1 NEUTRON PROBLEMS OF REACTOR-PUMPED LASER SYSTEMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENT Andrey V. Gulevich, Alexander P. Barzilov, Genady A. Bezhunov, Peter P. Dyachenko, Oleg A. Elovsky, Oleg F.Kukharchuk, Genady N.Fokin, Eugeny A. Pashin, Yury A. Prokhorov, Pavel A.Yakubov, Anatoly V. Zrodnikov Institute for Physics & Power Engineering 1. Bondarenko Sq., Obninsk, Kaluga reg. RUSSIA, 249020 Lately, a coupled reactor systems have been widely used in reactor physics. In particular, systems of a coupled burst reactor with a subcritical module provide the opportunity to expand the sphere of application for the standard pulse reactors. It is presumed that a similar facility, consisting of a fast burst reactor together with a thermal subcritical laser module, could be used to make inertial confinement fusion realization possible Ref.[1]. It is important to note that such a system has to operate in the mode of high power of prompt neutron pulses Theoretical and experimental investigation of fundamental processes of neutron transport, as well as the nuclear safety of system described are the important and challenging problems of modern reactor and neutron physics. The basic element of this concept is the nuclear pumped amplifier (NPA). A twincore “Bars-6” fast burst reactor is used as the ignition module (see. Fig1). The reactor parameters are as follows: dimensions of active cores - 220 x 220 mm; distance between cores - 1500 mm; number of fissions in two cores - 51017; pulse duration - 40 s [4]. The laser module (LM) is a cylindrical structure sized to provide the space required for housing the two cores of reactor module and the other components of the system see Fig.2. The diameter of laser module is 1700 mm, and the length is 2500 mm. The LM consists of the laser active elements (LAEL’s), LAEL imitators and neutron moderator elements. The laser module is surrounded by the two rows of neutron reflector elements as shown in Fig.2. Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 2 Figure 1. The twin-core fast burst reactor. Figure 2. The laser module. The LAEL assembly consists of a thin-wall stainless steel tube 50 mm in outer diameter and 2500 mm in length and whose internal surface is coated with ~ 5 mm thick uranium-235 metal and includes optical windows filled with a laser active medium. ArXe mixture (200:1), at approximately normal pressure, is used as a laser active medium and has been chosen for this application because it is the medium mostly used in studies performed at the present time. The internal reflector consists of a thin-wall stainless tube with paraffin. If required, the NPA could be provided with an internal neutron reflector of up to 7 cm thick. The NPA functions as follows. Neutrons from the ignition reactor passing through the LM are moderated and induce a chain fission reaction of uranium-235 in the coating of LAEL. The fission fragments captured in Ar-Xe mixture induce plasmas so that the inversion population of Xe1 levels corresponds to the laser transition with wavelength 1.73 m. The energy stored in the inversion population is extracted from laser module by the optical system of the model. Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 3 Calculation performed show that, in the case where all of the imitators are replaced with LAEL’s (650 units) the energy of the model laser pulse can reach to the couple of tens kilojoules for the pumping pulse duration ~ 10 ms. The system involved has a couple of peculiarities in neutron sense such as: 1) great difference in the spektra of fast burst reactor (average neutron lifetime is ~ 10-8s) and thermal laser module (average neutron lifetime is ~ 10-4s); 2) large leakage of neutron (~ 40%) from the system; 3) space-time distribution of neutron flux within the LM may be changed during the pumping pulse; 4) complicated geometry of the system; the sizes of the basic construction elements may vary from 5 m up to 2.5 meters. To overcome this difficulties Monte-Carlo MMKFK code was chosen for neuron simulation. Because of strongly marked space and power separation of the system elements, the nonstationary neutron transport processes in the coupled system can be described mathematically in terms of the kinetic models of coupled reactors - point and space distribution models. There are several formulations for these models, the better known are described in Refs. [2,3]. The mathematical model for the reactor-laser system dynamics was developed using as the basis the modified neutron kinetic model of Refs.[3], the equations for feedback coupling processes in reactor cores, and the equations for determining the cores reactivity. For this case the equations of modified integral kinetic model are listed below: Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 4 t r rr rb r N 1 (t) 11 (t - ) + 11 (t - ) N 1 ( )d 0 t t rr rb rs 12 (t - ) + 12 (t - ) N 2r ( )d 11 (t - )S1 ( )d 0 0 t r rr rb r N (t) 2 22 (t - ) + 22 (t - ) N 2 ( )d 0 t t rr rb rs 21 (t - ) + 21 (t - ) N 1r ( )d + 22 (t - )S2 ( )d 0 0 t t br r br r N b (r , t) G1 (r , t - )N 1 ( )d G2 (r , t - )N 2 ( )d 0 0 (1) Here: N ri (t ) , Si ( ) - fission rate and external neutron source intensity in i-th core for a time moment t, respectively; N b (r , t ) - the space distributed power of laser module for time moment t; rr ij (t - ) - the distribution of secondary fissions in i-th core for time moment t (the condition being that the first fission was initiated in j-th core at a moment time ); riis (t - ) - the analogous function for neutrons from the external source with intensity Si () ; rijb (t - ) - the distribution of secondary fissions for time moment t in i-th core initiated by fissions in a laser module; G br i (r , t - ) - the space distribution of all fissions in the laser module for time moment t - mathematical analog of Green rs rb function. Note that the calculation of functions rr ij (t - ) , ii (t - ) , ij (t - ) , G br i (r , t - ) is performed only once. This model was tested in the experiments on the Universal Critical Facility (UCF) (see. Fig.3). Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 5 Figure 3. Universal Critical Facility. 1 - central multiplicative zone; 2,3 - internal neutron reflector; 4 - external multiplicative zone; 5 - neutron reflector UCF is the neutron analog of coupled reactor laser system, which consist of central uranium critical zone and external subcritical zone. Theoretical and experimental study was to estimate the nonstationary neutron flux within the external zone from the pulsed neutron generator (with the output 108n/impuls and duration ~ 1s), which had been placed into the central zone. Comparison of some experimental and simulation results are displayed in the Fig.4 a,b. N, rel.unit N, rel.unit Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 6 Ni , . . N - exper . - exper. - cul c. - cu l c. a , s 0.0000 0.0010 0.0020 ,s s 0.0000 0.0004 0.0008 0.0012 a) b) Figure 4. Time-dependent distributions of neutron flux: a) in the external zone ( no internal zone); b) in the external zone ( with internal zone) The model (1) was also used for the simulation of neutron kinetics of pulsed reactor BARS-6 and system «BARS-6 with LM». The simplified analytical formula for the estimation of a power pulse of BARS type reactor is following N r t Er t 2 exp 2 . r r Here Er and r - represent the total energy and effective pulse duration respectively. The results of the mathematical simulation using the computer code TRENAGER BARS-6 and analytical formula for the nominal neutron pulse are presented in the fig.5 in comparison with the experimental data. The parameters of mathematical model and the main neutron-physical characteristics of the system «BARS-6 with LM» were calculated using the Monte Carlo method and the MMKFK-2 code. Calculations were performed for two laser module designs: one with an internal neutron polyethylene reflector (7-cmthick) and the second without an internal reflector. Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 7 The basic kinetic parameters, calculated for the two cases are shown in Table 1. Here: k b - multiplication factor of neutrons for the laser module; k r r - a coupling coefficient between the burst reactor cores; k rb - the reactivity induced by the laser Fast neutron flux, rel.units module on the reactor, G - total number of fissions in the laser module per unit fission in 20.0 the reactor core; b - average 17.5 prompt neutron lifetime in a laser module; $=0.0069. The statistical - experiment 15.0 - numerical simulation - analytical formula error of the calculated values 12.5 shown in Table 1 is within 20%. 10.0 The analysis shows, that due to 7.5 the effective shielding of the core 5.0 by 2.5 stationary the boron coating, energy the release distribution in reactor core is not 0.0 0 100 200 Time, s 300 400 Figure.5. Time dependent neutron flux in the BARS-6 reactor during the pulse. affected by the presence of the laser module. Table 1. Neutron parameters coupled system Parameters kb k rr k rb b, s G with internal reflector Calc. Exp. 0.72 0.67 0.25$ 0.46$ 0.65$ 2.0$ 310 270 0.52 - no internal reflector Calc. Exp. 0.78 0.73 0.75$ 0.92$ 3.0$ 3.3$ 310 200 1.56 - Of primary importance is the safety of the system and, in particular, the prevention of an accidental explosion of the core. One possible solution for preventing such an accident is the use of a high power level internal neutron source in the reactor, where the fast control rod is used to generate the pulse. Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 8 E, 10 17 The fissions 3.5 power pulses were simulated for the coupled system 3.0 Hypothetical accident energy level «reactor + LM» furnished with Safe operation energy level internal reflector with the 2.5 condition being that the reactivity input 2.0 into two cores is simultaneous and at the same 1.5 input rate. The parameters of the transient 1.0 processes were calculated for various reactivity 0.5 1.050 1.075 1.100 1.125 1.150 1.175 1.200 1.225 1.250 1.275 1.300 sys; $ - =220$/s; - =20$/s; - =10$/s (sd=100 ms). The core release N, W energy versus a value of the 1 1E+9 below the value of the delay time to shut down the safety block Figure 6. Dependence of the core release energy versus the system reactivity. 1E+10 input rates into the two cores system reactivity (sys) is shown 2 1E+8 in Fig.6 for various reactivity 1E+7 1E+6 input rates . It is clear that the 1E+5 1E+4 energy release of the reactor core 1E+3 reactor - 1E+2 - for the system with internal LM 1E+1 reflector depends considerably on 1E+0 the reactivity input rate into the 1E-1 1E-2 core. This is because the system 1E-3 1E-4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 with internal reflector is weak t, s coupled, in the neutron sense, Figure 7. Reactor and laser module power for nominal pulses. and, therefore, the physical characteristics of the pulses for such a system are similar to those of a reactor without a LM. The nominal power pulses (of 6MJ energy) for the system operating within the safe Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru 9 mode are shown in Fig.7 for a laser module with internal reflector (1) and without internal reflector (2). It is evident that for the first case the pulse duration ten times less than the second case (5 ms and 50 ms, respectively), but at the same time the energy release in the LM for the second case ( 20 MJ) is greater than in the first case ( 6 MJ). The calculations also show that for the first case (laser module with internal reflector) the magnitude of the change in the system’s reactivity does not significantly affect the energy of the pulses. The results demonstrate that the shape of the energy release distribution in the pumped section practically does not change during the pulse. The two dimensional relative energy distribution in the top area of the LM is shown in Fig.8. Figure 8. The energy release distribution in the top area of the laser module. From the above it can be concluded that the coupled system with internal reflector is considerable safer than a system without internal reflector, but the trade-off is that the power parameters of the neutron pulses are considerable lower. REFERENCES 1. Dyachenko P.P. et al. Fusion Technology, 20, 969 (1991). 2. Avery R. «Theory of coupled reactors,» Second Int. Conf. on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. Report #1858 (1958). 3. Gulevich A.V. et al. «Modified neutron kinetic model of the reactor-laser system,» IPPE #2264, Obninsk (1992). 4. Snopkov A.A. et al Proc. of Specialist Conf. on Physics of Nuclear-Induced Plasmas and Problems of Nuclear-Pumped Lasers. IPPE, Obninsk, Russia, v.1, pp.144-156 (1992). Proc. Intern. Conf. ICENES’98, 1998 - 1998 Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Technical Physics Laboratory http://www-tpl.ippe.obninsk.ru E-mail: kuh@ippe.obninsk.ru