2. Capital Asset pricing Model

advertisement
2. Capital Asset pricing Model
Dr Youchang Wu
Dr.
WS 2007
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
1
Efficient frontier in the
presence of a risk-free asset
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
2
Capital market line
ƒ When a risk
risk-free
free asset exists
exists, ii.e.,
e when a capital market
is introduced, the efficient frontier is linear.
ƒ This linear frontier is called capital
p
market line
ƒ The capital market line touches the efficient frontier of
the risky assets only at the tangency portfolio
ƒ The optimal portfolio of any investor with mean
mean-variance
variance
preference can be constructed using the risk-free asset
and the tangency portfolio, which contains only risky
assets (Two
(Two-fund
fund separation)
ƒ All investors with a mean-variance preference,
independent
p
of their risk attitudes, hold the same
portfolio of risky assets.
ƒ The risk attitude only affects the relative weights of the
risk-free
risk
free asset and the risky portfolio
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
3
Market price of risk
ƒ The equation for the capital market line
E ( rP ) = rf +
E ( rT ) − rf
σ ( rT )
σ ( rp )
ƒ The slope of the capital market line represents the best risk-return
t d ff that
trade-off
th t is
i available
il bl on th
the market
k t
ƒ Without the risk-free asset, the marginal rate of substitution between
risk and return will be different across investors
ƒ After
Aft introducing
i t d i the
th risk-free
i kf
asset,
t it will
ill b
be th
the same ffor allll
investors.
ƒ Almost all investors benefit from introducing the risk-free asset
(capital market)
ƒ Reminiscent of the Fisher Separation Theorem?
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
4
Remaining questions
ƒ What would be the tangency portfolio in
equilibrium?
ƒ CML describes the risk-return relation for all
efficient portfolios, but what is the equilibrium
relation between risk and return for inefficient
portfolios or individual assets?
ƒ What if the risk-free asset does not exist?
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
5
CAPM
ƒ If everybody
b d holds
h ld the
h same risky
i k portfolio,
f li then
h the
h risky
i k portfolio
f li
must be the MARKET portfolio, i.e., the value-weighted portfolio of
all securities (demand must equal supply in equilibrium!).
ƒ It follows that the market portfolio is a frontier portfolio.
ƒ According to Property III of portfolio frontier (discussed last time), we
must have
E (rj ) = rf + β j [ E (rm ) − rf ], where β j = COV (rj , rm ) / σ 2 (rm )
ƒ This is the famous CAPM independently derived by Treynor(1961),
Sharpe (1964), Lintner(1965) and Mossin (1966)
ƒ E(r
E( m)-r
) f is
i called
ll d market
k t risk
i k premium.
i
A
An asset‘s
t‘ risk
i k premium
i
iis
given by its beta time the market risk premium.
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
6
Underlying assumptions
ƒ Mean-variance preference
ƒ Homogeneous beliefs among investors
regarding the planning horizon and the
distribution of security returns
ƒ No market frictions: no transaction costs,
no tax, no restriction on short selling, no
information cost etc.
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
7
Intuition for CAPM
ƒ Since everybody holds the market portfolio,
portfolio the risk of an individual
asset is characterized by its contribution to variance of the market
portfolio instead of its own variance.
ƒ The contribution of an individual security to the variance of market
portfolio is determined by its covariance with the market portfolio
2
∂
σ
( rm )
σ 2 ( rm ) = ∑ ∑ wi w j COV ( ri , r j ) =>
= 2COV ( ri , rm )
∂ wi
i =1 j =1
n
n
ƒ The part of an asset
asset‘ss risk that is correlated with the market portfolio
portfolio,
the systematic risk, cannot be diversified away; thus, investors need
to be compensated for bearing it.
asset’ss risk that is not correlated with the market
ƒ The part of an asset
portfolio, the unsystematic risk, can be diversified away; thus,
bearing unsystematic risk need not be rewarded, and therefore, an
asset’s unsystematic risk does not affect its risk premium.
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
8
CAPM vs Property III
ƒ Property III is a mathematical property of portfolio frontier that
holds for any return distribution.
ƒ CAPM is an asset pricing relation derived using economic
reasoning.
i
It specifies
ifi h
how risk
i k and
d return
t
are related
l t d in
i
equilibrium.
ƒ Asset returns under CAPM are not exogenously given. They
are endogenously
d
l d
determined
t
i d iin market
k t equilibrium.
ilib i
– If the CAPM does not hold, i.e., market portfolio is not
mean-variance efficient, then demand does not equal
supply
l ffor some assets.
t
– The prices of such assets as well as other assets must
change, therefore the whole return distribution will change
– This process will continue until we converge to an return
distribution that makes the market portfolio mean-variance
efficient.
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
9
Security market line
E(r)
E(r)
Capital market line
Security market line
E(rm)
E(rm)
rf
rf
σ
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
β=1
β
10
SML vs CML
ƒ Capital market line describes the efficient
presence of a risk-free
frontier in the p
asset. It specifies the equilibrium relation
between return and total risk of efficient
portfolio.
ƒ Security
S
market line describes the
q
relation between return and
equilibrium
systematic risk for all assets or portfolios
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
11
Portfolio beta
ƒ CAPM h
holds
ld b
both
th ffor iindividual
di id l assets
t and
d
portfolios of assets
ƒ The beta of a portfolio is simply the
g
average
g beta of each individual
weighted
assets in the portfolio, this is because
n
n
i =1
i =1
COV ( rp , rm ) = COV ( ∑ wi ri , rm ) = ∑ wi COV ( ri , rm )
where wi is the weight of asset i in portfolio
p.
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
12
Zero beta CAPM
Zero-beta
ƒ What if there is no risk
risk-free
free asset?
ƒ Each investor will hold a different frontier portfolio
depending
p
g on his own risk attitude
ƒ According to Property I of portfolio frontier, the aggregate
of each investor‘s portfolio, i.e., the market portfolio, is
also a frontier portfolio
ƒ By Property III of portfolio frontier, it follows that the
linear relation between expected return and beta with
respect to the market portfolio must hold
hold.
ƒ This argument leads to the zero-beta CAPM (Black
1972):
)
E ( rj ) = E ( rz ) + β j [ E ( rm ) − E ( rz )]
where rz is the return of a zero-beta
zero beta portfolio
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
13
Implications for investment
ƒ CAPM solves
l
th
three mostt important
i
t t issues
i
in
i iinvestment
t
t
simultaneously:
– Where to invest? Invest in the market portfolio and risk
risk-free
free
asset!
– How to value an asset? Estimated the beta of this asset and
discount all the future cash flows generated by this asset using a
discount rate given by CAPM!
– How to evaluate investment performance? Adjust the
performance by beta!
ƒ Not surprisingly this is regarded as one of the greatest
results in finance
ƒ But how does it fit the real world?
ƒ Numerous studies have tried to answer this question
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
14
Earlier empirical tests of CAPM
ƒ Cross-sectional
Cross sectional test
– First estimate the beta by running the following time-serise
regression
rjt = α j + β j rmt + ε jt
– Then run the following (out of sample) cross-sectional regression
rj = γ 0 + γ 1 β j + γ 2 CHAR j + e j
where CHAR is a charateristic of stock j unrelated to CAPM such
firm size, idiosyncratic risk
– CAPM predicts that γ0=risk free rate, γ1 =market risk premium,
and γ2 =0
– Tests are usually based on portfolio returns to avoid
measurementt errors in
i estimated
ti t d b
betas.
t
– Supportive results are reported by Fama and MacBeth (1974)
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
15
Earlier empirical tests of CAPM (2)
ƒ Time series test
rjt − rf = α j + β j ( rmt − rf ) + ε jt
ƒ Prediction of CAPM: αj is zero for every stock
or portfolio
ƒ Black,
Black Jensen and Scholes (1972) reject the
standard CAPM in favor of the zero-beta
CAPM
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
16
Roll´s
Roll
s critique
ƒ Roll (1977) argues that CAPM is inherently untestable
– The only economic prediction of CAPM is that the
market p
portfolio is mean-variance efficient
– The linear return/beta relation can be found in any
sample irrespective of how returns are determined in
the market (All we need is to identify an index
portfolio which is ex post efficient)
– All existing tests only tell us whether the market proxy
used by researchers are efficient or not
not, they say
nothing about the efficiency of the market portfolio
itself
– A true market portflio should include all assets
(human capital etc) and is unobservable, therefore
CAPM is untestable
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
17
Roll´s
Roll
s critique (2)
ƒ Roll (1978) further argues that using CAPM to
measure performance is problematic
– If performance is measure relative to an index that is
ex post efficient, then from PIII of porftolio frontier, all
portfolios
tf li will
ill b
be on th
the security
it market
k t liline ((no
performance)
– If performance is measured relative to an ex post
inefficient index, then any ranking of portfolio
performance is p
p
possible depending
p
g on which
inefficient index has been chosen
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
18
Findings from more recent tests
ƒ Th
The relation
l ti b
between
t
b
beta
t and
d return
t
iis weak
k att
best (Fama and French 1992)
ƒ Size
Si effect:
ff t smallll stocks
t k outperform
t f
large
l
stocks
t k
(Banz 1981,Fama and French 1992)
ƒ Book-to-market
B kt
k t effect:
ff t stocks
t k with
ith high
hi h book-tob kt
market equity ratios outperform stocks with low
book to market ratios (Fama and French 1992)
book-to-market
ƒ Momentum effect: Stocks outperforming in the
last 3-12
3 12 months tend to outperform in the
following 3-12 months (Jegadeesh and Titman
1993)
1993).
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
19
Possible explanations for
empirical shortcomings of CAPM
ƒ Measurement
M
t errors
– Measurement errors in beta
– Measurement errors in expected return (survivorship bias)
ƒ Behavioral biases of investors
– Small investors are subject to many behavioral biases
– Institutional investors are subject to agency issues
ƒ Missing risk factors
– People do not just hold bonds and stocks
– Therefore they do not just care about an asset‘s covariance with
a market index
– They also care about its covariance with other components
(such as human capital) of their „true“ portfolio
– This means we have to consider other risk factors as well
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
20
Summary
ƒ CAPM is an elegant model that gives
p answers to several key
y issues in
simple
finance
ƒ The real prediction of CAPM is that the
market portfolio is mean-variance efficient.
ƒ Empirical results should be interpreted
with great caution in the light of Roll´s
Roll s
critique
Asset Management
Youchang Wu
21
Download