ASSESSMENTS AND EXAM IN KHIB’S MASTER’S PROGRAMME IN FINE ART 1. Introduction to the assessment criteria In art and design education, neither learning or assessment is of the formula. Academic results are complex achievements assessed as a whole, based on professional judgement and qualitative criteria. KHiB uses eight criteria as a common frame of reference for the assessment of students' work at semester assessments and exams: Research Analysis Subject knowledge Experimentation Realisation Communication and presentation Personal and professional development Collaboration and independent professional work Assessment situations are important arenas for learning. The criteria are established to help the students understand what is expected of them, what are the strengths of their work and what aspects should be further developed. More details about the criteria and how they are used at MA level are in the latter part of this document. 1 2. Semester assessments The formal semester assessment consists of a conversation which concludes with the student being given structured feedback on his/her own work and progress. The grades pass and fail are used in connection with semester assessments. Passing the semester assessment is a precondition for further studies in the master’s programme and is worth 30 credits. Learning Outcomes Semester 1 On completion of the first semester, students are expected to be able to cooperate with others on analysing and discussing, critically and effectively, visual (and/or other) information and ideas in a group presentation master and combine methods for exploring and developing their own artistic project Assessment Criteria Research Analysis Communication and presentation Collaboration and independent professional work Basis for the Assessment Presentation at introductory workshop Semester report; summary of the first project period and a proposal for a project that will be developed further oral report (at the assessment conversation); reflection on own learning and work effort apply relevant approaches and methods in their own artistic research communicate and document artistic activity at a high academic level, orally and in writing. 2 Learning Outcomes Semester 2 On completion of the second semester, students are expected to be able to Assessment Criteria Research Analysis plan, carry out and present a self-initiated artistic research project Subject knowledge Experimentation plan and carry out a group exhibition in collaboration with others Communication and presentation Collaboration and independent professional work critically assess their own and others’ artistic production. Basis for the Assessment Project presentation at the MA first year seminar Project exhibited at the MA first year exhibition Semester report; documentation and summary of the second project period, critical reflection on own work during their first year of study and a detailed proposal for a concluding master’s project oral report (at the assessment conversation); reflection on own learning and work effort 3 Learning Outcomes Semester 3 On completion of the third semester, students are expected to be able to show initiative and take personal responsibility for working independently, making decisions and efficiently managing their own time assess and present their own practice in relation to a wider context of contemporary and/or historical art practices explore and analyse an artistic topic and present the result, orally and in writing. Assessment Criteria Research Analysis Subject knowledge Experimentation Communication and presentation Personal and professional development Collaboration and independent professional work Basis for the Assessment Participation in the planning and realisation of the guest lecture programme Text on chosen topic; relevant to the master’s project, written for the MA second year seminar oral report (at the assessment conversation); reflection on own learning and work effort 4 3. Exam At the exam, the student’s work will be assessed on the basis of the learning outcomes defined for the master’s programme. The exam consists of a conversation that includes a presentation and a critical assessment of the master’s project and exam text. The grades pass and fail are used in connection with the exam. The exam assessment is carried out by a commission comprising two external examiners and the student’s main tutor. Learning Outcomes On completion of the Master’s Degree in Fine Art, students are expected to be able to: demonstrate the artistic knowledge, skills and competence required for contemporary art practice at an international level develop and carry out a large independent art project and exhibit it in a professional context identify and evaluate artistic and ethical challenges, as well as relevant theoretical issues analyse and communicate the intentions, values and meaning underlying their artistic work to an audience with and without artistic competence demonstrate knowledge and independent skills in their artistic research work and use them effectively Assessment Criteria Research Analysis Basis for the Assessment Participation in the planning, production and design of the master’s exhibition Subject knowledge Exam text Experimentation Artistic exam project Realisation Communication and presentation Oral report on the development and realisation of the MA project (at the exam presentation) Personal and professional development Collaboration and independent professional work 5 establish, maintain, administer and present an artistic practice in a professional manner assess their own artistic work and take responsibility for their own academic and professional development negotiate and collaborate efficiently with others in order to initiate artistic projects. 6 4. The assessment criteria at MA level Pass Fail 1. Research Project development and methodology Defines and explores the topic and/or problem. Explores sources, uses relevant methods and justifies the choice of methods. Unclear delimitation of the topic and/or problem. Insufficient explanation of the choice and use of sources and methods. 2. Analysis Use and interpretation of source material Presents independent judgements based on exploring and interpreting relevant sources. Critical reflection on complex issues. Presents few judgements of his/her own. Insufficient reflection on complex issues. 3. Subject knowledge Makes systematic use of subject Understanding and application of knowledge in his/her own work. subject knowledge and underlying principles 4. Experimentation Testing of ideas and materials in the realisation of concepts Makes fragmentary use of subject knowledge, demonstrates a poor understanding of the development of the subject. Presents different and innovative Places insufficient emphasis on solutions. Makes independent testing. judgements and choices in complex situations. 7 5. Realisation Skills that enable the realisation of ideas in a relevant medium or material Makes active use of relevant skills in the development of concepts and the communication of ideas. Tackles and solves problems. Makes insufficient use of relevant skills in the development of concepts and the communication of ideas. 6. Communication and presentation Structure, skills in relevant forms of presentation, awareness of approaches and of the needs of diverse audiences Can use relevant presentation forms to explain and summarise own work to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Can to a limited extent explain and summarise own work using relevant presentation forms. Limited ability to structure contents for different purposes and target groups. 7. Personal and professional development Self-directed learning through reflection, planning, subject engagement and commitment Takes independent responsibility for the continuous development of own knowledge and skills. Takes insufficient responsibility for planning and directing own learning. Limited reflection on own strengths and weaknesses. 8. Collaboration and independent professional work Ability to work in a professional context, alone or together with others Self-direction in own work and independent problem solving. Can plan and carry out projects at a professional level. Works efficiently in different groups. Very limited ability to plan and carry out work alone. Shows a lack of understanding of professional life. Takes limited responsibility in collaborative work. 8