How Do You Stack Up Against Your Competition For Landing Industrial and Manufacturing Deals? October 10, 2013 PREPARED BY: Tim Feemster Managing Principal Foremost Quality Logistics O: 469-554-9873 C: 214-693-7689 tim@feemsters.com @tsfeemster - twitter © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 5 Agenda • Introductory Questions • Understanding Trends in Global Logistics – Origin Points – Sea Ports – Intermodal & Inland Ports • What are they • Why are they important • Why do You Care- What is the Supply Chain Network Impact for a Large Warehouse/Manufacturing Property – Cost Drivers for Site Location- Users – What is reverse site selection- EDCs/Owners • Q&A throughout © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 6 Questions • How many of you make your living in – – – – – – – – Economic Development- City/County/State Economic Development- Utility Real Estate Development/Brokerage- Building stuff/Buy/Sell/Lease Supply Chain Industry- Trucking/Warehousing/Consulting/3PL Manufacturer- Make stuff Student or Professor Press Don’t Know • How many of you have lived within 150 miles of a Port city? • Who has visited a Port or Intermodal Hub? • What are the major challenges to Global Trade today and in the future? © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 7 Teamwork- Team projects like those that come down from the State. Who is LEADING, who is not committed, are you on the same page? © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 8 The End-to-End International Supply Chain Manufacturer Data Movement Inland Transportation Head office { Ocean Goods terminal Vendor warehouse / import center Physical Movement Retail Distribution Center Order processing Physical movement Track & trace Store Store Source: Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 9 Relative Cost for Goods Movement International Supply Chain Ship $/Box/Ton Rail $$/Box/Ton Truckload $$$/Truck Less than Truckload $$$$/LB Air $$$$$$/LB Parcel $$$$$/LB Source: Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 10 Profit Leverage Discussion • CEO talks to his SVP of Sales and his SVP of Operations & Supply Chain in their annual goals and objectives meetings – CEO tells the SVP of Sales- “I want a 5% next year increase in sales – CEO tells the SVP of Operations & Supply Chain- “I want a 5% reduction in overall costs next year • Who do you think has the better chance of making his happen? • If both are successful, who should get the bigger bonus? Source: Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 11 Profit leverage of managing costs EXAMPLE: • The bottom line impact of a 5% increase to sales is substantially reduced by COGS • Whereas a 5% reduction in costs goes right to the bottom line Source: Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 12 Profit leverage example- Baseline P&L Baseline P&L $100 Sales $100 Net ($95) COGS 95% $ 5 Profit Source: Foremost Quality Logistics & UNT © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 13 Profit leverage example- Sales up 5% Baseline P&L Sales +5% P&L $100 Sales Sales Increase $100 $ 5 $100 Net ($95) COGS 90% $105 ($99.75) $ 5 Profit $5.25 Improvement $ 0.25 Source: Foremost Quality Logistics & UNT © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 14 Profit leverage example- Sales +5% & Cost -5% Source: Foremost Quality Logistics & UNT Baseline P&L Sales +5% P&L $100 Sales $100 ($95) $ 5 Cost -5% P&L Sales Increase Net COGS 95% Cost Decrease Profit $100 $ 5 $105 ($99.75) $5.25 $100 $100 ($95) ($ 5) $ 10 Improvement $ 0.25 $ 5 Cost leverage results in a much larger return- 20 X © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 15 Profit Leverage- How much is a Nickel worth today? Source: Foremost Quality Logistics & UNT If the net profit on each sales $ is 5%, then... Is Equivalent to a Sales Increase of Cost Savings of $5 $50 $500 $5,000 $50,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 The profit of a Cost reduction of $.05/sq ft on a 1,000,000 sq ft bldg $100.00 $1,000.00 $10,000.00 $100,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $100,000,000.00 equals Sales increase of $1,000,000 for the whole company © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 16 Seven Trends Affecting Site Selection 1. Growing demand in emerging global markets 2. Rising transportation costs 3. Emerging logistics hubs and the expansion of the Panama Canal 4. Downward pressure on rents, now ending and a “flight-to-quality” in real estate 5. Opting for more flexibility with 3PLs 6. Navigating more stringent financial hurdles 7. ecommerce, mcommerce, scommerce Source: Napolitano, Maida (2009), “Site Selection: 5 Trends for the New Economy,” Logistics Management, Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 42-47. and Foremost Quality Logistics Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 17 Port Container Volume Shift- 2006 thru 2012 Source: Foremost Quality Logistics Logistics & American Association of Port Authorities East West Gulf © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 18 Potential New Options – Post Panamax Prince Rupert Greatest Competition for Market Share Seattle Nova Scotia New York Oakland Norfolk LA/LB Charleston Savannah Jacksonville Mobile Source: Foremost Quality Logistics Logistics Lazaro Cardenas © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 19 US Population- W 23%; E 77%; Top DC Markets 23% 77% Kansas City 2009 Population Population Percent Pacific 58,684,030 19% Mountain 12,884,051 4% East Texas/Great Plains 43,539,381 14% 77% Great Lakes/Ohio Valley 56,080,995 18% Mid-Atlantic/Northeast 64,287,713 21% West Southeast 71,530,380 23% 23% US 307,006,550 Source: US Census, NGKF, & PPR © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 20 Percent of Logistics Cost Logistics Cost Breakdown- 2012 70.00% 62.8% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 22.9% 20.00% 5.9% 10.00% 14.4% 3.9% 3.8% 0.8% Administration Other 0.00% Transportation Inventory Source: CSCMP & Tim Feemster, Foremost Quality Logistics Warehouse Labor est Warehouse Non Labor est Cost Category © © Foremost Foremost Quality Quality Logistics Logistics Confidential Confidential 21 Freight, Freight, and Freight, then Labor and Love Inbound Trans 100% 5% 14% % of Supply Chain Costs 90% 29% 80% 70% 5% Outbound Trans 19% 60% 4% DC Fixed 14% 12% 16% 9% 8% 5% 3% 5% 5% 72% 74% Inventory 4% 9% 2% 50% 85% 4% 2% 6% 88% 77% 23% 63% 54% 60% 19% DC Variable 21% 50% 65% 40% 72% 62% 30% 41% 20% 42% 34% 24% 10% 12% 0% High Tech Source: CHAINalytics Regional Retailer Consumer Fulfillment Light CPG Manufacturing Manufacturer © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential National Retailer Food & Beverage 22 Fuel Impact on Warehouse Network Source: Dr. David Simchi-Levi, MIT © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 23 Intermodal Zones of Savings Two Distribution Centers Under Consideration (100,000 sq ft): Site A – Within 5 miles of the hub Site A Hub Site B Site B – 20 miles from the hub Annual inbound intermodal shipments: 2,000 x Difference in drayage costs per unit (A-B): $90 Annual inbound savings when located closer to BNSF Intermodal hub: $180,000 $1.80/sq ft on 100,000 ft © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential Source: BNSF 24 FTZ Example 3,000 receipts inbound per yr. MPF $1,455,000 Pre Foreign-Trade Zone Shipments into Site In a single year an FTZ importer can save $ 1,429,780 MPF Fees One entry filed at End of week. MPF $485 or $25,220 per yr. Assumptions: 1. 3,000 international containers a year into the facility per year 2 Container value $150,000 3 1 BOL per container; $150,000 value per BOL Shipments into commerce with weekly entry. Post Foreign-Trade Zone © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 25 Critical Trend Components STRATEGIC FINANCIAL Sustainability Ecommerce Foreign Trade Zones Vertical Market Clusters Real Estate Strategy Own/Lease/Build Site Selection Criteria OPERATIONAL INTANGIBLES Transportation & Drayage Labor & Healthcare Costs Incentives Deal Structure Lease Renewals Lease Accounting Rules NPV Total Cost Analysis Brand Reputation Unionization Paid Benefits Quality of Life Business Climate Source: Foremost Quality Logistics Rising Fuel Costs Driver Hours of Service Labor Demographics, Aging Workforce, etc. Energy Costs Trucking Capacity Intermodal Access- Int. & Dom. © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 26 Start With Supply Chain Strategy to Get Leverage Source: Gartner / AMR Research © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 27 Top 15 Company Employment Comparison NW OH Region- 16,827 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. SE MI Region- 209,423 Sauder-2,267 GM/Power Train – 1,950 Toledo- S Wrangler Plant-1,400 Chrysler Holdings- 1,200 Owens Corning HQ- 1,150 First Solar- 1,100 Toledo Molding & Dye- 1097 Norplas-1,075 Libbey- 1,000 Chrysler Holdings Machining- 920 Owens Illinois HQ- 885 Dana Holdings HQ- 800 Materion Brush- 700 Int. Automotive Components 683 NSG Pilkington – 600 NE IN Region- 29,723 Ford Motor Co.- 39,134 University of Michigan- 28,525 General Motors Corp.- 25,813 Chrysler, LLC- 25,773 U.S. Government- 19,033 Henry Ford Health System- 18,402 Trinity Health- 13,828 Detroit Medical Center- 13,499 Beaumont Hospitals- 12,767 St. John Providence Health System- 12,649 Parkview Health Systems- 5,395 Lutheran Health Network- 4,667 General Motor- 3,880 Steel Dynamics Inc- 2,254 Lincoln Financial Group- 1,970 BFGoodrich- 1,580 Nucor- 1,550 ITT Exelis- 1,165 BAE Sys Platform Solutions-1,150 Frontier- 1,150 Fleetwood- 1,105 Peyton's Northern (Kroger)-1,017 Vera Bradley- 955 Raytheon Systems Co- 950 Therma-Tru Corp.- 935 Source: Tim Feemster Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 28 Top 7 Company Employment Comparison- Transportation NW OH Region- 4,865 SE MI Region- 2,661 NE IN Region- 3,959 1. UPS – 1,597 Con-way Inc.- 638 Peyton's Northern (Kroger)- 1,017 2. USPS – 948 Rush Trucking Corp.- 534 Norfolk Southern Corp- 784 3. Walgreen’s DC– 800 Global Automotive Alliance- 500 Sweetwater Sound- 510 4. FedEx Ground – 760 Load One Trans & Logistics- 347 Sirva- 500 5. CSX – 600 United Road Services Inc- 300 Wal-Mart DC- 450 6. Norfolk Southern – 500 Evans Distribution Systems- 200 Family Dollar Stores- 353 7. BX Solutions – 200 James Group International- 142 UPS- 345 Source: Tim Feemster Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 29 © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 30 30 UPS & FedEx Ground Delivery Map- Toledo Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 31 FedEx & UPS Ground Delivery Map- Ft. Wayne Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 32 FedEx Ground Delivery Map- Detroit Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 33 FedEx Ground Delivery Map- Columbus Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 34 FedEx Ground Delivery Map- Indianapolis Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 35 FedEx Ground Delivery Map- Louisville Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 36 FedEx Ground Delivery Map- Gary, IN Source: FedEx & UPS Ground Maps © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 37 Economic Impact of the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence Seaway System Source: Martin Associates © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 38 Other Comparisons Category NW OH Region SE MI Region NE IN Region Unionized workers 16.9% 17.4% 12.1% Unionized workers w/o public & teachers 8.5% 12.7% 11.4% Highway connections Excellent Excellent Good Intermodal rail access Very Good- CSX & NS Fair Good- NS Excellent Very Good Fair Industrial assets Good Very Good Fair Airport /international access Good Excellent Fair Unemployment 8.2% 10.2% 7.0% Excellent ?? ?? Seaport access Access to public financing Source: Tim Feemster Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 39 Top 10 Site Selection Criteria- Warehouse/Distribution 1. 2. 3. 4. Transportation costs – both inbound and outbound Logistics infrastructure – highways, intermodal, rail, FTZ Labor costs & availability Supply Chain interruption risk 5. Business climate- is there love 6. Rent /lease terms/ownership 7. Taxes & incentives 8. Utility rates 9. CAM charges 10. Access to public transportation- BRAC commute distance up to 40 mi (80+% of workers in study) Source: Tim Feemster Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 40 Top 10 Site Selection Criteria- Manufacturing 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Labor costs & availability Transportation costs – both inbound and outbound Supply Chain interruption risk Logistics infrastructure – highways, intermodal, rail, FTZ Utility rates 6. Business climate- is there love 7. Taxes & incentives 8. Rent /lease terms/ownership 9. CAM charges 10. Access to public transportation- BRAC commute distance up to 40 mi (80+% of workers in study) Source: Tim Feemster Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 41 What does the Future Hold? • • • • • • • • • Mobile social, and e commerce will explode Transportation & port infrastructures will be more gridlocked Fuel prices will remain volatile & but on average increasing Customers will expect faster and more predictable lead times Global trade activity will grow, but so will its costs, risks, and complexities There will be more sources of financial and operational risk Sustainability initiatives will have greater influence on supply chain networks, facility construction, and transportation choices Ageing populations will create labor constraints in Logistics The rules for lease accounting may change the Rent vs. Buy vs. 3PL decision in some companies Source: Tim Feemster Foremost Quality Logistics © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 42 Soon, I am going to be up to my neck in ALLIGATORS - Questions? © Foremost Quality Logistics Confidential 43