knowledge, and memory”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New
Series n. 247, 1995, p. 157-159.
Dodd, Jualin. “MCDowell and identity theories of truth”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247,
1995, p. 160-165.
Denkel, Arda. “Theon`s tale: Does a Cambridge change result in a substantial change?” Analysis,
v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 166-170.
Lowe, E. J. “Coinciding objects: In defence of the “standard account”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New
Series n. 247, 1995, p. 171-178.
Lowe, E. J. “The problem of the many and the vagueness of constitution”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3,
New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 179-182.
Keeffe, Rosanna. “Contingent identity and vague identity”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n.
247, 1995, p. 183-190.
O`Leary-Haethorne, John. “The bundle theory of substance and the identity of indescernibles”.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 191-196.
Hardy, James. “Is Yablo`s paradox Liar-like?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p.
197-198.
Tennant, Neil. “On paradox without self-reference”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247,
1995, p. 199-207.
Schlesinger, George N. “Measuring degress of confirmation”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n.
247, 1995, p. 208-212.
Milne, Peter. “A Bayesian defence of Popperian science?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n.
247, 1995, p. 213-215.
Cargile, James. “Justificaiton and misleading defeaters”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247,
1995, p. 216-220.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Dying quickly but painfully”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247,
1995, p. 221-222.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995
Melia, Joseph. “On what there`s not”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 223-229.
Kukla, André. “Scientifc realism and theoretical unification”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n.
248, 1995, p. 230-238.
Papineau, David. “Prababilities and the many minds interpretaiton of quantum mechanics”.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 239-246.
Markosian, Ned. “On the arguemnt from quantum cosmology against theism”. Analysis, v. 55, n.
4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 247-251.
Byron, Michael. “Rationality is not fair”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 252260.
Davenport, John. “Deontology and Alan Donagan`s problem of exception-rules”. Analysis, v. 55,
n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 261-270.
Ruse, Michael. “Gay rights and affirmative action: a reponse to Satrelli”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4,
New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 271-274.
Carlson, Reik. “Brink`s and Pietroski`s obligaton execution principle”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New
Series n. 248, 1995, p. 275-279.
Gillon, Brendan S. “Peirce`s challenge to material implication as a model of “if”. Analysis, v. 55,
n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 280-282.
Ramachandran, Murali. “Bach on behalf of Russell”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248,
1995, p. 283-287.
Ganeri, Jonardon. “Contextually incomplete descriptions – a new counterexample to Russell?”
Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 287-290.
Stanley, Jason & Williamson, Timothy. “Quantifiers and context-dependence”. Analysis, v. 55, n.
4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 291-295.
Lau, Joe. “Pietroski on possible worlds semantics for belief sentences”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New
Series n. 248, 1995, p. 295-298.
Sheldon Davies, Paul. “Defending” proper functions”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248,
1995, p. 299-305.
Merricks, Trenton. “On behalf of the coherentist”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995,
p. 306-309.
McNamara, Paul. “The confinement problem: how to terminate your Mon with her trust”.
Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 310-313.
Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996
Smiley, Timothy. “Rejection”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 1-9.
Weir, Alan. “Ultramaximalist minimalism!” Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 1022.
Nolan, Daniel & O`leary-Hawthorne, John. “Reflexive fictionalisms”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New
Series n. 249, 1996, p. 23-32.
Hazen, P. “Worlds as complete novels” Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 33-38.
Williamson, Timothy. “Writh on the epistemic conception of vagueness”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1,
New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 39-45.
Holton, Richard. “Davidson, McFetridge, and the counting problem”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New
Series n. 249, 1996, p. 46-50.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Unbeggable questions”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 5155.
Belzer, Marvin. “Notes on Relation R”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 56-62.
Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996
Kennatt, Jenette & Smith, Michael. “Frog and Toad lose control”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New
Series n. 250, 1996, p. 63-73.
Kirk, Robert. “Why ultra-extenalism goes too far”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996,
p. 73-79.
Adler, Jonathan E. “An overlooked argument for epistemic conservatism”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2,
New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 80-84.
Predelli, Stefano. “Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2,
New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 85-91.
Schiffer, Stephen. “The hiddden-indexical theory`s logical –from problem: a rejoinder”. Analysis,
v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 92-97.
Ludlow, Peter. “The adicity of “believes” and the hidden indexical theory”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2,
New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 97-101.
Kapitan, Tomis. “Incompatibilism and ambiguity in the practical modalities”. Analysis, v. 56, n.
2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 102-110.
Qoward-Snyder, Frances. “A new argument for consequentialism? A rely to Sinnott-Armstrong”.
Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 111-115.
Broome, John. “More pain or less?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 116-118.
Klein, Peter & Warfield, Ted A. “No hellp for the coherentist”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series
n. 250, 1996, p. 118-121.
Cade Hetherington, Stephen. “Foley`s evidence and his epistemic reasons”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2,
New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 122-126.
Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996
Forrest, Peter. “How innocent is mereology?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p.
127-131.
Reimer, Marga. “Quotation marks: demonstratives or demonstrations?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New
Series n. 251, 1996, p. 131-141.
Cogan, Ross. Opting out: “Bennett on classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series
n. 251, 1996, p. 142-145.
Butler, Keith. “Content, computation, and individualism in vision theory”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3,
New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 146-154.
Swanton, Christine. “Is the moral problem solved?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251,
1996, p. 155-160.
Smith, Michael. “Normative reasons and full rationality: reply to Swanton”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3,
New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 160-168.
Miller, Alexander. “An objection to Smith`s argument for internalism”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New
Series n. 251, 1996, p. 169-174.
Smith, Michael. “The argument for internalism: a reply to Miller”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New
Series n. 251, 1996, p. 175-184.
Graham, Keith. “Voting and motivation”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 184190.
Correction 190.
Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996
O`Leary-Hawthorne, John & Pettit, Philip. “Strategies for free will compatibilists”. Analysis, v.
56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 191-201.
Williamson, Timothy. “Self-knowledge and embedded operators”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New
Series n. 252, 1996, p. 202-209.
Barker, Stephen. “Parsing if-sentences and the conditions of sentencehood”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4,
New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 210-218.
Ganeri, Jonardon, Noordhof, Paul & Ramachandran, Murali. “Counterfactuals and preemptive
caustion”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 219-225.
Oppy, Grahn. “Gödelian ontological argument”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p.
226-230.
Baldwin, Thomas. “There might be nothing”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p.
231-238.
Dodd, Julian. “Countering the counting problem: a reply to Holton”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New
Series n. 252, 1996, p. 239-245.
Rumfitt, Ian. “The vagaries of paraphrase: a reply to Holton on the counting problem”. Analysis,
v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 246-250.
Frankish, Keith. “How should we revise the paratactic theory?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series
n. 252, 1996, p. 251-262.
Moser, Paul K. “Physicalism and mental causes: contra Papineau”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New
Series n. 252, 1996, p. 263-267.
Tidman, Paul. “Critical reflection: an alleged epistemic duty”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n.
252, 1996, p. 268-276.
Steup, Mathias. “Tidman on critical reflection”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p.
277-281.
Stoljar, Daniel. “What what it`s like isn`t like”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p.
281-283.
Index to Volume 56. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 284
Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997
Levey, Samuel. “Coincidence and principles of composition”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n.
253, 1997, p. 1-10.
Burke, Michael B. “Coinciding objects: reply to Lowe and Denkel”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New
Series n. 253, 1997, p. 11-18.
Zimmerman, Dean W. “Coincident objects: could a “stuff ontology” help?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 1,
New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 19-27.
McGrew, Timothy J., Shier, David & Silverstein, Harry S. “The two-envelope paradox resolved”.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 28-33.
Scott, Alexander D. & Scott, Michael. “What`s in the two envelope paradox?” Analysis, v. 57, n.
1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 34-41.
Arntzenius, Frank & McCarthy, David. “The two envelope paradox and infinite expectations”.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 42-50.
Davies, David. “Why one shouldn`t make an example of a brain in a vat”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1,
New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 51-59.
Laurence, Stephen & Margolis, Eric. “Regress arguments against the language of thought”.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 60-66.
Miller, Richard W. “Extenalist self-knowledge and the scope of the a priori”. Analysis, v. 57, n.
1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 67-75.
Milne, Peter. “Quick triviality proofs for probabilities of conditionals”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New
Series n. 253, 1997, p. 75-80.
Achinstein, Peter. “On Evidence: a reply to McGrew”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253,
1997, p. 81-83.
Whyte, J. T. “Success again: replies to Brandom and Godfrey-Smith”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New
Series n. 253, 1997, p. 84-88.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Noonan on vague identity”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997,
p. 88-91.
Vallicella, William F. “Bundles and indiscenibility: a reply to O`Leary-Hawthorne”. Analysis, v.
57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 91- 94.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997
Markosian, Ned. “The paradox of the question”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p.
95-97.
Sider, Theodore. “On the paradox of the question”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997,
p. 97-101.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Substitution and simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254,
1997, p. 102-108.
Forbes, Graeme. “How much substitutivity?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p.
109-113.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Reply to Forbes”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 114-118.
Mele, Alfred R. “Underestimating self-control: Kennett and Smith on Frog and Toad”. Analysis,
v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 119-123.
Kennett, Jeanette & Smith, Michael. “Synchronic self-control is always non-actional”. Analysis,
v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 123-131.
Greene, Richard & Balmert, N. A. “Two notions of warrant and Plantinga`s solution to the
Gettier problem”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 132-139.
Plantinga, Alvin. “Warrant and accidentally true belief”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254,
1997, p. 140-145.
Girm, Patrick. “Worlds by supervenience: some further pfoblems”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New
Series n. 254, 1997, p. 146-151.
Edwards, Jim. “Is Tennant selling truth short?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p.
152-158.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “There might be nothing: the subtraction argument improved”.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 159-166.
Braddon-Mitchell, David & Nola, Robert. “Ramsification and Glymour`s counterexample”.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 167-169.
Carroll, John W. “Lipton on compatible contrasts”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997,
p. 170-178.
Bovens, Luc. “The backwards induction argument for the finite iterated prisoner`s dilemma and
the surprise exam paradox”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 179-186.
Lillehammer, Hallvard. “Smith on moral fetishism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255,
1997, p. 187-195.
Garvey, James. “What does McGinn think we cannot know?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n.
255, 1997, p. 196-201.
Juhl, Cory F. “A context-sensitive liar”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 202204.
Clark, Michael. “Truth and success: Searle`s attack on minimalism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New
Series n. 255, 1997, p. 205-209.
Tappolet, Christine. “Mixed inferences: a problem for pluralism about truth predicates”. Analysis,
v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 209-210.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “Self-ascription, self-knowledge, and the memory argument”. Analysis, v.
57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 211-219.
Yujen Teng, Normas. “Sorensen on begging the question”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n.
255, 1997, p. 220-222.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997
Rumfitt, Ian. “The categoricity problem and truth-value gaps”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series
n. 256, 1997, p. 223-235.
Priest, Graham. “Yablo`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 236-242.
Hazen, P. “Relations in Lewis`s framework without atoms”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n.
256, 1997, p. 243-248.
Oppy, Graham. “Countable fusion not yet proven guilty: it may be the Witeheadian account of
space whatdunnit”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 249-253.
Ehring, Douglas. “Lew, temporary intrinsics and momentary tropes”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New
Series n. 256, 1997, p. 254-258.
Burgess, J. A. “What is minimalism about truth?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997,
p. 259-267.
Dodd, Julian. “On a Davidsonian objection to minimalism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n.
256, 1997, p. 267-272.
Adams, Fred & Aizawa, Ken. “Rock beats scissors: historical fights back”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4,
New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 273-281.
Warfield, Ted A. “Externalism, privileged self-knowledge, and the irrelevance of slow
switching”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 282-284.
Ludlow, Peter. “On the relevance of slow switching”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256,
1997, p. 285-286.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Is scepticism about self-Knowledge incoherent?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 4,
New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 287-290.
Lane Graig, William. “Hartle-Hawking cosmology and atheism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New
Series n. 256, 1997, p. 291-295.
Smith, Quentin. “Quantum cosmology`s implication of atheism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New
Series n. 256, 1997, p. 295-304.
Deltete, Robert J. & Guy, Reed A. “Hartle-Hawking cosmology and unconditional probabilities”.
Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 304-315.
Index to Volume 57. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 316.
Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998
Hurley, S. L. “Vehicles, contents, conceptual structure, and externalism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1,
New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 1-6.
Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David. “The extended mind”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257,
1998, p. 7-19.
Hill, Christopher S. “Chalmers on the apriority of modal knowledge”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New
Series n. 257, 1998, p. 20-26.
MavBride, Fraser. “On how we know what there is”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257,
1998, p. 27-37.
Byrne, Alex & Hall, Ned. “Against the PCA-analysis”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257,
1998, p. 38-44.
Ganeri, Jonardon, Noordhof, Paul & Ramachandran, Murali. “For a (revised) PCA-analysis”.
Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 45-47.
Paul, L. A. “Problems with late pre-emption”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p.
48-53.
McFarland, Duncan. “Crane on concepts and experiential content”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New
Series n. 257, 1998, p. 54-58.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reflection on Putnam, Wright and brains in vats”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New
Series n. 257, 1998, p. 59-62.
Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998
Melia, Joseph. “Field`s programme: some interference”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258,
1998, p. 63-71.
Baldwin, Thomas. “Modal fictionalism and the imagination”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n.
258, 1998, p. 72-75.
McFarlnad, Duncan & Miller, Alexander. “Jackson on colour as a primary quality”. Analysis, v.
58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 76-85.
Jackson, Frank. “Colour, disjunctions, programming”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258,
1998, p. 86-88.
Reimer, Marga. “Donnellan`s distinction/Kripke`s test”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258,
1998, p. 89-100.
Hawley, Katherine. “Indeterminism and indeterminacy”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258,
1998, p. 101-106.
Predelli, Stefano “I am not here now”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 107-115.
McGrath, Matthew. “Van Inwagen`s critique of universalism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series
n. 258, 1998, p. 116-121.
Lane Craig, William. “McTaggart`s paradox and the problem of temporary intrinsics”. Analysis,
v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 122-127.
Copeland, B. Jack. “Turing`s O-machines, Searle, Penrose and brain”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New
Series n. 258, 1998, p. 128-138.
Daniel, Steven G. “A defence of Papineau and mental causes”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series
n. 258, 1998, p. 139-145.
Silverstein, Harry S. “More pain or less? Comments on Broome”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New
Series n. 258, 1998, p. 146-151.
Norcross, Alstai.r “Great harms form small benefits grow: how death can be outweighed by
headaches”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 152-158.
Hanser, Matthew. “A puzzle about beneficence”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998,
p. 159-165.
Holtug, Nils. “Egalitarianism and the levelling down objection”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series
n. 258, 1998, p. 166-174.
Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Mellor`s facts and chances of causations”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3,
New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 175-181.
Beebee, Helen. “Do causes raise the chances of effects?” Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259,
1998, p. 182-190.
Paul, L. A. “Keeping track of the time: emending the counterfactual analysis of causation”.
Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 191-198.
Hájek, Alan “Agnosticism meets Bayesianism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p.
199-206.
Monton, Bradley. “Bayesian agnosticism and constructive empiricism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3,
New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 207-212.
Fraassen, Bas van. “The agnostic subtly probabilified”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259,
1998, p. 212-220.
Tennant, Neil. “The full price of truth”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 221228.
Crlson, Erick. “Fischer on backtracking and Newcomb`s problem”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New
Series n. 259, 1998, p. 229-231.
Borg, Emma. “Semantic category and surface form”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259,
1998, p. 232-238.
Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998
Jackson, Frank & Pettit, Philip. “A problem for expressivism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series
n. 260, 1998, p. 239-251.
Bartha, Paul & Savitt, Steven F. “Second-guessing second nature”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New
Series n. 260, 1998, p. 252-263.
Knowles, Janthan. The language of thought and natural language understanding” Analysis, v. 58,
n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 264-272.
Elder, Crawford L. “What sensory signals are about”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260,
1998, p. 273-276.
Dudman, V. H. “On the grammar of conditionals: reply to Brker”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New
Series n. 260, 1998, p. 277-285.
Fogelin, Robert J. “David Lewis on indicative and counterfactual conditionals”. Analysis, v. 58,
n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 286-289.
Barker, Stephen J. “Predetermination and tense probabilism. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n.
260, 1998, p. 290-296.
Rickless, Samuel C. “The semantic function of chained pronouns”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New
Series n. 260, 1998, p. 297-304.
Mele, Alfred R. “Synchronic self-control revisited: Frog and Toad shape up”. Analysis, v. 58, n.
4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 305-310.
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Internalism and the explanation of belief/motivation changes”. Analysis,
v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 311-315.
Index to Volume 58. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 316.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999
Priest, Graham. “On a version of one of Zeno`s paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n.
261, 1999, p. 1-2.
Williamson, Timothy. “A note on truth, satisfaction and the empty domain”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1,
New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 3-8.
Richard Holton: “Dispositions all the way round”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999,
p. 9-14.
Stanley, Jason. “Understanding, context-relativity, and the Description Theory”. Analysis, v. 59,
n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 14-18.
Ehring,Douglas. “Tropeless in Seattle: the cure for insomnia”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n.
261, 1999, p. 19-24.
Spurrett, David & Papineau, David. “A note on the completeness of “physics”. Analysis, v. 59, n.
1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 25-29.
Warfield, Ted A. “Searle`s causal powers”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 2932.
Shafer-Landau, Russ. “Moral judgement and normative reasons”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New
Series n. 261, 1999, p. 33-40.
Hanser, Matthew. “Interfering with aid”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 41-47.
Nuccetelli, Susana. “What anti-individualists cannot know a priori”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New
Series n. 261, 1999, p. 48-51.
Brown, Jessica. “Boghossian on externalism and privileged access”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New
Series n. 261, 1999, p. 52-59.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Difficulties in generating scepticism about knowledge of content”.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 59-62.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999
Cohen, Jonathan. “Holism: some reasons for buyre`s remorse”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series
n. 262, 1999, p. 63-71.
Heal, Jane. “Thoughts and holism”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 71-78.
Cohen, Jonathan. “Holism, thought, and the fate of metaphysics: counter-reply to Heal”.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 79-85.
Forbes, Graem. “Enlightened semantics for simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series
n. 262, 1999, p. 86-91.
Moore, Joseph G. “Saving substitutivity in simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n.
262, 1999, p. 91-105.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Substitution, simple sentences, and sex scandals”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New
Series n. 262, 1999, p. 106-112.
Predelli, Stefano. “Saul, Salmon, and Superman”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999,
p. 113-116.
Clark, Michael. “Recalcitrant variants of the liar paradox”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n.
262, 1999, p. 117-126.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999
Noordhof, Paul. “Moral requirements are still not rational requirements”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3,
New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 127-136.
Sobel, David. “Do the desires of rational agents converge?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n.
263, 1999, p. 137-147.
Poidevin, Robin Le. “Can beliefs be caused by their truth-makers?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New
Series n. 263, 1999, p. 148-156.
Rice, Hugh. “David Lewis`s awkward cases of redundant causation”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New
Series n. 263, 1999, p. 157-164.
Percival, Philip. “A note on Lewis on counterfactual dependence in a chancy world”. Analysis, v.
59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 165-173.
Mormann, Thomas. “Nither merelogy nor Whiteheadian account of space yet convicted”.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 174-182.
Stoneham, Tom. “Logical form and thought content”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263,
1999, p. 183-185.
Cross, Charles B. “Coherence and truth conducive justification”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series
n. 263, 1999, p. 186-193.
Hetherington, Stephen. “Epistemic disaster averted”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263,
1999, p. 194-200.
Rea, Michael C. “McGrath on Universalism”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p.
201-204.
Garrett, Brian. “A sceptical tension”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 205-206.
Sawyer, Sarh. “My language disquotes”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 206211.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “Word-ambiguity, world-switching, and knowledge of content: reply to
Brueckner”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 212-217.
Yaffe, Gideon.““Ought” implies “can” and the principle of alternate possibilities”. Analysis, v.
59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 218-222.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999
Waller, Bruce N. “Deep thinkers, cognitive misers, and moral responsibility”. Analysis, v. 59, n.
4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 223-229.
Bovens, Luc. “The two faces of akratics anonymous”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264,
1999, p. 230-236.
Broome, John & Rabinowicz, Wlodek. “Backwards induction in the centipede game”. Analysis,
v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 237-242.
Bermúdez, José Luis. “Rationality and the Backwards induction argument”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4,
New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 243-248.
Carroll, John W. “Decision-theoretic finitely iterated prisoner`s dilemmas”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4,
New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 249-256.
McGee, Vann. “An airtight Dutch book”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 257265.
MIntoff, Joe. “Are decisions motive-perpetuating?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264,
1999, p. 266-275.
Ruben, David-Hillel. “Act individuation: the Cambridge theory”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New
Series n. 264, 1999, p. 276-283.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Circular queue paradoxes-the missing link”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New
Series n. 264, 1999, p. 284-290.
Doff, Julian. “There is no norm of truth: a minimalist reply to Wright”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New
Series n. 264, 1999, p. 291-299.
Edwards, Jim. “Prizing truth corm warranted assertibility: reply to Tennant”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4,
New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 300-308.
Gettings, Michael. “Gödel`s ontological argument: a reply to Oppy”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New
Series n. 264, 1999, p. 309-313.
Oaklander, L. Nathan. “Craig on McTaggart`s Paradox and the problem temporary intrinsics”.
314- 318.
Lane Craig, William. “Oaklandes on McTaggart and intrinsic change”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New
Series n. 264, 1999, p. 319-320.
Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen. “Where the regress argument still goes wrong: reply to
Knowles”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 321-327.
Lowe, E. J. “Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy: further reflections”. Analysis, v. 59, n.
4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 328-330.
Scott, Alexander D. & Scott, Michael. “The paradox of the question”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New
Series n. 264, 1999, p. 331-334.
Pollard, Stephen. “Milne`s measure of confirmation”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264,
1999, p. 335-337.
Shogenji, Tomoji. “Is coherence truth conducive?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999,
p. 338-345.
Coppock, Paul. “Supervenient causation and program explanation: a note on the difference”.
Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 346-354.
Hubin, Danald C. “Converging on values”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 355361.
Index to Volume 59. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 362.
Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000
Ketland, Jeffrey. “A proof of the (strengthened) Liar formula in a semantical extension of Peano
Arithmetic”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 1-4.
Cook, Roy T. & Cogburn, Jon. “What negation is not: intuitionism and “0 = 1”. Analysis, v. 60,
n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 5-12.
Needham, Paul. “What is water?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 13-21.
Lewis, Peter J. “What is it like be Schödinger`s cat?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265,
2000, p. 22-29.
Clark, Andy. “A case where access implies qualia?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265,
2000, p. 30-37.
Beall, Jc. “A neglected response to the Grim result”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265,
2000, p. 38-41.
Crisp, Thomas M. “Gettier and Plantinga`s revised account of warrant”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1,
New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 42-50.
Pust, Joel. “Warrant and analysis”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 51-57.
Worley, Sara. “What is property P, anyway?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p.
58-62.
Mackie, Penelope. “Mellor on causes, chances and degrees of effectiveness”. Analysis, v. 60, n.
1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 63-71.
Mellor, D. H. “Equally effective causes”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 71-73.
Rysiew, Patrick. “Conventional wisdom”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 7483.
Sider, Theodore. “The stage view and temporary intrinsics”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n.
265, 2000, p. 84-88.
Katzoff, Charlotte. “Counter-evidence and the duty to critically reflect”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1,
New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 89-96.
Almeida, Michael J. “Why we ought to be a little less beneficent”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New
Series n. 265, 2000, p. 97-106.
McGeen, Vann. “To tell the truth about conditionals”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265,
2000, p. 107-111.
Weiss, Bernhard. “Generalizing brains in vats”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p.
112-123.
Edwards, Jim. “Burge on testimony and memory”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000,
p. 124-131.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Externalism and the a prioricity of self-knowledge”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1,
New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 132-136.
Flvey, Kevin. “The compatibility of anti-individualism and privileged access”. Analysis, v. 60, n.
1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 137-142.
Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000
Elga, Adam. “Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New
Series n. 266, 2000, p. 143-147.
Dudman, V. H. “Classifying “conditionals”: the traditional way is wrong”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2,
New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 147.
Yablo, Stephen. “A reply to new Zeno”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 148151.
Pérez Laraudogoitia, Jon. “Priest on the paradox of the gods”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n.
266, 2000, p. 152-155.
Weir, Alan. “Token relativism and the Lair”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p.
156-169.
Goldstein, Laurence. “How to boil a live frog”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p.
170-177.
Brown, Jessica. “Against temporal externalism”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p.
178-188.
Stephanou, Yannis. “Necessary beings”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 188193.
Wolf, Jonathan. “The morality of sales tax”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p.
194-195.
Mautner, Thomas. “Problems for anti-expressivism”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266,
2000, p. 196-201.
Sorensen, Roy. “Faking Munchausen`s syndrome”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266,
2000, p. 202-208.
McFarland, Duncan & Miller, Alexander. “Disjunctions, programming and Australian view of
colour”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 209-212.
Richard, Mark. “On an argument of Williamson`s”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266,
2000, p. 213-217.
Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000
Bradley, Richard. “A preservation condition for conditionals”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n.
267, 2000, p. 219-222.
Stephanou, Yannis. “How many possible worlds are there?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n.
267, 2000, p. 223-228.
Black, Robert. “Nothing matters too much, or Wright is wrong”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series
n. 267, 2000, p. 229-237.
Brown, Bryson. “An empty refinement in Mellor`s definition of chances”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3,
New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 238-243.
Mellor, D. H. “The point of refinement”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 243246.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Sawyer on brains in vats”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267,
2000, p. 247-249.
Moore, Joseph G. “Did Clinton lie?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 250-254.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Did, Clinton say something false?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267,
2000, p. 255-257.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Ambiguity and knowledge of content”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n.
267, 2000, p. 257-260.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “Word-ambiguity, world-switching, and semantic intentions. Analysis, v.
60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 260-264.
Roger Crisp: Utilitarianism and accomplishment”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000,
p. 264-267.
Braker, Setphen J. “Is value content a component of conventional implicature?” Analysis, v. 60,
n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 268-279.
Garrard, Eve. “Slote on virtue”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 280-283.
Blum, Alex. “N”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 284-286.
Blum, Alex. “The Kantian versus Frankfurt”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p.
287-288.
Otsuka, Michael. “Scanlon and claims of the many versus the one”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New
Series n. 267, 2000, p. 288-293.
García Súarez, Alfons. “The Verification Principle: another puncture”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New
Series n. 267, 2000, p. 293-295.
Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000
McGee, Vann & Rayo, Aguistín. “A puzzle about de rebus beliefs”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New
Series n. 268, 2000, p. 297-299.
Barber, Alex. “A pragmatic treatment of simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n.
268, 2000, p. 300-308.
Bermúdez, José Luis. “Self-deception, intentions, and contradictory beliefs”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4,
New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 309-319.
Ketland, Jeffrey. “Conservativeness and translation- dependent T-schemes”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4,
New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 319-327.
Robertson, Teresa. “On Soames`s solution to the sorites paradox”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New
Series n. 268, 2000, p. 328-334.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Lowe`s argument against nihilism”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New
Series n. 268, 2000, p. 335-340.
Beall, Jc. “Minimalism, gaps, and the Holton conditional”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n.
268, 2000, p. 340-351.
Hazen, Allen. “Relaions in Lewis`s framework without atoms: a correction”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4,
New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 351-353.
Noonan, Harold W. “McKinsey – Brown survives”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268,
2000, p. 353-356.
Akiba, Ken. “Shogenji`s probabilistic measure of coherence is incoherent”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4,
New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 356-359.
Mackie, Penelope. “Causes, chances, and degrees of effectivenss: reply to Mellor”. Analysis, v.
60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 359-363.
Oppy,Graham. “Response to Gettings”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 363367.
Grey, William. “Gasking`s proof”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 368-370.
Oliver, Alex & Schmeinong, Alexius. “Ghost writers”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268,
2000, p. 371.
Index to Volume 60. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 373.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001
Dummett, Michael. “Victor`s error”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 1-2.
Lycan, William G. “A simple argument for a higher-order representation theory of
consciousness”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 3-4.
Vision, Gerald. “Flash! Fodor splits the atom”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p.
5-10.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Causation, influence, and effluence”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n.
269, 2001, p. 11-19.
Melia, Joseph. “Rediucing possibilities to language”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269,
2001, p. 19-29.
Hanfling, Oswald. “What is wrong with sorites arguments?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n.
269, 2001, p. 29-35.
Abbruzzese, John. “On using the multiverse to avoid the paradoxes time travel”. Analysis, v. 61,
n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 36-38.
Olson, Eric T. “Personal identity and the radiation argument”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n.
269, 2001, p. 38-44.
Sobel, David & Copp, David. “Against direction of fit accounts of belief and desire”. 44-53.
Predelli, Stefano. “Copmlex demonstratives and anaphora”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n.
269, 2001, p. 53-59.
Fabre, Cécile. “The choice-based right to bequeath”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269,
2001, p. 60-65.
Odrowaz-Spyniewska, Joanna. “Quantum indiscernibility without vague identity”. Analysis, v.
61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 65-69.
McGrath, Matthew. “Rea on Universalism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 6976.
Miller, Alexander “The missing-explanation argument revisited”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New
Series n. 269, 2001, p. 76-85.
Slter, B. H. “Prior`s analytic revised”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 86-90.
Correction to Alex Blum`s “N”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 90.
Nelkin, Dana K. & Rickless, Samuel C. “How to solve Blum`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1,
New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 91-94.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001
Noordhof, Paul. “In pain”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 95-97.
Bird, Alexander. “Scepticism and contrast classes”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270,
2001, p. 97-106.
Nelkin, Dana K. “The Consequence argument and the mind argument”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New
Series n. 270, 2001, p. 107-115.
Goldstei, Laurence. “Truth-bearers and the Liar- a reply to Alan Weir”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New
Series n. 270, 2001, p. 115-125.
Beall, Jc. “A neglected deflactionist approach to the liar”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n.
270, 2001, p. 126-129.
Gauker, Christopher. “T-schema deflactionism versus Gödel`s first incompleteness theorem”.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 129-136.
Dauer, Francis W. “McGinn`s materialism and epiphenomenalism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New
Series n. 270, 2001, p. 136-138.
Clemenson, David. “A paradox of actuality”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p.
139-141.
Cave, Peter. “Too self-fulfilling”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 141-146.
Shogenji, Tomoji. “Reply to Akiba on the probabilistic measure of coherence”. Analysis, v. 61, n.
2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 147-150.
Hurley, S. L. “Reason and motivation: the wrong distinction?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series
n. 270, 2001, p. 151-155.
McNaughton, David & Rawling, Piers. “Achievement, welfare and consequentialism”. Analysis,
v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 156-162.
Crisp, Roger. “Utilitarianism and accomplishment revisited”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n.
270, 2001, p. 162-164.
Kumar, Rahul. “Contractualism on saving the many”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270,
2001, p. 165-170.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p.
Lewis, David. “Sleeping Beauty: reply to Elga”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p.
171-176.
Beall, Jc. “Is Yablo`s paradox non-circular?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p.
176-187.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Chalmers`s conceivability argument for dualism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3,
New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 187-193.
Dokic, Jérôme & Pacherie, Ëlisabeth. “Shades and concepts”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n.
271, 2001, p. 193-201.
Jonathan Schaffer: “Knowledge, relevant alternatives and missed clues”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3,
New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 202-208.
Alan Hájek & Daniel Stoljar: “Crimmins, Gonzales and Moore”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series
n. 271, 2001, p. 208-213.
Jessica Brown: “Anti-individualism and agnosticism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271,
2001, p. 213-224.
Gregory, Dominic.“B is innocent”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 225-229.
Fischer, John Martin. “Newcomb`s problem: a reply to Carlson”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New
Series n. 271, 2001, p. 229-236.
Olsen, Erik J. “Why coherence is not truth-conducive”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271,
2001, p. 236-241.
Lowe, E. J. “Ontic indeterminacy of identity unscathed”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271,
2001, p. 241-245.
Mason, Andrew. “Egalitarianism and the Levelling Down Objection”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New
Series n. 271, 2001, p. 246-254.
Smith, Michael. “The incoherence argument: reply to Schafer-Landau”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3,
New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 254-266.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001
Bird, Alexander. “Necessarily, salt dissolves in water”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272,
2001, p. 267-274.
Lewis, David. “Forget about the “correspondence theory of truth”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New
Series n. 272, 2001, p. 275-280.
Armour-Garb, Bradley. “Deflationism and the Meaningless Strategy”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New
Series n. 272, 2001, p. 280-289.
Copeland, Jack, Dyke, Heather & Proudfoot, Diane. “Temporal parts and their individuation”.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 289-292.
Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stpehen. “Boghossian on analyticity. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New
Series n. 272, 2001, p. 293-302.
Gillett, Carl & Witmer, D. Gene. “A “physical” need: physicalism and the via negative”.
Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 302-308.
Bostrom, Nick. “The meta-Newcomb problem”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p.
309-310.
Predelli, Setfano. “Art, Bart and Superman”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p.
310-313.
Lurz, Robert W. “Begging the question: a reply to Lyca”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n.
272, 2001, p. 313-318.
Campbell Manson, Neil. “The limitations and costs of Lycan`s “simple” argument”. 319-323.
Noordhof, Paul. “In defence of influence?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 323327.
Hinto, Timothy. “Sandel on tolerance”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 327333.
Hooker, Brad. “Cudworth and Quinn”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 333-335.
Schnall, Ira M. “The principle of alternate possibilities and “ought” implies “can”. Analysis, v.
61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 335-340.
Hirose, Iwao. “Saving the greater number without combining claims”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New
Series n. 272, 2001, p. 341-342.
Index to Volume 61. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 343.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002
Matthews, Gareth B. “On the idea of there being soothing of everything in everything”. Analysis,
v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 1-4.
Wetphal, Jonathan. “The retrenchability of “the present”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273,
2002, p. 4-10.
Priest, Graham. “Rational dilemmas”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 11-16.
Cook, Roy T. “Counterintuitive consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth”. Analysis, v. 62,
n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 16-22.
Beall, Jc. & Beuno, Octávio. “The simple liar without bivalence?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New
Series n. 273, 2002, p. 22-26.
Weir, Alan. “Rejoinder to Laurence Goldstein on the Liar”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n.
273, 2002, p. 26-34.
Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. “Now the French are invading England!” Analysis, v. 62, n. 1,
New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 34-41.
Choi, Sungho. “The “actual events” clause in Noordhof`s account of causation”. Analysis, v. 62,
n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 41-45.
Noordhof, Paul. “Sungho Choi and the “actual events” clause”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series
n. 273, 2002, p. 46-47.
Monton, Bradley. “Sleeping Beauty and the forgetful Bayesian”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series
n. 273, 2002, p. 47-53.
Arntzenius, Frank. “Reflections on Sleeping Beauty”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273,
2002, p. 53-61.
Lowe, E. J. “Metaphysical nihilism and the subtraction argument”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New
Series n. 273, 2002, p. 62-73.
Paseau, Alexander. “The subtraction argument does not add up”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series
n. 273, 2002, p. 73-75.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. “What`s in a contrast class?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273,
2002, p. 75-84.
Raatikainen, Panu. “Deflationism and Gödel`s theorem – a comment on Gauker”. Analysis, v. 62,
n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 85-87.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Anti-individualism and analyticity”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n.
273, 2002, p. 87-91.
Ketland, Jeffrey. “Hume = Small Hume”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 92-93.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002
Lewis, David. “Tharp`s third theorem”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 95-97.
Miller, Alexander. “Wright`s argument against error-theories”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series
n. 274, 2002, p. 98-103.
Nelkin, Dana K. & Rickless, Samuel C. “Warfield`s new argument for incompatibilism”.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 104-107.
Slater, B. H. “Syntactic liars”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 107-109.
Morton, Adam. “If you`re so smart why are you ignorant? Epistemic causal paradoxes”. Analysis,
v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 110-116.
Frances, Bryan. “A test for theories of belief ascription”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274,
2002, p. 116-125.
MacBride, Frase. “Could nothing matter?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 125135.
Tennant, Neil. “Victor vanquished”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 135-142.
Brogaard, Berit & Salerno, Joe. “Clues to the paradox of knowability: reply to Dummett and
Tennant”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 143-150.
Tye, Michael. “On the location of a pain”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 150153.
Noordhof, Paul. “More in pain”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 153-154.
Chalmers, David J. “The St. Petersburg two-envelope paradox”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series
n. 274, 2002, p. 155-157.
Chase, James. “The non-probabilistic two envelope paradox”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n.
274, 2002, p. 157-160.
Everett, Anthony. “Predelli on procrastination”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p.
160-166.
Rosenthal, David M. “Moore`s paradox and Crimmins`s case”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series
n. 274, 2002, p. 167-171.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Metaphysical nihilism defended: reply to Lowe and Paseau”.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 172-180.
Dworkin, Gerald. “Patients and prisoners: the ethics of lethal injection” Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New
Series n. 274, 2002, p. 181-189.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002
Tooley, Michael. “Backward causation and the Stalnaker-Lewis approach to counterfactuals”.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 191-197.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Williamson on the primeness of knowing”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New
Series n. 275, 2002, p. 197-202.
Hudson, Hud. “Moving faster than light”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 203205.
Teller, Paul. “The rotating disk argument and Humean supervenience: cutting the Gordian knot”.
205-210.
Meyer, Ulrich. “Prior and the Platonist”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 211216.
Stone, Jim. “Why sortal essentialism cannot solve Chrysippus`s. puzzle”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3,
New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 216-223.
O`Neill, John. “Lewis and the flawed nihilist”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p.
223-225.
Mackie, Penelope. “Deep contingency and necessary a posteriori truth”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3,
New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 225-236.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Refuse disposal”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 236241.
Hawthorne, John. “Lewis, the lottery and the preface”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275,
2002, p. 242-251.
Beebee, Helen. “Contingent laws rule: reply to Bird”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275,
2002, p. 252-255.
Psillos, Stathis. “Salt soes dissolve in water, but not necessarily”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New
Series n. 275, 2002, p. 255-257.
Bird, Alexander. “On whether some laws are necessary”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275,
2002, p. 257-270.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002
Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie. “Indexicality, binding, anaphora and a priori truth”.
Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 271-281.
Lange, Marc. “Baseball, pessimistic inductions and the turnover fallacy”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4,
New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 281-285.
Recanati, Francois. “The Fodorian Fallacy”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p.
285-289.
Sayward, Charles. “Convention T and Basic Law V”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276,
2002, p. 289-291.
Dorr, Cian. “Sleeping Beauty: in defence of Elga”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002,
p. 292-296.
Wiland, Eric. “On the rationality of desiring the forbidden”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n.
276, 2002, p. 296-299.
Beali, Jc. “Deflactionism and gaps: untying not`s in the debate”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series
n. 276, 2002, p. 299-305.
Meyer, Ulrich. “Is science first-order?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 305307.
Weatherson, Brian. “Misleading indexicals”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p.
308-310.
Predelli, Stefano. “Intentions, indexicals and communication”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series
n. 276, 2002, p. 310-316.
Gillett, Carl. “The dimensions of realization: a critique of the Standard view”. Analysis, v. 62, n.
4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 316-323.
Shipley, G. J. “Imagination and fission futures”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p.
324-327.
Rieger, Adam. “Pardox without Basic Law V: a problem with Frege`s ontology”. Analysis, v. 62,
n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 327-330.
Kremer, Michael. “Intuitive consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4,
New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 330-336.
Joyce, Richard. “Expressivism and motivation internalism”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n.
276, 2002, p. 336-344.
Freidman, Kennth S. “A small infinite puzzle”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p.
344-345.
Blck, Robert. “Solution of a small infinite puzzle”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002,
p. 345-346.
Index to Volume 62. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 347.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003
Sanford, David H. “Fusion confusion”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 1-4.
Parsons, Josh. “A-theory for tense logicans”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 46.
Ketland, Jeffrey. “On Wrigth`s inductive definition of coherence truth for arithmetic”. Analysis,
v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 6-15.
Worley, Sara. “Conceivability, possibility and physicalism”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n.
277, 2003, p. 15-23.
Bradley, Darren & Fitelson, Branden. “Monty Hall, Doomsday and confirmation”. Analysis, v.
63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 23-31.
Goldstein, Laurenc. “Farewell to Grelling” Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 3132.
Sullivan, Peter M. “A note on incompleteness and heterologicality”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New
Series n. 277, 2003, p. 32-38.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “On our alleged a priori knowledge that water exists”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1,
New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 38-41.
Brueckner, Anthony. “The coherence of scepticism about self-knowledge” Analysis, v. 63, n. 1,
New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 41-48.
Brown, James Robert. “Science and constructive mathematics”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series
n. 277, 2003, p. 48-51.
Papineau, David. “Why you don’t want to get in the box with Schrödinger`s cat”. Analysis, v. 63,
n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 51-58.
Yi, Byeong-Uk. “Wright and Suárez on the Verification Principle”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New
Series n. 277, 2003, p. 58-61.
Bringsjord, Selmer & van Heuveln, Bran. “The “mental eye” defence of an infinitized version of
Yablo`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 61-70.
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Scanlon`s contractualism and the redundancy objection”. Analysis, v. 63,
n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 70-76.
Smith, Michael & Stoljar, Daneil. “Is there a Lockean argument against expressivism?” Analysis,
v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 76-86.
Jackson, Frank & Pettit, Philip. “Locke, expressivism, conditionals”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New
Series n. 277, 2003, p. 86-92.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003
Noë, Alva. Causation and perception: the puzzle unravelled. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n.
278, 2003, p. 93-100.
Rayo, Agustín. “When does “everything” mean everything?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n.
278, 2003, p. 100-106.
Barker, Stephen & Dowe, Phi. “Paradoxes of multi-location”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n.
278, 2003, p. 106-114.
McCall, Storrs & Lowe, E. J. “3D/4D equivalence, the twins paradox and absolute time”.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 114-123.
Pérez Laraudogoitia, Jon. “A variant of Benardete`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n.
278, 2003, p. 124-131.
Lycan, William G. & Ryder, Zena. “The loneliness of the long-distance truck driver”. Analysis, v.
63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 132-136.
Vision, Gerald. “Lest we forget “the correspondence theory of truth” Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New
Series n. 278, 2003, p. 136-141.
Wenar, Leif. “Epistemc rights and legal rights”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p.
142-146.
Smilansky, Saul. “Choice-egalitarianism and the paradox of the baseline”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2,
New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 146-151.
Buen, Otávio & Colyvan, Mark. “Pardox without satisfaction”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series
n. 278, 2003, p. 152-156.
Noordhof, Paul. “Tooley on backward causation”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003,
p. 157-162.
Read, Stephen. “Freeing assumptions from the Liar paradox”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n.
278, 2003, p. 162-166.
Denyer, Nicholas. “Rieger`s problem with Frege`s ontology”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n.
278, 2003, p. 166-169.
Fitzgerals, Henry. “Nominalist things”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 170171.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003
Fricke, Martin F. & Snowdon, Paul. “Solidity and impediment”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series
n. 279, 2003, p. 173-178.
Weintraub, Ruth. “The time of a killing”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 178182.
Nichols, Shaun. “Imagination and the puzzles of iteration”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n.
279, 2003, p. 182-187.
Steiner, Hillel & Wolf, Jonathan. “A general framework for resolving disputed land claims”.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 188-189.
Knobe, Joshua. “Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3,
New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 190-194.
Fitelson, Branden. “A probabilistic theory of coherence”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279,
2003, p. 194-199.
Monton, Bradley. “Presentists can believe in closed timelike curves”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New
Series n. 279, 2003, p. 199-202.
Sawyer, Sarah. “Sufficient absences”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 202-208.
Weatphal, Janthan. “A new way with the Consequence Argument, and the fixity to the laws”.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 208-212.
Noonan, Harold W. “A flawed argument for perdurance”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n.
279, 2003, p. 213-215.
Aranyosi, István. “(Con)fusing the un(con)fusable”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279,
2003, p. 215-220.
Bird, Alexander. “Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series
n. 279, 2003, p. 221-228.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts: reply to Bird”.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 229-237.
Yi, Byeong-Uk. “Newcomb`s pardox and Priest`s prince`le of rational choice”. Analysis, v. 63, n.
3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 237-242.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Examining boxing and toxin”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279,
2003, p. 242-244.
Fischer, John Martin. “Ought-implies-can”, causal determinism and moral responsibility”.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 244-250.
Bruckner, Anthony. “Not wanting to know”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p.
250-256.
T.Cook, Roy. “Still counterintuitive: a reply to Kremer”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279,
2003, p. 257-261.
Hanfling, Oswald. “A Gettier drama”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 262-263.
Smith, Peter. “Constructivism expoded?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 263266.
Bradley, Darren. “Sleeping Beauty: a note on Dorr`s argument for 1/3”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3,
New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 266-268.
Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003
Stanley, Jason. “Context, interest relativity and the sorites”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n.
280, 2003, p. 269-280.
Milne, Peter. “Bayesianism v. scientific realism”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003,
p. 281-288.
Stone, Jim. “On staying the same”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 288-291.
Ketland, Jeffrey “Can a many-valued language functionally represent its own semantics?”
Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 292-297.
Moretti, Luca “Why the Converse Consequence Condition cannot be accepted”. Analysis, v. 63,
n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 297-300.
Milne, Peter “The simplest Lewis-style triviality proof yet?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n.
280, 2003, p. 300-303.
Brueckner, Anthony. “What missed clues cases show”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280,
2003, p. 303-305.
Sanford, David H. “Reply to Mr. Aranyosi”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p.
305-308.
McDaniel, Kris. “No paradox of multi-location”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003,
p. 309-311.
Beebee, Helen & Rush, Michael. “Non-paradoxical multi-location”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New
Series n. 280, 2003, p. 311-316.
FitzPatrick, William J. “Acts, intentions, and moral permissibility: indefence of the doctrine of
double effect”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 317-321.
Watherson, Brian. “Nine objections to Steiner and Wolff on land disputes”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4,
New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 321-327.
McNaughton, David & Rawling, Piers. “Can Scanlon avoid redundancy by passing the buck?”
Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 328-331.
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Scanlon, permissions, and redundancy: response to McNaughton and
Rawling”. 332-337.
Ridge, Michael. “Contractualism and the new and improved redundancy objection”. Analysis, v.
63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 337-342.
Index to Volume. 63. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 343.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004
Olum, Ken D. “Conflict between anthropic reasoning and observation”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1,
New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 1-8.
Weintraub, Ruth. “Sleeping Beauty: a simple solution”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281,
2004, p. 8- 10.
Horgan, Terry. “Sleeping Beauty awakened: new odds at the dawn of the new day”. Analysis, v.
64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 10-21.
Nerlich, Graham. “How the twins do it: STR and the clock paradox”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New
Series n. 281, 2004, p. 21-29.
Beall, Jc. & Ripley, David. “Analetheism and dialetheism”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n.
281, 2004, p. 30-35.
Warfield, Ted A. “When epistemic closure does and does not fail: a lesson from the history of
epistemology”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 35-41.
Breckner, Anthony. “Brewer on the McKinsey problem”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281,
2004, p. 41-43.
Gertler, Brie. “We can`t know a priori that H2O exists. But can we know that water does?”
Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 44-47.
Noordhof, Paul. “Outsmarting the McKinsey-Brown argument?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series
n. 281, 2004, p. 48-56.
Brown, Jessica. “Wright on transmission failure”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004,
p. 57-67.
Rosenkranz, Sven. “Fitch back in action again?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p.
67-71.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “The Bundle Theory is compatible with distinct but indiscernible
particulars”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 72-81.
J Corlett,. Angelo. “Evi”l. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 81-83.
Dreier, James. “Lockean and logical truth conditions”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281,
2004, p. 84-91.
Noonan, Harold W. “Against absence-dependent thoughts”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n.
281, 2004, p. 92-93.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004
Benthem, Johan Van. “What one may come to know”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282,
2004, p. 95-105.
Timmermann, Jens. “The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers”.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 106-112.
Read, Stephen. “Identity and harmony”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 113119.
Rayo, Agustín. “Frege`s correlation”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 119-122.
Bourne, Craig. “Future contingents, non-contradiction, and the law of excluded middle muddle”.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 122-128.
Uzquiano, Gabriel. “An infinitary paradox of denotation”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n.
282, 2004, p. 128-131.
Noonan, Harold W. “Are there vague objects?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p.
131-134.
Bermúdez, José Luis. “Vagueness, phenomenal concepts and mind-brain identity”. Analysis, v.
64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 134-138.
Samir Okasha: “Wright on the transmission of support: a Bayesian analysis”. Analysis, v. 64, n.
2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 139-146.
Kistler, Max. “Some problems for Lowe`s four-category ontology”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New
Series n. 282, 2004, p. 146-151.
Lowe, E. J. “The four-category ontology: reply to Kistler”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n.
282, 2004, p. 152-157.
Tappenden, Paul. “The ins and outs of Schrôdinger`s cat box: a response to Papineau. Analysis, v.
64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 157-164.
Ketland, Jaffrey. “Bueno and Colyvan on Yablo`s paradox.” Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n.
282, 2004, p. 165-172.
Adams, Fred & Steadman, Annie. “Intentional action in ordinary language: core concept or
pragmatic understanding?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 173-181.
Knobe, Joshua. “Intention, intentional action and moral considerations”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2,
New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 181-187.
McKay, Phyllos. “Newcomb`s problem: the causalists get rich”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series
n. 282, 2004, p. 187-189.
Seibel, Mark. “On Fitelson`s measure of coherence”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282,
2004, p. 189-190.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004
Poidevin, Robin Le. “Space, supervenience and substantivalism”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New
Series n. 283, 2004, p. 191-198.
Brabbon-Mitchell, David. “How do we know it is now now?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n.
283, 2004, p. 199-203.
Miller, Kristie. “The twins` paradox and temporal passage”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n.
283, 2004, p. 203-206.
Katzav, Joel. “Dispositions and the principle of lest action”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n.
283, 2004, p. 206-214.
Borg, Emma. “Formal semantics and intentional states”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283,
2004, p. 215-223.
Crawford, Sean. “A solution for Russellians to a puzzle about belief”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New
Series n. 283, 2004, p. 223-229.
Recanatyi, Francois. “That” -clauses as existential quantifiers”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series
n. 283, 2004, p. 229-235.
Braddon-Mitchell, David & Miller, Kristie. “The loneliness of stages”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New
Series n. 283, 2004, p. 235-242.
Burke, Michael B. “Doin, Thoen, and many-thikers problem”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n.
283, 2004, p. 242-250.
Jacquette, Dale. “Grelling`s revenge”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 251-256.
Campbell, Scott. “Rapid psychological chance”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p.
256-264.
Nathan, N. M. L. “Stoics and sceptics: a reply to Brueckner”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n.
283, 2004, p. 264-268.
Adams, Fred & Steadman, Annie. “Intentional action and moral considerations: still pragmatic”.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 268-276.
Nadelhoffer, Thomas. “The Butler problem revisited”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283,
2004, p. 277-284.
Bou-Habib, Paul & Olsaretti, Serena. “Lands disputes and auctions: a response to Steiner and
Wolff”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 284-287.
Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004
Morton, Adam. “Indicative versus subjunctive in future conditionals”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New
Series n. 284, 2004, p. 289-293.
Morton, Adam. “Against the Ramsey test”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 294299.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity”. Analysis,
v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 299-309.
MacBride, Fraser. “Can structuralism solve the “access” problem?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New
Series n. 284, 2004, p. 309-317.
Whittle, Bruno. “Dialetheism, logical consequence and hierarchy”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New
Series n. 284, 2004, p. 318-326.
Ehring, Douglas. “Distinguishing universals from particulars”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series
n. 284, 2004, p. 326-332.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Strategies for refuting closure for knowledge”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New
Series n. 284, 2004, p. 333-335.
Israel, Rami. “Two interpretations of “grue” -or how to misunderstand the new riddle of
induction”. 335-339.
Brown, Jessica. “Non-inferential justification and epistemic circularity”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4,
New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 339-348.
Williams, John N. “Moore`s paradoxes, Evans`s principle and self-knowledge”. Analysis, v. 64,
n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 348-353.
Sawyer, Sarah. “Absences, presences and sufficient conditions”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series
n. 284, 2004, p. 354-357.
Forrest, Peter. “The real but dead past: a reply to Braddon-Mitchell”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New
Series n. 284, 2004, p. 358-362.
Ellis, Jonathan. “Context, indexicals and the sorites”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284,
2004, p. 362-364.
Parsons, Josh. “The Eleatic hangover cure”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p.
364-366.
Index to Volume 64. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 367.