The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 The Open University Walton Hall, Milton Keynes Catering Strategy Executive Summary November 2000 The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Executive Summary Consumer Led Catering This paper is written to detail the catering brief set by the Estates Department at the Open University and the process, research, analysis and proposed strategy recommended by The Russell Partnership in response to that brief. The Brief The Open University Estates Department commissioned The Russell Partnership to answer the following questions: • How many food outlets should there be on campus • Where should these outlets be • What style and price range should they operate within Throughout the last ten years, the Russell Partnership have pioneered a consumer led approach to catering strategy, and have developed a Catering Retail Model to direct and support the process of consumer focus. The Process The foundation of consumer led catering is understanding and delighting the customer, thus the process must commence with detailed consumer research to create an accurate and complete information base. Thorough analysis follows, creating clarity of understanding and the required actions to satisfy the consumer needs. It is then, and only then, that a consumer led strategy can be developed. The agreed strategy can be clearly followed by product development, implementation and production. This process is in stark contrast with traditional catering methodology where production capacity leads the consumer! The catering retail model as applied to the Open University necessitates four levels of research: desk, quantitative, qualitative and site analysis. Each will have a marked impact on the final output. Research analysis provides preferred choice, volume and frequency of use. The site analysis establishes market constraints and volume potential. With this knowledge established, market focus, segmentation, outlet styles, unit size, price and locations can be recognised. On completion, the structural alignment of the operating departments needs to be addressed in order to meet the acknowledged new challenges. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Desk Research The desk research undertaken has evaluated three prime sources of data. The research reports analysed were National Trends to the Year 2005, The National Lunchtime Report (which was conducted in Great Britain by RSGB 15th - 18th March 2000 as part of a nationwide general omnibus survey of 2,000 adults) and historical research undertaken by QA Research for the Open University in 1997. Each report provides an essential element in formulating the style and food offer required at Walton Hall campus. Below we summarise the key findings of each report. The National Trends document is split into three key areas of research: The Future Market, Catering Requirements of the Diner and the Future Demands on the Operator. The growth in travel and the explosion of retail choice has led to a highly educated customer when it comes to food and drink. The market is in a state of dynamic flux, with change occurring at an ever-faster rate. Casual, simple dining are the key 'buzz' words. Branding is well established and it will only grow over the forthcoming years. Diner requirements are changing. We no longer need to be hungry to eat, the dining experience counts, the environment has to be fun, and we wish to be in control of the pace of dining. The ease of purchase coupled with the need for value are overriding in the diner's requirements. All day speciality coffee and healthy options are essential. For the operator, the pressure is growing. There is a need to understand the market, provide fresh produce, invest in people and create a fun and interesting environment. The Lunchtime Report provides further clarity on spend parameters, uptake and offer. The report supports the previous items of research summarised. Average lunch breaks taken in the year 2000 are 36 minutes; average spends £1.98, with 60% of all adults taking lunch. The major food item consumed at lunch was a sandwich, with just under a 50% uptake. Lunch was still seen as a snack with 86% of the respondents identifying their main meal was in the evening. The popular food offers included sandwiches, salads, soup, pasta, pies, snacks and yoghurts. In February 1997, QA Research was commissioned to review the on-site catering at the Walton Hall campus. The aim of the research was to assess staff attitudes towards the catering provision. Key findings were: Over 75% of respondents were on-site users; convenience and social reasons were prime drivers to use but users were most dissatisfied with decor and ambience. Value for money and overall satisfaction were perceived as average. The most cited reason for non-use was price, and over 75% claimed cheaper prices and better value would encourage usage. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Quantitative Research An electronic questionnaire, designed to span diet, catering requirements, outlets used, frequency of use, reasons for visit and average spends, was distributed to all on-line users on site. 350 responses were received, which was an excellent response and demonstrated the interest generated by catering on site. Respondents were requested to grade all catering outlets on campus using a score from 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent). The following key conclusions were recorded. The main Refectory received the lowest score in four of the eight criteria evaluated; ratings were particularly poor for both price and value. There were no redeeming factors. The Open University Shop scored particularly low on price and value; the only criteria rating above average was service. The Beale Suite rated highly on environment, however it received a very low volume uptake. Venables was midrange on all criteria evaluations except food and drink selection, which, along with that of the Berrill Cafe were rated particularly badly. The Beale Bistro received praise for quality of product and staff and environment, however, once again, price and value were rated as poor. The Cellar Bar was the one unit that received evaluated comments over 5 for all eight criteria, scoring particularly well on service staff, and receiving the highest evaluation for selection of drinks on campus! The Pavilion received a consistency of evaluation (c 6.0) with staff rating highly. The BBC Restaurant was the only outlet on site to receive evaluations in all criteria of 6.5 and over; the unit received the highest rated venue on 5 of the eight criteria. The evaluation of environment was particularly high against other venues. The research highlighted sandwiches, jacket potatoes, salads, hot meals, vegetarian offers and soup as the key food requirements. To conclude, the evaluations on all counts were very low, demonstrating widespread disappointment and dissatisfaction with price, value, service and environment. The units scoring lowest were units operated by the contract caterer on site - Baxter and Platts. This highlights the need to re-evaluate the caterer on site and the nature of the contract in operation. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Qualitative Research Eight focus groups lasting one hour were held with internal members of staff over a twoday period. Fifty-six people in total took part, covering all Open University levels. All respondents were encouraged to convey their views on current and future catering arrangements on campus, covering aspects such as pricing, environment, quality of offer, future requirements and service levels. High occurrences of common issues were raised which are detailed below. Convenience of location was a key driver to usage, with consumers highlighting that a period of 3 minutes was the maximum they were prepared to travel to a single outlet. Good quality food was the only reason to increase this time restriction. This travelling time restriction is also compounded by the fact that once at the outlet, queuing time can be excessive. This essential element of the delivery system requires a major overhaul. A high percentage of diners used the same outlet on a regular basis, indicating habit dining. The convenience of location was supported by the fact that consumers will combine catering with activities such as a visit to the book fair, shop or a social activity. The current food offer was perceived as poor value, poor quality, with poor service and characterised by queues. The volume and ferocity of comment was overwhelming. The general environment was described as clearly cramped and depressing. The consumer preferred to eat at the desk, or in some cases, the car! Price was seen to be a rip off. The majority of the customers questioned felt that the offers on site catered for a 'captive market'. The majority felt that they used the facilities through necessity and had to 'put up with' what was on offer. Many felt, however, that there was an "opportunity waiting to be grasped" With reference to the future offer, sandwiches, healthy options, pasta and pizza received high acclaim. High Street brands were not seen as the solution with perceptions of high price and junk food. The perception of a captive market may be diminished by the implementation of a brand philosophy, which will reap the benefits of increased consumer confidence and improved perception of price. If in-house brands are introduced fully (with the benefits detailed later in this summary) and that product pricing is not increased, value perception will improve, as consumers' expectations are that branded products carry a higher price tag. There is an apparent need to move away from all units offering the same products. The service staff were also highly criticised as disorganised, under-resourced, unhelpful and rude. The delivered service offer rated very poorly with comments such as "It's a joke", "It's awful", "We buy in from outside" and "It frequently doesn't arrive". The product offering on site was seen as inferior to that on offer on the high street, and a growing vegetarian/healthy requirement was apparently not being met. In conclusion, it is rare to receive such overwhelmingly negative comment relating to all aspects of catering. The consumer is now significantly more dissatisfied than in 1997, and urgent change is required across all areas of product, service and environment. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Site Analysis A frequent and sustained series of operational visits were made to all on-site locations. We would make the following observations: The site displays uniformity of offer, price, presentation and style. The current approach is trying to meet a wide span of appeal - a scattergun tactic, trying to be everything to everyone. We would propose a strategic shift to develop a collection of niche products, with clear identity and differentiation to appeal to a targeted group of consumers - a rifle gun strategy. This proposal is driven by the clear segmentation of customer's needs, unit usage/price ranges, identified within the qualitative and quantitative research. An attitude demonstrating 'lack of ownership' predominated in many outlets: slow table clearing; low levels of team working, lack of pride and motivation were evident. A major customer care programme is required to attempt to resolve this low morale. With consumers seeking increased choice, their increased awareness of image, and clear market segmentation, brands are here and here to stay. All new on-site development must follow brand design philosophy. The research clearly segments the market and highlights the urgent need for brand implementation. It also clearly rejects the import of high street brand names, for fear of inferior products and inflated high street prices. Thus, in-house brands must be developed, designed and implemented. The common elements of the brands will include simple, limited but distinctive menus, strong decorative theme (covering every visual aspect of the operation), the them carried through to the signage, a number of unique selling points, and agreed standards of performance. Areas of investment will include marketing, kitchen/specialist equipment, refurbishment, crockery, cutlery, glassware, uniforms, menus, signage and printing. The operation displays an outdated cost margin driven approach to pricing. The necessity to shift to a retail approach to pricing must be recognised and implemented if optimum revenue and maximum cash margin are to be achieved. Included in our research findings is a section on the use of menu engineering - a step by step process through which management can evaluate current and future menu pricing, design and content decisions. The menu engineering approach requires that attention be focused on three critical elements - customer demand, menu mix and contribution margin. The concept requires management to focus on the number of pounds that a menu item contributes to profitability, not to merely monitor cost percentages. When margin is the difference between revenue (i.e. delivered from volume and spend) and costs (driven by agreed quality of products and services offered), the opportunity to increase margin rests with the ability to change volume, spend or costs. Operational analysis would support the view that staff and operating costs are at a minimum (in some cases below acceptable levels). Minimal opportunities are available to reduce costs; the opportunity is in volume and spending growth. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 With the quantitative and qualitative knowledge of on-site price sensitivity, price increases only provide minimal opportunities to increase revenue growth. An external price validation exercise was completed to establish price comparisons. This highlights that the internal market displays lower prices than the high street. It should be noted, however, that value is seen as very low. Therefore, volume is the vehicle remaining to influence margin. Later in this summary, volume growth opportunities are explored - they reflect the increase in current usage to reach the potential market. We would understand that future growth would need to result from the exploration of improved volume market. Inconsistent operating standards on site are widespread, with a multitude of operators, the Club, the contractor and many one-off delivered services. There is a need to curb 'bought-in services', many of which were seen to arrive in the back of cars, breaking all hygiene and health and safety legislation. The Club offer would also 'better fit' under the central catering ownership, providing an opportunity to control/develop advertising, promotion and maximise staff utilisation. The catering service on site needs an urgent revolution to create a product and service compliant with the needs of the consumer in the year 2000. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Financial Evaluation The figures supplied by Baxter and Platts show annual revenue of circa £500k, including delivered services/functions of circa £250k. A food gross margin of 50%, a wage cost of circa £175k and operating costs of circa £45k provide an estimated profit of £30k to Baxter and Platts. If the revenue figures are accurate, this would create an average spend per person per day ranging from 23p throughout the summer, 29p through October to December and 27p January to June. This figure is exceptionally low when compared to empirical daily average spends of c£2.20. A menu mix and costing exercise was carried out on a selection of items, the outcome of which would suggest the current achievable margin is closer to 60% than 50%. The figures supplied have therefore been viewed with caution. A basic financial model has been developed based on empirical data and on-site research, the outcome of which generates a potential revenue of £1.4 million and operating profit of £175.000. This excludes an allowance for management fees. The potential financial strength supports the view that the existing operator is significantly under-performing and that the current contract style of a nil cost is inappropriate. The operation should be put out to tender and a new Cost Plus performance guarantee contract be put in place. Model Outputs With the research and detailed analysis in place, and the consumer needs understood, the model outputs of number of units, locations, styles and price range can be calculated. Unit Configuration The ideal number of units on a given site is driven by potential volume spend and customer flow patterns - the two are inseparable. When establishing the ideal number of units, understanding peak volume and designing to meet those needs is imperative. At the Open University, this peak is throughout lunch service - 12.00 14.00 hours. It is this peak volume that is the base to establish optimum outlet numbers. A historical customer penetration exercise (current consumer uptake as a factor of total consumer population) provides the present market uptake. Current penetration is extremely low at the Walton Hall campus; daily penetration levels are as low as 29%. The research undertaken would suggest uptake to be low because of the extremely poor quality of product, service and environment, outdated delivery systems and the lack of designated social seating space. Using the same research, post the creation of acceptable quality of product, service and environment, and applying generic national statistics, a projected peak penetration can be calculated. This figure stands at 60% - almost a 250% increase on current uptake. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 This volume uptake drives the financial projections, demonstrating the commercial opportunity of catering on site. Overlaying realistic spend patterns on this volume projection an annual revenue in excess of £1.4m is achievable (current revenue £500k). These figures assume no volume or spend growth in delivered services of function business, an area that is currently highly under-developed. The penetration exercise confirms circa 2150 as the maximum potential lunch volume. To calculate the ideal number of outlets, spend and movement patterns need to be overlaid on the volume projections. Research supports an average lunch spend of 62.00. This spend would support the majority of food consumed will be light snacks, sandwiches and hand-held meals as opposed to formal dining. On-site consumer movement patterns would support the development of a central Food Hub as opposed to the creation of additional outlying satellite units. This concept is further informed by researched consumer preference. The central Food Hub development also maximises staff utilisation, production capacity and facilitates de-skilling where possible. Thus, it is proposed that the outlying units remain, providing 335 covers, and a new central Food Hub is created to cater for the balance of the lunch cover volume. An additional 95 covers are required, plus extensive open, social and meeting space. It is assumed that the outlying areas will also go through a brand and service delivery makeover to ensure increased volume management capacity is deliverable. Price Range The National Lunch Report supports a lunch spend of 62.00 and this is further reinforced by the local qualitative and quantitative research undertaken. The price on campus is inelastic. A minimal price increase will result in extreme volume shortfall. The current spend threshold is low, driven by low quality of product, service and environment, however, the research suggests following increased quality delivery, menu price increases will be acceptable in time. A local price comparison exercise was undertaken at units visited by Open University staff. In 90% of cases, competitive pricing was higher than the on-site offer, demonstrating the consumer's flexibility to increase their spending if quality and environment are acceptable. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Proposed Ideal Food Model The future ideal catering model reflects and responds to the identified researched needs. The following pictorial pages illustrate the current and the proposed style of offer. The illustration denotes Unit Location, Food Concept, Theme, Model, Operating Buzz, Theatre and Seating The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Key Elements of the Proposed Strategy A strategy to drive a revolution in catering A customer driven, not production led, strategy A strategy built on understanding market opportunities Outlets designed to manage diversity A policy in place to drive consistency not uniformity The use of menu and market engineering The development of in-house product and food brands An opportunity for staff to develop ownership The implementation of intelligent IT/IS systems A rifle not shotgun marketing approach One single operator on site, operating in partnership with the Open University Formulation & development of a strategy to reap the opportunities of the latent demand for conference and function business within the geographical area A strategy to meet future growth of population on site The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 A Vision for the Future The clear vision is a collection of highly targeted, niche brands delivering efficient service and management with a consistent product, to a well understood and informed market. The Russell Partnership The Open University - Catering Strategy - November 2000 Next Steps In order to develop this strategy, the following actions need to be undertaken. Design and develop a central Food Hub with attention paid to social space. Procure a new and exclusive catering contract. Brand and makeover outlying outlets Take over operation & ownership of the Shop Introduce menu engineering. Develop a culture of ownership via tailored reward packages. Review and design a holistic conference and banqueting sales and marketing strategy. Introduce a retail awareness programme to all operating units and personnel. Introduce an appropriate management information system for catering outlets. Sell the strategy to stakeholders. Develop a financial business case/plan for all new developments. The Russell Partnership