International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.1. Introduction This chapter covers two major components of learning objectives/outcomes that are likely to examine via coursework or examination. This chapter will enable students to build their knowledge on following key areas: 3.2. Gains from trade Sources of comparative and competitive advantage Trade and the world economy Barriers to trade Protectionist policies Regional trading arrangements Government policies and international business International institutions and world trade The European Union (EU) Gains from Trade Gains from trade will focus on two key theories of trade: 1. Absolute advantage-Adam Smith 2. Comparative advantage-David Ricardo 3.2.1. Absolute advantage Absolute advantage can be gained when the production of a good in country A takes fewer units of labor than production of the good in country B. For Smith, the organizations in each nation should specialize in producing those things that they can do at the lowest cost. In Smith’s view, costs are based on the value of labor, and the cost to produce a good depends on the amount of labor to produce the good. Thus, country A has an absolute advantage in the production of a good when it takes fewer units of labor to produce the good than in country B. According to Smith, for the world to benefit from absolute advantages, a country should produce goods for which it has absolute advantage and import those goods in which it has absolute disadvantage. You can see the benefits from trade using absolute advantage in labor costs in a simple example of a two-nation, two-product world. Exhibit 3.1 shows an example of French wine production and US wheat production. For a unit of labor, French wineries produce 15 liters of wine, three times the 5 liters produced by US wineries. The French have an absolute advantage in wine Notes compiled by Zubair 1 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com production. US farmers, however, are more efficient than French farmers at producing wheat. They produce twice as many bushels of wheat for a unit of labor as do the French farmers. As you can see in Exhibit 3.1, if countries simply produce for their own consumption of wheat and wine, the total worldwide production in our example “world” is 20 liters of wine per unit of labor and 30 bushels of wheat with two units of labor. Exhibit 3.1: Two-nation Wine and Wheat Production Possibilities with without specialisation under Condition o f Absolute Advantage What happens when we specialize? That is, what happens if US farmers just produce wheat and French farmers just produces wine? When the French shift their inefficient wheat production to wine, for every freed-up unit of labor that previously produced wheat they get 15 liters of wine. Similarly, when the US shifts its inefficient wine production to wheat, it gets another 20 bushels of wheat. The result of this shift in production to specialize in areas of absolute advantage is shown in the Exhibit 3.2. Without using any more labor, total world production increases, and if the US imports wine and the French wheat, everyone in those countries can drink more wine and eat more bread than they did before. Exhibit 3.2: Two-nation Wine and Wheat Production Possibilities with specialisation under Conditions of Absolute Advantage One of the problems of trading based on absolute advantage is that it eliminates many potential trading partners. Although it does not seem to make as much intuitive sense as Adam Smith’s view on trade based on absolute advantage, David Ricardo made the insightful observation that trade can benefit both partners even if one is more efficient in producing both goods. Notes compiled by Zubair 2 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.2.2. Comparative advantage Comparative advantage is said to be gained if the relative advantage in production efficiency that a nation has internally over another. Within any particular nation the companies and industries do some things better than they do other things. That is, for example, one nation may be twice as good at making computers as it is at growing corn. Another nation may be better at growing corn than at producing computers. The principle of comparative advantage explains how these relative differences within countries can lead to beneficial trade between partners. Let us look at a simple example as shown in Exhibit 3.3 to show how trade in such a situation can work for both sides’ benefit. Exhibit 3.3: Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Costs when One Country has Absolute Advantage in Both Goods In this example, we compare US and Chinese production of computers and bicycles. Many people in the US and Europe now fear that production of many goods will go to developing nations, with their low-cost labor and increasingly sophisticated production technologies. However, even if, for example, the Chinese can do most things more cheaply, the theory of comparative advantage suggests that trade can still be beneficial to the world’s trading partners. To illustrate the point, we arbitrarily make the Chinese television and bicycle manufacturers more efficient than their US counterparts. For the example of absolute advantage shown in Exhibit 3.3, we considered only labor costs and input, but since we know that much more than labor goes into producing something, we generalize in this example to consider broadly the input of resources. Thus, in this illustration, the Chinese use 10 units of resources (e.g. labor, materials, capital, machinery, etc.) to produce one computer and 2 units of resources to produce a bicycle. In comparison, the US producers use 100 resource units for a computer and 4 units for a bicycle. The Chinese have absolute advantage in the production of both products because they use fewer resources. Notes compiled by Zubair 3 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com Opportunity cost Comparative advantage relates to the idea of opportunity costs. Opportunity costs arise when the choice to produce one good requires you to give up the opportunity to produce another good. Thus, there is a trade-off each country makes when it decides to produce one good in place of another. A country has comparative advantage in good A if it has to give up producing fewer units of good B than does another country. This means that within that country it is relatively more efficient to produce one product than another product. Comparative Advantage and Production Gains The theory of comparative advantage suggests that countries should specialize not only in those products for which they have absolute advantage but also in those products for which they have comparative advantage. With specialization and trade it becomes possible with comparative advantage for both trading partners to gain. Exhibit 3.4 show how each country could use 10,000 resource units in the production of bicycles and computers. Exhibits 3.4: Production and Consumption Possibilities for Computers and Bicycles Using 10,000 Resource Units in China and the US With no trade between the US and China, which economists call the state of lack of trade, each country would have to produce and consume its own output. Each country would then produce a mixture of computers and bicycles by allocating its 10,000 resource units between the two products. The Chinese could produce up to 1,000 computers with no bicycles or up to 5,000 bicycles Notes compiled by Zubair 4 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com with no computers. US manufacturers could produce up to 100 computers with no bicycles or 2,500 bicycles without any computers. These are the extremes of the production possibilities; more realistically, each country would produce a mix of products depending on consumer tastes. It is unlikely that there would be no demand for at least some bicycles or some computers in each country. For the sake of illustration, let us assume that each country divides its 10,000 resource units equally between bicycle production and computer production. Using the required resource units per computer and per bicycle, Exhibit 3.4 shows the production from 10,000 resource units spread equally between products based on the required resource inputs for each country (see Exhibit 3.3 for the resource units required to produce each product). Chinese manufacturers can produce 500 computers (5,000/10) and 2,500 bicycles (50,000/2) in China and 50 computers (5,000/100) and 1,250 bicycles (5,000/4) in the US. If each country specializes in its area of comparative advantage, as shown in Exhibit 3.4, production becomes greater in both bicycles and computers! Unlike for absolute advantage, total specialization by each country does not always produce more in both products. Comparative Advantage and Consumption Gains With the production gains, there are now 150 more computers and 250 more bicycles available for Chinese and US American consumers. However, in order to get these goods, China and the US must trade. Without trade, Chinese and US consumers were limited in what they could purchase by the range of production possibilities in the trade-offs between computers and bicycles. Exhibit 4.4 shows the net gains in consumption possibilities for the two-country world assuming they were divided equally between China and the US. With trade and the right forms of specialization, consumers in both countries now can consume more than would be possible in a world without trade. Theoretically, at least, everyone benefits. Free trade advocates rely heavily on the theory of comparative advantage to offset arguments that low-cost countries such as China will eventually produce everything, leaving the developed world with nothing but local service industries and many lost jobs. The argument is that no country can have comparative advantage in everything. Notes compiled by Zubair 5 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.3. Sources of comparative and competitive advantage Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage looks at the efficiency of production primarily through labor costs as the basis of comparative advantage. However, there are other sources of comparative advantage besides the efficiency of resource inputs. The question is that what gives one country a comparative advantage in certain products over other countries. Numbers of theories that have sought to answer this question this question Factor endowments: Heckscher-Ohlin Disaggregated factor endowments Revealed comparative advantage Competitive advantage: Porter International product life cycle (IPLC) 3.3.1. Factor endowments: Heckscher-Ohlin The Heckscher–Ohlin theory (HO) argues that a nation’s comparative advantage comes from the relative abundance of its factor endowments. Factor endowments are resources that a nation’s businesses use to produce their products or services. As in traditional views of comparative advantage based on the relative costs of inputs to production, the HO theory uses the relative abundance of capital versus labor to define comparative advantage. There are two basic types of factor endowments. One is capital, which in trade theory refers to inputs that go into making a product or delivering a service, such as land, energy, machines, buildings, or tools. The other is labor. Not all nations have equal factor endowments. For example, the US has abundant supplies of natural resources such as land and energy. Japan has limited factor endowments in land and natural resources such as coal. Possible reasons for these differences in factor endowments could be: Factors of production: such as labour, capital etc,- are hardly homogenous so aggregate statements such ‘labour abundant’ may be relatively meaningless. For example labour can be broken down into many different skills, capital into different levels of technological intensity. Products may exhibit factor intensity reversal in different countries: For example producing certain types of car in Japan (with higher real wages) is Notes compiled by Zubair 6 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com likely to be more capital intensive process than producing the same car in Spain (with lower real wages). Where substantial differences in such factor price ratio exist, there might be factor intensity reversal, with a given product using relatively capital intensive processes in one country but relatively labourintensive processes in another. Factors and product markets must be competitive if differences in factor endowments and therefore factor productivities are to be reflected in differences in product costs. The terms of trade between the potential exported and imported products may lie outside the limits which would permit trade to be beneficial to both parties. For example, the export: import price ratio maybe influenced in arbitrary ways by unexpected fluctuations in relative exchange rates etc. A host of other market imperfections may distort the linkage between factor endowments, actual production costs and the relative prices at which products are exchanged on international markets. 3.3.2. Disaggregated factor endowments This is a more refined version of HO and tried to disaggregate the factors of production into units that are more homogenous for purposes of comparison between countries. Efficiency units: here labour and capital inputs are adjusted to take account of productivity differentials. So Human capital: Workers can be disaggregated by level of human capital (e.g. years of education, experience, etc) and by the type of human capital (e.g. vocational/non-vocational, marketing/non-marketing, etc). 3.3.3. Revealed comparative advantage The suggestion here is that the sources of comparative advantage can be determined indirectly by observing actual trade flows between countries. For example, it is interesting to note that in the more dynamic sectors of UK industry, there are signs of a shift towards the higher end of the quality market for both UK manufacturing exports and for the production of substitutes for manufacturing imports. 3.3.4. Competitive advantage (Porter) Michael E Porter published two articles which discussed about gaining competitive advantage at two different levels. The first article published in Notes compiled by Zubair 7 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 1980s, discussed how a company can gain competitive advantage in a particular industry. The second article published in 1990s discussed about gaining competitive advantage at national level. In here we are more concern about the article published in 1990s. In this article Porter discussed about gaining competitive advantages at corporate level and national level. Competitive advantage: corporate level The competitive advantages of a company are defined in terms of the ‘marginal’ company in that sector of economic activity. They are collection of reasons that allow the more successful companies create positive added-value in that sector of economic activity as compared to the marginal company, which is just managing to survive. Reasons for such competitive advantages could include some or all of the following (Wall et al, 2010, p.89): Architecture: benefits to the company from some distinctive aspect of the set of contractual relationships that the company has entered into with suppliers and/or customers Innovation: benefits to the company from being more innovative than rivals(perhaps reinforced by legal structures, e.g. patent laws). Incumbency advantage: benefits to the company from being an early ‘player’ in that field of activity (reputation, control over resources etc). The essential feature about many of these sources of competitive advantage is that they are usually temporary. Distinctive contractual relationship that prove to be successful ( e.g. franchising arrangements) can be replicated by other firms. Competitive advantage: National level This model of determining factors of national advantage has become known as Porters Diamond. It suggests that the national home base of an organization plays an important role in shaping the extent to which it is likely to achieve advantage on a global scale. In the national context, Porter has again used this perspective of a dynamic, everchanging set of competitive advantages as a basis for explaining trade patterns between countries. Michael Porter introduced a model that allows analyzing why some nations are more competitive than others are, and why some industries within nations are more competitive than others are, in his book The individual points on the diamond and the diamond as a whole affect four ingredients that lead to a national comparative advantage. These ingredients are: 1. The availability of resources and skills, Notes compiled by Zubair 8 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 2. Information that firms use to decide which opportunities to pursue with those resources and skills, 3. The goals of individuals in companies, 4. The pressure on companies to innovate and invest Porter’s answer is that countries produce successful firms mainly because of the following four reasons Figure3.1: Porter’s Diamond Model Demand conditions The demand conditions in the home market are important for three reasons: 1. If the demand is substantial it enables the firm to obtain the economies of scale and experience effects it will need to compete globally. 2. The experience the firm gets from supplying domestic consumers will give it an information advantage in global markets, provided that: 3. (a) its customers are varied enough to permit segmentation into groups similar to those found in the global market as a whole; (b) its customers are critical and demanding enough to force the firm to produce at world-class levels of quality in its chosen products; (c) its customers are innovative in their purchasing behaviour and hence encourage their firm to develop new and sophisticated products. If the maturity stage of the plc is reached quickly and this will give the firm the incentive to enter export markets before others do. (Product life cycles) Notes compiled by Zubair 9 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com Related and supporting industries The internationally competitive firm must have, initially at least, enjoyed the support of world-class producers of components and related products. Moreover success in a related industry may be due to expertise accumulated elsewhere When local supporting industries are competitive, firms enjoy more cost effective and innovative inputs This effect is strengthened when the suppliers themselves are strong global competitors Example: the development of the Swiss precision engineering tools industry owes much to the requirements and growth of the country’s watch industry. Factor conditions These are the basic factor endowments referred to in economic theory as the source of so called comparative advantage. Factors may be of two sorts: 1. Basic factors such as raw materials, semi-skilled or unskilled labour and initial capital availability. These are largely ‘natural’ and not created as a matter of policy or strategy. 2. Advanced factors such as infrastructure (particularly digital telecommunications), levels of training and skill, R&D experience, etc. Porter argues that only the advanced factors are the roots of sustainable competitive success. Developing these becomes a matter for government policies A country creates its own important factors such as skilled resources and technological base. The stock of factors at a given time is less important than the extent that they are upgraded and deployed. Local disadvantages in factors of production force innovation. Adverse conditions such as labor shortages or scarce raw materials force firms to develop new methods, and this innovation often leads to a national comparative advantage. Firm structure, strategy and rivalry National cultures and competitive conditions do create distinctive business focusses. Local conditions affect firm strategy. The following factors do influence the competitive position of MNCs in different countries. Notes compiled by Zubair 10 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com o ownership structure; o the attitudes and investment horizons of capital markets; o the extent of competitive rivalry; o the openness of the market to outside competition. For example German companies tend to be hierarchical. Italian companies tend to be smaller and are run more like extended families. Such strategy and structure helps to determine in which types of industries a nation's firms will excel. In Porter's Five Forces model, low rivalry made an industry attractive. While at a single point in time a firm prefers less rivalry, over the long run more local rivalry is better since it puts pressure on firms to innovate and improve. In fact, high local rivalry results in less global rivalry. Local rivalry forces firms to move beyond basic advantages that the home country may enjoy, such as low factor costs. Other events Porter points out that countries can produce world-class firms due to two further factors: 1. The role of government. Subsidies, legislation and education can impact on the other four elements of the diamond to the benefit of the industrial base of the country. Also a government can o o o o 2. Encourage companies to raise their performance, for example by enforcing strict product standards. Stimulate early demand for advanced products. Focus on specialized factor creation. Stimulate local rivalry by limiting direct cooperation and enforcing antitrust regulations. The role of chance events. Wars, civil unrest, chance factor discoveries, etc. can also change the four elements of the diamond unpredictably. National competitive advantage Successful firms from a particular country tend to have linkages between them; a phenomenon that Porter calls clustering. Clustering allows for the development of competitive advantage for several reasons: Notes compiled by Zubair 11 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com ● transfer of expertise, for example, through staff movement and contracts; ● concentration of advanced factors (e.g. telecommunications, training, workforce); ● better supplier/customer relations within the value chain (i.e. vertical integration). Clustering may take place in two ways: 1. common geographical location (e.g. Silicon Valley, City of London); 2. expertise in key industry (e.g. Sweden in timber, wood pulp, woodhandling machinery, particleboard furniture). 3.3.5. International product Life Cycle According to Wall et al (2010), patterns of products traded between countries will be influenced by the stage of production reached in the international life cycle of variety of knowledge-intensive products. The new product stage will typically occur in the innovating country but then the balance between production and consumption may shift geographically as different stages of the product life cycle are reached. Figure 3.2: International product life cycle for knowledge intensive Notes compiled by Zubair 12 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com Products Wall et al (2010, p.92) discussed each of the diagrams above as follows: New product stage: here production is concentrated in the innovating country, as is market demand. A typical scenario for this stage would be where the relatively low output is sold at premium prices to a price-inelastic domestic market segment. There may be a small amount of production via subsidiaries in ‘other advanced countries’ but little or none in the LDCs. Mature product stage: both production and consumption typically continue to rise in the innovative country, with scale economies beginning to reduce costs and price to a new, more price sensitive mass market segment. Exports to other countries become a higher proportion of total sales. Output of generic products also rises in the ‘other advanced countries’, via the output of subsidiaries or of competitors in these countries which have the knowledgeintensive capability of developing close substitutes. These countries typically import a higher proportion of their sales from innovating country, as do the LDCs. Standardised product stage: at this stage the technology becomes more widely diffused and is often largely ‘embodied’ in both capital equipment and process control. Low-cost locations become a more feasible sources of quality supply in this stage, often via MNE outsourcing and technology transfer. LDCs may even become net exporters to the innovating country and to other advanced countries. 3.4. Trade and the world economy The rapid growth of world trade over the last century reflects, at least in part, the fact that nations have become more interrelated as they have attempted to gain the benefits of free trade. 3.4.1. Types of Trade flows A distinction is frequently made between inter-and intra industry trade Inter-industry trade refers to situations where a country exports products that are fundamentally different in type from those that it imports. Intra-industry trade refers to situation where a country exports certain items from a given product range while at the same time importing other items from the same product range. Notes compiled by Zubair 13 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.4.2. Intra-regional trade It would seem natural that nations would tend to trade more with their immediate neighbors in the first instances, thereby raising the share of the world trade occurring between nations with specific geographic regions. 3.5. Barriers to trade Where one country, or trade bloc, attempts to restrict trade with another, to protect their producers from competition. How will we protect the national/domestic market? 1. Tariff: A tariff is a tax levied in imported goods, usually with intentions of raising the price of imports and thereby discouraging their purchase. Additionally, it is a source of income to the government. 2. Quota systems. A quota will restrict the imports to a particular level, and locally produced goods will become more expensive. The government will receive reduced tariff income. 3. Buy national campaigns. Sometimes a country will encourage its citizens to buy locally produced goods – on other occasions it will enforce this with regulations. A government may say that a particular product must have a certain percentage of locally produced components or labour (as is often the case in car manufacture) or will require fi rms to report quarterly the sources of any purchases over a certain value, and tax them if the proportion of foreign goods is too high. 4. Customs valuations. This approach is not so common now but in the past some govern-ments have insisted that customs duty be paid on invoice cost plus a percentage, effec-tively increasing the cost to the importer. 5. Technical barriers. Some countries insist on over stringent standards of quality, health and safety, packaging or size to restrict what may be imported. Examples of technical barriers: Germany: At one point in time, as environmental legislation Germany insisted that foreign firms importing goods into Germany were responsible for collecting and removing packaging from the country. This increased transport costs to such a level as to make many such goods no longer economi-cally viable. North America: Similarly North America introduced standards for cars requiring the bumpers to be a particular height which was impractical for imported sub-compact cars made by Toyota and Honda Notes compiled by Zubair 14 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 6. Subsidies for local manufacturers. This is particularly prevalent for agricultural products in North America and also in the EU, where the Common Agricultural Policy protects small farmers in the European countries. There has been an ongoing battle between Airbus and Boeing whose respective governments have supported the development of each new airliner with which the companies have sought to dominate the market. Reasons for protectionism - Prevent dumping Protect infant industries (Case of Malaysia) Protect strategically important industries (Case of Malaysia) Maintain employment by preventing the rapid contraction of labour-intensive industries Reasons against Protectionism Prospect of retaliation. The consequences of retaliation could be especially serious for countries increasingly dependent on international trade flows Example: In 2007 German exports of goods and services totalled 38% of GDP, France 24%, Italy 22%, UK 19%, with lower percentages for the export: GDP ratio in Japan (14%), and the USA (8%) (Wall et al, 2010). A tariff raises domestic supply at the expense of imports. If the domestic producers cannot make such products as cheaply as overseas producers, then one could argue that encouraging high-cost domestic production is a misallocation of international resources. Protectionism can erode some of the benefits of free trade 3.6. Regional trading arrangement There are four broad types of regional trading arrangements (RTAs). 1. 2. 3. 4. Free trade area Custom unions Common markets Economic unions Notes compiled by Zubair 15 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com Figure 3.3: the steps of economic integration 3.6.1. Free Trade Area: Free trade areas are reciprocal agreements among a group of nations, usually from one region of the world, to remove tariffs and other trade barriers (e.g. quotas) affecting trade with each other. Each nation, however, remains free to impose any barriers or preferential treatments to other nations outside of the area. The most famous free trade area is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. 3.6.2. Customs Unions Customs unions are similar to free trade areas regarding relationships among members. All members get the same benefits of reduced tariffs and other trade barriers with each other. What makes customs unions different from regional trade agreements is that country members also agree to use uniform treatment of outsiders with regard to trade policies. This means, for example, that South Africa and Botswana in the SACU must impose the same tariff rates or other import restrictions on goods imported from the US or EU. 3.6.3. Common Markets Common markets allow free movement of labor, capital, and technology across member nations’ borders. From the strategic point of view, this allows companies to locate any value-chain activity in any fellow common market country without restrictions. For example, the best available managers and workers can be hired from anywhere within the common market and be stationed at any of the company’s locations. Notes compiled by Zubair 16 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.6.4. Economic Unions The economic union includes all of the integration mechanisms of a common market but goes a step further. Member countries agree to coordinate economic policies, which include such factors as monetary policies, taxation, and currencies. The European Union is making strides toward becoming an economic union as member countries adopt the use of a single currency, called the euro (€). 3.7. Government policies and international business Government policies can influence international business in a variety of ways. For example change in fiscal policies or monetary policies will influence the macroeconomic environment in which domestic and international operates. Some of the policies include 1. Exchange rate 2. Import protection/export protection 3. Tax policies 3.7.1. Exchange rates Few governments can influence their exchange rates directly, via unilateral action. More usually they can only influence such rates indirectly whether intentionally or unintentionally. The increasing and decreasing exchange rate may have impacts on the level of imports and exports. This may depends on the elasticity of demand for imports and exports. If price elasticity of demand for UK exports is relatively elastic (greater than one), then any rise in euro-zone prices will reduce total expenditure in euros on those items. The fall in the euro value of UK exports will mean a still more substantial fall in sterling turnover for UK exporters. If price elasticity of demand for UK imports is relatively elastic, then any fall in sterling prices will raise total expenditure in sterling on those items. This is likely to imply a loss of turnover and market share from UK domestic producers to euro-zones producers. Notes compiled by Zubair 17 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.7.2. Import/export protection As discussed before governments can use variety of tax policies as import or export barriers. The common agricultural policy (CAP) of the EU provides a useful illustration of government-directed policies involving import protection/export support which exert a strong influence on operations of the farms and agri-business, both inside and outside the EU. 3.7.3. Tax policies Various types of taxes Direct Tax Taxes imposed directly on individuals or corporation incomes Examples: 1. Corporate profit tax 2. Income tax (dividend, monthly income) Indirect Tax Taxes imposed on expenditure Examples: 1. Value added tax 2. Custom duties 3. Hydro carbon tax 4. Tobacco tax 5. Import duties Advantage Governmenyt have to collect tax from fewer sources – there are fewer vendors in most economies than there are earners. For a government there are two further decisions to been made other than those implied in the decisions of introducing taxes. Firstly they will need to decide whether the majority of the tax revenue should come from individuals or from companies. Secondly they will need to decide whether how much they wish to raise by taxing earnings compared to the amount the wish to raise via indirect taxation. If government decided to impose heavy tax on companies to raise revenue Difficult to attract MNC or foreign firms to be attracted. Existing MNC may leave the country causing unemployment Notes compiled by Zubair 18 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 3.8. International institutions and world trade In here we pay particular attention to 1. World trade organisation (WTO) 2. International Monetary Fund 3. World bank 3.8.1. World Trade Organisation (WTO) WTO as a successor to the earlier General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT). GATT was signed in 1947 by 23 industrialised nations that include UK, USA, Canada and France plus some other countries. The WTO members in total account for more than 90% of the value of world trade. The objectives of WTO are essentially same as GATT: 1. To reduce tariffs and other barriers to trade 2. To eliminate discrimination in trade 3. Contribute to the rising living standards and fuller use of world resources WTO Principles WTO has sought to implement a number of principles: 1. Non-discrimination among nations in terms of trade 2. Progressive reduction in tariff and non-tariff barriers 3. Solving trade disputes through consultation rather than retaliation Perspective of WTO There are two types of views about WTO. Some criticise WTO and its role in world trade while others favours WTO and its role in world trade. Critics of the WTO Bias to “North”. Inability to progress the Doha Round of negotiation Undue pressure on the ‘South’ Undue emphasis on protecting trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights 5. Undue emphasis on liberalising trade in services 6. Localisation as an alternative doctrine 1. 2. 3. 4. Supporters of WTO 1. 2. 3. 4. Unilateralism/bilateralism may be the alternative to multilateralism. Absence of rules may be the alternative to imperfect WTO rules WTO has not distorted trade patterns WTO is taking more robust actions against trade restrictions from the ‘North’. Notes compiled by Zubair 19 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com 5. Localisation is viewed by free-traders as diminishing the wealth of poorer nations rather than enhancing it. 6. Reformed WTO may have much to commend it. 3.8.2. International Monetary Fund (IMF) The IMF plays a key role in providing foreign currencies and other sources of world liquidity to support the growth of international trade and payments. It also provides specific packages of financial support for economics in times of need. The latter role involves a variety of ‘stabilisation programs’, which provide essential funding but only on conditions that countries receiving funds agree to implement specific programmes of change agreed with the IMF. Foreign currencies and world liquidity 1. Currency quotas: The IMF was originally set up to provide a pool of foreign currencies, which could be used by members to ‘finance’ temporary balance of payments deficits. 2. Quotas: these have been assigned to each country to determine its access to foreign currency and also its voting rights within IMF. 3. Borrowing facilities: There are, however, further facilities for borrowing, with varying degrees of strictness as to the conditions attached. Compensatory financing facility (CEF) Compensatory and contingency financing facility (CCFF) Extended fund facilities (EFF) Oil facilities Buffer stock facility In addition to its normal resources, the IMF has variety of other instruments and facilities as its disposal: Supplementary financing facility (SFF) Enlarge access facilities Structural adjustment facility (SAF) Enhanced structural adjustment facility Trust fund facility Systematic Transformation facility Intermediation IMF has been an intermediary in arranging standby credits at times when currencies have come under severe strains. These credits have not usually been used, but have helped restore market confidence in a country’s ability to withstand speculative pressure, which itself has often eased that pressure. Notes compiled by Zubair 20 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com Special Drawing Rights (SDR) These were introduce by the IMF in 1969, both to raise the total of the world official reserves and to serve as potential replacement for gold and foreign currency in international monetary system. General arrangements to borrow (GAB) In 1962, the ten largest IMF members plus Switzerland constructed the GAB. Each of the signatories contributed an amount of its own currency towards a fund which stood at US$7billion in 1982. Until January 1983, the GAB had been arrangements available only to signatories, but since then its resources have been available to any country in need. SWAP arrangements In 1960s the USA instituted a system of currency swaps with other countries, whereby each central bank agrees to lend its own currency, or to acquire currency balances of the other, for specified time period. Although these are relatively short-term arrangements, there is currently an additional US$30 billion that could be added to total reserves under such scheme. Review of the role of the IMF Some argued that the role of IMF must be reviewed due to the criticism faced by the stabilisation programs offered by the IMF. These criticism include 1. 2. 3. 4. IMF programs are inappropriate IMF programs are inflexible IMF support has been too small, expensive and short-term IMF is dominated by few major industrial countries 3.8.3. World Bank The World Bank is a grouping of three international institutions, namely the international bank for reconstruction and development (IBRD), the international development association (IDA) and the international finance corporation (IFC). Notes compiled by Zubair 21 International Business (MOD001055) Chapter 3: International business: theory and practices Zubair Hassan (2013): International Business-Theory and Practice. International Business zubair@ftms.edu.my or Zubai7@gmail.com Reference list Ajami, R.A., Cool, K., Goddard, G.J., Khambata, D and Sharpe, M.E. (2006). International Business: Theory and Practice, (2nd Edition). pp. 3-19. M.E. Sharpe, Inc. Cullen, J.B., and Parboteeah, K.P. (2010). International Business: Strategy and Multinational Company, pp. 3-33. Routledge, 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Katsioloudes, M.I. and Hadjidakis, S. (2007). International Business: A global perspective. Butterworth-Heinemann /Elsevier Wall, S., Minocha, S., and Rees, B. (2010). International Business, (3rd Edition), pp.1-36. Prentice Hall, Financial Times. (RECOMMENDED READING) Notes compiled by Zubair 22