01/10/2010 Outline Module 9 Replacement Defender – Challenger Concept Replacement Analysis Replacement Analysis with Additional Period Minimum-Cost Life Analysis or Economic Service Life Module 9: Replacement Analysis SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 9-2 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Questions Concerning Replacement Reasons for Replacement Do we need (want) to replace the one we currently used (defender) with another (challenger)? What will we propose to replace the old one? When is the best time to do it? Decision on the utilization of (productive) assets was set for a certain service life… In times, the performance (expected or unexpected) of asset will be reduced, and other alternatives are to be considered Replacement is commonly considered due to the following reasons: 9-3 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 9-4 Reduce in performance due to friction, deterioration Increase requirements we want better / higher standard specifications (productivity, accuracy, ..) that the one we currently use Obsolescence new (alternative) makes the (still functioning) old ones look less valuable SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 1 01/10/2010 Defender – Challenger Concept in Replacement Analysis Changing Value in Time In accounting, the value of an asset at any given time is estimated and recorded in a book book value However, things do not always proceed as we expected. The real value of an asset differs than the one we estimated. Sunk cost cost we have to pay for bad decision in the past; it is cost that we cannot recover cost Total Annual Cost Annual O & M Cost Time at minimum cost Sunk Cost = Book Value – Realizable Value Annual Investment Cost (Capital Recovery) time 9-5 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Example 9-6 Example A mobile crane was bought for Rp 1,125,000,000 two years ago and was estimated for having service life of 7 years before it can be sold for Rp 234,575,000. This piece of equipment requires an annual operation and maintenance of Rp 37,500,000. Today, the crane’s book value is Rp 821,570,000. However, the best offer for that piece of equipment is only Rp 695,000,000. A new crane worth Rp 1,110,000,000 is being considered for replacement. This crane will have a service life of 5 years and salvage value of Rp 360,000,000. The annual O&M cost is estimated at Rp 21,400,000. Sunk cost = Rp 821.575,000 – Rp 695,000,000 = Rp 126,575,000 Assuming the remaining service life and salvage value of the defender remain the same, Comparing the old (defender) with the new one (challenger): EUAW defender = 695,000,000 (A/P, i, 5) + 37,500,000 – 234,575,000 (A/F, i, 5) EUAW challenger = 1,110,000,000 (A/P, i, 5) + 21,400,000 – 360,000,000 (A/F, i, 5) SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. For i = 11% (A/P, 11, 5) = 0.2706 (A/F, 11, 5) = 0.1606 EUAW defender = 187,894,255 EUAW challenger = 263,395,000 9-7 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 9-8 Retained old crane More realistic condition reduced salvage value for old equipment SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 2 01/10/2010 For Previous Example Defender vs. More than One Challengers Initial Cost Current Salvage Trade- Annual Remaining Book Value in Value Cost Service Value life DEFENDER 850,000 221,500 - 45,000 6 CHALLENGER 1 590,000 435,000 220,120 328,750 11,000 6 CHALLENGER 2 410,000 289,400 330,000 9,750 6 CHALLENGER 3 395,700 250,000 295,000 7,300 6 @ i = 12% (A/P, 12, 6) = 0.2642 ; (A/F, 12, 6) = 0.1142 EUAW defender = 45,000 – 221,500 (A/F, 12, 6) = 19,704.70 EUAW challenger-1 = (590,000 – 328,750) (A/P, 12, 6) + 11,000 – 220,120 (A/F, 12, 6) = 54,884.55 9-9 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Minimum-Cost Life Analysis Alternative way: EUAW = 37,500,000 – 234,575,000 (A/F, i, 5) = - 35,368,145 Retained old crane EUAW challenger = (1,110,000,000 - 695,000,000) (A/P, i, 5) + 21,400,000 – 360,000,000 (A/F, i, 5) = 75,833,000 defender 9-10 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. How to Calculate ESL Economic Service Life (ESL) is the number of year n at which the equivalent uniform annual worth of costs is the minimum. Due to reasons of weariness, in time the performance of asset is decreasing.The ever increasing O&M cost decreasing annual capital cost is accompanied by decreasing cost of capital (investment cost). Year k Market Value ($) AOC Total AW if retained k years Note min ESL 0 1 2 Cost Total Annual Cost (TAC) 3 Annual Investment Cost (AIC) Time at Minimum Cost 9-11 … Annual O & M Cost (AOC) Time, j SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. n AWk = MV0 (A/P, i, k) - MVk (A/F, i, k) +[ΣAOCj (P/F, i, j)](A/P, i, k) j=1…k ESL is at the minimum of AWk 12 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 3 01/10/2010 Exercise Defender Two years ago, Toshiba Electronics made a $15 Million investment in new assembly line machinery. It purchased approximately 200 units at $70,000 each and placed them in plants in 10 different countries.The equipments sorts, tests, and performs insertion-order kitting one electronic components in preparation for special-purpose printed circuit boards.This year, new international industry standards will require a $16,000 retro-fit on each unit, in addition to the expected operating cost. Due to the new standards, coupled with rapidly changing technology, a new system is challenging the retention of these 2-year-old machines.The chief engineer at Toshiba USA realizes that the economics must be considered, so he has asked that a replacement study be performed this year and each year in the future, if need be. At i=10% and with the estimates below, perform the replacement study now. Year k Challenger: First Cost: $50,000 Future market values: decreasing by 20% per year Estimated retention period: no more than 5 years AOC estimates: $5000 in year 1 with increases of $2000 per year Market Value ($) AOC Total AW if retained k years Note 0 15,000 - - 1 12,000 -20,000 -24,500 2 9,600 -8,000 -18,357 3 7,680 -12,000 -17,307 ESL, ND = 3 Defender: Current international market value: $15,000 Future market values: decreasing by 20% per year Estimated retention period: no more than 3 more years AOC estimates: $4000 next year, increasing by $4000 per year thereafter, plus the $16,000 retro-fit next year 13 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Challenger 14 Conclusion Year k 15 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Market Value ($) AOC Total AW if retained k years Note 0 50,000 - - 1 40,000 -5,000 -20,000 2 32,000 -7,000 -19,524 3 25,600 -9,000 -19,245 4 20,480 -11,000 -19,123 ESL, NC = 4 5 16,384 -13,000 -19,126 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Since at ND = 3, the AW of cost of the defender is $17,307, and it is less than the AW of cost of the challenger and the challenger AW at its ESL ($19,123), then Toshiba expects to retain the old machine for 3 more years. Toshiba could perform the one-year-later analysis 1 year from now. For one-year-later analysis, the estimates of all future costs should be updated first. 16 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 4 01/10/2010 Homework #9 Redo the replacement analysis for the mobile crane problem in this module’s example using ESL. 9-17 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. 5